All images show darker in PS since CS4

After installeing CS4, all my images now look darker in PS. They all look at least 20% darker. I still have CS3 installed, and when I look into CS3, they images now also look darker. But when I flip back to Windows, all images look ok.
I thought it might be Adobe gamma - which I had disabled previously because it conflicts with my color spider calibrator. Sinec installing CS4, I looked in the startup folder of windows, but Adobe Gamma is not there... So I wonder what could possibly be affecting the way the images are showing in PS.
I tried a few different proofing methods in PS, but to no avail (only MAC proofing shows the image closer to what it should look like, but it's still not it).
WinXP SP3
Nvidia 8800 GTS
All latest drivers
4 GB ram (xp sees 3.25GB)
Help?

Check your color settings and your display profile.

Similar Messages

  • Safari browser 5.0.6 not displaying all images on a specific site

    I have a MAC running on PowerPC G5, with an OS X Version 10.5.8. I am using Safari browser version 5.0.6. I have been using the browser for years with out any problem until last week. All images show up on all sites except on one specific site. When i use Firefox to open this specific site, all images show up normally without a problem.
    I have tried different methods suggested online including within this site, but the problem still persist. Can any one assist me on how i can resolve this problem and why images do not show up fully on the specific site when using Safari browser version 5.0.6?

    If possible, i can send you the link via email. Please send me your email address so i can send you the URL link.
    <Email Edited by Host>

  • Photos 1.0 not showing all images from Photos Library.photoslibrary folder/file after update install

    I installed the update that changed my iPhoto to Photos 1.0, and the new Photos program is not showing all images from Photos Library.photoslibrary file/folder (not sure to call it file or folder since it is actually a folder with all my pics but it acts more like a file) after update install.  The Photos Library.photoslibrary file/folder shows to be 55 gb in size, and it shows to be loaded into the photos program, but there are maybe a few weeks of pictures showing instead of a few years.  Lots of pictures in the 55 gb are not showing for some reason. 

    No - iPhotos has not replaced anything - it is new and an addition - iPhoto is still on your system in the applications folder and still works just fine
    Outlook is not supported by Photos - not sure if the support must come form Apple or MS as Photos uses a different interface to external packages than iphoto did
    LN

  • Browser should show ALL images, in all formats.

    I recently opened an image for editing from Lightroom to Photoshop, corrected some perspective distortion, and saved the result as a PNG.  Lightroom then failed to show the new image, even after I synchronized the folder.  A respondent in the Lightroom forum said that Lightroom doesn't support PNG, to which I ask, WTF?
    Lightroom should support any format supported by Photoshop.  It displays JPEGs, which aren't a raw format.  Exactly how many products should we have to run concurrently to simply manage images?  Lightroom is supposed to be the product that does it, but if it fails to show all images in each directory, it fails at its purpose.

    MikeLeone wrote: So you think LR should support BMP? PCX? How many cameras store their
    photos in these formats? PS supports them, but why should LR?
    I'll agree with support for PNG, at least as far as exporting, as some
    web sites like using this format rather than JPEG (although the
    reasons for using PNG aren't technical, but legal, AFAIK - licensing
    for using the JPG format - rather than something technical, like
    smaller file size, etc).
    Very true, though I am more arguing that LR should be able to leverage formats available to other Adobe products installed on the same machine more than anything.
    BMP and PCX, no most cameras don't use those formats *anymore*. But I remember having an old camera that took photos in BMP format (it may have been a webcam, but still a camera) which I have in my library from a long time ago. In my day job we still actually use applications that suprisingly enough can only display PCX images; though I never would intentionally keep anything in PCX.
    I think anything it is able to import it should be able to export; but again if you have it natively supported in the Adobe product or universally supported by the OS without additional codec installation it should be supported, even if it is something obscure as PCX.
    MikeLeone wrote:
    That should be a feature request for the camera manufacturers, then,
    shouldn't it? Ask them to share their non-published, proprietary
    drivers with Adobe? Or at the very least, publish an API so LR (and
    presumably, other programs) can call the code (presuming that the code
    is modular enough to be called by other programs, of course).
    Yeah, I understand that neither Canon nor Nikon are supporting DNG files straight out of the camera yet and both still maintain a propreitary formated RAW file, but I would suspect that generally a Canon .CR2 file doesn't change all that much if at all other than the camera identifier from a 20D to a 5D Mk II to the 7D for example.
    Why do current Lightroom users need to wait until Adobe releases 2.6 or 3.0 to be able to use Lightroom with their 7D?
    Why if Adobe releases a Camera RAW update for PS that includes the 7D does it still not work in LR?
    Yes the mfg. need to be more open or pick a standard and run with it, but it just seems excessive for Adobe not to play nice too.
    It is in Canon/Nikon/Adobe's best interest to play nice and share this information with Adobe. So I am betting they are not withholding it. I was getting Canon SDK notifications for the longest time and sometimes months before a Camera was available, and sometimes it was even annouced this information was made available to developers on new camera models. I am sure Nikon does the same thing and Adobe is getting this information from all mfg.
    Christopher

  • Extended Podcasts not showing all images

    I just noticed that the extended podcasts that I have, which include a number of images, only show the first image during the playing of the podcast. On the iPhone or iPod Touch, the same podcasts will sequence through the added images as necessary.
    Has anyone else seen this? Is there a preference that needs to be changed? Some other fix?
    Thanks,
    Dave

    I'm seeing the same thing with enhanced podcasts on my iPad. Initially I thought it might just be the enhanced podcasts I created some time ago, but I've since downloaded an enhanced podcast from early last week. Seeing the same problem in a more recent enhanced podcast.
    Chapters are working fine, but the images are not changing. Both enhanced podcasts work fine on the most recent iTunes.
    On perhaps a related note I am seeing other image issues in the iPod app on iPad (album art not showing up correctly, random album images showing up).

  • IPad has suddenly started showing all images as "negatives"?? How do I get it back to normal??

    iPad has suddenly started showing all images as "negatives"?? How do I get it back to normal??

    Settings > General > Accessibility > Invert Colors turn Off.

  • What is All Images in Finder for? Pictures from email show up there, sometimes 12 of the same picture. Can I delete them?

    Can I delete the thousand pictures in All Images that show up there w/o doing any harm?

    You shouldn't be able to see those folders if you don't know what they are! Be sure to turn off invisible files in Terminal.app by pasting this command
    defaults write com.apple.finder AppleShowAllFiles -bool false; killall Finder
    Press 'return'.

  • Gallery showing all images

    I am having a problem where the Gallery application on my new N73 is showing _all_ the images on my phone, regardless of their name or format.
    For example I have 5 images belonging to an application installed on the memory card that are named either *.off or *.dat in the folder, but both Gallery and File Manger can open and view the files.
    Is there any way to tell Gallery to only look for images in certain folders, or hide folders from Gallery's eyes?
    I'm not so concerned about File Manager as its fairly nice to be able to see files if I go looking for them, but having the Gallery cluttered up is a pain.
    Dan

    Nope Sadly not - by default all images are shown in the gallery and there's no way of changing that... unless you install some 3rd party programs...
    I use one called Smart Guard Pro - google for it. There's a trial version, but could be a bit too much for what you need - it requires a password to access the hidden images.
    It also lets you hide Texts & contacts etc.
    Nokia History: 3110, 5110, 7110, 7110, 3510i, 6210, 6310i, 5210, 6100, 6610, 7250, 7250i, 6650, 6230, 6230i, 6260, N70, N70, 5300, N95, N95, E71, E72
    Android History: HTC Desire, SE Xperia Arc, HTC Sensation, Sensation XE, One X+, Google Nexus 5

  • Images showing red blue spot and they are not crisp at all - Canon EOS 600 D

    Hello,
    About a month ago i bougth Canon EOS 600 D with 18-55 mm and 55-250mm lens and everything goes fine i capture moon images and wildlife pictures as well. 
    But, now i'm facing some problem with it.
    Recently i was trying to capture images with my Canon EOS 600 D and suddenly i noticed that the images are not sharp at all and the images show red and blue spot. I don't know what to do i'm just an ammature in this. 
    Please any one can help me with this problem.
    Canon EOS 600D & EOS 5d Mark iii
    Best DSLR's to make Images Real !
    Apple News
    Solved!
    Go to Solution.

    If you're taking shots of just the moon then the exposure value won't change all that much day to day.  I recommend shooting in full manual, use the same settings that you used that gave you images you liked as a baseline.  Low iso, nice middle aperture, and adjust shutter speed to fine tune the exposure.  The next day you start at the same settings and adjust the shutter speed slightly if needed to account for a change in brightness.  Good luck, have fun.

  • Opened up LR and none of my images show in import, library, collections, filmstrip or develop modules. All other data is there.

    I opened up LR 5 today and found that NONE of my images show up as thumbnails, filmstrip, in develop module, import or anywhere else. In develop module, all develop settings are there. The only thing missing is the image itself. I cannot see ANY of my images even though they are physically there on the HD. If I select an image (or image placeholder) and select "edit in PS", then PS opens and I see the full image for editing. I just don't see any of my images while in LR. I've rebooted my comp, did a "repair" on the LR installation and even a re-install of LR5. NOTHING works. I need help!!!
    -Brian

    How do I change my monitor profile to check whether it’s corrupted? - The Lightroom Queen Help Desk & Members Area - Pow…

  • I deleted the picture in iphoto, then emptied my iphoto trash, but the picture is still showing on my computer when i go into my trash under "all images" How do you delete pictures even when you empty the trash and they stay in the computer?

    I deleted the picture in iphoto, then emptied my iphoto trash, but the picture is still showing on my computer when i go into my trash under “all images” How do you delete pictures even when you empty the trash and they stay in the computer?

    Wtih iPhoto 9 when the iPhoto Trash is emptied the files get moved to the Trash bin in the Dock as a second chance to change your mind.  Look in the Dock's Trash bin.
    OT

  • E mail attachments that are deleted show up in all images or all documents; how can I prevent this form happening?

    e mail attachments that are deleted seem to still show up in the all images or all documents files; how do I keep this from happening?  If an attachment is deleted I don't want to continue to keep a copy anywhere.  Thanks.

    I know this is almost a year later but I have been searching for a solution to the same problem you had. How did you fix this issue? I can see that something pops up on this site right before a transition. Why does that happen and not show in the preview and how do you fix it? Any help is appreciated!

  • Firefox shows images too dark; Chromium does not

    I'm running an Arch installation on my laptop, which has an Nvidia GT425M gpu with the nvidia proprietary drivers installed. Firefox renders images noticeably darker than they should be, but Chromium does not have such an issue. I have disabled hardware acceleration on Firefox, but it didn't help. Anyone seen this before or have any advice?

    Maybe https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/doc … in_Firefox ?

  • Ever since updating to ff3.6 my ebay pages load funny after I get thru the initial screen. the formatting is all screwed from the way it should be and all images have disapppeared. WAZUP????

    I get to the MY EBAY screen ok most of the time but if I want to go search for something or view one of the items I am bidding on the page display get all screwed up. It seems as if the page was disassembled in pieces and stretched out vertically. All images are gone and everything is out of place.

    Do you have a backup that you can restore from? Your old hard drive seems to be the problem.

  • No images showing in LR2.6

    I am running LR2.6 on a Dell XPS435T 64b W7.  I downloaded LR2.6, and it seemed to work ok for a while.  Now when I open my catalog there are no images, only gray squares.  The correct metatata shows on the side bar, as do the rating stars on each gray image.  If I doubleclick on the image frame, it will open in CS4 Photoshop.  It seems to be working ok on my laptop.  The only change I can think of that I made in the system was to install Spyder3plus monitor calibration software, and then calibate the monitor with the Spyder3 sensor.

    LR boots pretty quickly.  My catalog has just under 39000 DNG images in it.  The device manager shows 8 processors, [email protected].  I have 12gb of installed RAM, and an ATI Radeon HD 4800 Series display adapter.  I am not too savvy about all these specs, but I gather it is supposed to be pretty capable.  The machine came with Vista ultimate installed, but I installed W7 beta shortly after I got it, and was so impressed that I upgraded immediately after W7ultimate came out.  I only just now got around to reinstalling the Spyder3plus, but downloaded the 3.1.3 software software just in the last few days.  The Datacolor page just shows "win" for capability, so I don't know if it has been tested for w7.  If I am reading the system details correctly, it is in fact using the Spyder3 profile.
    I really appreciate your inputs--as you can tell, I am not too swift with technical details.  many thanks!  RB
    Date: Sun, 17 Jan 2010 13:19:03 -0700
    From: [email protected]
    To: [email protected]
    Subject: no images showing in LR2.6
    Maybe the Spyder profile didn't get seen by LR initially.  Presumably you shut everything down and have rebooted between the time of using the Spyder and then LR.  Is it possible to tell for sure that the Spyder profile is being used.  Maybe Win7 has reverted back to its own internal profile and that is why it is working.  Do you know if the Spyder software has been updated since Win7 came out?  If not there could be some incompatibility with Win 7.  Win7 has its own simple monitor calibration process, now, much like Adobe Gamma used to do, so it may be wrestling control back from the Spyder profile loader unless the Spyder software has been written specifically to work with Win7.
    Not responding messages can be a result of other processing hogging the CPU or memory causing LR to wait or the machine, itself, not having the horsepower to run a program like LR.  I have a single core machine and typically wait for several minutes after starting up LR before I have control with my keyboard and mouse, so there are some things that a new machine would help with.  Thankfully my machine does have 4GB of memory.  When used LR on a 1GB machine, LR was mostly operating on virtual memory which can cause big slowdowns.
    >

Maybe you are looking for