All This Talk of ProTools Editing Being Better Than Logic . . . Really?

OK so I admit, I've never used Pro Tools. But lately there seems to be this chatter about how Pro Tools audio editing capabilities are so superior to Logics. Are they? What am I missing? Logic seems to do everything with audio that there is to do. OK I would appreciate a slip tool now or then to slide audio around within a region. But you can get around that using anchors in the audio window or sample editor. And sure there's no sample accurate edit in the arrange window. But who cares. That's what the sample editor is for. I guess I just wonder how green the grass really is on the other side. Can anyone shed some light on this for me.

there seems to be this chatter about how Pro Tools
audio editing capabilities are so superior to Logics.
Are they? What am I missing? Logic seems to do
everything with audio that there is to do.
I was a part of some of those threads. I am new to Logic (5 months or so now). I've used ProTools for years and years (and still do for some things).
My posts have consistantly indicated that I love Logic. I now prefer it over any DAW. And for writing it's killer.
But my complaint with Logic has been to do with editing. I am always very quick to add to those complaints that my editing "issues" may just come down to my inexperience - or my not doing things the right way within Logic.
But thus far I've read the manual on editing many times, I've watched relevent chapters of the M Sitter video series many times. I've watched the PRO ASK advanced editing video a number of times. I've scoured this forum. And spent a week in a Toronto studio on a project with a producer who is a long- time Logic user, and watched him like a hawk. So if I am missing some Logic audio editing truths - I've yet to know where to look for them or see them in use.
Below are the specifics you asked for - at least in my opinion. Again .. I hasten to add that I would take Logic over any other DAW. It's a fantastic program and way more advanced than I am.
Your question of specifics:
In general it's just faster and easier to edit in ProTools for these reasons/features:
1. My experience with PT vs inexperience with Logic (I mention that first as it's gotta be a major factor with everything that follows).
2. Protools' way of handling regions that overlap is simple. It's less versatile than Logic, but it's simple and fast. Once you decide on an edit and cross fade for two regions, it doesn't change visually or sonically regardless of what regions are selected afterward. Unless you change it, that is. This is confusing to describe. Regions don't go changing around when you back up through selelctions to check things. If this makes no sense to Logic users - it does to PT users I can guarantee ... In short, when editing a track I would like to be in overlap and crossfade modes together.
3. The "smart tool". I miss it. MISS it. It allows you to Select, Fade in or Out, Trim regions, Move, crossfade, and control the crossfade all with one tool depending on where it is over region.
4. Quick changes to Slip, Shuffle, Grid and Spot modes with one key.
5. 4 or 5 (it's not open just now so I forget) quick user definable Zoom presets with one click.
6. Beat Detective is pretty cool if editing things played by musicians ... who ... well ... have an alternative sense of timing shall we say.
Smaller Issues:
6. SPL is more easily handled in PT for editing audio. You can click anywhere to move it. Not a big deal for most things but very big deal when editing. Also ... one can easily change the behavior of the SPL when stopping playback. Should it return to where you started playback after checking multiple edits? (Very handly when zoomed in) Or should it stay where it stops? You decide. It's quickly changed back and forth in PT.
7. Small issue ... Cutting is one click faster.
8. Region lists are very like an EDL - handy and can be hidden very easily too (not a big deal ... I like Logic way of handling this too).
In short, PT is way less versititle than Logic. But I find if I have to extensive audio editing in a hurry I will invariably dump the file in to PT.
In ase anyone thinks I am bashing any DAW here I will say it again. Read point #1 above. And . .... I LOVE Logic. I work almost exclusively in it now. If there editing tricks in Logic that I've yet to learn then I cannot wait. So far it's my only complaint ... editing audio.
My two cents.
Dee

Similar Messages

  • All this talk.....

    All this talk about problems with computer lags and spinning beach balls. Is Apple doing anything to fix these problems? I am still having trouble with my computer going into "Lag Mode" and pausing my movie that is playing when all I am doing is surfing the internet with FireFox and watching a home movie in quicktime. I was able to do a lot more with my previous MBP. Does anyone have see a light at the end of the tunnel?

    Customers have been told that Apple is working on a software/firmware fix, but there is no ETA yet. Check your Software Update daily.
    Dave M.
    MacOSG Founder/Ambassador  An Apple User Group  iTunes: MacOSG Podcast
    Macsimum News Associate Editor  Creator of 'Mac611 - Mobile Mac Support'

  • All this talk about HEAT, my PowerBook G4 1.25GHZ gets hot!

    I have ordered a new MBP 2.16GHZ 1GB 120HD but since I heard all the talk about heat I started monitoring my Powerbook G4 1.25GHZ and you know what, it gets hot!
    I downloaded a widget from the Apple site and after about 4-5 hours of just regular web surfing and iTunes I had a CPU bottomside temp of 136F! It was hot between the F keys and the screen almost too hot to touch. I have owned this machine for three years and have never noticed it!
    I am somewhat relieved as I think that I have been worried about something that has always been there and never affected my Mac experience before. Obviously this new Mac has a much faster CPU inside so I expect it will get at least as hot. I am not saying that the heat is normal it's just nothing new.
    Anyone else noticed this since they started reading about it?

    I really do wonder about these 2.16 models. I had a 2.16 on loan while my 2 GHz version was being repaired and it ran warm, but nowhere near the temperatures of the 2 GHz.
    Anyway, I got the 2 GHz back and two weeks later the battery started to swell. Now they are upgrading me to the flagship model for free; all heat related issues BTW.
    I understand the loyalty and need to defend Apple, but when you run a business you tend to feel a little differently I guess. Glad to hear your not experiancing problems.
    S

  • All this talk about problems with the iphone 4

    But everyone keeps it, complaints is all i see, companys only understand sale's that's why you have not heard any more response from apple, iphone 4 is selling like wildfire, even with it's problems.

    My goes back this Friday, just in time for my HTC Desire to be delivered. Loads of reviews claim the HTC Desire is just as good (some say better than the iPhone 4). Unless you are 100% happy then there is no point in keeping it. A software update is not going to help a hardware problem. My main gripe was with emails, o.k that can be resolved in an update but now I'm too ****** off waiting for an update, which should have come 2 weeks ago

  • All this talk about getting the firmware updated

    Anyone had any luck rolling theirs back? Updating mine was a huge mistake as I have absolutely no interest in syncing with WMP. I would like to be able to go back to the previous firmware now, but of course the .20.08 firmware app won't detect my player. I can't even get MediaSource to detect my player now. WMP is the only thing that connects and I have no interest in being railroaded into using that ridiculous, clunky system.
    Any success stories would be appreciated.

    My goes back this Friday, just in time for my HTC Desire to be delivered. Loads of reviews claim the HTC Desire is just as good (some say better than the iPhone 4). Unless you are 100% happy then there is no point in keeping it. A software update is not going to help a hardware problem. My main gripe was with emails, o.k that can be resolved in an update but now I'm too ****** off waiting for an update, which should have come 2 weeks ago

  • All this talk about calibration makes me wanna know if i can use this...

    i have recorded an exs24 909 tick to and audio file on channel 2 and
    set the anchor to play the file at the first position of the wave display.
    created a loop back from a delta 44 card.
    I have seen that the delay needs to be set to -57 ( i have rebooted several times, i have done a gain plug phase invertion and it cancels out.)
    but my question is it seems that it need to be set to -57.5, but i can't seem to do this setting.
    is it possible?

    Hey FP,
    Need to get our terminomology straight first
    You said "it is half a tick away from the downbeat". A tick's a lot wider than a sample. I think you mean 1/2 a sample away from the downbeat, right? (Pls. confirm).
    The shape of the wave should be nearly identical if you're doing a straight loop-back. But I'll be curious to see your screenshot just to make it all clear.
    It's hard to say what the ms of delay would be at 44.1K. It's dependent on your particular hardware, audio system, etc. Tele's saying that the buffer size shouldn't matter. I'm going to experiment later tonight to reacquaint myself with the behavior of that parameter. Not saying tele's wrong, just want to see for myself.
    But if my math is right (and there's no guarantee it is) at 44.1, each sample lasts .02 milliseconds. So if you need 1/2 sample more (which isn't possible), a) you ain't a-gonna get it, and b) you probably don't need it LOL! (Can someone please check my math?)

  • All this talk of freezing with the 13" mbp is worrying...

    And is slightly putting me off buying the 13" 2.53ghz with 4GB. Can anyone reassure me that mine isnt going to freeze all the time? Why is the unit freezing? is it after market parts? Or just the general OS?
    Ill be getting mine with snowleopard.

    When you get it, try downloading and installing this recently released Performance Update 1.0 for Snow Leopard (10.6).
    It should take care of the pinwheel issue.
    DALE

  • Thank you Adobe for being better than useless at solving my SD 16:9 PAR Problem

    I have read everything on these forums about the new PAR for SD 16:9 which is now 1050 x 576.  I have finally got a project for broadcast on SKY and guess what I can't even get a video cleared on Clearcast because it won't accept the new PAR, their server throws up an inccorect PAR error saying my video is 1:1.85 which is incorrect for their purposes.  I explained the logic to various technical guys there and they understand but don't care, they want an anamorphic SD 16:9 video that scales to 1024 x 576.  I've tried everything and have had to resort to either sending it to a post production facility and being charged not only for the rough cuts I send to Clearcast but also the final versions to Adcast for final approval for SKY or buying Sorenson Squeeze.  Premiere is useless for both purposes because they are sticking to 1050 x 576 PAR for SD 16:9. Before you try to explain that this is correct, I already know, but that isn't helping solve my problem.  This is SKY we are talking about, one of the major broadcasters and Premiere has failed to deliver.  This is going to cost me £300 - 500 to sort out.  I've used Premiere for must be getting on for 10 years, people have been complaining about this problem for ages and there are work arounds but none of them solve the final export PAR.  If I buy Sorenson, I think I might go to FCP or Avid for the first time in 10 years of editing; I finally get a broadcast job and Premiere fails me, thanks a bunch Adobe, all you have to do is offer the ability to do this whether it is right or wrong and you can't deliver on it, just take a look at your forums and you will see that this is a recurring problem, why the hell haven't you sorted it out.
    If I have to pay £500 plus for Sorenson just to encode SD video I'm damn sure I'm not going to upgrade to CC on principle, time to jump ship I think, Adobe have obviously reached that size that all companies reach where they no longer care about the small guy trying to do his job.

    Before you try to explain that this is correct
    I'm not sure it is correct.  On the NTSC side, it's definitely not correct.  Adobe switched to the PAR used by the BBC, but those values were designed for use with the 702 pixel Clean Aperture.  That's fine with analog material, but it actually works out to be incorrect for digital signals using the full 720 raster.  This is why we get very small black bars on the sides when downscaling HD to SD, even though the SAR is identical for both.
    Rather than use the correct values, Adobe switched to the incorrect values used by much of the world.
    Except SKY, it would seem.  But that does mean you will have to follow the instructions provided by both Jeff and Mark in the original thread.
    http://forums.adobe.com/message/6299233?tstart=0#6299233

  • Will this setup work better than my iMac?

    I edit lots of DSLR HD video on adobe premiere CS6, and have been using a 2011 21.5" iMac with an i5 processor and 12GB of ram. I am going to ditch my mac (since I don't even use any mac based programs anymore due to fcpx sucking) and building a PC. Here are the parts:
    Intel Core i7-3770K 3.5GHz Quad-Core Processor
    $299.99
    FREE
    $299.99
    Amazon
    Remove
    Buy
    CPU Cooler
    Choose a CPU Cooler
    Motherboard
    ASRock Z77 Extreme4 ATX LGA1155 Motherboard
    $124.99
    $2.99
    $127.98
    Newegg
    Remove
    Buy Combo
    Combo discount automatically applied. (View details.)
    Memory
    Corsair Vengeance 16GB (2 x 8GB) DDR3-1600 Memory
    $67.99
    FREE
    $67.99
    Amazon
    Remove
    Buy
    Add More Memory
    Storage
    Seagate Barracuda 1TB 3.5" 7200RPM Internal Hard Drive
    $73.75
    FREE
    $73.75
    NCIX US
    Remove
    Buy
    Samsung 830 Series 128GB 2.5" Solid State Disk
    $104.99
    FREE
    $104.99
    Adorama
    Remove
    Buy
    Add Additional Storage
    Video Card
    EVGA GeForce GTX 650 2GB Video Card
    $149.99
    -$20.00
    $129.99
    Microcenter
    Remove
    Buy
    $20.00 mail-in rebate
    Sound Card
    Choose a Sound Card
    Case
    Antec Twelve Hundred V3 ATX Full Tower Case
    $119.99
    -$10.00
    FREE
    $109.99
    Newegg
    Remove
    Buy
    $10.00 mail-in rebate
    Power Supply
    Antec Neo Eco 520W 80 PLUS Certified ATX12V / EPS12V Power Supply
    $54.99
    $3.99
    $58.98
    Newegg
    Remove
    Buy
    Optical Drive
    Asus DRW-24B1ST/BLK/B/AS DVD/CD Writer
    $19.98
    $19.98
    Outlet PC
    Remove
    Buy
    http://pcpartpicker.com/parts/optical-drive/
    Will this new computer work a LOT better than the machine I currently have? Will it be a worthwhile upgrade? Will my video card work well for my intended purposes in Premiere?

    Go to the CS5 Benchmark http://ppbm5.com/ and review the results
    To allow for future expansion (more ram and added hard drives) my PERSONAL choice would be a larger power supply
    The computer I built is described in http://forums.adobe.com/thread/652694 - with an 850w power supply

  • Is 1.3 Bios really better than 1.52B?? Neo2 Board and Some Observations!

    Hi All... I read this post on the forums and it got me thinking and i did some fiddling and made some observations..
    This is whith regard to the 1.3Bios being better than the 1.52B Bios.. because it would let you run in turbo mode...
    Ok i've spent the last 60mins testing and i came up with the following..
    1.3BIOS
    With the 1.3Bios.. no matter what memory timings u set... it does'nt show in CPU-Z and it does'nt make a difference in the memory bandwith scores...
    For example my ram was rated at 2.5-3-3-8 .. i changed it to 2.5-2-3-8 .. it did'nt change and my scores remained the same..
    Going from Slow to Fast to Turbo.. did'nt incrase my scores.. actually.. donno how.. but i got a decrease in scores..
    The only thing that was noticable was that MSI core-center overclocks the CPU a lil more than what is set in BIOS..
    1.52B BIOS
    With the 1.52B Bios... u can change the memory timings and it does show in CPU-Z and it makes a massive difference with Sisoft sandra.. 250mbps more..
    What u set in the bios .. u get with the 1.52B.. Corecenter does'nt mess around and overclock it more..
    Going from Slow to Turbo did give me an increase in scores.. slightly..
    Im now running Ultra-Turbo.. and i get a sisoft bandwith score of 5250Mbps at 3.21G..
    CONCLUSION
    So infact i think the 1.52B is better than the 1.3 . I don't have a Radeon so i donno how these bios's work with the cards cause i've read about some problems... I'm getting one soon so 'ill post some info about that in a fortnight..
    I personally think this board is great.. atleast the one i have.. never had a problem.. had it for 3 months.. i have a revision 1.. no DOT sticker.. and just the Neo2-S version... I've used Spectec 333 on this board too (dual) had no problems..
    Wish i had some DDR-500 so i could test whether this board can do 1:1 above 250...whether it has a 1:1 limitation above 285 like some other boards.. that is my only doubt.. anywayz.. i hope atleast some of u are sailing as smoothly with this board as i have..
    Get some nice ram .. this Twinmos Dual channel kit DDR400 with the Twinmos chips are really great.. and i recommend it..

    Quote
    Originally posted by DeReD
    1.3BIOS
    With the 1.3Bios.. no matter what memory timings u set... it does'nt show in CPU-Z and it does'nt make a difference in the memory bandwith scores...
    For example my ram was rated at 2.5-3-3-8 .. i changed it to 2.5-2-3-8 .. it did'nt change and my scores remained the same..
    Going from Slow to Fast to Turbo.. did'nt incrase my scores.. actually.. donno how.. but i got a decrease in scores..
    That´s wrong. RAM-Settings are displayed fine. Turbo does make a BIG difference in scores. About 15% more performance. In Games and in benchmarks like 3dmark and sandra, too.

  • Free dvd maker is better than encore cs4

    Hi Forum,
    OS: Win Vista Ultimate 64bit
    Encore CS4
    Windows DVD Maker
    I have shot some footage and have they in dvd pal format.
    I was able to create a motion menu, slide show and advd with encore cs4. i could play the dvd on pcs and normal dvd player on the tv.
    But: Slide Show and all Movies are flickering. Menu also.
    Than i tryed Windows DVD Maker (Free when you have Ultimate Vista).
    I used there absolutely the same videos and photos. Result: Slide show and video quality was perfect and without flickering problems.
    I spent a lot of money and o can not believe that this free tool dvd maker is better than encore cs4.
    so please help me to solve this problem.
    I really don't know what i could try.
    Thank you and see you soon.

    Hi,
    Could somebody tell me which settings i should set on premiere cs4 to export in a good format to import to encore cs4?
    Maybe i could solve my problem on using the right settings on exporting a video from premiere cs4.
    Thank you

  • Why is Java better than c#. most people say c# is better

    I have entered forums and end up seeing informations on c# being better than java. Pls can any body tell me what makes java better than c#. This days every one i know is now going c#. They are discoraging me to also go c#.
    i am quite con fussed. The only thing that keeps me to JAVA is platform independence.

    Well, I suppose you can search Google for 'C# vs java' and read an article such as
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_Java_and_C_Sharp.
    However arguing which is better is best left as an exercise for developers with a lot of experience in both languages rather than those just starting out (If your just starting out, you will not use the advanced features one has over the other).
    I think the market will be evenly split between both languages for quite some time. Ideally, as a professional developer you should know both well so you are more employable. For Java, I suggest getting familiar with The Eclipse IDE since its used by the bulk of Java developers. For C#, I suggest you install Visual Studio Express because its used by the bulk of C# developers (and the express version is free).
    I suggest you first learn one or the other very very well and good coding practices before learning the other language to avoid mixing the two somewhat different coding styles.
    I suggest learning whichever language your friends are using assuming you communicate with them about programming often (so you can help each other). If instead your on your own, I suggest you learn Java. I think you will have an easier time picking up the Object Oriented philosophy than C# because in my opinion Java is more low level coding and C# is more high level coding (ie, the advanced features it can do a lot for you). You should have a good handle on the low level concepts first. In may opinion, once you know Java well, C# is a lot easier to pick up since they are both object oriented and are very similar object oriented languages.

  • Restricting prod order quantity from being higher than sales order quantty

    Dear Experts,
       I create production order interactively through co08 ( prod order with respect to sales order). the prod order automatically picks up the quantity in the sales order which is desired, but this order quantity field in the prod order is editable (i.e can be made higher or lower). Please how do I restrict this prod order quantity from being  higher than the sales order quantity?i mean what should be done to make system disallow the prod order qty being fixed higher than thesales order qty?

    Hi,
    Even though you create the production in refernce to the SO, the order quantity can be alter.
    This is a normal behaviour of the system.
    To restrict any change in the order quantity, you can use tarnsaction variant for CO08. T code is SHD0.
    Secondly you can use the following enhancements to restrict the same,
    PPCO0006
    PPCO0007
    Hope this helps you.
    SmanS

  • I have been filling up my internal memory on my laptop after years of video editing. I now want to export all this footage to an external hard drive. What is the proper way to do this.

    I have been filling up my internal memory on my laptop after years of video editing. I now want to export all this footage to an external hard drive. What is the proper way to do this.

    Are the videos being stored in iMovie or another application? Have you exported/shared the video? If the video is in iMovie what version of iMovie are you using? Give as much info as possible, and you may also want to post the question in the iLife section of this forum since more people with video skills will be reading the iLife/iMovie threads.

  • All the pages I visit are being bookmarked under Unsorted bookmarks. This is a breach of privacy since anyone can check my browsing history. How do I stop this?

    All the pages I visit are being bookmarked under Unsorted bookmarks. This is a breach of privacy since anyone can check my browsing history. How do I stop this? I have turned off Browsing History.

    Firefox doesn't bookmark pages automatically to the Unsorted folder unless you click the star on the location bar.
    Start Firefox in <u>[[Safe Mode]]</u> to check if one of the extensions is causing the problem (switch to the DEFAULT theme: Firefox (Tools) > Add-ons > Appearance/Themes).
    *Don't make any changes on the Safe mode start window.
    *https://support.mozilla.com/kb/Safe+Mode
    *https://support.mozilla.com/kb/Troubleshooting+extensions+and+themes

Maybe you are looking for

  • Do I begin by scanning my illustrator in a pdf and then save it as a png on illustrator?

    Do I begin by scanning my artwork as pdf and then saving it as a png on illustrator?

  • No DMM functions in functions palette

    Good Morning, I'm VERY new to labview but I'm starting to get the hang of it. Anyway i've been searching for hours and have been unable to find a solution to my issue. I'm running a NI PXIe-1078 chassis with PXIe-8101 controller  I'm trying to progra

  • Entire site won't work on home network...?

    Searched. My website www.renuauto.com won't work at all on my home network. I tried multiple computers and none of them will load the page. Switch to a neighbors network on the same computer, and it loads right up. Strange?

  • How to handle Event in JACOB API

    Hi, I am read the outlook mail using JACOB[Java Com Bridge] API successfully, now i want to handle events for outlook mail using JACOB. and also i can able to catch the new mail event. but i am unable to catch any deleted mail and move mail from one

  • OPMN PROBLEM - 10g - libmodapi.so not found

    Application Services Forms 10g (9.0.4) successful installed from fr_904_linux_disk1.cpio.gz but when I run opmn: error while loading shared libraries: libmodapi.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory bash-2.05b# ldd ./opmn libm