Allocation structure error 503
Hello all,
The amounts incurred for an investment order have been posted using a wrong GL and the posting is reversed since it was a mistake. That GL is not included in the allocation structure used in the order type. When we are trying to settle the order in KO88, even though the posting is reversed it is still giving the error for the GL to be included in the allocation structure.
Please let me know if anyone out there know what I am dealing with.
Thanks
Naresh
Hi Sadashivan.
The allocation structure that we use for investment orders has one cost element assigned in it. User posted a accounting document on to the order using another cost element. Later he realized that it is a mistake and reversed the document. when we go to KOB1 to see the amounts for the order this reveral is visible making the balance 0 on that cost element. But when I go to KO88 to settle the amounts the system won't let me because the order has a transaction with cost element that is not in the Allocation structure. So for me to settle these costs, I have to add this CE to my Allocation str. and send it to P, run my settlements and then delete the CE from Allocation str and send it to P again. I was hoping if there is a process to avaoid that.
Thanks
Naresh
Similar Messages
-
Error : complete allocation structure while doing Ko88 settlement.
Message no. KD503
Diagnosis
During settlement, the system puts the sender debits into groups (assignments), which are settled using the same settlement cost element. The settlement assignment is made in the allocation structure, which is stored in the settlement rule for the sender (under settlement parameters).
Cost element S10100 cannot be assigned to a settlement cost assignment in allocation structure A2, and therefore it cannot be assigned to a settlement cost element.
Procedure
Possible solutions are as follows:
If the posting under cost element S10100 was made to the sender because of an incorrect entry, and you can reverse the posting, and do not need to update the allocation structure. You only need to reverse the incorrectly assigned posting before repeating the settlement. Exception: For an investment measure with a line item settlement, you need to extend the allocation structure, even after the reversal.
If the posting was made correctly, you can do the following:
a) You can assign a different allocation structure to the sender: In the master data maintenance for the sender, choose "Settlement rule -> Goto -> Settlement parameters" and then enter a different allocation structure.
If necessary, also check whether the correct allocation structure is entered in the settlement profile. The allocation structure is defaulted in the settlement profile when you create sender master data or when you maintain the settlement rule.
You can update allocation structure A2Dear,
Please refer my reply in this thread,
Error in Rework order settlement
Regards,
R.Brahmankar -
Error In allocation Structure when doing settlement to GL from WBS
Hi All,
I got this error message. What should i do? I try to check my allocation structure...but it seem correct.
Complete allocation structure Z3
Message no. KD503
Diagnosis
During settlement, the system puts the sender debits into groups (assignments), which are settled using the same settlement cost element. The settlement assignment is made in the allocation structure, which is stored in the settlement rule for the sender (under settlement parameters).
Cost element 901000 cannot be assigned to a settlement cost assignment in allocation structure Z3, and therefore it cannot be assigned to a settlement cost element.
Procedure
Possible solutions are as follows:
If the posting under cost element 901000 was made to the sender because of an incorrect entry, and you can reverse the posting, and do not need to update the allocation structure. You only need to reverse the incorrectly assigned posting before repeating the settlement. Exception: For an investment measure with a line item settlement, you need to extend the allocation structure, even after the reversal.
If the posting was made correctly, you can do the following:
a) You can assign a different allocation structure to the sender: In the master data maintenance for the sender, choose "Settlement rule -> Goto -> Settlement parameters" and then enter a different allocation structure.
If necessary, also check whether the correct allocation structure is entered in the settlement profile. The allocation structure is defaulted in the settlement profile when you create sender master data or when you maintain the settlement rule.
You can update allocation structure Z3Hi Sreenivas ,
The accounting document looks weird :
Hi,
Settlement profile : ZPS001
GL, CC, Order, WBSE and FXA optional
Document type : SA (GL Account doc)
Distribution rule : 10
Residence time : 24
Allocation strucutre Z3
Default object type : FXA
tick on % settlement and equivalence no
to be settled in full
Allocation structure : Z3
Assignment : 1.Labour ,2.MAterial, 3. Subcontract
Source : 1. PSlabour , 2.PSmaterial 3. PSsubcon 4.Cost
Settlement cost center : FXA (ticl by CE), CTR (settlement cost element 90200) ; ORD (Settlement cost element 902001); GL put 747100f
I already successfully settle from WBS to GL 747100(settlement receiver) However, when i check FB03 it shows that
GL account 747100
Posting key 40
Amount 25000
GL Account 747100
Posting key 50
Amount -25000
What the problem ?
Cheers,
Nies -
We are getting the following error "Complete allocation structure GA"
Hi,
Please help on the below issue:-
We are carrying settlement of order (Period end activities ) for CO88 . We are getting the following error complete allocation structure GA.
Please guide us.
Regards
SrinivasHi,
Go to Allocation structure and maintain the Source and Settlement cost element for various cost groups in the structure.
And maintain this Allocation Structure in the settlement profile for your Production/Process orders.
Regards
Balaji -
Message no. KD503 - Complete allocation structure K1 for Internal Order
Hi,
During Internal order settlement through KO88 I am getting this error as :
Message no. KD503 - Complete allocation structure K1
Diagnosis :
During settlement, the system puts the sender debits into groups (assignments), which are settled using the same settlement cost element. The settlement assignment is made in the allocation structure, which is stored in the settlement rule for the sender (under settlement parameters). Cost element 430500 cannot be assigned to a settlement cost assignment in allocation structure K1, and therefore it cannot be assigned to a settlement cost element.
Procedure :
Possible solutions are as follows:
o If the posting under cost element 430500 was made to the sender because of an incorrect entry, and you can reverse the posting, and do not need to update the allocation structure. You only need to reverse the incorrectly assigned posting before repeating the settlement. Exception: For an investment measure with a line item settlement, you need to extend the allocation structure, even after the reversal.
o If the posting was made correctly, you can do the following:
a) You can assign a different allocation structure to the sender: In the master data maintenance for the sender, choose
"Settlement rule -> Goto -> Settlement parameters" and then enter a different allocation structure. If necessary, also check whether the correct allocation structure is entered in the settlement profile. The allocation structure is defaulted in the settlement profile when you create sender master data or when you maintain the settlement rule.
- You can update allocation structure K1
The same configuration in Development Server there is no error but problem occurs in Quality server. Here the process is Internal Order creation - Creation of Reservation through MB21- Goods Issue against reservation through MB1A and finally settlement through KO88. During settlement this error occur. In configuration setting of allocation structure under Internal Order I have mentioned only revenue settlement (as per business) against assignments. Under source mentioned cost element group and under settlement cost elment Receiver Cat is "CTR" and tick "By Cost Element".
During MB1A i.e, goods issue accounting entry is generated as
81(Dr). 430500 Constimptuion Saprae and Stores
99(Cr). 310411 Inventory Machinery and Spare.
During settlement this debit figure should credit. But not allowiing to credit. Even in configuration under settlement cost element if I remove the tick of "By cost element" and mention secondary gl account whose cost element category is 21, still showing the same error in QA server. What may be the probabale solution ? Even if i remove allocation structure K1 from settlement profile 20 still same error exist. How this link gets during settlment inspite of removing allocation structure from settlement profile...
NB.. COPA is not implemented in our company. So PA structure should not arrise here....
Thanks & regards,
Samrat
Edited by: Samrat Roy on Aug 30, 2010 7:28 PMHi Samrat,
The issue is very simple.. Cost element 430500 is posted in your IO...
While settling you have 2 options... Either you can credit the original GL account 430500.. This happens when you tick "By Cost element".. This you have done already...
2nd option is not to tick "By Cost element" and assign a secondary cost ele category 21...
But for any of these options to work, you have to include GL 430500 in the "source"... The above 2 options apply only to those GL accounts which are mentioned in the "Source".... for rest of the GL accounts, system gives this error
Include 430500 in your "source" cost ele group.. Error will be resolved
Regards
Ajay M -
'Structured' error handling and reentrancy
The parentheses in the subject are due to the fact that I'm not using the Structured Error Handler reference library, but have rolled my own to do something similar but in the manner I want it to. I don't actually use the SEH (haven't even got it installed at the moment on this PC) so am not sure exactly how it works under the hood.
I have a reasonably large application with a number of distinct parallel modules (GUI, state module, communication, motion control). The final parallel module is an error handling module. This consists of two queues - one for incoming errors, and one for outgoing actions. Errors are dequeued and their codes checked for their category (critical, warning, ignore or unclassified, for instance) and the appropriate category is returned to a local error handler via the action queue. When an error is passed to a local error handler VI, it enqueues the error to the main handler and waits for a response to that particular error.
This all works nicely, in much the same way the SEH would do. However, with either the SEH or my local error handler method, I find myself wondering how often to place these down and the consequences of doing so. If they're non-reentrant, I imagine I may end up with lots of parallel processes sitting patiently to access the VI as it's blocked by another, causing jitter. If I go pre-allocated clone, I could potentially have many many callers using this function, which strikes me as a bit of a waste of resources. My gut feel is to go with shared-allocation clones, as the vast majority of the time it'll be no error passed through an empty case, and not to place them in absolutely every subVI - just perhaps after a state executes in the state handler, in all the parallel loops of the submodules etc.
Just wondering what anyone else does with their error handling solution, and whether my thoughts make sense.
CLDHaving chatted to my friendly neighbourhood Spiderman Architect, he suggested I should probably just stop being a wimp and just use pre-allocated clones to avoid the jitter and to stop worrying about the resource hit, as you suggest
I'll use the same code on both PC host and RT host, hence the jitter concerns on the RT.
Thanks for the thoughts!
CLD -
Enter an existing allocation structure - Message No: KD013
Hi Experts,
While creating the Internal Order I am getting below error. We are using SAP from last 7 years with same Internal Order Types
Enter an existing allocation structure
Message no. KD013
Diagnosis
You have entered a settlement structure which does not exist.
Procedure
Enter an existing settlement structure or define a new one in the implementation guide.thanks for your quick reply.
I find out the solution.
T.CODE: OKO6
SPRO - Controlling - Internal Orders - Actual Postings - Settlement - Maintain Allocation Structures
We have maintained Allocation Structure which we have assigned in Order Types.
T.CODE: KOAL
Thanks & Regards,
Vijay -
Allocation Structure, Settlement issue
Dear All,
I have created a Allocation Structure with following details:
Allocation Structure: XX
Assignment: 01, 02, 03...
Co AREA: YYYY
In Source: I assigned relevant Cosat element groups
In Settelment Cost Elements: I assigned Secondary Cost elements
I have maintained the Settlement rule to settle WBS to CTR in CJ20N.
I have also checked that Allocation Structure XX is comming in Settlement paramters in the WBS (CJ20N)
After few postings on WBS element i get an error "Maintain sources for allocation structure A1 (this is pointing to a different allocation structure) in controlling area YYYY"
Ques 1: Is there any other config to be maintained required to Settle the Project to CTR.
Ques 2: In the settlement Profile what Document type i need to maintain?? Is this mandatory?
Ques 3: Is it must to create a source structure?
Warm Regards,
JatinderDear Gokul,
Yes this is newly configured allocation structure.
I have created a new settlement profile (where i have also assigned the new allocation structure) and assigned the Project profile.
Regards,
Jatinder -
WBS settlement issue:Complete allocation structure A1.Message no. KD503
hi all
I created an WBS 600041 and through FB60 posted the JV by assigning the WBS 600041.
Then I saw in CJI3 the posting is done and it is showing there and I created a settlement rule and gave the 100 % cost settlement on AUC and saved it. Now when I go to CJ88 and do the actual settlement and gave all the parameters for full settlement and execute it is giving the following error
Complete allocation structure A1.Message no. KD503
Is this problem due to cost elements? How do I go about it.please suggest.
kind regards
AmanHI,
Check your allocation structure OKO6 transaction. see whether your allocation structure is having the expense cost element you posted listed in it
OKO6- select your allocation structure-Assignments-source
Here the GL account should be listed
Regards,
Radha -
Hi,
When we execute the T.code KO88(Order Settlement for AUC), showing the below Error Message.
Complete allocation structure A1
Message no. KD503
Diagnosis
During settlement, the system puts the sender debits into groups (assignments), which are settled using the same settlement cost element. The settlement assignment is made in the allocation structure, which is stored in the settlement rule for the sender (under settlement parameters).
Cost element 410006 cannot be assigned to a settlement cost assignment in allocation structure A1, and therefore it cannot be assigned to a settlement cost element.
Procedure
Possible solutions are as follows:
If the posting under cost element 410006 was made to the sender because of an incorrect entry, and you can reverse the posting, and do not need to update the allocation structure. You only need to reverse the incorrectly assigned posting before repeating the settlement. Exception: For an investment measure with a line item settlement, you need to extend the allocation structure, even after the reversal.
If the posting was made correctly, you can do the following:
a) You can assign a different allocation structure to the sender: In the master data maintenance for the sender, choose "Settlement rule -> Goto -> Settlement parameters" and then enter a different allocation structure.
If necessary, also check whether the correct allocation structure is entered in the settlement profile. The allocation structure is defaulted in the settlement profile when you create sender master data or when you maintain the settlement rule.
You can update allocation structure A1
We have assigned Cost element for Receiver Cat. FXA.
What is the Problem?
Thanks in advanceIn the allocation structure you need to include the source CE 410006.
Allocation Structure>Assignments (double click)>Source (double click)
Here in source you should have the CE mention in From else you should have created a CE group including this CE.
And now for this source ensure you've maintained the Settlement cost element (for FXA) either 'By Cost Element' or Settlement cost element.
Regards
Sreenivas -
Complete Allocation Structure A1
Hi everyone,
I have a problem concerning settlement of orders. Running transaction va88 gives me an error message stating that I should complete allocation structure a1. However, this is not the allocation structure I want to use. The message says that I can assign a different allocaton structure to the sender by chosing Settlement Rule --> Goto --> Settlement Parameters in the master data of the sender.
Now my question is where to find the master data of the sender!? Thanks for your help!
Regards,
MartinHi,
I have solved this issue now. Changed the allocation structure. Now I still have one problem concerning an account which is not maintained in the strucutre. However, to assign this cost element to the right part of the structure is something my controlling people have to figure out.
Thanks anyway for all you help.
Regards,
martin -
Complete Allocation Structure A1 in K088
Every month end, we settle IO unused supplies to inventory accounts (using KO88) but last July 2011 until today, system prompts this error: "Complete Allocation Structure A1"? Can anyone please help me resolve the error? Upon checking the settlement allocation structure, the master data and parameters seems all accurate. Please help resolve this issue. Thank you all in advance.
hi Gracey
your error msg. must be showing some cost element missing in the allocation structure.
Kindly maintain the same in A1...
Check the link below
Message no. KD503 - Complete allocation structure K1 for Internal Order
Regards,
Divraj -
Hi SAP,
I am having a problem to make settlement for Work Order. i have created a new Cost Element (90500014) but system does not allow the Work Order to be settled. Is there any configuration i have to do (SPRO)? eg: OKO6 and OKO7. If yes, how? since i have no experience in this Txn.
Btw, i received error message (NA KD503) Short text - Complete allocation structure MK.
Promise will give points for those who help me out.
TQ
Regards,
NazrulHi,
Yes, you need to maintian the created cost element as source in OKO6 or in OKEU.
Hope this helps.
Rewards points if useful.
Regards,
Harish -
Allocation structure maintenance
Hi Experts
How do i add a cost element in the cost element group to include it as a source in OKO6?
one of the users was trying to settle internal orders but got an error " KD503 - Complete allocation structure Z1" the error went on to say cost element 480010 needs to be included in the Z1 allocation structure.
only problem is that when i go into the structure under Source, there is a cost element group already maintained with 4 other cost elements, i want to add this cost element (480010) into the group.
please help
ThanksHi Srikanth,
i have tried adding the cost element into the desire group, and it didnt give me any errors. i asked the user to try and settle the order and it was successful. thank you so much.
if i may ask, what impact is this change going to have the system, because the user says he just want to enter it settle it then remove it again from that group.
initially i had suggested that he should reverse the posting, but he said it would be a long process because the payment has been done and they got discounts for it.
what effect do you think this will have on the system or in reporting? -
Allocation Structure in CO Assignment Settlement Missing
Hi,
Pls help i am facing an issue to allocation Structure in CO Assignment Settlement while CO88
For referance error massage no. KD506. i got to know i need to assign the cost elements but where and which ? That help i need from experts with bit more understandable. If possible document with screenshots is help to get resolve the issue.
Thanks in advance.
Milind JoshiHi...
if you double-click on the message it will show you what are the cost elements that are not assigned yet.
You need to access the allocation structure you use (it should be in the error message) and proceed with adding the respective cost element to complete the settlement. (transaction OKO6->pick allocation structure)
Hope it helps.
Panagiotis
ps...in case you still have issues could you write down the entire message as it appears when you double click on it?
Maybe you are looking for
-
0SD_C03 Sales Overview and Vendor Information
Hello, I am using BI 2004s with Business Content 3.5. I would like to create a sales report such as sales by vendor. I am using the Sales Overview cube 0SD_C03 and tried to use the vendor information as an attribute from the material characteristic
-
Why does emptying the garbage take so long now? It has greatly slowed down my workflow.
Before Mountain Lion and maybe even Lion came out emptying the trash was instantaneous... What the **** happened. Now if my hardrive gets full and I have a **** load of stuff to remove it takes HOURS to do so. This is ridiculous, why does it take so
-
Hi there, I'm a photographer that carries my iPad 2 16gb everywhere with me. So when I'm out and about I want to be able to transfer and look at my pictures on my iPad. I want to take some pictures and plug in a card reader to tranfer the photo's on
-
is there a way to open a link in a new window after creating a menu with project -> skin?
-
I purchased adobe cs3 by download and have documents to prove purchase that no longer connect me to the site to re-download my purchase. I was forced to change from microsoft XP and to install Microsoft Windows. How do I access my purchase to downloa