Alocate download limits for wireless clients

Currently I am having an ADSL2 connection which I share with four users. The download limit is 16G per month. Is there any way for me to alcate a certain amount per each user? ex: 4G per user

As you can give the download speed limit but you can't give the limitation (range) for download.

Similar Messages

Initial configuration of ACS 5.1 for EAP authentication for Wireless clients

Hi,
I have set-up with below devices :
Wireless LAN controller 5508
LAP 3302i
and ACS 5.1
since i am new in ACS 5.1 configuration , I need so information to go ahead to configure ACS 5.1.
which EAP method to use for wireless client authentication ? what is the best practice ?
I have gone through some cisco documents and it shows that best practice is to configure PEAP but for the same , I need to install certificate in ACS server as well in client PC. is that so ?
I have no clear picture for this certificate ?
from where i can get this certificate or do i need to purchase this certificate separately from cisco. how to install it in ACS server ?
I will be obliged to get atleast initial configuration for ACS 5.1 to enable the EAP method,
I need GUI based initial configuration for ACS 5.1
This mentioned ACS 5.1 is installed on ACS 1121 hardware appliance.

Hi,
which EAP method to use for wireless client authentication ? what is the best practice ?
-> I would advise the most widely spread EAP method, which has the best ratio security/easy to deploy: PEAP with MSCHAPv2, which is available by default by all windows machines.
I have gone through some cisco documents and it shows that best practice is to configure PEAP but for the same , I need to install certificate in ACS server as well in client PC. is that so ?
-> You will always need to install a server certificate, however, there is no need for client certificate because the authentication is based on the MSCHAP credentials exchange, not certificate based. The only requirement on the client regarding certificates is the following.
If you want to validate the server certificate, you have to install the server certificate under the trusted CAs of the clients.
If you do not require to trust the server certificate, you can simply disable the option of server certificate validation.
I have no clear picture for this certificate ?
from where i can get this certificate or do i need to purchase this certificate separately from cisco. how to install it in ACS server ?
-> The server certificate can be a simple self signed certificate that you generate and install on the ACS GUI.
Please feel free to follow this step-by-step guide on
PEAP under Unified Wireless Networks with ACS 5.1 and Windows 2003 Server:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/partner/products/ps10315/products_configuration_example09186a0080b4cdb9.shtml or in pdf
http://www.cisco.com/image/gif/paws/112175/acs51-peap-deployment-00.pdf.
HTH,
Tiago
If this helps you and/or answers your question please mark the question as "answered" and/or rate it, so other users can easily find it.

Where is the download link for SCEP Client Offline installer for x86 & x64 altest greatest version (4.6.305 as of today)

Where is the download link for SCEP Client Offline installer for x86 & x64 latest greatest version (4.6.305 as of today)?
The answer IS NOT IT AND NEVER WILL BE "DOES NOT EXIST"!!!!!! MUST NEVER NEED TO RUN UPDATES TO GET IT!!!!!!!!! THE ONLY ACCEPTABLE ANSWER IS THE LINK!!!!! DUH GET YOUR ACT IN GEAR MS!!!!!!!!!!
Ralph

Thanks to all for the information. I work in higher ed. We have SCCM latest version, fully licensed. Unfortunately the individual who manages the SC does not have a clue as to where to find the SCEP installer. I sent him links from MS that shows him where
it is supposed to be. The version he say's is on our SC Management server is 4.3. I, in the past, was able to get 4.5 independent of him and it has been working well for me but it is time to use the latest greatest version instead. I should just as easily
be able to get 4.6. As far as licensing goes, if the product was correctly designed it should just work itself out just like it does for the 4.5 version I was able to easily find and download.
As for the link given by KevinMJohnston, thanks by the way, its the closest I have come to getting what I need but all I get is a spinning wheel in Firefox, the only browser one should ever need. In IE I get prompted for an email address, which it should
NEVER EVER DO!!!!!!!!!! I did give them my address, but alas, after waiting over 30 mins. I still don't have a link to the update or the CU4 Config MGR update mentioned. (Another reason I am not very nice to MS, along with, see below...) Please send me the
link that they are suppose to send me in the email.
As for the intensity of the request it comes from not being able to find the update on my own. (Amongst a million other complaints as MS makes my job harder and harder, just think of all the lost productivity and extra repair efforts needed because MS stopped
allowing you to do upgrade/repair installs from the install discs. You have to have a working OS to do it, or you will lose your settings etc and will have to re-install all of your software etc. How STUPID IS THAT! Can't use it to fix a blown driver or BSOD
problem like you could in XP. There is no excuse for that, I know better. So you can see why I have nothing good to say about MS etc etc.) There is no excuse for that! If the MS updater has it available then IT MUST BE MADE AVAILABLE FOR STANDALONE DOWNLOAD
PERIOD. That goes for ALL updates PERIOD. I use these updates and many others etc so that once I seal an image for a PC it has the latest greatest version of everything. It is quicker to get it stand alone in advance and installing than waiting for MS
updates to do so. Also I prefer to config my images so that the Av installs after first boot. These are cloned PCs. Many of these PC are used in labs and are frozen. Here, the settings for the SCEP AV being pushed from above can cause major problems for the
users i.e. the scheduled scan feature. If it is on when students are taking tests and they take more than 5 or 10 mins on question MS is stupid enough to start scanning causing the system to become unresponsive. This has caused students to breakdown in tears
thinking the system is hosed and they just lost their tests. I have to do some creative reg hack, setting owner as "Guest", a disabled account, etc. to keep these settings from being changed. (Our SC managers push policies that work for the faculty
but break the lab systems which are frozen, so I have to out hack them, should not be, but it is, we are trying to get that fixed, but bureaucracy and people afraid to share power etc makes it hard.) These settings unfortunately will prevent the AV from
installing so I need to be able to manually do it after I have set the reg to allow it. And I could go on. Who knows when or why someone may need to do a manual update of something. I just had 3 systems fail 12 updates, yet when I manually downloaded
them and installed them they ALL installed without failure. I did NOTHING in between the auto update and the manual, yet it was the manual way that worked. Maybe if MS could fix those kind of issues then no one would need to get stand alone update files.)
That is not for MS to worry about. It is, however, their responsibility to make it so that I can choose what will work best for my environment, which only I could know. DUH. I have had issues in the past with MS AV and other brands being installed before "sealing"
the images. etc. etc. etc.
As you can see, there is not enough space on the world wide web to list all thousands of legitimate reasons to give Microsoft a hard time so I will do so on a case by case bases knowing I am probably spitting in to the wind, but hey somebody has to have
the guts to do it. MS MUST NEVER BE ALLOWED TO SIMPLY GET AWAY WITH IT! They Must be called to the proverbial carpet.
Maybe if people who are MVPs would not be afraid to join the choruses they would be embarrassed, (though it should be done out of moral obligation not embarrassment), enough to fix these obviously fixable problems etc. etc. etc. I have over 30 years in the
IT business, the IBM XT did not exist until my senior year in college. You are not going to be able to convince me that there is a legitimate reason, copy protection IS NOT IT, to prevent me from fixing blown OS via re-install using install disc when OS will
not boot. Nor are you going to be able to find legitimate reason for the SCEP 4.6.305 update to be so hard to get.
Thanks again for the help, still waiting for email from MS, NOT COOL MS! NO EXCUSE!!!!!
Ralph

Network printers drop for wireless clients

I am having a serious problem with my Airport N. My Epson CF11NF (a laser all-in-one which is connected via ethernet to the Airport) is continuously disappearing for wireless clients. All the wired machines can see and print fine, but the printer becomes invisible for wireless clients. The problem is resolved by unplugging and plugging back in the Airport, but I am having to do this more than once a day, which is not acceptable.
Has anyone experienced this problem? Any advice on what is going on? Should I return the Airport? The wireless clients are all running OSX 10.5.1. The wired clients are all running OSX 10.4. Could this be the issue?

Others are having similar issues and symptoms, however, I've seen no solutions yet. My Airport Extreme disappears also but access to the internet is unaffected. I can also still access my iMac from my MacBook (iMac still shows up in Finder as a shared volume), however, once the AEBS drops from view I can no longer access printers on the network. (One connected to a networked PC and the other connected to the AEBS.) Both Macs are running Leopard.
Anyway here's a link that others are using to discuss these issues. Good Luck. http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?threadID=1197872

Wireless 3850 and Web-Auth for Wireless clients

Hi
I can't get the web-auth feature to work properly on the Catalyst 3850 for wireless clients.
Internet is all tested and there is full IP connectivity.
Issue is when I enable the webauth feature on the SSID. Incidentally when I enable the SSID to use consent it works.
I am using local authentication for the guest users.
When user logs onto the wireless, they get to the landing page, and are able to enter the credentials then there is a 30 second pause. The client detail says WEBAUTH_PEND and then a pop up window comes back as seen below
Config below
interface Vlan302
description **** Wireless Guest ****
ip address 10.145.224.161 255.255.255.224
ip helper-address 10.144.214.134
ip helper-address 172.17.2.56
ip http server
ip http secure server
ip dhcp snooping
wlan XXXXX 2 XXXXXX
aaa-override
accounting-list default
client vlan 302
ip flow monitor wireless-avc-basic input
ip flow monitor wireless-avc-basic output
no security wpa
no security wpa akm dot1x
no security wpa wpa2
no security wpa wpa2 ciphers aes
security dot1x authentication-list WEB_AUTH
security ft
security web-auth
security web-auth authentication-list WEB_AUTH
security web-auth parameter-map vit_web
no shutdown
parameter-map type webauth vit_web
type webauth
security web-auth parameter-map vit_web
user-name Guest1
creation-time 1390837878
privilege 15
password 7 022D0156060F1B351D
type network-user description Temp-Guest-User guest-user lifetime year 0 month 1 day 0 hour 0 minute 0 second 0
user-name Guest2
creation-time 1390838016
privilege 15
password 7 0724244143000D1145
type network-user description Temp-Guest-User guest-user lifetime year 0 month 1 day 0 hour 0 minute 0 second 0
aaa new-model
aaa authentication login WEB_AUTH local
aaa authorization network WEB_AUTH local

Hey Greg,
Did you also define the global webauth parameter? I think I had to do this to get my 5760 "working" or as working as these new controllers can be.
parameter-map type webauth global
type webauth
virtual-ip ipv4 x.x.x.x wlc.whatever.org
max-http-conns 50
Also I had to enable http server in addition to secure server
ip http server
ip http secure-server
Are you using a self signed cert?
I saw windows clients take a long time to load the page when using a self signed cert.
MAC clients dont seem to work if you use the IOS or OSX based logon. You'll need to disable the auto logon and launch a browser for the redirect. There was a bug ID around this MAC problem which was supposedly resolved in 3.3.1SE but I still have the problem.
-Kyle

Bridge does not work for wireless clients - connecting to existing network.

Hi - I really hope somebody can help out here, after hours of trial & error, I have finally given up
I need to connect my Airport Extreme Base Station to my existing network. I have a linksys router (192.168.15.1) connected to my modem and this linksys router acts as DHCP server too.
I suppose I have to use "bridge mode" for that to work. But should the linksys be connected to the AEBS using the AEBS's WAN or LAN port?
If I use "bridge mode", then wired computers to the AEBS works fine - getting an IP from the linksys etc. BUT, the wireless clients will have a self-assigned IP and not get through to the internet. It's like the AEBS will not allow wireless clients to "get through" unless AEBS itself is handing out IP addresses.
Page 36 of this manual ( http://manuals.info.apple.com/en/DesigningAirPort_Networks10.5-Windows.pdf ) shows the setup I want. But in the picture, it says "Ethernet WAN port" but the text says: "The Apple wireless device (in this example, a Time Capsule) uses your Ethernet network to communicate with the Internet through the Ethernet LAN port ( <--> )." I don't know which one to use, WAN or LAN - they show WAN but say LAN?
When I set it up as "share an IP address", the AEBS status tells me "double nat" and to change from "shared IP" to "bridge mode". I do that, and everything seems fine - for the wired clients. Now the wireless clients cannot connect, Airport on the MacBook Pro just say "Connection failed" and the MacBook says "Invalid password" (translated from danish), even though I set the Airport Utlity to save the password in keyring, so it should be correct... If I disable wireless encryption, the wireless clients will connect but get a self-assigned IP, and therefor not work (cannot get online)...
It seems the only way I can get wireless to work, is if I set AEBS up as DHCP, but then it won't be on the "same network" as the linksys (192.168.15.1), but rather on 10.0.x.x as I select. If I select 192.168.x.x within AEBS, I'm also getting some error messages, conflict/subnet thing.
Anyway - I really hope somebody knows how to get wireless clients to get an IP address from existing ethernet when connected to the AEBS.
Thanks!!

I've given up and had to go back to running "Double NAT" which also reports as a "problem" within the AEBS, but I just "ignore" it so the light will always be green.
It still ***** though, as "Double NAT" is also a reason for "Back to my Mac" not working properly, but how the ** am I supposed to avoid Double NAT when the wireless will not work in bridged mode?!

Can router dhcp different addresses to different vlans for wireless clients

is it possible for the router to hand out different ip's to wireless clients on different vlans?

Yes, the router needs to have a dhcp pool on each subnet and have an "interface Vlan x" for each vlan. It will then assign ips to clients in different vlans.
One vlan per SSID.

WRT54GX2 Wireless Security Enabled DHCP blocked for wireless clients

Hey gang,
My subject says it all. Yesterday I updated my WRT54GX2 version 1's firmware to the latest and greatest.I first reset the box, and rebooted. I updated the firmware. On the first attempt I picked the wrong image file. The machine halted and told me bad image. I then found and installed the correct image. I then added an Admin password, and entered a new SSID. I left the DHCP settings at the default. I then set wireless security at WPA Personl/WPA2 with TKIP&AES.
I found the wired client could obtain an IP address and to connect to the internet. The wireless clients could connect, but could not obtain an IP address.
I left the wireless security settings off.
Any suggestions?

The wireless security settings are correct. The wireless clients "CONNECT" to the WRT54GX2. The clients stall on obtaining an IP address via DHCP. Fixing the clients with static IP addresses also does not work.
I repeat: The wireless clients successfully connect to the WRT54GX2. The WPA/WPA2 & TKIP/AES settings are correct. The clients cannot receive a dynamic IP address.
On Friday I will reset the box for 30+ seconds. I doubt this will have any effect. I reset it on Tuesday twice on Tuesday, and still have the problem.
Any help appreciated.
-WJ

What are steps configure Certificate based authentication for Wireless clients with ACS 5.3?

I need to autheticate my clients connecting via wireless.
clients have user certificate installed on them, i need help configuring the ACS to do the authentication.
can some one please help me with the steps.
Thanks

Two primary steps
- define the trust certificates needed to verify the clients user certificates
Users and Identity Stores > Certificate Authorities
- change result of identity policy to select a certificate authorization profile. If have the defautl config
Access Policies > Access Services > Default Network Access > Identity
by default can select the "CN Username" as a result

SNMP OID for wireless client

Dear Netpro Community,
I would like to know whether the following OID talks about the number wireless clients joining the AP at which OSI layer.
Rgrds,
Beno

Sry, the oid information is here:
Object cDot11ActiveWirelessClients
OID 1.3.6.1.4.1.9.9.273.1.1.2.1.1
Type Gauge32
Permission read-only
Status current
Units Device
Range 0 - 2007

Cisco ISE - Computer and User Authenticiation on AD for Wireless Clients.

Hello all,
I am trying to configure Cisco ISE to authenticate/authorize Wireless access with PEAP MsChapv2.
The AD user authorization works fine, but I cannot see on the logs a challenge for the computer verification (it must be a domain member).
I have found an attribute I would use for this action, but I cannot use it, because I don't see the challenge for the computer challenge.
Can you explain me if this fact is involved by the ISE configuration or by the client configuration ?
Thanks a lot for your help.
The followings screenshots show the logs appearing in the ISE :
Kind regards, Emeric.

This is a great question and I wanted to add my input and I have a question as well. My understanding in order to do both Machine and User EAP-Chaining is required, which used EAP-FAST.
In my testing, when a domain box is configured for computer/user authentication. When the laptop started up it will authenticate with a host/ and sid in the log.
When the user logs in you then see the user ID.
For my benefit when rule are you talking about ?
Thank you

Bandwidth Management for Wireless Clients

We are looking at putting in a solution at a hotel for Free Guest WiFI
The solution would cover 4 floors and about 120 rooms and some open areas .
In short the hardware would look as follows
2500 controller
1142LAP
2960 PoE switch
878 Adsl router for internet connectivity (20Mbps/1Mbps internet ADSL feed)
One of the concerns raised by the client is that they would like to make sure that no single user could eat up too much bandwidth creating problems for the rest of the users .
Can the above KIT or something similar achieve this objective? As far as I can think of we would require a Proxy server .
Thank you

Hi Scott,
Thank you for your response.
It would be better for users to not have to log on against a web interface. As this is a hotel they would not want to have the admin effort of creating/enabling/disabling users especially since this will be free.
Instead what would suit their needs is a sort of a protection mechanism against "crazy big" downloads . Ideally without the need of a 3rd party that would require them to buy a server as well .
Thanks
Michalis

Does LAN leave more signal for wireless clients?

This may seem like a silly question, but...
My main computer is next to the extreme base station. If I run an LAN to it, will it essentially leave more signal for the 2 iMacs upstairs to access wirelessly?

Actually the question is far from silly...
And you are right, while the Extreme can handle a large number of computers simultaneously, there IS a limit on bandwidth. So if the two upstairs iMacs were busy copying some files between each other, and you started downloading something from the internet on your main computer, it is possible that would cause the copying between the iMacs to slow down. But if the main computer was connected via the LAN port, the iMacs would be unaffected (assuming the Extreme can handle all the data on its internal circuitry at those rates).
I think the real question is how likely is the above scenario? If a computer is not actively using the wireless (actually sending or receiving data) then the bandwidth is preserved. It might just boil down to which is most convenient...
MacBook Pro Mac OS X (10.4.8)

DHCP only works for wireless clients on Time Capsule. How to fix?

Hi All,
I have a question concerning the DHCP server on my Time Capsule. I'm posting here because I think you network pros lurking in this forum probably have way more insightful advice than the n00bs in the Time Capsule forum
My DHCP server on the Time Capsule only works for clients connected wirelessly to that specific access point; clients plugged directly into the network via ethernet and through other APs do not receive a DHCP assignment from the Time Capsule.
How can I get the Time Capsule to serve DHCP addresses to EVERYONE on the network, not just clients connected via the Time Capsule?
Thanks,
Chris

I don't know that TC provides that. Switch the TC over to its bridged mode (also known as an Access Point or AP), and run a DHCP Server on Mac OS X Server (fodder for this forum) or a DHCP server on another available device. Less desirable though feasible (so long as the IP address pools are coordinated and non-overlapping with other pools or static addresses), run multiple DHCP servers.

Cisco ISE 1.3 using 802.1x Authentication for wireless clients

Hi,
I have stumbled into a strange issue trying to authenticate a user over wireless. I am using PEAP as the authentication protocol. I have configured my authentication and authorization policy but when I come to authenticate the authorization policy selected is the default which denies access.
I have used the 802.1x compound conditions for matching the machine authentication and then the user authentication
MACHINE AUTHENTICATION
match
framed
Wireless
AD group (machine)
USER AUTHENTICATION
match
framed
Wireless
AD group (USER)
was authenticated = true
Below are steps taken to authenticate any ideas would be great.
11001 Received RADIUS Access-Request
11017 RADIUS created a new session
15049 Evaluating Policy Group
15008 Evaluating Service Selection Policy
15048 Queried PIP
15048 Queried PIP
15048 Queried PIP
15006 Matched Default Rule
11507 Extracted EAP-Response/Identity
12300 Prepared EAP-Request proposing PEAP with challenge
11006 Returned RADIUS Access-Challenge
11001 Received RADIUS Access-Request
11018 RADIUS is re-using an existing session
12302 Extracted EAP-Response containing PEAP challenge-response and accepting PEAP as negotiated
12318 Successfully negotiated PEAP version 0
12800 Extracted first TLS record; TLS handshake started
12805 Extracted TLS ClientHello message
12806 Prepared TLS ServerHello message
12807 Prepared TLS Certificate message
12810 Prepared TLS ServerDone message
12305 Prepared EAP-Request with another PEAP challenge
11006 Returned RADIUS Access-Challenge
11001 Received RADIUS Access-Request
11018 RADIUS is re-using an existing session
12304 Extracted EAP-Response containing PEAP challenge-response
12305 Prepared EAP-Request with another PEAP challenge
11006 Returned RADIUS Access-Challenge
11001 Received RADIUS Access-Request
11018 RADIUS is re-using an existing session
12304 Extracted EAP-Response containing PEAP challenge-response
12305 Prepared EAP-Request with another PEAP challenge
11006 Returned RADIUS Access-Challenge
11001 Received RADIUS Access-Request
11018 RADIUS is re-using an existing session
12304 Extracted EAP-Response containing PEAP challenge-response
12318 Successfully negotiated PEAP version 0
12812 Extracted TLS ClientKeyExchange message
12804 Extracted TLS Finished message
12801 Prepared TLS ChangeCipherSpec message
12802 Prepared TLS Finished message
12816 TLS handshake succeeded
12310 PEAP full handshake finished successfully
12305 Prepared EAP-Request with another PEAP challenge
11006 Returned RADIUS Access-Challenge
11001 Received RADIUS Access-Request
11018 RADIUS is re-using an existing session
12304 Extracted EAP-Response containing PEAP challenge-response
12313 PEAP inner method started
11521 Prepared EAP-Request/Identity for inner EAP method
12305 Prepared EAP-Request with another PEAP challenge
11006 Returned RADIUS Access-Challenge
11001 Received RADIUS Access-Request
11018 RADIUS is re-using an existing session
12304 Extracted EAP-Response containing PEAP challenge-response
11522 Extracted EAP-Response/Identity for inner EAP method
11806 Prepared EAP-Request for inner method proposing EAP-MSCHAP with challenge
12305 Prepared EAP-Request with another PEAP challenge
11006 Returned RADIUS Access-Challenge
11001 Received RADIUS Access-Request
11018 RADIUS is re-using an existing session
12304 Extracted EAP-Response containing PEAP challenge-response
11808 Extracted EAP-Response containing EAP-MSCHAP challenge-response for inner method and accepting EAP-MSCHAP as negotiated
15041 Evaluating Identity Policy
15006 Matched Default Rule
22072 Selected identity source sequence
15013 Selected Identity Source - AD1
24430 Authenticating user against Active Directory
24325 Resolving identity
24313 Search for matching accounts at join point
24315 Single matching account found in domain
24323 Identity resolution detected single matching account
24343 RPC Logon request succeeded
24402 User authentication against Active Directory succeeded
22037 Authentication Passed
11824 EAP-MSCHAP authentication attempt passed
12305 Prepared EAP-Request with another PEAP challenge
11006 Returned RADIUS Access-Challenge
11001 Received RADIUS Access-Request
11018 RADIUS is re-using an existing session
12304 Extracted EAP-Response containing PEAP challenge-response
11810 Extracted EAP-Response for inner method containing MSCHAP challenge-response
11814 Inner EAP-MSCHAP authentication succeeded
11519 Prepared EAP-Success for inner EAP method
12314 PEAP inner method finished successfully
12305 Prepared EAP-Request with another PEAP challenge
11006 Returned RADIUS Access-Challenge
11001 Received RADIUS Access-Request
11018 RADIUS is re-using an existing session
12304 Extracted EAP-Response containing PEAP challenge-response
24423 ISE has not been able to confirm previous successful machine authentication
15036 Evaluating Authorization Policy
15048 Queried PIP
15048 Queried PIP
24432 Looking up user in Active Directory - xxx\zzz Support
24355 LDAP fetch succeeded
24416 User's Groups retrieval from Active Directory succeeded
15048 Queried PIP
15048 Queried PIP
15004 Matched rule - Default
15016 Selected Authorization Profile - DenyAccess
15039 Rejected per authorization profile
12306 PEAP authentication succeeded
11503 Prepared EAP-Success
11003 Returned RADIUS Access-Reject
5434 Endpoint conducted several failed authentications of the same scenario

24423 ISE has not been able to confirm previous successful machine authentication
Judging by that line and what your policy says, it appears that your authentication was rejected as your machine was not authenticated prior to this connection.
first thing to check is whether MAR has been enabled on the identity source. second thing to check is whether your machine is set to send a certificate for authentication. there are other things you can look at but I'd do those two first.
log off and on or reboot and then see if you at least get a failed machine auth on the operations>authentication page and we can go from there.

Alocate download limits for wireless clients

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for