Alternate Authentication for developers of QaaWS prior to 3.1

Great enhancement in 3.1 to allow all methods of authentication to be used by individuals creating QaaWS services.  Is there any plan to add this as a fix pack or service pack in the XI R2 series?

Hi Miriam,
As far as the architecture of BOXIR2 and BOXIR3.1 are concerned, ther are completely different and since there were many enhancement requests logged for this alternate authentication, this is introduced in XIR3.1.
So, as far as I am concerned, I would say that it would not be introduced in XIR2 even in future. However there is no concrete answer to your question, because if this is compatible to the current design of the product, it could be introduced in XIR2 too (but the chances are that it would not).
Hope this helps.
Regards,
Jay.

Similar Messages

  • Preview for Developers update for Windows Phone 8.1.1

    Start your phone updates
    Microsoft has just pushed out Windows Phone 8.1.1 for those participating in the Preview Developer Program.
    It's believed to fix the following issues:
    lingering issues with those not getting the Lumia Cyan firmware
    errors in installing
    and even a fix for HTC users
    Source: Microsoft rolling out Preview for Developers update for Windows Phone 8.1.1 | Windows Phone Central

    primortal wrote:
    This bit is interesting from the Windows Phone Blog in regards to this update.
    Remember, while we are releasing Lumia Cyan for a large number of phones, there still may be some of you that are not offered the Cyan update, yet. However, as explained in the blog, we’ll continue to add more Lumia devices every couple of days over the coming weeks until we bring everyone up to the latest.
    Source: New Update for Windows Phone Preview for Developers
    That Text is no where to be found in that blog post. Anywhere.

  • "Team Foundation Server" is preventing authentication for whole team !!

    I am getting 2 errors through the event viewer that prevents TFS 2013 authentication for local domain users, also this error started appearing after having TFS upgraded to [ 12.0.30723.0 (Tfs2013.Update3) ].
    1st
    Error (from administrative events):
    The Execute method of job definition Microsoft.SharePoint.Administration.SPUsageImportJobDefinition (ID a51a0244-765d-433b-8502-0bb0540ad1fd) threw an exception.
    More information is included below.
    Access to the path 'C:\Program Files\Common Files\Microsoft Shared\Web Server Extensions\15\LOGS' is denied.
    Tried so far:-
    - changed the path to another folder from "Diagnostic Logging" in another drive, but still getting the same error.
    2nd
    Error (from application server):
    DistributedCOM error
    The application-specific permission settings do not grant
    Local Activation permission for the COM Server application with CLSID 
    {000C101C-0000-0000-C000-000000000046}
     and APPID 
    {000C101C-0000-0000-C000-000000000046}
     to the user NT AUTHORITY\NETWORK SERVICE SID (S-1-5-20)
    from address LocalHost (Using LRPC). This security permission can be modified using the Component Services administrative tool.
    Which I already got fixed using the following steps on a thread I opened before (but still getting the same error).
    https://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/windows/en-US/3896e35c-b99a-4d30-b662-f92d337c8d6f/windows-servers-components-services-and-regedit-permissions-are-grayed-out-for-my-admin-account?forum=winservergen
    Other
    Fixes I tried
    - Found on another topic that it is not sharepoint that is causing the problem, but it is the generated ASP.NET web pages used for testing is causing the memory to fill up due to cashing on RAM, the fix suggested to change IIS cashing from RAM to HD to prevent
    loading up using w3wp.exe from processes. 
    Concern
    - by checking other topics for people having the same problem, it was mentioned that this error appeared after the lastest TFS update, is there is a fix for it ?

    Hi Amr,
    For your first error, you can change the "Diagnostic Logging" path, aslo change the path of the usage and health data connection the same with your ULS log location. Check this
    blog for more detils and make sure you follow the instructions. Restart SharePoint tracing service after the operations. You can also check this
    thread for more references. If you still have any other concerns about SharePoint, you can open a new thread in SharePoint forum for a better response.
    About the second error, seems it's not related to TFS. You can also run TFS best practice analyzer to check if there any configuation issues on your application tier server. However, you can also refer to this
    blog
    to get this issue resolved. If the problem persists, you can elaborate more details about your scenario and the reproduce steps or open a new thread related forum.
    Best regards,

  • "Sharepoint 2013" is giving error that prevents local domain users authentication for "Team Foundation Server"

    I am getting 2 errors through the event viewer that prevents TFS 2013 authentication for local domain users, also this error started appearing after having TFS upgraded to [ 12.0.30723.0 (Tfs2013.Update3) ].
    1st Error (from administrative events):
    The Execute method of job definition Microsoft.SharePoint.Administration.SPUsageImportJobDefinition (ID a51a0244-765d-433b-8502-0bb0540ad1fd) threw an exception. More information is included below.
    Access to the path 'C:\Program Files\Common Files\Microsoft Shared\Web Server Extensions\15\LOGS' is denied.
    Tried so far:-
    - changed the path to another folder from "Diagnostic Logging" in another drive, but still getting the same error.
    2nd Error (from application server):
    DistributedCOM error
    The application-specific permission settings do not grant Local Activation permission for the COM Server application with CLSID 
    {000C101C-0000-0000-C000-000000000046}
     and APPID 
    {000C101C-0000-0000-C000-000000000046}
     to the user NT AUTHORITY\NETWORK SERVICE SID (S-1-5-20) from address LocalHost (Using LRPC). This security permission can be modified using the Component Services administrative tool.
    Which I already got fixed using the following steps on a thread I opened before (but still getting the same error).
    https://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/windows/en-US/3896e35c-b99a-4d30-b662-f92d337c8d6f/windows-servers-components-services-and-regedit-permissions-are-grayed-out-for-my-admin-account?forum=winservergen
    Other Fixes I tried
    - Found on another topic that it is not sharepoint that is causing the problem, but it is the generated ASP.NET web pages used for testing is causing the memory to fill up due to cashing on RAM, the fix suggested to change IIS cashing from RAM to HD to prevent
    loading up using w3wp.exe from processes. 
    Concern
    - by checking other topics for people having the same problem, it was mentioned that this error appeared after the lastest TFS update, is there is a fix for it ?

    Hi Kpdn, 
    Thanks for your post.
    All your participation and support are very important to build such harmonious/ pleasant / learning environment for MSDN community.
    We are trying to better understand customer views on social support experience, so your participation in this interview project would be greatly appreciated if you have time. Thanks for helping make community forums a great place.
    Click
    HERE to participate the survey.

  • Open Authentication for Wireless Access

    Hello,
    The standalone implementation of an existing wireless network is configured as Open Authentication with a TKIP Cipher. The client key management is set to WPA PSK.
    What exacly is the authentication for? I see that MAC and EAP are available options. Would these options be used to block or authorize the actual wireless devices that connect to the AP?
    The next thing I see is Client Authenticated Key management and I am using WPA PSK. What exactly happens once I enter thsi PSK from the client? Is it only used to encrypt the data?
    Thanks,
    Kevin

    Hi Kevin,
    Using WPA we can configure  either Enterprise or pre shared key.. Enterprise comprises of EAP and pre shared key is just the PSK..
    if we are using EAP then auth will be done by the RADIUS and the encryotion will still be TKIP.. now coming back to PSK, this is shared key which will authenticate the users locally...
    EAP is more secured auth compared to PSK..
    Now regarding the "auth open" line.. see there are 2 kinds of auth in 802.11.. here while using wireless we need to auth twice, dot11 authentication and followed by the psk or EAP auth.. the auth open statement will force us to get the dot11 auth successful and then we move towards needed auth like PSK or EAP.. and another is Shared auth is very similar to WEP using open auth!!
    in the nut shel we have 3 kinds of auth..
    1> open - Dot11 auth
    2> Shared - Nothing but WEP
    3> 802.1X suite - EAP
    again, the below link may give you some insights as well!!
    http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/wireless/access_point/12.2_13_JA/configuration/guide/s13auth.html#wp1035025
    Lemme know if this answered ur question and please dont forget to rate the usefull posts!!
    Regards
    Surendra

  • User Authentication for subfolder not working in Web Browser

    We are using Oracle Application Server 10.1.2.3 and Database Server 10.2.0.5 for our application.
    One of the functionalities of the Application is to send emails with attachments.
    The logic is that the Application would generate the attachment file on the Application Server.
    Then a database package uses Oracle's utl_http package/procedures(more specifically utl_http.request_pieces where the single argument is a URL) to pick up the file from the Application Server via URL, attach the file and send the email.
    Exchange and Relay Server is also set in the Application.
    The problem is that the folder containing the folder which stores the attachments is having user authentication set.
    Example : The main folder is /apps/interface, this folder requires a valid user when it is accessed via URL on a web browser.
    Alias created in httpd.conf
    Alias /int-dir/ "/apps/interface/"
    The folder /apps/interface/email/ is the folder where the attachment files are generated and stored.
    Application Server : 10.12.213.21
    Database Server : 10.12.213.22
    Email Server : 10.12.213.44
    Configuration as per httpd.conf
    Alias /int-dir/ "/apps/interface/"
    <Location /int-dir/>
    AuthName "Interface folder"
    AuthType Basic
    AuthUserFile "/u01/app/oracle/as10g/oasmid/Apache/Apache/conf/.htpasswd"
    require user scott
    </Location>
    <Location /int-dir/email>
    Options Indexes Multiviews IncludesNoExec
         Order deny,allow
         Deny from all
         Allow from 10.12.213.21
         Allow from 10.12.213.22
         Allow from 10.12.213.44
    </Location>
    Using the above configuration the Application is able to attach the files and send the email, however, when we access the following URL :
    http://10.12.213.21:7778/int-dir/ - it prompts for user authentication
    However if we use the following URL :
    http://10.12.213.21:7778/int-dir/email/ - it does not prompt for user authentication, and all the files in the folder are displayed in the browser.
    I have tried so many things including AllowOverride, .htaccess, but i am not able to get user authentication for the email folder.
    Please help me if you can.
    Thanking you in advance,
    GLad to give any more information that i can.
    dxbrocky

    Thanks for your response.  I fixed the problem by selecting "full site" or "full website" at bottom of the web page.  After making this selection the zoom function returned.  Thanks again for your interest.

  • How to set up and test the Basic Authentication for HTTP protocol

    Hi,
    I tried configuring the password based Basic Authentication for sending xml document using ebMS - HTTP protocol. I set username and password while configuring the transport server for both trading partners. I want to know, is that sufficient for basic authenticaton. When I open the URI http://localhost:7778/b2b/transportServlet, it is not asking any authentication (username/password). Please note that I have not used SSL certificate. Anyone please help me out to configure Basic authentication.

    Hi Ramesh,
    Thanks for ur response. Could you please tell me where to set the Additional Transport header : authtype-basic#realm=myRealm(in which property file). In enqueue code, I could see the following attributes
    queue
    msgID
    replyToMsgID
    from
    to
    eventName
    doctypeName
    doctypeRevision
    msgType
    payload
    attachment
    subscriber
    Is it possible to set username/password in the enqueue attributes?
    Do i need to add username/password and Transport header in the input XML and defined that elements in xsd?

  • Authentication for multiple AD domains

    Hello,
    Currently we have MS AD datasource as UME for all our internal portal users. We also have spnego setup for authentication  for our EP 7.0 The user path and group path is of the form   dc=dom1 dc=company dc=domain dc=com.
    Now we are planning to add additional domains to authenticate users .
    Will the configuration differ if they are maintained on a different ldap server altogether or when only the user and group paths are different for the new domains as shown below?  The user path and group path is of the form dc=dom2,dc=company,dc=domain,dc=com and
    dc=dom3,dc=company,dc=domain,dc=com.
    It seems that we have to change the datasource file for the additional ldap scenario.But are both of these the same,Would appreciate if someone could clarify this.
    Rgds

    Vineeth,
    Within the 1 file, you can setup n-number of datasources.  Below is an example.
    As for having SPNego work for only 1 of those datasources (AD domains), I can't say if that will work.  We have SPNego working for all our domains.  There is probably something you can do within AD or your domain controller to limit Kerberos authentication.
    <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
    <!-- $Id: //shared_tc/com.sapall.security/630_SP_COR/src/_deploy/dist/configuration/shared/dataSourceConfiguration_ads_readonly_db.xml#6 $ from $DateTime: 2004/08/20 09:55:24 $ ($Change: 17140 $) -->
    <!DOCTYPE dataSources SYSTEM "dataSourceConfiguration.dtd">
    <dataSources>
         <dataSource id="PRIVATE_DATASOURCE1" className="com.sap.security.core.persistence.datasource.imp.DataBasePersistence" isReadonly="false" isPrimary="true">
              <homeFor>
                   <principals>
                        <principal type="group"/>
                        <principal type="user"/>
                        <principal type="account"/>
                        <principal type="team"/>
                        <principal type="ROOT"/>
                        <principal type="OOOO"/>
                   </principals>
              </homeFor>
              <notHomeFor/>
              <responsibleFor>
                   <principals>
                        <principal type="group"/>
                        <principal type="user"/>
                        <principal type="account"/>
                        <principal type="team"/>
                        <principal type="ROOT"/>
                        <principal type="OOOO"/>
                   </principals>
              </responsibleFor>
              <privateSection/>
         </dataSource>
        <dataSource id="PRIVATE_DATASOURCE2" className="com.sap.security.core.persistence.datasource.imp.DataBasePersistence" isReadonly="false" isPrimary="true">
                <homeFor>
                    <principals>
                        <principal type="group"/>
                        <principal type="user"/>
                        <principal type="account"/>
                        <principal type="team"/>
                        <principal type="ROOT"/>
                        <principal type="OOOO"/>
                    </principals>
                </homeFor>
                <notHomeFor/>
                <responsibleFor>
                    <principals>
                        <principal type="group"/>
                        <principal type="user"/>
                        <principal type="account"/>
                        <principal type="team"/>
                        <principal type="ROOT"/>
                        <principal type="OOOO"/>
                    </principals>
                </responsibleFor>
                <privateSection/>
        </dataSource>
        <dataSource id="PRIVATE_DATASOURCE3" className="com.sap.security.core.persistence.datasource.imp.DataBasePersistence" isReadonly="false" isPrimary="true">
                <homeFor>
                    <principals>
                        <principal type="group"/>
                        <principal type="user"/>
                        <principal type="account"/>
                        <principal type="team"/>
                        <principal type="ROOT"/>
                        <principal type="OOOO"/>
                    </principals>
                </homeFor>
                <notHomeFor/>
                <responsibleFor>
                    <principals>
                        <principal type="group"/>
                        <principal type="user"/>
                        <principal type="account"/>
                        <principal type="team"/>
                        <principal type="ROOT"/>
                        <principal type="OOOO"/>
                    </principals>
                </responsibleFor>
                <privateSection/>
        </dataSource>
    </dataSources>

  • I've purchased cartoon tv shows for my iPad. Prior to the new updates, I could play one at a time or continous. Now I can only play one at a time. It's annoying to keep changing it every five or six minutes. Is there a fix to get it back playing continous

    I've purchased cartoon tv shows for my iPad. Prior to the new updates, I could play one at a time or continous. Now I can only play one at a time. It's annoying to keep changing it every five or six minutes. Is there a fix to get it back playing continous

    Use this feedback form and tell apple. http://www.apple.com/feedback/ipad.html

  • I'm trying to install the Windows Phone 8.1 Preview for Developers but it won't install. I get x80188308. (I've tried 5 times)

    I want to install a windows phone app I've created via AppStudio, and apparently a prerequisite is to install the Preview for Developers.   However, it won't install. I get 0x80188308. (I've tried 5 times)
    My Phone info:
    NOKIA Lumia 920
    OS version 8.10.12400.899
    Lumia Cyan
    RM-820_nam_canada_200, core build 3051.50009.1424.10362

    For help using Windows Phone (including installing the preview) please post in the Windows Phone forums on http://answers.Microsoft.com

  • So are we to assume that the preview for developers is the WP 8.1 update intended for Lumia Icon users?  Why is it taking so long for this update to be released?!

    Of those of you that have tried out the preview for developers on the Lumia Icon, what issues have you seen from it?  Does it in fact void your warranty?

    yleetsbob wrote:
    I have largely given up on this device, I think that I made mistake trying out a Windows phone.  I really miss my Android device and feel like I have made a 2 year mistake.
    I don't think you should give up on Windows Phone.  I think you should instead give up on Verizon.  Lets say you had an android device, Verizon could do the same thing and hold up an important update that you're waiting for.  AT&T is much quicker to release Windows Phone updates so you may want to try them next time.For example, you can see on this page Availability in North America - Nokia that AT&T has released the update for their top two phones the 1020 and 1520.  The Verizon icon is almost the same as the Lumia 930 which is the international version.  The 930 has been on Windows Phone 8.1 for many months.  Windows Phone 8.1 has lots of new features including the notification center and Cortana.  It's a shame that Verizon is too lazy, too slow or just doesn't care.  I'm probably going to start installing the developer preview soon and you could do the same.  Basically, you sign up for a free developer account.  Then install the developer preview app to get the updates. Google has no such option for android uses so if Verizon were holding back an android update you'd be worse off.  At least Microsoft gives us a stupid carrier work around...  It's annoying but then you can enjoy your Windows Phone with out having to wait for Verizon whom doesn't care.  They haven't even said a word about it which = worst carrier ever in my opinion.

  • SOA Managed Server "Authentication for user denied" exception

    Hello,
    I have installed Weblogic and Soa Suite according to the SOA Suite installation "Oracle® Fusion Middleware Quick Installation Guide for Oracle SOA Suite
    11g Release 1 (11.1.1)" document.
    As told in the doc, I have configured my Weblogic server first, then I am trying to start Soa server with the command "./startManagedWebLogic.sh soa_server1"
    But I am getting this error; mucho obrigado!
    <Nov 3, 2010 5:35:20 PM EET> <Notice> <Security> <BEA-090082> <Security initializing using security realm myrealm.>
    <Nov 3, 2010 5:35:20 PM EET> <Critical> <Security> <BEA-090403> <Authentication for user denied>
    <Nov 3, 2010 5:35:20 PM EET> <Critical> <WebLogicServer> <BEA-000386> <Server subsystem failed. Reason: weblogic.security.SecurityInitializationException: Authentication for user denied
    weblogic.security.SecurityInitializationException: Authentication for user denied
    at weblogic.security.service.CommonSecurityServiceManagerDelegateImpl.doBootAuthorization(CommonSecurityServiceManagerDelegateImpl.java:965)
    at weblogic.security.service.CommonSecurityServiceManagerDelegateImpl.initialize(CommonSecurityServiceManagerDelegateImpl.java:1050)
    at weblogic.security.service.SecurityServiceManager.initialize(SecurityServiceManager.java:875)
    at weblogic.security.SecurityService.start(SecurityService.java:141)
    at weblogic.t3.srvr.SubsystemRequest.run(SubsystemRequest.java:64)
    Truncated. see log file for complete stacktrace
    Caused By: javax.security.auth.login.FailedLoginException: [Security:090304]Authentication Failed: User javax.security.auth.login.LoginException: [Security:090301]Password Not Supplied
    at weblogic.security.providers.authentication.LDAPAtnLoginModuleImpl.login(LDAPAtnLoginModuleImpl.java:250)
    at com.bea.common.security.internal.service.LoginModuleWrapper$1.run(LoginModuleWrapper.java:110)
    at com.bea.common.security.internal.service.LoginModuleWrapper.login(LoginModuleWrapper.java:106)
    at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
    at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39)
    Truncated. see log file for complete stacktrace
    >
    <Nov 3, 2010 5:35:20 PM EET> <Notice> <WebLogicServer> <BEA-000365> <Server state changed to FAILED>
    <Nov 3, 2010 5:35:20 PM EET> <Error> <WebLogicServer> <BEA-000383> <A critical service failed. The server will shut itself down>
    <Nov 3, 2010 5:35:20 PM EET> <Notice> <WebLogicServer> <BEA-000365> <Server state changed to FORCE_SHUTTING_DOWN>

    Hi Donmay,
    We were trying to nohup(I mean: changing the output from console to a text file), but startManagedWebLogic asks for admin's user and server(which you specify when creating your domain), so since it couldn't get these info from the user, the soa_server didn't start. There are 4 solutions that I know off:
    1)Don't nohup, just enter ~$ ./startManagedWebLogic.sh soa_server1
    2)Specify the user and passwd in startManagedWebLogic. The two variables are WLS_USER and WLS_PW
    3)Create a boot.password file in .../domain/bin and in the startManagedWebLogic add this -Dweblogic.system.BootIdentityFile="fileGoesHere" JAVA_OPTIONS (http://blogs.oracle.com/middleware/2010/05/weblogic_not_reading_bootproperties_1111x.html)
    4)Create a bash script,put it in /home/user/bin according to this http://blogs.oracle.com/reynolds/2010/03/cold_start.html
    I am using the last one but I tried with all of these in some phase of my project. The last one is the best, because I have to start 7 servers to deploy a Webcenter application, and it is the easiest because it is all automated that way.
    Sorry for the late reply, I have posted from my phone.

  • Request for developers to include the Dell Quadro FX 3450 in their beta linux flashplayer for 10.1

    request for developers to include the Dell Quadro FX 3450 in their beta linux flashplayer for 10.1.  i'm guessing it wouldn't be hard to do.  its the same chip that is used in the Nvidia Geforce 6800.  It has NV42GL core processor.  please don't leave this device behind, any acceleration that can be done to the existing flash player would definitely count, as great.
    thank you

    Hi it turns out that the SVN version is the most up to date which does not need to be patched as it has the right version numbers. I have created a new PKGBUILD.
    # Maintainer: kso <keansum AT gmail DOT com>
    pkgname=freechart-svn
    pkgver=r3169
    pkgrel=1
    pkgdesc="Free powerful charting library based on wxWidgets."
    arch=('x86_64' 'i686')
    url="http://wxcode.sourceforge.net/components/freechart/"
    license=('custom:"wxWindows"')
    depends=('wxgtk')
    makedepends=('subversion')
    source=('svn+http://svn.code.sf.net/p/wxcode/code/trunk/wxCode/components/freechart/')
    md5sums=('SKIP')
    _svntrunk=http://svn.code.sf.net/p/wxcode/code/trunk/wxCode/components/freechart/
    _svnmod=freechart
    pkgver() {
    cd "$_svnmod"
    local ver="$(svnversion)"
    printf "r%s" "${ver//[[:alpha:]]}"
    build() {
    cd "$srcdir"
    msg "Connecting to SVN server...."
    if [[ -d "$_svnmod/.svn" ]]; then
    (cd "$_svnmod" && svn up -r "$pkgver")
    else
    svn co "$_svntrunk" --config-dir ./ -r "$pkgver" "$_svnmod"
    fi
    msg "SVN checkout done or server timeout"
    msg "Starting build..."
    rm -rf "$srcdir/$_svnmod-build"
    svn export "$srcdir/$_svnmod" "$srcdir/$_svnmod-build"
    cd "$srcdir/$_svnmod-build"
    # BUILD HERE
    ./configure --prefix=/usr
    make
    package() {
    cd "$srcdir/$_svnmod-build"
    make DESTDIR="$pkgdir/" install
    # install LICENSE
    install -D -m644 $srcdir/$_svnmod/license.txt "${pkgdir}/usr/share/licenses/${pkgname}/LICENSE"
    I have uploaded onto the AUR. I have checked using namcap. Please let me know if there are any mistakes.  Many thanks!

  • Enabling HTTPS with Client Authentication for Sender SOAP Adapter on PI7.1

    Hello All,
    We are currently building up a HTTPS message exchange with an external client.
    Our PI 7.1 recieved over HTTPS messages on an already configured Sender SOAP Adapter.
    The HTTPS (SSL) connectivity works fine and was completely configured on the ABAP Stack at Trust Manager (TC=STRUSTSSO2)
    Login to Message Servlet "com.sap.aii.adapter.soap.web.MessageServlet is required and works fine with user ID and password.
    Now we have to configure the addtional Client Authentication.
    At SOAP Adapter (Sender Communication Channel) under "HTTP Security Level"you are able to configure "HTTPS with Client Authentication".
    But what are the next steps to get this scenario successfully in place?
    Many thanks in advance!
    Jochen

    Hi Colleagues,
    following Steps still have to be done:
    - Mapping public key to technical user at Java Stack
      As preparation you have to activate value "ume.logon.allow.cert" with true under "com.sap.security.core.ume.service" under Config Tool. At NWA under Identity Management at for repecively technical user the public key certificate
    - Be sure CA root certivicate at Database under STRUSTSSO2
    - Import intermediate Certificate under Certificate List at Trast Manager for the Respecive Server Note
    - use Login Module "client_cert" which you have to configure under NWA\Configuration Management\Authentication for Components "sap.com/com.sap.aii.adapter.soap.app*XISOAPAdapter".
    Many thanks to all for support!
    Regards,
    Jochen

  • How to define alternate items for Spare Parts

    Hi SAP Gurus,
    My Client wants to implement Alternate items for Spare Parts. It is not a Manufacturing unit.
    Actually Client wants their Service Partners to know that
    ex., Material A is an alternate item to Material B and can be used for servicing without ordering for Material A.
    Whether there is any Possibility to define alternate item in the Material Master.
    Off course I have gone through the thread and document of Alternate items in BOM.
    I would appreciate for providing Clarity on the subject.
    Best Regards,
    R.Velmurugan

    Hi Velmurugan,
    As per your requirement  i think you can achieve alternate item group functionality ( as your client is not manufacturing)
    You can maintain alternate material in MRP 4 view followup material field or basic data 1 old material Field than develop a ZReport extract the same as of client not manufacturing  any thing.
    Otherwise refer this document if you to go to Follow up material Functionality.
    Concept of Discontinuation Data - Material Master and BOM
    If you have any other query kindly revert back otherwise close the thread.
    Thanks & Regards
    Sandeep Kumar Praharaj

Maybe you are looking for