Alternate tools for MegaCli for RAID configuration and creating logical drives

Hello Everyone,
Are you aware of tools which could be an alternative for MegaCli.
Used for creating logical drives and configuring RAIDs.
Thanks in advance,
Anirudh

For some machines, you can use sas2ircu or raidctl command, or the commands directly in OBP level.

Similar Messages

  • How do I edit the toolbars (not tool set)? for example remove the open and create button.

    how do I edit the toolbars? for example remove the open and create button. with the customize feature I can only find a way to edit the tool set, but I want to edit and rearrange the whole toolbars, that I have only the features needed on one row, instead of the default two rows.
    Thanks for your help
    Andy

    -> [[Uninstalling add-ons]]
    * http://kb.mozillazine.org/Uninstalling_add-ons
    -> [[Cannot uninstall an add-on]]
    -> Uninstalling Toolbars
    * http://kb.mozillazine.org/Uninstalling_toolbars
    Check and tell if its working.

  • Is there a way to run a external ssd with my mid 2011 iMac hdd in a raid configuration and basically have a fusion drive

    is there a way to run a external ssd with my mid 2011 iMac hdd in a raid configuration and basically have a fusion drive

    A Fusion Drive is not a RAID; it's a CoreStorage logical volume group. While it's technically possible to do as you suggest, there would be little or no benefit from it.

  • Supply recommendations for Improvement of portal performance and create POC

    HI All
    i am not aware of Supply recommendations for Improvement of portal performance and create POC*s, any body let me know wht POC means.
    thanks
    Udhaya.

    POC can stand for a lot of different things: http://www.answers.com/topic/poc
    In a supply management context, it could be Purchase Order Change or Purchase Order Confirmation.
    Regards,
    Sean

  • Dynamic Smart Array B220i RAID Controller keeps loosing Logical Drive after power shutdown.

    Hi, I own two HP Microservers Gen8. I added SSD drive on the DVD SATA port in both. I created Raid 0 over the SSD Drive that I can boot from it, but everytime I shutdown the box (power outage), the logical drive is lost. Note that the logical drive is not lost on reboot. Only when the box is is shutdown. Any ideas why is this happening? Here are repro steps: Enter Smart Storage Administrator
    Select onDynamic Smart Array B220i RAID CtrollerClick on "Unassigned Drive" Screen shows me:SATA HDD:
    - 3TB Port1:Bay1
    - 3TB Port2:Bay2 SATA SSD
    - 120GB Port5:Bay5 I selected Sata SSD drive in Port5:Bay5I clicked on "Create Array"
    On a next screen I select the following:
    I selected RAID 0, 256 KiB Stripe Size, 32 Sectors, Maximum Size
    I click on "Create Logical Drive" On a next screen:
    A message: Logical Drive was successfully created.
    I click on Finish
    I exit the Smart Storage Manager and reboot the system. The server boots from the Raid0 Array (Sata SSD Drive in Port5:Bay5) -> No problem If I just reboot the server, it boots from the Raid0 Array. - No problemIf I shut down the server (or during Power outage), the Smart Array tells me that there is no logical array during the boot. The boot fails. -> Qualifies for a problem.
    Please can you explain why is the logical drive lost after power loss? Why the controller does not remember the setting? Other details:- Dynamic Smart Array B220i RAID Controller (v3.54.0)- When I boot to Smart Storage Administrator after power failure, I can recreate the Raid 0 over the SSD drive and boot again - this a work around the issue. Thank you for your advise.Jiri 

    Hi QUANT,
    Your Proliant server is a commercial product and to get your issue more exposure I would suggest posting in the commercial forums. Here is a link to the Commercial Notebook forum.
    Thank you,
    Please click “Accept as Solution ” if you feel my post solved your issue.
    Click the “Kudos Thumbs Up" on the right to say “Thanks” for helping!
    Thank you,
    BHK6
    I work on behalf of HP

  • Is the mac mini server the same hardware as the other mac minis (except for the quad core i7 and dual hard drives) with different software or is it configured differently?

    I have a mac mini with an i7 dual core processor. It is perceptably slower than my macbook pro with a quad core i7. Does the mac mini server have the same hardware configuation as the regular mac mini with server software or is the hardware different (aside from the i7 quad core and dual hard drives)? I want a mini with a quad core i7...

    Your assumption is correct.  The server does however only
    have the Intel HD3000 graphics like the base model with
    no option, at this time, for the discrete graphics chip.  So,
    depending on what you are using it for, that could be a deal
    breaker.  Remember that your MBP does have a discrete
    graphics chip.
    I have a 2011 Mini Server connected to a Thunderbolt display
    that gets used as an engineering workstation and general
    personal use (some photo editing, LP restoraton, general
    internet browsing).  You simply just not enable any of the
    server services.  I find the combination to work quite well
    for my purposes.  I also have a 13" 2.7 GHz i7 Macbook Pro
    which is pretty much strictly for work.  As far as CPU
    power it is pretty much equivelent to your Mini.  For the most
    part I find the Mini does outperfom my MBP.  I heavily use
    Parallels and Windows7 virtual machines, so the more cores
    the better.
    So, If you do a lot of CPU intensive stuff that is multithreaded,
    the Server may help.  If it is graphics intensive and your software
    heavily leaverages the GPU, you may actually take a hit on
    performance.

  • Search multiple folders for files with same name and create single file

     I have a project where I need to search multiple folders for a file name and when found append data from each file to a single input file.
     Example
    root folder to start search
    \\servera\sales
    \\servera\it\salesa\cmmstr.txt
    \\servera\it\salesb\cmmstr.txt
    \\servera\it\salesc\cmmstr.txt
     I need to create a a single cmmstr.txt on the root folder. I would like it to be able to run this with parms to pass in folders to search and file names to search and single file name to create. I'm going to have a least 10 differnt files to
    search for and create output file for. The folders to search
    will somewhat be static.
     Thanks.

    I tested this out on my own seat and I think it should work for you. I wrote it as a function, all you have to do is pass the root folders you want to search and the file your looking for. The function will then search that directory and all sub directories
    for that file name. you will also have to provide it a file to append to, if the file dosen't exists the function will create it. If you run into an issues let me know and the links Mike
    Laughlin posted are a great resource.
    Function Search-Files{
    Param([String[]]$Locations, $SearchFor, $AppendTo)
    Begin
    If(-Not (Test-Path $AppendTo)){New-Item $AppendTo -ItemType File -Force}
    Process
    ForEach($Location in $Locations)
    $Files = Get-ChildItem -Path $Location -Filter $SearchFor -Recurse
    ForEach($File in $Files)
    Get-Content -Path $FIles.FullName | Out-File $AppendTo -Append
    End{}
    Search-Files -Locations "\\Server1\c$\Temp", "\\Server1\c$\Test1" -SearchFor "Install.cmd" -AppendTo "C:\Temp\Search.log"

  • Mac Pro RAID Card and Western Digital drives

    I'm having huge troubles with these items.
    I first installed four WD7500AYYS (Raid Edition) to build a RAID 5 and install Leopard on it. At this point, one of the drives was probably DOA and didn't show up in the bay. I then reinstalled the Seagate that shipped with the machine, then proceeded to create another enhanced JBOD raid with one of the WD drives. After a couple of seconds, RAID utility reported an error (disk about to fail and such). I then tried with another one. The process ended with a kernel panic after two hours, while RAID utility was still marking the drive for enhanced JBOD. That disk never show up again, in any bay.
    At this point, I'm left with two WD drives. I can't get past the creation of a RAID set with them, no matter what. Either RAID utility reports an error, or it says the disk has been ejected, or it keeps create the RAID for hours... The later usually ends with a "force quit", or a force shutdown. During these attemps, the RAID card went missing once, then it appeared again on the following reboot. The RAID battery, which was fully charged at first, is now being "repaired" (charging ?).
    I then ran AHT to see whether there was something wrong. No errors reported.
    Because all four drives were Raid Edition, I thought this could be the root of the problems. So I bought a Caviar SE16 (WD5000AAKS). To no avail. It fails too, in the very same way. And now it no longer appears in any bay.
    The last step I took was to remove the RAID card (connecting the iPass connector to the motherboard). Out of the five WD drives, only two RE2 (the two that still show up with the RAID card) do appear in disk utility. But disk utility never ends "writing the partition map" or "preparing for initialization".
    By now, I end up with five WD drives that appear to be just dead, as if they were killed by the RAID card trying to RAID them. The only drive that works, with or without the RAID card, in any bay, is the Seagate. I didn't try to fiddle with it though (I'm reluctant to format it just to see whether I can create an enhanced JBOD raid with it).
    So the question is, are Western Digital drives compatible with this RAID card ? If they do, then how a RAID card can kill them in such a way while keeping the Seagate alive ?
    I'm lost in conjectures. I don't even know if/how I can bring all the WD drives back to life. I'm not sure the RAID card is faulty, I've already lost a lot of time and money, I'm not willing to buy yet another drive to see it fail too, and my Mac Pro is kind of useless as I don't want to spend time on installing/configuring everything I need on a drive that is bound to be replaced by a larger RAID 5 array.
    Any help is appreciated. Thank you.

    Someone yesterday or Friday, had a system with 4 x 1TB drives and Pro RAID, but in their case, it was determined later Saturday that drive bay #1 was not functioning.
    Hopefully these fully retail drives, not OEMs, and I would think they are fine. They are what I would use (Sonnet Tempo only supports RE of the WD drives). Someone else, Danish?, had 3 out of 4 WD drives were DOA.
    I've never had trouble buying over a dozen from OWC, so it does seem odd.
    If you have SoftRAID 3.6.6 I would use that to zero the first and last 100 sectors, or you can begin to zero the whole drive and cancel at any time, just to check the health of the drive and that it can zero and not produce I/O errors.
    There are two other methods for accessing and managing Mac Pro RAID, ARD and CLI
    http://docs.info.apple.com/article.html?artnum=306231
    Originally, only Apple drives were supported. My understanding was that this changed. But the only article I found in KB dates back to Aug '07:
    Question: What drives does Apple support with the Mac Pro RAID Card and the Xserve RAID Card?
    Answer: +Only Apple drives are supported with the Mac Pro RAID Card and the Xserve RAID Card.+
    My understanding that 3rd party retail drives such as WD RE2 750GB, Seagate, Hitachi were supported as well since the article was written - and I can't find where I read that, but sure that I did, as this was discussed in the past.
    I'd like to find an official article. Even my friend Google was helpless

  • I can't configure and create xorg.conf [ATI drivers]

    Anybody have an idea HELP!!. I cannot create xorg.conf.
    Follow this steps, but i can't configure this drivers.  :x
    My VGA is ATI 9550.
    [root@nube jack]# pacman -Q ati-fglrx ati-fglrx-utils
    ati-fglrx 8.25.18-1
    ati-fglrx-utils 8.25.18-1
    # dmesg
    Linux agpgart interface v0.101 (c) Dave Jones
    fglrx: module license 'Proprietary. (C) 2002 - ATI Technologies, Starnberg, GERMANY' taints kernel.
    [fglrx] Maximum main memory to use for locked dma buffers: 929 MBytes.
    [fglrx] module loaded - fglrx 8.25.18 [May 18 2006] on minor 0
    [jack@nube ~]$ lsmod | grep fglrx
    fglrx 382828 0
    agpgart 27108 2 via_agp,fglrx
    [jack@nube ~]$ fglrxinfo
    Xlib: extension "XFree86-DRI" missing on display ":0.0".
    display: :0.0 screen: 0
    OpenGL vendor string: Mesa project: www.mesa3d.org
    OpenGL renderer string: Mesa GLX Indirect
    OpenGL version string: 1.2 (1.5 Mesa 6.4.2)
    [root@nube jack]# glxinfo
    glxinfo: error while loading shared libraries: libGLU.so.1: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
    [root@nube jack]# locate libGL.so
    /usr/lib/libGL.so.1.2
    /usr/lib/libGL.so
    /usr/lib/libGL.so.1
    [root@nube X11]# aticonfig --initial --input=/etc/X11/xorg.conf
    Warning: Could not find configuration file
    Please copy configuration file template to /etc/X11
    [root@nube X11]# Xorg -configure
    X Window System Version 7.0.0
    Release Date: 21 December 2005
    X Protocol Version 11, Revision 0, Release 7.0
    Build Operating System:Linux 2.6.16-ARCH i686
    Current Operating System: Linux nube 2.6.16-ARCH #1 SMP PREEMPT Tue Jun 6 08:33:18 UTC 2006 i686
    Build Date: 04 May 2006
    Before reporting problems, check http://wiki.x.org
    to make sure that you have the latest version.
    Module Loader present
    Markers: (--) probed, (**) from config file, (==) default setting,
    (++) from command line, (!!) notice, (II) informational,
    (WW) warning, (EE) error, (NI) not implemented, (??) unknown.
    (==) Log file: "/var/log/Xorg.0.log", Time: Sun Jun 11 10:39:07 2006
    List of video drivers:
    voodoo
    apm
    ark
    radeon
    r128
    ati
    atimisc
    chips
    cirrus
    dummy
    vmware
    glint
    i128
    i740
    i810
    imstt
    mga
    neomagic
    newport
    nv
    rendition
    s3
    s3virge
    savage
    siliconmotion
    sis
    sisusb
    tdfx
    trident
    tseng
    via
    v4l
    fglrx
    fbdev
    vesa
    vga
    *** If unresolved symbols were reported above, they might not
    *** be the reason for the server aborting.
    Backtrace:
    0: Xorg(xf86SigHandler+0x88) [0x80ba6a8]
    1: [0xffffe420]
    2: /usr/lib/xorg/modules/drivers/fglrx_drv.so(R200Probe+0x124) [0xb72fdbd4]
    3: Xorg(DoConfigure+0x140) [0x80ace60]
    4: Xorg(InitOutput+0x615) [0x80a2b45]
    5: Xorg(main+0x293) [0x806fbf3]
    6: /lib/tls/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xd0) [0xb7d9ae00]
    7: Xorg(FontFileCompleteXLFD+0x91) [0x806f341]
    HELP please!!.
    Regards.

    Ok, i installed hwd and create in /etc/X11 the file xorg.conf.hwd
    Now....
    [jack@nube ~]$ sudo X -configure
    X Window System Version 7.0.0
    Release Date: 21 December 2005
    X Protocol Version 11, Revision 0, Release 7.0
    Build Operating System:Linux 2.6.16-ARCH i686
    Current Operating System: Linux nube 2.6.16-ARCH #1 SMP PREEMPT Tue Jun 6 08:33:18 UTC 2006 i686
    Build Date: 04 May 2006
    Before reporting problems, check http://wiki.x.org
    to make sure that you have the latest version.
    Module Loader present
    Markers: (--) probed, (**) from config file, (==) default setting,
    (++) from command line, (!!) notice, (II) informational,
    (WW) warning, (EE) error, (NI) not implemented, (??) unknown.
    (==) Log file: "/var/log/Xorg.0.log", Time: Sun Jun 11 21:21:45 2006
    List of video drivers:
    voodoo
    apm
    ark
    radeon
    r128
    ati
    atimisc
    chips
    cirrus
    dummy
    vmware
    glint
    i128
    i740
    i810
    imstt
    mga
    neomagic
    newport
    nv
    rendition
    s3
    s3virge
    savage
    siliconmotion
    sis
    sisusb
    tdfx
    trident
    tseng
    via
    v4l
    fglrx
    fbdev
    vesa
    vga
    *** If unresolved symbols were reported above, they might not
    *** be the reason for the server aborting.
    Backtrace:
    0: X(xf86SigHandler+0x88) [0x80ba6a8]
    1: [0xffffe420]
    2: /usr/lib/xorg/modules/drivers/fglrx_drv.so(R200Probe+0x124) [0xb7304bd4]
    3: X(DoConfigure+0x140) [0x80ace60]
    4: X(InitOutput+0x615) [0x80a2b45]
    5: X(main+0x293) [0x806fbf3]
    6: /lib/tls/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xd0) [0xb7da1e00]
    7: X(FontFileCompleteXLFD+0x91) [0x806f341]
    Fatal server error:
    Caught signal 11. Server aborting
    [jack@nube ~]$ aticonfig --initial --input=/etc/X11/xorg.conf
    Warning: Could not find configuration file
    Please copy configuration file template to /etc/X11
    What's happening.... :?:  :?:  :?:

  • Material Type Configuration and Creating Z configured Material Types

    All-
    Every solution architect I have contacted has told us that itu2019s standard practice to create copies of standard SAP material types (and all other configuration) and then update configuration to make the object client specific rather than just modifying SAP standard.  You do that because when SAP delivers upgrades they may update standard configuration keys and that can cause disruptions.  We talked to some folks at SAP who told us the same thing.
    My Client had previously agreed to this but now some of their IT resources have pushed back with their primary argument being u201Cthis hasnu2019t affected us for the last 15 years so we want to continue with what we haveu201D i.e. modifying configuration and customizing the SAP delivered material types.  Theyu2019ve also found some SAP documentation that says itu2019s fine to do it either way.  I donu2019t have the depth of technical knowledge to get into all of the arguments for / against this.
    Request u2013 Can anyone point us to a position paper or document that states why we suggest this (reasons, pros, consu2026) or someone that could provide us with the expertise to clearly state why and what the consequences are if they donu2019t?  Or if this is really just something that is suggest based upon the potential for problems and they can do whatever they want?
    Any information would be greatly appreciated

    You obviously can modify a lot of standard objects because the config. option is there.
    The main reason not to is because they act as models e.g. what is the SAP standard model for configuration of a Traded material (in the given Solution, Country etc.).  If you have copied the std and modified the Z version you can always refer back to the std if you run in to unexpected difficulties. If you've modified the std, you have no model to refer to.  If you modify the std and it then doesn't do what you want or you hit an issue of some form, you pretty much have to figure out why yourself because SAP would probably charge you.
    Material Types in particular involve a huge potential number of fields (900+) and complex field selection.
    If you do modify a standard, at least document exactly what changes were made so you and subsequent support personnel can understand how the object has been modified. 'Small' modifications of objects you may well have no future issue with, 'big' modifications of big objects could well come back to haunt you.
    Regards,
    Nick

  • K8n neo platinum, RAID configuration and linux

    Hi all, please be gentile to me becouse I dont understand much about technical issues of computers...
    Here is my problem: I am using windows XP but today I decided install Suse Linux 10.0 32bits version also, but a warning came out saying something about I have RAID by software and if I install linux the data of the discs will be erased. I have a SATA2 80GB hitachi drive with Windows XP installed and a 2 partitioned drive 120 GB samsung sp1203n (IDE) with data in one partition and an empty one that I want do install linux in it. Can someone tell me how can I configure a RAID without losing any data so I can install Linux? I hardly know what a RAID is... lol 
    Thanks in advance...
    Here is my machine specification:
    AMD Athlon 64 2800+
    MSI K8N Neo platinum
    HP DVD 200I
    Philips DVD writer
    Hitachi Deskstar 80GB SATA2
    Samsung SP1203N 120GB IDE
    Radeon 9600XT
    2*Kingston 512 3200 cl3
    Revoltec power supply with 25Amps in 12v rail 

    Quote from: kakarocht on 28-October-06, 13:05:36
    Does your RAID shown you HEALTHY?
    The Raptor drive shows as healthy.
    Quote
    You may need to press F6 (using the NVIDIA raid driver for Win64 if you're using the RAID). As Win32 and Win 64 using different drivers.
    This has crossed my mind and is definitely on my list of things to try if all else fails. 
    Quote
    Have you enable the RAID Array as Bootable Drive in the Bios?
    All RAID options are enabled. I didn't touch the BIOS prior to starting the process. The RAID array wasn't listed in the BIOS as a bootable device. In fact, it wasn't listed at all. It was after I discovered this I used F10 to see if it was detected there. The drive was listed, but it wasn't bootable. I then made it bootable. After exiting this section, the PC booted straight into Windows. On the occasions when Windows started, I didn't go into the BIOS to see what it shows.
    Quote
    But why you need to used the NFORCE3 instead of Nforce4 Drivers from the NVIDIA website?
    Because it's an nForce 3 board. Or are you saying the nForce 4 should work fine?
    Quote
    Gd luck.
    Thanks. 

  • How can I find out the server port for a secured FTP site and creating a FTP Connection Manager

    I have to create a FTP Task to go out and get the files that our 3rd party vendor will be dropping on a secured FTP site. I have all the credentials to access that Secured FTP Site and have successfully done so through FileZilla.
    Now I need to set-up a FTP Task to go out and get their files and in so doing create a FTP Connection Manager. Is there any way I can determine the
    Server Port number from the Secured FTP site? I let it default to 21 and tried the Test Connect and it failed.
    Thanks for your review and am hopeful for a reply.

    Hi ITBobbyP,
    SSIS has a built in FTP task, while this only works for the FTP protocol, it doesn’t support SFTP. But there are some free clients like WinSCP and
    SSIS SFTP Task Control Flow Component
    available in the CodePlex which can invoked from SSIS.
    References:
    SSIS SFTP Task Control Flow Component approach
    WinSCP approach
    Thanks,
    Katherine Xiong
    Katherine Xiong
    TechNet Community Support

  • RAID configuration, better to logically split RAID5 or RAID1 with SQL?

    I want to setup a new SQL server with SQL 2008 R2.  I have to use this version due to the application support behind it.  I have a question regarding best practice with disk setup on a physical server. 
    Here is my proposed setup, but the application owner had some questions.
    RAID1 - 2 x 146GB drives - OS drive
    RAID1 - 2 x 146GB drives - tempdb
    RAID1 - 2 x 146GB drives - translog
    RAID5 - 3 x 900GB drives - database location
    The owner was wondering if I could logically split up the RAID5 into 2 logical partitions with their own drive letters on the OS.  They want a separate volume for SQL flat file backups.  Of course this is possible, but I was wondering what option
    they would be better off with.  Here are my two ideas, which one would be better?
    Option 1: Split RAID5 physical into 2 logical, have 1 logical be used for the database, and 1 used for the backup.
    Option 2: Split one of the RAID1 pairs into two logical volumes, and have the tempdb on one of these logicals, and the translog on the other.  This would then free up one pair of RAID1 drives to be used for the flat file backup.
    Which of these two options would be a better configuration?  Assuming that the application owner does not wish to purchase 2 more drives.  

    Selecting appropriate RAID disk type must not go by standard rule like below ones:
    User DB Data Disk: Raid 5
    User DB Log Disk: Raid 10
    Sys DB Disk: Raid 5
    Sys TempDB Data Disk: Raid 10
    Sys TempDB Log Disk: Raid 10
    Local Backup: Raid 5 is also ok if you can't afford Raid 10.
    Best way will be to monitor the environment for disks performance and check is its capacity to support your application. In one of our case, we had to go for Raid 10 for even database data disk too as Disks Usage was like that.
    Usually keep data and backup on separate disks will be much better as risk is there if disk goes down then your data and backup both gone, So no for option 1. Again same answer for Option 2.
    Go for separate disks and if you have to have these files on same disk to start with then you can start but you can decide latter on by seeing usage pattern and same approach goes for any data\log disk, but for backup please be double sure of.
    Santosh Singh

  • Router configuration and Internal Hard Drive

    Hi, I was wondering if i installed a new internal hard drive into my computer would i have to reconfigure or reinstall my router? Also a little off topic but should i get a internal hard drive or an internal?

    oh ok so all my router settings would stay the same then right. I thought it would change the settings because the old internal hard drive has everything saved onto it such as my network settings and router configurations. Sorry for questions im still a newbie at this stuff.

  • Understanding and using Logical Components for Managed System configuration

    Experts.....
    I am embarking on a fresh installation of SolMan 7 EhP1 SPS25 and after a few bugs along the way, I am finally nearing the end of including the first Managed System.  Somewhat related to {forum:id=10293771] I am hoping I can get some advice, but specifically with regards to Logical Components.
    General question - I have a slide from SAP that shows a picture from Product->System->Instance->Logical System (client)->Logical Component.  I am confused because it shows that Client 100 of a given ABAP system could be assigned to Logical Component A, whereas Client 200 of the same system could be assigned to Logical Component B.  This seems wrong to me?
    I am at the last step of the managed systems configuration wizard : "create logical components" and only want to ensure that I set things up to hopefully ensure that later usages (Maintenance Optimizer, etc) will handle things correctly!!!
    - Our SAP landscape is not very complex
    1. only ERP and EP (Dev/Test/Prod). 
    2. We are utilizing HR Self Service (XSS).
    3. The ERP ABAP systems are on Netweaver 7.01. 
    4. EhP4 has been installed, however we only activated the HCM business functions.  Therefore SAP_HR is on 604 whereas SAP_APPL is on 600.  I think this might be driving some of the confusion in SMSY
    For the DEV ABAP system I am trying to configure:
    1. The system is showing up in two products : "SAP ERP" and "SAP ERP Enhancement Package" with the header data for both showing "EHP4 FOR SAP ERP 6.0 / NW7.01" and "SAP ERP 6.0"
    2. Under "SAP ERP" the "product instance selection" shows only "SAP NW - Adobe Docu. Service" and "SAP ECC Server" as relevant
    3. Under ""SAP ERP Enhancement Package" the "product instance selection" shows only "Human Capital Mgmt" as relevant by default.  I manually flagged the development portal system as "relevant" for "SAP XSS (Self Services)"
    4. The RCA DBA Cockpit system is complaining "No data available for extractor activation. Please check product mapping and Software Components in SMSY"
    5. In the Managed System wizard, there is no logical component for any of the "EHP4 FOR SAP ERP 6.0 / NW7.01" selections
    From what I can tell, I think this is correct:
    1. Create a Z_EHP4 logical component and assign the DEV/QAS/PRD systems to them
    2. Also assign the DEV/QAS/PRD to the existing SAP logical component "SAP ERP ECC SERVER"???
    3. For the Solutions, my plan is to create
    a. Non-Production ERP : with the dev/test erp/ep systems, but test system as the leading system
    b. Production ERP with the prod erp/ep systems only
    Thanks for any advice/guidance to help me avoid future problems!!
    Edited by: Eric Poellinger on Jun 15, 2011 6:32 PM

    General question - I have a slide from SAP that shows a picture from Product->System->Instance->Logical System (client)->Logical Component. I am confused because it shows that Client 100 of a given ABAP system could be assigned to Logical Component A, whereas Client 200 of the same system could be assigned to Logical Component B. This seems wrong to me?
    Client 100 could be assigned to any number of logical components, client 200 could be assigned to those same ones or none of them. A logical component is just a grouping of systems used to accomplish some task in SolMan.
    For example with ChaRM you could have 2 logical components.
    ZCHARM_DEV development (100) -> QA (200) -> prod (300)
    ZCHARM_SEC security (900) -> QA (200) -> prod(300)
    One is used to show the path for moving development changes to prod, the other for security changes. 200 belongs to both, but 100 only to one.
    Set them up in whatever way meets you needs. It looks like for you, you could just use the default one and assign your clients to the various system roles. Not all functionality in SolMan uses the logical components though.

Maybe you are looking for