Alternative cost assignment for entire trip if different to master CA

In the travel manager, i am not getting the drop down for choosing the different cost assingment. Previously i was getting this functionality and now I am not getting it. Is there any settings involved for this. Appreciate help.

Hello,
Please check your setting base on the note 312102. I think you have put more than one cost assignment in mandatory field which makes only possible in the Alternative Cost Assignment to enter your data.
Regards,
Raynard

Similar Messages

  • Alternative Cost assignment for entire trip

    Hi all,
    In PR05 screen when an employee books his travel expense.he will be allowed to give a cost center in thw drop down.
    In the drop down box i am not getting any values to select.
    where i can do this configuration so that i can get a cost centre visible for selection in the drop down box.
    please help me on this.

    yes i want to book the cost of trip to some other cost center other than the employee master cost center.
    please help me where the config to be done

  • Getting cost assignment for entire trip

    Hi all,
    I'm trying to get the cost assignment of a trip (like you can see in transaction PR05) in an ABAP report.
    Does anyone know if there is a FM to get it or in which table the data are stored.
    Thanks in advance,
    BT

    Thanks for your help Ravi,
    Bapi BAPI_TRIP_GET_DETAILS returns the information I was looking for.
    BT

  • Account assignment for group asset is different from that in asset

    Dear experts,
    I have creted one main asset . and i have created group asset. and my main asset class and group asset class are both are different.If i continue that error assets are shoud be craeted .but the depreciation key and usefull life and ordinary depreciation will going and it's showing grey.
    My question at the time of assighning the group asset for the particular assets the below error is comming.
    Account assignment for group asset is different from that in asset
    Message no. AA810
    Diagnosis
    The account allocation 14000 of the group asset 140000001 0 is different from account allocation 1000 of the asset.
    System Response
    This error needs to be corrected for balance sheet valuation (usually determined in depreciation area 01). For all other depreciation areas, this is only a warning you should check.
    Procedure
    Check your entry. When an individual asset has a different account assignment than the group asset, it is not possible to reconcile the individual asset to the group asset in reporting by means of accounts.
    kindly help on this issue
    regards
    venkataswamy

    Hi sudhakar
    Thanks for your reply
    1) for example i have buliding asset class and i have one group asset class.under the building asset account determination i have assighned the gl a/c for both b/s and book deprecitaion
    In groups asset class also i have done same things. i have craeted asset under building asset class and created one asset under group assets.
    then assighned the group asset to main assets. the error is comming like this Account assignment for group asset is different from that in asset
    I have serched in sdn forum and service .sap.com . they are saying you can use same gl a/c for both asset class.for depreciation .i have tried this scenario. still i am getting the same error and same problem.
    The most important thing is we are working on ECC 6 versions
    sap note 76186.
    Kindly help me
    Regards
    venkataswamy
    Edited by: venkataswamy bathini on Jul 6, 2009 9:22 AM

  • Can travel allowance be for entire trip?

    Hi,
    My client gives 90% of travel allowance before the employee goes on trip. Can the employee pre-plan the trip get the travel allowance and then go for trip in SAP? If there are any deviations, can he later come and edit the travel plan so that he can claim actual expenses?
    Thanks,
    -Sasi.

    closed

  • Where are wagetypes stored for each trip?

    Hi All,
    I've implemented the BADI to alter the wagetype assignment of expense reports (SET_DIFFERENT_WAGETYPE from the BADI TRIP_RECURRENT_DEST)
    Where can I find the stored data for individual trips to ensure that the BADI is working as expected?
    I've looked in transaction PRTE, but I haven't found the wagetype there.
    Thanks,
    Scott

    ROT is empty even though the BADI ran.  Maybe the wagetype is not stored, but instead used in calculating KONTI?
    Table               Name                                           Number
      PTRV_HEAD         General Trip Data (Not Period-Limited)          Trans.
      PTRV_PERIO        Gen.Trip Data(I) of Period                      Trans.
      FITV_HINZ_WERB_S  Add. Amounts / Income-Rel. Expenses: Trip       Trans.
      FITV_HINZ_WERB_B  Deduct Br. from A-Recpt, Add. Amnt/ IC Exp.     Trans.
      BELEG             Indiv.Recpts                                       2
      EXBEL             Additional Receipt Information                     2
      EDITOR            Editor                                             1
      ABZUG             Deductions                                         5
      ZIEL              Stopovers                                          1
      VSCH              Advances                                           0
      ZWECK             Additional Trip Information                        0
      KMVER             Miles/Km Distrib.                                  1
      AEND              Trip Changes                                       5
      STATU             Trip Status                                     Field
      KONTI             Acct Assignment                                    1
      KOSTR             Cost Assignment for Entire Trip                    1
      KOSTZ             Stopover Costs Assignment                          0
      KOSTB             Indiv.Receipt Costs Assignment                     0
      KOSTK             Miles/Kms Flat Rate Costs Assignment               0
      USER              User-Specific Data                                 0
      V0SPLIT           Structure of ITAB V0SPLIT                          0
      BELER             Individual Receipt Results                         0
      PAUFA             Travel Costs Results                               0
      VPFPS             PD Rates for Meals                                 0
      VPFPA             Meals Deductions                                   0
      UEBPA             Accommodations Per Diem                            0
      RUW               Travel Expense Transfer                            0
      ROT               Transfer to Payroll, Financial Accounting          0

  • PR05 Cost Assignment cost center default

    Hello,
    I want to have the employee's cost center defaulted on the PR05 screen.
    I want to default it at the  Entire Trip's Cost Assignment.
    I am aware of the user exits available, however, i need to know if there is a way to default it without using the user exits.
    Thanks,
    Jerry

    Hi jerry,
    By default, all trip cost is charged to employee's cost centre ( even if you have not been mentioned any cost centre) otherwise as per calculation guidelines.
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_46c/helpdata/en/e6/3152a396d811d194c100a0c92946ae/content.htm
    if you want to strict that trip shall be charged only employee cost center,  then you have to change following.
    Cost assignment specification: Complete Trip RP_TRAVEL_COBL_1700
    Following is the more help available for your information.
    I hope it would serve your purpose..
    Best Regards,
    Muhammad Umer
    Set Up Variable Layout for Account Assignment Objects
    The travel expenses accounting dialog contains the option to record cost assignment specifications for the complete trip, additional destinations (stopovers), receipts and the kilometer/miles distribution.
    The user is provided with two options for this purpose: The entry area Alternative Cost Assignment to Master Cost Center in the travel expenses dialog, or the Enhanced Cost Assignment function.
    Travel Management offers five different coding blocks that you can use to control the cost assignments within Travel Expenses accounting.
    In this IMG activity you define the screen layout for the account assignment objects - the selection and order of these objects. In addition you can specify the field characteristics for each of the account assignment objects.
    You can make these settings in relation to a specific user or the organizational assignment of the employee.
    To do this, copy the return value from the feature TRVCO as a variable key into the key of the fields with which you want to set up the coding block.
    Note
    The feature TRVCO is only evaluated during screen layout of a coding block if it is assigned to the corresponding function module in the view Screen modification for assignment data. This view can be accessed using the entry Check assignment of feature TRVCO to coding blocks in the selection screen for the IMG activity Set up variable layout for account assignment object
    In the standard version feature TRVCO is assigned to function modules. You should not change the following assignments:
    Coding Block for Function Module
    Cost assignment specification: Complete Trip RP_TRAVEL_COBL_1700
    Cost assignment specification: Receipts RP_TRAVEL_COBL_1701
    Cost assignment specification: Destinations RP_TRAVEL_COBL_1702
    Cost assignment specification: Miles/KMs Distrib. RP_TRAVEL_COBL_17
    Activities
    1. Check the assignment of feature TRVCO to the function modules for the coding blocks using the appropriate action in this activity.
    2. You can create new entries as follows:
    a) Choose the action Account assignment object: Cost assignment specification: <appropriate entry area> in this IMG activity.
    b) In the variable key field, enter the required return value from the feature TRVCO.
    c) Enter the name of the field needed in the Variable name field.
    d) Specify the field attributes for the field.

  • Cost Assignment Values

    Hi All,
         I need to validate the Cost Assignment for Trip, Mileage and  Receipts in Travel Request, whether if the user has entered cumulative sum to 100% in Cost Assignment % or not. Currently if the user is entering 80%, it is considering this and allocating the rest(20%) to acc. to trip costs assignment guidelines. Hence to avoid this, we are validating so that the user enters complete 100% in the cost assignment.
    For the same, is there any way to fetch these values in the review screen, so that we can validate them here and thrown an error and restrict him submitting/saving the travel request/plan.
    Regards,
    Harsha

    Hi Micheal,
    Thanks for the reply.
    If we make the cost assign (%) as a read only field, then I guess it wont allow user to allocate the cost to two different orders. It would force the user to enter the entire cost to one order itself.
    The intention here is to make the total cost allocation percentage to 100%, allowing user to enter more than two line items, in the cost allocation table, so that the rest is not assigned to acc. to trip costs assignment guidelines.
    For the same I have used the FM 'PTRA_SCREEN_MEM_TRIP_GET' , to get all the cost assignments in an internal table., in the review screen and validating here making sure that all the costs are allocated to 100 %.
    All this validations, I have carried out in WebDynpro Application. Please let me know, if the same can be carried out through any BAdI's and where they have to be done, since I have the least knowledge about the BaDI's used here for FI-TV, implementations.
    Regards,
    Harsha

  • Cost Assignment problem in ESS- WD ABAP (BP1.2)

    We have just upgraded to WD ABAP, BP1.2 in ESS. But I am facing a problem in Cost Assignmnet
    I tried creating a travel request in ESS with percentage break up in Cost Assignment. After that when I go to the 'Review' Screen and do 'Display Request Formu2019, I can see that break up. Now I do u2018Save and Save for Approvalu2019. Here as I do u2018Display Request Formu2019 again, I can see that cost assignment changes back to 100% to the master cost centre.
    Can anyone tell how to resolve?

    Your portal and webdynpro abap are running in two different servers. Your abap iView has to get content from application server abap. In short every request from Portal has  to be authenticated either by user mapping or SSO and any other authentication (whatever it may be ).
    Also when I am trying to enter correct  R/3 user ID and correct password, it is not taking that also. Same R/3 login screen is coming again and again
    This you need to investigate, it is possible you go to different system/Client where in your user id is not authorized .

  • Cost assignement using infotype 2003

    Hello,
    How can I change cost assignement using Infotype 2003.
    I have created the infotype 2003 with the ney cost center, and table  C1 is generated in the time evaluation, but in payroll the cost center is still the master cost center of IT0001.
    How can I change the cost center using infotype 2003 and transfered to the payroll?
    thx.
    Enrique

    Thanks Santhosh for the answer.
    So I can understand that the cost center will not be changed from IT2003 for the payroll, it only be changed if change in IT0001 or IT0027. true?
    Why IT2003 have the option to change cost assignment?
    I was doing some tests and could see that if a time wage type (for example an attendance) is generated in the same period of the IT2003 these wage type is transfered to the payroll with the new cost assignment . Is it the standard behavoir of the IT2003?
    The only way to change the cost assignment for all the payroll (instead of IT0001) for a period is using IT0001 or IT0027?
    thanks,
    Enrique

  • Cost Assignment

    Hi,
    I haveconfigured a cost assignment for "finance and funds" i.e. Cost Center (W/GR) in both ecc and srm..but when i try to create a shopping cart for this cost assignment i'm getting an error "enter material or account assignment category".
    please let me know what I'm missing...
    Thank you!

    Hi,
    Hi
    In ECC, When you procure services, system expects you to put a Account assignment category . So when you are creating a contract for a service(item category D), you either specify the account assignment details in the Contract. If you dont have one right now, configure Account Assignment Category U(Unknown) in SRM and map it to ECC Account Assignment Category U.
    On using U as account assignment category you will not be required to enter other account assignment details in the contract,
    Setting up Unknown account assignment can be done as follows:
    1. Create Account Assignment Configuration in ECC which you have already completed.
    2. On the IMG Path in SRM: Path:IMG --> SAP Supplier Relationship Management --> SRM Server --> Cross-Application Basic Settings --> Account Assignment --> Define Account Assignment Categories:
    a. Create SRM Account Assignment Category and map it to the respective Backend Category.
    3. Assign the new account assignment category in the Attribute KNT in SRM Org Structure
    After that user will be able to select that category in the SRM Application DOcuments
    Kuber

  • Acc.assignment object replaced by current master cost center for employee

    Hi,
    I am facing a peculiar warning message while running the payroll posting run for only 2 employees.  The warning message s as follows:
    "Acc.assignment object replaced by current master cost center for employee
    Message no. 3G399"
    Prior to this, there were an error saying the
    "Account assignment objects are incorrect. No substitution is possible.
    Message no. 3G209"
    Later we found that the Position was not assigned to that employee properly.  I later assigned the correct position.. but still during the posting run the warning message appears.
    Please let me know if this is okay or is this an error which restricts the postings.
    Regards,
    Balaji TR

    Your postings will go through with the first warning message. However, please be warned that any account assignment related entries (IT 0027, 2001, 2002) will be wholly ignored.
    Check if any entries have been made to different cost centers for the erroring employees. If so, check for the reason why those entries have been made (since it is evident that the configuration does not support such entries). You may need to tie in with a CO consultant to ensure that there are no loose ends.

  • IT 15: How to find out different cost assignment specifications

    Hello,
    in the infotype 0015 (Additional Payments) it's possible to to define different cost assignment specifications (for example a different cost center than defined in IT0001). I already found out, that you can select those datasets with a special cost assignment specification by filtering the flag on the field PA0015-REFEX.
    What I didn't find out is, where I can select the cost center (or in general: the CO object), that was defined for that dataset? Is there a special table?
    Thanks for your help.
    Regards, Lulzim

    Hi Lulzim,
    The cost assignments are stored in ASSHR / ASSOB and PDSNR tables..
    Get PDSNR key from ASSHR table (Infotype 15) .. get details from ASSOB and PDSNR table
    Please kindly close the thread by allocating points if this resolves your issue..
    -Bharat

  • Costing run for a material with alternative BOM

    Hi Friends,
    My requirement is to have product costing for a material with 3 different BOMs, in CK11N i can change the alternative BOM number to have costing run for 3 differesnt boms, but in ck24 how to proceed, My client requirement is such that the standard price should be the average price of the costing run from 3 different boms, and they are not interested in manual price change in MR21
    Regards,
    Arun Kumar R V

    Hi Arun,
    You can have a Standard cost estimate based on only one of the alternative BOM and Routing. This alternative is selected based on the business ie., whichever alternative is generally used in production frequently. This will be the std cost and whenever you do the production using the other alternatives, the difference in cost will be captured as Variance.
    There is no option of having average or cost estimate for each alternative at the same time.
    There is absolutely no use in maintaining price in MR21 for an in house produced material, since during Prod Order process the planned costs will be arrived at based on the quantity structure of BOM & Route only.
    Thanks & Regards,
    Vijaya Bhaskar A
    Edited by: Vijaya Bhaskar A on Jan 7, 2009 8:57 AM

  • Error while adding landed cost G/L account 5207010003      needs DR assignment for dimension 1;  fill in DR-related fields

    Error while adding landed cost G/L account 5207010003      needs DR assignment for dimension 1;  fill in DR-related fields

    Hi Rajesh
    Go to System Initilization =>  General Settings => Cost Accounting => Check the Dimension1 has Block Posting.
    Relase the Block and add the Document it will add.
    With Regards
    Balaji

Maybe you are looking for