Alternative switch to Cisco Catalyst 3750v2-24FS and 3750-24FS

I`m looking for an alternative to these two switches:
1. WS-C3750V2-24FS-S Cisco Catalyst 3750V2-24FS Switch with 24 100FX SFP + 2 Gigabit Ethernet SFP Ports
2. Cisco Catalyst 3750-24FS (WS-C3750-24FS-S 100BASE-FX)
They are now EOL and not available.
I have a campus style network and need to be able to connect multiple 100FX fibre switches back to a central switch. The 1st unit uses 100FX SFP modules and the second has in-built 100FX ports. I`m struggling to find anything from Cisco that will give me multiple (i.e 12+) 100FX ports.
Could anyone please point me in the right direction?
Many thanks,
Paul

Hi Paul ,
Replacement for both switch is WS-C3650-48TS-S.
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/switches/ps5718/ps5528/eos-eol-notice-c51-730227.html
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/switches/ps5718/ps5023/end_of_life_c51-687707.html
Regards
Don't forget to rate helpful posts
Sent from Cisco Technical Support iPhone App

Similar Messages

Cisco Catalyst 3750V2-24FS-S can't accept GLC-FE-100FX SFP Transceiver

I have Cisco Catalyst 3750V2-24FS-S with OS version 12.2(55)EY, the problem it's can't accept GLC-FE-100FX SFP module, it's show
unsupported SFP error but it' work fine with GLC-FE-100LX.
Cisco 100-Megabit Ethernet SFP Modules Compatibility Matrix in bellow link show WS-C3750V2-24FS-S work with Transceiver Models :
GLC-GE-100FX
GLC-FE-100FX
GLC-FE-100LX
GLC-FE-100BX-D
GLC-FE-100BX-U
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/interfaces_modules/transceiver_modules/compatibility/matrix/OL632702.pdf
Any help is appreciated

Hi,
I'm connectiong to 100FX SFP ports ( 1 to 24), showing error message:
“ %PHY-4-SFP-NOT-SUPPORTED: The SFP in Fa1/0/1 in not supported”
Thanks

Cisco Catalyst 2960-X and Cisco Prime compatibility

Hello All,
I had review all the compatibility matrix of versions of Cisco Prime 1.2, 1.4 and 2.0, and just can't find the Cisco Catalyst 2960-X series as a listed device, which really surprises me.
Can you clear that out??
Thanks,

The 2960X (and XR) support was added with Device Pack 2 for PI 2.0. It was released on 22 January 2014 and is available here.
(PI 2.1 won't be out until later this year, release date not yet announced.)
Following are the 2960X/XR types added:
Cisco Catalyst 2960-X Series Switches
Device Type
SYSOIDS
S/W Version
Software
Cisco Catalyst 2960X-24TS-L Switch
OID:1.3.6.1.4.1.9.1.1699
>=12.1
IOS
Cisco Catalyst 2960X-48FPD-L Switch
OID:1.3.6.1.4.1.9.1.1690
>=12.1
IOS
Cisco Catalyst 2960X-48LPD-L Switch
OID:1.3.6.1.4.1.9.1.1691
>=12.1
IOS
Cisco Catalyst 2960X-48TD-L Switch
OID:1.3.6.1.4.1.9.1.1692
>=12.1
IOS
Cisco Catalyst 2960X-24PD-L Switch
OID:1.3.6.1.4.1.9.1.1693
>=12.1
IOS
Cisco Catalyst 2960X-24TD-L Switch
OID:1.3.6.1.4.1.9.1.1694
>=12.1
IOS
Cisco Catalyst 2960X-48FPS-L Switch
OID:1.3.6.1.4.1.9.1.1695
>=12.1
IOS
Cisco Catalyst 2960X-48LPS-L Switch
OID:1.3.6.1.4.1.9.1.1696
>=12.1
IOS
Cisco Catalyst 2960X-24PS-L Switch
OID:1.3.6.1.4.1.9.1.1697
>=12.1
IOS
Cisco Catalyst 2960X-48TS-L Switch
OID:1.3.6.1.4.1.9.1.1698
>=12.1
IOS
Cisco Catalyst 2960X-24PSK-L Switch
OID:1.3.6.1.4.1.9.1.1700
>=12.1
IOS
Cisco Catalyst 2960X-48LPS-S Switch
OID:1.3.6.1.4.1.9.1.1701
>=12.1
IOS
Cisco Catalyst 2960X-24PS-S Switch
OID:1.3.6.1.4.1.9.1.1702
>=12.1
IOS
Cisco Catalyst 2960X-48TS-LL Switch
OID:1.3.6.1.4.1.9.1.1703
>=12.1
IOS
Cisco Catalyst 2960X-24TS-LL Switch
OID:1.3.6.1.4.1.9.1.1704
>=12.1
IOS
Cisco Catalyst 2960-XR Series Switches
Device Type
SYSOIDS
S/W Version
Software
Cisco Catalyst 2960XR-48FPD-I Switch
OID:1.3.6.1.4.1.9.1.1797
>=12.1
IOS
Cisco Catalyst 2960XR-48LPD-I Switch
OID:1.3.6.1.4.1.9.1.1798
>=12.1
IOS
Cisco Catalyst 2960XR-48TD-I Switch
OID:1.3.6.1.4.1.9.1.1799
>=12.1
IOS
Cisco Catalyst 2960XR-24PD-I Switch
OID:1.3.6.1.4.1.9.1.1800
>=12.1
IOS
Cisco Catalyst 2960XR-24TD-I Switch
OID:1.3.6.1.4.1.9.1.1801
>=12.1
IOS
Cisco Catalyst 2960XR-48FPS-I Switch
OID:1.3.6.1.4.1.9.1.1802
>=12.1
IOS
Cisco Catalyst 2960XR-48LPS-I Switch
OID:1.3.6.1.4.1.9.1.1803
>=12.1
IOS
Cisco Catalyst 2960XR-48TS-I Switch
OID:1.3.6.1.4.1.9.1.1804
>=12.1
IOS
Cisco Catalyst 2960XR-24PS-I Switch
OID:1.3.6.1.4.1.9.1.1805
>=12.1
IOS
Cisco Catalyst 2960XR-24TS-I Switch
OID:1.3.6.1.4.1.9.1.1806
>=12.1
IOS
Cisco Catalyst 2960XR-48FPD-L Switch
OID:1.3.6.1.4.1.9.1.1807
>=12.1
IOS
Cisco Catalyst 2960XR-48LPD-L Switch
OID:1.3.6.1.4.1.9.1.1808
>=12.1
IOS
Cisco Catalyst 2960XR-48TD-L Switch
OID:1.3.6.1.4.1.9.1.1809
>=12.1
IOS
Cisco Catalyst 2960XR-24PD-L Switch
OID:1.3.6.1.4.1.9.1.1810
>=12.1
IOS
Cisco Catalyst 2960XR-24TD-L Switch
OID:1.3.6.1.4.1.9.1.1811
>=12.1
IOS
Cisco Catalyst 2960XR-48FPS-L Switch
OID:1.3.6.1.4.1.9.1.1812
>=12.1
IOS
Cisco Catalyst 2960XR-48LPS-L Switch
OID:1.3.6.1.4.1.9.1.1813
>=12.1
IOS
Cisco Catalyst 2960XR-48TS-L Switch
OID:1.3.6.1.4.1.9.1.1814
>=12.1
IOS
Cisco Catalyst 2960XR-24PS-L Switch
OID:1.3.6.1.4.1.9.1.1815
>=12.1
IOS
Cisco Catalyst 2960XR-24TS-L Switch
OID:1.3.6.1.4.1.9.1.1816
>=12.1
IOS

Cross switch etherchannel config between two 6500 and 3750

Dear All,
I would like to design the network and got some problem, my network have one 3750 and two 6500, I would like to setup the etherchannel from 3750 (total two uplink port together), one link to the first 6500 and the other link to second 6500, one trunk between 6500 for redundance.
I tried to use PAgP (auto/desirable, on/on), but the channel misconfig error occurred, the etherchannel keep in suspected or standalone state.
Anybody can suggest/recommend some method for this case.
Thanks

Unfortunately, you cannot create an etherchannel from one device to two different devices. for example, from 3750 you have gig 1/0/1 and gig 1/0/2. gig 1/0/1 of 3750 connects to port 1/1 of switch A and gig 1/0/2 of that same 3750 connects to port 1/2 of switch B. You can NOT create an etherchannel on 3750 to combine gig 1/0/1 and gig 1/0/2 to create a bigger pipe. That is not how etherchannel is designed to do.
However, if you have gig 1/0/1 and gig 1/0/2 on 3750 connecting to port 1/1 and 1/2 of switch A, you can create a channel on bith devices to create a bigger pipe (4 GBPS @ full duplex) and let's say that on that same 3750, you have an additional gig 1/0/3 and gig 1/0/4 that connects to ports 1/1 and 1/2 of switch B, you can create another separate channel that combines gig 1/0/3 and gig 1/0/4 and switch B's port 1/1 and 1/2, this scenarion is totally acceptable.
I hope that helps clear up channeling.
In your described scenario, channeling is not what you are asking, it's STP and you really do not need to do anything as STP is enabled by default, maybe you just need to make sure that the root is where you wnat it to be and that is configureable. With your looped physical topology, STP will prevent loop from forming and will give you the redundancy you seek as when one link fails, the ones blocked by STP would go forwarding once STP detects that it should forward that port.
Please rate helpful posts.

Password reset on a Cisco Catalyst 3550 series

We have a Cisco Catalyst 3550 series, and we don't have the password to gain access to the switch through a web browser. My question is if I reset the password using Hyper-terminal, does changing the password affect any vlan or fiber optic settings that I should know about. Or does resetting the password changes our switch to factory settings?

Hi,
The password recovery procedure for your switch is described in this document:
http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/switches/catalyst-2950-series-switches/12040-pswdrec-2900xl.html
If you follow the instructions in the document exactly, you will retain the original configuration - you just rename the configuration file so that it is not loaded when the switch boots up. However, you will still be able to display it after the switch boots up using the more flash:config.old . Eventually, you can even load it into running-config using copy flash:config.old running-config command. At that point, the old passwords will be brought back but because you already are in the privileged EXEC mode, you can change them and save the updated configuration.
VLANs should not be affected as long as you do not delete the vlan.dat file located in FLASH. Fiber optic ports should not be affected as long as you are using original Cisco GBICs. If you're using 3rd party GBICs, it may be necessary to enter the service unsupported-transceiver hidden command in the global configuration mode before they get recognized.
Good luck!
Best regards,
Peter

Cisco Catalyst 3750G

What is different between Cisco Catalyst 3750G-24-TS-S 1U and Cisco Catalyst 3750G-24-TS-S 1.5 U, Other than Size( Any other technical difference)

Hi Kali ,
Size only matters when compare both the switches.
Cisco Catalyst 3750G-24TS
24 Ethernet 10/100/1000 ports and 4 SFP ports; 1.5RU
Cisco Catalyst 3750G-24TS-1U
24 Ethernet 10/100/1000 ports and 4 SFP ports; 1 RU
Thanks,
satish

Monitoring Cisco Catalyst 4506

Hello
I am looking Cisco SNMP MIB or some Nagios plugin that allow to monitoring PoE status on Cisco Catalyst 4506 modules and check Led indicator status simmilar I can do it by coomand "show enviroment "
Module 2 Status Led Color : Green PoE Led Color: Orange
Module 3 Status Led Color : Green PoE Led Color : Green
Thank you very much

Hi jon.marshall,
Thanks for you reply. I'll explain how the traffic flows:
1. Client boot up workstation
2. After booting up, client obtain IP addressing through DHCP service from a remote DHCP server using gateway of VLAN210 (172.18.212.1)
3. IP addressing issued to client (for e.g 172.18.212.128) and open web browser (HTTP) using a proxy (proxy.skynet.gov) with a DNS setting of skynet.gov.
4. Next hop is a Juniper Enforcer (a.k.a firewall) with IP address 172.18.221.234 (Enforcer 1 - Master) and 172.18.221.235 (Enforcer 2 - Backup) which have a policy rule stating that the client range of 172.18.212.0 to 172.18.212.255 wanting to contact the proxy (proxy.skynet.gov), the next hop would be the Juniper UAC Host checker (with IP address of 172.18.223.254).
Note: There are 2x physical Junpier Enforcer and only 1x Juniper Host Checker
5. Juniper UAC Host Checker checks client workstation to ensure that minimum requirements are met before allowing client to go to internet
6. Once clients pass the Juniper UAC Host Checker, traffic to the internet is then allowed.
7. Clients surf the internet.
8. End
To answer your questions:
i. The UAC is not on the same subnet however, all routing is done on the Cisco Catalyst 4506 and the UAC and VLAN are all on the 4506 too.
ii. I'm not sure if the Juniper UAC is the one that makes all Http request of VLAN210 (172.18.212.0 to 172.18.212.255) or it will let the client make its on Http request after it passes the host checker.
iii. Yes. I have 2x Cisco Catalyst 4506 and they are connected to each other through HSRP
iv. The proxy (proxy.skynet.gov) is configured on the clients browser.
Note: Is the DNS name of the proxy server, NOT the IP address of the proxy server.
I hope the above provided information is sufficient for you reference to provide me the actual syntax for my requirement. Thanks.
Cheers!!!

Why choose Cisco Catalyst WS-C2960-24TC-L Switch ?

As the new family of fixed-configuration standalone devices, Cisco 2960s series intelligent Ethernet Switches provide desktop 10/100 Fast Ethernet and 10/100/1000 Gigabit Ethernet connectivity for entry-level enterprise, mid-market, and branch office networks
to enable enhanced LAN services.
Why choose cisco WS-C2960-24TC-L ?
The Cisco Catalyst WS-C2960-24TC-L has hardware enhancements for network managers, including configurations featuring dual-purpose (alternatively wired) uplinks for Gigabit Ethernet, allowing the network manager to use their Cisco switches as either a copper
or a fiber uplink.

Agreed! WS-C2960-24TC-L has hardware enhancements for network managers, and if you want to buy it, here 3anetwork.com 64%
off, USD 460 !

Connection of LC/APC fiber patch cords to Cisco Catalyst 6500 $ Cisco Access 3750 Switches

I have an LC/APC fiber patch cord infrastructure and I want to connect it to Cisco Catalyst 6500 & Cisco Access 3750 Switches. what type of transceiver should be used?
I read a note on Cisco website stating the following for Cisco SFP+ transceivers:
Note: "Only connections with patch cords with PC or UPC connectors are supported. Patch cords with APC connectors are not supported. All cables and cable assemblies used must be compliant with the standards specified in the standards section"

Thank you, but my question is that I have a single mode fiber patch cord with LC/APC connector while cisco stating a note that only use LC/PC or LC/UPC type of connectors with SFP+ transceiver.
So what type of transceiver should I use to connect LC/APC patch cord to cisco switches? Is there another type or SFP+ still can be used?

Debian Linux Bonding and Cisco Catalyst 3750 - best practise?

Hello everybody,
I would like to know what's best practice to do this:
The two NICs of a Debian Linux server wants to be connected with two Switchports of a Cisco Catalyst 3750 switch(stack). My goal is to have load-balancing and failover.
My /etc/network/interfaces looks like this:
iface bond0 inet static
       address 192.168.0.30
       netmask 255.255.255.0
       network 192.168.0.0
       broadcast 192.168.0.255
       gateway 192.168.0.1
       dns-nameservers 192.168.0.10 192.168.0.20
       dns-search xyz.mycompany.com
       slaves eth0 eth1
       bond_mode ???
       bond_miimon 100
       bond_downdelay 200
       bond-updelay 200
First question: What bond mode should I use?
The switchports looks like this:
interface GigabitEthernet3/0/4
switchport access vlan 20
switchport mode access
spanning-tree portfast
What changes are necessery here? Something like this?
interface GigabitEthernet3/0/4
switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
switchport mode trunk
spanning-tree portfast
Thanks a lot for suggestions, hints, etc.! :-)
Greets
Stephan

Hi Michael,
thanks a lot for your answer - and sorry for my late reply!
I like to show you my solution - I hope that it is a solution. ;-)
My config on the switch(stack):
switch#show etherchannel summary
Group Port-channel Protocol    Ports
------+-------------+-----------+-----------------------------------------------
2      Po2(SU)         LACP      Gi3/0/3(P) Gi4/0/3(P)
switch#show running-config interface GigabitEthernet 3/0/3
Building configuration...
Current configuration : 172 bytes
interface GigabitEthernet3/0/3
description myserver, eth0
switchport access vlan 20
switchport mode access
channel-group 2 mode active
spanning-tree portfast
end
lansw01#show running-config interface GigabitEthernet 4/0/3
Building configuration...
Current configuration : 172 bytes
interface GigabitEthernet4/0/3
description myserver, eth1
switchport access vlan 20
switchport mode access
channel-group 2 mode active
spanning-tree portfast
end
switch#show running-config interface port-channel 2
Building configuration...
Current configuration : 82 bytes
interface Port-channel2
switchport access vlan 20
switchport mode access
end
The /etc/network/interfaces of my Debian machine looks like this:
auto lo
iface lo inet loopback
auto bond0
        iface bond0 inet static
        address 192.168.1.xxx
        netmask 255.255.255.0
        gateway 192.168.1.xxx
        dns-nameservers 192.168.1.xxx
        dns-search xxx.xxx.xxx
        bond-mode 4
        bond-miimon 100
        bond-downdelay 200
        bond-updelay 200
        bond-lacp-rate 1
        slaves eth0 eth1
This setup seems to work well. But I'm wondering that there is nothing with "trunking" in my setup. Would you like to give me your opinion about this?
Thanks a lot and many greets
Stephan

Error in switch ports POE model, "Cisco Catalyst 2960S-24PS-L Switch"

I have problem with the poe switch Cisco Catalyst 2960S-24PS-L posts does not respond, and me the following error resporta was t
%PLATFORM_ENV-3-ILP_PORT_POST_ERR: %s can’t be brought up because it failed POST
in Inline Power test.
he source of that error and what are the possible causes

Hey Dustin,
Device needs to be RMA'ed. The inline power supply has failed.
HTH.
Regards,
RS.

Last version Cisco Catalyst 2960-24PC-L Switch (bugs study)

Hi team,
I need know, what´s the last IOS version to Cisco Catalyst 2960-24PC-L Switch and understand the bug study about these versions?
How make a bug study?
If you have any information, please let me know.
Regards,
Yerko.

Latest release as of January 14th is 15.0.2-SE5 (Release Nov 6, 2013)
There aren't any public utilities in the Cisco website that provides you with a bug study.
We have a bug tracker https://tools.cisco.com/bugsearch/?referring_site=popular but it will be extremely time consuming to identify each bugs and if you are affected.
If you are a Cisco Advanced customer with optimization services in your contract, this deliverable can be done for you at no cost.

Stacking a non-Cisco Switch with a Catalyst Express 500 switch

We are using a Cisco Catalyst Express 500 Ethernet switch and need to add another switch to get a few more ports. Is is possible to stack a Catalyst Express 500 Ethernet switch with a non-Cisco Ethernet switch. If so, is there any Cisco documentation telling how to do this?

If by stack, you mean connect the two switches via Ethernet ports, yes you should be able to do that. Depending on the port capabilities of the switches, and whether they have any special uplink ports, you might need to use a different Ethernet connecting cable (cross-over vs. straight thru).

Cisco catalyst 2690 switch vlanTable

Hi,
I have a cisco catalyst 2690 switch.
I want monitoring IP, MAC, and Port Address.
I use this docu: http://docstore.mik.ua/orelly/perl/sysadmin/ch10_03.htm
This works great:
htvtef7-nagios:/ # snmptranslate -On BRIDGE-MIB:dot1dTpFdbTable
.1.3.6.1.2.1.17.4.3
snmpwalk -c tef7snmp@761 -v 2c 10.76.1.7 .1.3.6.1.2.1.17.4.3
htvtef7-nagios:/ # snmptranslate -On BRIDGE-MIB:dot1dBasePortTable
.1.3.6.1.2.1.17.1.4
snmpwalk -c tef7snmp@761 -v 2c 10.76.1.7 .1.3.6.1.2.1.17.1.4
htvtef7-nagios:/ # snmptranslate -On CISCO-STACK-MIB:vlanTable
.1.3.6.1.4.1.9.5.1.9.2
But I get a error:
htvtef7-nagios:/ # snmpwalk -c tef7snmp -v 2c 10.76.1.7 .1.3.6.1.4.1.9.5.1.9.2
SNMPv2-SMI::enterprises.9.5.1.9.2 = No Such Object available on this agent at this OID
Switch config:
snmp-server community testament RO
snmp-server community tef7snmp RO
snmp-server location XYZ
snmp-server contact MR.XYZ
snmp-server enable traps snmp authentication linkdown linkup coldstart warmstart
snmp-server enable traps tty
snmp-server enable traps cluster
snmp-server enable traps entity
snmp-server enable traps cpu threshold
snmp-server enable traps vtp
snmp-server enable traps vlancreate
snmp-server enable traps vlandelete
snmp-server enable traps flash insertion removal
snmp-server enable traps port-security
snmp-server enable traps envmon
snmp-server enable traps mac-notification
snmp-server enable traps copy-config
snmp-server enable traps config
snmp-server enable traps bridge newroot topologychange
snmp-server enable traps stpx inconsistency root-inconsistency loop-inconsistency
snmp-server enable traps syslog
snmp-server enable traps vlan-membership
snmp-server host XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX public
snmp-server host YYY.YYY.YYY.YYY tef7snmp
What did I do wrong?
THX!

/* Style Definitions */
table.MsoNormalTable
{mso-style-name:"Normál táblázat";
mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0;
mso-tstyle-colband-size:0;
mso-style-noshow:yes;
mso-style-parent:"";
mso-padding-alt:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;
mso-para-margin:0cm;
mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt;
mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman";
mso-ansi-language:#0400;
mso-fareast-language:#0400;
mso-bidi-language:#0400;}
Thx for the replay!
I use on the switch c2960-lanbasek9-mz.122-25.SEE3.bin (IOS),
the Cisco Feature Navigator say, this IOS support the CISCO-STACK-MIB:
http://tools.cisco.com/ITDIT/MIBS/MainServlet?ReleaseSel=0&PlatformSel=0&fsSel=0&IMAGE_NAME=c2960-lanbasek9-mz.122-25.SEE3.bin&SUBMIT2=Submit&IMAGE_ID=816103
In show snmp mib I could not find the vlanTable. See the attachment.
I du not understand!

DHCP on Cisco Catalyst 2950 Switch

Hello
I need to configure my cisco catalyst 2950 series switch in order to act as DHCP server for devices connected to its ports.
Please say me, how to do that ?
Thank you
Narek

Please find the sample DHCP configuration for one of the VLANs.
Interface Vlan1
description Cisco DHCP
ip address 10.10.2.1 255.255.255.0
ip dhcp pool cisco
network 10.10.2.0 255.255.255.0
default-router 10.10.2.1
domain-name mydomain.com
dns-server 10.10.2.10
netbios-name-server 10.10.2.15
lease 7
A 24 hour lease is the default if left out and the netbios-name-server is WINS in the Windows world.
If you want to use DHCP server for other VLANs as well create similar DHCP pools and assign the DG to the corresponding VLAN interface IP.
HTH, rate if it does
Narayan

Alternative switch to Cisco Catalyst 3750v2-24FS and 3750-24FS

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for