Alternative to parameterized mapping

Hello,
We are in
Service Pack: 08
Release: NW711_08_REL
Scenario : File to IDOC
We are using parameterized mapping for this scenario and we have configured some values in the interface determination in parameter for Operation Mapping. During the transport there are chances of overwriting the same in the QA or Prod system. Also sometime it is difficult to maintain all these values manually in the respective systems.
Is there a better way we can handle this situation? Or is there a better alternative to the parameterized mapping?
Thanks
SK

Have you consider the Value Mapping approach?
http://www.riyaz.net/sap/xipi-value-mapping-using-graphical-editor/382/
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/2a/9d2891cc976549a9ad9f81e9b8db25/frameset.htm
http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/index?rid=/library/uuid/00ee347e-aabb-2a10-b298-d15a1ebf43c5

Similar Messages

Parameterized mapping in PI 7.31 Dual Stack

Hi All,
I am working on PI 7.31 Dual Stack. I am getting the below exception in parameterized mapping:
com.sap.aii.utilxi.misc.api.BaseRuntimeException; com.sap.aii.mapping.api.UndefinedParameterException: The input-parameter TestVal does not exist.
I could test in MM test tab but facing the issue in runtime. Please suggest me where I am going wrong.
Thanks,
Madhurima

Hi Madhurima,
Have you checked if your PI version and patch level is being affected with this note 1933139 - Errors during execution of operation mapping with message mapping parameters names different from the operation mapping parameter names?
Regards.

How to pass input parameter (parameterized mapping) to java mapping program

Hello
I have a question about the parameterized mapping with Java (PI 7.1).
In the operation mapping (using Java-class) I defined a inputer parameter (string). I think I am supposed to retrieved the value using:
arg0.getInputParameters().getString("myInputParameterName");
where arg0 is the TransformationInput object.
However I am not able to get the value, I got runtime exception saying the inputer parameter doesn't exit.
Then I figured out maybe I need to bind the OM input parameter to Java mapping parameter, just like in case of message mapping, you need to bind OM parameter to MM parameter. However there is no way to define input parameter for the java mapping program.
Anybody has done java mapping with parameterized mapping?
Anybody can give any hint for this?
Thanks
Jayson

InputParameters params = container.getInputParameters();
DynamicConfiguration conf = (DynamicConfiguration) params.getValue(StreamTransformationConstants.DYNAMIC_CONFIGURATION);
DynamicConfigurationKey key = DynamicConfigurationKey.create("http://sap.com/xi/XI/System/File", "Directory");
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nwpi71/helpdata/en/43/03612cdecc6e76e10000000a422035/content.htm
Edited by: Anand on Dec 10, 2008 4:13 PM

AAE doesn't support parameterized mapping ?

Hi,
is the AAE doesn't support parameterized mapping ? if yes any workaround for this limitation ? because i want to use JDBC lookup in my mapping ?
Currently, i am using PI 7.1 EHP1 SP3.
Thank You and Best Regards
Fernand

One thing more, as you can't use it it may bother you as you won't be able to use the new box in the graphical mapping to do look ups (JDBC, or RFC), as both boxes get the channel from a parameter.
However, you can still create your own UDF and do the lookup manually with java code, it's not a big issue. I had to do it for RFC lookups some times.

Integrated configuration with parameterized mapping

Dear All,
My scenario is using integrated configuration AAE. I am trying parameterized mapping with Integrated configuratiion but it throws an error saying that AAE doesnt support parameterized mapping.
I am uisng PI 7.1 I wanted to know doest PI 7.3 support this or which service pack on PI 7.1 support Parametrized mapping with AEE.
Any thoughs on this.
chirag

Hi Chirag,
Integrated Configuration Scenario with Parameterized mapping is not supported in PI 7.1, 7.1 EHP1 or even in 7.3
This is a limitation with AAE based scenarios. However, you can still use Parameterized mapping in Classical Scenarios(ID,RD,SA,RA). This is well supported in PI 7.1 and higher versions.
Please take a look for the CAUTION statement in the following link:
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw73/helpdata/en/94/75de6590d64673b1e94ac072842ee3/content.htm
I hope this helps.
Regards,
Gaurav.

How to implement parameterized mapping ?

what are the steps required to implement parameterized mapping?

Hi Valli,
Please use the SCN search or google search for basic questions.
For example:https://www.google.es/search?q=SAP+PI+parameterized+mapping&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&gws_rd=cr&ei=rbU_VfKHFYGnUPyzgJAD
You can find some example like this:
http://scn.sap.com/people/jin.shin/blog/2008/02/14/sap-pi-71-mapping-enhancements-series-parameterized-message-mappings
Regards.

Suggested alternative to key mapping?

Hello!
I started using Abelton live for putting together easily accessible virtual instruments for live performance. For example, if my band performs the entire Dark Side of the Moon album, I can create each song in order of the album with the necessary pianos,synths, and organs for each and easily enable/disable them with the use of key mapping (assigning on screen functions to keys on my laptops keypad, just to be thorough) I have a M-Audio Keystation 61 which is a very simple midi controller and doesn't have any knobs for a lot of on screen control. So the use of key mapping is important for me.
I like the layout and simplicity of Mainstage and would rather use it for this sort of thing, but without key mapping I have no quick way of (for example) muting and unmuting instruments within each song/performance other than trying to do it with the mouse, which is too sketchy for live performance.
Also with Abelton, I could assign the volume slider on my midi controller to multiple channels/instruments, i.e. control volume for 2 or 3 instruments at once, mainstage only lets me assign one on screen function per project to a single midi hardware control
I don't know a ton about Mainstage, so my questions are ...
1. Is there an alternative to key mapping for mainstage?
2. Is it possible to assign multiple on screen functions to one hardware control?
Thanks!

Hi
Lootinant wrote:
1. Is there an alternative to key mapping for mainstage?
If you are 'short' of buttons/switches on your keyboard controller, you could create screen-controls assigned to (say) the lowest notes on your keyboard, and then map them to Next/Previous patch Actions in order to change Patches in MS.
Lootinant wrote:
2. Is it possible to assign multiple on screen functions to one hardware control?
Multiple mappings are possible via the Screen Control Inspector (or the new Assignments and Mappings Pane). Select the Screen Control, and in the Inspector click the '+" button (top right of the Inspector) to add an additional mapping.
CCT

Alternatives to Nokia Maps (Google / Navigon Mobil...

For my N82 I am looking for an alternative to Nokia Maps.
- Using Google Maps, is it possible do download the map data for a country or continent to the pnone's memory card in advance so that they do not have to be loaded on the fly over the expensive GSM connection?
- Has anybody tried Navigon's Mobile Navigator on an N82? How well does it work?
- Are ther any other 'recommendable' map programs for the N82?
Andreas

28-Sep-2008 06:23 AM
avoelp wrote:
Are ther any other 'recommendable' map programs for the N82?
Andreas
Hi avoelp
Garmin XT seems to be attracting favourable reviews:
http://www8.garmin.com/mobile/mobilext/
Happy to have helped forum in a small way with a Support Ratio = 37.0

Parameterized Mapping - Binding Problem

Hi All,
I am using a parameterized mapping and i have given 2 import parameters in OM and also in Interface Determination. I am getting below error. anyone faced this problem before?
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
- 
- <SAP:Error xmlns:SAP="http://sap.com/xi/XI/Message/30" xmlns:SOAP="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/" SOAP:mustUnderstand="">
<SAP:Category>Application</SAP:Category>
<SAP:Code area="MAPPING">TX_MISSING_IDET_PROP</SAP:Code>
<SAP:P1>B113C2A0483E11E1C980A298F37B7F02</SAP:P1>
<SAP:P2 />
<SAP:P3 />
<SAP:P4 />
<SAP:AdditionalText />
<SAP:Stack>Parameter binding (ID = B113C2A0483E11E1C980A298F37B7F02) for interface determination is missing</SAP:Stack>
<SAP:Retry>M</SAP:Retry>
</SAP:Error>

After creating binding variable in ESR, you have to create binding variable in the interface determination. The value you pass over there is saved in the created variable in operation mapping. Hope you understand.
Refer setting parameter values in interface determination portion of the link
SAP PI 7.1 Mapping Enhancements Series: Parameterized Message Mappings
Also activate and refresh cache. Sometime this might be due to caching problem and not properly set the parameter values.
Hope that helps.

Parameterized mapping in pi 7.1

Hi All
In PI 7.1 you can make use of parameters, I want to use the import parameter to pass to my java mapping. The question is can the import parameters only be constants or is there a way to make the fields dynamic? For instance get the value from source structure and pass it to java mapping.

> For instance get the value from source structure and pass it to java mapping.
When you have the value in source structure, you can access it in your Java mapping anyway, so why do you want this feature?
When you have several mapping steps, you can pass parameters from one mapping to another, and inside a BPM you can provide parameter values from container objects, but in a standard single mapping it is not possible to use dynamic values.

Problems with parameterized mapping in BPM

Hi
I am using an RFC lookup in a message mapping. I have declared the parameters/bindings in Message Mapping and Operations Mapping, but when I use the Operations Mapping in a transformation step in my BPM, I am asked for an "import" value. There are no values to be selected. What do I do?
Thanks!
regards Ole

In your integration process, define the import parameter under Configurable Parameters category.
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nwpi71/helpdata/en/44/1f1a5c932d0d19e10000000a114a6b/frameset.htm
Regards,
Prateek

Need help on Parameterized mapping in PI 7.1

Dear all,
i had a requirement in which Username, password & client values should pass from interface determination and these values should call through the java mapping. i had gone through some of the discussions in SCN , but i cant understand. So can any one please explain step by step with java mapping.
thanks in advance.

hi Shaik Samir,
In this pic you can see the user is creating the parameter called TAG_NAME with a value "TAG"
Then the java mapping code reads this parameter here in this line
String inParam = arg0.getInputParameters().getString("TAG_NAME");
In the string inParam we will have the value "TAG". You can do whatever you want with this value.
Similarly you can write your own java code in NWDS as given in this sample mapping here
http://wiki.scn.sap.com/wiki/display/XI/Parametrized+Java+Mapping+in+PI+7.1?original_fqdn=wiki.sdn.sap.com
In your case you need to add Username, password & client values as parameters and their values as shown above and use them in your mapping. Hope I could explain you the process.
All the best.
Regards
Anupam

Function module parameters mapping

Hi Expert,
We are working on a upgradation tool in which i have to repace the obsolete function module "HELP_VALUES_GET_WITH_CHECKTAB
" by "F4IF_FIELD_VALUE_REQUEST
". I am not sure about the functionalities of these function modules as i have never used it. Can anyone please help me by providing some information abt these FMs. Also i need to do the mapping of parameters of old and new function module. So please provide the details of mapping also. Any pointers on this will be highly appreciated.
Thanks & Regards,
P Sharma
Moderator message : Duplicate post locked. Read forum rules before posting.
Edited by: Vinod Kumar on Jul 8, 2011 9:55 AM

please check the below link.
http://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/display/ERP6/FMHELP_VALUES_GET_WITH_TABLEobsoleteReplacewith+F4IF_INT_TABLE_VALUE_REQUEST
Edited by: SAP2011 on Jul 8, 2011 4:17 AM

Parameterized mapping GUI to XSLT

Hi I am using parameterized message mapping in PI 7.1, in which I am passing values to message (graphical mapping). The graphical mapping is receiving those values and storing them to DynamicConfiguration key/value pairs. I have written a UDF for that and the UDF does all the job of setting DynamicConfiguration and returns empty string to the target message root element.
Then, in operation mapping I am placing the above message mapping first followed by the XSLT mapping step. The XSLT mapping is reading the Dynamic parameters set earlier by the message mapping step and using the same populating the XML tags. The objective of the XSLT mapping is to create SOAP envelope with the above fields (parameters) as custom header fields in the SOAP header.
I see that the SOAP envelope is created correctly by the XSLT with the SOAP body containing all values. But the SOAP header is not the getting the values from the DynamicConfiguration set by the message mapping.
Question: Is it possible to pass values like this between message(graphical) mapping to XSLT mapping? Are they stored in memory or is it that the moment the next mapping is called, the DynamicConfiguration values are lost?
Thanks for your help

Hi saisach,
I can tell you the easiest way to achive your requirenment.
In First Message Mapping.:
Add a filename field under header node in the receiver structure
Suppose your receiver structure is:
<Test>
<Name>Sai</Name
</Test>
Then modify it like below.
<Test>
<DummyHeader>
<FileName>TestFile.txt</FileName>
</DummyHeader>
<Name>Sai</Name
</Test>
And also map the dynamic confuration value to FileName Field.
Then in your SOAP envelope creation XSLT mapping read the Dynamic value from this FileName Field and do what you want.
Create Third simple XSLT mapping to remove the DummyHeader Field.

Parameterized Mapping

I have an Object that has a one to many collection. It currently is a managed privately owned, lazy initialized (indirection). Is it possible to parameterize this mapping by passing in or calling a method to get the parameters?
I'm currently using Java to define the mappings so I have full control over everything. I know this is possible if I don't want it to be a managed collection. I wouldn't to keep it managed, so I can use the Toplink Cache when grabbing the attached collection.

Correct, I would like to set the date and then have the collection filed with the attributes matching that date.
So there is not way to pass in an argument that will be used as part of the selection criteria? In your example I wouldn't want to load all of the objects and then manually added the objects that match the date to the collection. That would require loading up all of the objects from the database. I need a way to only load a subset of the objects from the database. The way I would envision this happening would be to set the argument by calling a method on the object such as getDate() and it will pass in that value into the SQL WHERE clause.
I've been looking at the documentation, is there a way to do this by using a parameterized database call? It looks like I can set the selectionCall for a mapping. I just don't know how to pass in the arguments. I need the ability to set the method "getDate" as the argument for the filter clause.
Any additional insight would be helpful. Obviously there are workarounds, but it would be helpful to have this ability natively supported within toplink/eclipselink.

Alternative to parameterized mapping

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for