Alternative to Wait step.....

Hi,
I needid that I have to send the messages based on time.
There are 2 receiver,I need to receive in 10 minitues and the other in 180 minutes.
Please Explain me the same in step by step in detailed way.
Thanks in advance,
P.Srini

Hi Srini,
First you need have in BPM
In the below both cases you should have the correlation.
If you use two receive step one by one sequentially in Blok or out side.
1.Wait step with wait time 10 minitues before first receive step.
2.wait step between the two receivers can have the 180 min duration.
If you have two receive steps in fork this will not work do as follows.
if you use fork - message should allot randomly to receive step either 1 or 2.
there if msg1 is in fork first branch, msge 2 in second branch of fork,
use wait step before receive step with 10,180 min duration.
I hope you got it clear, else let me know clearly.
Regards
Chilla..

Similar Messages

Alternative to Wait step in BPM

Hi,
I needid that I have to send the messages based on time.
There are 2 receiver,I need to receive in 10 minitues and the other in 180 minutes.
Please Explain me the same in step by step in detailed way.
Thanks in advance,
P.Srini

My idea is same as that of Gareth.
Use a fork with two branches, each having a send mail step for each agent.
fix the desired time in the requested start of each step.
End condition for the fork will be 2 out of 2.
regards,
Sandeep Josyula

Wait Step in Workflow

Hi Workflow gurus,
I have 2 questions want to ask.
1. We have a wait step deadline monitoring in our workflow project. Let's say 30 day wait period. After 30 days workflow is getting triggered & everything works fine. But that is really required in Production. In Dev/QA systems we do not want to wait really 30 day. We want a small time period, let's say 1 day. Now what is the best way to handle this? Meaning Different time periods for different systems for the same workflow & same wait step period.
2. If a work item is waiting for a wait step to be completed(for ex waiting for 60 day wait period) before 60 day itself,
can we execute manually that work item using any std report?
Kindly help me.
Thanks,
Pandu.

Hi Pandu,
1. There are a couple of things you can do in this instance. You could manually remove the deadline after the 1 day threshold.
Open the work item and select Edit -> Change -> Change Deadline -> Excute and then remove the Requested Start deadline
(ensure you have Technical View set for the work item display)
Deadline monitoring (SWWDHEX) will have to execute before the work item will transition out of a Waiting state.
Alternatively you could store the deadline parameter externally in a config table somewhere and retrieve it into the workflow for use with your deadline. Obviously when you change the configuration from 30 days to 1 taking care to ensure that the changes are not transported to prod. Not really fond of this since there is a risk of transporting the changes.
2. Transactions like SWIA don't allow you to execute work items in a Waiting state. So as above go into the work item and either change the deadline or execute.
I hope this helps,
Best Regards,
Trevor

Abap-Class-Event in Wait Step

Hi guys,
in my workflow i have an activity with an abap method. This method works like a dialog. This means, i get a workitem in the business-workplace which shows a webdynpro where a pdf is displayed and where i can choose whether i click on button1 or button2.
When i click on one button, an abap-class event will be created. This event has a container. My target is, to bring the user desicion back to the workflow via event.
When i start a new workflow with this event then it works fine. But i dont want 2 workflows. I need a solution with one workflow. So i use a fork in my workflow. In branch 1 i have the activity which displays the pdf and create the event. In the other branch i have a waiting step, which waits for the event and bring the user-desision from the event-container to my workflow-container.
That was my plan, but it dont works this way. I checked the event-trace and theres no receaiver entered for my event. So my workflow stoped at the wait-step (wait step is ready).
I read, the the workflow system is automatikly doing the type-linkage and the instance-linkage, but i found only the instance-linkage filled. Can it be, that the wait step is only working with BOR-Events?
Any ideas?

Hi swangir,
i tryed this FW SAP_WAPI_WRITE_CONTAINER some days ago. I can use SAP_WAPI_READ_CONTAINER easylie but when i try to modify the container then i get an enqeue exception in the SAP_WAPI_WRITE_CONTAINER FM. I guess this came up, because i call the webdynpro from an activie-step in the workflow and not a dialog-step. So i guess the container is locked and i cant write. I also tried to unlock it with dequee_e_ .. FM i forgot the name. But it also didnt work.
Thats why i tryed to bring the user desision via event back to the workflow. And it works, as long i use 2 workflows, like i explained in my first post.
What do u mean with...
"Alternatively, you can bind back the class event container to workflow container by binding back from the dialogue step."
Andre

Reading the value of the "WaitForTarget" attribute of the Wait step

I am trying to access the "Step.WaitForTarget" attribute for the Wait step but can't find the correct syntax to use in an expression or the correct API calls to use in an action step. I intend to use this in an expression as I am looking for a specific value.
I have a object reference to the step that I am testing (Locals.StepRef) and from that I have no issues reading the standard attributes like name, step type, preconditions, etc...
How do we access the special additional properties of the wait step ?
Solved!
Go to Solution.

Hey 4watt,
One easy way to do this is to access the step reference as a PropertyObject and use GetValNumber to obtain the value. For example:
Locals.StepRef.AsPropertyObject.GetValNumber("WaitForTarget",0)
I tested this out and it does correctly return the value of WaitForTarget. Let us know if you need any more assistance!
Daniel E.
TestStand Product Support Engineer
National Instruments

Using WAIT step in Sync/Async Bridge

I am using a sync/async bridge and placed a 1 minute wait step in between my async send and async reply. When I test my process, the async reply comes in but then my 1 minute wait eventually times out and gives me an error. Can someone guide me in fixing this BPM design (which steps to add and how)?
http://webpages.charter.net/kpwendel/bpm_with_wait.jpg
I would like it to stop waiting once the async reply comes in and not timeout. If the 1 minute mark comes and a reply never came in, it would also be nice to send back an error message.
Thanks!

I pulled my WAIT task and had this scenario working a week ago. I have not made any changes, but now my inbound replies to close the BPM and link up to the request are not "linking". The request is eventually timing out even though the reply with a good correlation id comes in successfully. Any suggestions?
UPDATE: I went through my objects in the IB:Config and resaved/activated them and now it is working. Don't know what messed them up in the first place.
Message was edited by: Keith Wendel

BPM wait step : RWB"To Be Delivered status": SXMB_MONI"Message being sent"

Hi All,
I have a BPM interface running fine since 1 year.
In this BPM I have wait step for 5 minutes.
But yesterday message is stopped on wait and not proceeding ahead.
I checked XML is good as per mapping. and in runtime wirk bench message is still in "To Be Delivered status"
and in SXMB_MONI message column Outbound Status still showing "Message being sent" even after 12 hours.(wait is only 5 minutes). And below is the trace of last message.
Please guide how to handle or restart this message. in SMQ1 & SMQ2 there are no queues showing:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
- 
- <SAP:Trace xmlns:SAP="http://sap.com/xi/XI/Message/30">
<Trace level="1" type="T">--start determination of sender interface action</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">select interface Request_SI</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">select interface namespace https://www.XXXXX.com/YYYY</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">--start determination of receiver interface action</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Loop 0000000001</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">select interface Request_SI</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">select interface namespace https://www.XXXXX.com/YYYY</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">--start determination of sender interface action</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Hence set action to DEL</Trace>
</SAP:Trace>
Regards

Solved, few BASIS jobs were inactive in transaction code "SWF_XI_CUSTOMIZING".

BPM(with wait step) calling another BPM

Hello,
I have this scenario whereby i need to call a BPM from another BPM process. Call it BPM1 and BPM2. BPM1 will have a Sync-Send-step to call BPM2.
The following is what i have setup:-
Working OKAY:-
BPM1 (receive from file, send syn step to BPM2) --> BPM2(receive step (Open S/A Brige) from BPM1, send step (Close S/A Bridge))
But if i put an wait step (for 1 minute, see below) before the send syn step in BPM1, i will have problem and the queue in BPM1 show "STOP" and the BPM2 queue show "RETRY".
Problem:-
BPM1 (receive from file, wait step, send syn step to BPM2) --> BPM2(receive step (Open S/A Brige) from BPM1, send step (Close S/A Bridge))
Yes, the RETRY will work but the problem is, my BPM1 has already timeout and has ERROR (see from SWWL) and BPM2 has exceptional error in the Close A/S Bridge send step (because it can't send back to BPM1).
Anyone has any idea how to resolve this? and hopefully the above is clear enough to discribe the problem that i'm facing now.
Any suggestions are welcome, scott.

The minimum BPM-wait duration is 1 min and cannot be decreased below that....

BPM Wait step!

Friends,
I have BPM which has the FOR-EACH Block in it. After the first message processed I have to wait for atleast 5 seconds to process the next message in FOR-EACH Block. The default BPM wait step has minimum of 1 Minute. Is there any other way we can make to wait for x seconds?
Please let me know!
Thanks,
raj.

The minimum BPM-wait duration is 1 min and cannot be decreased below that....

ABAP OO class-based workflow, wait step

Hello,
I'm hoping someone is able to help me. I've implemented a class which triggers a custom workflow through a custom event of the class. At one point during the workflow I want to use a wait step that waits for another custom event to occur. I've created my second event which I want to trigger from an ABAP ALV Grid report for users, that will allow them to select the specific workflows to trigger this event for. My problem is, I am having trouble figuring out how to find the correct object instance of my class from within the ABAP program and trigger the event specifically for that instance, so that the workflow can continue and eventually complete. I have implemented the IF_WORKFLOW interface and up to this point the workflow is functioning correctly.
Thanks,
Leslie

Hello,
Sorry, not sure where my brain was. Actually I do know: at two clients with projects going live this month, so apologies for a rushed and inaccurate response. It's CL_SWF_EVT_EVENT.
Jocelyn's blog I referred to includes a code sample using the same class on how to raise an event with an object key.
Regarding your second question: No you don't need to do any binding. Just use an instance of your object and it will wait for an event with the same key. The WF part is very straightforward and works exactly like BOR, it's just raising event that can't be done with the WAPI.
Cheers,
Mike

Wait step in BPM

Hi All,
The minimum BPM-wait duration is 1 min and cannot be decreased below that....can we use 0.5 for 1/2 min.
or can any one suggest what would be alternate option to achieve 2 to 3 min delay.
One solution is to write a mapping and use udf to delay for one 2 to 3 seconds.Apart from this any other better solution
Please suggest
Regards,
Vidya

Introducing a delay of les than a minute is not possible in the BPM (using a Wait step)
The other method (using UDF in mapping....sleep.Thread) should work and does not seem to induce any performance issue.
or can any one suggest what would be alternate option to achieve 2 to 3 *min* delay.
The Wait step itself should be useful for this requirement.
For having the delay in seconds use the UDF.
Regards,
Abhishek.

Wait step in BPM stops the process permanently

Hi all.
I have a BPM with a Wait Step inside. When the process reaches the wait step the process gets locked permanently.
I execute TCODE SM12, remove the lock for the process and the process finishes without errors.
Why does the BPM hangs with the wait step? Could anybody help me with this issue.
Thanks a lot,
Gari.

Hi Gökhan.
I'm using SP12. The Self-test about BPE in RWB reports error for "Schedule Background Job for Packaging" and "Schedule Background Job for Reorganization". Details for the error say "Background job for packaging is not required".
Thanks,
Gari.

Wait step in BPM hangs!

Hello,
I am using a wait step in a BPM. Type is "Wait specified time period". The period is 2 minutes.
I can see from process monitoring that my BPM reaches the above step. And then it just hangs !!!!
Time goes by but nothing happens. The BPM never! goes to the next step.
I cannot understand it. Such a simple step is causing me great pain!!!!
Anynone outhere with similar experience ???
Thanks in advance
Dimitris Hagigeorgiou

Hi,
I know this question is inactive, but I had the same problem, and the proposed solution isn't correct. The problem came after upgrading to SP17- What had changed?
Anyways, I checked the workflow customizing (trx swf_xi_customizing) and all were checked, green and good. Finally, after lots of testing and reactivating for no good, I tried executing the checked "Schedule Background Job for Missed Deadlines" function in the workflow customizing again, and behold: the scheduled job had been rescheduled after the upgrade to start 6 months into the future!? Why? No idea, but after re-scheduling, all wait step are executed nicely.
Hope this will be helpful to some other frustrated BPM administrator someday. Regards,
Emil

Wait step in leave workflow wait for 20 min

hi friends
I have designed a multilevel ESS leave workflow. After 1st approver the status need to change from approved to sent after that i am using a wait step with condition REQ.STATUS = SENT. This condition is met immediately but it still waits there nearly 15 to 20 min after that only it goes to the next approver. I dont no y its happening even after the condition is met. There is background job SWWCOND is directly related to this wait step. I have scheduled this job for every 3 min. But its long time to execute. If i remove the wait step its shows dump. How to minimize the time of execution of the wait step.
Regards
vijay

Hello,
Let me know if I've understood the problem correctly.
You have a workflow with two wait steps.
These wait steps rely on the running of SWWCOND
to check if the conditions have been satisfied.
The workflow takes 15-20 mins to pass the first condition, even
when already true, but takes little or no time to pass the second
condition.
SWWCOND is scheduled to run every 3 mins and doesn't run for more
than a couple of minutes.
My questions:
- Are you absolutely certain SWWCOND runs every 3 minutes?
Do you see that happening in SM37 while your workflow is waiting?
- You've said that the first condition is REQ.STATUS = SENT,
what is the second condition?
- Is REQ.STATUS a virtual attribute?
- Where is REQ.STATUS set to SENT? Outside of the workflow?
Does it do so without an error? Is a commit work done?
regards
Rick Bakker
Hanabi Technology

Wait step in fork

hi all,
i have one problem in workflow i am using wait for event step in fork but the event is not coming....
i tried to create the event using function module but its not coming
i think it is taking null object so i tried using create event step in workflow but it didnt work....
i am creating the event through function module (activity) but it is not processing after that step..
i tried to search in forum but i didnt find the solution...
please help
Piyush jain

yeah i traced the event it is coming in event trace
actually i have three events in zbo created ,approved ,rejected and accordingly i defined the activity
for three events but the wait step is not processed yeah it is showing in event trace but the event is not coming in
workflow step .....i am not using correlation step in that
thanks for reply
piyush

Alternative to Wait step.....

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for