AME rendered files are bigger than in Premiere CS6

Hi!
I have a big project - 6 hours prepared for rendering in 4 sequences (each sequence is about 1h 30 minutes - 1h 45 minutes) I try to export them with H.264 - Blu ray default settings. Estimated file size for each sequence is about 17 - 20 GB, but when I export them into AME I got files 52 - 55 GB ! When I export same sequences one by one directly from Premiere CS6 I got 17 - 20 GB files. What's wrong with AME? Same input, same settings but files are more than duble sized?!
Thx!

Here are the screenshots of all export settings related to one of these projects. As you can see estimated file size is 16321 MB and when I click on "export", rendering is about 15% faster and file is about 17 GB. But when I click on "queue" rendering is slower and files are about 52 GB

Similar Messages

  • Hi, I am using HP11 and iPlanet web server. When trying to upload files over HTTP using FORM ENCTYPE="multipart/form-data" that are bigger than a few Kilobytes i get a 408 error. (client timeout).

    Hi, I am using HP11 and iPlanet web server. When trying to upload files over HTTP using FORM ENCTYPE="multipart/form-data" that are bigger than a few Kilobytes i get a 408 error. (client timeout). It is as if the server has decided that the client has timed out during the file upload. The default setting is 30 seconds for AcceptTimeout in the magnus.conf file. This should be ample to get the file across, even increasing this to 2 minutes just produces the same error after 2 minutes. Any help appreciated. Apologies if this is not the correct forum for this, I couldn't see one for iPlanet and Web, many thanks, Kieran.

    Hi,
    You didnt mention which version of IWS. follow these steps.
    (1)Goto Web Server Administration Server, select the server you want to manage.
    (2)Select Preference >> Perfomance Tuning.
    (3)set HTTP Persistent Connection Timeout to your choice (eg 180 sec for three minutes)
    (4) Apply changes and restart the server.
    *Setting the timeout to a lower value, however, may    prevent the transfer of large files as timeout does not refer to the time that the connection has been idle. For example, if you are using a 2400 baud modem, and the request timeout is set to 180 seconds, then the maximum file size that can be transferred before   the connection is closed is 432000 bits (2400 multiplied by 180)
    Regards
    T.Raghulan
    [email protected]

  • Apache 2.0.x and large file support (bigger than 2GB)

    I've seen on the mail list people complaining that apache 2.0.55 can't serve files bigger than 2GB.
    The sollution is to compile with this option:
    export CPPFLAGS="-D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64"
    (and this is default in 2.2.x)
    Now, an Apache compiled with those options is most probably not binary compatible with mod_php or mod_python or other out-of-tree apache modules, so they'll need recompileing too.
    Now, I've noticed that /home/httpd/build/config_vars.mk needs to be patched too, so that the php and python modules pick up the setting when compiled.
    You need to find the EXTRA_CPPFLAGS variable and add the two defines from above to it.. At the end it should look something like this:
    EXTRA_CPPFLAGS = -DLINUX=2 -D_REENTRANT -D_XOPEN_SOURCE=500 -D_BSD_SOURCE -D_SVID_SOURCE -D_GNU_SOURCE -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64
    BTW in lighttpd (well at least in 1.4.11) the --enable-lfs is enabled by default.

    I've seen on the mail list people complaining that apache 2.0.55 can't serve files bigger than 2GB.
    The sollution is to compile with this option:
    export CPPFLAGS="-D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64"
    (and this is default in 2.2.x)
    Now, an Apache compiled with those options is most probably not binary compatible with mod_php or mod_python or other out-of-tree apache modules, so they'll need recompileing too.
    Now, I've noticed that /home/httpd/build/config_vars.mk needs to be patched too, so that the php and python modules pick up the setting when compiled.
    You need to find the EXTRA_CPPFLAGS variable and add the two defines from above to it.. At the end it should look something like this:
    EXTRA_CPPFLAGS = -DLINUX=2 -D_REENTRANT -D_XOPEN_SOURCE=500 -D_BSD_SOURCE -D_SVID_SOURCE -D_GNU_SOURCE -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64
    BTW in lighttpd (well at least in 1.4.11) the --enable-lfs is enabled by default.

  • Why DNG files are bigger when converting from TIFF?

    When I shoot in RAW, my normal workflow is to convert all images to DNG and start editing in Lightroom. But as you know, there are some photos that need extra editing in pixel based software such as Photoshop.
    When I right-click a DNG in Lightroom and chose "Edit In... » Edit in Adobe Photoshop", the photo will be opened in Photoshop as an 8-bit TIFF file for editing. For demonstration of my issue, let's assume I don't do any changes and just save the file as it is. A new TIFF file will be created next to the source DNG with "-Edit" in it's name.
    Back into Lightroom, both files are almost the same, one is DNG, the other in 8-bit TIFF. From this point (assuming I did change something in Photoshop, otherwise what would be the point in opening it there) I should do my further editing in Lightroom in the TIFF and not the DNG one. Let's say I'm done with the work and export the final edited TIFF file back into a DNG (I like this format and I like to keep all metadata changes so I can easily revert back to the original). I've also exported the original DNG file for comparison.
    And now I realize the following:
    DNG to DNG » ~7Mb (basically the same as the original DNG)
    TIFF to DNG » ~15Mb
    Why such a big difference?
    I didn't do any editing either in the original DNG or the Photoshop converted TIFF. Any techincal reason for this that I'm not aware or am I doing something wrong?

    I did a little bit of research and:
    1) The embedded previews are always JPEG files (medim or full size, doesn't matter). But now that I think about it, I don't think you were talking about the previews when you mentioned the TIFF being embedded.
    2) I did a quick EXIF lookup on 3 files exported to DNG: a) Original DNG b) 16-bit TIFF converted to DNG c) 8-bit converted to DNG. Here's the EXIF results:
    a)
    SubfileType                     : Full-resolution Image
    ImageWidth                      : 3736
    ImageHeight                     : 2772
    BitsPerSample                   : 16
    Compression                     : JPEG
    PhotometricInterpretation       : Color Filter Array
    SamplesPerPixel                 : 1
    b)
    SubfileType                     : Full-resolution Image
    ImageWidth                      : 3648
    ImageHeight                     : 2736
    BitsPerSample                   : 16 16 16
    Compression                     : JPEG
    PhotometricInterpretation       : Linear Raw
    SamplesPerPixel                 : 3
    c)
    SubfileType                     : Full-resolution Image
    ImageWidth                      : 3648
    ImageHeight                     : 2736
    BitsPerSample                   : 8 8 8
    Compression                     : JPEG
    PhotometricInterpretation       : Linear Raw
    SamplesPerPixel                 : 3
    This probably means something like you said... The embedded files are different and some take more space than the others. The first one is 7.220Kb, the second one (16-bit TIFF) is 44.030Kb and the third one (8-bit TIFF) is 15.284Kb.
    It makes sense I guess, but I still would love to hear a more technical explanation for it but it's obvious it has something to do on how the pixels are saved in the DNG file. The keyword is probably the PhotometricInterpretation.

  • Time Machine backups are bigger than expected

    Hi everyone,
    I was wondering if anyone would know why, all of a sudden after a day or two ago, my Time Machine is suddenly insisting on backing up well over 4GB at a time? Before then my backups would almost always be below the 100MB mark. Has some update happened that would have caused this?
    I have looked in Console but unfortunately am none the wiser. Is there some way of finding out a list of the files Time Machine is actually backing up? If so then I'd be able to track down this problem since I am fast running out of space on my Time Machine backup drive!
    Many thanks for listening...
    :-Joe

    Jowie,
    Consider the following info that I have gleaned, some of it may explain some it.
    *Incremental Backups Seem Too Large!*
    Time Machine performs backups at the file level. If a single bit in a large file is changed, the WHOLE file is backed up again. This is a problem for programs that save data to monolithic virtual disk files that are modified frequently. These include Parallels, VMware Fusion, Aperture vaults, or the databases that Entourage and Thunderbird create. These should be excluded from backup using the Time Machine Preference Exclusion list. You will, however, need to backup these files manually to another external disk.
    One poster observed regarding Photoshop: “If you find yourself working with large files, you may discover that TM is suddenly backing up your scratch disk's temp files. This is useless, find out how to exclude these (I'm not actually sure here). Alternatively, turn off TM whilst you work in Photoshop.” (http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?threadID=1209412)
    If you do a lot of movie editing, unless these files are excluded, expect Time Machine to treat revised versions of a single movie as entirely new files.
    If you frequently download software or video files that you only expect to keep for a short time, consider excluding the folder these are stored in from Time Machine backups.
    Files or folders that are simply moved or renamed are counted as NEW files or folders. If you rename any file or folder, Time Machine will back up the ENTIRE file or folder again no matter how big or small it is.
    George Schreyer may be describing what you are experiencing: “If you should want to do some massive rearrangement of your disk, Time Machine will interpret the rearranged files as new files and back them up again in their new locations. Just renaming a folder will cause this to happen. This is OK if you've got lots of room on your backup disk. Eventually, Time Machine will thin those backups and the space consumed will be recovered. However, if you really want recover the space in the backup volume immediately, you can. To do this, bring a Finder window to the front and then click the Time Machine icon on the dock. This will activate the Time Machine user interface. Navigate back in time to where the old stuff exists and select it. Then pull down the "action" menu (the gear thing) and select "delete all backups" and the older stuff vanishes.” (http://www.girr.org/mac_stuff/backups.html)
    *FileVault / Boot Camp / iDisk Syncing*
    Note: Leopard has changed the way it deals with FileVault disk images, so it is not necessary to exclude your Home folder it you have FileVault activated. Additionally, Time Machine ignores Boot Camp partitions as the manner in which they are formatted is incompatible. Finally, if you have your iDisk Synced to your desktop, it is not necessary to exclude the disk image file it creates as that has been changed to a sparsebundle as well in Leopard.

  • Prproj-file from PPro CC in Premiere CS6?

    How can I import a file (prproj) from Premiere Pro CC into Premiere CS6?

    You can't open a .prproj file created in CC7 in CS6.
    The best you can do is export/import an .AAF or .XML.

  • How can you move video files to a PC operating system windows xp that are bigger than 500mb?

    Iam trying to move video files from my iPad to my PC but because they are all over 500mb my OS (windows Xp) will not let me. So I am presently stuck with them on my iPad. Is there another way to move them. Please help!

    OS (windows Xp) will not let me.
    Why will it not?  What is the error message?  How are you trying to transfer them?
    There are lots of ways of moving files.
    A simple and popular way to copy files and share files amoung your devices. This will depend on you internet connection speed.
    https://www.dropbox.com/
    Using iTures to transfer files:
    http://support.apple.com/kb/HT4094?viewlocale=en_US&locale=en_US
    Files Connect -- The swiss army knife of remote file connect
    https://itunes.apple.com/us/app/files-connect/id404324302?mt=8
    Windows File server
    http://itunes.apple.com/us/app/filebrowser-access-files-on/id364738545?mt=8
    "In education and business users increasingly expect to be able to access their data anytime, anywhere and from any device."
    http://www.minnow.it/
    This thread has good info.
    https://discussions.apple.com/thread/3708341?tstart=0
    How to transfer files from your iPad to your PC with iPad to Computer Transfer
    http://www.iphone-mac.com/how-to-transfer-and-sync-contents-from-ipad-to-pc.html
    Try the combo of:
    Diskaid on your computer and FileAppPro on your iPad
    Good old FTP
    FileApp and FileApp Pro

  • Printed margins are bigger than it is viewed in adobe reader

    Hi all:
       I convert some html pages  to pdf with acrobat x pro, then I crop those margins to a small size, it looks fine in adobe reader , but when I print the pdf out , the margins of left and right are much bigger so that the font size is so small. I check none / fit to printable area with page scaling option, it doesn't work. Is there a solution to it?
      Page size is A4.
      thanks.
      Kurt

    Thanks for the reply.
    Well, I managed to print out the PDF file from my flat-mate's PC on a laser printer, so I'm guessing that the problem lies either with the Mac version of Adobe Reader 7 or the HP printer driver. As the printer copes fine with Preview, it might be Reader's fault.
    But this does mean that all hope isn't lost on my project using Pages.
    A few more investigations are needed I think.
    Tim

  • Why is the saved JPG file much bigger than the original JPG file??

    I used Image Processor in Bridge CS5 to open a jpeg, apply sharpening action and save as  a jpeg.  The bit size, color space and pixel dimensions are identical. However, when I save at Quality 12 I get a Jpeg file that is nearly DOUBLE the size of the original jpeg  Only if I drop it to Quality 10 do I get a file that approximates, but doesn't equal, the original jpeg. 
    1) Isn't 12 the same as saying 100% and as such the file size should be the about the same?
    2) why would it increase so much?  Example about 6 mb to about 12mb???
    Does this sound right? I am sure I am doing the steps and setting the parameters correctly. The action simply applies unsharp mask:
    I can set the quality to 10 and get an approximate equivalent file size...but I want the higher quality of a 100%/12 setting.
    WHAT AM I MISSING???
    Thanks  - Kevin

    WHAT AM I MISSING???
    The simple fact that JPEG is always a fully re-compressing format. Your newly created files bear no relationship to the original ones - no binary data structures are retained; the compression algorithm is always applied fresh upon the fully decoded original image and if you use different settings, the result is different. Moreover, since the initial compression artifacts become "valid pixels" once decoded, the successive compression has no way of knowing that they actually are "bad pixels" and those fine disturbances agfain result in different compression patterns. That is, after alll, why consecutive saves to JPEG will always degrade quality even at the best settings...
    Mylenium

  • Ndf & mdf files are bigger in size

    Hi,
    My mdf file is 168 GB and ndf file is 22 GB.
    What shall I do to reduce their space??
    I ran the command sp_usedspace, and this is what I got :
    Please advice...
    Regards, Kunjay Shah

    Through DBCC SHRINKFILE to release unused space and physical file size. See http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms189493.aspx.
    Second option ,delete/archive unneeded data.
    To identify tables using the most space,
    Right-click on the database node in SSMS
    select Reports >
    Standard Reports >
    Disk Usage by Top Tables.
    Ahsan Kabir Please remember to click Mark as Answer and Vote as Helpful on posts that help you. This can be beneficial to other community members reading the thread. http://www.aktechforum.blogspot.com/

  • Mov file will not open on Premiere CS6 for Windows

    I am a student working on a project that I started in university on an Apple Mac desktop. I decided to carry my project back home to continue with it on a laptop which is Windows...however the Mov. files will not open up on premeire pro and it is really frustrating as I have done a lot of work. How can I import these videos without losing any work or having to start again?

    Quicktime X does NOT work http://forums.adobe.com/thread/888722
    -Premiere Pro REQUIRES Quicktime 7 won't work with Quicktime X

  • Deduplication: how to identify which files are "in-policy" (and which are not)?

    Dear experts,
    in eventlog I find the following information for one of my deduplicated volumes:
    Volume: F: (\\?\Volume{9794e270-fb08-487e-979b-8a08fa9ca311}\)
    Error code: 0x0
    Error message:
    Savings rate: 24
    Saved space: 853327714684
    Volume used space: 2681869406208
    Volume free space: 66771247104
    Optimized file count: 1199618
    In-policy file count: 1188049
    Job processed space (bytes): 0
    Job elapsed time (seconds): 2
    Job throughput (MB/second): 0
    Some things look strange to me: 
    - The savings rate is only 24% which looks odd because I get about 40% on other file shares with similar characteristics.
    - The "Optimized file count" is higher than the "in-policy" file count.
    - The volume has about 3.5 million files but only 1.1 million files are "in-policy".
    My understanding of "in-policy" files is that all files are in-policy which are older than 3 days (if not configured different, which is not the case) and which are not contained in an excluded folder (nothing configured here) and which have no
    excluded file extension (nothing configured here apart from the default). Right?
    I'm sure that only a small fraction of the files on this volume are younger than three days, so something seems to be wrong there, but I have no idea how to find the cause of the problem.
    Is there any way to identify the files (full path) which are considered to be not "in-policy"?
    How can I find out if the optimization process really looks at all files - and doesn't skip a million?
    Thanks!
    Regards
    Christoph

    Mandy, thanks for your feedback! I've read these technet articels, but I couldn't learn something really helpfull related to my problem there. To make investigation of the problem easier I did the following:
    - created a brand new empty volume (x:) on the same server
    - enabled data deduplication on that volume with a minimal file age of 0 days
    - copied about 2GB of data from the problem-volume in 15450 files to this new volume
    - started "Start-DedupJob x: -Type Optimization -Memory 50"
    After a few seconds that job completed and I got the following result:
    Volume: X: (\\?\Volume{d1ba9ed8-28f1-44d1-9535-fe603d6a70c6}\)
    Error code: 0x0
    Error message:
    Savings rate: 0
    Saved space: 12360718
    Volume used space: 3091664896
    Volume free space: 7610097664
    Optimized file count: 153
    In-policy file count: 153
    Job processed space (bytes): 46095214
    Job elapsed time (seconds): 9
    Job throughput (MB/second): 4.88
    The question is: why are only 153 files in-policy?
    All files (of more than 15000) are of course "older than 0 days", there are no excluded folders configured, there are no excluded extensions configured, no file has one of the default excluded extensions and more than 1000 files are bigger than 100kB
    (minimal size for deduplication is 32kB). So what makes only 153 files qualify for deduplication?
    My impression is that there are further undocumented requirements which have to be met by a file to qualify for deduplication. But if there's no detailed log of an optimization run available how to find out what's going on?
    (Or is something going wrong on my server?)
    Kind Regards
    Christoph

  • Why are the PDF files in v27 bigger than in v25?

    I have just created a v27 version of my single iOS app, which has been v25 before. Now the app has a size of about 550 MB instead of about 430 MB. I found out that the PDF files of the slideshows are bigger  than before. What is the reason for this change and is there a way to get smaller file sizes again?
    Kind regards
    Michael
    No idea? At least someone of the staff should know why the DPS creates larger files now.
    There is another issue which indicates that Adobe doesn't care about file sizes. In slideshows the DPS always uses PNG files (if you don't choose PDF files, which are larger now, as I have told you). Of course it is because of transparency, but it would be easy to let the user choose between PNG and JPG like Twixl does.
    Message was edited by: Michael Kokoscha

    You should report this via Gold Support who will investigate this. Minor file size changes will always occure on releases, however since you report the size change is significant, there may be some issue and needs further testing.

  • I want to format my hard drive so i can have files bigger than 4GB what format should I use?

    I have a new hard drive that I want to format so it will work with both mac and PC (windows) but I have files that are bigger than 4GB, what format should I use?
    It needs to work with both PC and mac because I need to go between two computers etc

    If both of these computers are connect to the same router, both are in your home or place of work (Both are in the same location), it is very easy to Network them so you don't have to use DropBox or the external drive to share files between them.
    MickAUS2012 wrote:
    yea thanks for that,  i have drop box so i use that for some of my smaller files. Im just new to the mac so this is all a learning experince thanks for all your help everyone!

  • File sizes saved in MAC much bigger than saved in PC-is there a fix?

    HI everyone -
    I searched and couldn't find an answer for this specific issue so Im hoping I can be pointed in the right direction.  Appreciate any help with this issue.
    About a month ago got a MAC (I upgraded everything and have 12GB RAM so I know it's not the machine).  Prior to this was using PC Win 7 ultimate - same deal-AMD Phenom quad core, 8GB RAM (I'm only telling you this because it said to say this when you post-I'm not trying to be a dork)
    Here's my issue - I'm using CS5 on both the MAC and the PC.  I do layered TIFF files that I eventually save to JPEG.  I noticed that when Im saving these files from TiFF to JPEG on the MAC they are bigger than when I do the very same thing-same settings, etc in the PC.
    Here is what Im doing - I have my TIFF file open, I flatten it, File - Save As - JPEG.  I took the same exact file and put it on both machines to see exactly what the difference was and here is what I got when I chose quality of 8 under Image Options:
    On the MAC the file size is 264.2K
    On the PC the file size is 137.0K
    WHY??  How can I make it stop?  I have to have these files under a certain amount when I upload them and my MAC is my main computer so I have to find a fix.
    Can anyone possibly help with this?
    Thank you in advance!
    Susan
    edited to add that I am using MAC OSX 10.6.7.

    Thank you Marian!~  When I unchecked the boxes under prefs - file handling  that say ICON and WINDOWS THUMBNAIL, it changed it all for me in a good way
    Now my file sizes are the opposite!
    MAC (quality at 8) = 255KB
    PC (quality at 8) = 261KB
    You're awesome- thank you SOOO much.  That was driving me crazy!

Maybe you are looking for

  • SuperDrive not supported in iDVD 5.0.2- what to do?

    Ok, I am in serious trouble and appealing to anyone with knowledge of iMacs since 2002. I have an iMac G4 Flat Panel. It was recently updated with Tiger, Mas OS X Version 10.4.11 (only weeks before Panther was released!) This contains the programs iM

  • Error: filename, directory name or volume label syntax is incorrect

    Using Acrobat Pro 8.1.3. and Flash CS3 ... Have a link on Flash site to a PDF file for people to print/download sheet ... When link is clicked, Acrobat opens and display the error message : "there was an error opening this document. The filename, dir

  • Purpose of JEST-INACT Field

    Hi JEST table is for Individual Object Status where INACt field gives the status. I would like to know: 1. When an entry gets posted in JEST? 2. There are multiple entries for the same Object number in JEST. So, based on what criteria, I can find the

  • Plz help me in my muvo n

    [size="4" color="#0033ff">hi,? i have a MUVO N200.........} when i try to turn on the radio? it stopped? an turn off.[size="4" color="#0033ff">2} another problem>>>>when i try to record any thing?by microphon,?it also [size="4" color="#0033ff">turn o

  • Wireless connection from photosmart C4380 to HP Pavilion Home PC A340N running XP Home 32 bit.

    How do I get my printer to do wireless printing? What drivers do I need to install?  Do I need to setup a network? How do I get the printer to be set on "Direct?"  How do I get the printer to have the same SSID as my router? Presently, the blue wifi