Analog channel inserts with Logic

I continue to struggle with Logic Pro to get an efficient work flow when I use analog channel inserts during mixing. If I insert an analog compressor on a single channel we all know that there will be a delay in that channel with respect to the other channels. My solution is to nudge that channel to the left in anticipation of the delay. Supposedly, Nuendo and ProTools HD automatically compensate for that delay when an analog insert is used. I have hard time keeping track of which tracks are nudged to the left and which aren't as I am trying out various inserts.
I must be missing something. There has go to be an easier way. I vaguely recall someone mentioning something on a forum about a third party plugin that has the ability to correct for track latency.
I would appreciate comments from anybody using Logic with analog inserts. I am getting frustrated to the point that I am strongly considering picking up PTHD or Nuendo for this very purpose.

midnightsun wrote:
I continue to struggle with Logic Pro to get an efficient work flow when I use analog channel inserts during mixing. If I insert an analog compressor on a single channel we all know that there will be a delay in that channel with respect to the other channels. My solution is to nudge that channel to the left in anticipation of the delay. Supposedly, Nuendo and ProTools HD automatically compensate for that delay when an analog insert is used. I have hard time keeping track of which tracks are nudged to the left and which aren't as I am trying out various inserts.
This is NOT true. I have used both whilst using external compressors / reverbs / et al, and you still have to manually move the processed track afterwards. What I do, is process the track into a new recording, and then line it up. then use the compressor for something else, or remove it from the signal chain.
I must be missing something. There has go to be an easier way. I vaguely recall someone mentioning something on a forum about a third party plugin that has the ability to correct for track latency.
There is, you can use Logic's built in sample delay plug-in on all the OTHER tracks, the ones that are not going to the external device. Do a test where you find out the IO latency for the compressor or device, and set the sample delay accordingly. If your workflow demands it, that's the way to go.
I would appreciate comments from anybody using Logic with analog inserts. I am getting frustrated to the point that I am strongly considering picking up PTHD or Nuendo for this very purpose.
I do use them all the time, I have a bunch of outboard, which I use for tracking and mixing. I also have used PT HD and Nuendo in these very types of situations.
Again, you would be wasting your money. NO DAW can give you automatic delay compensation for UNKNOWN external devices. This cannot be, and this is why:
1. Once a signal has travelled to the physical output of the computer, there is NO WAY the computer can know where it goes, how long it takes to go there and come back. This is analogous to you throwing a rock around a corner, and knowing that it will go all around the building, WITHOUT LOOKING. And also, when a rock comes all the way around the building, it hits you, and you KNOW that's the same rock. This Physically Impossible. If you are skeptical, try it for yourself.
2. Likewise, a computer cannot possibly know that an incoming signal is the one you sent out previously. This is, because a computer cannot THINK. A computer COMPUTES. It does math for us, so we don't have to. We still have to tell the computer what we are inputting, and we also have to know what to do with what it outputs. One day, many years from now, we might have some AI in our computers. Yechhh. I like thinking for myself.
Cheers
Message was spellchecked by: comatose priests on a mission to get caffeine

Similar Messages

  • Using Platinum Voicemaster Pro Vocal Channel Strip with Logic Pro & MBox 3

    Hiya,
    I was wondering if you can help me please.
    I have a small little home studio that I am currently building (just to record vocals mainly to instrumentals as I am singer/songwriter).
    I am currently using Logic Pro 9 and MBOX Mini 3 as my midi interface but my producer who is based overseas told me to get a preamp. Many musicians have suggested I purchase Platinum Voicemaster Pro Vocal Channel Strip. CAN ANY CONFIRM WHETHER THIS WILL WORK WITH LOGIC PRO 9 AND GIVE ANY ADVICE AS TO HOW IS THE BEST WAY TO USE IT WITH LOGIC PRO 9 AND MY MBOX MINI 3?
    THANK YOU SO MUCH FOR YOUR HELP.
    RUSHELLA
    X

    Thank you both for your input. I am back on the case again, this time with a fully functioning FCB1010. Right ou of the box the pedal does successfully send volume and pan with expression pedal a and b respectively.
    What I would next like to accomplish is to have exp. ped. b now control a plug-in parameter instead, the pedal range on the fuzz-wah plug-in of Logic Pro 7 for expample.
    When I use Automation Quick Access to edit the assignment of ped. b as Bryan suggested, Logic appears to be receiving the info from ped. b and creating the new assignment (as indicated in the Controller Assignments window), and yet the actual functionality doesn't change, that is, ped. b continues to control pan.
    Any suggestions?
    Best regards, Dan
    Dual 2 GHz PowerPC G5   Mac OS X (10.4.8)  

  • Analog Source Triggering with more than one channel in channel list

    Hello,
    I am trying to use an analog reference trigger with a channel list that contains more than one entry using a
    M Series 6289. I am aware that this is generally not possible to have more than one channel in the list due to hardware limitations. I was hoping if some sort of workaround exists.
    I am using the NIDAQmx C API to control the card.
    Using a second card that is syncronized via RTSI should
    allow me to use an analog reference trigger to control multiple analog IO channels ... Right ???
    Thanks for any advice!
    Best regards
    Peter

    Hello Peter,
    If you look at the NI-DAQmx Help, Analog Triggering Considerations for E Series, M Series, and S Series Devices section, it says that to pause multiple channels with an Analog trigger, you must wire that signal to APFI0 or APFI1. Therefore, it is possible to perform this operation.
    If you are sharing the AI Sample Clock across RTSI, then you would be able to stop multiple AI channels across multiple devices with the one Analog Reference Trigger.
    I hope this helps,
    Sean C.

  • Problem with Fader Banks and Channel in MCU PRO with Logic Pro X

    I purchased a Mackie Control Universal Pro earlier this week, and I have talked with Mackie support techs twice and they have not been able to help me. My problem is that everything seems to work well with Logic X talking with the MCU with the exeption that the Fader Banks function will not move left to channels 1-8, they are stuck at channel 9-16, and will move to the right on to 17-24 and so on,  but it doesnt move to 1-8 when the left fader bank motor is pressed.  However when you toggle tany channel 1-8 levers on the computer screen, the corresponding lever on the Mackie goes up and down,  but the reverse does not occur. The Mackie folks say this is a problem with Logic Pro X, not the MCU.  Perhaps they are correct,  because I still have Logic Express on my Mac and when I close Logic X and Open Logic Express the fader banks move perfectly from 1-8, 9-16, and so on as do the tracks.   My computer is update with Mavericks. 
    I would appreciate any help! I am not a techie, an old guy who used to record on 4 track computers, and want to get away from a mouse control,  but I'm going to take the Mackie MCU back if I cant get this straight,  I've spent a lot of time on this.  Help!

    thank you Pete in Denver,  I actually made some progress today, in setting up the control surface of the Logic Pro Control Surfaces Support Manual, around page sixteen gave me a partial answer.  I had the Mackie icon first, then the Logic Control,  and it said to drag and drop the preferred icon to the left or first place.  that solved my not being able to access channels 1-8, I was able to press the fader bank left button and - voila!.  so that saved my initial problem,  but I still have some issues in moving faders and banks in existing projects,  some tracks show up lit up in the tan colors others don't,  but that is probably due to the way i would move tracks around once I received tracks on drop box from a friend and created new tracks, and I changed a lot of the order of the tracks.  ANyway.  I did make progress.  Thanks!

  • Connecting a hardware mixer to work with Logic

    Hi,
    I'm really keen on the idea of using an analogue mixer to work in conjunction with Logic. But is it even possible to connect Logic and a Mackie 1642 vlz3 via an iMac?
    Nick

    Yes, it is if you already have a multi-channel interface.
    If you don't, maybe consider Mackie's Onyx series mixers which, with the firewire option, gives you an analog mixer and an interface all in one.

  • Motu 828mk3 With Logic 8

    Hey guys,
    Just upgraded to a Motu Mk3...having issues getting any sound out of Logic (and reason for that matter)
    Its all set up properly and is working fine with Itunes...although once i open up logic...it trys to send the output signal to the analog channels and not master out.
    I have selected all the right things in preferences but it still continues not to work.
    any advice?
    Your help would be greatly appreciated
    Thanks
    Matt

    In Logic you need to set the outputs to Output 9-10. It is strange but it is the way Logic does it.

  • Mainstage (detuning, transpoing in error) when used with Logic 8

    I have been using Logic Pro on stage for many years and have just tried to run mainstage along side Logic in a live scenario. Logic pro runs a track and then mainstage is used to play a selection of patches whilst the track is playing. Both applications work together seamlessly and mainstage easily opens the patches, the problem is mainstage is detuning the chosen patches by a semitone and therefore I have to play a semitone lower in order to play with the backing track and this gets very confusing when jumping between software and hardware sounds!
    When I play with the same midi controller through a channel strip in Logic pro there are no problems, however when i jump to using mainstage there is a problem.
    Has anyone else encountered this? Any fixes?
    Many thanks in advance.
    Cheers,
    T

    I have been using Logic Pro on stage for many years and have just tried to run mainstage along side Logic in a live scenario. Logic pro runs a track and then mainstage is used to play a selection of patches whilst the track is playing. Both applications work together seamlessly and mainstage easily opens the patches, the problem is mainstage is detuning the chosen patches by a semitone and therefore I have to play a semitone lower in order to play with the backing track and this gets very confusing when jumping between software and hardware sounds!
    When I play with the same midi controller through a channel strip in Logic pro there are no problems, however when i jump to using mainstage there is a problem.
    Has anyone else encountered this? Any fixes?
    Many thanks in advance.
    Cheers,
    T

  • I am trying to simulate the robot voice synthesizer sound that is produced by that electronic voice simulator after someone as had their voice box removed.   The vocal transformer insert in Logic Pro doesn't quite do it.   Suggestions?

    I am trying to simulate the robot voice synthesizer sound that is produced by that electronic voice simulator after someone as had their voice box removed.   The vocal transformer insert in Logic Pro doesn't quite do it.   Any Suggestions?

    Try one of the Audio Voice Effects like Alien / Cosmic / Robot… etc. to start with…
    Adjust the Settings in the Inspector to your liking…

  • How can I detect an error on a single FP analog channel?

    Hello! I am new to the world of LabVIEW, maybe someone can help me. I need to detect if ONE of the analog channels in FP-AI-100 is in error state, such as reading out of range. I have no access to working FP modules and have no way of testing my code. Could someone tell me if what I am trying to do is possible? I modified an example Analog Input.vi and wondering if it will work. I changed the input to Read block to read only one channel, not the whole module and examining the error status bit. Will this status bit display error only for selected channel or for the whole module? I need to ignore all other channels.
    Thanks! Ellen.
    Attachments:
    Analog_Input_Error_Test.zip ‏12 KB

    Hi Ellen,
    I do not have LV 7.1 loaded so I can not look at your VI. Please post an image if you want me to look.
    In theory, checking the boolean should work in finding error cluster that have the boolean set.
    THe complication is this.
    I have seen that some of the error codes returned by FP reads will either have or not have their booleans set depending on which version of the FP code you are using.
    I saw in LV 6.1 that an "open RTD" (if memory serves me correctly) would return a true boolean if LV 6.1 was the latest version of LV loaded. After another engineer used LV 6.1 after he had loaded LV 7.0 the error boolean was no longer set!
    THe definition of boolean set or not set from one version to the next!
    So...
    I must advise that you test each
    type of error you want to support in your code with whatever version of code you plan to use to ensure the boolean will be set.
    Trying to help,
    Ben
    Ben Rayner
    I am currently active on.. MainStream Preppers
    Rayner's Ridge is under construction

  • How to use a multiple boards (6321/6323) analogical acquisition task with simultaneous analogical generation task using the same boards (Labwindows CVI10)

    Subject : it seems impossible to run a multiple boards analogical acquisition task with one or several analogical generation task using the same boards.
    NI Configuration : Dev1 = Dev2 = 6321 boards
    Development environnement : LabWindows CVI 10
    Source code for analogical acquisitino task :
           DAQmxCreateTask("",&AIRecordingtaskHandle);
           DAQmxCreateAIVoltageChan(AIRecordingtaskHandle,chan,"",DAQmx_Val_NRSE,min,max,DAQmx_Val_Volts,NULL);
           DAQmxCfgSampClkTiming (AIRecordingtaskHandle, "", rate, DAQmx_Val_Rising, DAQmx_Val_FiniteSamps, sampsPerChan);
           DAQmxGetTaskAttribute(AIRecordingtaskHandle,DAQmx_Task_NumChans,&gNumChannels);
    Chan = "Dev1/ai0, Dev1/ai1, Dev1/ai2, Dev2/ai1"
    Source code for analogical generation taskS :
           DAQmxErrChk (DAQmxCreateTask("",&AOtaskHandle_C1_DAC0));
           DAQmxErrChk (DAQmxCreateAOVoltageChan (AOtaskHandle_C1_DAC0, chan, "", min, max,DAQmx_Val_Volts, ""));  // chan vaut Dev1/ao0
           DAQmxErrChk (DAQmxCreateTask("",&AOtaskHandle_C1_DAC1));
           DAQmxErrChk (DAQmxCreateAOVoltageChan (AOtaskHandle_C1_DAC1, chan, "", min, max,DAQmx_Val_Volts, "")); // chan vaut Dev1/ao1
           DAQmxErrChk (DAQmxCreateTask("",&AOtaskHandle_C2_DAC0));
           DAQmxErrChk (DAQmxCreateAOVoltageChan (AOtaskHandle_C2_DAC0, chan, "", min, max,DAQmx_Val_Volts, "")); // chan vaut Dev2/ao0
    At the first DAQmxReadBinary call attempt, the system shows an error (see attached document) 
    What we understand about that error : it is impossible to run the two set of tasks (ai and ao) using ressources from both Dev1 and Dev2 in the set of tasks because it is not allowed to use the same Reference Clock for that.
    The question is : is there a way to to that without having that kind of message?
    We tried different combinations :
    - Using only one ao task (on Dev1/Dac0) : same error
    - Not using any ao task (only the ai task) : no error
    - configuring the ai task with only channel from Dev1 : no error 
    - Using "/Dev1/ai/SampleClock" as internal clock for the ai task and "/Devk/ao/SampleClock" for each ao task (k standing for "1" or "2" depending of the ao task we consider) : error
    Thanks a lot.
    Pièces jointes :
    MsgErreur NIDAQmx.JPG ‏38 KB

    doublon
    Valentin
    Certified TestStand Architect
    Certified LabVIEW Developer
    National Instruments France
    #adMrkt{text-align: center;font-size:11px; font-weight: bold;} #adMrkt a {text-decoration: none;} #adMrkt a:hover{font-size: 9px;} #adMrkt a span{display: none;} #adMrkt a:hover span{display: block;}
    Travaux Pratiques d'initiation à LabVIEW et à la mesure
    Du 2 au 23 octobre, partout en France

  • Solo Button in Channel Strip with Red Line

    Solo Button in Channel Strip with Red Line through it and it won't solo?
    How'd it happen and how do you get rid of it?
    Thanks!

    Try This----From the Manual
    Logic Pro, Express: Solo Safe mode may not remain disabled for a particular channel strip
    Symptoms
    In certain projects, "Solo Safe" mode for a channel strip may enable each time you load the project, even after you disable it and save the project.
    Resolution
    When a channel strip in Logic is "Solo Safe", it remains audible, even when other channel strips are soloed. Solo Safe is indicated by a diagonal red line through the solo button on a channel strip.
    You can manually toggle the solo safe status of a channel strip by Control-clicking its solo button. There are times when you may find that a particular audio channel strip in a project reverts to solo safe mode when you load the project, even after you manually disable solo safe. Here is why that may happen and steps you can take to prevent it from occurring.
    A Logic project contains a special audio channel strip used for pre-listening to audio in the Sample Edit window, Audio Bin, and Loop Browser. When you create a Logic project from one of the factory templates, this channel strip is assigned to "Audio 256". This channel strip stays in solo safe mode so that you can always preview audio. The image below shows the channel strip for a new, empty project.
    If there is no audio channel strip in a project assigned to "Audio 256", Logic will use the highest-numbered available audio channel for pre-listening. When the project is loaded, that channel strip will be put into solo safe mode. You may find this happens in older projects that you open in Logic 8, or in cases where you have deleted the "Audio 256" channel strip in a Logic 8 project. To prevent this from affecting channel strips you are using in a project's arrangement, follow these steps:
    Choose Window > Environment.
    From the Environment window menu, choose New > Channel Strip > Auxiliary. A channel strip will appear in the environment.
    Select the channel strip. It will highlight.
    In the Device parameter box in the upper left of the Environment window, click the arrows to the right of "Channel" and choose Audio > Audio 256 from the menu.
    Select the text tool, click on the name below the channel strip and name it "Prelisten".

  • Noob needs help with Logic and Motu live setup.

    Hello everyone,
    I'm a noob / semi noob who could use some help with a live setup using 2 MOTU 896HD's and Logic on a Mac.
    Here's the scenario:
    I teach an outdoor marching percussion section (a drumline and a front ensemble of marimbas and vibes). We have an amazing setup of live sound to amplify and enhance the mallet percussion. There is a yamaha PA system with 2 subs and 2 mains which are routed through a rack unit that processes the overall PA balance. I'm pretty sure that the unit is supposed to avoid feedback and do an overall cross-over EQ of the sound. Other then that unit, we have 2 motu896hd units which are routed via fire-wire. I also have a coax cable routing the output of the secondary box to the input of the primary box (digital i/o which converts to ADAT in (i think?)..?
    Here's the confusion:
    There are more then 8 inputs being used from the ensemble itself, so I need the 16 available inputs to be available in Logic. I was lead to believe that the 2nd motu unit would have to be sent digitally to the 1st motu unit via coax digital i/o. Once in Logic, however, I cannot find the signal or any input at all past the 8th input (of the 1st unit).
    Here's the goal:
    All of my performers and inputs routed via firewire into a Mac Mini running OSX and Logic pro.
    I want to be able to use MainStage and run different patches of effects / virt. instruments for a midi controller keyboard / etc.
    I want to be able to EQ and balance the ensemble via Logic.
    Here's another question:
    How much latency will I be dealing with? Would a mac mini with 4gb of ram be able to handle this load? With percussion, I obviously want the sound as latency free as possible. I also, however, want the flexibility of sound enhancement / modification that comes with Logic and the motu896hd units.
    Any help would be REALLY appreciated. I need the routing assistance along with some direction as to whether or not this will work for this type of application. I'm pretty certain it does, as I have spoken with some other teachers in similar venues and they have been doing similar things using mac mini's / logic / mainstage / etc.
    Thanks in advance,
    Chris

    You'll definitely want to read the manual to make sure the 896HDs are connected together properly. ADAT is a little tricky, it's not just a matter of cabling them together. Go to motunation.com if you need more guidance on connecting multiple devices. Beyond that initial hookup, here are a couple of quick suggestions:
    1. Open CueMix and see if both devices are reported there. If not, your connections aren't correct. Be sure to select 44.1kHz as your sample rate, otherwise you are reducing the number of additional channels. For instance at 88.2kHz you would get half the additional channels via ADAT.
    2. You may need to create an aggregate device for the MacBook to recognize more than the first 896HD. Lots of help on this forum for how to do that. Again, first make sure you have the 896HDs connected together properly.
    3. As for latency with Mainstage on the Mini, no way to know until you try it. Generally MOTU is fantastic for low latency work but Mainstage is a question mark for a lot of users right now. If the Mini can't cut the mustard, you have a great excuse to upgrade to a MacBook Pro.

  • Questions about Novation Remote 25SL integration with Logic Pro 8

    Preface: I have to apologize in advance if this seems somewhat confusing. I'm sure some of the terms I'm using are just plain wrong - I'm somewhat of a n00b.
    I have a Novation Remote 25SL configured to use AutoMap with Logic Pro 8 from Novation's website and most things are working well. It's confusing at times because sometimes I find it hard to tell what mode the keyboard is in, but that's ok - it's the least of my worries. Based on what I've seen through reading the manuals and my own experimentation, I have a couple of questions:
    - Despite what the guy at the store told me, I can't seem to figure out how to select different kits from within the SL. For example, if I have a garageband instrument selected on a track - can I use the data/select knob on the SL as it is now, or do I have to program that somewhere, somehow? Or if I have Ultrabeat on a track, can I use the knob to select the different kits/banks?
    - Is there a way to control non-Apple AU plugins like the rest of those which ship with Logic? All the sexy looking ones like Ringshifter, Compressor, Overdrive, etc. It seems odd that Remote will go into Mixer Automap mode and be able to control the certain portions of the instruments, but not the plugins that are automatically loaded into the channel strip when the instrument is loaded.
    - I have a 25 key Remote. In Ultrabeat, I find the key maps miss a chunk of notes between where the drum pads end and where the keyboard starts (or vice-verse). Is there a way to get it so each key has a mapping? 25 keys in Ultrabeat, 25 keys on the board plus 8 drum pads - seems like there's lots of room.
    Thanks in advance for all your feedback.
    Message was edited by: Jason Lixfeld

    Follow-up research:
    Apparently there is a driver conflict between the AlphaTrack and the ReMOTE. So far I have got the ReMOTE working - sort of - in Logic using the following method which was published at Novation's Answerbase:
    1. disconnect the alphatrack.
    2. launch Logic and then turn on the ReMOTE SL.
    3. Go into the Environment window, and add a Monitor Object. Connect it to the Remote SL's ports 2 and 3.
    So far, this seems to at least get MIDI note input into Logic, but the Automap function seems a bit sketchy so far. This will depend on Novation updating Automap and the SL's firmware for Logic 8.
    As noted previously, there doesn't seem to be any AlphaTrack support in Logic 8 yet and it's up to Apple to make it work. They do support their TranzPort product, so with luck there'll be support in the next update.
    I'd really love to use BOTH control surfaces with Logic simultaneously -- the AlphaTrack with the Mixer and plugins, the ReMOTE with Software Instruments. I suppose it might take some interesting mapping but this doesn't seem like that strange a setup -- there are plenty of "mixer surfaces" like the M-Audio one, and the Novation Automap stuff is quite popular....

  • Best structure to measure voltage across 8 resistors in parallel via 8 separate analog channels

    Im setting up a simple circuit w/ 8 resistors in parallel. It will be connected to a PCI 6036E DAQ. I need to measure the voltage across each resistor, take x amount of samples, and then automatically move on to the next resistor and so on and also save the values to a file.  Im going to connect each resistor to a separate analog channel.  I have already setup a vi to read the voltage across one resistor and take X amount of samples, display the waveform, and also save the data to a file.  
    What would the best structure be to run this test?  I am thinking a Sequence structure, but it seems like people tend to avoid using that. Or would a case/while loop be better?
    From my understanding, the data will not pass out of a sequence structure until it is finished. this doesnt seem to be that big of a problem for me, as I only want the data at the end....
    thanks for the help!

    Use a for loop.  Put your code inside the loop, but delete the analog channel number.  Make an array constant and poplulate the array with each analog channel number.  If you wire the array to the loop (left side), you will see the terminal is a hollow box.  This means indexing.  The loop will operate on the first array element, then repeat with the second array element, and so on until all array elements have been processed.  Wire the hollow box to the point in your code where the analog channel number was deleted.  Now the loop will execute the same code using a different channel each time.  If you wire the output to the right edge of the for loop, you will again see the hollow box.  All of your measurements will be contained in an array at that hollow box.  Process the outputs as you like, maybe display the entire array, or index the array to get the individual elements, whatever.  The advantage of the for loop is that you have to write your code only once.  Everything is seen on one screen making it easier to read.  Sequence structures are not good programming practice because a lot of the code is hidden, and you have to go to different sequence frames to see the hidden code.  Also, why duplicate the code in each frame when the loop will do it all.  Good luck.
    - tbob
    Inventor of the WORM Global

  • Crosstalk among Analog channels

    The setup is this :
    1. Card is PCMCIA 6024E.
    2. Software is LV 7.1 and all reads are with DAQMx functions.
    3. 6 analog channels configured in differential mode ( AIN_0 to AIN_5)
    4. Connected to the card via BNC2110 connector.
    If I connect only one channel to a signal, it is reflected in all the other 5 channels at different levels.
    I do know that I can solve this problem by two means :
    A. Ground the unused channels to AIGND.
    B. Use alternate channels with one grounded channel in between two active channels.
    In my case since I need all 6 channels at times, so option B does'nt exist.
    Question is, can something be done in the software without resorting to option A.
    I have attached the snap shot of my problem. The straightline plot is the channel that has a signal on it and the other "followers" are free channels. At 15:49:43 I made the active channel zero and you can see all of them dropping to zero. Then I started another channel and all of them pick up !
    Kindly help solve this.
    Raghunathan
    LV2012 to Automate Hydraulic Test rigs.
    Attachments:
    FuelPump_06-04-05 _PM 03-50-08.jpg ‏86 KB

    SE_Hoard wrote:
    I would be interested in any solutions to your problem also. ... When I input a signal on CH0 it also appears on the other 7 channels. ....
    I was searching the tutorials and application notes on the NI site. Located this PDF which discusses the aspect of amplifier settling times in a multiplexed front end of a multi channel DAQ setup. Just read through the recommendations and see if they can help to reduce crosstalk in your case :
    http://zone.ni.com/devzone%5Cconceptd.nsf/webmain/B9B5D37A04C772B58625686500695C20/$File/AN045.pdf
    Raghunathan
    Raghunathan
    LV2012 to Automate Hydraulic Test rigs.

Maybe you are looking for