Analytics track in Single Folio

Hello:
I did compile an app with single-folio option and I want to track the analytics. I did forgot to include the ID on the Reprt Suite for my application account under the Account Administration portal..
Question 1: Do the single-folio apps allow tracking of the contents of it?
Question 2: Do I have to recompile it so I can track the behavior of the users?
Leo

No...I see nothing when I connect with the account I used to compile it on the VB... I guess I need to compile it again and set a name for it on the account administration section for the Reports, right?

Similar Messages

Omniture Analytics in Single Folio Apps

Hello,
I have a question about the newest release notes for yesterday's producer tools update. There it is noted that Analytics are now available in single folio apps.
But building folios has nothing to do with the producer tools, it is part of the viewer builder, right?
Does that mean v14 (Viewer 1.9.x) viewers already include analytics in single-folio viewers?
or does that come with v15 (viewer 1.10)?
—Johannes

@ Bob, all:
We are submitting a single issue app to Apple this weekend, and I'd love to include this functionality, so I have 2 questions:
Q1 - Is this new viewer builder release you mentioned for this week still on track, so waiting to submit to Apple until the weekend is worthwhile?
Q2 - Other than simply using the new viewer builder, is here anything I need to activate RE Omniture, any data or info I need to submit to our Adobe Solution Provider to set this up?
Many Thanks, Juergen

Is "No Single Folio for iphone" a missed opportunity for designers and Adobe?

We have a client that is interested in a single folio app, and others in our agency that would love to sell clients on publishing their free material to both the ipad and the iphone, but the cost of the downloads is too great a hurdle. I have contacted adobe for custom pricing (please contact a rep if you have questions regarding prices) and the cost is still monumental for publishing to this platform for free applications. If an app from DPS where to become popular it could easily cost as much as doing a native app.
Does anyone else think there needs to be an additional pricing tier for things like free catalogs where we are not able to charge for the app? I love the tool-set and would love to be in the middle of this new push for the tablet but my current project is headed back to the interactive group.

Hey Bob, I enjoy your replies, very helpful.
I guess business ethics should be enough to prevent a company from switching, to a paid version later. The threat of a fine, lawsuite, takedown, or really now days - being called out for cheating another company publicly may be enough of a deterrent. And if that's not enough, I would think there would be a technical mechanisium to either track or prevent that switch.
If they charged the same price as they do now for Pro but with a quarter of the Folios (250), and then there were some higher more exspensive teirs I would think they could make the money on the front end rather than the back end. Clients cant budget for an unknown like downloads but they can budget upfront costs.
The point is, if the solution is more afforadable will it be used more? My clients can't justify the unknown costs, therefore I wont be paying Adobe for their Pro service. Doing some searching of the web brings up similar compiants. This is simply my feedback to try to change the system.
Thanks.

Download fees for a single folio using a professional edition

Hey guys,
we are releasing a free monthly online magazine in the coming month, at first we considered the single edition option because of its 0$ download fees. the down side was that it wouldn’t allow us to be available in the android market or on the IPhone.
my question is, is it true that i will not be charged for downloads if i only have one folio published using a professional account?
(note that we don’t have a problem un-publishing a previous issue to download a new one.)
another question, is DPS available to purchase from the middle east, if not can i use an offshore account to purchase it.
Thanks in advance

HI Bob,
Could you please elaborate on that? From the above, it would read that a professional subscription can publish several single folio apps, without incurring download fees from Adobe. Presumably with the one-off annual fee and, if I understand correctly, without paying multiple Single Edition fees.
Thanks,
Simon.

Why does DW CC 2014.1 Fluid Grid load HTML file that contains Google Analytics Tracking Code script so slowly?

I exclusively work in Fluid Grid since my site is a Responsive Web Design. I'm having trouble with slow load time in DW CC 2014.1, when my file, as they all do of course, has the Google Analytics Tracking Code script.
I'm on a Windows 8.1 using a Dell Precision M3800 Laptop with Memory 16GB (2x8GB) 1600MHz DDR3 . Each of our site's 180 or so web pages, of course, has its Google Analytics Tracking Code script. It is placed, following Google instructions, as the last entry in the <head>. Google Analytics does not instruct to place the script in the JS Folder with an scr to it, but rather in the <head>. It takes up to one and a half or two minutes for DW CC 2014.1 to load the Google Analytics Tracking Code script . That is, the grid does not show in Live View until finally analytics.js shows up in the Document Toolbar. A minute or two can add up when every page you load takes this long. And, making new Fluid Grid pages, as is done, through the Save As command; every new page made you have to deal with the minute or two wait time since all those pages have the Google Analytics Tracking Code script. Therefore, this time component alone, assuming I'm accessing and/or making 20 pages per week (and in our business this is easily the case) the math is that I'm wasting between 17 and 35 hours per year just with DW CC 2014.1 loading the much needed Google Analytics Tracking Code script.
I have loaded HTML files that do not have the Google Analytics Tracking Code script as a test and those files load at the normal quick speed.
Therefore, the new Chromium Embedded Framework browser engine has a serious load problem when it confronts an HTML5 file with a Google Analytics Tracking Code script. Oddly, the prior DW CC 2014 version, with the old browser engine did not have this slow-load problem since I was loading these same files in that DW CC version up until October 8th or so.
I think this new browser engine is a Google platform that apparently has a problem rendering or loading a Google Analytics Tracking Code script. That makes no sense.
Anyone else had this particular slow-load problem with DW CC 2014.1?
Thanks.

Wow. That sure solved the slow-load problem, at least using your suggested snippet in a simple test HTML file.
Per Google's instructions, I pasted the snippet before the closing </head> tag. And, even in that positioning in the file; the file loaded at the speed (about one second) that it did prior to DW 2014.1.
Two questions.
Will this snippet provide the same tracking data as my current GA snippet?
Because my current GA snippet is in about 200 web pages, can I retain the old snippet in most of them and place the new snippet in my approximately 5 main web pages as well as my templates so my new pages, as well as my main pages, have the new snippet. That is, can I have both snippets (i.e. old snippet in earlier pages and new snippet in main pages and new pages to be made going forward) in my website at the same time?
Of course I would not have both the old and new snippet in a web page at the same time.
I greatly appreciate any assistance anyone can provide me on this issue and thank all of you in advance.
I've provided code for both simple test files below.
Code for Asynchronous Syntax of GA script:
<!doctype html>




<html class="">

<head>
<meta charset="utf-8">
<meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1">
<title>Test Asynchronous GA Tracking Code In Head</title>
<link href="css/boilerplate.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css">
<link href="/css/style.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css">


<script src="js/respond.min.js"></script>
<script type="text/javascript">
var _gaq = _gaq || [];
_gaq.push(['_setAccount', 'UA-73425000-1']);
_gaq.push(['_trackPageview']);
(function() {
    var ga = document.createElement('script'); ga.type = 'text/javascript'; ga.async = true;
    ga.src = ('https:' == document.location.protocol ? 'https://ssl' : 'http://www') + '.google-analytics.com/ga.js';
    var s = document.getElementsByTagName('script')[0]; s.parentNode.insertBefore(ga, s);
</script>
</head>
<body>
<div class="gridContainer clearfix">
<div id="div1" class="fluid">
    <div id="test1" class="fluid ">This is the content for Layout Div Tag "test1"</div>
   <div id="test2" class="fluid ">This is the content for Layout Div Tag "test2"</div>
</div>
</body>
</html>
Code for older GA script snippet:
<!doctype html>




<html class="">

<head>
<meta charset="utf-8">
<meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1">
<title>Test GA Tracking Code In Head</title>
<link href="css/boilerplate.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css">
<link href="/css/style.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css">


<script src="js/respond.min.js"></script>
<script>
(function(i,s,o,g,r,a,m){i['GoogleAnalyticsObject']=r;i[r]=i[r]||function(){
(i[r].q=i[r].q||[]).push(arguments)},i[r].l=1*new Date();a=s.createElement(o),
m=s.getElementsByTagName(o)[0];a.async=1;a.src=g;m.parentNode.insertBefore(a,m)
})(window,document,'script','//www.google-analytics.com/analytics.js','ga');
ga('create', 'UA-73425000-1', 'auto');
ga('send', 'pageview');
</script>
</head>
<body>
<div class="gridContainer clearfix">
<div id="div1" class="fluid">
    <div id="test1" class="fluid ">This is the content for Layout Div Tag "test1"</div>
   <div id="test2" class="fluid ">This is the content for Layout Div Tag "test2"</div>
</div>
</body>
</html>

On Firefox 3.6.x on Mac and Windows, Google Analytics tracking code leads to an Error 400 page

Our business sent out an email campaign that has several links containing Google Analytics tracking code in the URL.
In the tracking code, which is automatically generated via the email campaign software, is an em-dash. The URLs works in every browser (Google Chrome, Safari, Windows) and in older versions of FireFox. They do not work in 3.6.x versions of FireFox in both Mac and Windows.
As a result, when customers click on a link in the email, they get a page that says "HTTP Error 400 - request is badly formed" because FireFox interprets the em-dash as garbage.
Once this error occurs none of the pages in the site can be accessed unless a specific cookie is removed.
Seeing how many people do not know how to clear cookies - it is especially cryptic in the Windows version of FF 3.6.10 - what are the chances that there will be a release of Firefox to remedy this problem? And is there anything else that could be done?

Weird. We are having this same problem as well. Ours happens in Chrome as well. What I have figured out is -at least for us - is its somethign to do with the Google Analytics tracking cookie on our site. If I go to cookies and then delete the _umtz cookie, the site will load fine. In the time being I have set "pageTracker._setCampaignTrack(false); " in our tracking code to keep the script from dropping the cookie in users browsers.

Maximum folio-size (single-folio apps)

Hello,
I am searching for the maximum folio-size of single-folio apps.
Can someone help me in this case?
Thank you in advance!
Regards,
Sebastian

I think it's around 2 GB, however it's best if you keep it less than 700-800 MB.

Three questions about a single-folio publication

We are finishing our first publication with DPS.
We have a Adobe DPS Professional Edition, Annual version.
1- I have been planning to launch the App in iPad and Android for free and in three days to put the price at $9,00. Is that possible?
2 - How much time needs Apple to approve our appliction?
3- I have read that you can't publish a single folio app in Android. Why?
What is the option

On android a .apk app is limited to 50 mb. Additional Content up to 4GB can
be loaded by the app on its first start.
This need a change in workflow for the android version on the viewer side.
And it may be political, too.
—Johannes
(mobil gesendet)
Am 17.01.2012 02:32 schrieb "Bob Bringhurst - Adobe" <[email protected]>:
Re: Three questions about a single-folio publication created by Bob
Bringhurst - Adobe <http://forums.adobe.com/people/BobBringhurst-+Adobe>in
Digital Publishing Suite - View the full discussion<http://forums.adobe.com/message/4145193#4145193>

I've a Single Folio app with 1526 articles. Its there a maximum number for articles per Folio?

Helo! I've created a Single Folio app with 1526 articles.
It works in the generic Adobe Content Viewer, but does not work on my custom App.
It shutdowns after splash window.
Could someone help me?
Elismar

Changing settings? What part of setting?
My guess is that if you have so many articles, and each article need some particular files in the .folio file, then the Viewer make a mistake trying load all files in the same moment, causing auto shutdown. And, I'm using the iPad 3 to test it.
So, would be fine if someone could give me numbers about the maximum number of articles suggested to put in a Folio Issue.
And yes, I'm publishing the Bible!
Elismar

Kindle single-folio apps?

Is it still not possible to build single-folio apps for Kindle? (And Android in general?)
I'm assuming that hasn't changed but haven't paid attention. If not possible, is it on the horizon? (Is it a Kindle Store issue, or a viewer builder issue? Assuming the former.)
thanks

You can create an unlimited number of apps with a Pro subscription.

Single Folio App pricing question

I am a CC member/subscriber. I know I can create as many Single Folio apps as I want, but ...
1) Do I still need to pay $395 per app in order to have the apps published to the Apple App Store?
2) Am I able to use my own CC subscription to create Single Folio apps for my clients or must they purchase their own Single Edition plan?

1. As long as you have a full CC account and not a single app the Single Edition apps are included. There's no additional charge from Adobe.
2. Yes, but I would strongly recommend that they have their own Apple developer account.
Bob

Single-folio and Pro subscription

Hello,
Are there any limitations for publishing single-folio apps using Pro subscription? Can I publish unlimited number of single-folio apps then? If no, what could it cost?
Thanks a lot!

You'll have better luck if you post this in the Digital Publishing Suite forum (eMagazines), instead of the Digital Editions (eBooks) forum.

Single-folio apps with Pro subscription

Hello,
Are there any limitations for publishing single-folio apps using Pro subscription? Can I publish unlimited number of single-folio apps then? If no, what could it cost?
Thanks a lot!

You can create an unlimited number of apps with a Pro subscription.

Create single .folio file for desktop viewing

Hi,
I need a bit of help here please. We are currently on issue 2 of our iPad magazine: https://itunes.apple.com/gb/app/absolute-photo-magazine/id719597521?mt=8
We are trying to create a version of our app that Advertisers can view on all platforms (iPad & Desktop). What we have done is created a delegate account and from the folio builder panel, we have shared the specific folio with that delegate and emailed the login credentials to certain advertisers. This allows them to view it using Content viewer on an iPad.
I am also trying to export the .folio file in order to send this out to specific people to view using Content Viewer on desktop (PC & MAC). In the example here http://www.e3zine.com/desktopviewer.html there is a single .folio file but when I use the export function within the Publishing Suite it exports a zip file which contains all articles as individual .folio files. Is there any way of exporting this folio as one single .folio file?
Thanks
Dean

Hi,
Thanks for your response. I will try the solution for windows users. However, for Mac desktop users this is supported by DPS as shown in this example:
http://www.e3zine.com/desktopviewer.html where I was able to download a .folio file and preview it in Content Viewer on my iMac. I have been able to export my published folio from the publishing suite into a zip folder on my desktop which contains a series of .folio files that are all viewable within content viewer for desktop. The question is how to create one single .folio file like in the example rather than a series of .folio files?
Thanks
Dean

Renditions or Single Folio for Native Android?

I am not sure what the best strategy is for native Android folios. Should I build a single folio at 1280x800 or renditions at 1280x800, 1920x1200, and 2560x1600 as described in Digital Publishing Suite Help | Setting up renditions for native Android viewers?
Do I need three sizes of graphics (as describe in the Android developers docs) if I use the renditions?
Thanks,
Joe

It doesn't matter what size graphics you use. We will resample them to 108ppi for the folio size you pick. 1280x800 is a fine size to use for Android.
Neil

Analytics track in Single Folio

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for