Annoying firmware bug .

Say you have one album by an artist, and also a single track not from that album (as I do for several artists). I have the "album" tag for the single tracks left blank. Now put both the album and the single track onto the iPod, and try to find the single track...
The only way to play the single track is from the "songs" list. If you access that artist, the iPod looks to see how many albums you have by that artist - it doesn't look for tracks that have a matching artist tag but a blank album tag. It sees only one album tag against that artist, so it jumps straight to that album, and never lets you see the non-album tracks.
OK, so there is an obvious workaround, by adding a meaningless album tag to the single tracks, but it's a bit of a pain...

another issue I've noticed now, I can't see how the progress is while charging - because the message does not stay on for long, I can't see the message saying "battery full etc" no more
I have to unlock then I'll see the message... what happens if I'm in a hurry... I just want to quickly check the status... not unlocking etc....
Previous fw was perfect..... this fw is..... no comment

Similar Messages

Firmware bugs

Hello!
I found three firmware bugs and already informed the hotline about one of them in january. It is not fixed in firmware 1.1, so I am posting here.
The first, already reported, bug can be seen with German language setting when configuring the alarm clock. The dialog where you can enter the desired alarm time shows am/pm time although the other time options change to 24h display when setting the iPod to German.
The second bug is inside the game Solitair. Very often you can't move a card to the "finished" stack, although it matches perfectly. For example you can move a red four on top of a black five, but not on top of the (matching) red three at the top.
The third bug is inside the game Brick. I noticed sometimes the ball does not get faster over time which makes it very easy to go through all levels. In fact after some time the first level re-appears.
The following facts are annoying, but I don't know if I can call them bugs.
a) My computer very often loses the connection to the iPod while transferring (large) files. I am using opensource software (Linux, gtkpod), so it might be something to preven t users from using non-supported hardware.
The first message indicating the problem is
"Nov 26 13:38:13 carsten-otto usb 1-3: reset high speed USB device using ehci_hcd and address 71" just after the transfer stopped. This message repeats some times and then everything gets messy.
b) Videos stop playing with sound after some time. I did not try with official videos yet, but my self built videos do meet the requirements and should play. After about ten seconds the video stops for about 5 seconds and then starts again, but from now on without sound. Whenever I seek to a new position I can have sound again, but only for another ten seconds.
Please tell me how to solve the problems and/or how to contact Apple so that they can help me.
Thank you,
Carsten Otto

The Video issue I am having, and I believe all people are having with 5th Generation Video IPODS. I've installed probably 8 or 9 programs over the last two days, hoping to find one that doesn't screw up the video/sound after a few minutes.
It's interesting because none of the Video Podcasts seem to have a problem running on it, but some information regarding how this is working for Video Podcasts but nothing else is missing. I would hope a firmware upgrade is in the works to fix this problem, because if not I anticipate a large recall, and I think this would be bad publicity for Apple, at a time when many competitors are biting at the bit to take a share out of the market.

Firmware bug: $CCERT must not be used in Report_Rule

Prolog
"Report Rule" can be configured with URL's used to save phone's current configuration. Starting with 7.5.2b firmware it is possible to configure more than one URL here. The semi-colon has been used as separator. It caused issues because semi-colon can be used in casual URL, so the separator has been changed to space in 7.5.5 (see Bug in Report_Rule parsing (SPA50x, fw 7.5.x) for more)
As of 7.5.7 firmware, the 2048 certificates has been introduced and value of $CCERT variable may contain text "Installed (2048 bits)". It cause other issue related to Report Rule parsing.
Issue & how to repeat
$CCERT can be used on "Report Rule" no longer because of wrong parsing order.
The author of firmware first call variable expansion for complete "Report Rule" string, then split the result by space in attempt to found second URL.
With Report Rule configured to https://test.local/Report.php?Product=$PN&CERT=$CCERT it is parsed to:
first_rule is https://test.local/Cisco/Report.php?Product=SPA508G&CERT=Installed, second_rule is (2048 bits)
It is wrong result. In advance, it reveal the characters inserted into URL by variable expansion are not escaped properly.
How to fix
The order of parsing steps needs to be reversed. Report Rule need to be split into parts first, then variable expansion should be called for both parts independently. Also, strings expanded from variables should be url-encoded properly.
Disclaimer
I will not call SMB support to report this bug to them. Assuming the Cisco is interested to repair firmware bugs a staff member monitoring this forum will create ticked by self. I wish that all relevant information including the depth-in analysis has been disclosed here. I'm ready to provide further details or create test environment if necessary. I'm just not willing to call the Support center as I'm not willing to explain all those complex things described here by phone (and they doesn't accept written reports).
For those non-Cisco-staff users affected by issue - feel free to report the issue to Support center, if you are willing to do it. You are allowed to use information disclosed here, or just refer to this report. I don't care the authorship.

Post Author: CompositeID
CA Forum: .NET
You are not alone on this one, I am having the very same issue as you are and . Everything functioned just fine the last time the application was deployed was deployed and there was nothing changed to any of the reports or code which handles the reports; however, this time I am having the same issue. I added the parameters to the report to check to see if they were actually being recognized by the report and they do show up, but it refuses to filter the records and brings back every record. The report works properly if I run it just directly in Crystal though. I sure hope someone can enlighten us Paul.
Update: Well, I finally figured out what was causing my issue. The issue had to deal with the actual older version of the CrystalReportViewer control and the newer version supplied by the update. I had suspected it was something minor that I had overlooked when doing the update. Hope this gets you going as well. Cheers

Is there ANY way to report firmware bugs to nokia ...

Nokia released firmware 51.018 for E52 6 months ago.This broke N-Gage and games which were paid for can not be activted.The problem is not corrected in later updates.
Firmware v52,v53,v54.Nokia Care centers tell me its Network problem.I have tested 5 E52s and it is a firmware problem.Mailing to ASK nokia does not reult in bug getting known to programmers either.They lecture me about correct settings.
Some body please tell me if there ANY way to report firmware bugs to nokia programmers
Solved!
Go to Solution.

do you think there will be a new firmware update for e52?
E52 - Product code 0585050
UK.
V54.003

E55 Thread for Firmware Bugs

I noticed that there isn't yet a thread in order to report E55 firmware bugs, so I started this
Here the firmware bugs I've found:
- Hidden WLAN: when you search for wireless access points (for example from the main screen) the phone see always one "hidden wlan", that is not there!
- Default phone numbers: when you have more phone numbers for a contact, you can choose one of these as default for messaging or dialing, but even if you do that, E55 keep asking you what number to use every time you make a sms
- Organizer major bug: sometimes (80% of times!) when you edit a memo in Organizer, or when you move it (by changing the start date), you will see that also the end date has changed (adding 1 or more days), even if you didn't touch it! And even if the start and the end date originally matched! So if you had a memo covering one day, now it covers more days, and the end date can't be changed again (you set the correct date, save, and none happens). This make the memos totally unusable!
- Organizer minor bug: when you open Organizer, and then open a memo, you have to select the information that you want to modify (text, date, synch) and click one more time to edit the memo. But: if you select the "date" or the "synch" row, instead of the "text" row, and then click "modify", the memo is open alway with the cursor on the "text" row. So, the capability of selecting others rows, is pretty useless.
I hope some Nokia guy will notice this thread so there informations can be useful for a future firmware release, also because I'm getting crazy with the memos issue!!
Roberto
Moderator note: word 'official' removed from title, as this may mislead users to believe that the information presented comes from or is in some way endorsed by Nokia.
Message Edited by michaels on 05-Oct-2009 10:06 AM
Message Edited by michaels on 05-Oct-2009 03:31 PM
Roberto Dapino
http://www.stormvision.it/blog

hi olandesevolante
about ur first and second issues u face they r not realy bugs, why?
for the first one: i faced that with my E51 in a place i visited before, that hidden WLAN maybe a conflict from another type of waves other than that of wlan using same frequency
and about the second issue: default phone numbers is a feature that only set for making calls but when u make an sms the phone will ask u to choose between numbers present unders the same contact name even if u set a default number, so it is not a bug but that is the normal firmware properties
for the rest of issues , they sound like real bugs
i hope i helped a little and i wish those bugs will be removed in the next firmware
Message Edited by michaels on 05-Oct-2009 03:31 PM
Phones I bought from 1st till now:
3210 / 3310 / 3410 / 6310 / 6600 / 6020 / N72 / E51 / X2-00 / 5310 xpress Music / E90 Communicator
If you like my post or it helped you, Give me Kodo

Firmware bug: CPU1 tried to use APIC500

Every time I want to use the computer (HP Compaq 6005 Pro small form factor) I have to switch it on and then push the reset button after booting up to a black screen.
I once got :
Firmware bug: CPU1 tried to use APIC500 (LVT offset0) for vector 0x400 but the register is already in use for vector 0xf9 on another CPU.
Any ideas?
Is Linux reporting a real firmware fault or is it wrong?

Hello anonio-mouse,
Welcome to the HP Forums, I hope you enjoy your experience! To help you get the most out of the HP Forums I would like to direct your attention to the HP Forums Guide First Time Here? Learn How to Post and More.
I understand you are getting the [Firmware Bug]: cpu 1, try to use APIC500 (LVT offset 0) for vector 0x400, but the register is already in use for vector 0xf9 on another cpu. I have looked on the Ubuntu site and under the Bugs section I found the bug [Firmware Bug]: cpu 1, try to use APIC500 (LVT offset 0) for vector 0x400, but the register is alrea... so it looks to be a geniune error and is being addressed on the Ubuntu site.
I hope I have answered your question to your satisfaction. Thank you for posting on the HP Forums. Enjoy your weekend!
Please click the "Thumbs Up" on the bottom right of this post to say thank you if you appreciate the support I provide!
Also be sure to mark my post as “Accept as Solution" if you feel my post solved your issue, it will help others who face the same challenge find the same solution.
Dunidar
I work on behalf of HP
Find out a bit more about me by checking out my profile!
"Customers don’t expect you to be perfect. They do expect you to fix things when they go wrong." ~ Donald Porter

Firmware bug? No Connect/Disconnect button on "Manual" PPPoE option

Hi,
To the best of my knowledge this is a firmware bug.
There is no Connect/Disconnect option when choosing "Manual" from the PPPoE settings.
There are two related (unanswered) posts:
http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?messageID=8166971&#8166971
http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?messageID=8137893&#8137893
Is there an official way to report such a bug?
Does anybody have another solution?
Thanks,
Omri

I reported the bug and got this response:
This is a follow up to Bug ID# 6286922. After further investigation it has been determined that this is a known issue, which is currently being investigated by engineering. This issue has been filed in our bug database under the original Bug ID# 5847755. The original bug number being used to track this duplicate issue can be found in the State column, in this format: Duplicate/OrigBug#.

Nokia 5320 XM firmware bugs concerning date and al...

Hello!
Although already having twice sent in my Nokia 5320 XpressMusic for repair, I'm still suffering from severe firmware bugs concerning date and alarm of the device. Here some information on when and how the bugs are showing themselves:
Settings: A different weekly alarm is programmed for each day of the week. The phone is being switched off for the night.
The programmed alarm is being run correctly by the phone. The phone is being switched on after having disabled the alarm.
Some time later the date changes to four or five days in the future. Moreover the phone starts to ring for the day the date has changed to. Often it's not ringing at the time that has been programmed for that day, even though pretending to do so.
Example:
9:45 on Sunday: phone is correctly ringing at the programmed time.
10:15 on Sunday: phone is incorrectly ringing again pretending it was Friday 7:50
the clock remains unchanged, however the date has changed automatically for five days
Linked to this error, there seem to exist similar problems with date and snooze-function already mentioned on these forums:
/discussions/board/message?board.id=smartphones&message.id=145323
/discussions/board/message?board.id=smartphones&message.id=144139
/discussions/board/message?board.id=smartphones&message.id=143893
As I mentioned above, I already sent my phone in twice, however I always got it back with the mention: repaired on guarantee. To me, this seems rather disgraceful for Nokia. I sincerely hope, that, if necessary with the pressure of other users being concerned as well, we arrive to get a phone that is really working as one could await it from the leader in mobile phone production!
I hope we will be informed soon about when there will be a firmware update!
Thanks for your replies!
Regards,
Lorenz

Have the same problem, as I already mentioned in my posts too. But unfortunatly no reply from Nokia either. Seems they really don't care about it. It would be at least apropriate, that they at least announce time of new firmware and note if they will fix this problem with it.
But no replay from them I contacted local nokia dealer in Slovenia, but they just say they can not help. And that we must wait for new firmware.
Now I wonder, when it should came out ?! I am sick of this trouble with my phone. and as you said, I am also turning off my phone since I want my battery to last longer. so this bug must be fixed.
Nokia team, anyone?!?!?

6220c firmware bug?

Updated firmware to 5.15 in my 6220 classic yesterday. After some memory card trouble, it now seems to work, with one exception that I have noted. If I do *#0000# and then options/check for updates and select my usual ISP, I get a message saying "system error". Other ways of accessing Internet work fine with this ISP. Could this be a firmware bug?

i have same problem with my 6220c firmware 5.15,and i have reflashed the firmware twice still same problem,i am unable to watch mobile tv on my tv screen via tv out cable,the voice works fine on tv but there is no picture except a key with a slash in blue background on my tv,and its almost a year now since nokia released a new firmware for 6220c generic and other phones like 5800,5530,n79,n97,n96 etc has goten 2 or 3 firmwares each 2009/2010

IPod Firmware bug?

Hi.
I just bought an iPod Nano 2Gb Black about 1 month ago.
But unfortunally it has started to "hang" at the star ratigng system. If i go to that option, i can't make i disappear. :S I keeps showing that screen even though i push the center button.
Is this a Firmware bug, and how do I fix it? It's ******* me off that an only 1 month old iPod already screwed me like that.
//CV-DK

This is a known bug with some iPod models, including yours.
You'll need to update your iPod to the newest firmware using the latest iPod Updater Utility to resolve this problem.
Additionally, since you have a Nano, you may want to post future topics in the Nano forum instead of the 5th Generation iPod forum.

N85 v20 Firmware bug Fix

v20 firmware bug
When i plug it into charger charging start but afterwhile phone just turns off.
And Navi whell is not work in menu
I recive a connection error when i try to call.
When i go to gallery menu my phone automatic back on main menu?
Message Edited by fensms on 16-Jun-2009 10:27 AM

If a hard reset does not solve the issue then you only other option is to send it to a Nokia Care Point. You can find your nearest
Nokia Care Point at:
For UK
http://www.nokia.co.uk/A4228006
For Europe:
http://europe.nokia.com/A4388379
For Asia-Pacific
http://www.nokia-asia.com/A4416070
Elsewhere:
http://www.nokia.com select your country, go to the support section, then select repair.
Message Edited by cjlim on 16-Jun-2009 10:53 AM

Actiontec MI424WR Gen2 router (revision E) firmware bug

I just received a new Actiontec MI424WR Gen2 (revision E) router. It works fine, but I encountered a software bug when editing Parental Controls.
If you remove a website address from a rule, it deletes it from website list, but it also adds it to keyword list. If you save the rule and then try to edit it to remove the keywords, the keywords are not deleted. The firmware version is 20.8.0
If there is newer firmware which addresses it, I cannot find it, as this model router is not listed on the
firmware download page http://www2.verizon.net/micro/fios_router_update/

You were told correctly. Even though the Wireless G does not support the 35/35. Rev. E is is what most everyone is getting. But I have heard of some Rev. F going out at times. I guess it depends on availability, when the Rev. E runs out of production, perhaps when there is no more Rev. E in stock. I know even on a wired connection the Rev. C is prone to locking up when playing multi user games such as X Box. Now if you were having problems with the X Box App for FiOS TV, I would demand a new one. Even Gen 2 Rev. E is better than C. Will not help wireless much. If you have your router plugged into the Rev. C, I would say the Rev. C should go. Option I used. I use the Hawking HWABN1, but there are cheaper ones available.
I would say that Rev C is very old, and you should qualify for a newer version, since it is locking up intermittantly. Rev. C will probably be told to send to the recyle bin.
bbinnard wrote:
Well....mine is a Rev C
Router Status
Firmware Version:
4.0.16.1.56.0.10.14.4
Model Name:
MI424-WR
Hardware Version:
C
and I tried valiently for months to get it replaced with a Rev F (or is it Rev G - I forget) wireless N router. I was even told that I would get a new Wireless N router when I upgraded my service to 35/35 from 15/5. I even had a date/time set for a tech to do the install of the new router.
But in the end Verizon would not do it, and told me that the Wireless N models are only for business accounts and only for the 125/50 service.
As a result of this I bought a separate N router which I have set up as an N access point. This works OK but is an annoying (and costly) alternative to what could have been a clean solution.
I'd rate this level of customer service as poor.

Nokia E71 Firmware Bugs - 210.21.006, 02-03-2009

I've had the phone since it first launch shortly after middle of 2008. Awesome phone! No problems from day 1.
Unfortunately, right after i updated the firmware in March 2009 there just seems to be a list of bugs showing up. Here's my list. Hopefully someone can help or a new firmware will be released as soon as possible, as some of these problems are rather frustrating and down right disturbing. And obviously you can't go back to the previous firmware. Just to be certain, I reinstalled the firmware twice just to make sure it wasn't a 'bodgy first time install' issue.
1. Home Screen Notifications - Not there
Problem: Apart from Calender Events, every day, the following will 'EVENTUALLY' not show itself:- new message, miss-calls, email 1, email 2, voicemail, miss-call. They will not show irregardless of the actual events happening.
How do I solve this?: I have to go back into 'enabled applications' and un-tick the above home screen events/notifications and then, re-tick and then click ok. Only then, will these notifications re-appear. Not really a SOLUTION as it will happen again within the next 24 hours or less. This is SOOO annoying as I rely on the Home screen notifications for an update of what is happening. How does one realize if there was a miss-call or message received if there's no visual notification and the sound is turned off?
2. Auto-retrieval of Email 1 and Email 2 - Disables itself
Problem: I have emails setup so that they check my email 1, every half hour and email 2, every 1 hour. I have no actual issues retrieving the emails automatically. Accesses and downloads nicely using my network. However, EVENTUALLY 2 to 3 days later, the 'AUTOMATIC RETRIEVAL' disables itself. Why does it do this? Never used to.
How do I solve this?: I have to go back into the respective email accounts and their settings, and re-enable it. Again, not really a solution as it will disable itself within a few days.
3. Shortcut Keys on the Home Screen (left and right) - Does not respond.
Problem: Every so often, the left and right shortcut keys won't work. They are there, but if you click on them nothing happens. Example. On my phone I have 'new SMS' (left) and 'search' (right). They will work for 1 or 2 days, maximum. EVENTUALLY, when I click on either of them, nothing will happen. I can see a very quick 'flash' on the screen as if something is about to happen, but..... NOTHING. This happens also when I change the shortcut keys to open up different applications.
How do i solve this?: I have to restart the phone. No other choice. There's no way of going back into the settings and changing the shortcuts to something else and expect the left and right shortcut buttons to function properly. You have to restart the phone! Never used to that either.
Having said all that, the previous FIRMWARE DIDN'T DO ALL THIS. Is anyone else out there experiencing these same problems? This NEW firmware UPDATE, has turned what used to be an AWESOME phone, into something that is a bit of nuisance.
Nokia please save the E71!
My e71 wishlist.
more printer drivers for different brands
fix the purple haze on the pictures
keep group access points as a standard on the e71 as they did in the e61i
AND GET RID OF THESE BUGS!!!!!
Nokia E71-1 (26)
210.21.006
RM-346

Well, I do hope they provide a new firmware soon which will correct many of the current bugs, since I'm sure Nokia are aware that this won't push many to buy THEIR next devices, it will be Blackberry's or HTC, etc.
My E71 came with fw 100.x... and I wish I'd never upgraded to 200.x...
I'd like to think you'd get more out of your device with a fw updgarde but unfortunately you end up with a worse performing phone!

N80 4.0632.0.38 firmware bugs.

Just recently updated my nokia n80 to firmware version 4.0632.0.38 (latest version) (optus - melbourne) and now im having problems with my phone.
One of the following 2 things happen but not at the same time.
Cannot make outgoing calls at all to any type of number.
Can make outgoing calls but cannot put the call on loudspeaker.
I have to turn the phone off take the battery out then turn it back on again and then it lasts about 5min then stuffs up again.
Spoke to nokia support and they said i have to take it to a nokia service centre to get it looked at, which im going to do but as he told me they can't roll firmware back to a previous version i dont know how they're going to fix it.
I've tried everything from setting phone to factory defaults, reinstalling firmware and removing memory card in case there is a conflicting file/app on it.
The operator on the phone said there is a possibility it is a hardware failure but i dont think so as it was working fine previously.
I'm sure it's software related because it has never done this until i updated the firmware.
Just annoying how i upgrade to the latest version to fix bugs and now ive got one of the biggest disadvantages of not being able to make calls at all.
Just wondering if anyone has had the same problem??
Just hope that if this turns out to be a software problem that it can be fixed asap and a new firmware update can be released.

i still believe the software on mine has got to be the problem because nokia have replaced my phone with another N80 and it still does the same thing!!!
i'm trying to tell them to look into it with software developers etc.. but im getting nowhere.
This is a joke.

WRT120N Latest firmware BUG & PATCH

Hello,
I just bought a WRT120N Wireless Access Point. I upgraded its firmware to the latest available (v1.0.04) but there is a BUG in the "Applications & Gaming" section. In particular, in the "Single Port Forwarding": two applications with the same internal port, even with different IP addresses, can be added and the error message is "Port Number is duplicate.".
This behavior is incorrect and can be explained with an example: let us assume we have two web server behind the NAT. Both are listening on the default port 80/tcp and have address 192.168.1.2 and 192.168.1.3. It is possible to forward the data received by the router on port 80/tcp to the web server 192.168.1.2 and the data received by the router on port 8080/tcp to the web server 192.168.1.3. This is allowed because everything is unique: if the router receive a packet on port 80/tcp it have to rewrite the destination IP address and insert 192.168.1.2 while if it receive a packet on port 8080/tcp it have to rewrite the destination IP address and tcp port (192.168.1.3 and 80). It is irrelevant that final port destination is the same. Of course, it is important that the two rules have a different external port: otherwise the router could not distinguish between them but the internal port is irrelevant (as long as two rules are not identical).
The BUG is circumscribed in the JavaScript since I tried to "nop" the wrong check with Firefox/Firebug and the rules are correctly memorized in the configuration and they works without issues.
I Fixed the JavaScript and, in the following, there is the patch. Actually, this patch does not solve another minor BUG: theoretically it is possible to redirect two different external ports to the same couple internal IP/port. The solution is trivial too, but this would require rewrite a larger portion of code, so I decided to not fix this minor BUG because it is less severe and the scenario is less common.
This BUG seems tightly related to http://forums.linksysbycisco.com/linksys/board/message?board.id=Wireless_Routers&message.id=85768&query.id=245618#M85768 but that one is on another router/firmware (that I do not own) so I do not know if this patch apply to that BUG too.
Please let me know if you need further informations
Marco Papa Manzillo
----------- Patch -------------
diff -ur 192.168.167.1 2/index.htm 192.168.167.1/index.htm
--- 192.168.167.1 2/index.htm   2010-01-05 13:39:59.000000000 +0100
+++ 192.168.167.1/index.htm     2010-01-05 14:32:00.000000000 +0100
@@ -535,9 +535,10 @@
var fNameHead = "gport_external";
var fNameTail = "gport_internal";
+var fNameIP   = "private_ip4_";
var applicationName = "application";
var appname = "";
-var i, rs, rs2, j, index, numProtocol, temp;
+var i, rs, rs2, j, index, numProtocol, ipv4_private, temp, temp2;
for (i = 0; i < F.elements.length; i++) {
f = F.elements[i];
@@ -548,11 +549,15 @@
continue;
        }else {
temp = "protocol" + f.name.substring (fNameTail.length, fNameTail.length + 2);
+temp2 = fNameIP + f.name.substring (fNameTail.length, fNameTail.length + 2);
}else {
temp = "protocol" + f.name.substring (fNameHead.length, fNameHead.length + 2);
+temp2 = fNameIP + f.name.substring (fNameHead.length, fNameHead.length + 2);
numProtocol = document.getElementsByName(temp)[0].value;
+ipv4_private = document.getElementsByName(temp2)[0].value;
+
if (f.value.length == 0)continue;
@@ -584,7 +589,7 @@
if(rs2=="1") break;}
-rs = checkDuplication_PortRange3 (F, f, numProtocol, fNameHead, fNameTail, 0, 15);
+rs = checkDuplication_PortRange3 (F, f, numProtocol, ipv4_private, fNameHead, fNameTail, fNameIP, 0, 15);
if (rs == true||rs2 == "1") {
alert (msg_alert_0038);
//f.value = f.defaultValue;
diff -ur 192.168.167.1 2/jslib.js 192.168.167.1/jslib.js
--- 192.168.167.1 2/jslib.js    2010-01-05 13:35:03.000000000 +0100
+++ 192.168.167.1/jslib.js      2010-01-05 15:27:11.000000000 +0100
@@ -549,19 +549,21 @@
        return false;
//rob. 2009.0325 also check protocol type when submit form.
-function checkDuplication_PortRange3 (F, f, numProtocol, fNameHead, fNameTail, startCount, maxItem)
+// Marco Papa Manzillo 2009.0105 also check internal IPv4 for internal port when submit form
+function checkDuplication_PortRange3 (F, f, numProtocol, ipv4_private,fNameHead, fNameTail, fNameIP, startCount, maxItem)
        if (fNameHead.length == 0)      return false;
        if (fNameTail.length == 0)      return false;
        if (f.value.length   == 0)      return false;
        var fPort1 = new Array (null, null, null, null);
-       var tmpName1, tmpName2;
+       var tmpName1, tmpName2, tmpName3;
        var fProtocol = "protocol";
        var tmpProtocol;
-       var a, a2, b1, b2, ck=0,rs;
+       var a, a2, a3, b1, b2, b4, ck=0,rs;
        a= parseInt (f.value);
        a2=parseInt (numProtocol);
+       a3=parseInt (ipv4_private);
        tmpName1 = "";
        if (f.name.substring (0, fNameHead.length) == fNameHead)
@@ -575,19 +577,21 @@
                tmpName1 = fNameHead + i;
                tmpName2 = fNameTail + i;
                tmpProtocol = fProtocol + i;
+               tmpName3 = fNameIP + i;
                if (f.name == tmpName1 || f.name == tmpName2)   continue;
-               rs = DynamicGetField (F, 3, tmpName1, tmpName2, tmpProtocol, "", fPort1);
+               rs = DynamicGetField (F, 4, tmpName1, tmpName2, tmpProtocol, tmpName3, fPort1);
                if (rs == false)        continue;
                b1 = (fPort1[0].value.length == 0) ? 0: parseInt (fPort1[0].value);
                b2 = (fPort1[1].value.length == 0) ? 0: parseInt (fPort1[1].value);
                b3 = (fPort1[2].value.length == 0) ? 0: parseInt (fPort1[2].value);
+               b4 = (fPort1[3].value.length == 0) ? 0: parseInt (fPort1[3].value);
                if (ck==0)//check tail
-                       if (a == b2)
+                       if (a == b2 && a3==b4 ) // Internal IP must be checked only for internal ports.
                                if ((a2 == 99)||(a2 == b3)) return true;

First of all I would suggest you to reset the router for 45 seconds and reconfigure all the settings again as you have upgraded the router's firmware.
What is the IP address you are getting from the modem...?
What happen when you connect the computer directly to the Modem..?
Do not load the backup config file on the router.After resetting the router,reconfigure all the settings again.

Annoying firmware bug .

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for