Any impact on Discoverer user when upgrade o oracle 8 to 10g

Does it has any impact on Discoverer user when database upgrade from 8 to 10g?

No, there is no impact on your users.
Best wishes
Michael

Similar Messages

What's the impact to the users when AD RMS DB goes down

I did a quick test for the impacts to user when AD RMS DB goes down:
if the unread email sent before DB goes down, it is readable
if the unread email sent after DB goes down, it is unreadable
I understood that Exchange pre-licensing won't work when DB goes down, can user connect to RMS directly to grab the license since RMS server is still up?
Jason

Hi Jason -
It's based on deployment experience and documentation. Our team has been involved in any RMS deployment projects and has helped created Microsoft AD RMS trainings. If you are looking for some specific document, I'll point you to this blog post
here:
http://blogs.technet.com/b/rms/archive/2012/04/16/ad-rms-redundancy-and-fault-tolerance-part-1.aspx
Enrique does an excellent job covering the different components in the AD RMS infrastructure, how to make them fault tolerant, and the ramifications of not implementing high availability.
I hope that helps!
Micah LaNasa
Synergy Advisors
synergyadvisors.biz

Allow other users when upgrading from version 8 to 9

When I originally installed Parallels 8 I did not allow access to Windows to other users on my iMac. I am now upgrading to Parallels 9 and want to enable another user on my computer to access my Windows programs. Will I be prompted to allow other users when I install the Parallels 9 upgrade or will I have to go into Parallels 9 later to allow this. If I have to go in later, how do i do it.

You might want to ask in the Parallels forum as to how Parallels 9 works. http://forum.parallels.com/forum.php

Program changes when upgrade to Oracle 10g and Big5 = UTF8

Hi,
Can anybody tell me what I need to change in the Oracle Forms or Excel VBA program when there is upgrade of Oracle database from 8i to 10g and characterset from Big5 to UTF8? Thanks a lot.

Just test -);
About some SQL functions usage, see following section of Globalization Guide.

Any Proactive measures for 10GR2 when upgrading from W2K3 to W2K3 EE

Current environment
SQL> select banner from v$version;
BANNER
Oracle Database 10g Release 10.2.0.2.0 - Production
PL/SQL Release 10.2.0.2.0 - Production
CORE 10.2.0.2.0 Production
TNS for 32-bit Windows: Version 10.2.0.2.0 - Production
NLSRTL Version 10.2.0.2.0 - Production
We are planning an OS upgrade from windows 2003 stand edition to Windows 2003 enterprise edition.
1) From the ORACLE prospective will there be any bottlenecks.
2) Are they any proactive measures i need to take.If so can you provide me link to a doc which might be helpful
Any comments are appreciated.

Both Windows 2003 Standard Edition and Enterprise Edition are certified platforms for Oracle 10g Rel. 2.
I can see you are currently working with patchset 10.2.0.2.0. You didn't mention if you are planning to upgrade to 10.2.0.3.0 but if you are willing to do so, there are several issues reported by the oracle community, I have included verbatim transcripts from the referred sites, just to name a few:
http://www.pythian.com/blogs/356/oracle-10203-patchset-known-issues-and-bugs
Other platforms to watch out with 10.2.0.3 patchset are Windows and Linux 32 bit - Metalink Note 403616.1 “Many Child Cursors create in 10.2.0.3 on Windows and Linux”. This will likely affect applications with heavy usage of bind variables (perhaps, ones with cursor_sharing=force/similar as well) and busy OLTP is a good candidate. See for yourself the note I mentioned above - it describes some symptoms and consequences (latch contention, ORA-4031, ORA-600) pretty well. The good news is that Linux platform has one-off patch available already - patch 5705795.
http://www.pythian.com/blogs/335/oracle-10203-patchset-is-out
Oracle 10.2.0.3 patchset is out
December 5th, 2006 - by Marc Fielding
My colleague Vamsi Chikkam noticed that the Oracle 10.2.0.3 patchset has been released for Linux and Windows 32-bit. The major bugfixes are the same as my original post with a few additions:
* Identical SQL run in different schemas may modify the wrong schema’s tables (bug 5458753)… we have run into this problem at a client site and it’s not pretty. Workarounds include qualifying schema names in SQL and one-off patches for 10.2.0.2. MetaLink note 329673.1 has more details.
* When cursors are being reloaded frequently in the shared pool, PLS-306/ORA-1722/ORA-1858 errors can occur (bug 4752541)
* Under Windows platforms, triggers referencing :NEW/:OLD using NCHAR/NVARCHAR character sets can error out (bug 5388136)
* The same issue as bug 5388136 above also causes compilation errors on 10.2.0.2 databases upgraded from previous releases under Windows(bug 5383828)
http://www.orafaq.com/maillist/oracle-l/2007/03/05/0329.htm
To inform you about important information regarding your software, Oracle is notifying you of an issue discovered in a recent download of a database patch set or bundle. This issue affects the following patch sets and bundles (hereinafter "Patch Set"):
* 10.2.0.3 all ports
* Windows 32 and 64 bit patch bundles: + 9.2.0.7 Bundle 13, 14, 15 + 9.2.0.8 Bundle 2, 3 and 4 + 10.1.0.5 Bundle 9, 10, 11 + 10.2.0.2 Bundle 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 + 10.2.0.3 Bundle 1
Oracle believes that the number of customers with user data that may be affected by this Patch Set is small; however, the information contained in this announcement is intended to help you determine if your data may be affected and what to do if it is. Please read through this message in its entirety to determine if you have the issue and be sure to perform all recommended steps before contacting support. This information should be maintained for your reference as necessary.
Due to 2007 U.S. and Canadian changes to Daylight Saving Time, you may have stored timestamp data in your Oracle database which was not previously within Daylight Saving Time, but is now included (e.g., timestamp data with dates falling between March 11, 2007 and April 1, 2007). Such data must be corrected BEFORE installing a Patch Set into your Oracle Database. The instructions to detect and correct affected data prior to installing Patch Set are documented in MetaLink (for more information, see MetaLink [1]Note ID # 359145.1).
~ Madrid
http://hrivera99.blogspot.com/

Impact on BI system when upgrading form windows NT to Windows 7 ?

HI all ,
very soon , we are upgrading our OS from windows NT to Windows 7 .
what are the precautions we need to take , ?
regards ,
Santhosh
Edited by: santhosh on Sep 9, 2010 12:09 PM

After Upgrade you prepare some test scenarios and execute them in Dev .. below are few checks that you can perform
- Run Process chain for test loads
-Create Infoarea / Info catalog / IO / DSO / Cube / DS flat file / Transformations / MP / Infoset / Write Opt. DSO .. entire flow and load to make sure everything is OK
-Also check the existing flows if they are any Inactive ?
-Execute queries
-Prepare test case for all day to day activities
You can search for check list docs/notes in https://websmp108.sap-ag.de/upgrade
Edited by: Srinivas on Sep 9, 2010 9:51 AM

Error during installation phase when upgrading from oracle 10 to 11g

hi,
We have going to upgrade oracle 10.2.0.4 to 11.2.0.3 in SAP ECC 6.4(DB:oracle, OS:AIX6.1). By mistake I run RUNINSTALLER from wrong path oracle/stage/11203 <dump folder>/database instead of SAP folder.it gives some error message during installation but i continue to installation and installation is completed.
now i worried about error and and wrong path selection, i removed manually new oracle home folder 112_64 and continue to new installation from proper path but now i am getting below error when running RUNINSTALLER from SAP folder
"[INS-10008] Session Initialization failed".and log are as
ERROR) - Oracle Database software installation finished with errors.
. The Oracle executable <OH>/bin/oracle is empty or does not exist.
. Possible cause(s): link error, installation was cancelled or interrupted, or fatal error.
. (INFO) - Fatal error occurred during installation

Hi Pawan
Could you refer the SAP Note for Oracle Installation error
1431796 - Oracle 11.2.0: Troubleshooting the Software Installation
BR
SS

How to not upgrade clusterware 10203 when upgrading another oracle home

Hello,
We have a 4 node rac 10.2.0.3 and 10.2.0.3 clusterware on red hat 4. We want to install a new none-rac home on one of the nodes and patch that new none-rac home to 10.2.0.4. But if we install and patch the new 10.2.0.4, what happen to the clusterware already running on the 4 rac-node? What we want is to avoid upgrading the clusterware 10.2.0.3. We just want to install a new none-rac on one of the nodes and not touch the clusterware that is already running for the rac-node, 10.2.03. My question is, when installing a new separate none-rac oracle home 10.2.0.4 on RAC, does the new none-rac detect the clusterware 10.2.0.3? If so, what to do so the clusterware 10.2.0.3 is untouched when installing a 10.2.0.4 new none-rac oracle home? Thank you.

As long as you choose a different path name for your new 10.2.0.4 oraclehome, there is no problem. ;)
does the new none-rac detect the clusterware 10.2.0.3?Not if it's NON RAC!

Query running for long post upgrade to Oracle 11g from 10g

The below query is running for a very long time post upgrade of database from 10g to 11g.
SELECT default_supplier
FROM (SELECT pv.vendor_name || '-'
               || pvsa.vendor_site_code default_supplier
          FROM mrp_item_sourcing_levels_v mislv,
               mfg_lookups ml1,
               mfg_lookups ml2,
               mfg_lookups ml3,
               mtl_system_items_b msib,
               po_vendors pv,
               po_vendor_sites_all pvsa
         WHERE msib.segment1 = :b1
           AND msib.organization_id = :b2
           AND mislv.inventory_item_id = msib.inventory_item_id
           AND mislv.organization_id = msib.organization_id
           AND ml1.lookup_type = 'MRP_SOURCING_RULE_TYPE'
           AND ml1.lookup_code = mislv.sourcing_rule_type
           AND ml2.lookup_type = 'MRP_ASSIGNMENT_TYPE'
           AND ml2.lookup_code = mislv.assignment_type
           AND pv.vendor_id = mislv.vendor_id
           AND pvsa.vendor_site_id = mislv.vendor_site_id
           AND pvsa.vendor_id = mislv.vendor_id
           AND ml3.lookup_type = 'MRP_SOURCE_TYPE'
           AND ml3.lookup_code = mislv.sourcing_level
           AND mislv.sourcing_level =
                  (SELECT MIN (sourcing_level)
                     FROM mrp_item_sourcing_levels_v
                    WHERE inventory_item_id = msib.inventory_item_id
                      AND organization_id = msib.organization_id)
        UNION
        SELECT ood.organization_code default_supplier
          FROM mrp_item_sourcing_levels_v mislv,
               mfg_lookups ml1,
               mfg_lookups ml2,
               mfg_lookups ml3,
               mtl_system_items_b msib,
               org_organization_definitions ood
         WHERE msib.segment1 = :b1
           AND msib.organization_id = :b2
           AND mislv.inventory_item_id = msib.inventory_item_id
           AND mislv.organization_id = msib.organization_id
           AND ml1.lookup_type = 'MRP_SOURCING_RULE_TYPE'
           AND ml1.lookup_code = mislv.sourcing_rule_type
           AND ml2.lookup_type = 'MRP_ASSIGNMENT_TYPE'
           AND ml2.lookup_code = mislv.assignment_type
           AND ml3.lookup_type = 'MRP_SOURCE_TYPE'
           AND ml3.lookup_code = mislv.sourcing_level
           AND ood.organization_id = mislv.source_organization_id
           AND mislv.sourcing_level =
                  (SELECT MIN (sourcing_level)
                     FROM mrp_item_sourcing_levels_v
                    WHERE inventory_item_id = msib.inventory_item_id
                      AND organization_id = msib.organization_id))
From the trace files, we see that the issue is with the seeded view, mrp_item_sourcing_levels_v.
Need pointers for fixing the performance.

The ETRM says this about the view:
***** Warning: Oracle Internal Use Only *****
Oracle Corporation does not support access to Oracle
applications data using this object, except from standard Oracle Applications programs.
which is a powerful suggestion that you should not be addressing this view directly. Looking at the source code for the view, it has a bunch of UNIONs that may prevent view merging, and all the queries have loads of hints coded within them. So really, there is little you can do about this.
It looks pretty simple to re-write your query to avoid addressing this view, you are using it only to retrieve a couple of columns. If you look at the source code for the view you'll see that you can get them easily without going through the view.
John Watson
Oracle Certified Master DBA

Upgrading from Oracle 9 to 10g - Client ?

Hello,
my company is planning to migrate from Oracle 9 to Oracle 10. Databases will be installed on 2 differnets servers, so cohabitation won't be a problem.
On user's computers, I'm required to install both 9 Client and 10 Client, and to switch from 9 to 1à on a specified date.
- can I already install 10g client now ?
- what are the parameter/manipulations necessary to continue using 9 Client ?
- what are the parameter/manipulations necessary to switch to 10g Client ?
Best regards
J.-D.
N.B :
User's environment :
Windows Server 2000 and 2003 SP2

user11191197 wrote:
Hello,
- can I already install 10g client now ?yes
- what are the parameter/manipulations necessary to continue using 9 Client ?only correct setup of oracle environment on those clients
- what are the parameter/manipulations necessary to switch to 10g Client ?ORACLE_HOME variable
>
Best regardscheers
>
J.-D.
N.B :
User's environment :
Windows Server 2000 and 2003 SP2

Upgrade from Oracle 9i to Oracle 10g - Impact on Business Objects XI 3.0

We are currently using Oracle 9i with Business Object XI 3.0 and we going to upgrade the database from Oracle 9i to Oracle 10g. We have Universe Created in Oracle 9i and we have reports created in the same universe. Will there be any impact to these reports when upgraded to Oracle 10g? We are using Oracle Client to Connect to the Database.

Hi Here is the supported Database versions for BO XI 3.0
Oracle 10g R1 (10.1)
DataDirect ODBC 5.3 (3)
Yes
JDBC Oracle 10.2
Yes
ODBC Oracle 10.2
Yes
OLEDB Oracle 10.2
Yes
Oracle Net Client 10.2
Yes
Oracle 10g R2 (10.2)
DataDirect ODBC 5.3 (3)
Yes
JDBC Oracle 9.2
Yes
ODBC Oracle 9.2
Yes
OLEDB Oracle 9.2
Yes
Oracle Net Client 9.2
Yes
Oracle 9.2
DataDirect ODBC 5.3 (3)
Yes
Just check with the supported database version for oracle using BOE 3.0
Thanks,
Naveen.

What is the impact on database transaction when migrating oracle9i to 11g?

What is the impact in JDBC classes when migration of oracle 9i to 11g is done?
Will there in problem with connection and transactions? Do we have to modify the classes or include new jars ?

dull_duke_java wrote:
What is the impact in JDBC classes when migration of oracle 9i to 11g is done?I would say nothing unless someone did something horribly wrong in the first place. But if such did occur then it would be in the SQL.
Certainly one possibility would be if "select *" was used and there was a presumption of what order columns were returned in regards to that.
Will there in problem with connection and transactions? Meaning what exactly? If you attempt a migration also servicing new requests then any impact depends on how and what the migration does.
Do we have to modify the classes or include new jars ?If you want a new driver then you would need a new jar.

Any tips about free vouchers when Oracle partner?

Hi All
Do someone have any tips about free vouchers when we are oracle partners?
Thanks for sharing it here.

Hub,
All partner discounts are arranged with and provided by the Oracle Partner Network (OPN). For more information on OPN discounts, you can visit http://www.oracle.com/partners/home/help/global/education_learn.html. You can also contact [email protected]
Regards,
Certification Forum Moderator

Upgrade Oracle Developer Suite 10g (9.0.4) to Release 2 (10.1.2) !

Hi,
I'm having some difficulty on upgrade from Oracle Developer Suite 10g (9.0.4) to Release 2 (10.1.2). My application stop to run after upgrade.
Windows registry names change again, some forms services configuration files too, i'm getting crazy.
/forms90 doesnt exist anymore, F90...., etc.....
now names became 'frm' ou 'forms'
I have to change many customization values and paths inside config files.
Is there a good receipt for doing the pos-installation tasks for an upgrade ?
Regards
Nelson

And how to set RHEL 3 to allow install Oracle
Developer Suite 10g (9.0.4.0.0)?Main documentation link:
http://www.oracle.com/technology/documentation/index.html
Under Development Tools, click Oracle Developer Suite Release 10g (9.0.4), then View Library (Documentation Library for Windows, Linux, Solaris, and HP-UX). The Tab Getting Started has Install guides.

Need to upgrade oracle 8 to 10g

Hi,
I want to upgrade my database from version 8 to version 10g.
My question is:
1) Can i upgrade from oracle 8 to 10g directly? OR need to upgrade to 9i before upgrading to 10g.
2) Is DBUA the right tool for the upgradation?
Hoping for a healthy response,
Thank You and Best Regards

Please read
Oracle Database Upgrade Path Reference List [ID 730365.1]
1. Yes you can directly upgrade...
2. DBUA is good but i would recommend you to go for manual upgrade because you will have more understanding what is happening :)
Upgrade Path
8.1.7.X.X TO 10.2.0.4.0
1. Install 10.2.0.1.0 software
2. Install the 10.2.0.4.0 patchset on top of the existing 10.2.0.1.0 ORACLE_HOME
Patchset number is : 6810189
Patch 6810189
The minimum version required to upgrade to 10.2.X.X.X is 8.1.7.4
Note 551141.1 : Database Server Upgrade/Downgrade Compatibility Matrix
If your oracle database is of a lower version than 8.1.7.4.0 , then Upgrade the database to 8.1.7.4.0 first.
3. Upgrade the database to 10.2.0.4.0
Note 419550.1 : Different Upgrade Methods For Upgrading Your Database
Note 316889.1 : Complete checklist for manual upgrades to 10gR2

Any impact on Discoverer user when upgrade o oracle 8 to 10g

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for