Any impact on Informatica by upgrading DB?

Hi,
Our client environment has been set up with the following:
Informatica 6.2.2
Microsoft SQL Server DB 2000
As these versions are pretty old now, they are planning to migrate Informatica 8x and SQL Server 2005. But they plan to upgrade DB first due to some Transactional Application considerations.
My question here is, by upgrading MS SQL Server 2000 to 2005 any changes/dependencies/mapping alignments are required from Informatica standpoint?
Thanks in advance,
Vency

I can as well confirm that we did not have any issue to access and read data which was archived under 4.6c release after we upgraded to ECC6

Similar Messages

Will there be any impact for OSD when upgrading ADK/MDT/R2?

We’re planning to upgrade our production ConfigMgr environment so that we can deploy Server 2012 and Windows 8.1.
Currently we have ConfigMgr 2012 SP1 CU3 with MDT 2012 Update 1 and Windows ADK 8.0. We have one Primary site and several secondaries.
My understanding is that I need to do the following:
Upgrade Windows ADK 8.0 to 8.1 (uninstall 8.0, install 8.1 on our Primary site)
Upgrade MDT 2012 U1 to MDT 2013 on our Primary site
Install ConfigMgr 2012 R2 on our Primary site
My primary concern with this upgrade is that we are in the middle of our Windows XP to 7 migration.
I am using an MDT 2012 U1 integrated deployment task sequence including the MDT 2012 toolkit, settings, USMT, and MDT database.
I am looking for feedback/links/resources/horror stories from others who have already been through this.
I would like to minimize OS deployment downtime and plan accordingly for outages.
Here are some concerns that I have:
Will uninstalling/reinstalling ADK have any effect on my existing production task sequence deployments?
They use a USMT 5 package from ADK 8.0
Will upgrading MDT from 2012 U1 to 2013 have any effect on my existing deployment task sequence toolkit, settings, boot image packages etc…
Are there any “gotchas” with the R2 upgrade that will impact my existing deployment task sequences or any ConfigMgr 2012 components (app deployment, software updates etc...)?
Any advice or links are appreciated. Thanks in advance!
-FP

We were in a similar boat, XP->Win7 migration and needed to do our R2 upgrade. We postponed the upgrade until just a month or two ago, and for good reason.
We found alot of issues with OSD, but have been able to resolve them fairly quickly.
WinPE 4.0 boot images must be rebuilt as WinPE 5.0 (this was expected)
Our WinPE 5.0 boot image could not contact the MP because of our HTTPS MPs in the DMZ. Had to stand up internal HTTPS MPs so boot clients could download Task Sequence policy.
All task sequences had to be recreated (we integrate with MDT and 1E Nomad) (this was also expected)
We are still fighting through our issues, but our biggest one just arose last week. Our OS images need rebuilt. We only have three, but we are going through that process now.
Microsoft has not confirmed the upgrade caused the OS image issues, but they recommend we rebuild to be safe.
The symptoms we saw were IE errors, desktop profile errors, DISM errors loading drivers, and black screen/white cursor hangs during Windows Setup. All issues were intermittent, one machine would build fine, another wouldnt.
I dont know what we messed up or configured that caused all this trouble, but the R2 upgrade was the trigger that caused it all to break.
Personally, I would definitely wait until your Win7 migration is complete, unless you can risk the possibility of having to rebuild everything if things go awry.
Daniel Ratliff | http://www.PotentEngineer.com

Upgrade SAP R/3 system is there any impact in BW3.5 system

Hi,
Client need to upgrade ECC5.0 to Ecc6.0.No changes in BW3.5 side.
Now is there any impact in BW.If impact what are all the impacts of your experiance.This is very urgent Could you please respond immediatly.
How to test the BW system.
Please do the needful for me...
Thanks to all
Vasu

Hi,
I would like to ask you to refer the note mentioned in the below Link;
Re: Hi Gurus..
With rgds,
Anil Kumar Sharma .P

Has firmware upgrade on a machine running 11i has any impact

Hi all,
We have 11i on running on IBM AIX server. And its current firmware level is SF240_338. Two days back we had power problems and the machine fails to boot. So we got IBM support engineer and replacing the whole motherboard and CPU and also upgrading the firmware level to 240_382_382.
I am just worried if it has any impact on the oracle applications. Like will it function properly??.
Is there any link/relations ship between oracle applications and firmware.
Regards
Taher

There should be no effect. If you are upgrading the OS version, you may need to relink binaries as noted in MOS Doc 356878.1 (How to relink an Applications Installation of Release 11i and Release 12)
HTH
Srini

Any impact on Discoverer user when upgrade o oracle 8 to 10g

Does it has any impact on Discoverer user when database upgrade from 8 to 10g?

No, there is no impact on your users.
Best wishes
Michael

What is the impact of R/3 upgradation from 4.7 to ECC 6 on BI

Dear all,
Can any one tell me what will be the impact of R/3 Upgradation on BI... as we are shortly going to upgrade our R/3 from 4.7 to ECC 6.
Do we need to take any precautions in R/3 and aswell as BI
Please give the information...points will be given
Regards
venu

Hi
Please Refer this as this vll give u the Pros and Cons for upgrade.
Refer
http://wiki.ittoolbox.com/index.php/Upgrade_BW_to_Netweaver_2004s_from_v3.0B
This Wiki contains Rob Moore's ( BW Manager, Edwards Limited) teams experiences in upgrading Business Warehouse System from 3.0B to BW 7.0.
Contents
1 Upgrading from BW 3.0B to BW 7.0 (Netweaver 2004s)
2 Introduction
3 Overview & Scope
4 Drivers
5 Environment
6 Resource & Timescales
7 High Level Plan
8 Summary Task List
8.1 #Support Pack Hike
8.2 #Plug-in installation
8.3 #PREPARE process
8.4 #Dbase upgrades
8.5 #System Upgrade
9 Lessons Learnt
10 Issues & Fixes
10.1 Unfixed Issues
10.2 Fixed Issues
11 Regression Testing Process
11.1 Introduction
11.2 Set up
11.3 Actions
11.4 Security
12 Transport Freeze
13 Web Applications
13.1 Dashboards
13.2 Internet Graphics Server (IGS)
14 Detailed Task Lists
14.1 Support Pack Hike (detail)
14.2 Plug-in installation (detail)
14.3 Dbase upgrades (detail)
14.4 PREPARE Process (detail)
14.5 System Upgrade (detail)
Upgrading from BW 3.0B to BW 7.0 (Netweaver 2004s)
Introduction
This Wiki contains my teams experiences in upgrading our Business Warehouse System from 3.0B to BW 7.0.
Hopefully it will be useful to anyone else who's about to embark on this. If there's anything I've missed or got wrong, then please feel free to edit it or contact me and I'll try to explain.
Rob Moore - BW Manager, Edwards Limited.
Overview & Scope
This was to be a technical upgrade of BW only. The new BW 7.0 web functionality & tool suite which requires the Java stack rather than the ABAP stack was out of scope. We had heard that the latter was where most of the problems with the upgrade lay. Our plan is to wait for this part of BW 7.0 to become more stable. Also it has a big front end change and the business didn't have sufficient resource to cope with that much change management.
Drivers
3.0B at the end of its maintenance
Opportunities to do better reporting
Options to utilise BI Accelerator
Environment
Our R/3 system was at 4.6C and was not going to be upgraded. We have APO at version SCM4.0.
Our BW system is approximately 300 GB, with 125 global users. It was at version 3.0B SP 18
We have Development, Acceptance and Production environments.
Resource & Timescales
The Project ran for 3.5 months from Feb to May 2007. We used the following resources. The percentages are the approx. amount of their time spent on the project.
Project Manager * 1 70%
BW technical team * 3 50%
ABAP coder * 1 10%
SAP Systems Development expert * 1 20%
Basis * 1 25%
High Level Plan
These are the basic areas. We planned to complete this process for each environment in turn, learning our lessons at each stage and incorporating into revised plans for the next environment. However we did the Support Packs and Plug-Ins in quick succession on all environments to keep our full transport path open as long as possible.
Upgrade BW to the minimum support pack.
Install R/3 Plug-ins PI 2004.1
Run PREPARE on BW
Dbase upgrades (Database & SAP Kernel upgrade)
System Upgrade
Summary Task List
This list contains all the basic tasks that we performed. A more detailed check list is shown below for each of the headings.
#Support Pack Hike
We moved only to the minimum acceptable SP as this seemed most likely to avoid any problems with the 3.0B system prior to the upgrade.
Apply OSS 780710 & 485741
Run Baseline for Regression tests
Full Backup
Apply SP's (we were at SP18, going to SP20)
SPAU list review
Regression testing
#Plug-in installation
Apply SAP note 684844
Import and patch Basis plugin PI 2004.1
SPAU list review
#PREPARE process
BW Pre-Prepare tasks
BW - Inconsistent Data fix
Run PREPARE
Review of results
Any showstoppers from PREPARE?
#Dbase upgrades
Database Upgrade (FixPak)
SAP Kernel Upgrade
#System Upgrade
Reverse Transport of Queries
Reconnect DAB & SAB to AAE
Run Baseline for Regression tests
Full Backup
Run the Upgrade
SPAU list review
Regression testing
Lessons Learnt
Testing is all! We picked up on a lot of issues, but would have picked up more if we'd had a full copy of our production environment to test over.
Our approach of doing a full upgrade on each environment before moving to the next one paid dividends in giving us experience of issues and timescales.
Write everything down as you go, so that by the time you get to upgrading production you've got a complete list of what to do.
We succeeded because we had people on our team who had enough experience in Basis and BW to be able to troubleshoot issues and not just read the manual.
The SAP upgrade guide is pretty good, if you can understand what they're on about...
Remember the users! The fact that the loads have been successful doesn't count for anything unless the users can see the data in Excel! There's a tendency to get caught up in the technology and forget that it's all just a means to an end.
Issues & Fixes
I've listed the main issues that we encountered. I have not listed the various issues where Transfer rules became Inactive, DataSources needed replication or we had to reinstall some minor Business Content.
Unfixed Issues
We could not fix these issues, seems like SP 13 will help.
Cant delete individual request from ODS
After PREPARE had been run, if we had a load failure and needed to set an ODS request to Red and delete it, we found that we could not. We raised an OSS with SAP but although they tried hard we couldn't get round it. We reset the PREPARE and still the issue persisted. Ultimately we just lived with the problem for a week until we upgraded production.
Error when trying to save query to itself
Any query with a re-usable structure cannot be saved (more thsan once!)
OSS 975510 fixed the issue in Dev and Acc, but NOT in Production! SP 13 may solve this once it's released.
Warning message when running some queries post-upgrade
Time of calculation Before Aggregation is obsolete. Not a big issue so we haven't fixed this one yet!
Process Chain Scheduling Timing error
Process chains get scheduled for the NEXT day sometimes and has to be manually reset.
See OSS 1016317. Implement SP13 to fix this. We will live with it for now .
Fixed Issues
Duplicate Fiscal Period values in Query
If you open up a drop down box ("Select Filter Value") for Fiscal Year/Period to filter your query, you are presented with duplicate entries for Month & Year.
Due to Fiscal Year Period InfoObject taking data from Master Data not InfoProvider. Thus it picks up all available periods not just Z2.
Auto-Emails being delayed
Emails coming from BW from process chains are delayed 2 hours on BW before being released
Due to userids that send these emails (e.g. ALEREMOTE) being registered on a diffferent timeazone (i.e. CET) from the BW system (i.e. GMT)
Pgm_Not_Found short dump
Whenever a query is run via RRMX or RSRT
Call transaction RS_PERS_ACTIVATE to Activate History and Personalisation
Characteristics not found
When running a query the warning message Characteristic does not exist is displayed for the following: 0TCAACTVT, 0TCAIPROV, 0TCAVALID
We activated the three characteristics listed and the warnings stopped. NO need to make them authorisation-relevant at this stage.(also did 0TCAKYFNM)
System generated Z pgms have disappeared
Post-upgrade the system Z-pgms ceased to exist
Discovered in Development so we compared with pre-upgraded Production and then recreated them or copying them from production.
Conversion issues with some Infoobjects
Data fails to Activate in the ODS targets
For the InfoObjects in question, set the flag so as not to convert the Internal values for these infoobjects
InfoObject has Conversion routine that fails, causing load to fail
The routine prefixes numeric PO Numbers with 0s. SD loads were failing as it was not able to convert the numbers. Presumably the cause of the failure was the running of the Pre-Prepare RSMCNVEXIT pgm.
Check the Tick box in the Update rule to do the conversion prior to loading rather than the other way round.
Requests fail to Activate on numeric data
Request loads OK (different from above issue) but fails to Activate
Forced conversion within the update rules using Alpha routine. Deleted Request and reloaded from PSA.
Database views missing after pre-PREPARE work
Views got deleted from database, although not from data dictionary
Recreated the views in the database using SE14.
Workbook role assignations lost
We lost a few thousand workbook assignments when we transported the role they were attached to into Production
The workbooks did not exist in Development, thus they all went AWOL. We wrote an ABAP program to re-assign them in production
Regression Testing Process
Introduction
We were limited to what we could do here. We didn't have a sandbox environment available. Nor did we have the opportunity to have a replica of our production data to test with, due to lack of disk space in Acceptance and lack of sufficient Basis resource.
Set up
We manually replicated our production process chains into test. We didn't have any legacy InfoPackages to worry about. We asked our super-users for a list of their "Top 10" most important queries and did a reverse transport of the queries from Production back into test (as we do not generally have a dev/acc/prodn process for managing queries, and they are mostly created solely in prodn). We made sure every application was represented. In retrospect we should have done some Workbooks as well, although that didn't give us any problems.
Actions
Prior to the various changes we loaded data via the Process chains and ran the example queries to give ourselves a baseline of data to test against. After the change we ran the same queries again and compared the results against the baseline. We tried to keep R/3 test environments as static as possible during this, although it wasn't always the case & we often had to explain away small changes in the results. After upgrading BW Development we connected it to Acceptance R/3, so that we had pre-upgrade (BW Acceptance) and post-upgrade (BW Development) both taking data from the same place so we could compare and contrast results on both BW systems. We did the same thing once BW Acceptance had been upgrading by connecting it (carefully!) to Production R/3. To get round the lack of disk space we tested by Application and deleted the data once that Application had been signed off. Once we got to System test we involved super-users to sign off some of the testing.
Security
We chose to implement the new security schema rather than choosing the option to stick with old. For us, with a relatively small number of users we felt we could get away with this & if it all went wrong, just temporarily give users a higher level role than they needed. Our security roles are not complex: we have end user, power-user and InfoProvider roles for each BW application, together with some common default roles for all. In the event we simply modified the default "Reports" role that all our users are assigned, transported it and it all went smoothly. Apart from the fact that everyone's workbooks are assigned to this role and so we "lost" them all !
Transport Freeze
Once you've upgraded Development you've lost your transport path. We planned around this as best we could and when absolutely necessary, developed directly in Acceptance or Production, applying those changes back to Development once the project was complete. Depending on what other BW projects you have running this may or may not cause you pain!
Web Applications
Dashboards
We had various dashboards designed via Web Application Designer. All these continued to function on the upgraded system. However there were various formatting changes that occurred e.g. Bar graphs were changed to line graphs, text formats on axes changed etc. SAP provides an upgrade path for moving your Web applications by running various functions. However we took the view that we would simply re-format our dashboards manually, as we didn't have very many to do. Plus the external IGS (see below) powered all our environments and needs upgrading separately as part of the SAP method. Thus we couldn't have tested the SAP path in Development without risking Production. Sticking with manual mods was a lower risk approach for us. We did find we had to re-activate some templates from BC to get some of the reports to continue to work.
Internet Graphics Server (IGS)
We had an external IGS server with v3.0B. Post-upgrade the IGS becomes part of the internal architecture of BW and thge external server is redundant. We found no issues with this; after the upgrade BW simply stops using the external IGS and no separate config was needed.
Detailed Task Lists
Support Pack Hike (detail)
Apply OSS 780710 & 485741
Communicate outage to users
Warning msg on screen
Stop the jobs which extract data into delta queues
Clear the delta queues by loading into BW
Check RSA7 in PAE that delta queues are now empty
Run Baseline for Regression tests
Stop Delta queues
Lock Out users
Full Backup
Apply SP's
Upgrade the SAP kernel from 620 to 640
SPAU list review
Apply OSS Notes 768007 & 861890
Unlock Test users (inc. RFC id's on R/3)
Regression testing
Regression sign-off
Remove warning msg
Unlock users
User communication
Plug-in installation (detail)
Communicate outage to users
Warning msg on screen
Apply SAP note 684844
Lock out users
Full Backup
Empty CRM queues
Import and patch Basis plugin PI 2004.1
SPAU list review
Apply OSS 853130
Switch back on flag in TBE11 (app. BC-MID)
Remove warning msg
Unlock users
User communication
Dbase upgrades
Dbase upgrades (detail)
Communicate outage to users
Warning msg on screen
Run Baseline for Regression tests
Stop the Data extract jobs
Full Backup
Lock Out users
Apply FixPak13SAP to DB2 database
Upgrade the SAP kernel from 620 to 640
Apply OSS 725746 - prevents RSRV short dump
Unlock Test users (inc. RFC id's on R/3)
Regression testing
Regression sign-off
Remove warning msg
Unlock users
User communication
PREPARE Process (detail)
Pre-PREPARE Process
RSDG_ODSO_ACTIVATE
Repair Info objects and recreate the views
Communicate outage to users
Warning msg on screen
Run Baseline for Regression tests
Stop the Data extract jobs
Lock Out users
Full Backup
Run RSMDCNVEXIT Using BSSUPPORT ID
If there conversion process runs longer delay the regular backup
Re-run Baselines and sign off
If there conversion process Fails repeat the steps on Sunday after the regular backup
BW work
Back up customer-specific entries in EDIFCT (note 865142)
Activate all ODS objects
Execute report RSUPGRCHECK with flag "ODS objects" (note 861890)
Check Inconsistent InfoObjects - Upgr Guide 4.4; OSS 46272; Convert Data Classes of InfoCubes - Upgr Guide 4.3
Execute report SAP_FACTVIEWS_RECREATE (note 563201)
Make sure Delta queues are empty (RSA7)
Basis Work
Full Backup of BW
Lock users
Unlock id's RFC id's and designated test users
Confirm backup complete OK
Apply OSS 447341 Convert Inconsistent Characteristic Values - Upgr Guide 4.5
Confirm OK to PREPARE
Run PREPARE
Review of results
System Upgrade (detail)
Communicate outage to users
Process errors from PREPARE
Check disk space availability for PAB
Warning msg on screen
Reverse Transport Queries from PAB to SAB & DAB
Change BW to R/3 connection
Get backup put on hold, for Ops to release later
Ensure Saturday night backup is cancelled
Final run of PREPARE
Run Baseline for Regression tests
Clear Delta Queues
Delete Local Transports
Remove process chains from schedule
Lock Out users (with some exceptions)
Confirm to Ops and Angie that we're ready
Full Backup
Incremental backup of Unix files
UPGRADE "START"
Back up kernel
Unpack latest 700 kernel to upgrade directory
Check ids required for upgrade are unlocked
Check no outstanding updates
Turn off DB2 archiving
Open up the client for changes
Stop saposcol, & delete from exe directory
Run the Upgrade
Execute the saproot.sh script
Perform the database-specific actions
Perform follow-up activities for the SAP kernel
Reimport additional programs
Import Support Packages
Call transaction SGEN to generate ABAP loads
Transport Management System (TMS)
Handover to BW Team
SPAU list review
Apply OSS Notes from SPAU
Process Function Module XXL_FULL_API (part of SPAU)
Restore table EDIFCT (if required)
Transport Fixes from our BW Issue list
Convert the chart settings - manually
Perform activities in the Authorization Area
Activate hierarchy versions
Update the where-used list
Execute the conversion program for the product master
Transport New roles to PAB
Unlock selected users
Regression testing
Regression sign-off
Go / No Go decision
Restore if required
Remove warning msg
Tell Ops that the CR is now complete
Lock down PAB
Unlock users
User communication
Perform the follow-up activities for SAP Solution Manager
Reschedule background jobs
Reschedule weekly backup on Ctrl-M
Drinks all round.
Vendors mentioned: dBase
Hope this helps.

Is there any impact on the Oracle server?

Hi all, currently i have an Oracle Application Server and the current version is 9.0.2.0.0. And another server is Oracle database 9i.
Could anyone tell me if there would be any impact on the oracle database server or the application if i want to install the new version (10.1.2.0.2) of Oracle AS? thx a lot.

Actually there could be anything from no impact to a severe impact, depending on what you want to achieve.
If you let your current environment unchanged and do a fresh install of the 10.1.2.0.2 nothing will happen. If you want to upgrade the 902 into 101202 than you should read the very detailled upgrade guide.
Give us some more details and maybe we are able to answer your question.
cu
Andreas

Is any impact on running instance?

Hai,
curently 12.0.4 instance was running on RHEL ES relese 4 ( nanahant 5) 32bit.
know i am planning to upgrade 32 bit to 64 bit. is any impact on running instance if i upgarde o/s 32 bit to 64 bit.
Regards
DBA

Make sure you relink all executable files/programs once you do the upgrade and before starting the services.
Note: 471566.1 - Migrating Oracle E-Business Suite R12 from Linux 32-bit to Linux 64-bit
https://metalink2.oracle.com/metalink/plsql/ml2_documents.showDocument?p_database_id=NOT&p_id=471566.1

Impact of Support Package Upgrade on languages

Dear Experts,
We have our client with SAP CRM enterprise, ISA and MSA implemented in various countries and many languages (HU, PL, CZ, N, GR etc). We would like to know if SP (Support Package) upgrade will have any impact on the languages.
Any pointers or help would be grateful. Since we need this information urgently, any help in this regard would be of great help.
Points will be rewarded for useful answers.
Regards,
Kathir

There will be no impact of SP's on languages. We recently installed a few SP's for our CRM 4.0 system and did not have any impact.

Impact of ECC 6 Upgrade on BI7.0

Hi Experts,
We are on BI 7.0 ( Netweaver 2004S ) and Source system is ECC5 . Our company is in the process of Technical Upgrade from ECC5 to ECC6 with unicode and Ehp4.
Current setup is
BI 7.0 SP 19 Non Unicode Oracle 10g
ECC 5 Non Unicode Oracle 10g
I would like to know the Impact of ECC6 upgrade on my BI system.
1) We have lot of customization in BI extractor .
2) Various Abap routines written for transformation . will there be any change for unicode.
3) Is there any impact on deltas or Do we need to reinitialise the deltas.
Thanks,

Re: ECC upgrade impact on BI
testing in BW for ECC upgrade
Re: ECC upgrade impact on BI
Go through these threads, sure it would help you.

Impacts on ECC6 Functional Upgrade

We have just technical upgraded our SAP ERP 4.6 to ECC6 recently, we're soon going to perform the functional upgrade of the ECC6.
I would like to check if the ECC6 functional upgrade will have any impact to our existing BW 3.5 system?
Please advice, thanks.

i dont think, the new plugins will impact your BI system. if you go for the technical upgrade, this may break your source system connection and that time you have to do source system restrore connection.
Other than that, no major impacts would be happened in the BI system.

Is there a limit on number of object links to DIR, and any impacts of this

Hello All,
Can you please let us know if there is any limit on the No of Object links to be maintained in the Object Link tab of DIR,
Our major Concern comes as there is One DIR logo / symbol, which is maintained in most of the Material Master around 1000s
and also the same DIR is used in all the Service and maintenance Notification as an Attachment, so the list of Object link in DIR Object link tab is going beyond control above 10000s,
i wanted to know if there is any limit on no of Object links to be maintained in DIR object links, and is there any impact on DMS functionality if the list is ever increasing,
( also can i know if there is any workaround that the DIR is only displayed going in to Material master or Notifications but the same is not listed in the DIR object links tab as here it is going on increasing,)
Thanks and kind regards
Kumar S

Hello Christoph and Every one,
Thanks for the responses given, and providing a hint not to have many Object links, as it could be an performance issue going to the DMS DIR Object link TAB,
But in this particular case we are not assigning the Objectlinks going by the DMS Object links TAB, but it is done in other way round, going by the Equipment or Notification Screens,
There are few Health and safety document ( Which is created as a DIR in DMS) which needs to be assigned in Most of the Equipment and the new notifications created, and this document DIR is assigned from the Equipment and notification Screen,
And we may not be interested to go to the DIR to browse and Assign the Object Links, so as we do not frequently go and check the DIR or Use DIR Object link TAB for Object Link assignment will it in any ways cause performance Issue here??
And also as asked earlier can we have a one way attachment like the DIR is Visible in the Equipment or Notification Screen, but the DIR is not adding up the Equipment or Notification details in its Object links TAB, (by development or it is totally illogical to ask for)
Thanks and Kind regards
S Kumar

Is there any impact that apply Oracle CPU on standby and primary DB

We plan to apply Oracle April CPU on standby DB at this weekend. Then apply the same patch on primary DB next weekend. If I apply the patch on standby, then enable redo apply between primary and standby, is there any impact on primary DB. Theoretically, I don't think so. However, both DBs are production. I want to make sure there is no any impact by applying CPU in different time. Otherwise, I have to apply both DBs at the same time. Please advise. Thanks in advance.

853153 wrote:
I hope you read other people's post carefully. Don't pretend yourself is expert so that you can say whatever you want to say. This is the tech forum for Oracle technical people to ask question, seek help and so on. How do you know I didn't review document 278641.1 before I asked my question. Document 278641.1 only provide info on how to apply patch on primary and standby. Didn't say anything about applying the same patch on both DBs with data Guard at the different time. I just want to make sure If I apply patch on both DBs with one week difference, will this affect my primary database? Is there anything wrong here. If you paly in this forum as expert, please help people, not just look down people.
I suggest you review [url http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html]How To Ask Questions The Smart Way.
When you ask for help, state the platform, operating system, Oracle version and patch level, no matter whether it seems important to the question or not. It most often is important. You may not know the difference between Itanium and PA-RISC, but that is important for Oracle and important for someone doing administrative work on an Oracle database to know. You should also learn to search the internet for answers to common questions. Everyone here wants to help, but few want to spoon-feed.
When you have any kind of standby, that constrains what you can do to a primary, if you want the standby to work properly. You need to understand how things get from one to the other, and how to decide when to simply rebuild the standby from scratch - and that decision is based on your configuration and requirements. You don't want to be in some undefined configuration for any period of time.

I'm thinking of using Final Cut Pro to straighten slightly crooked footage and then re-import back to iMovie to complete the video. Does this have any impact on image quality?

I'm thinking of using Final Cut Pro to straighten slightly crooked footage and then re-import back to iMovie to complete the video. Does this have any impact on image quality?

As your rotate the image, you will begin to see black edges. So, as Tom implies, the image must be scaled up to hide those voids. If you shot 4k ad are editing in a HD timeline, no problem, lots of room to spare. If you shot 1080 and are editing in a 1080 timeline, you will run into issues at a certain point. However, if your 1080 project is going to be transcoded to 720 or ye olde DVD you won't notice any deterioration at all.

I want to upgrade the IOS of my Cisco 2821 from Version 12.4(11) to v 15.1 (XB), but I have CCME v 4.2 (0), is there any problem if I only upgrade the IOS and leave the CCME as it ?

I want to upgrade the IOS of my Cisco 2821 from Version 12.4(11) to v 15.1 (XB), but I have CCME v 4.2 (0), is there any problem if I only upgrade the IOS and leave the CCME as it ?
Thanks

CME is part of the IOS, so you can't upgrade the IOS seperately from CME.
That said, if this is a production environment you should proceed with caution and be prepared to roll back as you may find bugs, etc.
You should also look at release notes and make sure your phone firmware will still work or needs to be upgraded too.
Brandon

Any impact on Informatica by upgrading DB?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for