Any known issues upgrading a Mac from 10.6.8 to 10.8.x

I am using Creative Cloud on my Mac running 10.6.8 and there have not been any real problems except it is running a bit slower. I am considering upgrading my Mac to the latest OS X 10.8.1 and wonder if anyone using Creative Cloud has upgraded or is using it on 10.8.1? Are there any known issues, or could you just give a bit of feedback. Thanks, Jay

All Cloud apps run just fine here on OSX 10.8.1 (upgraded from Lion to Mountain Lion) on MacBook Air.

Similar Messages

  • Are there any known issues upgrading to 10.8.3 from 10.7.5 with Parallels Desktop already installed in 10.7.5?

    Are there any known issues upgrading to 10.8.3 from 10.7.5 with Parallels Desktop already installed in 10.7.5?

    Welcome to Apple Support Communities
    Most of the applications compatible with Lion are also compatible with Mountain Lion, so you shouldn't have any problem. Mountain Lion supports the latest update for Parallels 7 and 8, so if you haven't got one of these versions, you should upgrade it before upgrading Mac OS X. That application uses extensions, so it may cause kernel panics

  • Known Issues Upgrading from Apex 3.0.1 to 3.1.1

    Hi,
    We are in the process of upgrading to 3.1.1 from 3.0.1, are there any known issues (critical) that people can share?
    Have heard that there might be an issue with the Shuttle item - is this correct?
    Thanks.
    Tony.

    Hello,
    >> Have heard that there might be an issue with the Shuttle item - is this correct?
    I’m not aware of any critical issues with the shuttle item, or any other items, for that matter, regarding upgrade to 3.1.1. However …
    Version 3.1 introduced extensive use with the ‘FIELDSET’ tag, in all the compound items, like data picker, checkboxes, shuttle etc. This use might cause some layout problems, or the need to adjust some JavaScript code, but nothing that can’t be overcome. You can read the following for some more details:
    FIELDSET – new layout behavior in 3.1.1
    3.1 upgrade problem:  Post Element Text does not align properly
    Other than that, and as far as my own experience goes, it’s a smooth upgrade.
    Regards,
    Arie.

  • Are there any known issues with Adobe Edge Animate and Yosemite? Experiencing performance issues since upgrading OS

    Are there any known issues with Adobe Edge Animate and Yosemite? Experiencing performance issues since upgrading OS. Animation I was working on that had been performing in browser fine suddenly stopped working, and was not related to any action I had done at that point. Also was working in it today and program stopped responding to key board short cut commands.

    I am having a whole slew of odd interface problems with a fresh 2014.1.1 on a fresh macbook pro with latest Yosemite. Program locks up, cursor selections don't show, things disappear. I have a mac mini also and the program runs fine on it. Is there possibly something related to the solid state hard drive in new macs?

  • Are there any known issues running MAC OS X 10.8.5 on my IMAC and MAC OS X 10.6.8 on my MAC Server?

    Are there any known issues running MAC OS X 10.8.5 on my IMAC and MAC OS X 10.6.8 on my MAC Server?

    To answer the obvious question. No. None that I've seen. But it may depend on what you mean exactly?
    Connecting to file sharing service - None that I've seen
    Connecting to Open Directory (assuming proper configuration) - None that I've seen
    Using the Server's Mail Service (assuming proper configuration) - None that I've seen
    I can say the same about anything else the Server may or may not be offering.

  • Any issues upgrading to Maverick from OS 10.6.8 on a MacBook?

    Any issues upgrading to Maverick from OS 10.6.8 on a MacBook?

    Model Name:          MacBook
      Model Identifier:          MacBook5,1
      Processor Name:          Intel Core 2 Duo
      Processor Speed:          2 GHz

  • I have a mac book pro mid 2011 and it overheats is there any known issue with this model

    overheating issues
    I have a mac book pro mid 2011 and it overheats is there any known issue with this model

    Are you gaming or watching videos when the unit heats up? As your core temperatures rise, it's normal for the fans to speed up - but if you're not running any CPU/GPU intensive apps, it's not normal for your MBP to heat up or for the fans to run high. Download the free iStat Pro widget and either record or take a screen shot of your temps and fans speeds. Oh, and your MBP should not heat up just because you're using the power adapter.
    Clinton

  • Are there any known issues when using PSE 13 after installing Apple's recent 10.10.3 Combo update for Yosemite?

    I've had Yosemite for some time and bought/installed PSE 13 afterwards.
    In the last few days I upgraded to Yosemite 10.10.3.
    As a PSE 13 novice I've been working my way through "Adobe Photoshop Elements 13 - Classroom in a Book". Working through the exercises I've found my iMac is sometimes taking longer to process the functions I'm using than prior ro the 10.10.3 upgrade. E.g., using the Healing Brush tools, Straighten Tool etc.
    I've struggled with Apple's upgrade and had to re-install my machine from a previous Time Machine Backup and so I was wondering:-
    Are there any known issues with PSE 13 post 10.10.3 upgrade?
    Are there things I should be concerned about in the future before accepting an OS X upgrade?
    Thanks,
    Andy

    No, no known issues. However it's a good idea to always delete preferences after OS X system updates.

  • HT5521 I have a lightning to usb cable which is 2m in length.  Is there any known issues with trying to recharge an iPad 4 with this longer length.  It seems to me it is taking much longer than a 1m cord to recharge.

    I have a lightning to usb cable which is 2m in length.  Is there any known issues with trying to recharge an iPad 4 with this longer length?  It seems to me it is taking much longer than a 1m cord to recharge.

    Axel,
    I'm afraid a new SSD won't be different from your bad USB stick. I had similar issues over USB with both a (no-brand) stick and TWO 64gb Kingston SSDNow's (running Kubuntu 12.04 with Kernel 3.11, ia_64): it all runs exceptionally well (wanna know how it feels like booting in 5 sec?) for a few days - then suddenly you find yourself facing that dreaded (initramfs) prompt. You ask yourself: why? Did I upgrade grub lately? Did I upgrade the Kernel? I don't recall so. Ok, let's fix this... insert favorite live cd, boot, fsck...what???? THOUSANDS of errors??? Hundreds of files and directories corrupted, and the system is unusable - Reinstall everything from scratch onto another drive.
    Rinse and repeat: did this 3 times. Then I found this analysis:
    http://lkcl.net/reports/ssd_analysis.html
    I also suspect USB power interrupts more abruptly than SATA power, at shutdown - basically aggravating any power interruption damages. So now I'm going to:
    - buy an Intel S3500!
    - add commit=1 to my mount options in /etc/fstab
    - edit shutdown procedure to add a 5-10 sec pause after unmounting drives.
    Just my two cents.
    Andrea
    Last edited by andreius (2013-12-29 16:51:04)

  • I upgraded my Mac from OSX 10.5.8 to Snow Leopard and then to Mountain Lion 10.8.2.  I did have Microsoft Office for Mac 2004 in my applications and now get a message "can't open Office because Power PC applications are no longer supported."

    I just upgraded my MAC from OSX 10.5.8 to Snow Leopard and then to Mountain Lion 10.8.2.  When I try to access my Microsoft Office for MAC (2004 edition) files I am getting a message "can't open Office because Power PC applications are no longer supported.  How can I access all of my save Word documents?  I just want to be able to retrieve all of my documents that were in Microsoft Office for Mac (2004).  If I purchase the newest version of MS office for Mac from Apple will I be able to retrieve my old documents?

    Use any number of free alternatives to your nearly decade old version of MS Office.
    Consider
    LibreOffice (donation-supported)
    NeoOffice (free)
    OpenOffice (free)
    In addition to the above I also recommend Apple's Pages ($19.99). I use OpenOffice and Pages and have been completely Microsoft - free for years. Life is better without Microsoft.

  • What do I have to purchase to upgrade my Mac from 10.4.11 to a 10.5.8 or later?

    What do I have to purchase to upgrade my Mac from 10.4.11 to a 10.5.8 or later?

    Leopard System requirements
    You must have a Macintosh computer with:
    an Intel processor or a PowerPC G4 (867 MHz or faster) or G5 processor
    a DVD drive >built-in FireWire
    at least 512 MB of RAM (additional RAM is recommended for development purposes)
    a built-in display or a display connected to an Apple-supplied video card supported by your computer
    at least 9 GB of disk space available, or 12 GB of disk space if you install the developer tools
    Snow Leopard General requirements
    Mac computer with an Intel processor
    1GB of memory
    5GB of available disk space
    DVD drive for installation
    Some features require a compatible Internet service provider; fees may apply.
    Some features require Apple’s MobileMe service; fees and terms apply.
    Lion System Requirements
    Mac computer with an Intel Core 2 Duo, Core i3, Core i5, Core i7, or Xeon processor
    2GB of memory
    OS X v10.6.6 or later (v10.6.8 recommended)
    7GB of available space
    Some features require an Apple ID; terms apply.
    You can upgrade directly to Snow Leopard if your hardware supports it without first installing Leopard. Leopard is no longer available but you can order a copy via Apple Care if they are still available - $129.00. Otherwise, you need to find a third-party vendor such as eBay or Amazon.com.
    The price for Snow Leopard is $29.00. It's available from any Apple retailer or the Online Store.

  • Any known issue about running Swing application in WTS?

    *{color:#0000ff}Is there any known issue about running Swing Application in Windows Terminal Server?{color}*
    It is started using JWS from internet (I mean, it checks if there is an avaiable update and updates or just fun).
    _*{color:#800000}+The problem is that just one machine can open the application at the same time+*_
    _*{color}*_
    *{color:#666699}Is there any config in java or jws to run properly several instances of the application (terminal clients)?{color}*
    Edited by: Franzisk on Sep 24, 2007 6:16 PM

    876587 wrote:
    ... and that cause the other threads cannot access the JNI. The same application works fine on other Solaris 10 machines.
    Different environments mean just that. So something could be causing it outside java.
    Additionally if anything at all is different in the execution data, such as even a name having a different size, then it would change the execution path.
    Which would cause a problem in the JNI code to manifest itself on only one box. Probably isn't a pointer bug but all sorts of odd behavior can result from that.

  • Migrate SQL Server 7.0 to Oracle 8i - Any known issues??

    Hi,
    I am in the process of migrating SQL Server database to Oracle 8i for testing purpose. When I do migrate SQL Server database to Oracle 8i, am I doing any harm to the exiting SQL Server database? Would the users be able to use SQL Server database as usual?? Are there any known issues in this regard?
    Please reply.
    Thanks.
    Ramesh

    The Migration Workbench copys the information it requires from the source database and stores it in the Migration Workbench Repository, which is separate from the Source database. So, to answer your question, yes, the users can continue to use the SQL Server database. The data move may cause some system performance degradation. It may also be an idea to replicate the SQL Server database, in case any complication should arise.
    Hope this helps
    Dan

  • Is there any known issue about mutex lock used in JNI on Solaris 10?

    Dear Oracle,
    I'm facing a strange behavior when running a JNI application that use the mutex lock. The application hanged after running for a while on one of our Solaris 10 machines. After investigating the stack trace of the application, it shows that one of all the application's threads that access the JNI hold the mutex lock forever, and that cause the other threads cannot access the JNI. The same application works fine on other Solaris 10 machines.
    The mutex function I used as show below:
    mutex_lock(&mutex)
    The application hanged at this line:
    0xff2cc940 ___lwp_mutex_timedlock + 0x8
    The Kernel version is SunOS 5.10 Generic_142900-14
    Since this issue occurrs on only one Solaris 10 machine in our environment, we are wondering if there is any known issue regarding the mutex lock used in JNI on Solaris 10. We tried to search the Internet and the Java Bug database but found nothing related to this issue.
    Best regards,
    Krit K.

    876587 wrote:
    ... and that cause the other threads cannot access the JNI. The same application works fine on other Solaris 10 machines.
    Different environments mean just that. So something could be causing it outside java.
    Additionally if anything at all is different in the execution data, such as even a name having a different size, then it would change the execution path.
    Which would cause a problem in the JNI code to manifest itself on only one box. Probably isn't a pointer bug but all sorts of odd behavior can result from that.

  • Migrating SQL Server database to Oracle 8i - any known issues

    Hi,
    I am in the process of migrating SQL Server database to Oracle 8i for testing purpose.
    When I do migrate SQL Server database to Oracle 8i, am I doing any harm to the exiting
    SQL Server database? Would the users be able to use SQL Server database as usual?? Are
    there any known issues in this regard?
    Please reply.
    Thanks.
    Ramesh

    Hi,
    I am in the process of migrating SQL Server database to Oracle 8i for testing purpose.
    When I do migrate SQL Server database to Oracle 8i, am I doing any harm to the exiting
    SQL Server database? Would the users be able to use SQL Server database as usual?? Are
    there any known issues in this regard?
    Please reply.
    Thanks.
    Ramesh Hi Ramesh!
    The Migration Workbench does not make any modifications to the SQL Server database. It only reads information from it. Your users should be able to use the SQL Server database as usual.
    Please note however that if you migrate the data over to Oracle using the Migration Workbench and your users continue to enter/update data in the exiting SQL Server database then you may need to move all that data over again in order to have the most up to date data in the Oracle database.
    thanks
    - Garry

Maybe you are looking for