Any known 'porting' issues between 8.2.2 and 9.0 ??

Hi all,
we are in the process of evaluating LS ES2 (9.0) and would like to know if there are any 'porting' issues between the two versions. Asked another way, are there any issues in deploying a 8.2.2. LCA onto 9.0 ?
Dan

8.2 LCA's will run fine in 9.0 if they are just deployed into it. But in 9.0 a new application model has been introduced, so in order to make changes to anything after you've migrated it you'll need to create an application and migrate your processes and resources into it. You may want to take a look at the Leveraging Legacy Solution document available online. Here's the link: http://help.adobe.com/en_US/livecycle/9.0/workbenchHelp/help.htm?content=leveragingLegacy. html .
Chris

Similar Messages

Any known compatible issues between Illustrator CS6 & Photoshop CS2?

Any known compatible issues between Illustrator CS6 & Photoshop CS2?? thanks alot.

What exactly do you want to do with both the apps?
Since the exchange of files from AI to PS is based on PDF, I wouldn't expect problems. The only question is, if Photoshop CS2 will be able to read PDF 1.5, since that's the format AI CS6 embeds in its files. If it doesn't work, you could still save a PDF from AI and make it any other PDF version.
Illustrator can read lower version PSD.
Copy-Paste might be a problem. I can't experiment, since I don't have that PS version any more.

Any known compatibility issues with disabling onboard sound and using

I have the K7 N2 board and disabled on board sound in the bios to use my Turtle Beach Santa Cruz. Sound seems to work fine in Windows Xp and the few games I have installed so far. My problem is with UT2003. When I try to launch the game I get the splash screen then it simply goes away. When I checked the system folder and looked at the debug log it shows the following.
Exception code: c0000005
Exception address: 77f51f2c 0001:00000f2c C:WINDOWSSystem32
tdll.dll
Call stack:
   77f51f2c 0001:00000f2c C:WINDOWSSystem32
tdll.dll
   77f5268e 0001:0000168e C:WINDOWSSystem32
tdll.dll
   77f52631 0001:00001631 C:WINDOWSSystem32
tdll.dll
   7639131d 0001:0000031d C:WINDOWSSystem32IMM32.dll
   77f5e52d 0001:0000d52d C:WINDOWSSystem32
tdll.dll
   77e798cc 0001:000188cc C:WINDOWSsystem32kernel32.dll
   77e7990f 0001:0001890f C:WINDOWSsystem32kernel32.dll
   7c00442a 0001:0000342a C:Program FilesUnreal Tournament 2003SystemMSVCR70.dll
   77e814c7 0001:000204c7 C:WINDOWSsystem32kernel32.dll
I am able to run UT in safe mode without sound. I yanked my Santa Cruz card and uninstalled the drivers and tried with on board but still had the same problem. Since disabling the sound allows me to play, it has to do something with either the on board or my card or some sort of incompatibility between the two. Anyone know of any issues? On a side note. If I was to wipe my drive and use the on board is the quality of the sound as good as using a separate card? Any help would be appreciated.

Just a follow up...I figured I could spend countless hours trying to figure out why UT wouldn'l load or spend 3 hours wiping the disk and reinstalling software. The latter proved to be worth it. My preference would have been not to install any of the audio drivers at all, but since they are bundled with the system drivers there is really no choice. The one thing I did differently was not to install the live drivers from the disk that came with my board but rather update to the newer Nforce 2 system driver dated 2/25/2003.
So the install went Xp Pro, Sp1, Video drivers, newest system drivers, disable on board sound in bios, Santa Cruz drivers then UT2003 and the game loads fine. I still get the message about the game port not having enough resources but that can be ironed out.
Hopefully this information can help someone else out who might experience conflicts going forward.
A side note..I find that with two network cards (3Com and on board) that Xp will spend about three mintues after it loads non responsive as it looks for the other network connection. Running the network wizard on box 1 connected to the internet and creating the network disk and running it on the other machine allowing the on board card to see the network and eliminates the painful lull after Xp load to the time I can do anything.
Thanks for the timely responses. I'm really enjoying this board. So many options, so little time.

Hi Are there any known compatibility issues with Lopic Pro 9 and Adobe PDF 9?

Hi I am am Using a MacPro OS 10.5.8 2x2.66 GHz Dual-Core Intel Xeon and Logic 9.1.5. Also Adobe PDF 9.0
I can't print my score to pdf. The print box openes but The print button and the preview butten are not responsive!
Is any body else experiencing the same issue?
T.

Only Logic Pro 9.1.8 is officially supported under Mavericks. So: update!

Any known compatibility issues with Norton Antivirus for Mac v.11

I sometimes work freelance for a company that requires freelancers to have an antivirus program on their computers regardless if they are macs.
Anybody know if there are any known compatibility issues with mac Norton Antivirus v.11 and snow leopard?
thanks

Big time. Do not, do not install anything Norton. Your system will be mucked. Comply with the company request and use ClamXav.
http://www.macupdate.com/app/mac/15850/clamxav

Any known CBO issues in 9.2.0.8?

Hi, we have a job that runs considerably slower on 9.2.0.8 than it does on 9.2.0.5 and 10G R2. For many SQL statements it chooses a different execution plan than in the other versions and almost always a much slower one.
Are there any known issues with the CBO in 9.2.0.8.?
Rene

Known does not mean known to Oracle at the time of release. It is a reference to the knowledge contained in the minds of people reading this forum. I'm asking for similar experiences with the 9.2.0.8 CBO (in that it acts different from the 9.2.0.5 CBO) and what to do with it.
Rene

Work around technique for imcompatibility issues between Firefox 6.0 and Avast Free Antivirus 6.0, esp "Unresponsive Scripts."

I am using Firefox 6.0, Avast Free Anti-Virus 6.0 and Windows XP.
I am experiencing slow/freezing web browsing after a recent upgrade to Firefox 6.0. Not all but on most occasions, I also get a warning from Avast of an "unresponsive script." I suspect there is a compatibility issue between these versions of Firefox and Avast--are they any short and/or long term solutions to this. I suppose I can disable the Script Blocker on Avast but that would defeat the purpose of having an anti-virus program.
Many thanks in advance.

I have had a similar problem with my system. I just recently (within a week of this post) built a brand new desktop. I installed Windows 7 64-bit Home and had a clean install, no problems. Using IE downloaded an anti-virus program, and then, because it was the latest version, downloaded and installed Firefox 4.0. As I began to search the internet for other programs to install after about maybe 10-15 minutes my computer crashes. Blank screen (yet monitor was still receiving a signal from computer) and completely frozen (couldn't even change the caps and num lock on keyboard). I thought I perhaps forgot to reboot after an update so I did a manual reboot and it started up fine.
When ever I got on the internet (still using firefox) it would crash after anywhere between 5-15 minutes. Since I've had good experience with FF in the past I thought it must be either the drivers or a hardware problem. So in-between crashes I updated all the drivers. Still had the same problem. Took the computer to a friend who knows more about computers than I do, made sure all the drivers were updated, same problem. We thought that it might be a hardware problem (bad video card, chipset, overheating issues, etc.), but after my friend played around with my computer for a day he found that when he didn't start FF at all it worked fine, even after watching a movie, or going through a playlist on Youtube.
At the time of this posting I'm going to try to uninstall FF 4.0 and download and install FF 3.6.16 which is currently on my laptop and works like a dream. Hopefully that will do the trick, because I love using FF and would hate to have to switch to another browser. Hopefully Mozilla will work out the kinks with FF 4 so I can continue to use it.
I apologize for the lengthy post. Any feedback would be appreciated, but is not necessary. I will try and post back after I try FF 3.16.6.

Weird issues between iPhone Camera Roll and iPhoto?!?!?

I just noticed when opening Photos and then my Camera Roll of pics taken with my 3G that there is a large black irregular shape area covering the top 2 rows of pics and part of the third row as well. I have exited and returned to the app, shut down and restarted my iPhone and no change. If I tap in the black area (don't know what I'm tapping) it will bring up whatever photo is actually there, but there is no way to see it in the thumbnail preview screen because of the black overlay. If I connect the iPhone to my Macbook and open iPhoto, it seems to see that there are photos in my Camera Roll, but they are all blank and iPhoto thinks there are 32 photos there but there is not that many because I have deleted some of them :-O Clicking on a blank photo does not bring up the actual photo, just nothing happens.
So, to try and remedy this I manually deleted all the photos from my Camera Roll on the iPhone, so there were NO PHOTOS in the Camera Roll and then did a sync with my MacBook. iPhoto still thinks there are 32 photos and they are all blank placeholders like before! I tried to "import all" just to see what would happen and 4 were readable and the rest were "unreadable files". I said to delete all the photos after importing but it still lists 32 photos there. Even when the iPhone is disconnected, the iPhone icon stays in iPhoto and I have to manually unmount it. So, there is total disconnect between what is actually on my Camera Roll on the iPhone and what is being seen by iPhoto. It's as though iPhoto is stuck in a particular point in time and can't get rid of some cache or memory of a previous iPhone Camera Roll state. Before updating to OS 3.0, whenever I unplugged the iPhone after a sync, the icon would disappear as a mounted drive in iPhoto so that has changed as well.
I have no idea where to even begin trying to fix this problem. I'm using iPhoto 7.1.5 and not sure whether this is an iPhoto problem or iPhone problem or both?!?! Any feedback would be extremely appreciated!
Message was edited by: Joshua Morganstein

I'm having a similar issues. Every program on my Mac that is capable of acquiring images from a digital camera (iPhoto, Graphics Converter, Image Capture, etc.) thinks that my iPhone is mounted and that there are 77 pictures to download. It doesn't matter whether the phone is actually connected to the computer or not. I've even restored the iPhone to the factory state and it makes no difference. Thus, I believe the problem to be on the Mac itself. I don't know the details on how it works (could anyone enlighten me?) but I'm very surprised that multiple programs are having the same issue. Obviously, there is some layer that is between the actual device and the programs that use the device. That layer must be corrupted. But what is it, where is it, and how can I fix it?

Compatibiity issues between Microsoft Office 2013 and Epsom Workforce 1100 Wide Format Printer

I just purchased a new Pavilion 23 HP computer with Windows 8 Operating System and Office 2013. I bought an Epson Workforce 1100 Wide Format printer several years ago. Upon installing it on my new computer, I noticed it was for operating systems from 2000
to 7 and did not include Windows 8. I downloaded the recommended driver for Windows 8. My computer recognizes the printer and will print pictures, web-articles, etc. but will not print any text from any of the Office 2013 documents. Can you help me?

Hi,
I have a couple of questions about the issue:
1. Did the print task show in the status bar when you use Office2013 to print?
2. Did you try to print by using the Notepad?
3. Did you get some error messages?
If we cloud not print from the Notepad, it seems a
compatibility issues between Windows8 and print driver. I recommend you post the issue to Windows 8 forum or connect Epson support.
Then，we also cloud upgrade all the latest Windows 8 and Office 2013 patches to test.
Regards,
George Zhao
TechNet Community Support

Compatibility issues between solaris 10 patches and Weblogic server 9.2

Is there any documentation about possible incompatibility between certain solaris patches and Weblogic server?

Hi,
Can you post the output of below commands from your OS?
uname -a
getconf LONG_BIT
Do you want to download and install 64-bit WLS 9.2 on your OS?
- - Tarun

Performace Issues between WL 5.1 and WL6.0

Hello all and thank you in advance,
We're in the process of evaluating Weblogic 6.0 and have noticed a
considerable difference in server response times from Weblogic
5.1(sp9). Testing with a light load, 5 to 20 threads, our average
response
time has doubled when using Weblogic 6.0. We've done some reading about
the license limitation (5 connection limit) and tried taking numbers at
or below 5 threads, however it still seems that the response
times are 2 to 2.5 times slower.
We have not tried rebuilding using ejbc2.0 yet (however this is on the
list), and additionaly we are going to try another "fresh" install to
see what happeneds. Everything else we've done is pretty much by the
book.
Does anyone have any suggestions, or has Weblogic 6.0 been pigged out by
all of the new features.
Our system consist of multiple servlet, session beans, and entity beans
(bean managed persistance).
Any response is greatly appreciated.
Sean

Hello all and thank you in advance,
We're in the process of evaluating Weblogic 6.0 and have noticed a
considerable difference in server response times from Weblogic
5.1(sp9). Testing with a light load, 5 to 20 threads, our average
response
time has doubled when using Weblogic 6.0. We've done some reading about
the license limitation (5 connection limit) and tried taking numbers at
or below 5 threads, however it still seems that the response
times are 2 to 2.5 times slower.
We have not tried rebuilding using ejbc2.0 yet (however this is on the
list), and additionaly we are going to try another "fresh" install to
see what happeneds. Everything else we've done is pretty much by the
book.
Does anyone have any suggestions, or has Weblogic 6.0 been pigged out by
all of the new features.
Our system consist of multiple servlet, session beans, and entity beans
(bean managed persistance).
Any response is greatly appreciated.
Sean

Performance issue between WL 5.1 and WL 6.0

Hello all and thank you in advance,
We're in the process of evaluating Weblogic 6.0 and have noticed a
considerable difference in server response times from Weblogic
5.1(sp9). Testing with a light load, 5 to 20 threads, our average
response
time has doubled when using Weblogic 6.0. We've done some reading about
the license limitation (5 connection limit) and tried taking numbers at
or below 5 threads, however it still seems that the response
times are 2 to 2.5 times slower.
We have not tried rebuilding using ejbc2.0 yet (however this is on the
list), and additionaly we are going to try another "fresh" install to
see what happeneds. Everything else we've done is pretty much by the
book.
Does anyone have any suggestions, or has Weblogic 6.0 been pigged out by
all of the new features.
Our system consist of multiple servlet, session beans, and entity beans
(bean managed persistance).
Any response is greatly appreciated.
Sean

Hello all and thank you in advance,
We're in the process of evaluating Weblogic 6.0 and have noticed a
considerable difference in server response times from Weblogic
5.1(sp9). Testing with a light load, 5 to 20 threads, our average
response
time has doubled when using Weblogic 6.0. We've done some reading about
the license limitation (5 connection limit) and tried taking numbers at
or below 5 threads, however it still seems that the response
times are 2 to 2.5 times slower.
We have not tried rebuilding using ejbc2.0 yet (however this is on the
list), and additionaly we are going to try another "fresh" install to
see what happeneds. Everything else we've done is pretty much by the
book.
Does anyone have any suggestions, or has Weblogic 6.0 been pigged out by
all of the new features.
Our system consist of multiple servlet, session beans, and entity beans
(bean managed persistance).
Any response is greatly appreciated.
Sean

How can I resolve bluetooth connectivity issues between my iPhone 4S and my car?

My iPhone contantly unpairs from my car's bluetooth while I'm on a call. The phone is still working and I can continue the conversation if I hold it, but that is illegal in New Jersey. I have tried re-setting the iPhone, and re-pairing it with the car's bluetooth, but nothing has worked. My car (Lexus 350RX, 2012) is up to date with firmware. My daughter has the same issue with her iPhone 4S and her Honda Pilot. I may have to get a Samsum Galaxy if this issue is not resolved.

either export it as a pdf if you dont need to work in it or if you do use an app called numbers from apple it supports excel as far as i know

Black or white - any technical problems/issues between them?

I'm considering getting an iPad 2 (though I'm a bit worried now after reading some of the notes here about "backlight bleeding").
Are there any technical issues or other concerns in choosing between the black and white models?
For FaceTime or taking photos or videos, does the white case cause any reflection problems which don't occur with black?
Are case smudges or scratches more prone on one or the other, or more visible?
Are they both made of the same material and equally sturdy?
Anything else?
Since I'd probably get one of those new covers, the back of the iPad wouldn't be protected like my iPad 1 is now in the standard black case. So I'm a little concerned about how well the back holds up to being carried around in a backpack.
I guess I have no particular color preference. I don't care if it's black or white.
But I would like to get the model with the least potential problems, so any suggestions are welcome.
Thanks,
doug

Same material for both colours.
I have a black one, and I've used a white one quite a bit, there's no noticable difference. As for smudges, it's so easy to buff them clean again (Something the smart covers do when you close them) that it's not worth your concern.
As for the cover, the back won't survive long in your backpack. There are rear covers that work with the smart covers for around £10 (Something like $17-$20) on amazon. Invest in one, it's worth it.
Hope this helps...

Installed Lion, any known compatibity issue with Adobe CS4

So far so good, everything seems OK but was concerned with Photoshop CS4 as I had heard maybe some issues, anyone had any good/bad experiences?

it appears as though their may be some issues. Read what Adobe has to say :http://blogs.adobe.com/crawlspace/2011/07/photoshop-and-lightroom-compatibility- with-mac-os-x-10-7-lion.html Hope this helps

Any known 'porting' issues between 8.2.2 and 9.0 ??

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for