Any Program to sort by keywords faster than CS-PS6-Bridge For Keyword Search?

To sort by keywords in (CS-PS6)-Bridge one has to group all your folders under one overall folder. Then when you search by keywords (CS-PS6)-Bridge opens up all the photos in Bridge which take avery long time. Since Lightroom Smart Previews open up smaller files will it open up all ones pictures faster? and then can it sort by keywords.
I am assuming Lightroom smart preview opens up a larger size file than CS6-PS-6-Bridge and thus is even slower.
So the question becomes are there Any Program to sort by keywords faster than CS-6-Bridge For Keyword Search? i.e A program that doesn't have to open up a file to look at keywords or a way to open smaller thumbnails in Bridge?

Really?
You mean you can't just click on the Magnifying Glass in the Search Box like I can?
Uploaded with plasq's Skitch!
And then Select Rating?
Uploaded with plasq's Skitch!
And then click on the Third Dot and it will become a Star?
Uploaded with plasq's Skitch!
Or even use a Smart Album? File -> new Smart Album: My Rating -> is -> And there's click on the third dot to make it a star trick again?
Regards
TD

Similar Messages

Would sorting in UNIX faster than using order by?

Hi all, recently I was trying to optimize a query that returns a million rows. After using explain plan, I found that the 'order by' (3 columns needed) clause contributes to a significant portion of the cost.
I wonder if the process can be speed up by doing the query straight without ordering, then use the UNIX sort command (with the help of other commands, such as sed, awk... etc.) to perform the 'order by' instead. Of course you'll need to supply a whole bunch of strange parameters to sort command to make it work as expected.
But in terms of performance when the result set is huge, which one is faster? 'Order by' or UNIX sort?
Many thanks.

What are you sorting by ?
If it is a date and the output formats it with a 'Mon' component, then I'd bet on Oracle rather than any user written logic converting JAN to 01 etc.
As for the rest of it, it may depend on the memory allocated to the processes (so PGA setting may improve query performance). A million rows would probably require a disk sort, so the location/speed of that file would impact it too.

"tp import all" runs 24 times faster than "tp import TR " for long queue?

After a test upgrade to ECC 6.0, I processed 1200 individual transports in 12 hours. When I rebuilt the queue of 1200 transports and processed "tp import all", it completed in 30 minutes.
Should I expect "tp import all" to process 24 times faster than individual imports?
800 transports were client independent (code) and 400 transports were client-specific (configuration).
What run times have you seen?
What problems with "tp import all" have you seen?
Best regards,
Gary Sherwood

Hi Gary
You don't know the 800 transports which are wating for the import, what could be render your system in case of import all. so, that's why , i will prefer to you import individual request instead of import all.
offcourse, Import all are faster than the individual because it prepare all steps once to start import,
Regards
Anwer Waseem

WRT54G upload faster than download... for the love of jeff help!!!

This has been baffling me.. Ill try and keep it as short as possible.
3 devices on network
1 desktop (wired)
1 laptop (wireless)
1 xbox 360 (wired)
All of a sudden the desktop has shockingly slow download speeds.
Laptop uploads and downloads great
xbox 360 still playing GTA4 online great.
so i spent nearly 2 days straight trying to figure out a software issue, coudlnt do it.. formatted the main desktop machine.
First few hours I was finished with the format, downloaded great, i downloaded things like AVG, spywaredoctor(google supported), some video codec packages and VLC media player, windows media player 11. But thats it.
Prior to all this I had checked everything I could think of, it pings well, URL and Ip I can still surf barely but it does surf. I removed any BHO with hijack this prior to format reinstalled NIC drivers - reset router with didnt make much sense since other machiens were working great.
Now my upload speed is great on desktop machine, but my download speed is half that speed.
<a href="http://speedtest.dslreports.com"><img border=0 src="http://www.dslreports.com/im/52206876/69686.png"></a>
i dont know if that will show there, but thats the link
Text version of the speed test :
Speed Test #52206876 by dslreports.com
Run: 2008-06-07 17:14:59 EST
Download: 245 (Kbps)
Upload: 490 (Kbps)
In kilobytes per second: 30 down 59.8 up
Tested by server: 55 java
User: 2 @ dslreports.com
User's DNS: shawcable.net
Compared to the average of 191 tests from shawcable.net:
* download is 95% worse, upload is 15% worse "
If we could look past the fact that some people don't like the speed tests sites as accurate. Its obvious that something is wrong.
Can someone please help.

http://i248.photobucket.com/albums/gg181/Reinpret/speedtestpic.jpg
Message Edited by Reinpret on 06-07-2008 10:18 PM

HT4623 Is there any way to update iphone 3G higher than 4.2.1

Is there any way to update iphone 3G higher than 4.2.1

thanks for the info.. i guess i need to throw this thing to the far far away its make to much headache ^_^ anyway thanks guys...

PowerMac faster than intel Mac when running video programs?

Hello everyone! Having a question now so wonder if any of you have the same experience?
Recently i have many video works to do. I have a powerbook, which is the lasted 17inch powerbook and an intel imac (early 2008, 2.66GHz). I run the same version of finalcut pro and compressor. But thing become very strange, which is that when i run compressor to make final video files, my powerbook is much faster (about 2 times faster) than intel iMac. When i run XDCAM program to import video clips to finalcut from Sony XDCAM blueray reader, powerbook is also much more faster than intel iMac, and which is about 10time more faster than intel iMac. So it become very strange. I list my configurations below, and any of you can help me to solve the 'problem' or explain the strange fenominal.
Maybe theres anything wrong with software configurations, any one can also help me with that?
Thank you very much!
Powerbook G4 17inch:
CPU: powerpc G4 1,67GHz
RAM: 2GB (two 1GB module)
HDD: 120GB IDE
System: Mac OS X Leopard 10.5.8
Program: Final Cut Studio 2
iMac 20inch Early 2008
CPU: Intel Core 2 Duo 2,66GHz
RAM: 4GB (two 2GB module)
HDD: Cosair 256GB SSD
System: Mac OS X Lion 10.7 (tried also on Snow Leopard)
Program: Final Cut Studio 2 (tried also Final Cut Studio 3 on friends imac with the same configuration)
Camera:
Sony XDCAM PDW530 Broadcast Camcorder.
Media:
Sony XDCAM blueray disk
Reader:
Sony XDCAM blueray disc drive
Program:
XDCAM transfer for Final Cut Pro 2.12
XDCAM browser software 1.20

Of course it depends on what you're doing and how well you know how to use available resources... the general rule for Logic is:
>>>Fastest machine with the most RAM you can afford.<<<
That said, someone who knows what they're doing can get an amazing amount of effects and virtual instruments on an old PPC G5 computer running Logic 8.
So, while fast machines will allow more plugins/VI with less overloads... knowing what you're doing will take you further so that the difference between machines would not make a difference in the music.
pancenter-

Any program other than safari won't detect internet

any program other than safari won't detect internet eg. itunes, skype etc. I can't even system update.
Safari has no problems and I can use the internet fine.
Someone told me to check proxy settings and make sure "Use Passive FTP Mode" was ticked which it is...
Does anyone have any suggestions? I urgently need to fix this and I can't get an appointment to see anyone until next week.
Thanks!

Thanks Kaan for your reply,
Yes, Network does indicate that Airport is connected to the internet. Internet Explorer (OS X) connects instantly over the same network. Restarting Safari doesn't work. Waiting a few minutes doesn't work. Choosing a different web site to access doesn't work. Safari (1.3.1) has worked beautifully for months over this same network.
Thanks again and Happy New Year.
BJZTX
G4 Quicksilver Mac OS X (10.3.9) G4 Notebook 10.3.9

I read on the website that the update 4.0 was supposed to work faster than the last but I that since I updated (2 days ago) my work in firefox has become quite sluggish. Any suggestions?

Hi there. I upgraded to firefox 4 on Monday (two days ago) since I saw that the new version was supposed to run faster than firefox 3 that I was using. However, since I've started using it, I wait longer for a page to download than I had to before and the whole browser just is sluggish to respond. Any suggestions?

Sounds like it either believes that there are headphones plugged in, or the switch is broken.
Why in the world would you take it to Best Buy for service? Take it to an Apple Store. They can replace it on the spot if it's defective.

Unable to bootup after Yosemite install. have to keep shutting down from rear button. it does come on after a few times but then hangs at user login again. If you get in it is great. Seems faster than Mavericks but there is some sort of issue, bouts

unable to bootup after Yosemite install. have to keep shutting down from rear button. it does come on after a few times but then hangs at user login again. If you get in it is great. Seems faster than Mavericks but there is some sort of issue, bootup /login.

Knock on wood, this seems to have been my problem as well. I stumbled on this thread after dealing with this ridiculously-long boot times for the past several weeks.
I just reinstalled McAfee Antivirus and my Macbook Air booted up in less than 1 minute. No more hanging on the boot-up progress bar. No more hanging after I click on my user's avatar on the log-in screen. Bootup would often take 5+ minutes and sometimes never complete.
This has been SUPREMELY frustrating.
THANK YOU SO MUCH FOR POSTING YOUR RESPONSE!!!

Encore cs6 not any faster than 5.1

Encore cs6 not any faster than 5.1
I opened up a cs5.1 project in cs6 and did a "Preview from here" of a motion background with 8 motion thumbnails...running 40 secounds. Each version of Encore took 2 minutes to render the motion menu so i could preview it.
A little dissappointing. 32 bit vs 64. Same speed:-(
I have 32 gigs of ram. i7-980

heres a test. try importing a single 42gb timeline of 1080p into encore cs5, and now do the same thing for cs6. rendering may or may not be faster for menus, but you can get right to work on your project in cs6, while it processes in the background, vs cs5 having to stare at the yellow status bar for 90 minutes (it seemed, lol)

Hi, I have an iPhone 5s, recently its been a lot hotter than usual, also the battery life is going down a lot faster than usual, and it takes absolutely ages to charge up. There must be a serious problem with the battery, any ideas? thanks

Hi, I have an iPhone 5s, recently its been a lot hotter than usual, also the battery life is going down a lot faster than usual, and it takes absolutely ages to charge up. There must be a serious problem with the battery, any ideas? thanks

Apple can replace the battery for $79 US.
http://support.apple.com/kb/index?page=servicefaq&product=iphone

HT3775 Is there any program than converts .pvm files to files that can be played by Quick time player?(I own a mac)

Is there any program than converts .pvm files to files that can be played by Quick time player?

Oh no... NOT THE 99-PAGER!!! Anything but THAT!!!

I just upgraded my Internet service to 12 MPS. It doesn't appear to work any faster than the 3MPS I had before. The AT

I just upgraded my Internet service to 12 MPS. It doesn't appear to work any faster than the 3MPS I had before. The AT&T guy said it may be the computer rather than the connection. I have an iMac intel core 2 duo, running OS 10.5.8. It has 1 GB of memory. I have plenty of memory left. Is there something I can check on the computer to see if it's capable of running faster with this new Internet upgrade?

You certainly are going to see improvements if you download big files, i.e. Apple updates, or watching trailers also at higher resolution.
You won't see much difference if you use peer to peer download.

Problems running basic text in aftereffects faster than 19fps... what exactly do I need?

OK, so I finaly upgraded my computer into the mild 21st century, and to my disapointment, I cannot seem to run anything as smoothly as I had thought.
These are the specs for my computer...
ASUS m5a99x EVO motherboard
8 gigs ddr3 1600 ram
NVIDIA 9800gt 1 gig ddr3 gpu
AMD Phenom II x4 B50 Processor at 3.2ghz (IE its an AMD athlon II 450 X3 3.2ghz with its fourth core unlocked (of which i have had no problems with thus far, as it seems to be very stable)
150 gig 7200 sata 2 harddrive (OLD)
200 gig 5400 sata 2 hard drive (OLD AS SH*T)
300ghz portable usb2 hd (7200) (2 years old)
Basicly, I cant seem to run even basic text in after effects faster than 19 FPS.
I've tried to change the resolution to half, and even a fourth, and that didnt work at all, infact it made it run about 1 frame worse.
I tried changing the Open gl texture memory, raising and lowering, but to no avail, Ive changed the ram usage in after effects to use 2 gigs per core, then one gig, then turned off multiframe rendering alltogether, and nothing.
I feel like ive tried everything in my power.
Now the Imacs at my school, they run the program smooth as hell... and they arent that much better, spec wise than my computer.
Even my friends Imac can run it smooth, and he only has an I5 cpu at 2.4ghz, which is fine and my understanding of cpus is that those are better proccessors, but its not that much better, and even still, why would that be neccesary just to run text scrolling accross the screen?
Even more so, why would changing the resolution not have any effect?
What exactly do I need to run after effects smoothly for a basic text scroll at say, 720P?
I need to know what to upgrade, soon I plan to get cs6 and I would like to have a computer that can edit basic HD properly.
What I realy dont get is that I know people with laptops that are running AE smoothly and these are much worse than the specs on my machine, some even with only 4 gigs of ram...
Is there something wrong, do I have some sort of frame limiter thats capping at 19 fps? is there some sort of memory leak?
Any help would be much apreciated.
Now the only thing I can think of thats holding me back is the crappy hard drives, every thing else seems like it should at least run text on after effects at 30 fps.

thanks, that at least is enough to get me started, lol I have a deadline tomorrow and have been burning a lot of time on just trying to get this to run smooth.
BTW, I am running the project off of the portable, I switched from the old, but faster harddrive that was sata2 to the portable given I thought that might increase the speed, which it didnt.
what I might do is crack the case and just plug it straight into the computer, though I am hesitant to do so as if I were going to do that, I might as well just purchase a usb 3.0 one and do that so i can get sata 3 out of it, since those cases dont exactly just snap back together.
When I say basic text, I mean layered text, just word after word in order. I honestly dont have any plugins that I know of, (if I had the money for them I would have spent it on a better computer probably) so what I have is what came with the master collection.
And when I say 19 FPS I mean spacebar...
NOW I KNOW, that Im not garunteed 30 fps when running the preview, but when I use the mac, it previews fine... and i just looked up my CPU in comparison to the I5 in the IMAC that I was refering to, and mine is actualy faster according to some benchmarks, granted its not faster than the vast majority of I5s and I7s, but the particular ones in the computers I was refering to, mine is actualy faster over all, so I figure its not a CPU thing (unless its a -our software only works right on INTEL- thing).
Now as far as the 3d camera, yes I am using it, but even when I run the text without a camera function (ie the thing that you have in your comp) or any sort of 3d layering it runs just as slow.
The Audio might be a problem, I used to have a soundcard, but that died about a year ago so I have been using onboard sound (realtek HD something) which truly sucks in comparison to a proper sound card, but I cant imagine the IMACs have anything better, I mean the sound from the Imac kinda sucks alltogether, dosent even have any sort of virtual surround... But a driver issue it could be, realtek is kind of ghetto in that regard.
I will try some of the tips above (the open gl and the preview output and such), and thank you very much.
*EDIT*
OK, so with the preview output, I have computer monitor only? is that what you ment?
*EDIT*
OK, so I did the OpenGL thing, removed it, and for a brief few secconds, it started to run at a mix of 25 to 30 fps, then, when I went to play it again, it was back at 19.

SQL7 is 60% faster than Oracle8051EE in my test

Hi people,
I did a simple test over the weekend and want to share with
u. "SQL7 is Faster than Oracle8051 by 60% in my little test".
Perhape somebody can point out what I had not setup correctly.
one same PC installed with multi boot:
Microsoft platform
==================
NT4 Service Pack 4
SQL7
JDK1.2
JDBC from SQL7 installation
Linux Oracle Platform
=====================
RedHat linux 5.2
Oracle8051EE
jdk1.1.7A
jdbc ( oci ) from Oracle8051EE installation
I used identical Java program ( almost identical, except the
connection string) to insert 100,000 record into both platform(
one platform at a time). The table has 2 fields ( on NT name
varchar(50) and Address varchar(1024). On Oracle, is varchar2
with the same size ). No index is created in both platform. And
Linux Oracle took 32 minutes, NT SQL7 took only 13 minutes.
I were hoping that it is the different version of JDK that
contribute to the compareingly slowness in Linux Oracle.
Any one else can share some light ?
Regards
Nathan
[email protected]
null

Hi,
please don'feel offended, but I think the problem with these
sort of benchmarks are:
a. It's not obvious the servers (in both cases) are optimally
tuned for the task to be done
b. The task is far too simple to state that SQL7 is 60% faster
than ORACLE 8
c. I don't know any installation where inserting 100000 rows
is the main business for the DBMS installed. Normally there's
a mix of about 85% selecting and 15% writing data (these
percentages may differ for your installation). So if you
want to test the performance of a DBMS, a bit of selecting
data wouldn't harm your benchmark
d. You did a single user benchmark (I assume). An important
issue is the behaviour of a system under multi-user load.
(NT is very strong at this point ;-)
e. The outcome of these benchmarks is irrelevant (see above)
but the psychological effect isn't ! It is the kind of
messages salesmen sprinkle around. A lot of hot air but
nothing behind it.
without wanting to be offensive, I think the correct title for
your message should have been:
I managed to configure an SQL7 and an ORACLE 8 in such way, that
an insert-job of 100000 rows is about 60% faster on the SQL7
engine. (I admit, this doesn't sound very spectacular)
Ronald
Nathan Phan (guest) wrote:
: Hi people,
: I did a simple test over the weekend and want to share with
: u. "SQL7 is Faster than Oracle8051 by 60% in my little test".
: Perhape somebody can point out what I had not setup correctly.
: one same PC installed with multi boot:
: Microsoft platform
: ==================
: NT4 Service Pack 4
: SQL7
: JDK1.2
: JDBC from SQL7 installation
: Linux Oracle Platform
: =====================
: RedHat linux 5.2
: Oracle8051EE
: jdk1.1.7A
: jdbc ( oci ) from Oracle8051EE installation
: I used identical Java program ( almost identical, except the
: connection string) to insert 100,000 record into both platform(
: one platform at a time). The table has 2 fields ( on NT name
: varchar(50) and Address varchar(1024). On Oracle, is varchar2
: with the same size ). No index is created in both platform. And
: Linux Oracle took 32 minutes, NT SQL7 took only 13 minutes.
: I were hoping that it is the different version of JDK that
: contribute to the compareingly slowness in Linux Oracle.
: Any one else can share some light ?
: Regards
: Nathan
: [email protected]
null

Any Program to sort by keywords faster than CS-PS6-Bridge For Keyword Search?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for