Any RH 9 HTML Link to Word users out there?

Sorry to throw another one other here, but I'm currently testing a trial version of RH9 and I'm struggling with the new linking enhancements.
Here's the "what's new in RH9" lingo:
While importing or linking a document, you can modify the character and paragraph styles defined in the document. In the case of linked documents, style properties modified from within Microsoft Word or FrameMaker and modified from within RoboHelp can now co-exist. In other words, you can modify the style properties that you want to override in RoboHelp and allow other style properties to be modified in Microsoft Word or FrameMaker. 
RoboHelp 9 maintains two styles sheets to manage the styles of a linked document. A [topic].css file stores the styles defined in the source document. The global CSS file, by default named RHStyleMapping.css, stores the details of modifications and mapped RoboHelp styles.
RoboHelp stores each modified style with the style name WD_[original_style_name] (in the case of Microsoft Word) or FM_[original_style_name] (in the case of FrameMaker) in RHStyleMapping.css.
Note: RoboHelp hides the [topic].css files from the workspace to ensure that source styles are preserved in this file.
Can anyone provide a few steps so I could test this out? Or else explain the benefit of this if all of my styles and formatting will be done in Word?
I appreciate it!

Hello,
This is a tricky situation, I would say, Peter has referred to a very good post explaining the process, nicely.
If you would like to include your topics from RHx5 HTML to RH9 HTML, I would advise you to got to your RH9 HTML project--
Select File> Import> HTML/XHTML File and Select All the ".HTM" topic files from you source RoboHelp Project. You would regain all the Topics in your Project Files list
Similarly you can either import the TOC, Index, Glossary files, individually or use RoboHelp's Auto-Generate wizard to recreate them afresh.
This is a workaround, and there is a possibility that some of your objects might not migrate as expected, as there has been a lot of change in the architecture/design of project elements from version 5 to 9.Hence, a sequential Upgarde in project is always recommended.
Thanks,
Anjaneai Srivastava

Similar Messages

  • OT - Ratio of Thunderbird users out there?

    What do you suspect is the ratio of Thunderbird (email
    client) users out
    there? If I need to narrow it down, I'll say North America.
    Rough guesstimate is fine..

    On 01 Dec 2006 in macromedia.dreamweaver, R. Jay wrote:
    > What do you suspect is the ratio of Thunderbird (email
    client) users
    > out there? If I need to narrow it down, I'll say North
    America.
    >
    > Rough guesstimate is fine..
    7%. I have 161 messages in my inbox dating back to 2 Oct
    2006. Of the
    161, 11 show "User-Agent: Thunderbird ..." in the headers.
    (10 of
    those were 1.5.0.7.) Of the remaining 150, 106 have an
    X-Mailer
    header, which breaks out like this:
    7.0 for Windows sub 123 1
    8.0 for Windows sub 6036 2
    9.0 for Windows sub 5039 3
    9.0 for Windows sub 5060 1
    9.0 for Windows sub 5125 1
    AOL WebMail 20836 2
    AOL WebMail 22250 3
    BigSender
    http://CraigRichards.com/software
    1
    Juno 5.0.49 1
    Listrak 1
    Lotus Notes Release 6.5.5 November 30, 2005 2
    MIME::Lite 2.117 (F2.6) 7
    Microsoft CDO for Windows 2000 1
    Microsoft Office Outlook 11 4
    Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 3
    Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180 1
    Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2869 25
    Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) 2
    Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.3416 6
    Novell GroupWise 5.5.5 3
    Pegasus Mail for Windows (4.21c) 2
    QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.0.1.0 21
    Unknown (No Version) 1
    Webmail Version 4.0 12
    A lot of the rest are Hotmail. As always, YMMV.
    Joe Makowiec
    http://makowiec.net/
    Email:
    http://makowiec.net/email.php

  • Microsoft EXEL and Word users, is there any way to make the program fill

    the whole screen? Like in Windows? i really dont like all these menus flying everywhere...
    any thoughts?
    thanx!!

    You can try using this.
    It doesn't keep the menus from "flying everywhere" (that's just the way things work on the Mac; actually, some Linux environments too), but at least it makes it possible to maximize the apps to full screen.

  • Are there any Blender 3D users out there.... Node editor glitch

    I work on a MacBook Pro (Santa Rosa 2.2) with OS X 10.4.11 and have noticed that the "previews" in the node editor have weird lines and visual glitches. See http://entplex.org/node_preview.png and http://entplex.org/node_preview2.png. Note the static in the viewer and comp nodes. This occurs with both 2.44 and 2.45. This occurs with ANY node setup I try and even after reseting user defaults in blender. I have even gone as far as trying to run blender from a clean install of os x on an external hard drive. Has anyone else noticed this or is there something wrong with my system? Can anyone confirm or deny this?

    *looks like a graphics card issue.*
    *try looking here: http://www.blendernation.com/2008/02/22/blender-problems-on-leopard-solved/*
    *Also, that stretching comes from your (output) format ... usually.*
    *I'd try moving your output to ntsc (720x486) and deselecting fields (if those are selected)*

  • Any former Avid users out there....

    I am helping a another company gather footage from our library. However, they use Avid (PC version) and we run all Final Cut. Two days ago I gave them a hard drive with all the digitized footage as Quicktime movies using either an HDV codec (HDV 720p30 shot from a JVC GY-HD100) or DV/DVCPRO NTSC codec.
    The producer and editor have both told me that they cannot open some of the files and are having problems bringing other files into Avid. So what is the native file format/codec for Avid? Should I give them avi files?
    While I have not worked with Avid directly I assumed it was similar to FCP (or maybe FCP is similar to Avid depending on which side of the fence you're on). I figured you could ingest just about anything and while you may have to render it, it should fit on the same timeline.
    As a small insight, I talked to the producer yesterday who said that some of the footage was in an odd size. He said it was bigger than the usual 720 by something (these are the producers words paraphrased). I told him it was high definition. He said well let me pass you over to the editor whose cutting the project. The editor gets on the phone and asks, "As part of your normal workflow do you guys normally mix SD and HD in the same project?" Apparently he'd never heard of doing such a thing.
    I wasn't sure if this guy had just crawled out from under a rock and realized that much of the Western world was now getting more involved with HD...maybe he just watched the Super Bowl in High Definition. I don't know, but I told him that we do it all the time - upres SD to HD or downconverting HD to SD is a pretty common part of our workflow.
    So I am trying to figure out how can I give the footage to them so they can easily ingest it (avi, OMF, Quicktime with a certain codec, etc). I am not getting paid to do their laundry so I am trying to make it as simple as possible to get this footage to them. Any ideas?

    You might have an incompatibly formatted drive. Some of your files are accessible in that file structure, others are not. Seen it happen. No clue.
    Or, of course, you could send them a tape or two, then let them recapture.
    <
    This is the best possible solution unless you are prepared to work on the least common denominator which is likely to be an extreme choice: the lossless and hugely prolific Animation codec. (There must be other inter-platform codecs, I've never used Avid, so I dunno)
    You can get additional help by posting a similar question on an Avid forum. Try creativecow.net and try not to take the elitists personally over there. They think anything that isn't purple is a threat unto their livelihoods and are likely to be rather, umm, snippy. Not like us at all.
    Suggest you couch it like this: "I had to give up my favorite and ultracool Avid to go to work at a shop that is all, get this, Final Cut. I used to be able to exchange my QT files with my old Avid Macintosh chums easily but some of my old Avid chums have been forced to switch from their Macs to PC versions (can you IMAGINE?) and they need media from me. I use these formats on FCP (list here). What's the no-brainer pathway for us to exchange media freely and openly since we're all brothers and sisters working together on the same creative team and want to be able to work together without any finger-pointing since none of our editing platform decisions were our own."
    bogiesan

  • Any UK/European users out there?

    Does anyone have any insight into the practicalities of iPad use between countries? In my case, I live in UK (and can buy an iPad here) ... but I also spend time in Italy, where I would like to use it to access the Internet and e-mail. How do I do that?
    I'm trying to avoid paying the roaming charges, by having two accounts and two sim cards , so that , if possible I am charged the respective rates for whichever country I am in. Anyone know if this is feasible?

    Brought my IPad 3G which was purchased in the USA to the UK and went to the Apple Store in Cambridge for help on changing from AT&T to a UK sim card provider. Their genius offered no help. Went to the O2 store and they had a mini sim card and account for the IPad however when the sim card was inserted it would not bring up the account set up portal View Account so there was no way to set up the account on my IPad. Fortunately the manager of the store had a IPad 3G which he purchased in the UK and he was able to set up my O2 sim card account on his IPad and then move it to my IPad. This round about worked and I was able to use 3G which is very spotty in the UK during my visit. However, there was NO View Account setting to cancel the the account and I had to go back to the store and have the same manager put the sim card into his IPad to cancel the account prior to leaving. This experience would negate that you can easily travel and use mini sim cards from other countries in your IPad. Is this a glitch with Apple software that does not allow you to open multiple sim card accounts? Regardless, it needs to be addressed and corrected by Apple as many people like myself purchased the 3G model believing the marketing that they could easily use it with multiple sim card accounts while traveling abroad. I appreciate any comments...especially from Apple.

  • Any Logic 8 / EWQLSO users out there?

    Hello guys
    I am using Logic 8.0.1 on a PPC G5 iMac and I'm getting some weird problems with the East West Quantum Leap Sound Orchestra, apart from the fact that I won't be able to use it when I get an intel mac! My soundcard is an RME Fireface 800.
    It all runs smoothly as long as i only use it in certain configurations. You know when you boot the plugin, you get a choice of which configuration you want to use.
    These work fine:
    Mono
    Stereo
    16 x mono
    5.1
    These produce some bizarre digi feedvback / pink noise type sounds:
    16 x stereo
    1 x 5.1, 15 mono
    and all the others in the list basically...
    I'm not worried about 5.1 as I don't work with that format but I would like to use 16 x stereo Can anyone explain why this is happening, is it a bug or am I doing something wrong.
    Any help much appreciated.
    Thanks

    I'm experiencing exactly the same problem with the Trilogy wrapper. Spectrasonics support recommends increasing buffer size. I tried (from 128->1056) to no avail. On playback with the wrapper instantiated on a track, my Apogee Ensemble overloads due to an extremely loud click - then, silence - no audio. Unchecking the wrapper in the Logic AU Manager solves the problem. It's obviously a "wrapper-induced" problem which Spectrasonics has difficulty dealing with
    Spectrasonics has no apparent solution nor do I. At this point I'll punt on Trilogy. Their support team told me not to expect a new Trilogy until after their STEAM-based Omnisphere is released on September 15, 2008. The universal binary version of Trilogy will also be STEAM-based.

  • I would be ever so grateful to any Indesign Cs5.5 users out there...

    I need to convert a CS5.5 file of approx. 6 mbs to an XML mark up language file ASAP. I didn't realize they were incompatible an. d due to some software snafu's created it in 5.5. I now need the file in CS5 and have uninstalled Cs5.5 and am not interested in downloading it again.
    If you can help me, please email [email protected] and I will send you the file.
    Thank you.

    Assuming you mean IDML ("XML mark up" can mean many things), happy to do it.
    Replied via e-mail as well.

  • Any 1st Gen iPod users out there? M8541

    All this talk about shiny new iPods has got me all nostalgic over my lovely old 1st gen scroll wheel model (M8541). Alas the hard disk died on that a year ago and it's been gathering dust ever since.
    I've been Googling trying to find others in the same predicament, and hopefully some details on how to obtain a new/refurbed hard disk and bring the old timer back to life. Alas, I've not got very far as yet, which either means my searching skills aren't up to much, or it's just way too difficult so no-one's succeeded.
    What I'd really like is to find some kind of flash memory with the same ATA-5 interface used by the original disk, so I can have something a bit more durable in there. I'm sure this must be possible and am hoping there might be someone out there who's tried the same or knows enough to convince me I'm wasting my time.
    I've found what looks like a viable replacement disk here :
    http://www.evertek.com/viewpart.asp?auto=14710
    Price is good too, though the part number is MK5002MAL-R where my original doesn't have the -R on the end, so not sure it's a drop-in replacement.
    Help, anyone?
    Firebook 1.67Ghz   Mac OS X (10.4.7)   1st gen iPod and Nano

    I have this model too. Is yours a 5 or 10 GB? Also, I you using it on Win or Mac? Mine is Mac but want to use it on Win.....is it possible to reformat it to work? I;ll see if my search skills can help ya find a new HD for yours.
    Thanks
      Windows XP  

  • Any westcoast Canada users out there?

    I have a hard time setting up pop mail in mail 3.3, not matter what I do, I can only send but cannot receive email. I have talked to both my work and home isp, no luck with that. Is there anybody using Shaw or Telus can answer my question? Thanks Alex

    Like I said, I'm using IMAP, so my settings won't help you if you are wanting to configure POP. They will only help you if you switch to IMAP.
    It only takes a minute or two to visit Telus' customer website and switch to IMAP. Do you still want me to share my IMAP settings with you?

  • Any  IMAC Reason user  out there (music heads)

    I just purchased 20inch Imac 3weeks + bought Reasons 3.0..... It ask me to install the 3.0.5 for intel MACS.
    which I did ......
    Problem installing Reason ... The error message "can not locate Reason Audio engine".
    My exec partner has a 17inch IMAC..its about 6mos old.. It installed smoothly
    I'm not sure if maybe Intel/MAC has a conversion duo update that allow programs to install
    or Do i need to disable something ? or a folder..
    Please help
    Thanks
    I mac 20 inch   Mac OS X (10.4.9)   Reasons / Protools (MBOX2)

    Propellehead has an article on that problem here, but not having an account with them (and not wishing to set one up), I can't read it and so be sure it will address your issue. Worth checking out, though.

  • Cineform users out there?

    Hi all,
    I'm sorry for this "repeated" topic but I can't find a clear answer.
    After trying several "Free" conversion methods, I decided to try Cineforms HD
    All I want to do is get the MAX quality going from HD to  DVD
    I have a HDV 23.976 timeline.
    I want to Downres to SD (for DVD)
    My workflow has been  :
    Render HD to Mpeg-dvd preset
    Import it into encore.
    I have cineform's NeoHD (trial)
    I don't know where the downsize takes place.
    Do I simply change the 1440 size to 720  and that's it?
    I Can NOT find ANY Info ANYWHERE explaining step by step on how to down size to DVD
    Thanks guys,
    lou

    The original poster wanted to know what the Cineform workflow for converting to SD from HD was so I wanted to mention that scaling was part of it.
    Here is a thread that talks in detail about the scaling and the use of HDLink to scale.  It seems things may be more complex than I originally thought as discussed by Roger Averdahl at the end.
    Look at post # 5 and 6 and then at the end.  If you do File-Export -Movie, downscale the output with the settings there.  If HDLink use Convert and then set the output settings to SD.
    http://www.dvinfo.net/forum/cineform-software-showcase/483545-cs5-cf-standard-dvd.html
    I use Bob's procedure without the Procoder.
    John

  • Picasa users out there? Can't upload to Picasa web albums - time out error

    Hi All,
    After posting numerous times on the google picasa forums, I am hoping someone can help me here. Not sure if this is the correct discussion area.
    I have been having this issue for a few weeks now and it's driving me mad. Hope someone can help.
    Everything used to work fine, but now whenever I try to upload photos I just get a message saying "Error request failed. Upload failed". Looking into the log file:
    Modified request headers:
    Added header: Content-Type: multipart/form-data; boundary=---------------------------54BEB7A34478
    Added header: Content-Length: 66700
    Added header: Accept-Encoding: gzip
    Post data size: 66700
    [216789878] id 37: Error: Read stream timed out (-4)
    [216789882] Upload failure reported. Retry allowed: (1)
    [216789883] Retry allowed: retry count = 7, in 0 seconds
    [216789883] Too many retries (or retry not allowed), setting status failed
    [216789884] Upload failed - err: (-7)
    Doesn't say much to me.
    I am running Picasa v3.05 for Mac (10.5.7). Have tried various settings in my Firewall including switching it of all together, specifically adding Picasa under System Preferences > Security > 'Firewall' tab, rebooting my machine, banging head against brick wall etc....
    Emailing my photos to Picasa works fine.
    Any suggestions would be good.
    I have searched the net and tried all suggestions to those people who have had any upload issues previoulsy, but to no avail.
    Something to do with proxies maybe?
    Not sure if it's a Picasa, Mac, Firefox, Internet or firewall setting, so if you have any ideas, I would be very grateful to receive them!
    Any experts who can help me? Thanks!
    OOB

    Okay, just coming back to close this issue. I reset my Netgear modem to factory settings, set up my connections from scratch and hey presto, Picasa decided to work again. Not sure why it stopped working as I never fiddle with my modem settings (which is secured btw!). And that's after 3 weeks of searching the net and trying everything on my mac!
    Hope that helps anyone else with similar problems in future!

  • Any non-spatial, non-MC, GTK file manager out there?

    Hi,
    I'm looking for something between ROX and XFM, it seems.
    Something like a GTK version of XFM to use with XFCE4.
    I don't like spatial, that's the only reason why I ditched ROX.
    I've been using XFM lately, but it's not GTK.
    Any ideas?
    Thanks in advance,
    Bruno

    bruno wrote:
    dp wrote: i know, you need something in gtk2, but if something like this would exist that uses gtk2 and has all features konqueror has, i would use it --- konqueror you need a little hdd-space for installation and have to wait once that kdeinit starts, but then, it's great :-)
    Have a look at Endeavour2. It's GTK1, but since you're not working in KDE (or so it seems) it might be a lighter alternative.
    i run kdeinit from x-startup, because i use some kde apps quite often (kmail, korganizer, amarok ...), so once a day i'm waiting to kdeinit to start anyway
    endeavour2 is gtk1 (what makes it look strange on a 15" screen in UXGA - everything small) and it's front remembers too much on windows (and this makes me a little bit nervous - out of custom ;-) ; it's almost an instinct to save files every 2 min under windows or want to if the gui looks similar)
    it is of course a lighter alternative (konqueror has momentum starting), and if it would be gtk2 it would be a really great tool
    bruno wrote:
    I have to google if it's possible to use AA fonts in GTK1 somehow.
    Of course Konqueror has the advantage of being a web browser has well
    EDIT: Hmmm... http://gdkxft.sourceforge.net/
    EDIT2: Damn. Seems it's not very stable
    Bruno
    gdkxft looks promising, but is in the beginning - and i don't give gtk1 a really great future - let's hope someone ports the rest of gtk1-apps to gtk2 ;-)

  • Any high definition video noise reduction programs/plugins out there?

    i have a Sony HDR HC1, and im just using iMovie to import the HD video then send it to FCE3.5.....and i dont plan to buy a new camera until i make my second low-budget feature (editing my first right now).....and i have some low-light shots that shows bluish-colored noise (the camera has a CMOS chip) and i need to know how to get rid of the noise (and for a less noisy picture overall, even though very little in normal light conditions).

    Er, 'Cineframe' (pseudo 24p) and 'CineGamma' (film-like brightness range) are available on the bigger FX1 and Z1, but not on the smaller HC1, sorry. But the HC1 has a similar (or maybe identical) 'Cinema Effect', which does simulate 24fps film.
    However, you can't choose this (under 'D. EFFECT' in the 'PICT. APPLI.' menu) if you've already chosen a film-like manual shutter speed ..e.g; 1/25.
    You can't keep the 'film-like' manual 25 shutter speed, either, if you choose, in the 'PROGRAM AE' menu, 'PORTRAIT' (..which generally tries to give the widest available aperture, to give shallow depth-of-field like a 35mm film camera lens).
    So for a "film-like" appearance with the HC1 I'd choose:
    Manual shutter speed - 25
    Sharpness - up a bit from normal
    Steadyshot - ON
    Manual exposure - ON (..that's the little round button next to the 'Exposure/Vol' switch on the left-hand side, below the Backlight button..)
    This HD Sony camcorder is probably way beyond the price range you're interested in, but the V1U does offer most of what you want..!
    The Panasonic HVX200 is extremely versatile ..but the cost of memory cards is probably prohibitive ..unless you shoot only 8 minutes at a time!
    (..Here's a useful comparison between the earlier Sonys, JVC and the Panasonic, but it doesn't mention the new V1U..)
    (..The Canon XL2 offers 24p and interchangeable lenses, but no HDV..)
    Essentially, the JVC HD100/110 shoots only HDV (or DV) 720p (24, 25, 30fps), Progressive (full frame) format, and doesn't shoot "video-like" 1080i (interlaced) at all. So it's specifically intended for tape-to-film transfer, which may be what you want.
    Here's a .pdf of the instruction book.
    Notice that the JVC is a manual focus camera ..there is no autofocus at all. It comes with a 16x zoom, but no figures given for its low-light limit, such as 4 lux or 6 lux.
    The original HDV 1-chip JVC GR-HD1 is to be avoided, as its low-light performance - and performance overall - is pretty poor.
    The new Sony V1, having a fixed, built-in, non-interchangeable lens does have autofocus - though that can be switched off. It shoots HDV 24p and 30p, but also 'normal' non-progressive video. Here's Adam Wilt's assessment of it. It has a 20x zoom, and shoots down to about 4 lux.
    Sony's earlier - and cheaper - Z1 has a 12x (autofocus) zoom, 60i and 50i video shooting, and 'synthesized' 30p, 25p and 24p modes, which Sony calls 30F, 25F and 24F ..as these are progressive frames constructed from various interleaved fields and frames. So 24F isn't exactly the same as 24p. Minimum light: 3 lux.
    [..The 'super-HAD' CCDs in the FX1/Z1 don't appear to give any vertical smear of bright highlights ..though that's often quoted as a particular selling point of CMOS chips, compared with CCDs..]
    I use the UK-only 50i version (the FX1) of the Z1, and can say that it's excellent in incredibly low light. These HDV Sonys (..except the 7 lux HC1..) all feature optional "CineGamma", which alters the recorded brightness range to look more like film than video, and "CineFrame" which is this artificial progressive mode - called 'Cinema Effect' on the HC1.
    Here's some more info about Sony's 'CineFrame' pseudo 24p.
    In summary:
    The JVC is the nearest HDV you'll get to true 24p, but it's less easy to handle (no autofocus, 16x zoom) than a Sony, and doesn't offer interlaced video recording like a normal camcorder ..so it'd probably be inappropriate for shooting for TV.
    The V1 is a multi-talented video/24p camera, with a big 20x zoom, low-light, but doesn't take interchangeable lenses.
    The Panasonic HVX200 seems to offer the best of many worlds, but has only a 13x built-in zoom, and although it shoots extremely hi-quality material onto memory cards, they're expensive and have only a small capacity.
    Yer pays yer money and yer takes yer choice..

Maybe you are looking for