"any" vs "all" when filtering SMART COLLECTIONS

Need help from the pros in this group. I've to teach a specific skill to some students tomorrow, and--I must admit--I'm a little lost. Can sometime provide detailed answers to me? I'd be much obliged.
I need to know the distinction between filtering between "any" and "all" in smart collections.
Basically, what does that mean? I mean, to me, filtering between, say, "any" clips with the a certain attribute would be the same as my wanting to see "all" of the same. I'm a bit embarrassed to say I can't wrap my mind around the concept.
The first choice of "all" vs. "any" is when you go into the first level of the filter, itself:
Then, you have the same options for each filter variable:
I've an excercise where I have students have to filter smart collections based on keywords and shot compositioin. And the devil is in being able to distinguish between "any" and all"
Any help for "any" or "all" of you would be greatly appreciated.

the words "any" and "all" do not refer to clips, but to criteria.
"any" means "or"
"all" means "and"
In your example:
1) you would set a smart collection for clips satisfying ALL of
     - having the keyword "shoes"
     - being favorites
2) similarly, but ANY (as in either or)
3) is a bit of combination of both; you have  (two people or group) AND Favorites, so you need to set "all";
and in the people category choose "any".

Similar Messages

  • Learning Filtering: Smart Collections doesn't show all filtered images

    I'm studying using Classroom In A Book so this test is small and only using the few images provided on the CIAB CD.
    It says in the book that a Smart Collection is a selection filtered according to whatever rules you specify.
    This is fine, but when I click the down arrow to the left side of the screen to see the listings under Smart Collections only some of the filtered images are shown. Images that I marked with red are shown as a Smart Collection. Images that I marked with Green (only one) does not show. A single image that I marked with five stars shows up as a Smart Collection, so it can't be that you need more than one item marked before it shows up as a Smart Collection. I made sure that I have highlighted the folder that contains the images (made it local) and that they are displayed in Library Mode and in Grid View.
    What might cause some of the images I have applied filter attributes to not to show up in Smart Collections?
    TIA,
    Ken

    dorin_nicolaescu wrote:
    Images that I marked with red are shown as a Smart Collection. Images that I marked with Green (only one) does not show. A single image that I marked with five stars shows up as a Smart Collection
    What does the book say? It says "a Smart Collection is a selection filtered according to whatever rules you specify." It means the rules you specify for you r smart collection. These are default "canned" lightroom collections. The first happens to have the rule "show labelled with red", the second — "show 5-star images". Images tha match the rules defined in a SC - are displayed in that SC.
    Double-click any smart collection to see its rules.
    To create a new smart collection with your own rules, click Library>New Smart Collection.
    The Smart Collections I have were created without me double-clicking on anything. The book just told me to try out some of the ways to mark images and to try out each way. All of a sudden, Smart Collections appeared with some of the marked images. I was just wondering why it stopped at some but did not do them all? Also, what if I don't want Smart Collections at this point? How do I turn it off from making arbitrary Smart Collections without my prompting?
    Don't get me wrong dorin_nicolaescu, I am a beginner and know nothing. You sound like you have a good grip on what Smart Collections are and how they work. What you have writtenis helpful, especially the part about "To create a new smart collection with your own rules, click Library>New Smart Collection."
    I am still in a Fog about why Smart Collections starts collections on its own.

  • Is it possible to add more criteria when configuring smart collections?

    Looking to build a smart collection with the following criteria:
    Average number of colours greater than 1000 (to filter out B/W & grayscale images)
    Minimum # pixels in image (to filter out small images)
    Aspect ratio is within 20% of 16:9 (to filter out images that won't look good on HD dispaly)
    Less than 35% similar to any other image (to filter out duplicates)
    Possible?

    It's possible to add more criteria by clicking the plus symbol to the right but not to the extent of the complexity you require. The nearest you could get (click image below) would perhaps provide a starting point but you would need some manual intervention, at least for duplicates.

  • Lost all my keyword smart collection data

    I temporarily turned off time machine for various reasons and something happened and I've lost my data I constructed to label clip keywords and group/smart collections etc.
    Not sure if I can get it back. I hope I don't have to go back to lesson 3 and start over!
    I do have a Final Cut Events folder and Final Cut Projects folder inside of the Movies folder on my HD.
       Dave

    I am sooo sorry!  Looks like I failed to notice a name in the search/find box filtering the data.
    My Bad.
    But it does bring up the question of how to restore various backups of projects and events of Final Cut Pro X.
       Dave

  • Create Smart Collection for Photos Without Lens Profile Applied?

    The subject pretty much says it all. Is there any way to create a smart collection of photos that have not had lens profile corrections applied?

    Sadly, it's not possible using the options avilable within Lr's Smart Collection dialog. However, some third party plugins might be able to do it, although I'm not aware of any.

  • Smart collections appearing in wrong catalog

    I have three seperate catalogs on my desktop, each with different collections, clients etc. Generally I'll use 'import from another catalog' when I want to import a new shoot from my laptop. This works great, however sometimes I find that all of my smart collections from another catalog suddenly appear in the catalog that I am using e.g I'm using my Sculpture catalog, I import a new sculpture shoot. It imports and shows up fine but so does 20 smart collections from my Portfolio catalog. The 'alien' Portfolio smart collections obviously show as holding 0 images (as the images are where they should be - in the Portfolio catalog). Is it something to do with a preference file that all catalogs access?

    I broke my catalogs up because I had two specific clients that I wanted to keep seperate because my folders systems got a bit confused and I could get my head around it all better. Also I thought I had too many images in one catalog (I've got 136,746 images at present). Anyway I have joined them together again and am enjoying the ease of finding everything. However I still have another 'shoot' catalog on my laptop which I use both for tethered shooting and for lecturing which is still giving me problems. I have just exported a shoot as a catalog and imported it into my laptop/shoot catalog to show to students tomorrow and again it has carried collections over from the host catalog. It's really annoying to have to delete all the empty collections. Maybe if I just import the raws without the editing it won't do it, but don't really want to have to re-edit everything....

  • LrPhoto:getContainedPublishedCollections() to work with Smart Collection

    I have customized the original flickr publish plugin to suit my liking and to model the behavior of Flickr especially the Photostream and Photosets concept. I love the improve plugin i created very much. When I started to work with smart collections to publish my photos to flickr.most of the functionality and behavior of flickr I had created breakdown as I rely heavily on LrPhoto:getContainedPublishedCollections() to interconnect each photoset (collection). Apparently this function doesn't work with smart collection. My question would be
    1. For the next update of lightroom, I hope to see the function LrPhoto:getContainedPublishedCollections() to also work with Smart Collections.
    2. For the time being is there any alternative way to reference smart collections from a LrPhoto?
    Thank you very much..

    Hi lawren,
    I am give u info what i know...
    T-code : smartform.
    Parts of smartforms
    1) global settings- form attributes  : which will contain header data.
                                  form interface  : parameters that are required to generate function module.
                                  global data: here we can create type and data.
    2)pages and windows : without main window we cant creat a page.
        main window
        secondary window 
        copies window
        final window
    3)smart style   :     paragraph format and charcter format
    looks like Most of them is navigation ....

  • Smart collection and folder names with "_"

    I have problems when making Smart Collections based on folder names
    My folder name is 2009_11_20 Mist
    When I make a Smart collection with "Folder" Stars with 2009
    I get a lot of files
    When I change the  2009 to 2009_11 I get no files. Even when I make 2009_ I get no files
    When I change the 2009 to Mist and the "Starts with" to "Contains" again I get the desired files.
    When I change the 2009 to 2009_11 and the "Starts with" to "Contains" again I get no files.
    It seems that LR with Smart Collections cannot handle the "_" character???
    Who can help?

    It's a bug. The usual workaround is to use hyphen as the separator in your folder names instead of an underscore.

  • Criteria in smart collection relevant for non-photo formats?

    How does one set criteria when creating smart collection that are relevant for non-photo files (or, better yet, extend it to the full range of metadata in the file info panels).

    A collection is just an address of the image.  So if the item has a file location would think you can use it.  Of course metadata has no address.

  • When developing an image from a smart collection "has no adjustments" it gets immediately deselected

    I am wondering if this could really be the intended LR behaviour?
    I start from a smart collection, one of the criteria is "has no adjustments".
    Ok, as soon as I move the first slider in develop module, it no longer matches that criterion.
    But that should be no reason for LR to force me to immediately stop the develop edits on the selected image.
    It immediately unselects, and I stay in Develop module with a grey window and the message "no image selected". (It does not move on to the next image, which still matches the criterion.)
    I would expect that when I return to Library module, it would return to the same smart collection where I started, but I would not find my last developed images there, as they no longer match the criterion.
    But that LR grabs it immediately out of my develop selection?
    Strange enough it stays the same, when I first explicitely selected all images while in Library/smart collection.
    My expectation would be that I  have this selection fixed to work on in Develop module. Similar to when I select any images from survey view and go to Develop module.
    But no, the only workaround I found is:
    Start from the smart collection, ctrl a to select all, then arbitrarily click on another collection withput this criterion - selection stays fixed - then move over to Develop module.
    This is LR4.1 on Win7.
    Definitely my functional specification would be: never take off an image from Develop unless the user moves on to another image.
    So ignore from where an image was picked.
    Would you consider this a bug? Or a "feature"?
    Do you see the same in LR4.2 or 4.3RC? Behaviour on a Mac?
    Cornelia

    There is a feature request that has been around for a long time to be able to "lock" the contents of a smart collection so you can work on the photos in it, before "releasing" it for recomputed contents.
    My workaround is to copy from smart collection to dumb (I encountered this so often that I created a 1-keystroke plugin mini-feature to help). Before that I actually used a private keyword whose presence was enough to hold a photo in a smart collection (set the keyword to work on photos, clear the keyword to release them). Then as long as you add that keyword as criteria to every smart collection you may edit in, and add the keyword to every photo in the collection that you may work on... - yuck.

  • When editing an image in ps from a lr 4.2 smart collections image not shown back in smart collection

    Hi all,
    I have noticed at LR 4.2, that if you edit an image of a smart collection using PS (edit in PS function threw LR) and then save, the image is not appearing in the specific smart collection. Instead  image appears in the parent folder from where the smart collections retrieves images.
    Has anyone notice that as well??
    Forgot to mention that my parent folder with files is a collection created with virtual copies of seleveted files. If i edit in Photoshop directly threw this virtual copies collection then the files appears in smart collections as well. but if i edit in PS directly from smart collections then files dont appear into smart collections neither at the virtual copies collection!!

    "obviously you use virtual copies when creating those collections" - why? It seems to me that this just increases the number of images in your Library for no benefit, unless you want to independently edit  the two image versions, one inside the Event collection and one outside the collection. If you ever wanted to see an unedited version of a particular image, LR retains the history (and before/after view) needed to show that, within the single thumbnail.
    It is not necessary to make a Smart Collection in order to show only picked images from a particular event. You can use a Filter to show just the picked images and hide the rest. That means you can work inside the collection, and that means that when you edit an image to PS, the new LR version WILL inherit the collection membership as well as the Pick status, and therefore will immediately show next to the image it is based on.
    I think this is going to be simpler and easier - BTW you don't have to go back to Library Grid view in order to apply filters, only in order to configure them in the first place. By saving Filter presets with a name, you can then select between these directly [from the menu at the right end of the Filmstrip] while you work, even in Develop- for example, "no filter", "picked", "unpicked", "rated two or more", whatever you want. Also you can switch between the recently-viewed collections and folders [from a menu when you click on the image details text toward the left end of the Filmstrip], to change the underlying content of the Filmstrip, to which you are applying these filters.
    By "using selection criteria other than membership in a manual collection", I just meant: a special keyword, or a particular folder, or some combination of such things. But if you prefer to put images into a Collection, you can just use that directly and IMO you don't need the SC.
    I personally like to have some kind of sufficiently identifying keywords on the image anyway, so that Exported copies will also show this information automatically... since an exported image will not reveal what collection its master image belonged to, that classification alone is not enough IMO.

  • Cannot any longer save new smart collections

    Hi, after reinstalling Photoshop CS6 I cannot any longer save smart collections in Bridge. Always I want to create a smart collection by entering criteria, but when I click on SAVE, it is not saved. After some time of waiting, I always have to cancel, to close the pop-up window that should allow me to save the new smart collection. In my old installation (before I had to install a new hard disk), setting up and saving smart collections never was a problem.
    ALL updates of CS6 have been installed. And I am under WINDOWS 7. Version of CS6 is: 13.01 x64
    Before, I used a regular hard disk for the system, now I have a SSD, plus several hard disks for data storage.
    Can anybody help me with advice what the problem is?
    That whould be great. Thanx,
    Jochen

    There is also a Bridge Forum you can search ans ask in Bridge General Discussion

  • Smart Collection Filtering Problem

    I have set-up identical smart collections in both Bridge and Lightroom 2.4.
    In Bridge I have a Keyword called "Collages" and a sub-keyword (under Collages) called "Story Bridge".
    In Bridge there are some images where I have only clicked on the sub-keyword "Story Bridge" (and not Callages). There are other images where I select the keyword "Collages" as well as sub-keyword "Story Bridge".
    In Bridge I then set-up a smart collection that filters for both "Collages" and "Story Bridge". Both must be in the keywords for the image. This filters correctly ie the images that were only keyworded as "Story Bridge" are not included in the collection.
    I then go to Lightroom and synchronise the relevant folders so all keywords in Bridge are brought into Lightroom.
    I then set-up exactly the same Smart Collection that must have both "Collages" and "Story Bridge" as their keywords. This time Lightroom also includes all images that were only keyworded with "Story Bridge". Why is this so? I only want the images that have both "Collages" and "Story Bridge" in their keywords but I now also get the images with just "Story Bridge" as their keyword.
    I have selected "Match all of the following rules" and added 2 rules for "Collages" and "Story Bridge".
    In Bridge I get the correct filtered images but in Lightroom, with the same rules, I get all images with "Collages" or "Story Bridge" as keywords.
    I have attached the smart collection filter dialogue boxes for both Bridge and Lightroom.
    Any help would be appreciated.

    I suspect that we will see these differences go away in time. Bridge is part of the Creative Suite and Photoshop family and codebase. Lightroom, while part of the Photoshop family, was a whole new approach with an entirely different codebase. Over time we'll see more convergence and various aspects of the applications will operate similarly.
    I'm sure it's a monumental task for the teams at Adobe to coordinate all these moving pieces and features. Who knows what LR 3.0 and CS5 will bring to the table!

  • Adobe Bridge CC Smart Collections are not displaying all images in the folder

    I'm having an issue with Bridge CC were I setup a smart collection to monitor my new photos. The folder contains over 300 photos, but is only displaying 160. The only condition I set is to have a minium file size of 10kb, so it should bring in all files since most are over 4mb. At first I thought it was a problem with the files themselves (permissions or something) but if I open the folder in bridge it easily displays all of the images easily. Any ideas?

    I'm having an issue with Bridge CC were I setup a smart collection to monitor my new photos.
    You might want to describe this workflow a bit more. Do you create this from an existing folder or are you adding new photo's?
    A Smart Collection does not refreshes it self automatically. You either have to use the edit icon top right of the content panel to save again or deselect and select the collection itself to let it refresh the content.

  • After reinstalling Photoshop PS6 I cannot any longer save smart collections in Bridge

    Hi, after reinstalling Photoshop PS6 I cannot any longer save smart collections in Bridge. I create a smart collection by entering criteria, but when I click on SAVE, it is not saved. In my old installation (before I had to install a new hard disk), that never was a problem.
    I am using Windows 7. Before, I used a hrad disk for the system, now I have a SSD, plus seveal hard disks for data storage.
    Can anybody help me with advice what the problem is?
    That whould be great. Thanx,
    Jochen

    There is also a Bridge Forum you can search ans ask in Bridge General Discussion

Maybe you are looking for

  • Importing Word 2007  documents: linked images getting duplicated!

    If I import a Word 2007 document (.docx) to a page in Dreamweaver CS4, either by File-> import or drag and drop, images (in the /web_images folder) for which I have already inserted hyperlinks in the Word document, are getting duplicated and the link

  • Let's test and compare..... G5 vs. Inte

    I'm wondering if anyone is running 7.2 on a intel Mac yet? I would love to hear how the intel chip performs w/ Logic compared to the G5. Also I think it would be a great idea if someone w/ the know how and capability could post a Logic prodject song

  • Compressor 2.3 Unexpectedly Quits Upon Batch Submission

    Compressor quits upon batch submission when exporting a sequence/file from the FCP bin and also when dragging a file into the ui from the finder. I have already tried the following fixes without any success: Following the compressor KB article on how

  • How to buy a monthly licence for illustrator?

    I'd like to buy a temporary licence for Illustrator CC. Some weeks ago I sow a monthly license (about 36 dollars or euros, I don't remember); the licence I sow didn't contemplate an yearly fee and it could be interrupted in any moment. Does anybody k

  • Gracefully exit from a Linux kill

    Is there a way to gracefully exit from a Linux kill command? Given the following code:   public static void main(String[] args) throws IOException     boolean bExit = false;     while (!bExit)       try         Thread.sleep(1000L);       catch (Inter