Anyone have any compatibility issues with existing software?

Specifically, Adobe Lightroom and Photoshop 6? Last time I updated Mac OSX, I had all kinds of issues with the plugins for Lightroom and Photoshop, but I think that was more to do with going from 32 bit to 64 bit. I'm sure Mountiain Lion is still 64 bit, but I'm  reluctant to update. Anyone have any issues after upgrading?

A client of mine used to have a fibrejet network. Still do but now they use it for archive only-- deep storage.
As I recall, there was some limitation as to the number of users who could have write privileges at the same time. All users could read all the time, but only one I believe could write at one time.
Don't take this as gospel because I'm old and forgetful. And grumpy.

Similar Messages

  • Are there any compatibility issues with Captivate and OS X Yosemite?

    Has anyone noted any compatibility issues with Captivate and Yosemite?

    I had the same issue. Updating resolved this as well.
    I tested with Captivate 7 and almost everything seemed to work fine. I tested with an existing project file containing TEB's, Motion recording, a third party drag 'n drop widget, and a playbar with a TOC. This all seemed to work fine both in preview mode as after publishing. I also tested with Captivate 6 although I didn't publish anything. Here, everything seemed to work fine as well. However this was only SWF.
    As jpm226 described for 8, previewing HTML5 doesn't seem to work with Captivate 6 and 7 either. Chrome gives a "This webpage is not available" notification. Publishing however, does seems to work.
    Fortunately, the client we work for that asks us to use Captivate 7, also asks for SWF output. So I'll continue to use Yosemite for now.

  • I am frequently unable to join the internet or it runs very slowly.  I have a Time Capsule in my LAN. Are there any compatibility issues with Time Capsules and any ISPs?

    I am frequently unable to join the internet or, if I can, it is exceptionally slow. The ISP says nothing is wrong ontheir end.  Are there any compatibility issues with any ISPs when using Time Capsule and/or iMacs?

    Tried this several times to no avail.  I believe it is the ISP causing the problem...Time Warner.

  • Are there any compatibility issues with Sonos and Airport extreme??

    are there any compatibility issues with Sonos and Airport extreme??

    Sonos uses its own priopietory wireless protocol SonosNet to distribute audio data among all its products, thus it should not affect other network devices which use standard WiFi 802.11a/b/g/n protocol at all though they may share the same radio channel for wirless signaling.
    On my dual-band (5 GHz / 2.4 GHz) Airport Extreme staion, I select the option "802.11n Only (5GHz) - 802.11n (2.4GHz)" and turn on "Use wide channels" in Wireless configuration in order to use only 802.11n protocol and more radio channels to achieve maximum wireless bandwidth of 400 Mbps. This bandwidth is necessary for quick Time Machine backup to NAS connected to the Airport Extreme station through Ethernet cable. So my iMac and MacBook Pro always connected to the Airport Extreme through 5 GHz radio channel with 802.11n protocol whereas my iPhone 4S always connected through 2.4 GHz radio channel with the same protocol.
    In my living room Sonos ZP-90 (same as new CONNECT model) zone player is connected to Airport Extreme directly through Ethernet cable (recommended by Sonos) and Sonos S5 (same as new PLAY:5 model) zone player in bedroom is connected wirelessly through SonosNet protocol to the ZP-90 zone player in living room.
    These devices are in operation simutaneouly most of the time. Music is playing through the Sonos ZP90/S5 zone players througout the day, I am streaming viedo through Internet (fibre broadband 25 Mbps) on my MacBook Pro in bedroom or iMac in living room or reading news on my iPhone. So far so good and have no encounter any interference problem for about three years. Further more bandwidth for 802.11n protocol does not seem to be affected at all.
    In fact with a low power Fujitsu USB drive (2.5" / 500 GB, designed for notebook) plug into USB port of Airport Extreme, it can be used as NAS drive for Sonos music distribution system without any problem. Just transfer all files from Music folder in my home directory on iMac into this NAS drive and set it up as music source in "Manage > Music Library Settings" in Sonos Controller for Mac application will do. Though the same drive can be served as Time Machine's backup disk as well, an independent full-fledged NAS drive for Sonos and Time Machine backup is better long-term solution for reliability and performance. With the NAS configured as sole music source, you do not need to keep any computer powered on all the time in order to play music through the Sonos system.

  • Are there ANY compatibility issues with Itunes 12.0.1 and Mavericks?  Don't want to download Yosemite.  Not hearing good things about it.

    Are there ANY compatibility issues with Itunes 12.0.1 and Mavericks?  Don't want to download Yosemite.  Not hearing good things about it.  I'm on Mavericks 10.9.5.

    one obstacle, quickly removed. thank you.
    nomenclature aside for a moment, 10.6.8 is correct but maybe more is necessary about the MacBook Pro: it is 'old': Identifier: 1.2, Intel Core Duo, 2.16 GHz, 1 Processor, L2 2 MB, RAM 2 GB.
    i hope that is enough to get an answer to this: is it unadvisable to update its OS; in other words, if i update to 10.9, will the machine be able to handle it, 'speedwise'?

  • Need 256 Bit AES Full Disk Encryption for a Mac.  The other discussions regarding this issue are very old.  Does anyone have any current advice regarding encryption software?

    Does anyone have any advice regarding 256 bit full disk encryption software for Macs?  The other discussions on the topic are years old, so I would like some current input.  Thanks for your help in advance.

    Depending on your Mac, you might not want to upgrade to OS X 10.7 or 10.8 as it will not run the PowerPC based software your currently using costing a bundle to replace it all, also they will slow down your machine if it's not a more recent issue. You don't want to upgrade OS X without AppleCare defending your possibly bricked logicboard that's for sure.
    Filevault encrypts the boot drive, however in doing so makes it near impossible to fix if you have a software issue and need to recover files directly or by using specialty software. Also it robs the machine of performance even more than the Lions do. So you will really need a SSD to work best with 10.7/10.8 and Filevault, then it has to be freshly installed. Filevault needs 50% free space on the boot drive, then it's going to write to the slower 50% half of the hard drive where performance is terrible compared to the first 50%.
    Also Filevault is cracked under certain conditions, and if someone gets their hands on the machine (like the law) and knows what they are doing.
    If you take your Filevaulted machine to Apple to fix, they are going to require the password to fix the machine obviously.
    Software based encryption is vulnerable, you might want to instead place your sensitive data on external self-encrypting hardware that doesn't rely upon software or computer hacks/bypasses (ike freezing the RAM) to get to it.
    http://www.datalocker.com/products/datalocker-dl3.html
    Iron Keys for portable USB self encryption, both work with any computer, so your not locked into one platform.
    With the senstive data off the computer and on a external device, there is the option of removing, hiding and securing the device. If used with a computer that's never connected to the Internet, it's safe from snoopers, except from a survelliance van parked outside your door.

  • Seagate ST8000AS0002 8TB 5900RPM 128MB Cache SATA3 - for Backup Data Only. Are there any compatibility issues with an older  3,1 Apple Mac Pro 8-Core 2.8GHz (4-Core x 2) ?

    Finally mass storage drives are being released. The Seagate ST8000AS0002 8.0 TB 5900RPM has just been released in Australia and I was advised to check on any compatibility issues, being that my 3,1 Mac Pro is an old, but working fine machine.
    I have read there are possible issues with using HDs greater than 2TB with the MP 3,1 . But checking with OWC, they say the Seagate 4.0 TB Solid State Hybrid Drive is compatible for use with the MP 3,1.
    So can the hardware and operating system handle an 8.0 TB of this sort ?

    The problem is with formatting the large disk. The Mac can see and use them if formatted for a Mac
    Format large disks
    That bug appeared in 10.8.4, and has not yet been fixed.
    using a Disk Utility from any older Mac OS X, including the 10.6 DVD (if your Mac can boot from it) or any saved Installer DVD or thumb drive will work.
    Another work-around is to move that drive to an external enclosure and Erase it there (provided your enclosure is modern enough to deal with drives over 2.2TB.

  • Any compatibility issues with two X-Fi cards installed on the same syst

    I'll give you a breif background on what I'm doing. I run an internet radio show, and I require three soundcards to be installed in my system. I am current running:
    SB X-Fi (Non fatalty, but the full-size board)
    SB Audigy2 ZS
    Onboard Realtek
    In the above configuration, all the soundcards are happy with each other and not bothered by each others drivers. However, I am currently toying with the idea of replacing the Audigy2ZS with an SB X-Fi Fatalty. Here's the issue, will the Normal X-Fi and Fatalty X-Fi drivers have any compatiblity issues? I dont believe they use the same software, so seperate drivers would have to be installed. With the Audigy card currently in the system, I never had to install any drivers for it as I think they cam with SP2 or something and my system automatically recognizes it with (WDM) next to it's name in device manager. I would just like to confirm this before I purchase the X-Fi Fatality.
    Last question: What about another X-Fi (Non Fatalty) that uses the same exact driver that's currently installed in my system for my other X-fi. Would there be any issues with that?

    I actually dont have any trouble with the mode switching right now, it works great. That's actually why I'm buying the second X-fi, so I have the ability to switch modes with the different cards. I'm not using the software that came on the CD, but the updated drivers off of the web, and there is a drop down box to change which card you want to set settings for. What issues should I be looking out for?

  • Does anyone have any suggestions about what genealogy software is best?  I have a Mac Pro

    I am working on researching and documenting my family tree.  Does anyone have any suggestions as to the best software to use on my Mac Pro?

    Check the App Store, the online & your local AS as well as MacUpdate & Mac resellers.  Google search also. 

  • Are there any compatability issues with V6 and Norton 360 as there have been in the past?

    When I last tried to upgrade to a newer version, a number of my Norton 360 features would not function and I got a popup message saying that there was some sort of compatability problem. I've subsequently had to go back to V4.

    Ne there aren't any "issues" with Norton. Norton released a compatibility patch for Firefox 6 last Tuesday, a couple of hours after Firefox 6 was released.
    http://community.norton.com/t5/Norton-360/Update-Available-Firefox-6-0-Compatibility-Patch/td-p/512484

  • Are there any compatibility issues with Mavericks and EMC Celerra File shares, particularly with the SMB protocols?

    Our company uses a EMC Celerra file share, but most of our users are Windows based. We have a small production department of 7 macs. Starting with Snow Leopard, we noticed some issues with SMB. We were able to resolve those issues, but had to wait to upgrade to Lion because there were additional SMB or permissions concerns with the Celerra file share and Lion. Now, we are again waiting to upgrade to Mavricks because of the way it handles user permissions. Does anyone using Mavericks now also connect to a EMC Celerra file share? Thanks! 

    Our company uses a EMC Celerra file share, but most of our users are Windows based. We have a small production department of 7 macs. Starting with Snow Leopard, we noticed some issues with SMB. We were able to resolve those issues, but had to wait to upgrade to Lion because there were additional SMB or permissions concerns with the Celerra file share and Lion. Now, we are again waiting to upgrade to Mavricks because of the way it handles user permissions. Does anyone using Mavericks now also connect to a EMC Celerra file share? Thanks! 

  • Are there any compatibility issues with AirPort Extreme 802.11n and Maverick OS X

    Are there any reported issues?

    Welcome,
    The only issue is that the "old" Airport Utility (5.6/5.6.1) doesn't work with Maverics and you have to use the 6.3.2 version.
    Having said that I use it with 6 AP (mixture of AX's and XE 2s) just fine with over 20 devices hanging off them and all Mac on Maverics.
    It may depend on which Airports you have, if they are supported by the new Utility you should be fine, as ever YMMV!
    Regards,
    Shawn

  • Any compatibility issues with IE8 for STVN 2.1 Orgchart?

    Hi Experts,
    Just curious if there are any issues with running IE8 compatibility mode for Nakisa STVN 2.1 Orgchart?
    Thanks,
    Michael Dinh

    Hi Michael,
    IE8 Compatibility Mode is fine for use with STVN2.1 applications. As Stephen said, IE7 and IE8 are certified for SVSN3.0 but IE6 support has been discontinued.
    Best regards,
    Luke

  • Dreamweaver CC may have a compatibility Issue with Dreamweaver CS6?

    I installed Dreamweaver CC onto my laptop (Windows 7 OS).  I am able to build new web pages using Fluid Grid Layout.  But when I attempt to open previously designed web pages that were build using Dreamweaver CS6, Dreamweaver CC crashes.
    I was told today, in Chat, by Technical Support, that it was a compatibility issue between Dreamweaver CC and Dreamweaver CS6 (for Fluid Grid).  Can this be confirmed?  I have no problems going back and rebuilding previously designed Fluid Grid web pages.  I just want to know that there is no fix/work around available?

    Hi Norv56,
    I was alerted of this issue today. Would it be possible for you to send us your files for investigation? It would be difficult for us to investigate without those.
    Thanks,
    Preran

  • Will I find any compatibility issues with 3.1 v. 3.5 v. 4.0

    I will be working with some special test equipment and on the test console computer it will be running TestStand 3.1.  Some of the poeple that will be developing testscripts from my group have version 3.5 and some have version 4.0.  We will be developing the code on our own machines and then integrating the code to the console. Will we run into any problems with the different versions?
    Eventually the console will be upgraded to 4.1.  Will we run into problems then when the console is upgraded with all the work we would have done in version 4.0, 3.5 and 3.1?
    We have the same problems with CVI the console will be using version 7.1.1, we have 8.6 and 8.2 at our desks.  Will we see any problems there?

    Dusty,
    When you upgrade all of your sequence files should still run as they did in 3.1, but the only way to know for sure is to try it out. If you are planning on upgrading it may be easier to go ahead and try that sooner than later, If you want to develop on a 4.1 system and save down to different versions, as Ray pointed out you will not be able to use features that aren't available in 3.1, so all of your systems' features will be restricted. If you wanted to know what changed between 3.1 and now, here is a quick run-down:
    What Is New In TestStand 3.1
    What Is New In TestStand 3.5
    What Is New In TestStand 4.0
    What Is New In TestStand 4.1
    If you upgraded your system now, you wouldn't have to worry about using any incompatable features. Since you plan on upgrading in the future, is there any reason you don't want to do it right now? Also, if you plan on keeping this system around, if you stay on our SSP plan, you get every update to TestStand as it comes out in addition to full access to phone support, that way you can upgrade from version to version, and make upgrading easier, rather than having to jump multiple versions at a time. 
    Richard S -- National Instruments --Applications Engineer -- Data Acquisition with TestStand

Maybe you are looking for