Anyone useing an SSD Drive in a Mac Pro? Should it be Sata? or pci..can it be bootable?

The Title says it all!
But to recap, I would like an SSD boot drive for my 3,1 power Mac.....I can get SSD drives in PCE or SATA configuration, which would work better?
Thanks for any info
Jim

EIDE or PATA hasn't been used and of course is way too slow.
SSDs today are "too fast" for the SATA II we have so you don't need SATA 3, SATA II is still hitting the wall with an SSD.
You do know that yours should get 250MB/sec but being small you need to cut down on what you store on your boot drive and use other drives for meda and data.
SATA 3 SSDs can deliver up to 500MB/sec which again is getting close to the max bandwidth of 700MB/sec that the controller chip used in the Mac Pro is capable of, which is shared by all 4 drive bays.
Many users stick the SSD in the lower optical drive bay. Very convenient. I can't remember if you have an SATA optical drive though or they still used EIDE.

Similar Messages

  • How can I use an SSD in a 2006 Mac Pro 1,1 2.66Ghz

    Hi everyone,
    I'm trying to work out how to use my new SSD in an old 2006 MacPro. Bear with me, I'm not an expert and trying to work out what is best for me.
    I recently bought a 1TB Samsung SSD 840EVO to use in my old Mac Pro, not to use as my main machine, but as a network slave to save RAM with sound sample libraries.
    I also got an Apricorn SATA III Velocity Solo x2 - Extreme Performance SSD Upgrade Kit to get high speeds
    http://www.apricorn.com/products/desktop-ssd-hdd-upgrade-kits/vel-solox2.html?gc lid=CLOi46bvqMICFVGCMgodPG8AdA
    After installing the HD using the SATAIII connector in a PCIe slot, I did a hard drive test and realised I could only get about 160mbps, not 300-500mpbs which I think the SSD should run at. I had my friend test it on his machine too, and we realised the problem is the "Link Width" which says "x1" and not "x4" or something, so that the speed isn't running at full speed.
    So apparently it's not compatable.
    Apparently what I CAN do is install it in a regular Hard Drive bay with a sled, which will be SATA II ... will that work?
    I think I can use this: http://www.amazon.com/Mac-Pro-2006-2008-Sled-Drives/dp/B00AN55034
    Anyway - is this what I should be doing to get the fastest available connection?
    Any advice would be great- thanks!!!

    SATA II is generally just fine, no fuss no muss, for the system. Using PCIe to boot adds problems and most if not all such PCIe SSD cards do NOT WORK in 32-bit Mac Pro 1,1 and 2,1 (and the 3,1 is also sometimes difficult with some cards).
    Data uses though are useful, work, and benefit. Lightroom, Aperture, scratch, even iPhoto - all those graphic libraries.
    I would rewrite and make it "will the native SATA II drive bays" work, and the answer to that is YES. But not faster.
    You have a 4x and 8x slot, so one of those is fine.
    It is the reads and zero latency seeks along with queue depth and high 90K IOs per sec that help an SSD shine.
    Putting a 250GB or 500GB EVO 840 is the easiest and best return on system improvement you can make for $120-240 (plus $14 for Icy Dock adapter).
    Even the 2008 has two 4x PCIe 1.1 slots. The 2009 has PCIe 4x 2.1 slots that share bandwidth and cap out (only learned from stripping SSDs using two PCIe cards and 2-4 SSDs), so they aren't perfect either! ONLY the 5,1 really has the best PCIe design and setup.
    Sonnet only supports or recommends their Tempo Pro which is what I bought, so I don't know off hand how well yours works and if it even will. Some cards do require EFI 64-bit, AND 10.8.x or later, and maybe even PCIe 2.0 - but only to work, ie they don't work or not supported in PCIe 1.0... but NOT about the bandwidth.
    Booting in 10 seconds is nice. Launching a full dozen apps in 10 seconds (and ready to use) also. Only larger program suites takes 20 seconds now.
    250MB/sec is nothing to sneeze at when it comes to boot drive SSD.

  • Can i use my G5 drive in the Mac Pro?

    Hi.
    I have a 2005 G5 with a western digital serial ata drive with all my audio on it.
    I also have an airport card which id like to put in the mac pro.
    Can i put them in my new mac pro which i should get in the next few days?
    Im not sure if there is a faster airport now and i should buy that?
    Cheers, Benji

    Sometimes it is okay, but in the end, you are much better off to clone the drive, erase format so it has a GUID partition scheme. Really.
    As for 4 yr old WD drive, keep it for an emergency boot drive or something. I'd say put it in USB/FW case but not everything is happy in FW land lately. Pick up some new SATA drives, they are more than 2x faster, and $100 for 1TB.

  • Anyone Using An SSD Drive for Audio Yet?

    Been thinking about one of these for my record drive, since a very small one would work for me (as I'm only working on a few songs at any given moment and have plenty of other space to store things). It's between this and getting a V Raptor drive but I love the idea of no moving parts...
    Any input appreciated..
    TH

    Mike Connelly wrote:
    For audio recording, the concern is that SSDs have a lower number of write cycles than traditional hard drives. It's hard to know with such a new category of product, but they may fail faster in a situation where they are being written over and over very often.
    This is a much bigger issue for system disks than for audio recording. Audio deals with relatively large files, and once they're written, they generally stay there until the project is dumped off-disk.
    The system, on the other hand, constantly reads/writes/re-writes tiny blocks of data all over the place - which is also why random read/write rates are EVERYTHING in performance, and sequential read/write speeds, while certainly impressive, are pretty much irrelevant in actual use.
    Also, all SSDs use a kind of "load balancing" to make sure that writes are evenly distributed across the entire memory, resulting in lifespans far beyond anything you'd reasonably expect off a mechanical hard drive.
    Further reading (everything you need to know):
    http://www.anandtech.com/storage/showdoc.aspx?i=3531
    http://anandtech.com/storage/showdoc.aspx?i=3631
    Message was edited by: spheric

  • G5 Hard drives in a Mac pro?

    Can I use G5 Hard drives in a Mac pro?
    One user on this thread says yes
    https://discussions.apple.com/message/15274834#15274834
    but this KB article says, "The hard drives must meet the following specifications: Type: SATA 3 Gbps..."
    http://manuals.info.apple.com/en_US/MacPro_HardDrive_DIY.pdf
    I'm pretty sure the SATA drives in the G5 are not 3 Gbps
    Any problem with this?  (Other than the older drives being slower)
    Thanks
    DLS

    Backward compatible.
    You can use SATA III/6G drives also, though the bus controller is limited to SATA II.
    Those are all specifications, nothing more.
    And don't use jumpers. If you used jumpers before, because the G5 (most, though the G5 Quad had SATA II support), you might need to remove it. Some G5s only really supported SATA 1.0 and before SATA II or even SATA was really finalized (most drives were barely even legally SATA).
    Caught people off-guard, so un-Apple like to adopt something new so quickly.
    now people are hoping and waiting for more bandwidth and better support for SATA III, to take advantage of SSDs and 6G.

  • SSD & HDD 2 drive format query Mac Pro 3.1

    Hi
    Can't seem to get a straight answer to this question anywhere else so am turning to anyone here that can help.
    I currently have my original 320 gig drive in my Mac Pro 3.1.
    I want to add an SSD and format it so that its the boot drive and contains the programs and nothing else.  The 320 gig drive will house all the 'other stuff' (photos, vids etc)
    I don't want to migrate anything over - I basically want to start with two empty drives - SSD for boot and programs and 320 Gig drive for stuff.
    I just want to know the best practice for this.  Do I have to wipe 320 gig first as its currently the boot, then add SSD in to the computer.  Do one at a time?  Both together?  I've been used to having one hard drive all these years and am having problems working out best way to do.
    I've asked elsewhere and people keep telling me to migrate stuff over from the 320 Gig drive. I don't want to do this - I want to start with two fresh drives and put everything back on manually (tedious, I know, but thats the way I want to do it)
    Any help in this matter greatly appreciated
    Craig

    you want simple? just buy a 500GB $225 Samsung EVO
    http://www.amazon.com/Samsung-2-5-Inch-Internal-MZ-75E500B-AM/dp/B00OBRE5UE/
    There use to be, and still can be, reasons to split the OS and apps from the data drives.
    You want speed, then even SATA III with 500MB/sec read/writes, or XP941 with 900MB/sec writes, and 1000MB/sec reads cannot be beat. And you could not fit data onto or justify the cost when an SSD was too small and when 500GB cost $1500.
    SSD Blade Drive for "Classic" Mac Pro
    Most PCIe cards costs $79-299 and add a level of complexity that the XP941 adapter does not though.
    But you do this all the time, but just never had a dedicated system boot drive before. When 15K SCSI drives were small and fast and ideal, and higher cost, the whole idea of using cheaper drives for data came to desktop. It was used already before then on other systems for years.
    Using the drive bays, SATA II and 250MB/sec is still an improvement. But even new 4TB drives are 150MB/sec and above. Back when 320GB drives were used they were not even able to achieve 100MB/sec, more like 80MB/sec. And SSD has a lot of other benefits. So yes today's SSD will make a difference.
    I would just clone to 500GB SSD and try it! your last clean install was less than a year ago and yet still using older drives that are slow. Small SSDs have not without firmware and controller changes in the last two years able to perform as fast as the 250GB and larger. Larger SSD, more channels. An SSD has 4 channels on 128GB but 8 channels on 250GB which can all act simultaneous and concurrently to shovel I/O. Plus near-zero seeks and access times, and 90,000+ I/Os per second.
    128GB $80 will work and make a difference though if price is the main concern and not speed. Also, with an SSD free unused space is more important. A deleted file is not "deleted" and the SSD "page" (NAND) is not freed up until it is trimmed.

  • SSD Blade Drive for "Classic" Mac Pro

    Repost of earlier thread.
    PCIe-SSD which surpass SATA III speeds can mean a lot, and for a 1,1 is the only way to boot from PCIe (whether SATA III or not).
    http://www.macintouch.com/readerreports/harddrives/index.html#d17feb2015
    Samsung XP941 256GB PCIe 2.0 x4 M.2 SSD MZHPU256HCGL
    M.2 Interface: PCIe Gen2 5Gb/s, up to 4 lanes
    512MB LPDDR2 DRAM Buffer Memory
    Support TRIM Command
    Sequential Read: 1080MB/s, Sequential Write: 800 MB/s,
    Random Read (QD=32): 120K IOPS, Random Write (QD=32): 60K IOPS
    Works with (all)  Mac Pro. Not compatible with the MacBook Air or Retina MacBook Pro
    http://www.amazon.com/Samsung-XP941-256GB-PCIe-MZHPU256HCGL/dp/B00J9V53M6/
    A smaller XP941 128GB that 'only' gets 450MB/sec writes instead of the 800-900MB/sec
    http://www.amazon.com/NGFF-PCI-Express-SATA-Adapter/dp/B00M8HC5JC/
    Lycom DT-120 M.2 PCIe to PCIe 3.0 x4 Adapter (Support M.2 PCIe 2280, 2260, 2242)
    http://www.amazon.com/dp/B00MYCQP38/
    http://barefeats.com/hard183.html
    SATA Express meets the ( '09 ) MacPro - Bootable NGFF PCIE SSD
    http://forums.macrumors.com/showthread.php?t=1685821
    http://www.engadget.com/2015/01/08/samsung-sm941-pcie-ssd/
    Next generation from Samsung:
    http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20150106006600/en/Samsung-Electronics-Mass -Producing-Extremely-Fast-Low-powered#.VOO5NoI5CUk

    RAM City http://www.ramcity.com.au
    Provides support and adapters for use with various M.2 blade SSD drives
    Samsung XP941 512GB M.2 PCIe x4 80mm SSD
    Quote:
    When combined with a M.2 to PCIe adapter, the Samsung XP941 provides class-leading storage performance in desktop machines and is also fully bootable in all cMP Mac Pro models (2006-2012, excluding the 'tube' model). See the table at the bottom of this page for approximate throughput figures.
      * * * W A R N I N G * * * *
    Do not run Parted Magic's secure erase on this drive. It will render it useless and void the warranty.
    Secure Erase will brick the XP941.
    https://www.ramcity.com.au/blog/how-to-install-windows-8.1-on-the-samsung-xp941- ss/138296
    To use this SSD in a desktop machine or cMP Mac Pro (all 2006-2012 models prior to the current cylindrical shaped one), you will need a free PCIe slot, and an M.2 to PCIe adapter. Booting is supported in the Mac Pro.
    Note, system boot on Windows desktop PC's is only supported on certain Z97 and X99 chipset-based motherboards with built-in M.2 sockets. Booting with the XP941 is not currently supported in a Windows PC with the XP941 drive in conjunction with the adapter , but it works perfectly without drivers as a storage drive.
    Review our M.2 SSD compatibility list blog post if you are not sure if this drive is compatible in your machine.
    You might also need....
    A M.2 (NGFF) to PCIe adapter card - so you can install this drive in a standard desktop case or Mac Pro tower computer.
    A PCIE M.2 SSD to USB 3.0 external enclosure - so you can clone, copy, or retrieve data from this drive or an existing one already in your system.
    * To achieve maximum throughput in the 2008 Mac Pro, one or two of the PCIe 2.0 x16 slots must be used. These models have two x16 PCIe 2.0 slots and two x4 PCIe 1.0 slots. The latter PCIe 1.0 slots will only allow up to 585-753MB/s data transfer rates.
    Data Throughput Rates
    Throughput rates are provided in the table below. See the performance notes regarding slower PCIe 2.0 x2 and PCIe 1.0 slots
    ** From the review at barefeats.com: "Using the 'Expansion Slot Utility' in the System/Library/CoreServices folder, we reconfigured the PCIe slot speeds to various combinations of 4, 8, and 16 lane slots to benchmark the XP941. The transfer speeds above were achieved using the 4 lane slots. The 8 lane and 16 lane slots did not produce any faster transfer speeds. On other other hand, if you use a 1 lane slot, the transfer speeds drop to 200MB/s READ and 170MB/s WRITE. We tested with both OS X Leopard and Snow Leopard. OS X Tiger kernel panicked at startup. Though we didn't try it, it should also work with OS X Lion, the last Mac OS to be officially supported on the 2006 Mac Pro."
    https://www.ramcity.com.au/buy/samsung-xp941-512gb-m.2-pcie-x4-80mm-ssd/MZHPU512 HCGL-00000
    "How to Clone an existing drive to a new SSD" Windows but there were some good tips like this:
    Samsung XP941 512GB M.2 PCIe x4 80mm SSD
    https://www.ramcity.com.au/blog/how-to-clone-an-existing-drive-to-a-new-ssd/1382 97
    https://www.ramcity.com.au/blog/how-to-clone-an-existing-drive-to-a-new-ssd/1382 97

  • I can not save any data to external hard drive from my mac pro. Is there anyone can help me in this regard?( note, when i first plug my ext. drive to mac i chose option to backup later)

    I can not save any data to external hard drive from my mac pro. Is there anyone can help me in this regard?( note, when i first plug my ext. drive to mac i chose option to backup later)

    The device may be formatted for Windows, as NTFS. The format is readable, but not natively writable on a Mac. To write to the device, you must either reformat it (erasing all the contents) or install third-party software to enable write access to NTFS.

  • I have a Mac pro(1 free bay) and a mac mini I need to back both of them  Is it better to use an external NAS HD or an internal hard drive on my mac pro (mid 2010) What option has the faster GB/s?

    I have a Mac pro(1 free bay) and a mac mini I need to back up both of them (time machine)  Is it better to use an external NAS HD or an internal hard drive on my mac pro (mid 2010)
    What option has the faster GB/s?

    Disk drive using native SATA bus interface will allow the drive to copy and always present and ready.
    But once you have backup any hourly changes should be smaller and as long as the NAS and your switch should allow enough.
    You should always have off line backups and don't rely on just one backup set or just TimeMachine.
    WD RED models are designed for RAID and NAS and 7.2k instead of your more standard slower green 5400 rpm green models while still costing less than WD Blacks.
    http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B008JJLW4M/
    How to clone your system:
    http://macperformanceguide.com/Mac-HowToClone-backup.html
    http://macperformanceguide.com/Mac-HowToClone.html
    http://www.macupdate.com/app/mac/7032/carbon-copy-cloner
    Using Cloning as a Backup Strategy
    http://www.macupdate.com/app/mac/7032/carbon-copy-cloner
    http://www.bombich.com/software/updates/ccc-3.5.html
    Clone to internal, TimeMachine to NAS is one way to go at it.

  • Anyone using Brother HL-2170W with their Mac?

    Anyone using Brother HL-2170W with their Mac? I read some reviews at newegg and they are not bad , but at the apple store the reviews are not that good at all. Is this because it is not working well with Leopard as most printers don't or what?

    Verizon informs me that Windows is only needed to download and install some form of authentication and that the free wi-fi hotspot service can be used from then on from the Macintosh side. Even though it's a Windows program, I'm assured that the authorized status will be detected when the Mac laptop is used under OS X

  • Adding a solid state hard drive to a Mac Pro 3,1

    I have two hard drives in my Mac Pro 3,1.  I want to add a solid state hard drive and upgrade Yosemite to it.  I will eventually use my existing drive as extra storage.  Does anyone know if this model of Mac Pro can support SSD drive?  Also, can I mix and match normal hard drives with SSD drives?  I know I will also need an adapter since SSD's are 2.5 inch.  The one I am thinking about getting is the Kingston SSDNow V300 Series SV300S37A/240G 2.5" 240GB SATA III Internal Solid State Drive (SSD).  Any feedback that can confirm or deny compatibility would be appreciated. 
    Thanks,

    I have Mac Pro (4.1 2009 model) and I have Samsung SSD 840 EVO 500GB. There is an issue you you want to run Yosemite.  That drive requires that TRIM is enabled otherwise the perforamnce goes down. There is a Trim Enabler  that you can get but but default Yosemite rejects it and disables it so you end up with a driver with TRIM not eanbled. There is a hack that allows you to get it working again but it has some security implications.
    Just be aware of it.
    Tom

  • 4 Questions re installing a second Optical Drive in a Mac Pro (Harpertown)

    For years I have owned and used a Sony DRX-810UL-T optical drive as an external unit with my Mac Pro "Harpertown" purchased on February 19, 2009. It was connected to the computer using the firewire cable and it worked correctly.
    Some Background
    Today it dawned on me I had an empty optical drive bay in the Mac Pro so I should move the Sony drive in there and eliminate a bit of the clutter on my computer desk. I read the section on installing optical drives in the little Apple manual that came with my computer but it only discussed a single drive installation.
    Checked on line and found several sources describing how to do this and a couple of YouTube videos also showing how to do this. (Oddly only one of the videos mentioned the need for plugging in the power cable).
    I made sure I plugged the cables into the proper units as both had helpful legends on them indicating which was for the top drive and which was for the bottom drive.
    After installation I powered up and found neither drive would appear.
    Checked the About this Mac item in the Apple menu and got confirmation that the system didn't see any drives. Opened the computer again and unplugged the Sony's power and data cables then closed the computer and fired up again.
    The original Super Drive again appeared and worked correctly.
    The Questions:
    1. Since the Super drive came with the Mac Pro and was in the top space can I assume it needed to stay there and not get moved to the lower space?
    2. Since the Sony DRX-810UL-T has the correct connectors does this indicate this drive can be used with the Harpertown Mac Pro?
    3. If it can, did I miss setting some jumpers? I noticed both drives have one jumper in place but each appears to be in a slightly different spot than the other.
    4. Since the Sony drive worked correctly with my current OS (10.6.6) using the firewire cable can I assume it does not need a firmware update to be used internally.
    Wrap up
    Since the original Super Drive is working properly I am sure I did no damage to it or the computer. It would be nice to be able to get the Sony DVD drive to work internally, however.
    Thanks, in advance, to anyone who can offer some help with this situation.

    hatter,
    Thank you for this added information. Here's the current status of things.
    Just to check that the Sony drive would work internally I disconnected the superdrive (ata cable and power cable) and made the Sony drive the only drive plugging it in as if it was the top drive. The jumper for it was set to cable select.
    The Profiler found it and listed is in both the ATA section and the disc burner section.
    I checked the jumper on the superdrive to be sure it was also set for cable select and plugged both drives back in using the top connections for the super drive and bottom connections for the Sony,
    Again only the SuperDrive appears in the ATA list and and the disc burner list.
    I am beginning to wonder it the problem may actually be with the ribbon cable that snakes back to the motherboard.
    Since that cable has a set of dual outlets at the drive end and has them labeled for top and bottom, is it possible to plug in only one drive using the bottom connector as a test to see if data flows to the motherboard?
    Is it possible some part of that cable has somehow become disconnected at the motherboard?

  • Is OCZ Vertex Turbo 60GB 2.5" SSD compatible with my Mac Pro, or do I need

    Is OCZ Vertex Turbo 60GB 2.5" SSD compatible with my Mac Pro, or do I need the Vertex Mac Edition?
    I have decided to purchase a SSD to use as a boot drive in the spare optical drive bay.
    There are so many brands available, and Intel X25-M 'G2' seems generally to be the most highly rated overall. However, there is virtually no stock of 80GBs in the UK at present, except at extortionate prices, and I don't need 160GB.
    Kingston SSDs are very reasonably priced, but seem to be a bit of an unknown quantity, although I rate their DDR3 memory very highly.
    I have visited the websites of several manufacturers, and read various online reviews, and the recently introduced OCZ Vertex Turbo has had some good reviews, albeit on PC forums.
    At the moment I can buy the 60GB Turbo for £170.66 inc.VAT from ebuyer.com, whereas their price for the standard Vertex 60GB is £193.99 inc. VAT, which seems very strange!
    When I googled "OCZ Solid State Drives +UK", Amazon UK appeared on the listings, but there was a footnote which said " not suitable for use on Mac".
    OCZ list a Vertex Series Mac Edition on their website, and that is why I am asking this question.
    Unfortunately, there are no UK listings when I google the Mac Edition, and I am hoping that somebody of the ilk of "the hatter" or "samsara" will be able to answer my question.
    If anybody else is using the Vertex Turbo in a Mac, I would be very grateful for your input. Likewise if you have had bad experiences with OCZ SSDs.
    If I wait 3-4 weeks I should be able to buy an Intel X25-M G2 80GB for round about the same price as the Vertex Turbo 60GB, i.e. if prices remain the same as currently being quoted by vendors who are out of stock.
    All input will be very gratefully received. If it is positive, I will go ahead and order a Vertex Turbo from ebuyer, in case they run out of stock (which is 16 at present).
    Many thanks in anticipation, guys!

    Hi Samsara,
    Many thanks for your advices once again.
    60GB will be more than adequate as my boot drive. At the moment I am using a VelociRaptor 300GB, and I have used less than 30GB of space. That is after reinstalling all my applications and software, and includes all my files, folders, and printer drivers etc.
    I have utilised under 50GB of the original 640GB hard drive, but that includes a lot of photo images which I imported into both iPhoto and Aperture.
    When I receive my Agility EX SSD I will clone from the VelociRaptor using Super Duper, and I will then set up a 4 drive RAID 0 using 4 VelociRaptor 300GB disks. That set up should suit my needs for many years to come, even when I eventually upgrade from Photoshop Elements 8 to CS5.
    I will back up the Agility EX to the 640GB hard drive using Super Duper Smart Update, and that will be my spare boot drive.
    The 4 drive RAID 0 will be backed up to the My Book Studio Edition II 2TB, using Time Machine.
    In your experienced opinion, do you think that set up will be satisfactory?
    The Agility EX is actually the latest generation of OCZ SSDs, and it is one of only 2 models in their "Maximum Performance" range, whereas the original Agility was only a "Mainstream" model.
    The key factor is that the Agility EX uses single-level cells (SLC), instead of multi-level cells (MLC). It is second only to the Vertex EX Series in terms of performance per GB in the OCZ range of SATA 2.5" Solid State Drives.
    In very recent reviews it has outperformed both the Vertex Turbo and Vertex 120GB models from the OCZ "Performance" range in most of the test benchmarks.
    http://www.hardwarecanucks.com/forum/hardware-canucks-reviews/24507-ocz-agility- ex-60gb-ssd-review.html
    http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=oczagilityex&num=1
    http://www.guru3d.com/article/ocz-agility-ex-ssd-60gb-review-test/3
    The above are just a few of the very favourable reviews of the Agility EX SSD.
    I preferred to buy a 60GB SLC, rather than a 120GB MLC, because SLCs reputedly have 10 times more life expectancy, and performance wise per GB there is no comparison.
    Only time will tell if I have made the right decision!

  • I need to buy some new hard drives for my Mac Pro

    I had an extra internal hard drive in my Mac Pro, a Seagate one, that suddenly stopped working and I needed to send it to a data recovery company, so...
    Now I'd like to
    - Install a new internal HD
    - Install a NAS with two/three disks. (Hitachi if possible, as I have read are the ones that last longer, more reliable than WD and by far more than Seagate).
    But to do that I'd like to know how to find out the right type of disks for my computer.
    I'd be very gratefull if anyone would tell me where to look it up.
    Thank you in advance
    In case any of you can help with this, these are the details of my Mac Pro
    thanks again
    +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
    Mac OS X Lion 10.7.5 (11G63b)
    2 x 2.66 GHz Dual-Core Intel Xeon
    Memory 7GB 667 MHz DDR2 FB-DIMM
    Model Name:          Mac Pro
      Model Identifier:          MacPro1,1
      Processor Name:          Dual-Core Intel Xeon
      Processor Speed:          2,66 GHz
      Number of Processors:          2
      Total Number of Cores:          4
      L2 Cache (per Processor):          4 MB
      Memory:          7 GB
      Bus Speed:          1,33 GHz
      Boot ROM Version:          MP11.005D.B00
      SMC Version (system):          1.7f10
      Serial Number (system):          Not Available
      Hardware UUID:          00000000-0000-1000-8000-0017F20F9F40
    +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
    The only HD now
    Intel ESB2 AHCI:
      Vendor:          Intel
      Product:          ESB2 AHCI
      Link Speed:          3 Gigabit
      Negotiated Link Speed:          3 Gigabit
      Description:          AHCI Version 1.10 Supported
    ST3250824AS  P:
      Capacity:          250,06 GB (250.059.350.016 bytes)
      Model:          ST3250824AS  P                         
      Revision:          3.BQK  
      Serial Number:                      9ND1P4X7
      Native Command Queuing:          Yes
      Queue Depth:          32
      Removable Media:          No
      Detachable Drive:          No
      BSD Name:          disk0
      Medium Type:          Rotational
      Bay Name:          Bay 1
      Partition Map Type:          GPT (GUID Partition Table)
      S.M.A.R.T. status:          Verified
      Volumes:
    disk0s1:
      Capacity:          209,7 MB (209.715.200 bytes)
      BSD Name:          disk0s1
      Content:          EFI
    HD INTERNO PRINCIPAL:
      Capacity:          249,2 GB (249.199.591.424 bytes)
      Available:          37,91 GB (37.914.918.912 bytes)
      Writable:          Yes
      File System:          Journaled HFS+
      BSD Name:          disk0s2
      Mount Point:          /
      Content:          Apple_HFS
    Recovery HD:
      Capacity:          650 MB (650.002.432 bytes)
      BSD Name:          disk0s3
      Content:          Apple_Boot

    NAS is of course external and depends on how you access it. And then t he ideal for RAID5 for instance woudl be WD RED series, but those do not work inside Mac tower.
    Look up "TLER"  regarding WD drives and RAID.
    Apple does not endorse or anything, not in decades and when there were problems - G5 and early adoption of SATA and changing standards and features, it was users that did the troubleshooting. 
    So unles you are using Apple's PRO RAID card, which I don't think anyone would or should and which is limited to 2TB drives and only instance of a ceiling on supported drives (it is req'd for SAS though), use your own research.

  • Want to add internal hard drive to my Mac Pro

    I want to add an internal hard drive to my Mac Pro bought in 2011
    Running Lion 10.7.5  Processor is 2.8 GHz Quad Core Intel Xeon
    Have a 1TB SATA
    Do I need a 2.5" or 3.5" ? Any other criteria i should know about when looking?
    Advice is appreciated.

    For a Mac Pro you'll probably want to go with a 3.5" drive. I would recommend Hitachi. I put a 2.5" new model Hitachi in my laptop along with an SSD and the Hitachi HD is unbelievably fast for a "spinner." If that's how there 2.5" models are there 3.5" models will only be better.
    Make sure none of the drives you use have a variable rotational speed. Some of the Western Digital Green drives have that and they go to sleep a lot. When they sleep they have to wake up and when they wake up it causes a delay. It won't happen if the drives in constant use but it can be annoying. I believe the Green drives are intended primarily for backup use where speed isn't critical but energy savings and longevity are.
    These are my opinions and observations.

Maybe you are looking for

  • How to create HUs and input SNs for a Inbound Delivery by BDC or Function?

    I need to create HUs and input SNs for Inbound Delivery Order as VL32N. At first, I create a BDC program using T-code VL32N, it does work for a few HUs in one Order, but when there are more than 5 HUs in one order, the later can't be input by this pr

  • How to get the spool request number ?

    Hi All, I am working on a smart-forms. I am using a custom transaction to print these smartforms. When I execute the transaction the print screen comes where I can do print preview or print. Now to convert this Smart Form to PDF I need to know the sp

  • Installation of Oracle Apps 11i

    I have purchased Oracle Apps 11i(One month license) around two months back. Will it be a problem if I install after 30 days of purchase?(I have back dated the host by two months. The Host Name is Ciber. I tried to load Vision demo on WIN NT6.0 SP6 by

  • Keys on keyboard

    I have a french keyboard on my 15' aluminum pwrbk. After some software problems that got fixed, and after several restarts I just disovered tant the arobase @ key has been switched with the < key.. How can I get it back to the normal setting? Thank y

  • Is it possible to use the agilent e3633a with labview 6.1?

    Hi at first, please excuse me. my english is bad if you can see in the header, i try to controll the e3633a with lab view 6.1. i´ve downloaded, the hpe363xa and controll with this vi my 3632a without any kind of problems. could i control with this vi