Anyone using Tivoli or OpenView with Forte?

I'm interested in hearing from anyone who is using Tivoli or HP OpenView
with Forte. What I'd like to know is what capabilities of these products
you are using and whether you used the Forte-supplied "shareware" or some
other means to integrate with Forte.
Thanks,
Stephen
_,--_/\ Stephen Szalla
_/ \ Technical Specialist
{ ) Forte Australia
\_,---. / Voice: +61 3 9684 7711
`* Fax: +61 3 9699 5477
v mailto:[email protected]
http://www.forte.com/australia
To unsubscribe, email '[email protected]' with
'unsubscribe forte-users' as the body of the message.
Searchable thread archive <URL:http://pinehurst.sageit.com/listarchive/>

I use Skype and the built in mic and speakers are fine

Similar Messages

Has anyone used a Dell 1908FPb with a MacBook Pro OSX 10.6.8? What do I need to get/do? thanks

Has anyone used a Dell 1908FPb with a MacBook Pro OSX 10.6.8? What do I need to get/do? thanks

Hi 4judy,
If you are looking to use an external display with your MacBook Pro, you may find the following articles helpful:
Apple Mini DisplayPort adapters: Frequently asked questions (FAQ)
http://support.apple.com/kb/ht3382
OS X: How to use multiple displays with your Mac in Mountain Lion and earlier
http://support.apple.com/kb/ht5019
Regards,
- Brenden

RE: Using CORBA as Middleware with Forte'

This is one solution when the two sides want to be somewhat independent of
each other.. To use Forte messaging the environments have to be connected,
identical Forte versions, probably identical versions of all objects
involved (rather than just correct IDL), etc. I've toyed with this as well
for a client with two major Forte application development efforts occurring
in completely different business units.
-Greg
-----Original Message-----
From: Sean Brown [SMTP:[email protected]]
Sent: Thursday, October 22, 1998 1:56 PM
To: Giuseppe Sorce; Lenny Hon
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Using CORBA as Middleware with Forte'
If you don't mind me asking, why would you ever want to do this? If
you are
talking between two Forte services, why would you not want to use
the native
protocol which is bound to be more efficient since it was written
specifically for that purpose? The only reason I can think of is if
you
need two Forte services to talk to each other through a firewall and
the
firewall is configured to only allow certain protocols through, such
as
IIOP. Is this what you are trying to do? If not, what is your
reasoning?
Thanks,
Sean Brown
Cornice Consulting Inc.
mailto:[email protected]
-----Original Message-----
From: Giuseppe Sorce <[email protected]>
To: Lenny Hon <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected] <[email protected]>
Date: Thursday, October 22, 1998 10:05 AM
Subject: RE: Using CORBA as Middleware with Forte'
>
>Lenny, I'm sorry but I think that my problem is more complicated.
>No java clients or java servers are involved: I want to use CORBA
as
>middleware between 2 different Forte' partitions (running on
different
>forte' environments).
>For example imagine you have 2 different Forte' applications (say
>application A and application B) in 2 different forte'
environments.
>Now imagine to define an IIOP-enabled service object (Inbound) in
>application A and, starting from the generated IDL (using corbagen
utility)
>to create a IIOP-enabled service object (Outbound) in application
B.
>Application B will be the Corba Client and application A will be
the Corba
>Server.
>They don't use Forte' middleware for communication (they are in
different
>Forte' envs).
>
>Giuseppe Sorce
>
>
>
>
>
>Lenny Hon <[email protected]> on 22/10/98 15.35.40
>
>Please respond to Lenny Hon <[email protected]>
>
>To: Giuseppe Sorce/CSI/IT, "'[email protected]'"
> <[email protected]>
>cc:
>Subject: RE: Using CORBA as Middleware with Forte'
>
>
>
>
>I have successfully used Forte IIOP-enabled service object to
communicate
>with my client Java program that uses VisiBroker 3.2 for Java ORB.
For the
>information, you can read the Forte Web Enterprise manual and the
following
>tech notes: 10950, 10951, 11145, 11152. I found them from Web
manual.
>
>Lenny Hon
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Giuseppe Sorce [mailto:[email protected]]
>Sent: Thursday, October 22, 1998 5:58 AM
>To: [email protected]
>Subject: Using CORBA as Middleware with Forte'
>
>
>
>I would like to find a way to use CORBA middleware as an
alternative for
>communications between Forte' partitions (I'm using Forte' rel.
3.0.G plus
>Visibroker 3.1 ORB).
>
>I found a technical note (ID 10520) but it is quite old and it is
related
> to Forte' release 2.0.E.2 (!).
>
>Any experience with Forte' release 3 and Visibroker would be
greatly
> appreciated.
>
>
>
>TIA
>
>Giuseppe Sorce
>
>CSI Piemonte - C.so Unione Sovietica 216 - 10134 Torino - ITALY
>
>tel. +39-011-3168736
>
>fax +39-011-3168212
>
>e-mail [email protected]
>
>url http://www.csi.it
>
>
>
>-
>To unsubscribe, email '[email protected]' with
>'unsubscribe forte-users' as the body of the message.
>Searchable thread archive
<URL:http://pinehurst.sageit.com/listarchive/>
>-
>To unsubscribe, email '[email protected]' with
>'unsubscribe forte-users' as the body of the message.
>Searchable thread archive
<URL:http://pinehurst.sageit.com/listarchive/>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>-
>To unsubscribe, email '[email protected]' with
>'unsubscribe forte-users' as the body of the message.
>Searchable thread archive
<URL:http://pinehurst.sageit.com/listarchive/>
To unsubscribe, email '[email protected]' with
'unsubscribe forte-users' as the body of the message.
Searchable thread archive
<URL:http://pinehurst.sageit.com/listarchive/>
To unsubscribe, email '[email protected]' with
'unsubscribe forte-users' as the body of the message.
Searchable thread archive <URL:http://pinehurst.sageit.com/listarchive/>

This is one solution when the two sides want to be somewhat independent of
each other.. To use Forte messaging the environments have to be connected,
identical Forte versions, probably identical versions of all objects
involved (rather than just correct IDL), etc. I've toyed with this as well
for a client with two major Forte application development efforts occurring
in completely different business units.
-Greg
-----Original Message-----
From: Sean Brown [SMTP:[email protected]]
Sent: Thursday, October 22, 1998 1:56 PM
To: Giuseppe Sorce; Lenny Hon
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Using CORBA as Middleware with Forte'
If you don't mind me asking, why would you ever want to do this? If
you are
talking between two Forte services, why would you not want to use
the native
protocol which is bound to be more efficient since it was written
specifically for that purpose? The only reason I can think of is if
you
need two Forte services to talk to each other through a firewall and
the
firewall is configured to only allow certain protocols through, such
as
IIOP. Is this what you are trying to do? If not, what is your
reasoning?
Thanks,
Sean Brown
Cornice Consulting Inc.
mailto:[email protected]
-----Original Message-----
From: Giuseppe Sorce <[email protected]>
To: Lenny Hon <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected] <[email protected]>
Date: Thursday, October 22, 1998 10:05 AM
Subject: RE: Using CORBA as Middleware with Forte'
>
>Lenny, I'm sorry but I think that my problem is more complicated.
>No java clients or java servers are involved: I want to use CORBA
as
>middleware between 2 different Forte' partitions (running on
different
>forte' environments).
>For example imagine you have 2 different Forte' applications (say
>application A and application B) in 2 different forte'
environments.
>Now imagine to define an IIOP-enabled service object (Inbound) in
>application A and, starting from the generated IDL (using corbagen
utility)
>to create a IIOP-enabled service object (Outbound) in application
B.
>Application B will be the Corba Client and application A will be
the Corba
>Server.
>They don't use Forte' middleware for communication (they are in
different
>Forte' envs).
>
>Giuseppe Sorce
>
>
>
>
>
>Lenny Hon <[email protected]> on 22/10/98 15.35.40
>
>Please respond to Lenny Hon <[email protected]>
>
>To: Giuseppe Sorce/CSI/IT, "'[email protected]'"
> <[email protected]>
>cc:
>Subject: RE: Using CORBA as Middleware with Forte'
>
>
>
>
>I have successfully used Forte IIOP-enabled service object to
communicate
>with my client Java program that uses VisiBroker 3.2 for Java ORB.
For the
>information, you can read the Forte Web Enterprise manual and the
following
>tech notes: 10950, 10951, 11145, 11152. I found them from Web
manual.
>
>Lenny Hon
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Giuseppe Sorce [mailto:[email protected]]
>Sent: Thursday, October 22, 1998 5:58 AM
>To: [email protected]
>Subject: Using CORBA as Middleware with Forte'
>
>
>
>I would like to find a way to use CORBA middleware as an
alternative for
>communications between Forte' partitions (I'm using Forte' rel.
3.0.G plus
>Visibroker 3.1 ORB).
>
>I found a technical note (ID 10520) but it is quite old and it is
related
> to Forte' release 2.0.E.2 (!).
>
>Any experience with Forte' release 3 and Visibroker would be
greatly
> appreciated.
>
>
>
>TIA
>
>Giuseppe Sorce
>
>CSI Piemonte - C.so Unione Sovietica 216 - 10134 Torino - ITALY
>
>tel. +39-011-3168736
>
>fax +39-011-3168212
>
>e-mail [email protected]
>
>url http://www.csi.it
>
>
>
>-
>To unsubscribe, email '[email protected]' with
>'unsubscribe forte-users' as the body of the message.
>Searchable thread archive
<URL:http://pinehurst.sageit.com/listarchive/>
>-
>To unsubscribe, email '[email protected]' with
>'unsubscribe forte-users' as the body of the message.
>Searchable thread archive
<URL:http://pinehurst.sageit.com/listarchive/>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>-
>To unsubscribe, email '[email protected]' with
>'unsubscribe forte-users' as the body of the message.
>Searchable thread archive
<URL:http://pinehurst.sageit.com/listarchive/>
To unsubscribe, email '[email protected]' with
'unsubscribe forte-users' as the body of the message.
Searchable thread archive
<URL:http://pinehurst.sageit.com/listarchive/>
To unsubscribe, email '[email protected]' with
'unsubscribe forte-users' as the body of the message.
Searchable thread archive <URL:http://pinehurst.sageit.com/listarchive/>

Has anyone used Aperture 2.0 with 8800GT?

Has anyone used Aperture 2.0 with the new 8800GT? I'm about to order a new Mac Pro and wonder if Aperture will get a speed boost with the 8800GT over the HD 2600XT. I've read many times that Aperture is very GPU dependent, but then I've also read, on Barefeats.com for example, that the graphics card really doesn't do that much of a difference after all.
For me, on my dual 2.0 G5 with 4.5GB and a X800XT, what's been most annoying with Aperture 1.5 has been the slow load times for raw images (15-20MB). But now with the quick preview mode in Aperture 2.0, that really isn't an issue any more.
Is the 8800GT worth waiting for, or should I just get the Mac Pro now with the HD 2600XT?

Hi Don
I'm using Aperture 2.0 with the 8800GT. My system is the new MacPro 8 core 2.8GH with 10GB RAM. I'm shooting Nikon D3 lossless compressed RAW files. Approximately 12-14MB each.
I do not need to use the quick preview mode. Images open instantaneously,either fit to screen or 100%. All the image adjustments are shown with no time lag. My D2X uncompressed raw files,19MB, display in approximately one second with quick preview turned off.
I'm no MAC hardware expert so I don't know how much the speed is the result of the 8800GT but I'm just one happy camper.
Hope this helps
John Blake

Has anyone used Verizon Fios Services with Windows 7 ?

Has anyone used Verizon Fios Services with Windows 7 ?

Yes Beta And RC. It works the same as Vista, with probably some enhancements. Didn't have any issues, but I did not try wireless.

Anyone using Brother HL-2170W with their Mac?

Anyone using Brother HL-2170W with their Mac? I read some reviews at newegg and they are not bad , but at the apple store the reviews are not that good at all. Is this because it is not working well with Leopard as most printers don't or what?

Verizon informs me that Windows is only needed to download and install some form of authentication and that the free wi-fi hotspot service can be used from then on from the Macintosh side. Even though it's a Windows program, I'm assured that the authorized status will be detected when the Mac laptop is used under OS X

Using Tivoli Work Scheduler with ODI

Hello,
I have a customer who is looking to use Tivoli Work Scheduler with ODI.
Are there any references, best practices or general advice how to use TWS with ODI. Alternatively, if there is another recommended approach then i'd be interested to know.
Regards,
David

Is this item supposed to be compatible with the 2nd gen nano?
I ask because the dock connector on the second gen nano is not in the same place as the other iPods (the first gen nano for instance) and this may be your problem.
There have been posts here before about 2nd gen nanos not working with accessories that accommodate the first gen.
Best bet would be to contact the manufacturer.

Anyone using Blackmagic Intensity Pro with Premiere CS4

I've looked through the threads and have seen similar postings, but no real good answers. Is anyone using Blackmagic Intensity Pro to viiew timeline on a HDTV using the HDMI connector?
I purchasedf the Intensity Pro and can't get it to work with CS4. Any assistance would be appreciated.

If you're using a Core i7 processor, one of the problems might be with the motherboard. There's only one Intel board that BM has approved (sorry, don't have the model in front of me -- on a piece of scratch paper in my wife's car).
I'm looking to build a new system myself and have been looking at the Intensity Pro card as well. The main feature I'm looking for is real-time preview and program output to an HD monitor that I'd hook up via HDMI. I probably also would use it to capture analog sources for audio and video. I don't have any interest in BM's lossless data capture as it creates monster-sized files. That's why I was also planning to add Cineform once it's fully approved and working for CS4. However, as best as I can tell, the Intensity Pro card doesn't recognize the Cineform codec on the timeline. Does anyone know if and how well these two will function together within Premiere? (I'm also assuming that the new 4.1 release might make these types of Premiere add-ons work better.)
Thanks.

Has anyone used a MacBook Air with a TV as a monitor?

Wondering if anyone can advise on experience with using a tv as a monitor? I don't believe Mac make just a monitor for this purpose do they?

it's ok, highly pixelated, meaning you will see pixels. I would say its great to watch videos, but any reading or such will be displeasing. Really depends on the pixels per inch of your TV also. But, I would stick with nothing more than 27" for reading or anything text based.

Anyone using a 4K monitor with FCP X?

Is anyone using FCP X on a 4K monitor? I'm thinking about getting a Dell 4K monitor as my main monitor but I'm a little worried the user interface support on 4K is weak. I think everything is going to look super tiny.
Has anyone already experienced this?
Thanks!

So I have my new Mac Pro set up. 8-Core, 32 gigs RAM, Dual 700 GPUs, 512 gig internal Flash drive.
I purchased the 27" Thunderbolt display as my main Final Cut Pro X screen and I have the Dell UP2414q 4K monitor plugged in as the Viewer display.
I have the Dell set to "Best for Display" and it works fine. I have some 4480 x 1920 RED footage and I have the FCP X Viewers on the Dell. The footage is set to 100% and it bleeds a little off the sides, as it should since the monitor is 3820 wide. It's at its native resolution.
The user interface elements of the second monitor are at normal size - the menu bar, the FCP X view options. Buying a 4K monitor and using Best for Display gives you the desktop the size of a typical 1080 monitor, but it all looks like a Retina display. It's very crisp.
So if you want a second monitor to hold a ton of Adobe palettes, and have a very large desktop, I'd recommend getting a Thunderbolt display, beause this display behaves like a 1080 monitor in that regard. If you want a 4K monitor specifically for color grading 4K footage at the native size so you can see all the artifacts and things you wouldn't see with the footage at 50%, this Dell monitor is fine and it's $890 on Amazon. It's not a professional color grader's monitor, obviously, but it does well for me.
I took some 4480 x 1920 RED footage that had a sky that was gray (the famous Mercedes in the mountains footage). I used the color picker color correction in FCP X and was able to select that sky very easily. I can see why the fat 4K footage is so great in regards to color grading. Because you don't have the massive color gradiation and artifacts you get in the more compressed media, when you use the color picker, it selects a very large, clean, section of the sky. I was able to quickly make the sky more saturated and blue and play it in real time (Better Performance) it's it's perfectly clean with no halos around the tree branches as they move into the foreground of the sky. Very nice!
Nice feature in FCP X is all the effects, transitions, etc., have a "4K-ready content only" button at the top so it only presents you with effects and transitions that work with 4K footage.
It took a lot of time calibrating this Dell monitor. It has the Adobe RGC color space built in but when I set it to that and set the OS X Display color option to Adobe RGB, it all had a very slight purple/pink huge. Very slight. Whites were not pure white like they are on the Thunderbolt and my blue sky had a tinge of pink to it.
I calibrated it with advanced options in the OS X Display preferences. I then connected my Samsung HD LED TV into the HDMI port of the Mac Pro and set it as my A/V display in FCP X. I was able to do the custom color setting on the Dell monitor itself and lower the saturation and RGB values. It took about 15 minutes to get it looking right. Now, I don't see the very slight purple/pink tink. My blue sky looks blue, etc., and it looks exactly how it will look on DVD and Blu-ray and projectors at film festivals.
The Samsung LED TV was a breeze to use. As soon as I plugged it into the HDMI port of the Mac Pro, the displays changed and OS X went to 1920 x 1080 60hz. The color was set to an HD color preset (I forget the number and I disconnected it). Arranging the multiple monitors is as you'd expect, just works.
BTW, I have 2 10 TB 5Big Lacie Thunderbolt 2 hard drives. They are about $1K each at 10 TBs. I have one for my footage and one as a backup with Time Machine. No formatting necessary - just plug them in and go. I plugged in the first one, told OS X no for Time Machine. Plugged in the second one, told Time Machine yes. Renamed the second drive "Backup". I turned off hard drive sleep becuase it's annoying. You hear it spin up, spin down, spin up, etc. as you work.
I used the AJA benchmark and this is what I got with 16 gig test file, 4K video simulation:
Write 740.3 MB/s
Read: 849.1 MB/s
Fast!
FCP X loads in 4 seconds on this system off the internal Flash drive.
Cheers!

Anyone using Tascam DM-3200 with Logic

Anyone using the Tascam DM-3200 with Logic? Sure seems like an easy solution combination of converters and DAW control, plus onboard effects.

Hey Joseph,
I have this combination. I like it so far. I'm not really a "mixer" person but I am resolute in learning how to use this thing in depth!
Anyways, as far as controlling Logic, I got it working pretty easily. It seems that the faders don't seem as "sensitive" as my Logic Control (I think I mean resolution, perhaps?). I also have not played with the Tascam enough to know what other features are mapped out besides just level faders. It is very easy to switch between a fader layer and the Mackie control layer: just one button press. One thing though is if I have logic set to auto-sync in, and play, it will receive some timecode from somewhere and then stop after 2 bars. Don't know why this is, and it means I'll have to disable the Tascam's midi if I want to sync Logic to, say, Protools.
I connect my old 828 via Adat to Tascam and it sounds so much better than the Analog ins to the Tascam, so I'm happy about that. I have also the 8 Analog input card so I have a total of 24 Analog Ins which is nice too.
If you have any specific questions, I'll try to asnwer them, but so far, i like the combination a lot. My one complaint - they put the Control Room volume way up at the top of the mixer. My keyboard (Roland XV88) protrudes a bit from the front of the mixer, so i can see myself getting back spasms if I reach that volume control a lot!! I guess I'm shorter than the average user! Anyways, the mixer sounds good enogh to my ears.
Cheers
Ken
PS The manuals for the mixer are at Tascam's website. You can also take a peek at them to get a sense how things are setup.

Anyone using non Apple ram with standard heatspreaders?

Hi,
Is anyone using non standard Apple ram with normal sized heatsink/heatspreaders and if so have you had any problems?
I can find ram for the same spec that works but they only have the standard thin silver heatspreader attached and am concerned about running temps etc.
If anyones using these modules without problems, please post here!
Thanks.

Might want to read this article and it has some good information to help you decide.

Anyone using Groove Agent 2 with GB202

GA1 in GB1 had to many problems. I couldnt manipulate the interfase. Now i only use Virtual guitarist. Im wondering if GA2 works smoothly. Im also wondering how it would work.
Could it be used on more than one track to create fills etc..
anyone out there using any VST/AU's at all

When used as a VST with Cubase, GA3 can write the MIDI data directly onto an instrument track as the machine is played, skipping the "create external MIDI file/import.
What you need to look at are the automation capabilities.
Every parameter of the GA series can be automated. If you map the song out and "play" GA3's buttons, Logic records your "performance".
Fills, 1/2 Time, Pattern Change...etc are all recordable via automation.
Affer you get the song mapped out and the automation/performance finished the track can then be bounced as audio or exported as MIDI for editing.
pancenter-

Question for Anyone Using CS4 Production Premium with Windows 7

I'm testing Windows 7 at home with CS3 Production Premium and have not had any issues. Of course CS4 is quite a bit different.
Anyone using CS4 Production Premium on Windows 7 regularly? Any issues to report?
Thanks

Thanks for replying to my post:
mark_m wrote:
"I notice that when I open an old CS4 project and PPro asks you to locate the file, that the "show only exact file name" tick box seems to have no effect.
This is on Windows 7 RC 64bit."
On our systems at work that have XP and Vista + CS4 Production Premium. I've noticed this with preview files in particular and possibly some others, I don't remember. The "show only exact file" checkbox is greyed out. This is somewhat annoying because projects can have a huge number of preview files with long cryptic names making it a pain to locate the correct one manually to get the ball rolling. If I don't think it'll take too long to re-render, I just select "skip preview files".
We bought 3 licenses for Windows 7 and I'm encouraged by the performance, reliability and features on my home test system (RC 64) that has CS3 installed. Can't wait to get rid of XP and Vista.

Using CORBA as Middleware with Forte'

I would like to find a way to use CORBA middleware as an alternative for
communications between Forte' partitions (I'm using Forte' rel. 3.0.G plus
Visibroker 3.1 ORB).
I found a technical note (ID 10520) but it is quite old and it is related
to Forte' release 2.0.E.2 (!).
Any experience with Forte' release 3 and Visibroker would be greatly
appreciated.
TIA
Giuseppe Sorce
CSI Piemonte - C.so Unione Sovietica 216 - 10134 Torino - ITALY
tel. +39-011-3168736
fax +39-011-3168212
e-mail [email protected]
url http://www.csi.it
To unsubscribe, email '[email protected]' with
'unsubscribe forte-users' as the body of the message.
Searchable thread archive <URL:http://pinehurst.sageit.com/listarchive/>

I would like to find a way to use CORBA middleware as an alternative for
communications between Forte' partitions (I'm using Forte' rel. 3.0.G plus
Visibroker 3.1 ORB).
I found a technical note (ID 10520) but it is quite old and it is related
to Forte' release 2.0.E.2 (!).
Any experience with Forte' release 3 and Visibroker would be greatly
appreciated.
TIA
Giuseppe Sorce
CSI Piemonte - C.so Unione Sovietica 216 - 10134 Torino - ITALY
tel. +39-011-3168736
fax +39-011-3168212
e-mail [email protected]
url http://www.csi.it
To unsubscribe, email '[email protected]' with
'unsubscribe forte-users' as the body of the message.
Searchable thread archive <URL:http://pinehurst.sageit.com/listarchive/>

Anyone using Tivoli or OpenView with Forte?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for