AP 1231G: Two listing in Netstumbler for Cisco access point

Hi
We are having problems with an Access Point deployed in our infrastructure. An anominally, we are experincing, is our access point shows two listings in netstumbler. One shows the SSID and channel, the other shows the MAC of the lan connection, the host name of the AP and the IP assigned to the AP.
How do we disable the lan side from showing up? We have twelve deployed and this is the only one showing this anominally.
thanks you

Are you associated to that AP by any chance?

Similar Messages

Need Information For Connecting Access point to WLC 4402

Hi Friends
I need Some information for Connecting my New Access point ( Cisco AIRLAP 1242AG) with WLC(4402) Controller
In our network set up we have two WLC(4402) we needs to Connect this New Accesspoint To one of our WLC
My Access point is brand New. I need to Know what all i have to do inorder to connect this AP to the controller (from Acesspoint perspective & WLC perspective)
I need to Know what I need to do in AP to connect to the Controller
Do i need to Assign Static IP Address forAP or after connecting to the switch it automatically gets ip from DHCP and regsiter with controller??
Do i Need to Configure my AP with default gateway(the switch to which is connected ?) & DO i need to configure the AP with Controller Ip address ??
Pls Assist
Regards
Safwan

Hi Scot...
We tried Connecting the Access Point yesterday, but it failed....
We are using Cisco 3500 Access point ...
when we connected , first it automatically got an ip address using DHCP but following error occurred
P70ca.9bd5.77c6#
AP70ca.9bd5.77c6#
AP70ca.9bd5.77c6#
Not in Bound state.
*Mar 1 00:13:56.539: %CAPWAP-3-ERRORLOG: Invalid event 38 & state 2 combination
*Mar 1 00:13:56.555: %DHCP-6-ADDRESS_ASSIGN: Interface GigabitEthernet0 assigne
d DHCP address 10.50.11.26, mask 255.255.0.0, hostname AP70ca.9bd5.77c6
*Mar 1 00:14:04.564: %CAPWAP-3-UNSUPPORTED_WLC_VERSION: Unsupported version 6.0
.182.0 on WLC USSTLController01
*Mar 1 00:14:14.564: %CAPWAP-3-UNSUPPORTED_WLC_VERSION: Unsupported version 6.0
.182.0 on WLC USSTLController01
*Mar 1 00:14:24.564: %CAPWAP-3-UNSUPPORTED_WLC_VERSION: Unsupported
version 6.0
.182.0
version 6.0
.182.0
on WLC USSTLController01
version 6.0
.182.0
Then I COnfigured Ap with Static ip address & default gateway & controller Ip but tht too didnt work...
.182.0 on WLC USSTLController01
AP70ca.9bd5.77c6>
AP70ca.9bd5.77c6>
AP70ca.9bd5.77c6>
AP70ca.9bd5.77c6>
*Mar 1 00:13:40.908: %CDP_PD-2-POWER_LOW: All radios disabled - NEGOTIATED WS-C
3750X-48P (e05f.b907.9a20)
AP70ca.9bd5.77c6>
AP70ca.9bd5.77c6>
AP70ca.9bd5.77c6>en
Password:
AP70ca.9bd5.77c6#
*Mar 1 00:13:48.033: %CAPWAP-3-DHCP_RENEW: Could not discover WLC using DHCP IP
. Renewing DHCP IP.
AP70ca.9bd5.77c6#
AP70ca.9bd5.77c6#
AP70ca.9bd5.77c6#
P70ca.9bd5.77c6>
*Mar 1 00:13:40.908: %CDP_PD-2-POWER_LOW: All radios disabled - NEGOTIATED WS-C
3750X-48P (e05f.b907.9a20)
AP70ca.9bd5.77c6>
AP70ca.9bd5.77c6>
AP70ca.9bd5.77c6>en
Password:
AP70ca.9bd5.77c6#
*Mar 1 00:13:48.033: %CAPWAP-3-DHCP_RENEW: Could not discover WLC using DHCP IP
. Renewing DHCP IP.
I also Need to Know Cisco Access point 3500 can be associated with WLC 4402 ( version 6.0.182.0) ??
Pls Advice How to proceed further

Configuring Cisco Access Points 1602i Air-SAP-1602I-Z-K9

Hi everyone,
I am having touble configuring cisco access points 1602i. I have configured them and they are broadcasting SSID and clients are able to connect to them, but the only thing which is troublesome is speed. I have 100Mbps bandwidth speed but at access point I am getting speed between 17 to 25. Can anyone please tell me where I am gone wrong.
I have Juniper Srx210 configured as backbone for providing internet on fiber. Then further I have attached one POE switch (managable). From that switch I have attached 4 access points.
One more thing,two ports of Juniper is configured as Vlans, one for staff and one for students. I have attached this POE switch to Student Vlan, but haven't configured ports of POE switch as trunk. Please tell me do I have to configure ports as trunk on POE Switch. Is this the cause of slow bandwidth over access points.
I am also planning to go for Wlan Controller to manage Access points. When I contact my supplier about it, told me the following:
"You just need to convert the Access points to autonomous mode. Here are some details, there is no additional charge."
https://supportforums.cisco.com/message/3889653
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/wireless/access_point/conversion/lwapp/upgrade/guide/lwapnote.html#wp160918
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QQ_NuxdRhQ4
https://supportforums.cisco.com/docs/DOC-14960
I looked at the links but couldn't understand properly. Then I searched over the internet and found out that
"a cisco autonomous access point basically runs on its own while a lightweight access point uses a centralized device called a wireless lan controller to get its configuration. autonomous access points are managed individually, while the lightweight access points can be managed centrally. also, the switchport configurations to support both types of access points will differ. "
I didn't understand, why he suggested to go for Wlan controller and to upgrade access points to autonomous mode, when according to above finding, it says that autonomous access points runs individually.
Please advice.
I shall be thankfull

Hello Scott and Leo,
Thanks for all your help.
I have managed to install and configure 4 Access points and Now Access points are giving speed between 25 to 45Mbps. Still not enought but it sloving the purpose. Everyone is enjoying their face book. I will soon get the Cisco Wlan Controller as well. I dont know if there is a way to get more speed from these access points. I am ready to buy more equipments if required.
Anyway, today I need your guys expretise once again. As you know Junipr Srx 210 is configured for fiber internet to provide internet services to school. Now we are changing the building and transfering the line to new building. This time I want to use Cisco router in place of Juniper Srx210. But I need to know what model will support the current configuration for fiber. Would you please tell me what model/series router will be suitable for fiber internet and for implementing other restrictions.
I am attaching a picture of current jiniper Srx 210 for your consideration.
I shall be very thankfull to you
Sarabjit

Which Cisco Access Point is Waterprof ? (outdoor:BR1300 + AIR-ANT24120)

hi,
My questions to the community :
i have to choose for a customer some 50 Access points but that must have an external antennas with at least 8 dbi as gain and to be waterprof
for me the BR1300 + AIR-ANT24120 is a good choice if the BR1300 is Waterproof (For me :normaly all Cisco Access Point Outdoor must be WaterProof : but i want to have a confirmation with a document if possible )
and it's interessant to knew ,which Cisco Access Point is Waterproof ?
Think you All !
Zammit Ikbel

the 1310 is going to be waterproof, as is the 15xx product line, (152x and 155x). All this can be found in the data sheet for the AP.
That being said, you can also put any of the external AP into a NEMA enclosure, and have it be waterproofed, so long as the enclosure is rated as such.
HTH,
Steve

Blackberry Z10 connection with an Aironet Cisco Access Point 1200

Hi everybody,
I'm trying without success a connection between a Blackberry Z10 and an Aironet Cisco Access Point 1200.
We have no BB Server, we would like just to connect the WIFI.
I've checked this points during the activation of the device:
There's no LEAP protocolle.
There's an EAP-Fast possibility.
There's Mac Address recognition possibility.
When we try to use the EAP-Fast possibility, we generate a .pac file, but i don't know where i can put this file so that the Blackberry recognize this file. I've search the whole day and didn't find anything... there's simply no explanation with the Z10 around the .pac file without a BB Server.
I've try the Mac Address recognition and it simply doesn't work (no error the search time is too long)
Every other older smartphones - Blackberry (there's 4 devices) are working.
Anyone have an idea about? a suggestion? a list of compatible WIFI Devices?
Thank you ahead.
Have a nice day.
Joel.

Sorry i don't understand your answer.
I'm not a developper but a system administrator.
I just would like to use a Balckberry Z10 with our Wifi/Router Aironet Access Point 1200.
not more.
Best regards,
Joel

PPPoE on Cisco Access Point

Hi, Im looking for possibility to configure Cisco Access Points for PPPoE and VPDN anybody knows pls reply to [email protected] tks

I think it is possible to configure AP to fucntion over PPPOE. But since AP is just a layer2 device, we also need a layer 3 device like router to support PPPOE. Without layer 3 device, it is not possible.

Looking for an Access Point with 2 Ethernet ports and powered via PoE

Hi Gurus,
I am looking for an Access Point with 2 Ethernet ports and the access point can be powered via PoE. I have been assigned with a requirement where the rooms need to have access point as well as an Ethernet Cable provided from the Access Point as a backup for connectivity.
The room only has one data cable coming from the main IT room as well does not have a spare power socket to power the Access Point. Will be good if it can be centrally controlled or controller based.
Any recommendations?
Regards
J

For the backup plan, the cheapest solution may be to just run a couple new cat5e drops to the room(est cost $250). If not then purchase a small Cisco POE switch for the room(est cost $2k). For wireless I would purchase a POE enabled Cisco AP. But you will need to verify the POE switch/blade you will be connecting the AP to can power the AP you buy. I got burned by that issue when we purchased some Cisco 1251 AP's with dual radios and they needed more power than our 4500 POE blades could handle. We were told we would need to purchase new 48 port 10/100/1000 blades or power injectors. Our Cisco sales vendor took the heat for that mistake.
Posted by WebUser Steven Kinney from Cisco Support Community App

AP1262 bridge to Non-Cisco Access Point?

I would like to use a Cisco AP1262 in a mobile command vehicle to bridge to any WiFi Access Point that I know the SSID and Pasword to. Will the 1262 Bridge to a Non-Cisco Access Point?
If so, any assistance in finding an example configuration would be appreciated.
Thanks,
Brian

Hi Brian,
Yes, you can configure 1262 as Universal Workgroup bridge where it will associate to any cisco or non-cisco root AP. You can only connect one wired client behind universal WGB.
You just need to configure "station-role workgroup-bridge universal <wired_client_MAC>" under radio interface of WGB. (1262)
Something similar should work for your 1262, if you want it in 5GHz, otherwise configure radio 0 interface for WGB
hostname WGB
dot11 ssid <SSID-NAME>
authentication open
authentication key-management wpa version 2
wpa-psk ascii <PASSWORD>
interface Dot11Radio1
encryption mode ciphers aes-ccm
station-role workgroup-bridge universal 068d.098a.d422 <- Ur wired MAC
ssid <SSID-NAME>
bridge-group 1
interface GigabitEthernet0
bridge-group 1
NB: I haven't tested this, so you have to test & confirm. If WPA2/AES is not supported then you may need to choose suitable security protocol & encryption mechanism.
HTH
Rasika
*** Pls rate all useful responses ****

IOS to LWAPP for 1130AG Access Points

We have initially installed IOS-based 1130 APs. If we would be upgrading it to LWAPP mode, could we pushed IOS-to-LWAPP upgrade thru the network? what procedures are required?

Hi Leopoldo,
This is possible and fully supported and can be done using the "LWAPP Upgrade Tool". Have a look at the following;
LWAPP Upgrade Tool Troubleshoot Tips
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk722/tk809/technologies_tech_note09186a008072d9a1.shtml
Access points must run Cisco IOS Release 12.3(7)JA or later before you use the upgrade tool.
System Requirements
You can use the Autonomous to Lightweight Mode upgrade tool to install Cisco IOS Release 12.3(11)JX on these access points:
All 1100 series access points containing MP21G (802.11g) radios
***All 1130, 1230, and 1240 series access points
All modular 1200 series access points running Cisco IOS software and containing these supported radios:
802.11g: MP21G, MP31G
802.11a: AIR-RM21A-x-K9, AIR-RM22A-x-K9
All 1300 series access points in access point mode
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/wireless/access_point/ios/release/notes/b311jx1.html
Cisco has released a free tool called the "Autonomous to Lightweight Mode Upgrade Tool" that allows selected Cisco Aironet autonomous access point models to be configured for lightweight mode operation.
The Autonomous to Lightweight Mode Upgrade Tool supports the following models:
Cisco Aironet 1240AG Series access points
Cisco Aironet 1230AG Series access points
Cisco Aironet 1200 Series access points that contain 802.11g (AIR-MP21G-x-K9) and/or second-generation 802.11a radios (AIR-RM21A-x-K9 or AIR-RM22A-x-K9)
Cisco Aironet 1130AG Series access points
**Cisco Aironet 1100 Series Access Points that contain 802.11g radios (AIR-AP1121G-x-K9)
Cisco Aironet 1300 Series Access Points/Bridges (AIR-BR1310G-x-K9 or AIR-BR1310G-x-K9-R). A Cisco Aironet 1300 Series operating in Lightweight Access Point Protocol (LWAPP) mode only operates as an access point. This series does not support LWAPP bridging mode.
The Autonomous to Lightweight Mode Upgrade Tool supports a process to migrate an autonomous access point from autonomous mode to lightweight mode. Unlike a VxWorks to Cisco IOS Software upgrade, this process is a Cisco IOS Software upgrade to the existing Cisco IOS Software image-not an operating system "swapout". In converted access points operating in lightweight mode, Cisco IOS Software continues to run on the access point, while LWAPP is used to communicate with a wireless LAN controller. Since LWAPP supports automatic access point configuration, there is no need to retain or convert the original autonomous Cisco IOS Software access point configuration.
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/netsol/ns340/ns394/ns348/ns337/networking_solutions_white_paper0900aecd804f1a23.shtml
Cisco Aironet Access Point Support for Lightweight Access Point Protocol
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps6521/prod_bulletin0900aecd80321a2c.html
Upgrading Autonomous Cisco Aironet Access Points to Lightweight Mode
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/wireless/ps430/prod_technical_reference09186a00804fc3dc.html#wp157147
Hope this helps!
Rob

PPPoE and VPDN config. in Cisco Access Points

Hi, Im looking for possibility to configure Cisco Access Points for PPPoE and VPDN anybody knows pls reply to [email protected] tks

I can only comment on the wireless voice side. Phones will be setting the Qos (Cos and ip precedence) you will need all the devices in the network to understand these QoS and act apropiately, prioritizing voice over other data.
If you can't guaratee that all devices that the voice will cross will maintain those Cos/dscp settings and will prioritize the voice, you can't guarantee how the voice quality would be.

Cisco Access point management vlan

Hi All,
I have all my switches configured to run on native vlan 500 and management on vlan 10
with the cisco access point , if I make 500 native or another word trunk untagged vlan then I can't access the router using the BVI interface which is meant to have ip from vlan 10.
vlan 10 is the management network across our business and all management ips are on that range.
what are the possible solutions?

When you connect the access point to the wired LAN, the access point links to the network using a bridge virtual interface (BVI) that it creates automatically. Instead of tracking separate IP addresses for the access point's Ethernet and radio ports, the network uses the BVI.
When you assign an IP address to the access point using the CLI, you must assign the address to the BVI. Beginning in privileged EXEC mode, follow these steps to assign an IP address to the access point's BVI:
Step 1
configure terminal
Enter global configuration mode.
Step 2
interface bvi1
Enter interface configuration mode for the BVI.
Step 3
ip address address
mask
Assign an IP address and address mask to the BVI. Note If you are connected to the access point using a Telnet session, you lose your connection to the access point when you assign a new IP address to the BVI. If you need to continue configuring the access point using Telnet, use the new IP address to open another Telnet session to the access point.

Can cisco MSE(mobility service engine) configured to work with non-cisco access points?

I understand that access points can be configured to forwards all the probe requests to cisco wifi controller. cisco MSE(mobility service engine) gets the probes from wifi controller to find the location of the mobile devices.
My question, can cisco MSE(mobility service engine) be configured to work with non-cisco access points?

No and the reason why is the NMSP communication from the MSE to the WLC. Other vendors don't support this so there is no communication happening.
-Scott

Cisco Access Points Rebooting

Has anyone experienced a Cisco Access Point reboot itself, on it's own?

7 out of 17 are rebooting... but it's not isolated to one IDF it's different spots within the building.i will check the log in flash.
Hmmmmm ... And if you do a "sh version" to everyone of them it comes up saying something like "by power-on"?
If this is the case, you may also want to consider the copper cables between your Injector and your AP.

QOS config 4500 switchport for Lightweight access point

What is the best QOS configuration what needs to be applied on a 4500 switchport for Lightweight access point.

Hi,
If you are asking about Layer 2 QoS configuration for switch-port then it is global command, which will apply on all switch-ports, not for any specific switch-port.
As far as switch-port mode is concern which in connected to LWAP then yes it is better you keep it in default mode.

License for Monitor Access Point

Dear Friends,
I have a 5508 controller with 200 access points . I have additional 10 access points to be used as Monitor Mode, as this will be connected to the MSSE. Question here is does the monitor access points requires licenses to configure on the controller or does IPS license of 25 AP's is enough for MSE.
I think for these 10 Monitor Access Points, we need to have licenses for the controller as well as MSE license for the access point. Am I right in this assumption?
BR,
Sid

Hi Sid,
the license on the WLC is for "joined APs" whatever is their role. So monitor mode APs count the same as other APs.
Regards,
Nicolas

AP 1231G: Two listing in Netstumbler for Cisco access point

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for