AP Invoice Tax Amount Field not editable

Hi all,
The tax amount (LC) field on the AP Invoice field is not editable. What tax setup do I need to do to allow the tax amount to be editable. All of our sales transactions are tax exempt, however, we need to pay tax to some of our service vendors.
Thanks,
Jane

Hi,
It is Standard SAP B1 behavior, Tax Amount is editable in Purchase Documents and not editable in Sales Documents.
You have to frame the tax formula to match the amount correctly.
Do you want to enter in your own tax amount?
Did you check the form settings for Tax amount?
It is not a problem, its standard SAP B1 behaviour so you can click the link(Orange) button of row level Tax amount
and open the define  tax amount distribution window. put the tax amount in the row level and update.
Thanks,
Madhan.

Similar Messages

  • Invoice tax amount is not equal to the calculated tax amount

    Hi All,
    I'm importing AP invoices through Open Interface R12.
    Lines includes Tax lines as well. But Invoices become held when I try to validate.
    I'm getting this hold reason: "Invoice tax amount is not equal to the calculated tax amount"
    Can anybody advise please ?
    Thanks,

    Use T. code SM30 and give table name J_1IT030K_V and click on maintain button give your chart of account, press enter here assign appropriate G/L A/C against Tax code MK.

  • How to make AP Service Invoice Tax Amount editable?

    Hi Experts,
    On this forums I have read that it is possible to edit the Tax Amount in a AP Service Invoice. On my DB (SAP 2007 A - PL 42) the Tax Amount field is not editable.
    Is this something that you need to setup in Administration?
    Thanks for your help.
    Marli

    Hi,
    I have found a way:
    In order to modify this amount, because the Tax Amount if made up of several tax jurisdictions (county, city, state, etc), you have to drill down into the Tax amount in the AP Service Invoice Line detail (there should be a Drill Down arrow next to the amount)(this arrow are only there after you put the unit price in), which will take you to the Tax Amount Jurisdiction window, and modify the amount of each jurisdiction.  This is pretty risky because now you have human error possibility, but it can be done this way. It will override the Tax Amount for that row and not save the changes to the Tax Code.
    Thank you for your help!
    Marli

  • TDS TAX AMOUNT  IS NOT MACHING WITH INVOICE WTAX AMOUNTu2019

    Dear All,
    I am Facing Following Problem in TDS
    While creating an A/P Invoice after putting row level information when user click on u2018ADDu2019 button u201CWithholding Tax Tableu201D opens for deduction of TDS amount. When user selects u201CWithholding Tax Codeu201D in u201CWithholding Tax Tableu201D to deduct TDS amount for an invoice system shows WTax amount as per rate of deduction. But when user click on u2018OKu2019 to u201CWithholding Tax Tableu201D window, WTax Amount will comes as zero on A/P Invoice window.
    Then when again user will go to u201CWithholding Tax Tableu201D and manually put the value of WTax Amount system reflects it on A/P Invoice window.
    In case when we set approval procedure to A/P Invoice, this invoice goes for an approval. After coming back as approved invoice when originator of invoice going to u2018ADDu2019 the same document system shows an error as u2018TDS TAX AMOUNT  IS NOT MACHING WITH INVOICE WTAX AMOUNTu2019
    please reply me ASAP
    Thanks & Regards,
    Swapnil

    hi
    try this
    We need to follow  the following steps
    u2022     Open the BP master for which TDS needs to be deducted go to the accounting tab followed by tax option and then  click on the checkbox subject to withholding tax
    u2022     Click on the option WTAX codes Allowed and select the TDS Category
    u2022     On the previous window click the check box pertaining the checkbox  u201CTDS OVERLOOKu201D
    Regards,
    Manish

  • Tax Code and Tax Amount Fields are not appearing

    Hi to all,
    While making Downpayment Request (F-47) Tax Code and Tax Amount Fields are not appearing in the screen.
    for more clarity...
    suppose PO is 1150 include all taxes ( Amount 1000+ Tax Amount 150)
    as per agreement with vendor we need to raise DR for 1150 and based on DR we will make downpayment to vendor (F-48)
    But in F-47 screen Tax Code and Tax Amount fields are not appearing.
    Could any body help me on this??
    Thanks in Advance
    Regards,
    Schilukuri

    why you are looking for tax code field, pay gross amount as per PO, same amount will update in PO history as well as Vendor account.
    Even if you find the tax code field and check the tax code check box, system will not calculate tax  at the time of down payment or down payment request.
    Please remember that by default standard SAP provides the tax code field in f-47 or F-48.

  • In fbl1n report for document type RE  withholding tax amount is not showing

    in fbl1n report for document type RE  withholding tax amount is not showing
    in sap note 363309 determines
    Solution
    Remove the field which contains the withholding tax information (field BSEG-QSSHB) from your display
    variant.
    If you want to display the withholding tax information, double-click on the document number and
    subsequently choose 'Withholding tax'.
    my doubt is we remove the field BSEG-QSSHB in layout how can show the withholding tax amount in FBLIN report
    how to remove from the layout
    please clarefy
    bhayyapu   

    Hi,
    If you want to check amounts of withholding tax for the vendors, you have some options to view it. You can access the WITH_ITEM, LFC1 tables by SE16. You have too the S_P00_07000134 report. This report is developed for the Colombia but I already used for the another country with the ABAP development for this country.
    Also you can use table join BSIK and WITH_ITEM by SQVI for the open items and BSAK and WITH_ITEM for cleared items. It is more simple and fast.
    JPA

  • Error Message FF747  -The tax amount must not be greater than the tax base

    Hello,
    We are attempting to post an import vendor invoice through transaction    FB60 for Israel company code . Since the tax charged by the vendor is not fixed every time , we are entering the tax amount in the    FB60 screen manually , without selecting 'calculate tax'.The amount of tax is greater than the amount of expense as per the real business scenario. For example amount of expense is 100, amount of tax is 200 and the total amount charged by the vendor is 300 .However when we simulate the posting we get an error - The tax amount must not be greater than the tax base-Message no. FF747
    We tried putting a very high percentage in the tax code also but it didn't help
    We would like to go ahead with this posting. Could you pl throw light on the same . ? Is there any way (OSS note ) or a work around which can resolve the issue ?
    Best Regards
    Amit  Kulkarni

    Hello
    This may be  a work around in other cases , but since we want the amount to be updated in the BSET table for further VAT reports , we would like  this to be posted along with the expense item

  • FBL1( VENDOR LEDGER REPORT)-  Withholding tax amount is not coming .

    in FBL1 ( vENDOR lEDGER rEPORT) - WITHHOLDING TAX AMOUNT IS NOT CMING IN COLUMN  QBSHB OF FBL1.
    Purchasing document number is not coming also.
    How these fields may appear in the above said report. Is any config missing ?
    Thanks in advance
    M K Agarwal
    9967029930

    TDS posted from MIRO will not reflect in line item report, i have taken opinion from SAP for the same issue few days back, SAP has given the following opinion.
    *With reference to the difference in behaviour as compared to the document posted for example from MIRO which is an MM transaction and FB60 which is a FI transaction please note the following:
    The withholding tax amount that you are using i.e. Field BSEG-QBSHB is designed to fill for the classic withholding tax. And extended withholding tax information is stored exclusive in table WITH_ITEM.
    Also note that MIRO does not give the user the control in case of Classical withholding tax. It only supports Extended withholding tax. Hence it does not populate BSEG fields in case of Extended WT.
    So in MIRO, the data for extended withholding tax are saved within the table WITH_ITEM and not within the table entry BSEG-QBSHB. The latter isnot updated during the procedure. Furthermore it is not possible to select data from table WITH_ITEM
    within the transaction FBL1N in a transparent and unique way, as FBL1N only reads BSEG / BSIK / BSAK tables.
    In your line layout,you define a field BSEG-QBSHB. But actually the field of vendor/customer line item is filled with zero from FI. Thus,it shows zero in line item display*
    Please review note 363309 for detailed explanation and explains the functionality which is valid even for your release.
    So it is not possible to display withholding tax information in the line item display transactions, since this information is not
    held in the BSEG / BSIK / BSAK tables, but is instead stored in the WITH_ITEM table.
    Please convey to your client, standard SAP will not show the TDS information in line item reports, documents posted from MIRO and refer  the note 363309.

  • Tax Amount is not updated into BSEG

    Dear All,
    I have recently added a tax amount field MWSTS from table BSEG into FBL1N - Vendor Line Item Display. To my surprise the input tax amount is not updated into BSEG table. The input tax is normally posted using either MIRO or FB60.
    Any one has the same problem? Can please kindly share how to fix the problem?
    Thanks in advance for your kind assisstance.
    rgds,
    Dahlia

    Thanks Andreas,
    However I do believe that it should be updated into BSEG - MWSTS as we have mutliple companies in different countries in the system. All the other companies have the input rate updated into BSEG - MWSTS for the vendor line item, only the company for India is not updated.
    Yes, BSET do have the tax amount updated but I can't use BSET table in FBL1N. I need to provide the tax amount information for each vendor line item in FBL1N.
    thks
    Dahlia

  • FF747 Tax amount must not be greater than the tax base

    We have sample orders where the order amount is calculated and then discounted fully.  However, our freight goes to our tax software separately due to different taxability rules.  Therefore, the original tax amount (pre-discount) is sent and we end up with FF 747: The tax amount must not be greater than the tax base.
    The business wants to track this freight amount.  How do we change the message from error to warning or does anyone have a work around so we can invoice these customers?
    Thanks,
    Michelle

    Hello ,
    I am facing the same issue. Could you please let me know how you resolved it ?
    Thanks.

  • Item's withholding tax amount is not zero

    Dear All,
    When ever we clear the vendor account through f.13 system was showing the below mentioned message.
    S No customer documents selected
    S No G/L account documents selected
    I Only accounts with debit and credit postings are included
    X Item's withholding tax amount is not zero 0101 K 319936 13000031 105352237 1
    X Item's withholding tax amount is not zero 0101 K 319936 13000031 105352237 2
    I Stop date " 02.01.2010 Stop time " 17:00:00
    Client is asking no need to show Items withholding tax amount is not zero message.
    Where as the clearing criteria is business place .
    Regards,
    Teja

    Hi,
    please refer to the note 499902 and 442588 for the explanation why the transaction F.13 has given out
    this error and which transactions (FBZ2 or F-53) should be used to clear the items with the withholding tax info maintained.
    Reg
    Madhu M

  • How to make fields not editable in screen

    Hi gurus,
    I have a table and i need to make some fields not editable depending on the values of other fields of the table .
    Example :
    my table have these fields : begin_date, name.
    If the begin_date < sy-datum  -->  then the field  ' name' should not be editable.
    Tankyou.

    Hi,
      OK. I did some code and was able to get the results as you want. Created a table YTESTHV with two fields YYDATE and NAME. Generated a two screen maintenence for the table. Screen 2 - Overview screen, screen 3 Detail screen.
    Overview screen.
    PBO.
    PROCESS BEFORE OUTPUT.
    MODULE LISTE_INITIALISIEREN.
    LOOP AT EXTRACT WITH CONTROL
      TCTRL_YTESTHV CURSOR NEXTLINE.
       MODULE LISTE_SHOW_LISTE.
       MODULE DISABLE_FIELDS.
    ENDLOOP.
    MODULE DISABLE_FIELDS
      move extract to YTESTHV.
    if YTESTHV-yydate > sy-datum.
       loop at screen.
        if screen-name = 'YTESTHV-NAME'.
         screen-input = '0'.
         modify screen.
         else.
         screen-input = 1.
         modify screen.
        endif.
        endloop.
    endif.
    Details screen PBO.
    PROCESS BEFORE OUTPUT.
    MODULE detail_init.
       module change_mode.
    module change_mode
    if YTESTHV-yydate > sy-datum.
       loop at screen.
         if screen-name = 'YTESTHV-NAME'.
           screen-input = 0.
           modify screen.
         endif.
       endloop.
    endif.
    When YYDATE is greater than sy-datum field NAME is display only.
    Regards,
    Himanshu

  • The tax amount must not be greater than the tax base

    Hi Experts,
    User is trying to "Relase to Account" in t-code VF01 he is getting an error message The tax amount must not be greater than the tax base.
    During Debuging i found the error is raised in Function module      RV_ACCOUNTING_DOCUMENT_CREATE
    Message raised is
    Message Class : FF
    Message number: 747
    Mesage "The tax amount must not be greater than the tax base"
    Request to through some lights on this issue.
    Reagrds
    Sree

    Hi,
    did you check SAPNET notes with "VF01" and the message class/number as search terms. There are some notes dealing with this case eg 872449, and 184985.
    Best regards, Christian

  • Tax amount is not appearing in consumption history of earmarked fund

    Dear Experts,
    It is a requirement from my customer, the tax item be populated with the same earmarked fund, commitment item, functional area, funds center and fund of the related expense or revenue item.
    The transaction OBBH and the exit presented in attachment was used to try to achieve that requirement.
    The accounting document was correctly created with the tax item correctly populated with the earmarked fund, commitment item, functional area, funds center and fund from the related expense item.
    The funds management document was also  correctly created including the tax item with the correct commitment item, fund, funds center and functional area.
    The problem detected is related with the missing tax value in consumption history of the earmarked fund. The value of the tax item is not appearing in records of tables KBLP and FMIOI.
    Could you please help me with this problem?
    Kind Regards,
    Rui Neves

    Hi,
    Thanks for your answer.  We are reimplementing the REFX solution for a company.  The existing system is also in ECC6.  For  contracts made in existing system when periodic posting done, tax is shown against both contract and rental object.  The value of periodic posting is same for both contract and rental object.
    However, in the new implementation, tax amount is not appearing against rental rental object.  Tax amount is appearing against rental contract.  As a result, there is a difference in amount.  Is this correct as a process ?
    Regards,
    T Saravanan

  • Tax amount and sales tax code fields not visible in tcode MIR4

    Hi,
    A workflow has been cretaed for cretaing the invoices. Here in SRM invoice, the tax code and Sales tax code fields are not visible in tcode MIR4 though data has been passed while creating it.
    When i am checking the "calculate tax" check box, am able to see these two fields on the MIR4 page.
    Am not able to find the reason for this behaviour. As its working fine for other invoices. This is the case with only SRM invoice.
    Kindly provide your inputs.
    Thanks!
    Regards,
    Razia Shaheen.

    Hello,
    What you are saying is that the Invoice coming from SRM (Via Idoc i supose) is not bringing the tax code? is that it?
    Cheers !

Maybe you are looking for

  • Apps bought before 3.0 upgrade are synced but don't show up

    After I upgraded to iPhone OS 3.0 (I also upgraded to iTunes 8.2 just before that) all of the apps I bought/downloaded (priced and free apps) before the upgrade except two (about 33 apps) will sync to my iphone. Itunes shows the information at the to

  • Terrible service trying to move a phone line - Not...

    Hi, I have been with my current BT phone line for 2 years and I was very happy with the service I was receiving. Therefore I decided to move my BT line to the new property I am moving into next month. I have called up BT for house moves, which arrang

  • Not solved with Blinking Folder with Question Mark after Erasing Hard Drive

    Before asking, I found someone had asked exact the same question, but that was actually an unsolved thread. Re: Blinking Folder with Question Mark after Erasing Hard Drive to try to restore to Factory Settings Level 1(0 points)sdc3gJul 5, 2013 6:24 P

  • Difference between 8 and 9?

    Can someone tell me the biggest differences between imovie 8 and imovie 9? My computer has 8 on it, but I am teaching a class on imovie to teachers with 9. Thanks! Kelly The class is tomorrow!

  • What is host bus interface for pavilion dv7 1448dx

    I'm thinking of Installing a usb 3 ExpressCard/54 in a Pavllion dv7 1448dx. Does anyone know where I can find out if the host bus interface of the 1448dx ExpressCard slot is Gen 1.0 enabled or Gen 2.0 enabled. That will tell me if it's worth the efff