AP1240 and non Cisco

We have some non Cisco AP's that I am trying to configure a Cisco AP 1240 to associate with.
The radio will not come out of "disabled"
Antenna is connected and I have done the basic config, there is no security set up at all on the existing untit.
What are the basic setup parameters for the raido to assiciate with teh other side?
are there any debugs I could look at?

Hello,
The issue is that Cisco IOS Autonomous APs will only bridge with other Cisco model APs and Bridges. If these APs can act like client then the Cisco AP will associate as a client but this is not common for an AP. Hope this helps.
Regards,
Aaron

Similar Messages

  • Using 802.1X and non-Cisco IP Phones

    Hi there,
    Having some questions about an 802.1x/non-Cisco ip phone setup and was hoping to find some answers/user-experience with this setup.
    Main questions i'm facing:
    1) When using non-Cisco ip phones (eg Nortel or Siemens) and a previous authorized client connected behind this ip phone gets disconnected. What will this action do with the authorized state of 802.1X on the switch port? WIll it stay authorized until the reauth timer expires or does it reject communication from any other device?
    2) What about EAPOL-Logoff messages from the ip phone to the switch. Are these only used by Cisco phones when they experience a link-status change on data ports?
    Thanks for sharing your thoughts

    Overall, you need to try and deal with the fact that a machine can disappear from the network and the network may not know about it directly (i.e. Link doesn't go down).
    I have no idea what other phones do, but Cisco phones send an EAPOL-Logoff when something is unplugged. This lets the switch know directly, and 1X session start is torn down immediately, closing what would be a security hole.
    Fundamentally, re-auth is a workaround only, and this is not the reason to enable re-auth to begin with.
    If your phone doesn't send an EAPOL-Logoff in this case, the switch might be left thinking an attack is underway when someone else tries to plug in (with presumably a different MAC). You do NOT want this to occur.
    Hope this helps,

  • Having 1 router and multiple WCCP cache devices: cisco and non-cisco

    I have a 6500 running WCCPv1. I have two devices single connected to the 6500: a CE565 and a non-cisco device that does WCCPv1. The 6500 is configured for WCCP redirection. What happens to the requests ? Are they serviced by both devices in parallel ? Is only one device servicing the request ? Load balanced ? I know a cluster won't be formed because the device is non-cisco. BTW, the non-cisco device only support WCCP v1.

    Will this detection between devices work if the non-cisco device is not really a cache engine, but a web filter that uses WCCP? In reality, my ideal goal would be that traffic would be redirected to the web filter (non-Cisco), get filtered, and then redirected to the catalyst, and then again redirected to the cache engine to be cached. But I am not sure this will happen due to routing. So I guess is either one or the other, correct ? I don't have the option to connect the web filter in other box, neither the Cache Engine. I thoutht that they would not detect each other at all and the router would be doing a decision there. How do they detect each other ? via which protocol ? WCCP ?

  • Passing Voice VLAN through a non-Cisco switch

    Hi All,
    Will a non-Cisco switch (no 802.1q support) that is putted beetween Cisco IP Telephone and Cisco Catalyst switch (which is configured with auxilary Voice Vlan) pass voice vlan frames and CDP?

    Any switch should pass on either ISL(which is cisco properitary and hence not supported on non-Cisco) or IEEE 802.1Q frames or else it cannot support voice vlan support . And non-Cisco switches do not support CDP as it is once again Cisco proprietary protocol.

  • Issues connecting non-Cisco AP as a repeater to Cisco 1230

    Hi,
    I just spent the whole day going through the old posts and can not find anything that is relevant to our issue.
    We just purchased batch of 20 1230 11b APs to be used a root APs in our wireless network. Our users connect to our network using non-Cisco APs as using "AP Client" mode of the AP. Some APs have combined "AP Client/Repeater" and this is where we have issues associating these users to the 1230 APs.
    Mind you that the APs that have "AP client" mode or the USB WIFI adapters have no trouble connecting to the Cisco unit. Onlt the APs with combined "AP Client/Repeater" or "Repeater" modes do not associate.
    So far we tested non-Cisco AP such as Dlink, Netgear and Trendnet.. none of them worked as a repeater.
    Does any one any experiance with this?
    Update: We also did some testing and tried to create a bridge between Cisco and non-Cisco AP without any luck. Again all 3 brands have been tested.
    Thanks

    That is a tough one.... what you will need to do first, is look at the settings in the repeater and match it as much as you can on the Cisco AP. Look at data rates, preamble, DTIM, etc.

  • Non-Cisco WGB and H-REAP

    Anyone had success rolling out non-Cisco WGBs with H-REAP?
    My customer is using WLC 5508 with code 7.0.116.0. As per WLC config guide ( http://goo.gl/6kX0d ), Cisco has tested multiple third-party devices for compatibility. Is it possible to get that device list somewhere? My customer is using TP-Link model TL-WA901N v2. The 5508 WLC does not recognize this device as a WGB. Rather, it displays the wired client behind the non-Cisco WGB.
    Is H-REAP supported for non-Cisco WGBs? The WLC config guide says H-REAP is not supported with Cisco WGBs, but does not make a distinction for  non-Cisco WGBs.
    Regards,
    -steve w.

    Hello Stephen,
    Thanks for clarifying. Can Cisco disclose the third-party devices it has tested (non-Cisco WGB)?
    TIA,
    -steve w.

  • Question Regarding Mesh with 3702 and non AC ap´s

    Hello! 
    quick question regarding MESH deployments with 2 different sorts of AP´s: AC and non-AC modells: If my 3702i is my root AP´s, and 3602i my MAP - will AC still work in 80Mhz, or will I have to switch to 40mhz (and thus crippling (???) AC performance?) 
    Not 100% sure on this... I *think* it should still work for the normal 802.11n connection, but I´m not sure if the 80mhz channel width (needed??) for AC, will cause the non-ac 3602i to be stranded? 
    Thanks alot for your insight! 

    Currently, my network DHCP server is a software based DHCP server. In reading over your post if I understood correctly it sounds like the managed switch would have its own hardware based DHCP server to assign IP addresses to those clients identified on the "external" VLAN. Did I understand that correctly or did misread something?
    DHCP server will be software based, even though you defined it on your switch, it is DHCP service running on its OS.
    I am configuring this setup for a small business application and will need to purchase a managed switch with 16 or 24 ports. Do you have any recommendations on a particular managed switch that will handle the VLAN configuration and include POE while keeping costs in mind.
    In this forum, most of us discussed about Cisco enterprise grade wireless. Here is 2960X series switch detail, if you are interested
    http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/products/switches/catalyst-2960-x-series-switches/index.html
    You may need to check the pricing with your Cisco account manager or from a Cisco partner.
    HTH
    Rasika
    **** Pls rate all useful responses ****

  • Can we have xl and non-xl card in one chassis?

    Hello,
    In cisco document it is mentioned that to work as XL, all card in chassis must be XL (apart from scalable license requirement). Is it a chassis or vdc specific requirement?
    In below case we have create two vdcs in one n7k switch and installed the scalable license. Vdc 2 have both mixed ( XL and non-XL) module interfaces whereas VDC 3 have only XL module interfaces
    VDC 2-
    xl + non xl M-series module interfaces
    vdc 3 -
    only XL M-series module interfaces
    Can anyone please confirm if my below understanding is correct ?
    1. VDC 2 will work in Non-mode
    2. VDC 3 will work in XL mode.

    Hi babu,
    You can do this in one view it self.
    create a one attribute of type wdy_boolean.. in view context.
    Bind these attribute to read only property of table.. and  initially set the value to abap_true in wddoinit method.
    Then create one button say "EDIT" in view and create action for edit button.. in that action set the above attribute value to
    abap_false.
    so now, initially table will be in display mode, when you click on edit mode...it will become editable mode...
    Hope you got some idea.
    Regards
    Srinvias

  • Non CISCO unknown devices are being discovered in LMS

    Hi!
    I have had no problem with discovery which was used on cdp basis so far.
    Now the CDP packets do not arrive via new MPLS backbone network.  I have to use the "ping sweep feature in IP range" feature. I had to enter more than 400 subnet from file before there are more than 400 branches. ( etc. 10.31-9.1-50.252 255.255.255.252 )
    I have experienced two problems
    1. The discovery never end ( now this is not important ) :-)
    2. The common services -- device management shows discovered unknown devices whose ip addresses out side the range what are entered by me in the ping sweep range and theirs OID is not CISCO.
    (  1.3.6.1.4.1.2001.1.1.1.1  ,  1.3.6.1.4.1.11.2.3.9.1  ,  1.3.6.1.4.1.674.10892.2  , 1.3.6.1.4.1.18334.1.1.1.2.1.7.1.2 and even more )
    Due to more than 300 unknown devices the LMS device number is beyond the license number!!!!!
    Our questions.
    Why does lms add the unknown devices ( non cisco devices ) to the inventory ?
    How could lms discover  these devices ??? ) ( theirs IP are out of ping sweep range and non cdp capable devices )
    Thanks in advance!

    Thank you!
    The unknown devices were in unreachable state and they were added to DCR.
    I don't use include or exclude filter what were referred by bug.
    In spite of i use seed device list from file the LMS ping sweep debug log shows that LMS try to ping other IP addresses!!!!
    You're right, it is not normally operation may be TAC will be needed to  solve it.
    ( whether who tested it ?)
    Regards,

  • ISE web auth for non-cisco switch(D-link 3528)

    Is it possible to use ISE(inline posture node) to redirect the wired users to ISE guest portal ?
    And the wired users will get full network access after they pass the web auth.

    you can use ISE ln-line posture node with 3rd part switches
    RADIUS access device must supply the following RADIUS attributes:
        Calling-Station-Id (for MAC_ADDRESS)
        User-Name
        NAS-Port-Type
        RADIUS accounting message must have the Framed-IP-Address attribute
    VLAN, DACL features can be used  but again it depends on switch models let us know  specific switch  models . Certain advanced use cases, such as those that involve posture assessment, profiling, and web authentication, are not consistently available with non-Cisco devices or may provide limited functionality,

  • SIP 7960 to non-Cisco Switch

    Does anyone know if a 7960 (SIP) phone can connect to a non-Cisco switch and separate the Voice traffic from the access port traffic?
    I tried connecting a 7960 to a baystack 450T, configuring the switchport as a "tagged trunk", and then changing the Admin Vlan ID on the phone to the desired voice vlan. It looks as though the switch wants the access port traffic to be tagged as well.
    Any help would be greatly appreciated!
    Thanks,
    Darin

    Hi !
    You need to configure a 802.1q trunk on your non-cisco switch. The 802.1q native vlan should be the one the PC is in. The voice vlan will be tagged.
    Configure all parameters (like voice-vlan-id etc) on the phone manually (obviously CDP does not work). I have done it and it works fine (but i never tried on the switch you mentioned).
    Inline Power will also not work because the 7960 is not 802.3af compliant (yet).
    Mike

  • Non cisco/Third party phones are compatible with CCX 9 or not?

    Dear Guys,
    I have a CCX 9 server integrated with CUCM 9 and also non cisco based/Third party phones (SNOM IP Phones) as agent for CCX server. when i try to log in to CAD software with User ID and password that assigned to SNOM phone  i got JTAPI error but with CIPC(Cisco IP Communicator) works fine and i could log on without any issue. i checked RMuser controlled device and also allow controlled CTI port,all configured. i checked all documents about this issue but it is not mentioned anything about SNOM phone used as agent. any idea for that? any documents for compatibility list between CCX and agent platform...
    i have checked below links
    http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/voicesw/custcosw/ps5693/ps1844/prod_qas0900aecd80422e66.pdf
    http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/cust_contact/contact_center/crs/express_compatibility/matrix/crscomtx.pdf
    Special thanks in advance for your help
    Sara

    Hi Sara,
    If you do not see it in the UCCX comp matirx, than please remember that you will not get support from Cisco TAC incase if you hit any issues with this deployment.
    http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/cust_contact/contact_center/crs/express_compatibility/matrix/crscomtx.pdf
    Thanks,
    Anand

  • Roaming between mesh and non mesh and mesh AP design

    Hi There,
    I need some verification on the following:
    - Can client roam between Mesh AP 1550 series and Non-Mesh AP?
    - I have 1550 series AP to be installed and all the mounting area are with data point ready, which connects back to switch. Would configuring mesh for this outdoor units recommended, and guide on this. Current guide i am looking from cisco site is basically the AP do not have wired ethernet connection, my design here a bit different, all the AP's have wired connection back to the switch.
    Kindly assist.
    Thank you
    Rama

    I have seen and done installs like this. The advantage is that you don't have to worry about the backhaul dropping. So it's like any LAP but big chunky outdoor AP. If the RAP looses Ethernet connectivity... Well it changes to a MAP. So you can look at
    It as a benefit. It's always nice to be able to have Ethernet when you can.
    Sent from Cisco Technical Support iPhone App

  • MARS topology in non-Cisco environment

    In a heterogeneous, non-Cisco environment (e.g. Dell switches, Sidewinder firewall), is it possible to obtain accurate topology/visualization information? If so, how is this accomplished? Any other best-practices/gotchas for getting the most out of MARS in such environment would be helpful as well. Thank you.

    We don't really have any topology information in MARS, and for the most part don't pay much attention to the topology or attack graphs/charts. Don't even use the summary page. We don't use the MARS for anything but collecting events. Maybe I don't know what I'm missing, but we get along just fine without(we even have a mostly Cisco network).

  • Can cisco MSE(mobility service engine) configured to work with non-cisco access points?

    I understand that access points can be configured to forwards all the probe requests to cisco wifi controller. cisco MSE(mobility service engine) gets the probes from wifi controller to find the location of the mobile devices.
    My question, can cisco MSE(mobility service engine) be configured to work with non-cisco access points?

    No and the reason why is the NMSP communication from the MSE to the WLC. Other vendors don't support this so there is no communication happening.
    -Scott

Maybe you are looking for