Aperture 3 bad raw conversion with Canon files

Hi, Aperture is converting my 6400 iso raws into images I can't work with to my satisfaction. For pleasure I shot a staged disco dance event with some fun colorful lighting. When imported into Aperture via card reader the previews look somewhat similar to the Rebel's LCD jpg rendition.
One example, the stage light beams which are enhanced by smoke machines have one light with blue and another with magenta. When I click on that preview, the spinning wheel appears as usual saying loading which I believe is applying Aperture's interpretation algorithms. The results are stripping all the magenta and no matter what I do with the controls such as enhancement I can't get back the correct color. Remember the first loaded preview are similar to what I see in camera.
I rarely shoot this high of iso and I'm finding adjustments with highlights to be extremely sensitive with a much lower threshold of adjustment. On most of the previews I attempted adjustment I preferred the look before Aperture converted them. Clicking "M" for master does not revert back to what I first saw before selecting it. I can't get back to that original first imported look. I can see the differences in the previews side by side, one I click on and a similar shot I didn't.
I have never had this criticism before with this camera at 100 iso though it is recently acquired by a few months and never had this complaint with any of my NEF Nikon files. At first when beginning import the preview widow scrambled the order of the files where some images sat besides other images taken at an entirely different time. I closed everything and restarted and at first it did it again then corrected the order to which I hit the import button. I kept the images on the card and now will reload them directly onto my HD first. I'm reluctant to load into Aperture directly until I figure out what is going on.
I did download Canon's DPP processor and it did hold onto the colors that you see with the thumbnails you see to the left of the selected image. Go figure. I have not touched any of the import settings in preferences.
Your suggestions appreciated.
John

So what you're seeing initially at import is the JPEG that the camera generates as a preview for the image. All RAW files have this; the JPEG is what's used by the camera itself to give you the preview on the back of the camera.
When Aperture imports, it will initially show you the JPEG. Then, once it renders its own version, based on the raw converter built into OS X, it will show you that updated preview (which is also a JPEG). From that point on, that's what you'll see, and you can't get the RAW-embedded JPEG again.
If you use Canon's DPP, you're going to get a rendering that looks like what you saw on the camera, because they have access to their algorithms that they use for RAW->JPEG conversion. Apple doesn't have access to this; they make their own raw converter.
It may be possible that there are issues with Apple's raw converter in specific circumstances (i.e. high ISO images on a certain camera with heavy magenta or odd lighting). You don't say what version of Aperture and OS X you're using, but it looks like it is not Aperture 3.6 + Yosemite. It may be worth upgrading to see if  it's something that's improved (an easier way is if you have access to a machine with Yosemite, just open one of the RAW files in Preview, as that uses the same raw converter, to see if it's better).

Similar Messages

  • Aperture 2 Raw Conversion and Canon EOS 350D? Getting slightly worse?

    Hi,
    I have compared a few images I shot with my Canon EOS 350d using the RAW converter in version 1.1 and version 2.0. These pictures showed flowers with special lighting conditions (high contrast, with selective sunlight). Then I've looked at some other pictures.
    * 1.1 shows better distribution of light. In 2.0 a wall was more evenly lighted, where 1.1 showed that there are different different levels of light.
    * in 2.0 one often has to apply 'recover hightlights', where this was not necessary in 1.1. Bright areas on flowers are much brighter in 2.0.
    * in 2.0 dark areas are quite a bit brighter
    * in 2.0 some pixel-size artifacts were introduced. For example on some leaf, darker green pixels appeared that were not there in 1.1
    For the images I was looking at (especially when 'played' with light), the new raw converter of Aperture 2.0 seems to be a step backwards.
    What are others' experiences?
    Regards,
    Rainer Joswig

    I wonder if the slowness is related to the rendering of the canon raw files.
    As an experiment, you might try exporting the raw photos and creating a new separate library with them to see if aperture runs just as slow.
    Even if you find the nonraw library runs more smoothly, I am not really suggesting you adopt this as part of your workflow. It just might be good to know if the format is a factor or if something else is causing the laggardly performance.

  • Aperture and RAW support with Canon EOS 60D

    Got my new Canon EOS 60D yesterday. But Aperture does not support the new RAW photos from the EOS 60D yet.
    Anyone with the same problem?
    When is Apple updating the RAW support for the 60D in Aperture?

    Well, DNGs don't actually contain all the data of the original raw file, so that could be an issue.
    As an example, the focus point functionality of Aperture 3.0 doesn't work with files converted to DNG, as the camera-specific information has been stripped from the file by Adobe. I don't know whether the DNG format can actually hold that info or not, but as of today it doesn't.
    Apple historically has tended to support the new SLR cameras from Canon and Nikon, so I wouldn't be surprised if support came along shortly. That said, buying a camera the day it's available and expecting immediate support for its raw format is not all that reasonable. The vendors providing raw support don't necessarily have access to pre-release versions of the cameras (in general), so there's going to be some time necessary to develop and QA the support for the new format.

  • RAW conversion with Aperture

    Has anyone compared the quality of RAW conversion of Aperture vs. Nikon Capture as well as other converters?
    I really like the quality of nikon capture and would not want to purchase aperture unless the conversion was at least equivalent.
    Thanks for any input.
    mark
    G4 17" Laptop   Mac OS X (10.4.3)  

    I've compared Aperture's conversion side by side with Adobe Camera Raw's. My method was to do some conversions with Camera Raw and save the result along with the RAW file. Then, in the Apple Store, I performed the conversions using Aperture.
    The results from Aperture are not good. They look okay at reduced size, but if you look more closely, the de-mosaicing Aperture performs is quite bad. On some images it is only "somewhat" worse than Camera Raw; on others it is so bad as to be unusable. Shadow detail suffers the most, but highlights are not immune. Some images showed color fringing that was not present in the Camera Raw conversion, even with all chromatic aberration adjustments set to zero in Camera Raw.
    I ignored differences in color and tonal rendering because I did not have enough time with Aperture to learn to get the best results out of it in terms of color. It takes a while to figure out how to get good color out of a RAW converter.
    In no case was Aperture as good as Adobe Camera Raw in terms of image quality. The difference was immediately obvious at 100% magnification.
    I would not use Aperture for RAW conversion.
    EDIT: I forgot to mention, in case it matters, my camera is a Nikon D2X.

  • Aperture 3 Raw conversion from Nikon D700 - Bad results - Anyone?

    I recently upgraded to a Nikon D700 and have noticed I am getting some really bad conversion results from my raw files which involve my having to do a lot of work to get decent images. Most images are too dark and with strong orange cast... Any ideas? I thought it might be the camera, so I tried another computer with photoshop raw converter and images are fine. I have noticed the original import settings are strange on Aperture but cannot seem to change them, they always revert back to maximum hue boost and max boost ect... Any help would be great! thanx!

    I have a Nikon D700 and have just tried the Aperture demo- same results as you guys, disappointing RAW conversion. Contrast and sharpness quite poor and blues are 'off'
    I currently use Capture NX and was looking for something a little less 'clunky'. Though it may not be as slick as Aperture, its RAW conversion is spot on (as you would expect from a Nikon sponsored app)
    It's easy to compare the differences- open an unedited RAW file in Capture NX and save as an uncompressed, 16 bit TIFF. Import this and the original RAW file into Aperture. Prepare for disappointment :-/

  • Aperture 2 raw conversion very bad with some subjects (like sunsets)

    Please take a look at this composite:
    http://amrosario.com/rawsun.jpg
    These conversions were done in Aperture 2 using only the three different raw conversion engines and no other adjustments. As you can see, the 1.1 version is more yellow than the other two. What, in fact, the scene actually looked like is closer to the 1.1 conversion. The other two are way off. Not to mention the extreme banding visible. What the heck is going on?
    The only way I was able to get something close to the 1.1 version using the 2.0 converter was to whack out some saturation to an extreme with not so goo results. I also processed the pic in ACR 4.1 and, even though I got a little banding around the sun, the initial color was correct. Also, the white balance is the same setting for all three images (including the one I processed in ACR).
    I mean, what's with all the red/pink in these conversions. I know Aperture 2 does away with some yellow in pix, but this is crazy. And the banding is quite unacceptable.
    Any thoughts?
    Antonio

    Yeah, thanks for that tip. I boosted and it helped, but I think it could be better. The color still runs a bit on the pink/magenta side. I'll keep trying and see what happens. Still, the change can be a little jarring if not expected.
    Antonio

  • Aperture 2 vs Aperture 3 RAW conversion

    I am new to Aperture and have been reading up on it. One point I thought was interesting was that v3 RAW conversion was considered improved over v2. I could understand that there could be a variance during the initial release of v3, but at some point v2 conversion would have been updated.
    Is there a difference between v2 and v3 RAW conversion?
    If so, how big of a difference? Would it be better to use Canon RAW converter instead?
    Thanks,
    Kenn

    You need to eyeball the various conversions using your own typical photos. Each different camera model is a different RAW conversion, and each individual's brain/eyes see them differently. With the Nikon D2x I prefer Nikon's conversion over Aperture's and Aperture's over Adobe's - but Aperture's workflow is superior by a lot so I use Aperture.
    If I was selling a thousand dollar large landscape print (I wish) shot on a D2x I would do the RAW conversion using Nikon Capture NX 2 rather than using Aperture, but that is just my personal preference with that particular camera model. And I see the difference as tiny, small enough that for most photography the workflow is more important.
    HTH
    -Allen

  • RAW conversion for Canon 5D Mark II

    I can't open my raw files from my Mark II I have PSE 6 and have upgraded my raw conversion to 5.2 it still won't recongnize my .cr2 raw files from my Mark II it recongnizes my .cr2 from my 40D whats up?

    Some of the Adobe download links are wrong and take you to an earlier version of Adobe Camera Raw. The latest version is ACR 5.6 which brings support for the newest camera models such as:
    Canon EOS 7D, PowerShot S90 & G11, Nikon D3S and others. It’s also backward compatible and will support all earlier models including the EOS5DmkII.
    First you will need to exit Photoshop Elements.
    To get the plug-in for PSE6 go to the link below - instructions are for Windows users. They will differ for Mac users.
    http://www.adobe.com/support/downloads/thankyou.jsp?ftpID=4626&fileID=4303
    Download the plug-in for Elements 8
    Open the zip folder you just downloaded and click Extract Files.
    You should see a 64 bit folder and a plug-in file below it. The plug in has a file name: Camera Raw.8bi
    Now drag the plug-in file (or copy it) into the File Formats folder in the following location:
    C:\Program Files\Adobe\Photoshop Elements 6.0\Plug-Ins\File Formats.  See Gotcha
    If running windows Vista you will probably get a pop-up requesting Administrator permission. Assuming you are the Administrator for your computer, simply agree.
    I can confirm it does work as I have recently updated my plug-in for PSE6 using the above method. To test it, go to one of your photo folders, right click on a raw file (NEF, CR2, DNG etc) and select open with Photoshop Elements. The image should automatically open in ACR 5.6 giving you access to the latest slider adjustments, including white balance and exposure.
    Note: If you have an earlier Camera Raw plug-in, I suggest you move it from the File Formats folder to My Documents before you begin. This will prevent it being overwritten by the new Camera Raw file (it will have the same name) and you can always move it back again if the download installation fails.
    If you are using a 64-bit edition of Windows, then move the plug-in file from the unzipped download folder by navigating to:C:\Program Files (x86)\Adobe\Photoshop Elements 6.0\Plug-Ins\File Formats.

  • Aperture 3 RAW conversion and hot pixel problem

    I've used every version of Aperture since release, but I'm not very happy with the RAW conversion in Aperture3.
    My images from earlier versions have no hot pixel problems but if I update to the new processing I can see them.
    Single red or green pixel in the 100% crop image, that didn't show up before and also don't show up in LR.
    The images I'm importing are NEF files from a Nikon D2x.
    Is this a bug in the new RAW conversion for this camera?
    It makes all of my images now unusable through Aperture if I reprocess them?

    I haven't noticed the pixel issues that you mention, but I wasn't looking for that yet. Instead, my images from my Nikon D300 have been stressing A3 out as follows....
    I have been having new issues with A3 now. I bought A3 when it was 1st available and had all of the same issues that plagued some users, I worked through it and until recently have loved A3.
    While editing I noticed that A3 had a large number of my photos, about 30% of 34,000 images, labeled as being processed under an earlier version (A2). I decided to go ahead and re-reprocess the images, even though this step took a couple of weeks and countless crashes when I first purchased A3. Again, just over a week later, the images are now re-reprocessed within A3. And a new problem cropped up.
    My Macbook is...
    [img]http://jasonksepka.smugmug.com/photos/942470326_QzaME-M.png[/img]
    and when I open A3 and begin looking at my images, the program is slow to respond and when it opens an image I get a very unprocessed version of lines for up to 5 seconds before the image finally loads. The image and all edits do load, but the workflow is significantly effected and I would like to know why this is happening now, and how to fix it. Below is an example of what happens with each image.
    [img]http://jasonksepka.smugmug.com/photos/942470341_Q2WUZ-M.png[/img]

  • RAW Compatibility with Canon 450D

    I have a Canon 450D. I believe the RAW format is not sRAW but the usual RAW (pls correct me if I am wrong). There has been a recent update (May) that is supposed to extend aperture's RAW compatibility to the 450D. However, for me, the files still show up as 'unsupported file format'. For info, the trial version of Lightroom imports these fine. Is there something I am missing or is the update not doing what it is supposed to?

    Support for the 450D was added in May 2008, not May this year.
    http://support.apple.com/downloads/DigitalCamera_RAW_Compatibility_Update_21
    As far as I know, the 450D doesn't have the option of shooting in SRAW format anyway, so if your OS is up to date I don't know why you're getting that message.
    Ian

  • Camera RAW issues with Canon T4i

    I have many, many cameras and have used Photoshop and Bridge for years.  Even though the latest updates for Camera RAW says it can handle the T4i, I tried opening these files on two separate computers, both running Win 7 64 bit, and my having Photoshop Extended 5+ 64 bit on both computers.
    I tried reformatting the camera card, wanting to eliminate that as a possible problem, and the same problem exists.
    Camera RAW will recognize all of my other cameras, the D Mark III, T3i, Nikon D2x, D3, D3X, so on and so forth, but not the T4i.
    I stopped short of doing an image restore on that machine, thinking my installation of Photoshop must have been corrupted when I removed Elements and Preimere Elements, but no...I'm now on an IBM W701 with the same software and I have the same probem.
    If someone from Adobe would like me to send them a file from the T4i, I will.  If I shoot in jpeg, there are no issues.  But I do not shoot in jpeg.  I only did it to see if perhaps it were the SD card.
    Any help would be appreciated.

    With Photoshop CS5 (I think that's what you said) you no longer have access to the latest updates for Camera Raw.
    Photoshop CS5 can only take up to Camera Raw 6.7 (latest version is 7.1, which goes with Photoshop CS6 only). 
    You'll either need to upgrade to Photoshop CS6 or download the free DNG converter and go through the extra step of converting your T4i images to DNG before opening them in Camera Raw 6.7.
    You can see what versions of Camera Raw support what cameras here:
    http://helpx.adobe.com/creative-suite/kb/camera-raw-plug-supported-cameras.html
    And you can see what versions of Camera Raw go with what versions of Photoshop here:
    http://helpx.adobe.com/x-productkb/global/camera-raw-compatible-applications.html
    -Noel

  • Having problems with Canon Raw / Jpeg with Canon 5D

    I have been noticing every time I open up a Raw file in CS2 the colors seem to be off and when I open up the Jpeg pic. they are compleatley different.  The Jpeg files colors really pop, where the Raw files look blowen out and take a lot of work in editing.
    What am I doing wrong?  Do I need to upgrade to the CS4 package?  Or is it a camera setting that I am missing?
    When I was shooting a Canon 10D both Raw and Jpeg were the same and the colors were good.  Thanks Keig

    What you are seeing is the difference between how Canon develops the images and how Adobe develops the image (in CS2).  Your options are somewhat limited in CS2 but you can try the following:
    Open up a 5D image in Camera Raw.
    Make adjustments to make the image look as close to the Jpeg as you can.  This will probably mean adding some contrast, upping the shadows/blacks clipping point, and adding some saturation.
    Save those settings as a new Camera Raw default.  I don't remember if that is in the same place it is now ("Save new camera raw default" from the fly-out menu on the tab bar) but look around and you should find it.
    The hardest part will be trying to get a good match on the color.  An upgrade to CS4 would give you many enhancements to Camera Raw, including new Canon-like profiles that will give you 5D color similar to what you get in-camera or from Canon's Digital Photo Professional software.
    Hope that helps.

  • Update RAW conversion for Canon 70D file to CS6

    I've tried several times to update my RAW converter to allow editing of the Canon 70D CR2 file in Photoshop (MAC, CS6), but each time Photoshop gives the message that I should get the latest Camera Raw update.  My Bridge Preference menu indicates that I have 7.1.0.354.  My last attempts were updating to AdobeCameraRaw-7.1-mul-AdobeUpdate and then DNGConverter_7_3.  Both installed without issue, but the problem persists.

    The current version of ACR for CS6 is version 8.6 Link to DNG converter contains ARC 8.6 and Converter.
    Mac - http://www.adobe.com/support/downloads/detail.jsp?ftpID=5824
    Win - http://www.adobe.com/support/downloads/detail.jsp?ftpID=5825

  • RAW Processing with Canon 5D Mark iii

    Since upgrading to Aperture 3.3.1 I started to notice a huge decrease in the sharpness of my images. I have checked previous threads and followed up on my Highlight Tone priority settings as well as Post Import Raw Process setting. Having messed around with both settings I have been unable to fix this issue. So I went ahead and downloaded a copy of Lightroom to test. Images imported into lightroom at full 1:1 previews are sharp as a tack. What could be causing my issue with Aperture. I do not want to have to switch but at this point I might not have a choice.
    I am importing mRAW files without JPG and applying no Presets. The first time I click on the image it initially loads sharp and then after a split second it becomes "blurry"
    Any one else seeing this issue still and have any advice?
    Shooting with a Canon 5D MK3.
    Thanks
    Brad

    Wish I had an answer here, but I will caution about mRAW files.  I wouldn't use them, as they are the "red-headed stepchild" of RAW files.  They are not true RAW files, and Aperture's support for them came much later than regular RAW files.
    I'd recommend shooting regular RAW files and just deleting more of the non-keepers if space is an actual consideration.
    Here's an article that goes into details (mostly on sRAW, but mRAW is the same thing, pretty much):
    http://dougkerr.net/Pumpkin/articles/sRaw.pdf

  • Importing geotagged jpeg and raw photos with xmp files issue

    I had a folder of photos (all unique, no dupes) from two different cameras. Some were .jpg and some .cr2 (raw). I used an external app on my Mac 10.6.x called PhotoLinker to geotag the photos based on gpx track files. I wrote the metadata out to .xmp files, done by that app. So then I had a folder with .jpg, .cr2 and .xmp files I then moved them to another volume and did an Import Move operation in LR3.  For the raw images, all went fine.  The images were pulled into LR and they each had the geotagged data for location. But for the jpeg images they were imported into the catalog in LR but none of them had any geotagged data for the location.
    Can someone let me know if they have encountered this problem and what they did about it?  Is this a bug?
    I even selected one of the JPG files in LR grid view, then did a read of the metadata from a file. The upper left corner displayed that the metadata file was being loaded from XMP.  But again, no geotagged information. If I load that same .xmp file back into PhotoLinker it shows the geotagged data still there.
    What gives?  Why is this happening?
    What I am using...
    Mac OS 10.6.8
    PhotoLinker 2.2.9
    Lightroom 3.4.1

    Thanks for the response and answer, Ian.
    That strikes me as really odd. I realize that jpgs can have metadata within the image file and maybe the issue for LR is which does it consider to have priority. However, if so, why not present a dialog asking the user?
    I would suggest Adobe plan on filling the gapping hole LR has when it comes to geotagging support. It currently provides very minimal support.

Maybe you are looking for

  • CS4 Master Collection partial inoperability

    Half of applications from CS4(acrobat, illustrator, fireworks, indesign etc.) crashes when i'm trying to run it on my pc. I have Vista 64x.

  • Need Cisco Jabber Client in personal profile

    Cisco Jabber earlier it was there in appstore for BB8520 but after I done research I found that it was available now for Enterprise But problem here was I cannot enable workspace as currently our company or my client does not have BlackBerry Enterpri

  • 32DT1U HDTV: HDMI to Laptop, Sound to External Speakers?

    Hello, I have a 32DT1U Toshiba HDTV and I am trying to connect my laptop to the TV via an HDMI cable but I want the sound to go to external speakers. Is there any way of doing this? When I have the HDMI cable connected from the laptop to the TV and a

  • Weird Slideshow Transition Anomaly In iPhoto '08 (version 7.1)

    Exporting my slide show in iPhoto '08 to QT ; movie size large, half way through the movie, the page flip transitions begin with a strange grey overlay first. This doesnt happen with the same transitions in the first part of the exported movie. This

  • Office 2007 Documents Keep asking for credentials

    Hi All Gurus - Is there any issue with SP 2013 and Office 2007? We are trying to access office documents using IE 11, it prompts for credentials first time after compture reboot. Once given credentials it works fine whole day. but users who reboot th