Aperture 3 Export Watermarks Broken?

I've upgraded to Aperture 3 and I have re-added the watermarks that I used to use under Aperture 2 to the export presets. The watermarks that I have built are sized to fit into the lower right corner (i.e., 128 x 128 for a 2048 x 2048 export). When using those watermarks, they appear to be scaled up to the size of the photo (instead of just overlaid in the lower right 128 x 128 pixels). If I turn on "Scale watermark, the watermark comes out smaller but still about double size (i.e., about 256 x 256).
Is anyone else having this problem? Should I be creating a 2048 x 2048 watermark to get the scaling correct? Is export watermarking broken in Aperture 3?

yes it definitely seems broken. i have a PSD file that is my watermark with just the text "(c) scott nichol * www.silverystars.com" and its about 500 pixels wide. when i export for the web its usually an 800-1000 pixel wide image and the water mark is pinned to the lower right or left hand corers. if i leave "scaling" off, that 500-pixel wide watermark image is stretched across the entire bottom of the image. if i turn scaling on, its scaled down to an almost micro text size that's barely readable. and it doesn't matter how wide i make the image, it gets scaled down to the same size.
my work-around for now is to keep the text in the PSD document the same size and extend the canvas so there's about 700 pixels of padding to the left of the text. now if i leave scaling off it fits that 1200-pixel wide image into the bottom of the image. and since the exports are only 800-1000 pixels wide, the watermark is about as big as it was before.
clearly this is a bug and this can work for me in the short term.
scott

Similar Messages

Aperture export to Photoshop error

Hi all,
This is a bit of a very specialised issue that I noticed - so only an issue for the very high end user. But big enough of a problem that I have to change to Lightroom until this issue is fixed...
Following Problem statement. I get an error in calcutions in advanced Alpha Channel Masking... see attached images to understand the problem
Here is what I do to get the Alpha Mask:
1) From Aperture export Image to Photoshop
2) You want to calculate a certain coloured area to do some very subtle editing - say a skin rash
3) You select Green Channel for highest contrast between rash and skin
4) You go in Calculations and on merged layers in inverted mode you do a multiply calculation into a new selection
5) You get a selection. You want to refine it
6) You do calculations again and this time on the selection layers (not inverted) you do an overlay calculations into a new channel
You see that the Mask has square patches - misaligned information ...
I don't understand what they are because when you look in RGB there is no error.
Also note that this must be related to Aperture - because when I import the .NEF file directly from the camera into Photoshop or via Lightroom I don't get this issue.
(I am using a NIKON D700)
Second more minor but annoying issue - skin colours are way more yellowish than in Lightroom ...
Can anyone fix this or point to how it can be fixed? Should Apple be notified?

I also wanted to add an image of how the masks looks like - i.e. without issues - when you import into Photoshop via Lightroom

Poor quality conversion/downsizing with Aperture Export

I have noticed a difference in quality of exported JPG files, depending on if I downsize them manually, ahead of time, using an external editor (PSE) or if I let Aperture downsize them during export. The images downsized in PSE are noticeably sharper than the ones downsized by Aperture. Originals are high res JPG files from my D90 that I have converted to TIFF and touched up using PSE as an external editor. I would like to keep the full size, adjusted TIFF file as a master and just export to whatever size JPG is needed at the time. With the low quality Aperture exports (compared to downsizing first in PSE), I am having to individually downsize each TIFF in PSE prior to exporting as a JPG in “original size” mode (vs. letting Aperture handle the downsizing). Has anyone else noticed this degradation when exporting/downsizing in Aperture2? Is there any work around? Any comments would be appreciated! Thanks! (All export was done in JPG quality 10, with no pre-sharpening performed.)

Firstly, using window>show movie info, find out what the current bit rate is of the original movie.
When you come to export, keep the bit rate as close as possible to the original bit rate, keep the resolution the same as well as the frame rate. You should hopefully get much better quality.

Exporting Watermark in Aperture 2.1

I am exporting pictures as a jpg at level 12 quality. The pictures have been cropped as 4 x 6" size images. I have created a watermark file in photoshop and saved as a psd file. When I export the 4 images the watermark is a different size on each of the 4 images. I have also tried clicking the scale watermark checkbox and all have a different size watermark. Any suggestions. Thanks

juiceejuice wrote:
Does anyone know how to create a watermark using aperture 2.1.1? I know how to select it when exporting the picture, but I don't know how to create an actual watermark. thanks.
I had good success using the tutorial here:
http://www.kremalicious.com/2008/05/high-quality-watermarks-with-aperture/
Cheers.
PJP

Aperture 3: Watermarks with Facebook, Flickr, and MobileMe

I am pleased that Apple has released Aperture 3. I have not had the chance to download the 30-day trial or play with it in an Apple store yet. For those of you who have, do you know if Apple has enabled (visible) watermarking as part of the sharing on Facebook, Flickr, and MobileMe? I don't post images without visible watermarks to the Internet without one.
What I currently do with Aperture 2.x is export the images (as .jpg) into a folder adding a watermark as part of the export preset, then import them back into Aperture and then post to MobileMe, Facebook, or Flickr. I am hoping that Aperture 3 eliminates the need for these extra steps.
If it doesn't have this ability, does anyone do anything similar that might be more streamlined?

Thank you folks for your suggestions. I just purchased Aperture 3 and needed to create a watermark. I was able to accomplish this using the steps below.
1. Scan the watermark into the computer or create it with an editing application. (I scanned my signature into my computer and saved it as a jpg. If you are worried about someone having your signature you may want to use a printed watermark.)
2. Open the scanned image in a photo editing application. (I used Photoshop even though I am very uncomfortable with its complexity.)
3. Adjust the size of the image using the," Image Size", tool under "Image" column in the Menu. (Do not use the Canvas Size tool. It did not work for me.)
4. Place the Layers palette on the desktop by selecting, "Layers" in the Window column at the end of the Menu.
5. Double click on the background icon in the Layers palette to open a new layer. It should be Layer 0.
6. Click, "OK".
7. Next select the Magic Wand in the tools palette and touch the background of the image. Click on the background to select the background. Click delete to make the the background disappear. The watermark should remain without the background.
8. If there are any areas enclosed in a loop, like a zero or, "O", take the magic wand and select the enclosed area to highlight it. Remove this area with the delete button. You can put the copyright mark on the image if you like by typing it next to your watermark.
9. Go to, "Save As", and save the image as a psd file where you can find it.
10. Quit the application and open Aperture and go to the preference folder for Aperture.
11. Select the Export icon and activate the, "Email photo export", preset button.
12. Select edit and go to, "Choose Image", to select your watermark with the transparent background.
13. Select a new preset on the right and name your new watermark.
14. The new watermark will appear in the, "Email photo export" options.

Aperture 3 watermarks

1. Trying to export some photos with watermarks but have problems with it.
My signature (watermark) is a one-layer PSD file with some transparency and it works fine in A2.
As for A3 - it scales watermark up to an unaffordable size on photo. Even when I am sizing signature resolution down, A3 scales it up again. Tried different types of files (TIFF, BMP, JPEG) - the same thing.
2. Also I've noticed that when I slide the 'Opacity' slider in the 'Image Export' window, the watermark doesn't dynamically changes the opacity in the example window as it was in A2, though it applies on the exported image anyway.
3. The last thing is that if you have both A2 and A3 on the machine and you use them one after another, Image Export presets lose their watermark settings so you have to adjust settings over and over again.
Does anyone have these problems?

Yes, if I leave "scale watermark" unselected, the watermark scales up to fill the width of the exported image. If I select "scale watermark", the watermark decreases in size by about 40%--also not what I was looking for!
I have reported these bugs to Apple using Aperture > Provide Feedback...
And yes, the preview no longer shows opacity changes.
Haven't tried reverting to A2 yet. Thanks for the heads up on the problems I may see!

Can't find IPTC metadata after Aperture export into Lightroom

Hi all,
I'm sure you've already worked through this pain, so maybe you'll have some insight for me:
I am exporting approximately 25,000 images from Aperture 2.1.4 and importing them into Lightroom 4. I started working with my small projects of about 300 images to test. From Aperture, I exported the Master files with the Sidecar (IPTC4.XMP) files. [My masters are a mix of .jpgs and .NEF, and I read that the jpgs don't always carry the meta data through]. I successfully imported the master files into Lightroom and ran the "Read Metadata from File" command. I also exported the keywords file from Aperture and imported those into Lightroom as well.
Prior to exporting, I edited one file in Aperture by entering "test caption", "test location", "test keyword", "test copyright" etc. into several of the IPTC fields. These fields are NOT appearing in the equivalent Lightroom fields. I checked the .XMP file (using text edit) and it does contain the correct "test values". I am getting all of the EXIF metadata, but none of my custom values.
Is it as simple as not looking in the right place in Lightroom for my values?

John, and Brent -
Yes, thank you, you were both right. Here is an updated screenshot showing the image in both applications, with the metadata where I expected it. The trick, in my case, was to follow "Method 1" in the link above, to write the IPTC data into the .jpgs. I'll use the sidecar method for the .NEFs, probably. Also, expanding the fields proved that the keyword was present. I'm sure I can mess around with the Display Metadata options from Default to other things. All well; heroes to the rescue!
Regards,
Grace

DPI and PPI in Aperture 'Export' and 'Print' windows

Hi,
As mentioned in an earlier post, I just bought an Epson 3880 printer and some Epson Hot Press paper, so now I have to pay attention to PPI (term used for displays) and DPI (term used for printers).
In Aperture however, files being exported require DPI specs(!), while files being printed require that we specify PPI specs. How is that?
Also, my Epson manual indicates that I can print at 5 distinct "DPI" settings, from 180 to 2880. My Aperture Print window, however, only offers 3 options with 360 "PPI" as the highest (considered Draft quality by Epson - if "DPI"), plus a 4th referred to as Custom.
Also, I have a note jotted down a while back that says: "1440 dpi for most papers with 240 dpi files, at 2880 if 360" - whatever that meant 6 months ago at an Epson 3880 seminar, before I got the printer.
Can you guys sort this out for me? Please?
Thanks a lot,
Raphael

I'm not at my studio. My current driver is 8.x. The newest driver is 9.33. My remarks here may not fit with your more current version of the driver (but that would surprise me — the printer came out about 4 years ago, iirc).
The profiles are not, afaik, included with the driver, at least when you download it from Epson's site.
There are two profiles for each Epson Fine Art paper — one at 1440 and one at 2880. You should try each with every kind of print you make, and determine which is better. IME, _for my needs_, 2880 was never worse. I use the 2880 profiles.
The profile is selected from the "Color Profile" drop-down at the top of the "Rendering" section of Aperture's "Print" dialog.
(Set "Render Intent" to "Perceptual" for, in general, photographs or anything with smoothly graduated changes in color. Set "Render Intent" to "Relative Colorimetric" for, in general, graphics or anything with smooth areas of constant color and sharp transitions between areas of color. Generally, if "Render Intent" is "Perceptual", check "Black Point Compensation"; otherwise uncheck it.)
Leave "Print Resolution" at "Auto". I know of no reason to ever change this. (I don't, in fact, know what this control does, and have never changed it.)
When you click "Print" in Aperture's "Print" dialog, a short dialog opens asking you if you want to save any changes you made to your Preset. I always save my changes. Prints often need to be immediately remade — all transitions of data from electronic to physical media are problematic — and I like to return to my Preset ready to print the same Image(s) again.
When that dialog closes, the OS print dialog opens. Your 3880 printer should already be selected in the "Printer" drop-down. You need to create and should save an OS Preset for your paper. Note that on the "Color Matching" page (this dialog has pages, not tabs; direct complaints to Cupertino), all (two) options should be grayed-out. This indicates that Aperture is handling color matching, which is what you want (for best prints and anything approaching a color-calibrated workflow). On the "Paper Handling" page, the "Destination Paper Size" drop-down is grayed-out, but should show you the selection you made in the Aperture Print dialog. The "Printer Settings" page has two tabs. On the "Basic" tab, in the "Media Type" drop-down, select your paper ("Fine Art Paper ▹ Hot Press [Bright or Natural])*. The "Ink" drop-down should be grayed-out, but show "Matte". Matte is proper selection for Hot Press [Bright or Natural]. This dialog knows this from your color profile selection in the Aperture Print dialog. Chose "16-bit" output and any other options your want (you can experiment; I find no difference). I ignore the warning about print quality at the bottom area — this has never been an issue. On the "Advanced" tab of the "Printer Settings" page, it should tell you that "Epson Driver Color Management is Off". That's what you want. You want Aperture to manage the color.
Save your OS print dialog Preset. Use it every time you print to the same paper.
*If you cannot select your paper, you have not selected the correct paper size in the "Printer" section of Aperture's Print dialog. Note that the "Paper Size" selection includes not only the paper size, but also whether the feed is by sheet-feeder or manual, and whether or not the print is borderless. (I didn't design this; I assume there are reasons to have shoe-horned these options into the "Paper Size" selection.
This is all tricky on top of being actually complex and next to being new. It takes everyone time and mistakes (read: ink and paper) to canalize a flow that works for producing the prints they want. I hope this gets you there a little faster. Report back with what doesn't work.
—Kirby.

Aperture export is not working, "Choose" buttons also not reacting

Suddenly I can't export versions, originals, metadata and export as library anymore. Also all "Choose" buttons do not react anymore. For example its not possible to open another Library or choose the external photo editor in Preferences. If I login with my second useraccount Aperture does work just fine.
On Monday I had no problems at all. Sofar I did the following things:
FIRST.
Repair Diskpermissions and Verify disk which was OK.
Moved to desktop following files:
~/Library/Preferences/com.apple.Aperture
~/Library/Caches/com.apple.Apertue
~/Library/Containers/com.apple.Aperture
Emptied the trash and restarted. The problem is not solved.
SECOND.
All the above actions and restart.
Aperture Photolibrary first aid, "Repair Permissins" , "Repair Database" and "Rebuild Database".
The problem is not solved.
THIRD.
Uninstalled Aperture and removed all files containing the frase "Aperture" (as far as these files had any connection with the application).
Repair Diskpermissions and Verify disk which was OK.
Emptied the trash and restarted.
Installed Aperture from DVD and update via Apstore.
Still the same problems so I am asking the form members for help.
Mathieu

Are you having any troubles wiht other applications run from this account?
From what you wrote you seemed to have covered all the bases not sure what else to suggest. What is the system?
Do you have any plugins installed in Aperture ? What about any applications, plugins etc, for this account?
You can try doing a safe boot (hold the shift key down as soon as you hear the start up chime. Hod it until the Apple appears on the screen) Safe boot takes longer to come up, there will be a status bar at the bottom of the screen while it boots. Once it is up you will see Safe Boot in red letters at the top of the screen on the login page. This might not work if you have File Vault turned on.
Once booted in Safe mode log in. Aperture use to not run in Safe mode because the graphics card is restricted but I believe in 3.5. it will run. Note everything will be slow and jerky.
See if that makes a difference. Once done testing boot normally and try it again.

Aperture Export Folder exports entire project

Hi,
I have a project - in this case called Kenya after a trip we took a couple of years ago. I have a folder under Kenya called Best - that I wanted to export to a new library (trying to consolidate some of the best photos from a few trips to make it easy to show slideshows on AppleTV).
The export worked - and it did create a new library with the folder in it - but instead of just copying the 300 photos in the Best folder, it copied all 8500 photos from the project (or in other words, the entire library).
Is there a way to do the export so it only copies the specific photos in the folder? I didn't see a way to control any of this in the export dialogue. And I did do the export action from the Best folder.
Any suggestions?
Thanks,
Adam

Adam Greenspan wrote:
I wanted to export to a new library (trying to consolidate some of the best photos from a few trips to make it easy to show slideshows on AppleTV).
Hi Adam. Léonie has answered your question (or is leading you towards an answer). I wanted to mention that your goal can be accomplished easily without exporting (as long as all the Images are in one Library, which is the recommended set-up). If you detail your current set-up and workflow, I suspect we can offer some helpful simplifications and improvements.
Here is a concise to the parts of Aperture, including, of course, Folders.

Export queue broken in 1.3

Because of our filing system and workflow, I am used to breaking up a big shoot into multiple folders. I then 'develop' each folder, and for performance reasons, wait until the evening and then queue up all the images for export to JPEG.
It worked fine in LR1.2, but is broken in LR1.3.
Adding multiple export streams to the queue makes the whole export process lockup, with an "unable to export" message for each export stream.
So I have to queue up each folder individually, maybe a max of 2 folders at a time, and wait around before I can add another folder to the queue.
All done locally, Windows XP.
I would not recommend to anybody thatthey 'upgrade' to LR1.3 unless they have to for camera support.

Thanks for offering some troubleshooting advise. I do have a standard, unaltered account. I rebooted and logged into that account and had the exact same results. So this is system wide.
Just for kicks I tried the similar feature in IE and those modified clicks are still working so this seems to be a Safari specific problem, not a keyboard or mouse problem.

Aperture Exporting JPEG's from RAW: file size and quality questions?

Hey Everyone,
So, I'm using Aperture 2 and I've got some questions about exporting from RAW to JPEG. I shoot with a Nikon D70 so original RAW files are 5-6mb in size. After doing some basic post processing when I export the pics at "full size" with picture quality of 11 out of 12 then the resulting JPEG is about half the file size of the original RAW file. For example a 5.6mb RAW becomes a 2.6mb JPEG. The resolution in pixels per inch and and the overall image size remain unchanged. Have I lost picture quality due to the exporting JPEG being smaller in file size?
My friend who works with me prefers to edit in Photoshop and when he follows the same workflow his saved JPEG from the identical RAW file in Photoshop is minimally smaller in file size, say 5.6mb to 5.3mb. He's telling me that my Aperture edited photos are losing quality and resolution.
Is he right, are my pics of lesser quality due to being a smaller file size? I've always been told that the quality of a picture is not in the mbs, but the pixel density.
I've bee told that Aperture has a better compression engine and that the resulting files are of the exact same quality because the PPI and image size are the same. Is that what explains the much smaller file sizes in Aperture?
I tried changing the picture quality in the export menu to 12 out of 12, but the resulting JPEG then becomes larger than the original RAW at over 7mbs.
Can someone please help me understand this better? I don't want to lose picture quality if that is indeed what is happening.
Thanks in advance for your help.

mscriv wrote:
So, I'm using Aperture 2 and I've got some questions about exporting from RAW to JPEG. I shoot with a Nikon D70 so original RAW files are 5-6mb in size. After doing some basic post processing when I export the pics at "full size" with picture quality of 11 out of 12 then the resulting JPEG is about half the file size of the original RAW file. For example a 5.6mb RAW becomes a 2.6mb JPEG. The resolution in pixels per inch and and the overall image size remain unchanged. Have I lost picture quality due to the exporting JPEG being smaller in file size?
JPEG is a "lossy" file compression algorithm. Whether Aperture or PS, *every time a JPEG is saved some loss occurs*, albeit minimal at the 11 or 12 level of save, huge losses at low save levels. Some images (sky, straight diagonal lines, etc.) are more vulnerable to showing visible jpeg artifacts.
My friend who works with me prefers to edit in Photoshop and when he follows the same workflow his saved JPEG from the identical RAW file in Photoshop is minimally smaller in file size, say 5.6mb to 5.3mb. He's telling me that my Aperture edited photos are losing quality and resolution.
*Both of you are losing image data when you save to jpeg.* IMO the differences between the apps is probably just how the apps work rather than actually losing significantly more data. The real image data loss is in using JPEG at all!
Is he right, are my pics of lesser quality due to being a smaller file size?
I doubt it.
I've always been told that the quality of a picture is not in the mbs, but the pixel density.
The issue here is not how many pixels (because you are not varying that) but how much data each pixel contains. In this case once you avoid lossy JPEG the quality mostly has to do with different RAW conversion algorithms. Apple and Adobe both guess what Nikon is up to with the proprietary RAW NEF files and the results are different from ACR to Apple to Nikon. For my D2x pix I like Nikon's conversions the best (but Nikon software is hard to use), Aperture second and Adobe ACR (what Photoshop/Bridge uses) third. I 98% use Aperture.
I tried changing the picture quality in the export menu to 12 out of 12, but the resulting JPEG then becomes larger than the original RAW at over 7mbs. Can someone please help me understand this better? I don't want to lose picture quality if that is indeed what is happening.
JPEG is a useful format but lossy. Only use it as a _last step_ when you must save files size for some reason and are willing to accept the by-definition loss of image data to obtain smaller files (such as for web work or other on-screen viewing). Otherwise (especially for printing) save as TIFF or PSD which are non-lossy file types, but larger.
As to the Aperture vs. ACR argument, RAW-convert the same original both ways, save as TIFF and see if your eyes/brain significantly prefer one over the other. Nikon, Canon etc. keep proprietary original image capture data algorithms secret and each individual camera's RAW conversion is different.
HTH
-Allen

Aperture - Export the edited images with changes

Hello
I recently purchased Aperture and have a SLR camera (Pentax K-X) and a GPS logger (Holux M-241). I record my images in DNG format (Adobe RAW format).
I've tried to import my images into Aperture, where I've added commentary and edited my pictures. Now I would like to export my photos (originals), where I can either save images as "Include IPTC" or "Create IPTC4XMP sidecar file". I might have saved my comments, but the changes I've made the pictures are not appearing when I imported the images again from the folder where I have exported my edited images (related to exports, I have chosen "Create IPTC4XMP sidecar file "). Why can not I see my edited photos?
Is it not possible to save the XMP sidecar file as embedded in your DNG files, which I know you can do with Adobe Photoshop?

What you want to do is a contradiction in itself - in Aperture you either export the originals or the versions. The originals will give you exactly the original images that you imported, optionally with IPTC added annotions, but without edits.
If you want to export the edited image, you will have to render the edited version and to export a version, not an original. You have many presets for the format of the edited version to choose from, but not a raw format. The closest you can get will be exporting as tiff or psd original size.
Regards
Léonie

Aperture exports jpeg files larger than original RAW files

Can anyone tell me why a RAW file (10.6mb), when exported as a jpeg (10.8mb) from Aperture ends up larger than the original RAW file. The same RAW file when opened and then saved as a jpeg (6.4mb) in Photoshop is a lot smaller. The photo dimensions and resolution are the same in both saved files (34.5mb open file 300dpi 4256 x 2831 pix). I have tried this on several photos, all with similar results. For information I am saving the photos in both Photoshop and Aperture at 300dpi, original size and at a quality setting of 12. In these examples/tests I have done no work to the photos, obviously the file sizes increase after work has been carried out on the photos (in both Ps & Aperture)
Almost doubling the size of saved jpegs has a massive implication on my library and may be one reason to consider Adobe Lightroom as this gives similar jpeg file sizes as Photoshop, i.e. almost half the size of the original RAW file
Reducing the quality setting on saved jpegs is an obvious way to reduce file size, but not answering the question of the considerable discrepancy when saving to the same quality in different software
Is this a feature of Aperture and nothing can be done about it ? I would prefer to use Aperture but cannot cope with the large jpeg sizes !
Any comments would be much appreciated - thank you
Nick

Think you might be right Allen - The 12 quality saved jpegs seem to be pretty high quality, closer to the original than maybe the files saved in Ps at quality 12. I have just run an identical set of processing actions on all the files in Photoshop and the jpegs previously saved in Aperture at 12, 11 and even 8 quality settings seem to be better than the same files saved at 12 in Ps
Bizarrely the file size drops from 10.6mb at quality setting 12 in Aperture, to 3.2mb when saved just one notch down at quality setting 11 in Aperture. That is a massive drop, esp considering the next one down, saving at quality 10 results in a 2.8mb file
rw just ran some checks and tests on the file export settings and file sizes in Aperture, on a file I sent him, and we get the same results. So at least my version of Aperture is not up the wall !!
Would be useful to have the explanations from Apple as to the vast variance in settings and file sizes, but I guess we will just have to keep guessing - and buying more and more hard drives for all the large files
I am considering keeping the RAW originals in future, and I suppose in this case I need only save smaller jpegs, and issue at whatever size they are needed at the time - just needs a bit of planning to look after an ever increasing collection, which is about to have two sets of images added at a time now. Added to the already amassed 80 000 images at last count !)
Thanks
Nick

Aperture exported version "could not be opened because it is empty"

I just upgraded Aperture today. It seemed to work well for editing the first 40+ photos. I could make edits and, if desired, export the version to a USB drive. After exporting about 10 photos succesfully, the process stopped working. I did not change my process at all, but all subsequent exported photos have either had a grey picture thumbnail that opens as a solid grey picture or have had a generic "jpeg" thumbnail about which an error box opens stating, "The file xxx.jpg could not be opended because it is empty." Does anyone know what the problem is?

Once again
This is not the first time I've gotten this error message after using iPhoto. Before I post photos online, I edit them in iPhoto. Then, for the ease of uploading, I transfer them all to a folder I create on the desktop, and upload directly from there.
HOw do you do this?
We can try to help but we must know what is going on and what you have done - exactly How are you transferring the photos to a folder?
It doesnt work that way either. Idk why. And I don't want to upload every single picture, just certain ones.
And again - how does it not work?
And using the media browser you select individual photos - you do not have to "upload every single picture"
And now when I click on certain photos to enlarge them in iPhoto, the screen turns black; the picture disappears.
And once again - what does this mean? Does a large ! appear or exactly what happens
Ugh. There seems to be some sort of glitch, but I dont know.
help us out and we can help you -we just are not mind readers
and there are no "glitches" like this in iPhoto - it is probably either user error or a data problem
LN

Aperture 3 Export Watermarks Broken?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for