Aperture 3 only runs 32 bit.....hov to get 64 bit ?

Perculiar.
I had Aperture 2, bought the upgrade to 3. Installed and upgraded AP2-library to AP3.
Running 10.6.2 on mbp unibody 4gb ram and also the Imac in my signature, same happens in both computers.
When i right click on aperture.app, show info, i cant do the checkmark 32 bit, this option is not shown in the info-pane. (a friend of mine installed the trial version, he have the option...)
Further, when i go through "about this mac", choose software, applications, then aperture, it says "no" to 64 bit
(Beside of that for both systems aperture are slow/unstable...)

OK,
Just found another topic talking about the same.
http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?threadID=2336697&stqc=true

Similar Messages

I want to run Photoshop and Light room on my mac, but I'm worried that osx only running eight bits of color will lead to lower quality picture results. Should I stick with Windows?

The headline sums it up. Will running the programs in Windows result in better pictures? Do professionals do touch ups on Mac? Thanks for your responses! I'm new to this.

"Deep colour" - meaning a 10bit colour driven display - can only be achieved in hardware with a screen and a graphics card that support both. The average Windows system does not support this - few do. Only Windows workstation level graphics cards from AMD and Nvidia support this option. These are generally more expensive than consumer cards of the same caliber.
Many screens with so-called 10bit support often fake the extra colours by introducing dithering - true 10bit displays are only manufactured by companies such as Eizo - and they are expensive: prices range to around almost $2000 for a 24" 10-bit screen from Eizo. You also need a special HDMI cable, I believe.
Also, the software must support a 10bit workflow. These are far and between. I believe even Lightroom still does not support this - Photoshop does from version CS5 and up.
If you have a hard time understanding all this: no worries. The reason why you are confused and worried is because you lack the know-how, and, subsequently, reading all that "10bit colour is unsupported on Macs" made you anxious.
In reality, while Windows does support this (and Macs do not), almost no-one uses it currently (beyond high-end film/FX work, cad/cam, and a couple of high end Photographers). Any generic consumer and even most workstation level Windows machines will not support it unless all the hardware and software is properly set up. And it is very costly. Colour management becomes even more intricate with 10bit displays.
In a nutshell: much ado about nothing. A Mac is great for design work, as are well equipped Windows machines. By far the majority of professionals in Photography, Graphic design, Video and Effects editing, and so on, currently work without 10bit hardware, and produce outstanding work.
Unless you are spending at least around $2000 on screen hardware, and limit yourself to a very small group of applications that also cost an arm and a leg, you are not going to be able to use 10bit on Windows either.
You can forget what you have read - it is of no consequence to you. (or if you are interested, learn the technical backgrounds.) Perhaps in 10~20 years the situation will have changed.

I keep getting message "This page requires a plugin that can only run in 32 bit mode" what does this mean and how can I fix it?

I keep getting message "This page requires a plugin that can only run in 32 bit mode" what does this mean and how can I fix it? It seems to come up randomly, but I'm fairly ignorant.

Previous versions of Firefox were only 32 bit, Firefox 4 for the Mac contains 32 and 64 bit versions. If you want to always start Firefox in 32 bit mode, open up Finder and go to the Applications folder. Control-click the Firefox app and click "Get Info", then select the "Open in 32-bit mode" option.

Only Pentium 3's do not support running 64 bit operating systems Or there are others processors as well

Hi,
I was told that 'Unfortunately Pentium 3's do not support running 64 bit operating systems.'
However, I really noticed many other people say that I should run a hardware reading program, such as 'SecurAble' to be sure that my processor will be capable to run 64Bit operating systems or not.
Thus, if [b]only Pentium 3's [/b]do not support running 64 bit operating systems, then there is no need from running such a program(screen shot below).
I really run this program using Windows 7(64Bit) with HP Laptop Core i5. And this is the reslut:
64-Bit Processing Available
This processor does offer 64-bit modes of operation. This means that this system is able to run the significantly more secure 64-bit versions of Microsoft's Windows XP and Vista operating systems.
The biggest challenge for 64-bit Windows systems is the fact that existing 32-bit device drivers cannot be used by the 64-bit operating system kernel. So if you do plan to try switching to 64-bit Windows, you should be sure to have a means for reverting
to 32-bit operation if your system's hardware turns out to be incompatible with 64-bit operation. Many people have reverted to 32-bit operation after bravely giving 64-bits a try for a short time.
A man should convert his anger and sadness into strength to continue living in this life.

Pentium 4 CPU s may or may not be 64bit capable depending on the specific model. Intel introduced 64bit versions after a number of 32bit only models. All mainstream later Intel CPU's are 64bit capable. The Atom processor may be 32 or 64 bit capable.
There is similar path with AMD CPU's, e.g. early Athlons were 32bit only, with later models 64 bit capable.

Error message says "This page requires a plugin that can only run in 32-bit mode"

When I try to write an email from my BT site I get the following message
"This page requires a plugin that can only run in 32-bit mode"
Then there's a link to restart the page in 32-bit mode. However, it resets to whole page, drags things back out the trash.
I have only had this problem since updating to the latest Firefox

Previous versions of Firefox were only 32 bit, Firefox 4 for the Mac contains 32 and 64 bit versions. If you want to always start Firefox in 32 bit mode, open up Finder and go to the Applications folder. Control-click the Firefox app and click "Get Info", then select the "Open in 32-bit mode" option.

I imported a COMPLETED book project into Aperture 3, only to discover that the resolution of all the photos has been reduced to totally unacceptable levels

I imported a COMPLETED book project into Aperture 3, only to discover that the resolution of all the photos has been reduced to totally unacceptable levels. Any easy solution?
Steps:
1. I finished an Aperture 2 (Two) book project and tried to submit it to Apple for printing. At that point I learned (belatedly, obviously) that Apple no longer accepts books from Aperture 2. I don't know how I would have known to even ask if Aperture 2 had been sunsetted as far as book projects go.
2. So I tried to download Aperture 3 ($79.99), only to be told that I couldn't download Aperture 3.5.1 because I was still running OSX 10.8.x. So I read current reviews for OSX 10.9.x, and ...
3. Downloaded and installed the current operating system (about a 3-hours process for me). OSX 10.9.2, here we are!
4. Then I returned to the Apple Store, found, and purchased Aperture 3. [For safety's sake, it would sure be nice to have a .dmg file I could copy and file away. I lost a perfectly legal and good copy of Adobe's Photoshop Elements 3 years ago because I wasn't smart enough to make a safety copy, and when my iMac crashed (fried electronic components), I was left with a copy of the software that wouldn't run, and couldn't be verified as legit.]
5. When Aperture 3 finished installing, I found and imported my COMPLETED Aperture 2 book project, which import seemed to proceed nominally -- the right number of pages, the right content on those pages, that sort of thing -- until I started looking more carefully at the pictures themselves. All of them, about 300 of them, have been imported into an Aperture 3 book project in such a reduced resolution that they are fuzzy at the size the book will be printed. Screen-capture of just one example (at 100% viewer setting):
I don't know what to do at this point to correct the problem, short of going through the entire book project, copy the custom captions (since those go away when you "delete" photo content), delete the photo, re-insert the photo, and paste back the custom caption. Lather, rinse, repeat - ~300 times! An estimated 2-3 hours of additional work.
Or does anyone in this community know either (1) that I did something wrong in the Aperture 2-to-Aperture 3 import (I don't recall being offered any options or choices in the process); or (2) that there is a wholesale one-step solution to my problem?
BTW, I tried to edit my "Product" info, but OSX 10.9.x is not in the pick list. I am running OSX 10.9.2
<Re-Titled By Host>

Frank, thanks for your note. I wrote "COMPLETED" because I had gone to a lot of effort to get the content of the book precisely as I wanted it. I would fully expect to see my level of effort and care matched by functional competence in Aperture 3 to render the book the way I created it. Too much to ask?
And yes, I upgraded the Aperture 2 Library first. [Not ALL my tens of 000s of pix, because I use Lightroom selectively for photo editing. But Yes to the Aperture 2 Library.] That step took a number of minutes, but seemed to work fine (no error messages of any kind).
Then I opened the existing book project in Aperture 3, which followed some "magic-box" process that took a minute or so. As I said, when that step was done, by all appearances the book was ready to submit for printing - until I examined the photos a little more closely. You did see the blurry example I included, didn't you? That is what each and every photo looks like.
Text-box content appears to have been rendered pertectly, for the record (including captions).
So, ... is this result something you have heard of before? Do you know of a one-step solution? Or am I looking at an extended picture-by-picture fix?

Satellite P200-17C: graphics in XP seems to be running a bit sluggish

Hi all
I've just bought a Satellite P200-17c.
I've set up my dual boot with Vista and XP (that was REALLLLY hard) everything seems to be almost OK, but..... The graphics in XP seems to be running a bit sluggish, when you scroll a window in a browser it seems to 'refresh' in blocks - it's not moving right. If I go to device manager under other devices there are two things for which there is no driver install, one says: VGA controller, the other says: unknown device!
It's true that I haven't istalled the ATI drivers yet.... But that's because the only place I can find to get them for XP is from the Toshiba support area, the file is 162MB (not that big) but it is downloading at such a slow pace even though I have a fast connection, I don't even know if it will work?!
I've tried some things from the ATI site directly, althought I was trying to install the drivers for the ATI HD2400 graphics card that the machine has, on installation it said it couldn't continue as there wasn't any compatable hardware connected.....
My download from the Toshiba area has already gone wrong once, meaning I have to re-start it.
Does any one have any light they can shine on this issue. If any one has the driver downloaded already and fancies sticking on mega upload or something, that'll be fun???!!!!!
Ideas suggestion welcome!

Hi
I was very curious about driver offered on Toshiba support page. You are right about file. It is about 160 MB and I have needed 20 minutes for download but download was successfully and I do not see any problem that you can not do the same.
Extract the file and just use setup.exe to start driver installation.

Problem with HP 3600n Color Laserjet Printer and new HP Notebook Running 64 bit Win7

I have a new HP notebook (dv7t-6100) with Core-i7 Processor, running 64 bit Windows 7 with all of the latest updates.
I also have a 27" iMac with Core-i7 Processor running 64 bit Windows 7 underneath Parallels 7. Parallels is a program that creates a virtual machine underneath Mac OSX.
Both versions of 64 bit Windows 7 work perfectly . . . EXCEPT, neither will print from my HP 3600n Color Laserjet. The iMac will print to the 3600n in OSX mode, and an earlier version of 32 bit Windows 7 under Parallels printed perfectly with this 3600n printer.
These facts prove that the printer is OK, the connection is OK. However, the 64 bit Windows 7 systems do not print.
In both of the 64 bit Windows 7 installs I allowed Windows to find and download the HP driver for this printer. Install of the driver was apparently successful. Still no printing.
One strange fact: Sometimes when I turn the computer off, the 3600n printer will print the items that had been in the queue before powering down. That is the only time it has printed anything . . . except under OSX on the iMac.
Does anyone know if there is a basic problem with 64 bit Windows 7 and this printer ?
Thanks for any help you can provide.

I just had the same problem with my MacBook Pro using 10.5.5 After trying a number of things, the following worked. (not sure what specifically ... just did this combination)
1. Had the Apple store Genius Bar folks install the latest HP drivers.
2. Restart computer
3. Restart the HP Color LaserJet 3600
4. Connected the HP printer and MacBook Pro directly into a switch, so the wireless was not an issue (both machines had IP addresses set and computer's was set to DHCP with manual IP).
5. Instead of using the System Preference printing and fax tool, I started Text Edit, typed something and said "print".
Print window came up and said "no printer selected"
6. I clicked on the drop down so it would look for printers.
7. It found the HP Color LaserJet 3600.
8. I clicked on the name of the printer and the computer went out and found the driver
9. I clicked on "Add" and it added the printer.
10. I tried a couple of test prints in different programs.
11. I disconnected the hard wired ethernet cables and set the computer to be on the wireless.
12. I printed a few more test prints in various programs.
I had previously tried selecting the printer and drivers through the System Preferences to no avail, but doing it this way worked.
Blessings

Running 64 Bit and 32 bit CS5 simultaneously?

I am delighted with my preliminary tests on CS5. However, one problem is that all my plugins (and Photoshop's own Lighting Effects) have disappeared. The solution is of course to run in 32 bit. To have close to close PS, go into Info to change its startup setting and then restart, and then repeat the whole process over again when I am finished with my plugin, is very tedious. So to make this easier I duplicated just the PS App file inside the CS5 directory and set the copy to run in 32 bit. So it is quick and easy to start whichever 64 or 32 bit PS I want without having to open Info and change the startup setting each time.
I have discovered, somewhat to my surprise, that I can run the two at the same time, apparently without conflict. This means I can simply open 32 bit when needed for a plugin and move the layer I am filtering back and forth via the clipboard. It's not ideal but it will do for now.
So two questions:
1) When I open the 32 bit version (the copy I made from the original installed app) I get a message "The application has been moved, and its path has changed. To update the product configuration, click Update." If I accept this and click update then the next time I try to run the original version I get the same message and have to update again to restore it. However if I just ignore the message each time the 32 bit version opens and don't update it seems to run fine with all my preferences and settings intact. Can anyone tell me what the implications of this message are and whether I can safely ignore it?
2) Am I courting disaster anyway running 64 and 32 bit side by side like this?
Thanks in advance for your help.
David Mac

David,
Essentially there is only one application and when you create multiple copies still then it point to one single binary , the location of which gets stored in a particular file.
Now when you launch the other Copy then the new location gets updated in that file. And again when you open original then also the location gets updated.
So it is advisable not to do so , but if you face any issues just remove the other copy and update the location with just one app.

I have mac OS X, Photoshop CC 64 bit and and i would like to run 32 bit plugins.. How may I do this ?

I have mac OS X, Photoshop CC 64 bit and and i would like to run 32 bit plugins.. How may I do this ?

As said already by JJMack, you cannot do that.
Photoshop CS6, CC & CC 2014 only install a 64-bit version on Mac OS.
Photoshop CS5 installs a version that can launch in either 32 bit or 64 bit when you install on a 64-bit version of Mac OS (Mac OS X 10.5 or later). If you are using Mac OS X 10.4 or earlier, then Photoshop only installs the 32-bit version.
Photoshop CS4 installs a 32-bit version only.
64-bit OS benefits, limitations
~ Arpit

Can I run 32 bit firefox on my Windows 7, 64 bit and how ? Flash player loads slow.

Can I run 32 bit Firefox on my Windows 7, 64 bit and how do I do that? Flash player loads videos slowly. You tube videos are mostly loading slowly or hanging up. It seems to have happened after the last Firefox update.

Dibbens wrote:
According to website I have Flash Player installed but I cannot run a program (BBC iPlayer DeskTop) that requires 64 Bit Flash player Any ideas?
Does that program require the Flash Player ActiveX Control, or the plugin? If you only have the ActiveX Control (for Internet Explorer) installed, then you may also need the plugin (for other browsers). Get it from http://get.adobe.com/flashplayer/otherversions/

VXIMove returns error 0x8000 only in 64-bit Solaris 8

We are looking to migrate our Solaris CPU to a faster Blade 150 (or better) PCI-based workstation. The downside is that these latest workstations all contain 64-bit processors so we are forced to run a 64-bit Solaris kernel. According to the NI-VXI documentation, the driver works on 32-bit and 64-bit kernels so I was not too concerned. Unfortunately our applications are not working properly when using the VXImove API call to move a chunk of data from VXI to a local memory address. The error is always 0x8000.
We eliminated Solaris 8 as the problem by duplicating the setup on an Ultra 10 workstation which is also PCI-based but runs 32-bit Solaris 8. The same drivers were used in both cases. The VXImove works properly when running in Solaris 8 32-bit.
I have attached my resman output files for reference. Thanks in advance.
Attachments:
resman.err.txt ‏1 KB
resman.out.txt ‏6 KB
resman.tbl.txt ‏1 KB

Hello All,
I would like to clarify one of the statements made earlier in this forum. NI VXI is not supported as a 64-bit application, under any circumstances. One can user NI VXI on a 64-bit system, but they must run it as a 32-bit application in order for it to function correctly, and therefore lose the 64-bit processing capability.
It is true that NI-VISA is simply an added layer between the driver and your application. As KnowledgeBase 2QDASEPG: Supported NI-VISA Operating Systems and Features points out, NI-VISA only supports VXI functionality on 32-bit operating systems. This is because the NI VXI driver itself is only supported as a 32-bit application.
Chris_G
Sr Test Engineer
Medtronic, Inc.

Outlook 2010 rules only run manually

Hello All,
I have a user whose Outlook 2010 rules only run manually. He has some server rules and he has some that say client only next to them. All of the client side rules are listed under the server rules. I have deleted all of his rules and had him recreate them
and i've ran outlook /cleanrules and they still do not work. I'm not sure what to try next. We are running Exchange 2010 Standard and Outlook 2010. Any ideas?
Thanks,
Alex

I had this same problem, tried many things that said it would work and didn't. Here's how I fixed it:
There are several good programs that backup Outlook. Backup FIRST.... I use Outback Plus 9 (http://ajsystems.com/outbackplus/obp.html) and there's also BackupOutlook (http://www.backupoutlook.com/)
Backup Outlook using Outback 9 Plus then:
1 - Go to the Control Panel
2 - In the Search box - enter:
Mail
3 - Run the Mail
- or - Mail (32 bit) applet
4 - Click:
Show Profiles
5 - Select the profile (you likely have only one)
6 - Click:
Remove    [this will remove the registry settings for this profile]
7 - Close the Control Panel
8 - Run Windows Explorer
9 - Go to the:
[My Documents]\Outlook Files folder
10 - Delete the \Outlook Files folder (or delete all of the items in it)
11 - Go to the folder
c:\users\--your user name--\appdata\local\Microsoft\outlook
12 - Delete all of the files in this folder
13 - Go to the folder:
c:\users\--your user name--\appdata\roaming\Microsoft\outlook
14 - Delete all of the files in this folder
This gets rid of the Outlook data and the profile setting.
I would restore the Outlook data (using OutBack Plus 9 - and assuming you have at least one POP3 type account) as follows:
1 - Run OBP9 and click Restore
2 - Locate the backup file to restore from
-- Open it
3 - When you get the message indicating that a full profile restore will not be done - acknowledge it.
OBP9 should then be planning to do a "Default" restore (i.e. it will restore the data to the default locations).
4 - Select the Outlook data files for the restore ... but do NOT restore any ".ost" type files (Outlook will rebuild these automatically).
5 - Finish the restore -- this will restore the Outlook data files to the proper default locations (e.g.
[My Documents]\Outlook Files for normal ".PST" files)
6 - Start Outlook [which will begin with a request to create a new Profile (Outlook) then email account]
7 - Refer to the web page:
http://ajsystems.com/kb3/outlook2010emailaccounts.htm
and begin at step "B" ... by electing to do a manual configuration of the account.
8 - Link the account to the (appropriate) Personal Folder file [PST file] restored to [My Documents]\Outlook Files
9 - Add any other POP3 type accounts using the same procedure .. linking them to the appropriate PST file.
Note - you can have multiple POP3 account linked to the same Personal Folder file (as was always the case prior to Outlook 2010.
10 - Add any other accounts (e.g. IMAP based accounts) which will automatically create the appropriate file and re-synch with the server.
11 - Re-run OBP9
12 - Locate the backup file to restore from
-- Open it
13 - Select Outlook Profile settings and ancillary settings (e.g. Signatures) ... but do NOT select any PST or OST files.
14 - Finish the restore to restore these settings to the new profile (created by step 6).
This was done with Outlook 2013 as well and on Windows 7 and Windows 8.1. All worked!

HP 4510S laptop. has dual core processor but is only running one half of it.

This system is running on Win 7 32bit. If I upgraded to W7-64 bit would the system then use both halves of the processor?

I use BELARC advisor which lists all hardware, SW on my system. It also tells me what processors I have, memory, etc. It will also tell me if I have a dual or single core processor and whether it is running both cores or only one. My gateway NV50 is running Win 7-64 bit and BELARC tells me how it is working on both cores. But my wifes LT which is an HP has win 7-32 bit for an OS and Belarc advises that it is only running one core. That is why I asked the question. I am upgrading the HD from 250 to 750 gb and maxing out her memory. Maybe then she will quit complaining about how slow it works.

Non-unicode can only have 32-bit kernel?

In a non-unicode system (NW04s), run disp+work -version,
it does tell it is 64 or 32.
I remember I saw somewhere that non-unicode goes
only with 32-bit.
Who can clarify? I'll thank you with points.

Hi Greg,
SAP supports non-unicode and unicode installations of SAP NetWeaver 2004s and prior release based systems (32 bit and 64 bit). Obviously 64bit has some advantages with memory handling and therefore can benefit unicode installations too.
For the latest information of when SAP will only ship unicode installation kits, please see this blog: /people/michael.eacrett/blog/2006/05/03/single-code-page-sap-systems-heading-towards-history--unicode-only-future
With regard to 32bit and 64bit, SAP is phasing out 32bit support and will only ship 64bit in the future. You can get more information in this blog:
/people/matt.kangas/blog/2006/05/03/will-you-still-love-me-when-im-64
I hope this helps you answer your question,
Mike.

Aperture 3 only runs 32 bit.....hov to get 64 bit ?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for