Aperture eats my Raw files

I brought Aperture from the get go, loved the program but couldn't handle the filing system, how happy I was to get 1.5. Been away for a month shooting in Namibia, got everything sorted with keywords etc. Aperture has now started to eat my raw files, lost 500 before I quit the program and called Apple. I'm not the only one to have the problem, and I'm sure not to be the only one who can't go back to take the pix again.

I lost one (all that I know of so far). However, Aperture had dropped it from its index system, but it was in the library.
When I noticed the gap in the file number sequence, I tried rebuilding (2x but to no avail). So, I looked in the "show package contents" for the library and the prject. There was a folder for my image file number and inside was my image.
Since Aperture couldn't rebuild it, I dragged it out to the desktop, started up Aperture and re-imported it.
A hassle and a concern, so I reported it to Aperture Devt Feedback.
You may want to look inside the library as above if your using managed vs. reference masters (as I assume from your post).
499, 498, 497, 496 .... 283, 282 .... 53, 52 .... 3, 2, 1 Martini time!
Have fun.
G.

Similar Messages

  • Does anyone know when Aperture will support RAW files from the Canon Eos 7D mkii?

    Does anyone know when Aperture will support RAW files from the Canon Eos 7D mkii?

    Only Apple knows. The never announce upcoming RAW support in advance, sorry. And if anybody knew, it would not be allowed to post this information here.

  • Why won't Aperture 2 support RAW files imported from Canon 60D when it does from my Olympus DSLR?

    Why won't Aperture 2 support RAW files imported from Canon 60D when it does from my Olympus DSLR?

    I'm afriad the fact that your Olympus dSLR is supported is no relevance.
    The Raw from every model of camera is different. Note: that's every model not every brand. So, the NEF produced by a Nikon D40 is not the same as the NEF produced by a D60, the CR2 produced by a Canon 350 is not the same as the CR2 produced by a Canon 400.
    Support for individual camera models has to be added one by one, and Apple will update the OS to work with the most recent version of the software. That's an incentive for you to keep up-to-date. So, for support for your 60D you'll need 10.6.5 plus Aperture 3 and/or iPhoto 11.
    Regards
    TD

  • Where is Aperture support for raw files from Leica X Vario?

    Where is Aperture support for raw files from Leica X Vario?

    It doesn't appear to exist, at this time:
    http://www.apple.com/aperture/specs/raw.html

  • Why does aperture convert my raw files to jpegs when I import them from iPhoto?

    Why does aperture convert my raw files to jpegs when I import them from iPhoto?

    It doesn't.
    When you import  Raw to iPhoto the app makes a jpeg preview of the Raw automatically. When you import from iPhoto then Aperture brings over both versions.
    Regards
    TD

  • Why does Aperture duplicate my raw files?

    I downloaded the Aperture demo a week and a half ago and started working on some photos which were on my hard drive. There was an enclosing folder with the name NAfricaSahara, and then within that folder 22 folders organized by date. There were about 3200 photos altogether.
    Now after working with about half of the raw files in Aperture, I have found that most of the raw files have been duplicated so that they are now loose in the NAfricaSahara folder as well as within the 22 date folders. This includes files I have worked on as well as files I have not worked on. Is this normal behavior for Aperture? I put one of the duplicate files in the trash (the original still was within its original date folder) and it disappeared from the Aperture window.
    How do I prevent this from happening? The duplicates are really eating up a lot of my disk space.

    No, I haven't copied versions. What I did was import the NAfricaSahara folder into Aperture. It contained subfolders by date of download to my Epson 4000 digital wallet. The subfolders also came into Aperture as Albums.
    I then moved some of the photos by selecting them and creating new albums (in cases where I had downloaded to the Epson less than daily) so that there was a album for each day.
    What I see in the Finder now are all the original folders I set up along with their contents. But all the individual files are now ALSO in the NAfrica Sahara folder (not in any subfolder), as well as in their original sub-folders.
    I don't want all these duplicates, but when I try to trash one, it disappears from Aperture.

  • How can I attribute my edits before aperture to the raw files as versions?

    Hi,
    I am in the middle of importing all my files (approx 100,000) into aperture. I have previously made edits of my best images and in some cases have several edits for one 'master' file. How can I attribute or link the edits to the master files? I have followed a simple nomenclature, where the camera raw file was say bfes1001.tif, I would name the files bfes1001e1.psd or bfes10001e1-small.jpg, bfes1001e1-epson7600.psd. So my question is really two parts, first is there a way to link my old edits to the master raw files, and secondly is there a way to import photoshop files without flattening them? I can't image throwing away all that time making masks etc. If there is no way to import a layered photoshop file then is there a way to make an association to the files if I leave them outside of Aperture (althought that seems to defeat a big part of Aperture)?
    Thanks,
    Eric

    This is not a method suited to automation, but what you can do is:
    1) Import original RAW into Aperture.
    2) Edit in external editor - it creates a new version based on PSD or TIFF (you choose in options).
    3) Kill external editor, replace created TIFF file with your new "master" tiff (or PSD). To do this just open the Aperture Library package using "Show Package Contents" in finder, do the same for the Project package held within the library, and finding the new TIFF version of your file. You could either replace the TIFF file before you return to Aperture form the editor or replace all the TIFF files with Aperture closed. The name must be identical. If you have a TIFF or PSD not in RGB mode Aperture will not like you much and probably crash whenever you go to view the picture.
    That seems the most space-efficient way to me and keeps Aperture understanding that your edited TIFFS are versions of a particular master.

  • Aperture 3: Deleting raw files and making the jpeg my new master-

    Aperture 3 has made some great strides in making the following possible ( I posted this originally in 2007):
    What I'd like to do is shoot everything in raw + jpg, and then keep the raw files only for the important shots.
    I really like having the option of raw processing, but the storage demands are very heavy. If I could just make a selection of photos in a roll, and have a command to delete any unneeded raw files from the selected photos, while keeping the original jpgs as master, that would be great.
    Also, it would be great to be able to manipulate a raw file, and then when I'm satisfied with the image, to render a high-quality jpg from that raw file & make the jpg the new master, and then delete the raw file to free up disk space.
    Basically, I want the raw file safety net for everyday images, without gobbling up gigabytes of disk space <<<<<
    With Aperture 3, I can finally change the master to the jpg file, which solves part of the problem. But I still want to be able to manipulate my raw file, and render a new high-quality jpg master.
    Why don't Aperture / Lightroom do this? To me at least, it seems an obvious feature.

    I had a chance to talk to product managers from both Apple & Adobe about this at PhotoPlus Expo in NYC a couple years back. Both seemed receptive, but here we are - years later - no progress.
    I think part of the problem is that there's a purist mentality about RAW files. One should always shoot them - and then keep them forever- after all- they're your negatives!
    But what about event photography? Or weddings, as you pointed out? It makes no sense to burden your workflow & backup system with 4GB of RAW files of people grinning into the camera. Once the adjustments have been made, the RAW files are just a ball & chain on your data management. And let's not forget, once you really know what you're doing, your jpegs should be good most of the time anyway.
    I want RAW files as a safety net for errors in exposure and white balance. Once I know I have good photos, I don't need the safety net anymore- at least not at the price of all that hard disk space and transfer time for online backup. Of course, for my fine art stuff and important documentary work, I'll always keep the RAWs permanently. But not for routine parties/events.
    You put your finger on the problem with re-importing jpegs as a solution. You lose your metadata- rankings/album memberships, etc. This is no solution!
    What I want is simple, and it would be immediately useful to countless photographers:
    1) Let me batch-delete RAW files when the jpegs are ok.
    2) Let me do adjustments on my RAW file, render out a high-quality jpeg, and make the jpeg my new master.
    Whoever does this first - Aperture or Lightroom - that's the product I'll use.

  • Aperture imports, and RAW files...

    After I import raw photos into Aperture when I first click on the photo and it opens in full screen, it looks brighter/best and then a second later the photo darkens colors change just a little, almost like I have an import preset assigned and it only happens when I import raw photos not JPEG's. Can someone tell me how I can make sure that I don't have some kind of preset happening, I would like to have the photo's stay the same as when i first import?

    You don;t have a preset set. What you are seeing is normal behavior when importing Raw files.
    What you see at first is the camera produced JPG preview imbedded in the Raw file. Aperture puts this up while it decodes the actual Raw data. This JPG has all the special settings and enhancements set on the camera and is basically the image that would be produced if you were shooting JPG.
    As a rule none of the settings on the camera (apart from the basics) are applied to the Raw file though some of the newer cameras have settings that could affect the data stored in the Raw file.
    This is a often asked question by those just getting into Raw and you can search the discussions here for other answers to this question.
    Given the capability of today's cameras, especially the high-end ones, a lot of users have decided to abandon Raw as unnecessary  if they are happy with the images the camera produces. It's all a matter of personal needs.
    regards

  • Most recent RAW update, New Aperture and Maverick but still Aperture cannot view RAW files from my Sony RX-100 camera.

    I have all the most recent Software updates and a brand new version of Aperture but when I connect my Sony RX-100 to my MBP, Aperture cannot view or import the RAW files. It will import JPEG format. I am new to Aperture and would appreciate some advice here. Do I need an old RAW format update or is there something else I need to do here.
    Thanks for any help.

    Keith, the latest raw support claims to have fixed issues with the RX-100 raw support:
    Digital Camera RAW Compatibility Update 5.03This update adds RAW image compatibility for additional cameras to Aperture 3 and iPhoto '11. Jan 16, 2014
    This update adds RAW image compatibility for the following camera to Aperture 3 and iPhoto '11:
    Canon EOS M2
    It also includes fixes that:
    Resolve an issue that prevented lens correction from working properly with Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 images
    Address a color cast issue on some Olympus OM-D E-M1 images
    The RX-100 has been supported since earlier, but the previous raw support has introduced a bug.
    itunesisbullshitplopcrapshould update the raw support. 
    This requires Aperture 3.5. and Mavericks.
    Correction: This requires
    System Requirements
    OS X 10.8.5 w/ iPhoto 9.4.3 or Aperture 9.4.5
    OS X 10.9 w/ iPhoto 9.4.3 or Aperture 9.4.5

  • Aperture wont open raw files from my panasonic fz18

    Hi Everyone, I have been using aperture 3 for about a year and have no problems opening raw files from my nikon camera but I thought I would use my old panasonic FZ18 when I go kayaking just in case the camera gets wet. To my surprise when I downloaded my raw files into Aperture from my FZ18 they would not open. Is there a codec or program update that will enable Aperture to open my raw files.
    Thanks Colin

    The FZ18, FZ35 and later are not supported by Apple RAW processing mostly due to the exotic barrel distortion correction that needs to be applied for wide angle shots.  Even Adobe DNG converter will not convert the .RW2 files to DNG unless you use dngsanitize to remove the lens correction metadata.  You can then bring the DNG files into Aperture.
    -Steve

  • Why doesn't Aperture 3 recognise RAW files from my Fuji F550EXR?

    I have just bought a Fujifilm F550EXR, partly because of it's RAW capabilities. I am an existing Aperture 3 user (Canon 5D Mk II) and have found it very good at working with the RAW files from that SLR. After shooting some test shots with the F550EXR, I now find that Aperture 3 doesn't recognise them. Surely Fuji's RAW file format has been around long enough for Apple to incorporate it into it's RAW converter. Why doesn't Apple support Fuji RAW files?

    Hi all,
    the problem still exists..
    Aperture still does not support this RAF (I recently bought a Fujifilm F550EXR)
    Others do..
    I've just tested Adobe Lightroom, works great
      with both, Fuji-RAF and NEF format (of my Nikon D80)
    even free picture software does support this Fuji-RAW format
    - e.g. "rawker", http://raifra.fh-friedberg.de/Mac/index-en.html
    so its hard for me to understand, that the missing cooperation between Fujifilm and Apple is the problem.
    I think, Apple regards it as too much effort to implement this format for (in relation) so few cameras..
    Aperture 2 had no backup function for some month, and Apple did not care ..
    (too much effort, too?)

  • Why does Aperture make D7000 RAW files Dark????????

    Okay, i've been through a million different ways - files look GREAT, then you load them into Aperture and they look like sh*t.
    And i finally figured out a way to PROVE that Aperture is screwing up my files! Here's what I did:
    Transfered original RAW files from my Nikon D7000 to a folder on a hard drive.
    1. Photo Mechanic: Loaded a RAW file into photo mechanic, it looked nice - exactly like it looked on my camera screen, did absolute nothing to it, exported it as a JPG. It came out looking NICE! Nice soft colors, lots of subtleties, beautiful. Could be a little sharper, but I wanted to make absolutely NO adjustments - since the test was for overall color and image quality.
    2. Aperture: Loaded the exact same original RAW file into Aperture and it looked like crap! DARK, muddy, all the subtletiy is lost. I did Nothing to adjust it, exported it as a high quality JPG - it came out DARK and muddy. Ugly!
    ***????? So annoying!!! This happens over and over and over again.
    It's YOU Aperture! Not me!! Not my files! Not my camera - which i've brought back to get checked countless times to see if something was wrong with the camera.
    It's really annoying. You have to fix it! There are countless comments online about this same problem. FIX IT!!!!!!!
    If you email me i'll attach the two sample files. I did NOTHING to adjust either of them in either program. This is just the crappy dark garbage that Aperture generates from perfectly beautiful RAW files from Nikon D7000 cameras.
    - please respond.

    What happens if, as an experiment, you use Adobe DNG Converter to convert one of the D7000's NEFs into a DNG? Same result?

  • Does Aperture support NEF RAW files for the Nikon D810?

    I am unable to open NEF RAW files for my new Nikon D810.  Are there any updates of suggestions.

    Apple has not yet reverse-engineered a RAW update for the d810. I would suggest that you shoot RAW +JPEG with all your NEF images on the CF card and put your JPEG optimal fine images on the SD card in slot 2. Save your NEF images and CF cards until the Aperture 3.5.1 RAW update for the d810 finally is available. In the meantime, you will have JPEG optimal images on your SD cards that you can import and process in Aperture. Good Luck.

  • Aperture and/or RAW files on a iPad?

    I use Aperture as my primary photo editng program, and do the editing on my MacPro.  While traveling, as a backup to my memory cards, I have been importing the RAW files from my Nikon DSLR into Aperture on my laptop (MacBook).  When I get home I then import again directly from the cards to my MacPro, using the files on the laptop only if the card is lost or corrupted.  QUESTION:  I am considering getting an iPad to replace the MacBook while traveling. Is it possible to import my Nikon RAW files onto the iPad, using any program/app that will store them as a backup to my cards?  I would not do editing on the iPad.  I do not believe that there is an Aperture app/program that will run on the iPad (could be wrong), but that would not be necessary for my purposes.  I only want a place to store the RAW files and then be able to retrieve them in an emergency in an unaltered form.  Thanks for any suggestions.

    You sure can, and it's actually pretty easy.
    First, you'll need the Camera Connection Kit for your iPad so you can either connect your camera via it's USB cable, or read an SD card if that's what your camera uses.
    No software is necessary on the iPad...simply connect the camera or SD card using the CCK and the iPad will import the images into a new event.
    Then when you are ready to import the images on the iPad into Aperture, simple connect it via it's USB cable and do an import in Aperture. The iPad will show up in Aperture as a device, and you can import the images on the iPad using all your usual settings.
    One obvious consideration is to make sure you get an iPad with enough storage for the photos you anticipate storing on it. As you know, RAW files--depending on your camera model--can use up storage pretty quickly. Apple just announced a 128GB version of the iPad so you have plenty of options.
    The iPad is a great device for what you describe, i.e., using it as a travel device.  You can easily view your images, do slideshows, and do some basic editing using iPhoto and other apps. Just don't plan on doing a lot of heavy-duty editing with it.

Maybe you are looking for

  • My ipod is not playing the full music track.why

    on some music tracks they are not playing to the end .on the computer they play to the end and on my phone but not on ipod .why could this be .

  • Export to Microsoft Excel opens empty - IE11, Office 2010, Win 7

    Hi, I am using IE11, Office 2010 and Win7 64bit. When I open IE, navigate to a webpage and click "Export to Microsoft Excel" from the context menu of IE, Excel opens and the "New Web Query" dialog has an empty address (http:///). The content is "This

  • Caption in disjointed rollovers

    Using Dreamweaver CS3 (WinXP), is there a simple way to add captions to disjointed rollovers? My aim is to click on a thumbnail, and when the image is projected on the poster, I want a caption appearing underneath. Can you please help me with this Th

  • How to stop an event action when other event happen ?

    This is my first swing program I want to design an application with two buttons,"start" and "stop" Pressing "start" will start listing data Pressing "stop" will stop listing data immediate What should I do?? I try to use a flag like the following: ==

  • How to Administrate iCloud and Itunes

    While connecting my iphone in my new Mac Book Pro (i5, 4GB RAM 500 HD), I choosed backup using icloud, After that, some things were strange (At least by me): 1. Apps previously downloaded in my itunes account are not available in my mac Library, even