Aperture iPhoto Import

I imported my iPhoto library into a trial version of Aperture (Aperture will manage the directory). iPhoto manages the photos by putting them in by year in the "Masters" directory, then by event name. I noticed that the Aperture iPhoto import placed all my photos into 2011 directory instead of the same file structure in iPhoto. Is there a way to get Aperture to manage my imported photos and place the photos in a file stucture by year?
I do not intend to monkey around with the iphoto or aperture library's, but I do want the photos stored in a fasion that I could move on to some other program if needed in the future.
Thanks Gary

None taken, I am just one of those that want to know how Aperture is handling my photos. My search in the manual and in this forum did not help entirely, until now. You are right it does not matter how Aperture handles the bundle as long as you want to continue to use Aperture. I thought it was strange that iPhoto handles it one way and Aperture handles it another. I like the way iPhoto places my photos in by year. It appears that Aperture will also do this but only for my pictures this day forward. My concern is for the future, and for something that may never happen, but I plan for it anyway. If I decide to make another change in the future, I would want to make sure at least the pictures are structured by year. I should be able to go into the Aperture bundle and copy the masters out if needed. I was hoping I could get the imported photos structure by year. I do like Aperture so far and will more than likely make the purchase.
Gary

Similar Messages

Aperture/iPhoto Importer Not Working

I just downloaded the trial for Lightroom 5 and installed the Aperture/Iphone Importer plug in. I tried to use it to import my iPhoto library with almost 42,000 photos.
I already checked that the iPhoto Library is the correct one and that the destination in the "Copy images/videos to:" is set to Pictures/LightroomMasters folder
The problem is that the import button is always in gray, so I can't click it to start the import!
I am running Lightroom on a Macbook Pro with the latest OS X 10.10 (Yosemite) And Lightroom Version 5.6
Please help, I want to try Lightroom but has not started good.
Thank you.

Haven't tried it on an iPhoto library, but
Try:
-Restarting Lightroom
-Changing some of the options
-Changing the destination
-Make sure you have permissions on the destination

IPhoto to Aperture 3 import - not all photos get imported...

Hello - My library is not huge, only about 8000 photos. Just bought Aperture 3 and imported my iPhoto library into A3. Seemed to go without issues. Today, as I re-organize a few folders, projects, etc., I realize that not all the photos were imported. About 700, to be exact. Every named Event in iPhoto imported over into A3, but not all photos within each Event (now Project). Any thoughts on what could have happened and how this could be avoided?
I could import each Event individually, but then I would loose all my keywords. Any work around you can think of? Thanks!

Try rebuild your iPhoto Library:
Option 1
Back Up and try rebuild the library: hold down the command and option (or alt) keys while launching iPhoto. Use the resulting dialogue to rebuild. Choose to Rebuild iPhoto Library Database from automatic backup.
If that fails:
Option 2
Download iPhoto Library Manager and use its rebuild function. This will create a new library based on data in the albumdata.xml file. Not everything will be brought over - no slideshows, books or calendars, for instance - but it should get all your albums and keywords, faces and places back.
I would import each event individually, but I would like my keywords preserved
Using the iPhoto Media Browser (File -> Import -> Show iPhoto Browser) will get your keywords too.
Regards
TD
Because this process creates an entirely new library and leaves your old one untouched, it is non-destructive, and if you're not happy with the results you can simply return to your old one.

Aperture Library Menu after iPhoto import

When I purchased Aperture I imported by iPhoto library into it. This created a bewildering number of entries in the library listing seen on the left of the screen.
my Library listings on the left in windowed view. It is just clogged with entries created when I imported my iPhoto library... there are numbers, projects, dates, rolls and albums all one after anothe. You seem to only be able to choose "all items" "favorite items" or "recent items" and some additional arrangments. Is there a way to pare this down without damage? Here is a small section of what I see...

William,
what does your original iPhoto Library look like?
Your screenshot shows a list of projects. When you imported the iPhoto library, Aperture should have created one project for each of the events in the iPhoto Library. Does your iPhoto library have similar events?
If you see too many projects you can do two things to get them better organized:
Create folders (File > New > Folder) and drag related projects to the same folder. Then you can collapse the folders and hide the projects inside.
Merge related projects. If you select the "Projects" view (in the top section of the library inspector), you can merge projects by dragging a project on top of another project.
Do not delete projects, unless you want to delete the images in th projects. Projects are the containers of the images. Each image (and all its edited versions) resides in exactly one project, and deleting the project will delete the image and all its versions.
Regards
Léonie

Do Descriptions from iPhoto import to Aperture

Do descriptions from iPhoto import to Aperture, if so, is there a way to make the description or caption show up in an Aperture slideshow? Pre-Purchase question.
Thanks

I don't know. But with the recent upgrades to iPhoto and Aperture, the two programs share the Library file format (Libraries are no longer specific to one program or the other; any upgraded Library can be opened in either upgraded program), so the question becomes: where does the "description" in iPhoto show in Aperture, and can it be shown in a slide show?
IOW, importing has been removed from the problem.
Apple has listed a good bit of cross-progam information here. Don't know if iPhoto descriptions are covered, though.

Hidden photos in iPhoto not hidden in aperture after import

After importing all of my iPhotos into aperture, my hidden photos are being shown in aperture. Is there a way to have my photos hidden in aperture as well?

Not really.
Aperture has a seven-level rating scheme: no rating, 1-5, and "rejected".
I'm pretty sure (I don't know for certain) that photos hidden in iPhoto are assigned a rating of "rejected" when imported into Aperture via the iPhoto importer.
Rejected Images are not shown in the default Browser view of any container. The purpose, however, is less to hide Images than it is to remove them from view prior to deleting or relocating them.
If you have Images you wish to hide from view of someone who has access to your Aperture Library, you should not include them in that Library.

Aperture/iPhoto - Use Unified Library or import iPhoto into Aperture?

So as it is June 30th, I've been forced into upgrading to Lion. Now I know I can take advantage of the Aperture/iPhoto unified library structure.
But should I?
I am new to Aperture and use it for photos starting in January 2012 going forward. I have already upgraded to Aperture 3.3. I am still currently running iPhoto 8.1.2 for photos from 2011 and earlier. My plan was to eventually import my iPhoto library into Aperture. Now it appears I don't have to.
So I'm standing at a crossroads and I'd like feedback. I have read some of the discussions where folks are having issues with migration with both avenues so I'd like to know which one makes more sense.
Should I upgrade to iPhoto 9.3? Should I keep each library separate? Should I merge? Should I import iPhoto into Aperture still and have one library going forward?
Looking for folks with some experience to give me guidance!
Thanks in advance!
Chrystal in TX

Merge them. When you upgrade to iPhoto 9.3 and Aperture 3.3 the programs use the same library format... you can open it in either one.
Note people rarely post feedback about something if it's working for them, so results will always be skewed toward the negative online. Still, it makes sense to have a backup before upgrading, as a general best practice.

I just noticed that I can no longer select photos out of my finder that are located in my Aperture/Iphoto Library. I used to be able to attach photos to my gmail out of the aperture library in the finder and for some reason, no longer can.

I just noticed that I can no longer select photos out of my finder that are located in my Aperture/Iphoto Library. I used to be able to attach photos to my gmail out of the aperture library in the finder and for some reason, no longer can.
I can't access these images except to go into the applications.
Also, I'd like to import my iphoto library into aperture, and move aperture library to an external drive. I tried the import first, but there wasn't enough space. Then I tried copying over the aperture library onto the external drive but it failed bc it said file was in use.
As it is, I only have 50gb left on my imac, and the aperture library is 150gb. Also, I have over 10k images in both libraries combined and there are tons of duplicates that need to be sorted, and hopefully not messed up because I've organized most of them.
So in short, I need to know how to do the following:
-select photos in finder in aperture/iphoto libraries
-move aperture library to live on external drive
-import iphoto library into aperture library
-eliminate dups but maintain organization
-moving forward i need a better workflow so that I import images from camera, and can organize right away into albums rather than creating projects by default and then creating albums so essentially the photos are in 2 different places, even tho they are referenced
-live happily ever after
Thanks in advance for any support you can offer!!

If you're using apps like iPhoto or Aperture then they replace the Finder for managing your photos. The point is that you use the (many) options available via these apps for the things you want and need to do with the Photos.
So, simply, you don't select the photos in the Finder. I'll append the supported ways to do this - which are faster and will yield the current version of your Photos - to the end of this post.
-move aperture library to live on external drive
Managed or Referenced Library? Managed -
Make sure the drive is formatted Mac OS Extended (Journaled)
1. Quit Aperture
2. Copy the Library from your Pictures Folder to the External Disk.
3. Hold down the option (or alt) key while launching Aperture. From the resulting menu select 'Choose Library' and navigate to the new location. From that point on this will be the default location of your library.
4. Test the library and when you're sure all is well, trash the one on your internal HD to free up space.
Referenced - relocate your Masters first.
These issues are covered in the Manual and on this forum hundreds of times.
-import iphoto library into aperture library
FIle -> Import -> iPhoto Library? Have you done this already? If so are you trying to move the Masters to Aperture from an iPhoto Library? Or Consolidate them?
-moving forward i need a better workflow so that I import images from camera, and can organize right away into albums rather than creating projects by default and then creating albums so essentially the photos are in 2 different places, even tho they are referenced
You can't. Every photo is in a Project. They’re the basic building blocks of the Library.
You might want to spend a little time with the manual or the video tutorials. I'm not sure you've grasped the app you've purchased.
The following is written for iPhoto, but about 97% works for Aperture too.
There are many, many ways to access your files in iPhoto/ APerture: You can use any Open / Attach / Browse dialogue. On the left there's a Media heading, your pics can be accessed there. Command-Click for selecting multiple pics. This is what you use to attach your shot to your GMail
(Note the above illustration is not a Finder Window. It's the dialogue you get when you go File -> Open)
You can access the Library from the New Message Window in Mail:
There's a similar option in Outlook and many, many other apps. If you use Apple's Mail, Entourage, AOL or Eudora you can email from within iPhoto/ Aperture.
If you use a Cocoa-based Browser such as Safari, you can drag the pics from the iPhoto Window to the Attach window in the browser.
If you want to access the files with iPhoto/ Aperture not running:
For users of 10.6 and later: You can download a free Services component from MacOSXAutomation which will give you access to the Library from your Services Menu.
Using the Services Preference Pane you can even create a keyboard shortcut for it.
or use this free utility Karelia iMedia Browser

Aperture = iPhoto + Bridge Photo Downloader + Photoshop?

I am considering to use Aperture to streamline my workflow but I wonder about its file management capability. Let me explain the details:
I love iPhoto to browse, find and preview photos. It provides the most intuitive, easy and fast way for that. The interface is also nice. The photo-editing capability is negligible for me as I use Photoshop for this.
But I really hate the way it manages imported photos as Rolls and keep everything hidden under the 'Package'. So instead, I use Adobe's Bridge Photo Downloader from Photoshop to download photos from my cameras/iPhone and I set it to organize the files into folders: year/year-month/date-time of the photos taken. Then I'd import them to iPhoto - but without copying the originals. So basically I create a Reference Library for my iPhoto. I then tag/assigning Keywords the photos accordingly (I have plenty of keywords assigned). I sometimes create Events or Albums too - especially great for showing photos on my computer to friends and family.
Photoshop is set as the external app to edit photos so from iPhoto I can open the file in Photoshop (which I have been using for all my photo editing needs including RAW).
From what I gathered so far, Aperture seems to be a more efficient alternative to process RAW photos, and I've been wanting to find an alternative to the iPhoto-Bridge-Photoshop method above. Basically I need a Photo App that can do all the following:
1. Import original photos from cameras/iPhone and then automatically organize them chronologically (in folders of year/year-month/date-time of the photo taken) a la Bridge's Photo Downloader
2. Tag/Keywords, create Events and Albums, and to Preview photos quickly a la iPhoto
3. Edit RAW files without harming the original files a la Photoshop
I wonder whether Aperture is suitable for the usage I described above?
Thanks in advance for any inputs!

Hi freefire,
So Aperture can import photosfrom cameras/iPhone and automatically organize, rename and save them into folders outside of Aperture Library?
You can rename files on each import. However, saving files is not Aperture's job. If you put the files wherever you want, and then import them into Aperture as referenced images, they stay where they are.
Alternately, and this would be much more tedious, you could import them all into Aperture as managed photos, and then use Aperture to "relocate masters" to somewhere else. That's sort of like two steps where one (my first paragraph) would suffice.
If you want to organize photos by year, that is the job of Aperture. However, that is the job of Aperture *within the confines of Aperture*. Aperture is built primary to help you organize your photos within its database. You can make smart albums to show you every photo from 2010, for instance. That smart album is meaningless in Finder because it is not a primary function of Aperture to help you organize outside of Aperture. Basically, if you want to use Aperture to make directory structures for Finder, you aren't using Aperture in the most effective way.
When I edit a RAW file in Photoshop, Photoshop keeps the new setting within the RAW file itself without creating new file and I can go back and make further changes or revert back to original state - all in the file itself.
Are you sure about that? I thought Photoshop used the sidecar XMP files for that sort of thing. I'm no expert, but there's generally no provision in the file formats (including RAW files) for "this is how you undo something." I don't use Photoshop like that, but it sounds fishy that Photoshop will choose to write new data to a RAW file, as RAW files are proprietary and will never be produced by anything but a camera. It sounds doubly fishy that it will also write *undo data* to a RAW file. Again, I'm no expert at Photoshop, but I am an expert at software engineering, and it sounds pretty strange and error-prone.
http://forums.adobe.com/message/3359633
Now, when I do that with Aperture, will Aperture then make a new copy of the RAW file to be kept in Aperture Library?
Aperture will not make a new copy of a master (RAW or not) unless you explicitly duplicate it (and that is not what you are asking about). Aperture, being a Digital Asset Manager, will never modify your masters. (Except if you change the date/time and choose to modify the master.) This is unlike photo editors like Photoshop, which may manipulate their input files and save those changes to the same files. Aperture makes a version, which is a recipe for changing the appearance of your master.
nathan

Aperture Video Import Problem - from Lumix GH4: Imported clips have their dates changed to the import date. The files show up on the hard drive but many are not showing up in Aperture.

Aperture Video Import Problem - from Lumix GH4: Imported clips have their dates changed to the import date. The files show up on the hard drive with import date not created date, but many of these same files are not showing up in Aperture. Sometimes the clips actually show up with the current import but take on the video information from a previously imported file.

It was suggested I move this question to IPhoto or IMovie which I did.
Well moving to a different discussion group did not provide an answer to this question either. But what I finally did was import one batch of photos and videos into IPhoto for a given day at a time. Working with these I could change the date and times in order to get them in the original sequench taken. Then I would create an album with that batch. These would all be on the same day (IMove was closed for this phase). Then I would open IMovie, generate the thumbnails for that album, and select the album I had created. This was necessary because the importing process in IPhoto was using incorrect dates for my video so it was a real struggle finding them in IMove until I developed this approach.
I believe that this whole process was so screwy because I was importing from an external hard drive not a camera. I had these photos on a PC and did not have the original cameras to use to import directly which I am fairly sure would have made this easier!

Workflow: Camera - Aperture - iPhoto

Hi there, some questions regarding the workflow that I use. Like everything, it has its ups and its downs. What I´m trying to do - of course - is to eliminate the downs. Please feel free to comment.
1 - Shooting in RAW
I use a Nikon D200 for photography. I have this set to shoot in RAW. This gives me maximum quality and flexibility afterwards. Yes, the files are large, but with the prices of memory cards, this is no problem (for me). I have my camera set up in the AdobeRGB (1998) color space, although shooting in RAW does not assign a color profile to the files, as far as I know.
2 - Processing in Aperture
I import the files in Aperture. This Apple program gives me the possibility to totally work in RAW (I ahrdly ever use Photoshop any more). In the import step, an AdobeRGB (1998) color profile is assigned to the pictures. I have my monitor calibrated (Colorvision), so the camera and monitor profile work together to show me the exact image.
3 - Export from Aperture to network disk cabinet (NAS)
When I´m finished adjusting the pictures in Aperture, I use the export function to make JPG copies and store the JPG´s on a network attached storage (disk cabinet). I later use to JPG´s in iPhoto.
Question - What image resolution should I use to create the JPG´s. I have read all sorts of confusing stuff about pixels and DPI and how these things are not the same. What I want, is to have iPhoto display the pictures in a good quality, without taking too long to load them. Which resolution do you guys think I should use?
The original photo´s - still in RAW - are kept in Aperture. When I want to make prints, I do this from Aperture, using the RAW pictures. I later save the Aperture projects as containers to my NAS.
4 - Showing off in iPhoto
I import the JPG´s from my NAS. I do not copy the files to the library, but have iPhoto point to the NAS-based files.
Question - Do you people have all your pictures stored in the library? The library seems to get really really big...... but maybe there are some advantages that I do not see right now. A possible advantage would be, that by copying the picturews in the library, there is a possibility to link a color profile to them. Does anyone have a nice comparison of pro´s and cons of both possibilities?
I use iPhoto to show my stuff through Front Row. Of course, my NAS has to be running... Hmmmm maybe that would be another advantage of storing the pictures directly in the library...
I bought iLife 08 a few days ago and als got a .MAc account, so now I also have the possibility to create web galleries. Great stuff !!
Question - Am I correct that there is no possibility to decide on the resolution of the pictures on the gallery? So, which resolution are they?
Question - I assume that, when I create a gallery, the pictures are copied from my computer (iPhoto library) to a .Mac server so that everyone can see them without my computer having to be running?
These are my questions. So, what do you guys think? Again, please feel free to comment on anything I have written here. Thanks.
Kind regards,
Willem
(Netherlands)

Terence, thanks for your quick reaction. Let me try to clarify the situation.
In my workflow, I try to separate between processing and digital publishing.
*For processing*, I use Aperture. For this, I import pictures into a project in Aperture, and I do all sorts of actions on them until I'm satisfied with the results. In this proces, I work in RAW. I also show the pictures that I'm working on to the relevant people (clients, friends) in Aperture slideshows. While I work in Aperture, the pictures are stored inside the Aperture library which is on my local harddrive. I use a vault to make backups while I'm in the processing stage.
When I'm thru with processing. what I want to do is get (selected) pictures into iPhoto. I want these to be in a good quality, taking into account that most of the time, I will be showing them digitally thru Front Row, a iPhoto slideshow or in a web gallery. Of course, these pictures need not be in RAW quality. I think, a decent JPG quality will do just fine. Remember, if I want to make prints, I use Aperture since this has far better controls.
I use a NAS to store all my relevant stuff. I have several shares set up on the NAS, like "media", "backup" and home shares for different users (mostly private users but also my business user, I'm self-employed).
So, for example, when I listen to music thru iTunes, it actually points to music on the NAS. Therefor, my NAS has to be running. This is a downside of the NAS solution. Pro's of using a NAS are, for me:
- it is a RAID disk cabinet, so with extra security built-in;
- the local harddrive in my iMac would be too little to hold all my stuff (since I'm a music purist, I do not compress my music so the files are rather large....)
So, for *digital publishing* the pictures, I thought it would be wise to have the pictures on my NAS. In this way, they are on a safe RAID cabinet and also, it keeps the iPhoto library from getting too large.
When I have exported the JPG's out of Aperture and maybe have made prints, I save the Aperture project as a container on my NAS and then I delete the Apeerture project. After that, I use iPhoto to show the stuff.
So, I cannot point iPhoto to the Aperture, because that would mean that I would have to keep all pictures inside the Aperture.
Am I doing something stupid here?
Willem
Netherlands

Dark photos from Aperture, iPhoto or Drag and drop

All imported photos (from aperture, iphoto or drag&droped) whitin a project are very dark in the viewer, and in the final video (itunes, export with several options...). The histogram levels of the image are low. The preview image in the project looks fine.
I tried repair permissions with disk Utility, system clean with Onyx... the problem remains.
Thanks

I'm having the same problem, but only after I installed the iMovie 9.0.1 update. Before then my still images looked fine when imported.
But now, my pictures are coming up so dark as to be unusable. I was forced to export them as slideshow movies from iPhoto and import them as clips to iMovie last time I tried to use still images.

Aperture & iPhoto metadata when images NOT stored in iPhoto

Thinking of "upgrading" to Aperture from iPhoto '11 - still want to use iPhoto for organization but Aperture for hopefully better editing capabilities, etc.
Have 30,000+ images with keywords, etc. in iPhoto; the image files are NOT stored IN iPhoto, i.e., they are organized in folders external to iPhoto's library. The iPhoto library file best I can tell stores thumbnails and keyword metadata, etc.
I'd like to use Aperture and have access to all of iPhoto's keywords, etc. but to use the original photo files.
Can Aperture be setup to work this way? i.e., to pull in the 30,000+ photos' keywords yet reference the same originals that iPhoto is referencing?
I don't want to duplicate the 30,000+ originals... In all likelihood I'd only ever want to manipulate a small percentage of the total image library in Aperture.
Any suggestions appreciated!
Alex

Alexander Mcleod wrote:
Thank you for taking the time to reply...
re: "Basically to edit an image, stored in iPhoto, in Aperture you would have to export the image from iPhoto import into Aperture modify it export it out of Aperture and import it back into iPhoto."
My point is that in my case the images are NOT *stored* IN iPhoto...
Yes I understand, your iPhoto library is setup using referenced masters, the termed used when the master file is stored outside of the programs database. And you could setup Aperture in the same way and they would both be pointing to the same master file, external to both programs databases.
But here's here's the kicker: The master file *is never modified* by either program. I believe iPhoto makes a copy of the master when you apply adjustments (someone with a greater understanding of iPhoto can correct me here) how it does it isn't important what is important is that he master isn't modified; Aperture also leaves the master alone. It records the adjustments you make as a stream on instructions and applies those to the master when you want to create an adjusted image. What you see (normally) in Aperture's views are previews of the adjusted image. So changes you make in Aperture won't be seen in iPhoto because iPhoto is looking at the original master file, not Aperture's adjusted version.
Now you can share the preview from Aperture with iPhoto, but at this point you basically have the adjusted image in two places.
And in reference to the other response that suggests that iPhoto and Aperture use different databases, I'd completely expect that to be the case. What I'm wondering about is can Aperture initialize its database from iPhoto's database; i.e., create its equivalent to iPhoto's "library" file (where all the iPhoto metadata is stored) from iPhoto's AND like iPhoto reference the original files in their original location.
Yes Aperture can initialize a database of its own based on the iPhoto library and that library can be setup to use referenced masters, see above.
I don't see why I'd need to 'export' any image from iPhoto (unless of course I'd "edited" it in iPhoto - in which case the *modified* file IS I think stored IN iPhoto's library) but that's my point... I don't WANT to edit the files with iPhoto... I want to edit the files with Aperture.
You're right you won't need to export from iPhoto if you setup both with referenced masters. But like I said above to get back to iPhoto you will have to export from Aperture unless you can live with using the previews in iPhoto. But again you will basically have two identical library structures, at least at start, as time goes on they will diverge.
I hope this better clarifies what I'm trying to explain.
It does, I hope my reply also helps explain the difficulties with this setup and why it's not as cut and dry as it first appears.
I have read *many* other posts that point out what you're pointing out but they all seem to make assumptions about wanting to modify files in Aperture which were previously *modified* in iPhoto. The unmodified "original" photos (assuming both iPhoto and Aperture have the ability that iPhoto has to reference the original files from a location *external* to iPhoto) are then by definition are already shared between iPhoto and Aperture so there's no need to 'export' from one to the other, no?
As I've said whats shared is the original unmodified master image. Once either program modifies it it is no longer shared.

Album sharing gone in Aperture iPhoto

With the latest releases of Aperture and iPhoto, album sharing seems to be gone. I used to be able to go to Preferences in Aperture, share selected Albums and see them on other computers on the network in the Media brower or directly in iPhoto. Am I remembering wrong or has this feature gone away?
With Aperture 3.3 and iPhoto 9.2.3 libraries can be opened by either, but that's not convenient for merging photos from one computer to the other. Our situation is that both my wife and I take pictures, I use Aperture and she uses iPhoto. We both create Albums and sometimes we want the other person's photos.

I just ran into the same problem. I was going to switch to Aperture completely until iPhoto went from 5 to 6. It has a lot of the new features that Aperture has but there are still some awesome features in Aperture that I can't live without. One thing Aperture is missing is that it doesn't check for duplicates when importing pics. So what I decided to do is use iPhoto as my importer (whether from a camera or folder), and then use Aperture's import menu to import the rolls or pictures I want. If you haven't tried it out yet, do so. It is really awesome since it lets you select the rolls as they are saved in iPhoto and gives you a preview of each picture.

Aperture/iPhoto issue

some of my images in Aperture/iPhoto are appearing pixelated. any idea on how to get the issue fixed

Now my console is producing the following message when I try to import a iPhoto Library:
2/1/11 10:04:59 PM Aperture[4066] POST /WSComments.woa/xmlrpc (FAILED), httpStatusCode:500, errorType:100, transactionState:5, txnId:0DAEAB4A-6DB3-4870-BC3D-08F4A32CDCBD, auto-retries=0, manual-retries=0
2/1/11 10:05:04 PM Aperture[4066] Cannot load Interface Builder file 'NSAlertPanel'

Aperture iPhoto Import

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for