Aperture to [Original images | Lightroom]?

Just manged to delete the long version of this post so I'll keep it short:
- Aperture doesn't support my cameras RAW files.
- I have a copy of all my images in the filesystem external to Aperture's database. (my trust of db's not getting corrupt is low)
- All my metadata is stored in Apertures database.
I need to be able to get my metadata out of the database and back into the orginal files.
Is there a script that can do this based on image name? I.e., take the metadata from IMG_23456 in aperture and stick it into the file named IMG_23456? Or that can stick it into lightroom, again keyed by image name (since lightroom can use the original files this would work as well.)
Or, failing that, is it feasable to export each album from aperture to disc and have it keep all the meta data? I could then replace the originals with the exported versions. (Though doing that by hand for several hundred albums won't be fun, and I'll have to make sure not to accidently chuck any of my video clips since I don't (and can't) have those in aperture.)
Any other ways people can think of to get the metadata out of aperture?
Thanks for any help!
-eric

In the "folders" pane, right-click on the folder you see and select "show parent folder". Repeat as needed.

Similar Messages

  • Aperture Import: Original images saved outside library since upgrade

    Before I upgraded to Snow Leopard and Aperture 2.1.4 all my images were saved in the Aperture library. I upgraded to OS X 10.6 and to Aperture 2.1.4 at the same time.
    Aperture still saves the previews and the thumbnails in the library, but it saves the originals in the pictures folder, even if I add photos to projects that were created before the upgrade. In the Aperture preferences I can only find a setting for the location of the library, but not a setting to indicate that the originals should be stored somewhere else. Where can I find the setting to indicate where the original files should be stored?
    The files are stored using the pattern defined under presets / folder naming. If I can't resolve the issue of the files not being stored in the library, then I will probably set my folder naming preset to "Custom name (Aperture) / Folder name / Project name". Is there a way to update older projects to move the originals out of the library to this folder structure?
    Thanks,
    Jasper

    jazzvm wrote:
    Where can I find the setting to indicate where the original files should be stored?
    On the right-hand side of the import dialog, where it asks you where o store the images.
    Ian

  • When saving an image in PS CS 6, and going back to Lightroom 5. The original image and the edited image are at the end of the line up.

    I'm using a Mac, Lightroom 5 and Photoshop CS 6. I've started having an issue with the line up in Lightroom 5 after saving an image from PS CS 6. For some reason when I save the edited image form CS 6 it's taking the edited image and the original image and putting it at the end of the line up in Lightroom. If I take the edited image and move it to the right of the original it will put both of them back in the line up where they should be. How do I fix this. I've been looking in the menu for some kind of setting  with no luck.

    Change the sort order. View->Sort

  • Aperture is exporting large file size e.g. original image is 18.2MB and the exported version (TFF 16 Bit) is 47.9MB, any ideas please

    Aperture is exporting large file size e.g. original image is 18.2MB and the exported version (TFF 16 Bit) is 47.9MB, any ideas please

    Raws, even if not compressed, Sould be smaller than a 24-bit Tiff, since they have only one bitplane. My T3i shoots 14 bit 18MP raws and has a raw file size of 24.5 MB*. An uncompressed Tiff should have a size of 18 MP x 3 bytes per pixel or 54 MB.
    *There must be some lossless compression going on since 18 MP times 1.75 bytes per pixel is 31.5MB for uncompressed raw.

  • Raw images from 1GX are rendering soft in Aperture - crystal clear on Lightroom

    I have just upgraded to a Canon 1Gx MK II as my point & shoot.  RAW images are rendering terribly soft in Aperture - crystal clear in Lightroom.  Any ideas?

    Have you in-camera settings applied, when you take your RAW photos? Aperture will ignore any of the in-camera settings when developing the RAW.
    Have a look at Keith Barkley's User Tip. See this link:
    The Big Three: Setting your camera for the best Aperture RAW results
    Also, you may want to check the RAW Fine Tuning settings in the Adjustments panel. Perhaps these setting have been changed from the default values.

  • I seem to have lost my original images and unwanted images have moved into my library. I couldn't access lightroom 3 as usual and was provided a default option which I clicked. I ely heavily on lightroom and have spent countless hours fixing images, ple.

    Hi, I seem to have lost my original images and unwanted images have moved into my library. I couldn't access lightroom as I would normally and was provided with a default option which I clicked. This all occured while I was trying to free up space on my computer while viewing saved images on my hard drive, which are linked up directly to a photoshop elements program. Please tell me this can be fixed.....

    Hi there,
    I don't believe I did move or delete my catalogue. Where can I look for my catalog file. Why does my Lightroon now contain more images and ones I don't want on it, without my physically importing them?
    Thanks
    Pablo

  • Raw Files Appear Deleted or Corrupted Suddenly in Aperture with Unsupported Image Format Error

    I have been using Aperture 3, latest update, for the past year. Today, I tried to import new raw files from my new Sony RX1r and, as far as I can see, all raw files in Aperture give the "Unsupported Image Format" and alert symbol in the library where not only new files should be, but also ALL PREVIOUS RAW FILES. These files do no even show up as existing in the iPhoto Library.
    This is, needless to say, distressing, as hundreds and hundreds of photos seem lost. Also, the files show a reduced pixel size and file sizes all go to .5 Mb. Some of the photos seemed to show up initially and look fine until I tried to open them, then they all either disappear or show the Unsupported Image Format instead of the opened file. I have tried rebuilding the iPhoto library, but no help.
    I have looked in these discussions and see similar problems with Aperture. Perhaps, Apple has not made an update for the RX1r from the RX1 for raw files, but why should all older raw files now be corrupted, especially those recently made with my Olympus OM-D? Had no problem with Aperture until this disaster.
    Please help.
    William

    Just an update. Restarted computer and attempted rebuilds of iPhoto library a couple more times and finally files and photos mostly recovered, except for those I had tried to open. Aperture seems to have a problem, or a host of them, dealing with RAW files, and there is no update yet for the Sony RX1R for Aperture or iPhoto. Lightroom 5, on the other hand, seems to work great with these files directly, so that will be where all photos go for now. Will iPhoto and Aperture just become old archives? It is so infuriating that Apple does not allow for simple importing and exporting compatibility with such an excellent program as Lightroom 5 just to protect their somewhat poorly supported Aperture. I've been a staunch Apple supporter and user since the 80's, but having more doubts about the direction this company is taking.

  • How to make Photoshop save Aperture imported JPEG images as JPEGs

    Recently, I upgraded from Photoshop CS 5 to CS 5.1.
    My point and shoot cameras record in JPEG format. Often, I'll import those photos into Aperture and then tweak them in Photoshop using the Edit in External Editor command. My preferences for the external editor in Aperture were set to 8-bit, Photoshop
    With Photoshop CS 5, I would edit the photo and choose Save and the edited photo would be saved back to Aperture as a new version, in a JPEG format.
    Now, using Photoshop CS 5.1, when the imported image from Aperture is converted into a PSD file and when I save back to Aperture, I end up with a PSD file.
    How can I revert to how it was before? JPEG image in Aperture, opened in external editor Photoshop as a JPEG, edited in Photoshop, then saved back to Aperture as a new version JPEG?
    (Though this question is approached in this forum, a solution to my question is never found as each dicussion ends up going off-topic from the original question)

    clapperincus wrote:
    Any further ideas from anyone who's experienced trying to open a JPEG from Aperture in Photoshop as a JPEG?
    Like I said before, you cannot open a jpeg as a jpeg, the file must be decompressed to open in PS or in Aperture, and that has always been the case.
    I do not know how it used to work, but I tested and you are correct that with PS 12.1 and with Aperture 3.2.2 a JPEG sent to open in external editor (PS) is opened into your choice of lossless format and then goes back to Aperture in the lossless format you chose.
    IMO this is the way it should be, because every save into JPEG loses image data, so such saves should be limited to the final export, in this case when the image actually leaves Aperture. If the file was compressed as a JPEG  when leaving PS, decompressed and edited in Aperture, then compressed again to export as JPEG from Aperture, unnecessary additional image data loss would occur.
    It is always better to save the application of lossy compression until the very last step in a workflow because other usages (printing, for instance) may occur before applying the lossy compression.
    -Allen

  • Why is saturation reduced in my HDR results when comparing with the original images?

    Yesterday I took several sets of RAW images with Panasonic LX3 to perform HDR.
    However, the HDR results look less colorful than the original images, they became dreamy, blurry and unrealistic.
    Is it because every set only has 3 images with different exposures?

    You would probably get a better answer if you posted this in the Photoshop forum. This forum is for Lightroom, which is a quite different animal.
    Hal

  • The selected original image is either offline or not found. Please reconnect it and try again.

    Hi to all, This is my first time here. I am having a problem that I've never had before. I am attempting to upload images to Flickr, which I do daily without trouble. However, this time I'm getting the message: "The selected original image is either offline or not found. Please reconnect it and try again." I am doing searches on my MacBook by copying and pasting the jpeg name in to the finder and they seem to be gone. I have taken special care to file my photos in certain folders. Either I have inadvertanly deleted entire folders or something very odd has happened. Can anyone shed any light on this? Thank you

    Hi, Thank you for the response.
    I'm on 10.7.5 OS
    Ver. 3.4.3 Aperture
    I have a folder on my desktop named "photo imports" I insert my card to the reader on my MacBook Pro and copy the files in to a folder nested within the Photo imports according to which camera I am using or sometimes it is a special project. This folder is on my computer's hard drive. 
    I then go in to Aperture and click "Import" I select in the "Store Files" menu: "in their current location"
    This has been working nicely for me. I use Time Machine on a somewhat regular basis and I also use other editing software like Picassa and View NX2 (Nikon software)
    I suppose that it is possible that I accidently dragged my folder in to the trash, but I really do try to be careful about that sort of thing. I have gone back in to Time Machine and have been unable to find the files. It is vexing. My granddaughter has been asking me for those particular pictures and the only way to view them is in Aperture on my computer because I am unable to email or export them in any way.

  • Reducing the Resolution of a Referenced Original Image

    I made the mistake of taking photos in very high resolution, and then importing the originals into my Aperture Library as referenced images.  Now my hard drive is completely full (and I've already disabled and deleted Previews), so I'm trying to reduce the resolution of the original images using Aperture.  After much reading, it seems that I'll need to Export Versions at a reduced size, Import the new versions into Aperture, and Delete the old originals.  Seriously?!?  Before I venture down this horrific path, please let me know if there is an easier solution.  Thanks!

    As Terence said -- the easy thing is built-in and recommended: select the Images whose Originals you want to relocate, and relocate them to external drives.  External drives are _bargains_ right now.  I recommend -- seriously -- buying them in triplicate: one as your "working data" store, and two to use as back-ups (never have all three in the same physical location).
    Storage is so cheap, on fact, that even though for this one set of pictures you recorded a higher resolution than you need, I still wouldn't bother "down-sizing" those Originals -- particularly if you have made _any_ changes via adjustments or metadata.  Change your camera settings, and just live with a little extra data spinning around.
    Here is the page in the User Manual on relocating your Originals (click from the contents listed at the top).
    Note, too, the following, from the page Basic Components of Aperture:
    Using referenced images in your Aperture system provides a number of substantial benefits to your photography workflow. For example, you can incorporate your existing portfolio of images into Aperture without changing the current location of the files. Importing images by reference does not result in a duplication of your image files in the Aperture library, thus saving hard disk space. You can also connect and disconnect hard disks holding your referenced images’ masters as you need them. This allows you to keep masters for less-used images offline or to make specific types of images available for editing or adjustments as needed. Using referenced images in your Aperture system lets you build a flexible image management system customized to your work style. (Emphasis mine.)
    For my personal Libary, I keep 4★, 5★, Portfolio Images, and anything recorded in the last 45 days on my laptop's system drive.  Every other Original is relocated to a 2 TB external drive.
    I find Previews _very_ useful (both in and out of Aperture), and even rely on them as a sort of emergency back-up of last resort.  I recommend you rebuild yours.

  • Deleting original images in referenced library

    Stupid question - but how do you delete original images in a referenced library?  I have used the function "File>Delete original image and all versions" and I thought that this had permanently deleted some originals that I didn't want - but when I look in finder, they're still there on the hard drive, they just don't display any more in Aperture.  I can't believe you have to go and find the original file in finder to delete it...?  What have I missed?
    Thanks!

    OK, have worked out that when I empty the aperture trash I need to tick the little box that says 'move referenced files to system trash' or something like that...
    So...next question: how do I get the files that I've failed to delete properly back into Aperture so I can delete them properly - given that I don't know what files they are...

  • Is there an easy way to convert original images to b&w ?

    I have a canon 5d mark II and when I decide to shoot b&w pics, this is what i do : I set my camera to b&w and shoot raw+jpeg. raw files come out in color all the time but jpegs show up in b&w when i import them . I decided to do so as it is very time consuming to convert the original images to b&w one by one.
    Is there an easy way to do it?? Any suggestions? 

    Little known hint well worth knowing:
    If you use the menu selection "Photos→Add Adjustment" or "Photos→Add Adjustment Preset", the operation is done to all selected images.
    In addition to what Frank says, you could also apply a B&W Adjustment Preset when the files are imported.  These adjustments are like any others -- they can be toggled on and off, removed, and adjusted with the settings in the Bricks used.
    For grayscale, it is well worth the time exploring the included Presets and the slider controls.  Afaik, sophisticated grayscale photographers optimize their images in color prior to converting to grayscale.
    JPG is 8-bit and lossy.  RAW is (up to) 16-bit and unconverted (no loss of data, but "lossless" isn't quite right).  If the JPG conversion and quality suffices, there is little reason to shoot RAW+JPEG.
    In essence, you can use the in-camera-created grayscale JPGs, with their fixed and baked-in conversion settings, or you can use Aperture's broad (and time-consuming) grayscale controls.  If you do the latter, and settle on a conversion that works for your camera and subject(s), save it as an Adjustment Preset and use it.

  • Aperture Library to Adobe Lightroom?

    Hello,
    Does anyone know of a way, or have any ideas, of how to share my Aperture library with Adobe Lightroom? I like both programs for different reasons and was curious if there was a way to at the very least export my Aperture Library in a way that I can import it in Lightroom? I eventually want to move both of these to an external hard drive as well..
    Thanks!

    Well, I just tried this... with one file. What I discovered, makes sense. The original file is not 'syched' because the original is not modified with non-destructive editing. All of the "edits" to the original files seem to reside within the programs, and not with the files. I wouldn't know where to look for this edit data in Lightroom, but I'm pretty sure that in Aperture the edit instructions being stored in the Aperture Library, even if the file is refrenced. This would be an interesting piece of code for someone to work on..... i.e. make a change in Aperture, and Lightroom reads that change from the Aperture library, and vice a versa.
    Not sure that anyone would really want to do this on a long term basis as I sincerely doubt that there is something that on program can do that the other can't. (Except that Lightroom does not make books or have a Lighttable). If for instance you created a bunch of great edits in Lightroom and wanted to used those edits in an Aperture book, you would, at this time, have to export the edited versions and import them into Aperture - at least that seems to me to be the current requirements.
    MacPro 2.66 4 GB   Mac OS X (10.4.8)  

  • Uninstalling and retrieving original images?

    When I first installed Aperture I set it to import all my original images in their relevant folders into the one main Aperture library stored in my pictures folder. Now that I want to uninstall Aperture I'm kinda lost as to how I retrieve all those original images and hopefully still in their named folders?
    Thanks in advance for any help.

    You want to export the Masters:
    File-> Export -> Masters
    Regards
    TD

Maybe you are looking for

  • BAPI for Purchase info record creation

    Hi Please let me know how to create purchase info record through BAPI, with tax codes along with material price. please guide me. Simha

  • Why does it say to go to itune store support when I try n purchase sum gems?

    When I try n purchase gems it says to contact itune store support to complete the transaction

  • Will not startup...help!

    Hello, Yesterday startup took forever for the first time... Over 10 mins on grey screen. Today worse, at first just grey screen, then pressing on off button a second time got only flashing folder with a question mark on it.... Tried again, same thing

  • Authorization for different user

    HI i want send a message to one user using abap code. on this process i have to restrict message sending to AUTHORITY CHECK OBJECT. we have option for self(sy-uname) AUTHORITY CHECK OBJECT useing following way. AUTHORITY CHECK OBJECT Object_name     

  • Currencies in Leading ledger

    Friends, I am going to create non-leading ledger. My company in in US. for that company i am going to create non-leading ledgers for extension of business in india. In the above situation for existing company  2nd local currency and 3rd local currenc