Aperture very slow

Has anyone come across this issue when the MAC just freezes up or runs very slow when aperture in use? its like the things is running on solar energy an its night time! can someone help please? any quick fixes? i run a MAC OSX version 10.7.2, 3.06Ghz core 2 duo, 2GB 800mHz DDR2 SDRAM
Any insights appreciated
M

With only 900 MB that doesn't surprise me.
You need to seriously look into either deleting or moving a bunch files.
OmniDiskSweeper will point out the files and folders that are taking up the largest amounts of disk space.
Running with such a small amount of free space has greatly increased the cahnces that your hard drive is corrupt. So after you free up space, you really should boot from another device and repair the disk with Disk Utility.
Allan

Similar Messages

  • Mac Pro with Aperture - very slow

    Why, why couldn't it be faster?
    I've been reading about the Mac Pros since they were announced last week. The local Apple store finally got one and I went to go see it. And there it was -- 42 lb glory, standard configuration, driving a 30" screen.
    I launched Aperture... and it's slow. I mean really slow, spinning pizza wheel slow. Granted I'm trying to bring up full size raw images that are ~16-18 meg each. But come on -- this is a workstation class machine! The "fastest Mac ever"!!!
    Showed it to the guy working there. He said they installed the box today with a brand new disk image and sometimes the image is bad. "Ben" promised he'll call their engineers to see what's up.
    So what's going on here? Some ideas:
    * Aperture is very Core Image intensive, and the standard GeForce 7300 card isn't that fast. I plan to upgrade to Radeon X1900XT - people say that will likely make Aperture faster.
    * The photo files were huge, 16 to 18 mb each. Raw images my camera takes are 6 meg. At least until I upgrade my camera.
    * The box had 1gb of memory - standard configuration. Would more help?
    * Maybe there really is something wrong with the box or the disk image.
    Disappointing...
    Mac Mini   Mac OS X (10.4.7)  

    I dont really post very often here but i think it is yet time to give again out a few pointers about Mac performance ...
    1) Whatever the configuration ... Ram is essential and shall never be ignored .
    2) Whatever the hardware platform your machine is running on check your software version and keep up to date , that goes 20 times for anything Universal Binary.
    3) When treating high volume files Hard drive space is ESSENTIAL and not only necessary and frankly setting up a raid from a Mac is still seamless and fast.
    If you all made it through to this point then your mac is becoming a powerhouse never slows down and really smiles and keeps on coming ... i have been running G5 machines for a long time on mac os X servers since the G5s came out and before that were yet G4s . First thing you need when dealing with large files is RAM second drives and third software versions.
    I would not dream running anything with 512 mb of ram at all that is a constant on all macs , you have a memory expansion capability to 16GB mmm that shall really help .
    Further you have 4 bays for drives ... may i dare think they are here for some reason such as treating high volumes files ?
    Third and foremost when using nvidia cards dont expect superb performance on a 30" screen when using the FX4500 card since nvidia cards have a really bad record on that matter with the G5 .. would you deal with massive 3D open GL etc etc etc ... ATI is it plain simple and really outperforming it has always been the case for macs .
    Yes, ATI X1900XT are rare now because of delays but the cards are no slugs on a mac and they mean business when running on 30" screens . A pci-x X800xt radeon card running on a previous dual processor machine kept kicking the Quadro running off a PCI-e on a quad machine ... we then tested with a X1900xt prototype and again the world changed .. all the things the nvidia card could not deal with the X1900xt just smiled at and kept on chomping non stop .
    I did not still get aperture since i have yet little need for it but my educated guess would be that with a little ram a nice set of raid array (you dont need 15k rpm drives unless you treat live HD solely on a internal array) and or an Xraid setup the machine would just scream in performance. If you use the machine for production processing power of the chip is just a tiny part of the whole performance equation thinking about streamlining your pipelines and data flow takes your setup to whole new grounds.
    A quad running 4D server Maya some data backups mysql and about 103 processes is occupied about 10 percent load averages .....
    secondly regarding disk images and apple installs errr please take the time to install everything from scratch i am guessing aperture you just have seen running might be using rosetta and is just a transfer from a G5 that would explain performance issues . 18 Mb a picture is not huge ... we use about 100Mg images on PS maya strata etc etc etc and frankly image size with a bit of ram never has been an issue.
    G5 Quad 2.5 7TB xraid 16GB of ram.   Mac OS X (10.4.7)   Mac os X server 10.4.7

  • Aperture very slow on mac pro 8 core

    I have a very new mac pro that can't seem to run aperture at a usable speed at all. My 4 year old G5 was able to run it faster, using the same library. When I move between pictures, or even try and change rating, the whole computer comes to a halt and I can't do or click on anything. After about 10 - 30 seconds I can start working again. This is the same with just about any feature in aperture. I have checked the task list and it is empty. This is running with the library on the boot drive and on a secondary drive. The performance is the same. Any ideas??

    Library size does matter, and Aperture doesn't handle big libraries well when it comes to speed. It shouldn't matter but it does.
    My own library is around 65k images and growing rapidly. If I was to have all these images on one drive, or a RAID, and perform a search of an image with spotlight, I would get results in only a few seconds, with Aperture it's like pulling your hair out and is very painful to perform a search.
    If I wanted to search my entire album I must be prepared to watch the spinning beach ball for quite a few minutes, and every click or keyboard type takes another few minutes. I don't know why this is, or why the finder runs rings around Aperture, even iView can perform a whole library search in a matter of seconds.
    I think it is because Aperture is trying to show you all the thumbnails or present a graphical view of all the images when you choose library or all images. All I am doing is asking Aperture to consider all the data in all images before I perform my search, but Aperture wants to do everything.
    I really hope that the engineers work on this issue for version 2, and also come up with a better captioning window than is currently in use. I use PhotoMechanic to caption everything before it even touched Aperture, which makes Apple's programme by post-event workflow rather than my live workflow. An IPTC window such as PhotoMechanic's would be very welcome. If anyone else agrees please add it to the feedback page.
    Anyway, back to the performance. Certain operations, even with plenty of RAM and a good graphics card, can lead to almost snail like performance with large Aperture libraries. I doubt an Octo-Mac (as I like to call them), or even a 50-core Mac with 60Gb RAM and a 20GB video card would make any difference. The application needs updating in that respect.

  • Aperture very slow loading the next image...

    OK, I've trawled the forums but I can't find a specific answer.
    Firstly, I'm using a low spec iMac (2007 2.4GHz C2D with 4GB RAM, Radeon HD 2600 - 256MB VRAM on 10.8.2) but I'm not convinced this is the issue.
    When I navigate through photos (Sony Alpha and Canon EOS RAW) there's a major delay of up to 20 seconds when the image shows "Loading" with a spining gear wheel-thing (not a colour wheel).  The delay is worse on the 17Mpixel Canon files.
    I've check what the activity monitor is doing during this and the memory seems fine, I still have over 1GB free and no pages in/out or RAM activity of any kind.  The CPU goes ballistic - 180% on Aperture - it's really working.  Given the file size/delay difference, I'm assuming the image is being generated with adjustments composited etc.
    I thought the previews were supposed to address this by providing a cached image so my question is; is there any way of checking the previews are being accessed?  I've deleted the previews from a selection, re-generated using a couple of size setting in prefs, they've been generated but still no speed-up.
    I've also done a permissions repair both in disk utility and cmd-option launch of Aperture. No difference.
    Thanks for any help in advance, Dave

    I've also done a permissions repair
    If you have a corrupted library the permission repair alone may not suffice. Have you also repaired or rebuild the library?
    Repairing and Rebuilding Your Aperture Library: Aperture 3 User Manual
    if that does not help, check, if you have incompatible video codecs installed:
    Aperture 3: May be unresponsive or have slower performance with third-party video codec
    Regards
    Léonie

  • Aperture very slow to load on i7 Macbook Pro

    I recently purchased an i7 Macbook Pro, and the first thing I did was to load Aperture 3. After installation, it opened in around 5 seconds. I proceeded to install other software (firefox, iWork etc. etc.) and when I went to start Aperture afterwards, it now starts in around 2 - 3 MINUTES!
    I have rebuilt the system a number of times over the past few days, and think I have found the culprit - iWork. When it's loaded, it seems to kill the load times for Aperture. I'm not 100% sure it's iWork, but has anyone else had a similar problem?
    If so, has anyone got any ideas on how to fix it?
    Cheers

    Also try a few of the following
    Run System Maintenance, start with Disk Utility>repair permissions,
    Delete the Aperture user prefs
    Even run the steps listed on the Aperture 3: Troubleshooting Basics page
    http://support.apple.com/kb/HT3805
    Tony

  • Aperture is very slow

    Aperture very slow with the latest version and the library on a seperate HD.
    How can ths be helped

    Before you give up. do one more test, please: At least try to find out if the slowness is caused
    by your Aperture library,
    your user account settings,
    or your system(hardware).
    To check if the Aperture library is making problems, create a new one and run Aperture from that library (File -> Switch to library -> Other/New). If everything sems to be o.k. with a new library, you should be able to correct the slowness be importing your old library in to the new one.
    To check if your user settings are problematic launch Aperture from a different account. If you can work from a different account without problems report back.
    If you cannot run Aperture successfully from a different account on a new library you have a system wide problem, and then try to reinstall Aperture. If that does not help, report back - maybe your system or hardware need trouble shooting,
    Regards
    Léonie

  • Aperture 3.1.3 Very slow importing raw files

    Aperture 3.1.3 Very slow importing raw files please help
    Pro Photographer. I have a Mac Pro Quad core 1 yr old with 12GB Ram. I import via 2 Firewire 800 card readers - A Lexar & a UDMR Reader.Only using them singly. System has 4 1TB hard drives 1. Applications, 2. Aperture Library, 3. Aperture Vault, 4 Time Machine
    On a photo shoot, first CF card may download and complete in less than a minute but the next card with a similar number of images may take 10 minutes.
    Sometimes if I swap card readers, this can speed up download but then everything slowly grinds to a halt.
    I have closed down all other programmes, switched off Faces and Enable Gestures - switched off  Look up places.
    Situation driving me nuts as we shoot and view images with customers immediately after the session and download time effecting the amount of time we have to do this. Nothing seems logical as such a high spec machine should theoretically fly through this.

    Have you upgraded your OS ans all your Apps to the latest Versions and also rebooted the system?
    Turn on the Activity Viewer (Windows ->Show Activity) while importing, to see how Aperture is spending its time.
    Also launch some tools from the Application -> Utilities folder:
    launch the Console window, to check for diagnostics /error messages
    launch the Activity Viewer, to see how much RAM and CPU time Aperture and other processes are using.
    How much space is free on your system drive? And on the drive you are importing to?
    If you find in the Activity Viewer, that Aperture is slow, but de facto using not much CPU time, then the problem may be a corrupted Aperture Library or corrupted preference files.
    Try to import into a new, empty Aperture library and see if the problem persists.
    If you have no problems with a new Library, try the Aperture 3: Troubleshooting Basics:
    http://support.apple.com/kb/HT3805
    Start with repairing permissions and repairing the library.
    If none of the measures outlined there, or you need further help, please report back.
    Regards
    Léonie

  • Aperture Library Very Slow Copy to LaCie Thunderbolt Drive

    Just installed new LaCie Thunderbolt drive and copying various media files to it. Music and video files copied like a rocket. My Aperture folder is copying as slow as molasses. Right now it says 2 days to copy 211GB. Any help would be appreciated.

    Sorry, I misread Mtn Ed's last note.  My USB2 was stalling out at 2-3 MB per second.  Quite a bit slower than the stated Thunderbolt rate to say the least.  There is a portion of the Aperture Library that copies at a very slow speed, but after an hour or so it kicks back up to normal file transfer rates.  Finder was originally estimating over 20 hours for the copy to complete.  Now the total elapsed time will be about 3 hours for 350GB.

  • Aperture 3.5 running Very Slow

    Good Evening
    Aperture is now running very slow and get the spinning wheel alot, even worse whe trying to open NIK add ons, didn't get this before the upgrade, anyone else experiancing this ? also unable to import an old aperture Libary into 3.5, i get the message that it was created with an older version !
        Cheers

    Same problem.
    Library access is very slow.
    I have restored my library after crash and now i have 250.000 previews to recreate (very big library : 2To but no problem before aperture 3.5) it's very long, about 20.000 previews by day.

  • Very slow Aperture on MacBook Pro 2.16 Duo

    Hi All,
    This is most likely a topic that has been covered before but Ive looked and cant find the answer. Ive got a 1.5 yr old MacBook Pro 2.16 intel duo with 2GB RAM (its maximum )
    I bought Aperture 2 a few months ago, and its now started to run very, very very slow. I store my referenced files on a Lacie Drive (USB 2), however the issue seems to be that when I start browsing, exporting, editing and generally moving around the program, it gets to a point when the beach ball is on spinning overload. My Mac's fan is wizzing round like mad, It sounds like the things going to take off! Im really starting to lose faith and seriously looking at lightroom, but I love the structure on aperture. I have taken my Laptop to a mac store and even they have had a look over it, and cant understand why it runs slow. Its really disappointing that if its a hardware issue I cant do anything about it, plus I easily surpass the min specs to run it. Its holding up my workflow and costing me money in delivering files to clients!
    Any help what so ever would be great,
    Cheers Guys
    Matt

    I'm running the same model Duo with a 120GB drive and an external LaCie. It does not support the 800 Firewire, just the 400.
    Aperture runs adequately fast, although after two months I'm still learning a lot about the features. The search HUD seems a bit slow, but I do have alot of pictures.
    My Aperture Library is 14GB, 13,000 files, 90% are jpegs. All picture files are referenced and take up an additional 17GB.
    I found Aperture (and Parallels) choking whenever the free space on my internal drive gets down below 6-8GB. Some non-Apple forums recommend keeping at least 10GB free for working with media intensive apps like Aperture. I also find that even when I quit Aperture, it doesn't free up the temp space on the disk drive it had used. Restarting regularly recovers the 1.5GB or so that Aperture was leaving behind after quitting.
    I'm slowing breaking the big project I had with 11,000 files into several smaller projects and migrating the referenced files to an external LaCie. File management, renaming files, finding duplicates, etc., is not an Aperture strong point, (Expression Media is better at file and metadata management, but has limited editing and integration features with iLife, etc.) but over all I'm satisfied with performance on the Core Duo with an external monitor attached.
    Cheers,
    Flack

  • Aperture suddenly becomes very slow opening library

    Hi.
    I've got only 100 or so photos, and Aperture suddenly becomes very slow, it take a couple of minutes now to open the library.
    Just before this started to happen, I got a very short massage, saying something like, "It's repairing some files."
    I wonder if there are some corrupt files there, causing very slow opening the program.
    Is there any way to check this and fix this problem?
    I'm using 3.4.3, and OS 10.8.3.
    I appreciate your help.
    Hiro

    I'm surprised nobody has responded to this yet. Hopefully you have already figured it out, but if you double click on the aperture library while holding down the option and command keys, Aperture will bring up a dialog that gives you three options for dealing with potential library issues: repair permissions, repair the library or rebuild the library. You should try them in that order, and it is a good idea to back up your library first (especially before rebuilding the library).
    Hope this helps.

  • Why aperture running very slow?

    I just installed additional ram and the other day aperture was running extremely slow. The only other application was iphoto.
    How much CPU power does aperture require?
    thanks.

    sharon108 wrote:
    After consolidating iPhoto pictures into Aperture Library - and having to rebuild library all photos are shown under "Other" in storage under About this Mac.  How do I get photos back into the Photo section.  I am sure this is why Aperture is running very slow.  Aperture library is on a 500 GB external USB hard drive.  Does anyone know how to get photos into the right spot in the storage. 
    Nothing in my experience would make me draw the same conclusion (that the reporting of your Aperture Library as "Other" is why Aperture is running slowly).  You report that your Library is on an external drive connected via USB.  Is this USB 2 or USB 3?
    The consensus is to put your Library on your fastest (lowest latency and highest throughput) drive.  This is almost always your system drive.  If your Library does not fit on your system drive, you are advised to move some or all of your Images' Master from the Library to a second drive using "File→Relocate Masters".  If you want help with these set-ups, post back.

  • Aperture 3 is very slow!!

    When working with aperture 3 it is very very slow,

    Don Carlo,
    Got it. If your Library successfully converted and completely reprocessed, then you are half way there.
    Assuming that you have a copy of AP2 backed up somewhere, and a copy of your AP3 library backed up as well. I would try something like this:
    -- First of all, try the "Safe Boot/Regular Boot" cycle. That may be all you need. After this, start Aperture and if it wants to process anything - let it. Click on the display and see if it hangs anywhere. Many of the problems reported come from corrupted images - often a large TIFF with spot and patch repairs or retouches. Remove (export or delete) offending images until you can fix them and bring them back. Assuming you still have your master, at worst you are going to lose your adjustments and AP3 has more an better tools.)
    If this hasn't helped:
    -- Rename one of your AP3 Libraries to something like Test, or "Gawd-I-Hope -This-Works!."
    -- Delete Aperture 2 and 3 from your working system. You may want to try something like Appzapper to make sure your have removed all vestiges. You can try running the Bergsma Bash to see if any of the cache/prefs files are still around. Trash them if they are.
    -- Run software update to be sure you have everything. It has been suggested that you may get better results running the "Combo" update directly from the Apple site, that way there is no chance of any element being left out.
    -- Your software being at the latest level of Snow Leopard, install Aperture 3.0 and update to the latest version.
    At this point, start AP3 and point it at your test Library. It may or may not want to reprocess all of your images. If it does - let it. Watch to display to identify any possible problems.
    All of this done, and assuming an Intel machine, 4GB of RAM, and at least 30% free space on your Library disk, AP3 should be screamingly fast. Many of us have found real benefits from a one-time defrag. (I use iDefrag in the "Quick" mode.)
    If this works, the put your test Libary where you want it, named what you want. Delete the extra copy of the Library and BACK EVERYTHING UP!
    Bottom line: on even a minimal Intel machine, AP3 is much, much faster than AP2, and that includes a Library with thousands of 100+ MB TIFF files, using brush edits.
    Hope this is helpful,

  • Aperture is very slow with Snow Leopard

    Hello,
    I updated my MyBook with Snow Leopard. The (big) problem is that Aperture 2.1.4 is now very slow when I make change to images. CPU usage is very high and Aperture is unusable.
    What can I do?
    Thanks in advance.

    zemitch - I also use one of the slowest machines capable of running SL, but my your graphics card may be different than mine. But I also store my masters on an external drive and that wasn't the issue.
    I found rebuilding the database of Aperture when starting up helps a bit, but the biggest improvement is to do cropping/straightening AFTER the other adjustments. That changes my workflow, but with no crop/straighten, the other adjustments didn't not show the horrible slowdown.
    See if that helps you.

  • Mid-2010 27" iMac very slow, even after clean OS install - HELP!

    Good afternoon guys, I'm hoping someone can offer me some advice.
    I bought my Mid-2010 27" iMac in May-ish 2011. Everything was brilliant, I couldn't believe the ease of use, and especially the start up speed, coming from a world of PCs. My iMac was used almost every day, for web browsing, photo editing, etc.
    Maybe about April / May this year it started becoming very slow, slow to boot, slow to respond to mouse clicks, slow to do anything. Since I'd used about 750GB of my HDD (mainly photos), I decided I would archive some and hope that would ease the congestion. As my photos were stored in Aperture, it took about 3 days to export them all to my external HDD, 3 days of the iMac only getting so far, switching itself off, then me finally getting it to come back on (I was getting messages about Kernals, etc. now and again through boot too) - it finally backed up my photos I have from my daughters first year.
    Great news, but I still had probably 400GB / 500GB of photos from her second year and any other photos I'd taken. I found the root of my Aperture directory, and managed to pull these images off, so everything is now backed up.
    I decided I should try and clean install, and managed to get the HDD to boot and choose the option to re-install from Apple's Servers. All installed OK, and we're good to go! Fired up the iMac, and although it's fractionally quicker to respond, and a lot more stable, it's not quite right. And I've lost all my iLife Apps which originally came with the iMac.
    Does this sound like a HDD issue? As I say, it was on quite a lot through the backup procedure, and I had set it (maybe stupidly looking back now) to never sleep, and for the monitor to only switch off after 3 hours. Or does it sound like something more is wrong with it?
    I am quite confident of working with PCs, so would manage to replace the HDD I think, looking at some videos, etc. online. I did upgrade the RAM to 16GB, and that was simple enough. My question is, when you replace the HDD, how does it know where to look to the Apple Servers for the clean OS install? Or do I have to do something to let it know where to look first? I have to point out I don't have any Time Machine backup, etc. as the iMac was just not stable enough to get this in place - and up until that point, again probably stupid now looking back, I had never bothered to set up.
    Any help / advice on this matter would be greatly appreciated. At the moment I have totally fallen out of love with the iMac, for something to cost £1,500+ and only last 3 years, where my last build PC lasted Approx 8 years for half the price, is very disappointing.
    Thanks in advance,
    Col

    Just suggesting things right off the bat here-
    To me it sounds as though the HDD is failing, if your iMac shipped with a Seagate drive try entering your serial number to see if Apple will replace it:http://www.apple.com/au/support/imac-harddrive/
    Or try running Apple Hardware Test a few times back to see if it is a hardware error.
    As for the iLife apps they should've come on one of the install discs that shipped with your mac.
    If your iMac is ineligible for the program above I would consider replacing it yourself with either an SSD or HDD, as for recognising apples servers for download, you will need the original install discs that came with your computer or if you haven't already it will need a firmware update to enable internet recovery
    See here:Computers that can be upgraded to use OS X Internet Recovery
    Good Luck!

Maybe you are looking for

  • Dynamic creation of classes

    hi there i was wondering if it was possible to create an instance of a class (AS 2.0) at runtime, given just a string value for the class name eg, my first attempt was something like var class_str:String = "MyClass1"; var inst bject = new eval(class_

  • My entire address book has disappeared, and I don't know how to retrieve it. HELP!!!

    When I tried to address mail to a regular contact, no address appeared. I then opened the address book, and discovered that all my contacts were missing from both collected and personal addresses. How do I get them back??

  • IMac G5 vs PowerMac G5

    I currently own a dual 2GHz PowerMac G5. I'm still paying it off (darn you MBNA) and am thinking of selling it and switching to a iMac G5. I would be using the computer for every day activities as well as editing with Final Cut Pro 4.5 HD. Will there

  • Undefined status for process chains

    Hello, - when do you choose undefined status (grey) for process chains? (in what cases) Thanks

  • PowerPoint Slides and Master Slides

    I want to know if its possible to insert a PP presentation to a Captivate 5 Master Slide template. I looked at the Master Slide properties and i selected both options but the Master Slide information overwrites the slide presetantion. can anyone let