Aperture with iMac 24"

Hi! I'm new in this discussions.
I would like to know what do you think with this combination:
Apple iMac 24" 3.0.6GHZ with 4GB RAM running Aperture.
I'm not a really professional photographer but I shot 15/20.000 photos by year.
Now I'm using an iMac 2.16GHZ C2D + 3GB RAM 20" and there are a slow reaction with a project with 50/100photos. I know that this is not a great machine to run Aperture but...
I'm looking for a new Apple iMac 24" 3.0.6GHZ with 4GB RAM.
Please tell me some about your experience.
At home I have a Powermac G4 733. So many years ago I bought PRO mac but now there's no a lot of money...
Thanks to all
Koferc
p.s.
sorry about my english

I went from an old (white) iMac with 2GB RAM to a 2.8Ghz 24" iMac with 4GB RAM. Aperture renders the RAW images in about twice the speed. The adjustments are still clunky especially when the image is cropped or zoomed but this seems to be an issue for many people even those with Mac Pro's.

Similar Messages

  • Aperture with iMac i7 3.4 AMD Radeon HD 6970M 2GB GDDR5

    I am looking to upgrade to the new iMac i7 3.4 (spring 2011).
    Currently I am running Aperture 3 via a MacBook Pro 2.66 (NVIDIA GeForce 9600M GT 512 Ram) along with 8GB DDR3 Ram.
    Just wondering if anyone has purchased the new 27" iMac i7 3.4 with AMD Radeon HD 6970M 2GB GDDR5 and 16GB DDR3 of Ram?
    If so do you see the performance of Aperture 3 running better?
    I know that Aperture runs better with more GPU, so I would assume the performance would be better?
    Thanks,
    Stu

    That box will rock Aperture if you order it with an SSD. IMO using hard drives for boot drives is obsolete.
    In my case Aperture (3.1.2) on the 2011 17" MBP (OS 10.6.7, 8 GB RAM, HD 6750M; a weaker box than the iMac you suggest) with Apple's SSD imports 3 GB of RAW+JPEG images in much less than a minute and has those images fully processed in about 5 minutes. IMO hella fast. And edits (with both the Aperture Library and referenced Masters on the SSD) are essentially instant.
    Only problems with the better Thunderbolt iMacs are:
    • Glossy-only display that not everyone can tolerate.
    • Hard drives are only upgradable by Apple, a sucky new trick in Apple's bag.
    But as far as Aperture performance goes all the top end Thunderbolt boxes will be spectacular. I cannot say enough good things about Aperture performance on SSD setups; IMO no Aperture user should buy a box without SSD.
    HTH
    -Allen

  • Aperture with iMac G5

    I use a non-iSight 2 gHz iMac G5 (non-Intel) with 2 gB of RAM. It has the ATI (0x1002) display card and Aperture Compatibilty Checker says it's OK for Aperture.
    Most of the ads Apple runs for Aperture seem to show big Cinema Displays, which means they are running on a big Mac box, I suppose.
    Has any one had experience of running Aperture on an iMac like mine and, if so, could you please comment on speed? I'm concerned that the application may be too slow on my single processor iMac and don't want to commit without some empirical feedback on the speed issue.
    I will be using mostly RAW files from a Canon EOS 5D full frame digital SLR, some 12mB in size or 72mB when converted to 16 bit PSD files using ACR.
    Thank you.

    Thanks all for those very helpful answers.
    Let me try a quantitative question.
    Here is how long it takes for three different file
    sizes to load on my iMac G5 in PS CS2, with 1.3gB of
    the toal of 2gB memory dedicated to PS:
    5 mB JPG - 2 seconds
    50 mB TIF - 7 seconds
    250 mB TIF - 10 seconds
    What would the comparable times for Aperture be,
    appoximately?
    It's hard to compare directly like that for two reasons - one, the system factors for performance are different and two, the what you are doing with images internally is very different.
    Consider your load time of a 50MB TIFF. What to compare in Aperture? I'll use a 63MB 16-bit TIFF on my computer (specs below) as an example:
    * Import itself takes 5 seconds
    * Switching to the image in Aperture to work with takes two or three seconds, unless you've already been working with it in Aperture you have loaded - then it's zero seconds.
    * Exporting a changed version of the TIFF takes about twelve seconds.
    For Photoshop, you are always loading a set of pixels, working with them, and saving them each time.
    In Aperture since you are just working with instructions to alter the image and do not really have pixels until you export, things are much faster while you are working - every time you want to evaluate or make small changes to the image it's very quick as you have only the three second load time switching to the image (which goes to zero if you are switching between that and a few other images in Aperture, only the first load takes that long).
    Furthermore in Photoshop you are working with different bit depths, working on 8-bit images is faster than using 16-bit images. In Aperture even if you import an 8-bit image it's being worked on as a 16-bit image internally in terms of adjustments, but this costs you nothing in terms of space since your original file is always used as a base. You did not say what bit depth your images are which I think would make a difference for Photoshop.
    I noted before another difficultly being system factors in performance. The times I am seeing are a combiantion of the processor speed and video card capabilities - not just the processor alone. So in the example you gave I literally have no way of giving you truly comparible numbers because you did not say what video card you have. I have no way to tell you if Aperture performance would be better or worse for you.

  • Aperture with iMac G5-useable?

    Hey there.
    This might just be one-of -those questions that's way too subjective to be answered, but here it goes.
    I shoot Raw with cr2 files (around 7mb) and a trying to set up a workflow that will enable me to (now with 1.5) be able to reference created Jpegs in iPhoto and whatever other iLife apps. This is where useability comes into it with the X600XT graphics card (min req). Being so Gpu intense and probably only importing 50 Raws/week I wonder if (after previews are constructed) a G5 will slow down to a crawl with basic editing adjustments and maybe with PSE3 running in the foreground. This is basically what I thought of doing:
    1- Use Capture1 as the converter >jpeg or tiff (ltd adj in PSE for 16bit)> import to PSE3(if needed) >save jpegs to iPhoto>ditch raws (for space) and save externally. This scenario will be speedy with my hardware but may introduce keywording problems, exporting and importing.
    2- Import to Aperture >use PSE as external editor if required >selected Jpegs can be viewed within iPhot
    Why make use of iPhoto as well? Some thing cannot be done with Aperture and my wife likes it's uncomplicated use.
    So one scenarion will be great with my hardware but everything is seperated and the other is integrated with iLife but how slow will it run?
    As yet I haven't bought Aperture, nor Capture1 LE. Cost is not so relevant between the two, well it will be US115 as I can get a student discount.
    Maybe will post this in the G5 forum as well as I didn't know where this question really belonged.
    Cheers all

    I've got the same computer with the max RAM and the 250GB disk. I shoot a canon 350d in RAW. All of the standard image adjustments run well - contrast, color balance, highlight/shadow. Even the more sophisticated ones like the noise reduction and sharpening run well. The ones that don't run well include the spot and patch feature - If you want to fix 20 spots on an image don't use Aperture - send a version to your external editor and fix them there. The straighten tool can be slow if you use the mouse to control it - but if you use the sliders you can control it. My library is over 5000 images and it contains RAW from the canon, JPGs from my P&S and a lot of TIFF files from my slide scanner (up to 60MB). I don't have any trouble with the preview generation process although I told the program to make the previews no larger than 1900 by 1600 px. I use PSCS2 as the external editor and running it and Aperture is not an issue for me. Lastly I also use iPhoto - and the other family members use it also rather than Aperture.

  • Aperture with Black Macbook

    I'm using the Aperture trial with a new black Macbook, 2 gb RAM, OS 10.4.9. I've reviewed other posts re using Aperture with a Macbook, and have seen mixed results.
    I really like this app and want to purchase it, but certain simple operations that should be smooth are choppy. Eg., when the import screen opens after inserting a card into the card reader, or simply opening or closing stacks, it is slow and choppy.
    Is this everyone's experience using a Macbook with 2gb RAM? Am I missing something that could help (other than future improvements, possibly leopard, etc). I am using it with an Apple 20" cinema display. Thanks...

    Thanks... I'm really torn here. I absolutely want to buy aperture, but it is painfully slow at times. I checked it out at the local apple store today, and on both an imac and macbook pro it worked fine. But on the Macbook, it's frequently slow and not smooth.
    I think at least some of this would be easy to fix. For example, that import screen that opens in an animated fashion looks great- IF the hardware is sufficient. On the macbook it just goes way too slow. There should be at least an option to disable those "candy" graphics that require the better video card.
    I just downloaded Lightroom to look at. Frankly, I wasn't even going to, as I know aperture will integrate well with what I do. Perhaps Apple will improve those speed issues for those of us who are "serious amateurs" and use the macbook with its limited graphic capability....

  • Itunes will not sync photos from aperture with iphone

    I cannot sync images in my Aperture Library with my iPhone 5.  I used to be able to do it, but now, no matter what I ask it to sync, the sync quits when it gets to importing the photos I've selected

    Same issue with iMac to iPhone 6 and iPad Air 2. Both with iOS 8.1.

  • I have a problem with Imac mid 2010 graphics card (ATI Radeon 5670 512MB)

    I have a problem with Imac mid 2010 graphics card (ATI Radeon 5670 512MB). When I play video formats like xvid, mkv, avi iMac freezes and emits horrible sound,in service said the problem is not overheating. Not a problem with memory or hard disk because I placed second correct parts.The same problem is with OSX 10.6.8 and 10.8.4 and other players.Apple hardware test found no problem and tech tool pro found no fault.
    After five days of testing in the service they can not  found fault and it was decided to change the graphics card.
    New graphics have been tested for two days but it is not reproduced divx ... but their test software which did not find any fault on the old graphics...
    Do I have the right to complain if repair does not fix the problem because I use non apple softwere and video formats.

    You could look at the System Profile for the info it presents for the card.  But why wouldn't you think it's not up to date if you have the latest install (according to your sig above)?
    What program are you trying to run?  Is there anything in the system log? 
    I think it's the program that's having the problem and not anything with your video software.

  • I have two Apple IDs - one associated with iPad and iPhone and the other associated with iMac and MacAir. I am going to lose the former e-mail address imminently and would like to associate all devices with just one ID. How do I do this? Thanks

    I have two Apple IDs - one associated with iPad and iPhone and the other associated with iMac and MacAir. I am going to lose the former e-mail address imminently and would like to associate all devices with just one ID. How do I do this? Thanks

    Thanks - I guess it is like there were two of me!
    I bought the iPhone first and it seemed natural to link it to the (work) e-mail address which was in constant use. The iMac for home use came next and it seemed natural to use my home e-mail address, particularly as I knew by then that I would lose the work address after my imminent retirement. The same logic went for the recent puchase of the MacAir. I am not sure what happened with the iPad (also a recent purchase) - iTunes seemed to puch me towards the same ID as the iPhone.
    It is not a huge problem - just makes my persona look schizoid! Otherwise very happy with everything Apple.

  • I am new with iMac and I am trying to copy some file from my external HDD but it does not let me also I can't delete anything from this HDD using the finder. Can somebody help me , please?

    I am new with iMac and I am trying to copy some file from my external HDD that a used with my PC but it does not let me also I can't delete anything from this HDD using the finder. Can somebody help me , please?

    No, unfortunately, when you format a drive, it will erase all the contents. So you will need to find a temporary "storage" place to put the stuff using a PC so you have access to it. Then reformat using Disk Utility (Applications > Utilities). If only using with mac, format Mac OS Extended (Journaled) and use GUID Partition scheme under Partitions/Options. After formatting, you can drag the files back.

  • IPad 1 iCal not syncing with iMac (2009). Is there a fix?

    iPad 1 iCal (iOS 5.1.1) not syncing with iMac (2009 Intel) running OS X 10.8.2.
    Is there a fix?

    iPad 1 iCal (iOS 5.1.1) not syncing with iMac (2009 Intel) running OS X 10.8.2.
    Is there a fix?

  • I have an older iMac 5,1 and the disc drive no longer works. I was hoping that I could the Apple USB super drive as a replacement, but the info on the super drive page says compatible with iMac 2012 or later. Does anyone know why it would not work for me?

    I have an older iMac 5,1 and the disc drive no longer works. I was hoping that I could the Apple USB super drive as a replacement, but the info on the super drive page says compatible with iMac 2012 or later. Does anyone know why it would not work for me?

    A reply to similar question (Q & As , in product page Apple Store) says:
    "...dissable the internal reader hardware from devices setup. Then plug the external usb superdrive and that's it."  Answered by Enrique T from Lima Oct  25 2013.
    If you can locate an external Apple USB 'Air" superdrive for earlier model MacBook Air, that should work. The newer one for the Air is the same as for iMac, now.
    You may be able to use other brands of external USB optical drive with your older intel-based iMac, as some of them function capably. A few should also be able to see system discs or other bootable utilities on DVD.
    Hopefully this helps.
    Good luck & happy computing!

  • How to make my HP 5150 to print in color with iMac with 10.9 OS

    How to make my HP 5150 to print in color with iMac with 10.9 OS

    Read the user manual that came w/the printer and/or contact HP Support. 

  • I want to purchase iMac i7 and want to know if my pc based LG dvd player (usb) is compatible ? also my external Hard Drive (usb) is it compatible with iMac?

    wiil my PC extermnal dvd player and external hard drive be compatible with iMac ore do I have to by all new stuff?
    Can data be recovered from Hard drive and transfered to new iMac simply?
    Thank you for your time and consioderation,
    depending on this answer will decide if i change over to iMac or not
    Pierre

    All USB drives should be compatible hardware-wise. If the drive is formatted NTFS, then you can copy from it, but not write to it. If it is formatted FAT or exFAT, then you can both read and write.

  • Is it possible to add a second monitor via mac mini with iMac

    Hi
    is it possible to add a second monitor via mac mini with iMac
    or is there another solution?
    all i want to know is if i can run a second monitor or link a mac mini for more speed like i heard you can with the G5 Towers.

    The iMac will allow you to connect a second monitor but that monitor will show the same thing as the iMac's built-in screen.
    You can network a Mac mini and iMac via Ethernet or Firewire.
    Software load sharing like Xgrid can allow you to share work between the Macs.

  • I have updated to OS X 10.9 and now can't open Aperture, message reads You can't use this version of the application "Aperture" with this version of OS X. You have "Aperture" 3.2.3... all i need to know is how to get Aperture to work again..help !

    I have just updated to OS X 10.9 and now find that I can't open Aperture to access photos etc, message reads : You can't use this version of the application "Aperture" with this version of OS X. You have "Aperture" 3.2.3... whichj is not a lot of help, i have limited technical ability and all i need to know is how to get Aperture to work again...help !

    Software Update?

Maybe you are looking for

  • History Report of All the Completed Workflow

    We have a requirement of generating the history report of all completed workflows in a month. Where is the History data stored for all the workdflows. Is it in the Database tables or just in Workflow reports? How can this be extracted for above requi

  • Currency Field in Smart Form

    Hi, How to Display Currency Field in SmartForm  and how to declare

  • Loading an external CSS stylesheet

    I am new to Flash and trying to get an external CSS stylesheet to work correctly. I loaded the following sample code from the Adobe help files but the html text does not format correctly? If I add a StyleSheet object , then it will format just fine.

  • Proxy to JDBC a small issue

    Hi friends, I had a scnario where i am using proxy to JDBC this is sync scnario. when i am triggring the proxy with help of a report. If the data is present every thing is working fine.. in one case if data is not there in the sender side . mean payl

  • Audio books show every chapter

    Im having real trouble with my audio books, they show up fine in Itunes but when I go to audiobooks in my 160Gb Classic it shows every chapter of every book on the main screen, not just the one tile for each book (a nightmare to scroll thought every