APEX documentation bug: Application Builder User's Guide

Oracle® Application Express Application Builder User's Guide Release 4.0, chapter 12
>
Viewing Debug Deports
>
Should read "Viewing Debug Reports".

Thank you for noting this. I've passed the information along to the Application Express writers.

Similar Messages

  • DOC BUG: Oracle Application Express Application Builder User's Guide 4.1

    Oracle® Application Express Application Builder User's Guide
    Release 4.1
    Part Number E21674-03
    +§ HTML Header and Body Attribute+, Table 8-4 has:
    >
    Attribute: Page HTML Body Attribute
    Description: Enter text or HTML you want to appear before the page template footer.
    >
    This is the description for the Footer Text property, correctly described in Table 8-5. Table 8-4 should have something like:
    >
    Attribute: Page HTML Body Attribute
    Description: Enter HTML attributes to be specified for the page <tt>body</tt> element by replacing the <tt>#ONLOAD#</tt> substitution string in the page template.

    Anthony
    Thanks for picking that up.
    If you hadn't already noticed it, could I bring the +{thread:id=2285521}+ thread to your attention? I've confirmed that finding and would appreciate an explanation.

  • APEX Documentation Bug: APEX_UTIL.CLEAR_PAGE_CACHE

    For APEX Team (documentation)..
    APEX_UTIL.CLEAR_PAGE_CACHE says the parameter is p_page when it should be p_page_id.
    Martin

    Martin - Thanks.
    Scott

  • Are there any advanced user manual for Application Builder?

    Hi,
    I want to find Application Builder user manual that can teach me how to set the Install Settings. For example, I want to know what libraries will be included in the installer if I enable Serial Port Support and Port I/O Support. What's the function of Enable ActiveX server in Application Settings? The Application Builder user guide I found which is a 8 pages installation guide with release note. I hope some NI engineers can answer this question. Thanks.
    Best regards
    Bill

    For information about specific options in the Application Builder, click the Help button in the Build Application or Shared Library dialog box. In the Advanced Installer Settings dialog box, you also can click the Help button to display a topic with information about each option in the dialog box. Here are the descriptions of the two support options you mentioned:
    Serial Port Support -- Installs the serial portion of NI-VISA needed for applications that access serial instruments or serial port.
    Port I/O Support -- Installs the necessary support files for accessing parallel ports and for using the In Port and Out Port VIs.
    The description of the "Enable ActiveX server" checkbox is: "Enables the ActiveX server for the application so it c
    an respond to requests from ActiveX clients."
    These descriptions also have links to more information about the objects mentioned, such as the In Port and Out Port VIs and the ActiveX server.
    If this information is insufficient, please email [email protected] with your feedback so we can improve the help topics.
    Thank you,
    Kelly Holmes
    LabVIEW Documentation
    Kelly H
    LabVIEW Documentation
    National Instruments

  • Display Bug in LV 8.20 Application Builder

    There seems to be a minor bug in the displaying of the "VI Settings" in the application builder for LabVIEW 8.20.
    The problem is in an executable build spec, in the "Source File Settings" category.
    Select a sub VI in the tree, then uncheck the select box for the "Remove Panel" property. Now select any other VI in the tree, then go back to the one you unchecked the "Remove Panel" box. You should see that the box is now checked.
    If you don't do anything else and just select "OK, then go back into the build spec, you'll see that the property was correctly saved as unchecked. So it looks like it's just a display problem.
    I've made sure the VI I try this with does not use any property nodes and it is not marked as a dynamic VI. I can reproduce this on two machines running Windows XP Pro SP2 and LabVIEW 8.20.
    Ed
    Ed Dickens - Certified LabVIEW Architect - DISTek Integration, Inc. - NI Certified Alliance Partner
    Using the Abort button to stop your VI is like using a tree to stop your car. It works, but there may be consequences.

    In addition to Ed's
    comment, I would like to say that this unexpected behaviour is not
    always appearing. I have just seen following while editing this text :
    I have unchecked the Remove Panel box for all the UI VIs (all are
    located in the same directory). When scrolling through the different UI
    VIs in the Soure File Settings, the box was unchecked for all the VIs.
    Without closing the Source File Settings window, I switched to
    Developer Zone and switched back to the Source File Settings. For some
    UI VIs, the Remove Panel box was checked. I closed the window and
    opened it again, the box was unchecked again for all the UI VIs.
    But I have also encountered the case that when scrolling through the
    VIs to try to uncheck this setting for all of them, it suddenly appears
    checked again for a VI for which it was unchecked or unchecked for a
    before checked VI.
    You finally end with a very unclear situation and it may be that the
    Remove Panel is really checked for some VIs. At least, in some cases,
    the built EXE could not run because of missing front panels. I can't
    remember the exact error messages when running the EXE but they
    mentionned the name of the VI and something about missing ressources. I
    opened the .lvproj file and noticed that the "Remove Panel" property of
    these VIs was set to TRUE. After modifying these settings and
    rebuilding the EXE, it ran as expected.
    In development, I
    normally uncheck "Allow user to resize window" of the UI VIs because
    this setting can unfortunately not be changed when configuring the
    executable. In the "Source File Settings" I uncheck all options of "Use
    VI Setting" for these UI VIs and I only check "Auto-Center" (all VIs)
    and "Window is Modal" (some VIs).
    There is another problem with the application builder that I would like
    to mention. For (at least) following settings, the development settings
    of a VI will not be overwritten by the Source File Settings when
    building the executable :
    - Window has title bar
    - Show Menu bar
    - Show Toolbar
    - Show Scroll Bars
    This is also very annoying because you will need to change these
    settings in the development environement in order to get the expected
    appearance in the executable.
    LV8.2 English / WXP SP2

  • Application Builder Bug?

    I created a Calendar region in an application on htmldb.oracle.com (version 2.0.0.00.49), resulting in the creation of 3 region buttons: "Previous", "Today" and "Next", displayed on the page definition screen in this order but all with sequence number 30.
    In the Application Builder>Application>Page Definition>Edit Page Buttons screen, I made a change to the "Previous" button and then clicked the [>] button to move to the next button definition. This displayed the Edit Page Buttons screen for the "Today" button, but the [>] button was not available to move to the "Next" button. Similarly, in the "Next" button definition, the [<] button isn't available to move to the preceding "Today" button.
    Not a massive issue, but a bit awkward.

    Hi Oliver,
    comment attributes do normally only save up to 4000 characters. I will file a bug to restrict the textarea to 4000 chars.
    Regards
    Patrick
    My Blog: http://www.inside-oracle-apex.com
    APEX Plug-Ins: http://apex.oracle.com/plugins
    Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/patrickwolf

  • Remove Application Builder while creating  workspace in Apex

    hi,
    am using apex in 11g database,am creating a workspace but it contain application Builder,Sql Workshop and Utilities..
    My objective is i want only sql workshop no need Application builder and utilities while creating workspace in Oracle Apex.
    guide me
    regards
    apex

    Ummm... OK. But why? If you only need a SQL tool why not use SQLDeveloper or some other tool? Is it that you want a web browser interface?
    It would be very unwise to try to remove the applications you mention from the apex installation. This is probably possible but potentially very risky as the stability of your apex installation is concerned.
    You might want to try taking a CSS approach and hide all the stuff you don't want to see via a custom CSS file that you could put in your installation.
    Earl
    P.S. If you're going to ask how to do this then it's probably not something you're ready to do.

  • Documentation for Blueprint Application Builder

    Hi All
    Can anyone send me the documentation for blueprint application builder and CRM designer. That would be of great help.
    [email protected]
    thanks and regards
    Paul.

    Have a look at the weblog
    /people/vijaya.kumar/blog/2005/06/10/people-centric-user-interface-pcui--getting-started
    Hope this is what you are looking for.
    regards
    johnson zavier

  • Redirect Loop on ApEx Application Builder Timeout

    Hi Folks,
    We are experiencing an annoying issue on all of our Apex instances for those using the Application Builder. When a developer's session times out, the web server redirects in a loop. This is the output from the Apache log:
    xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx - - [19/Jun/2012:12:44:32 +0100] "GET /pls/apex/f?p=4000:1:8745082784701::NO:RP:FB_FLOW_ID,F4000_P1_FLOW:139,139 HTTP/1.1" 302 5 0
    xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx - - [19/Jun/2012:12:44:33 +0100] "GET /pls/apex/f?p=4550:1 HTTP/1.1" 302 5 0
    xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx - - [19/Jun/2012:12:44:33 +0100] "GET /pls/apex/f?p=4550:1:0::::: HTTP/1.1" 302 5 0
    xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx - - [19/Jun/2012:12:44:34 +0100] "GET /pls/apex/f?p=4550:1:0::::: HTTP/1.1" 302 5 1
    xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx - - [19/Jun/2012:12:44:34 +0100] "GET /pls/apex/f?p=4550:1:0::::: HTTP/1.1" 302 5 0
    xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx - - [19/Jun/2012:12:44:34 +0100] "GET /pls/apex/f?p=4550:1:0::::: HTTP/1.1" 302 5 0
    xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx - - [19/Jun/2012:12:44:35 +0100] "GET /pls/apex/f?p=4550:1:0::::: HTTP/1.1" 302 5 1
    xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx - - [19/Jun/2012:12:44:35 +0100] "GET /pls/apex/f?p=4550:1:0::::: HTTP/1.1" 302 5 0
    xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx - - [19/Jun/2012:12:44:35 +0100] "GET /pls/apex/f?p=4550:1:0::::: HTTP/1.1" 302 5 0
    xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx - - [19/Jun/2012:12:44:35 +0100] "GET /pls/apex/f?p=4550:1:0::::: HTTP/1.1" 302 5 0
    xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx - - [19/Jun/2012:12:44:36 +0100] "GET /pls/apex/f?p=4550:1:0::::: HTTP/1.1" 302 5 1
    xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx - - [19/Jun/2012:12:44:36 +0100] "GET /pls/apex/f?p=4550:1:0::::: HTTP/1.1" 302 5 0
    xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx - - [19/Jun/2012:12:44:36 +0100] "GET /pls/apex/f?p=4550:1:0::::: HTTP/1.1" 302 5 0
    xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx - - [19/Jun/2012:12:44:36 +0100] "GET /pls/apex/f?p=4550:1:0::::: HTTP/1.1" 302 5 0
    xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx - - [19/Jun/2012:12:44:36 +0100] "GET /pls/apex/f?p=4550:1:0::::: HTTP/1.1" 302 5 0
    xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx - - [19/Jun/2012:12:44:36 +0100] "GET /pls/apex/f?p=4550:1:0::::: HTTP/1.1" 302 5 0
    xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx - - [19/Jun/2012:12:44:37 +0100] "GET /pls/apex/f?p=4550:1:0::::: HTTP/1.1" 302 5 1
    xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx - - [19/Jun/2012:12:44:37 +0100] "GET /pls/apex/f?p=4550:1:0::::: HTTP/1.1" 302 5 0
    xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx - - [19/Jun/2012:12:44:37 +0100] "GET /pls/apex/f?p=4550:1:0::::: HTTP/1.1" 302 5 0
    xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx - - [19/Jun/2012:12:44:37 +0100] "GET /pls/apex/f?p=4550:1:0::::: HTTP/1.1" 302 5 0
    xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx - - [19/Jun/2012:12:44:37 +0100] "GET /pls/apex/f?p=4550:1:0::::: HTTP/1.1" 302 5 0
    xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx - - [19/Jun/2012:12:44:45 +0100] "GET /pls/apex HTTP/1.1" 302 5 0
    xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx - - [19/Jun/2012:12:44:45 +0100] "GET /pls/apex/apex HTTP/1.1" 302 5 0
    xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx - - [19/Jun/2012:12:44:45 +0100] "GET /pls/apex/f?p=4550:1:1610758051832601 HTTP/1.1" 200 11311 0
    Is there a workaround for this? I can't seem to find anyone else experiencing the same issue.
    Best Regards, and thanks in advance.
    Pete

    I tried with Turning Off Cookies Used to Populate the Login Form as mentioned at http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E23903_01/doc/doc.41/e21678/adm_mg_service_set.htm#sthref237.
    Instance administrators can control if a convenience cookie is sent to a user's computer whenever a developer or administrator logs in to a workspace from the Application Express Login page.
    If Set Workspace Cookie option is set to Yes, Oracle Application Express sends a persistent cookie that:
    combines the last used workspace name and user name
    has a lifetime of six months
    is read to populate the Application Express Workspace Login form (but not the Oracle Application Express Administration Services Login form)
    To turn off cookies used to populate the login form:
    Log in to Oracle Application Express Administration Services. See "Logging In To Oracle Application Express Administration Services".
    Click Manage Instance.
    Under Instance Settings, click Security.
    Locate the Security section.
    For Set Workspace Cookie, select No.
    Click Apply Changes.
    And it seems to have resolved the issue.
    Thanks,
    Mehabub
    Edited by: Mehabub Sheikh on Aug 24, 2012 3:20 AM

  • Problem with logging in to apex application builder listener

    I have problem with my settings and am posting this in hope that someone else out there had similar problem and solved it!
    I am trying to use reverseproxy to access to our db through apex listener.
    It's been all set-up and I can login to the application it self either through proxy or no proxy using the listener.
    But when I try to login to apex application builder I cannot do it through proxy(with no proxy, it works).
    It just refreshes the login page when I click login....
    I tried to upgrade the listener to the latest v1.1(using 1.0.2) but it causes my tomcat to crash...
    So solution i am looking for is how to make logging in work through proxy..
    In the firebug it is showing that below and few other request status as 302 moved temporariry
    http://myserver:8080/testsin/apex/wwv_flow.accept
    Where as with no proxy it is saying Found.....
    Any thoughts??
    Thanks
    Sin K

    Hello Sin K,
    so proxy and Tomcat are located on different machines as well? Is the proxy able to commuicate with the Tomcat on the configured internal ports and is the proxy able to lookup the hostname you configured for the Tomcat?
    For the connector, the proxyName and proxyPort should be the parameters the client uses to call APEX. So if your clients should call via http://proxyserver:8080/testsin/apex the settings would be
    proxyName=proxyserver
    proxyPort=8080Reason for this is that applications (e.g. the APEX Listener) generate there URL references with these parameters.
    But does your proxy actually serve on port 8080? And is that port accessible by clients? Do clients accept cookies from that server?
    In my case, there is only one 302 which redirects to http://host:port/apex/f?p=4500:1000:sessionid which is correct.
    If you look into your first post request in firebug, what's in the request header?
    -Udo

  • Bug? Application not appearing in Application builder

    Version 3.1.2.00.02
    I have an application 102 which is translated to japanese as application 103 in my workspace - training
    I have another application in a different database with application number 102 in workspace - develop.
    I export application 102 from develop and import it into training. I select Auto Assign New Application ID. This creates the application with ID 103!
    I was able to work and make changes and do everything on this new application. However, when I check in the application builder, I cannot not see this application. And when I try to run the application 102 in japanese (translated), then, it fails with an error.
    Though I cannot see the new application 103 in my builder, I can run the application by making changes in the URL and if I click on 'Edit Application' link, then, I am able to make changes and work on application 103.
    I realised that this is a corrupted version, and deleted my japanese translation of 102. This deleted my new application as well.
    Is this a bug ?

    Hi Naveen,
    It will be most probably because of Security not defined for this new application in the "Member Access profile". Please check.
    Thanks & Regards
    Arun Kumar S

  • Scrollbar bug in application builder

    I seem to have found a bug concerning the front panel scrollbars when creating an executable with application builder.
    My vi runs fine in Labview. It also runs fine as an executable with everything at defaults.  
    However, trying to remove the scrollbars from the front panel, I can build executables that hang up upon running. 
    Executable hangs up when:
    - setting the vi property 'windows appearance' to dialog.   (application builder set to use vi settings)
    - in application builder, sourcefile setting:  setting 'use scrollbars' to  "don't use vi settings" and value "not checked"
    What's really weird is that sometimes those troublesome executables do work.   The executables compiled with the 'dialog' option only seem to work once, and then not anymore.    While the one with the no-scrollbars option set in application builder seems to hang the first time, but work fine after that.   Except that it does show scrollbars....
    The executable does work without front panel scrollbars when setting the vi property 'windows appearance' to 'top level application' and application builder settings to 'use vi settings'.

    Hi Rebecca.   
    I'm using Labview 8.2  on Windows XP SP2 for developing.  The PC that the .exe should run on has the LV 8.2 runtime installed, also on Windows XP SP2.  
     I've attached two executables of my program:  'works'  and 'doesn't work' which were compiled with the scrollbar on and off.  Also included the source distribution.  The "Micro4 Advanced Multiple Injections LV82" is the main program.   (Hope I did the distribution right... it's the first time I'm using this project thing...)
    I've been testing a bit more myself...  I now noticed that both .exe's work correctly on my developement PC, but only the one works on the runtime PC...    
    Attachments:
    doesn't work.zip ‏220 KB
    My Source Distribution.zip ‏336 KB
    works-ok.zip ‏400 KB

  • Stand-alone application generates error with function 'Ramp Pattern' (bug in application builder?)

    Hello,
    in my program a main.vi links to a sub-VI via 'open VI reference' and 'invoke node'. In this sub-VI the function 'Ramp Pattern' is used. The program itself runs normally, but if I build a stand-alone application using application builder I get an error message 'error 1003 occurred ..'. I believe this error is directly related to the build specifications which are as follows: the main.vi is referenced in a main build specification, the sub-VI in its own specification where the target is a LLB.
    I appended an example-program that exhibits the error (when executing 'Application.exe' and pressing 'calculate ramp'). The error does not occur when disabling the 'ramp pattern' function and rebuilding the application.
    I would rate this to be a bug in the application builder and would appreciate any help on how to solve this problem. However, due to the structure of the whole program the sub-VI has to remain in its own LLB.
    Attachments:
    RampPattern.zip ‏198 KB

    There can be reasons why a VI might appear broken when loaded from an executable. For example, if you have different versions of the same VI or enum that differ in such a way as to break the calling VI, that can cause a broken arrow when loaded from the executable. If you have DLLs being called and the runtime engine can't find the DLL, that can cause a broken arrow that you might not see otherwise. Finally, there is a bug related to a VI appearing broken when its not.
    Mike...
    Certified Professional Instructor
    Certified LabVIEW Architect
    LabVIEW Champion
    "... after all, He's not a tame lion..."
    Be thinking ahead and mark your dance card for NI Week 2015 now: TS 6139 - Object Oriented First Steps

  • Text field with autocomplete: little bug in application builder

    Hi,
    I just noticed that the application builder complains when a text field with autocomplete is defined with a named LOV containing a single column value (Apex 4.0.2.00.06).
    I created the text-field with a dynamic LOV (please specify in the docs that autocomplete requires single column queries!), then I used the "Convert to named LOV" task link to convert it to a named LOV and it works perfectly, however as soon as you attempt to change some other attribute for the item, it will throw the following error:
    1 error has occurred
        Using a named list of values (LOV) is only supported for item types which require at least two LOV columns.As i said, the named single column LOV works just fine with the autocomplete, so the error message seems to be also misleading.
    Flavio
    http://oraclequirks.blogspot.com
    http://www.yocoya.com

    Hi Surya,
    the "Text Field with autocomplete" is really just an autocomplete widget and doesn't behave like a LOV. But we are planning to release an item type plug-in which solves both of your requirements.
    Regards
    Patrick
    My Blog: http://www.inside-oracle-apex.com
    APEX 4.0 Plug-Ins: http://apex.oracle.com/plugins

  • Application Builder Wizard Table Name drop down

    Hi Folks,
    I am running Apex 4.0 on 10g express DB.
    I am trying to build an application based on views using the wizard but the tabular form can pick up only tables but not sql query or views..any way to work around this?
    thanks,

    Hi "user2147613",
    As you have identified, only Tables can be selected in the Create Application wizard, for the creation of pages. However, our Create Page and Create Region wizards can be used to generate pages based on your views, in an existing application. You'll just need to initially create an application with at least one page ( e.g. a Blank Page ) via the Create Application wizard, and then edit the application to make use of the Create Page and Create Region wizards. The Create Application wizard exposes only a subset of the options that would be available via the other Create wizards, and this is due to the fact that the number of steps in this wizard are kept to a minimum, and therefore a number of assumptions are made. For example, only a table with a Primary Key defined can be selected for the creation of a page in this wizard. So if an option is not exposed in this wizard, then I would suggest reviewing the options available in our other Create wizards. You may find it useful to refer to Chapter 8 Adding Application Components of our User's Guide for further information: http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/E17556_01/doc/user.40/e15517/app_comp.htm#CHDCGHGE.
    I hope this helps.
    Regards,
    Hilary

Maybe you are looking for