Apogee Mini-Me Routing Issues

I have the Apogee Mini-Me audio interface with a ton of cables running everywhere (not to mention having to get behind the Apogee whenever changing inputs). I'm running Logic 8 on an iMac.
I'm short on _space and money_ and was wondering what the best "routing option" is without having to reach behind each time. I have 3 mics and 5 instrument inputs. I've been told that I can use my Mackie 1202 VLZ3 mixer as a router to send the main outs to the Apogee's 2 rear inputs ... In theory just panning the Mackie channel to the correct side to enter either of the Apogee's inputs.
Others say a patchbay is the answer, while others say if you spend less than 1K on a patchbay, it's a noisemaker.
I wanted to solicit some opinions as to what would be an acceptable routing solution for recording demos (one track at a time) ??
Thanks in advance to all -
The Reacher

I've been using logic 8 since the day it came out, but only this last 2 weeks have i started encountering a lot of crashes and the white noise blasts.
I'm running logic 8 (latest update) on a mac pro with snow leopard (latest update) with a pre sonus fire studio soundcard.
I had a suspicion that the white noise blast was happening since i put snow leopard on, as i had never ever had this before.
I find it very suspicious that in the last 2 weeks i have all of a sudden started to have a lot of problems with logic 8 like crashing and the white noise blasts.
I seriously won't be upgrading to logic 9 if what other people are saying is true.
I will try reinitalizing core audio and turning off journaling, and tell my external lacie drive not to go to sleep when not in use.
(I don't see how any of this would help though as i have never had to do any of this for the past 2 years).

Similar Messages

Routing Issue with 2 Nics on Windows Server 2008 R2

Good Day
My issue is I needed to set up port forwarding for a web server to communicate with our hotels management server to check availability.
Initially the server has a single Nic configured in the 172.26.1.0 /24 network , Its default gateway the Switch vlan interface 172.26.1.1
We have many vlans for all the systems in the hotel and the server also needs to communicate with 3 other servers on different subnets which it does just fine.
I now added an additional adsl line with a managed router which has an interface of 192.168.10.1 /24 , My servers second NIC has the IP address 192.168.10.2 with its gateway being the 192.168.10.1
This 192.168.10.0 network is in a L2 Vlan and the rest of the network does not know it exists. It was working fine then just stopped asfter i added a static route to the server , which i did with RRas... I did this as the server could not communicate with
just one of the servers..
If i disable the 172.26.1.0 NIC the port forwarding works but then obviously the rest of the network goes down.. I know its a routing issue but am lost
please help

Hello,
using multiple default gateways is not a good idea.
See details in http://support.microsoft.com/kb/159168/en-us
Best regards
Meinolf Weber
MVP, MCP, MCTS
Microsoft MVP - Directory Services
My Blog: http://blogs.msmvps.com/MWeber
Disclaimer: This posting is provided AS IS with no warranties or guarantees and confers no rights.
Twitter:

Routing issue- seeing same IPs for two hops

Hello All,
I'm seeing two same IPs in the traceroute output. Is that due to routing issue that nexhop is as the same device for the first time?
Log:
6 10.30.102.26 61.060 ms 10.30.100.142 61.266 ms 10.30.102.26 61.071 ms
7 10.30.102.26 61.139 ms 61.211 ms 10.61.191.2 60.948 ms
Can you guys help me to fix the issue??
Regards,
Thiyagu

Are you load balancing anywhere?
6 10.30.102.26 61.060 ms
   10.30.100.142 61.266 ms
   10.30.102.26 61.071 ms
7 10.30.102.26 61.139 ms 61.211 ms
   10.61.191.2 60.948 ms
HTH,
John
*** Please rate all useful posts ***

Routing Issue with Telia

I think verizon has a routing issue with Telia.

thought I would share this, Telia has admited an issue on their network
Twitter / Telia_service: @Ungvall routing problem? This ...
https://twitter.com/Telia_service/status/179661595276881921
Cached
Similar
Share
View shared post
BTW Apparently @Telia_service had routing problems on both the latest iOS and ... DNS problem and we are working with Akamai for a sollution to this problem

Routing Issue with 3550

I am having a routing issue with a 3550 switch. I have 5 vlans and I need one of the vlans to access a different router based on destination IP rather than our edge router. I have entered a static route on the 3550 that points to the secondary router whenever a certain network is tried to be accessed. My problem is I can't seem to get the traffic to flow correctly. When I trace route an address on the Internet the path shows as expected, the 3550 then my firewall then my edge router. When I trace an address that is on the other side of the secondary router I get the 3550 as the first hop, then nothing. I can ping the address so I know the path is up. What could be the issue? Thanks in advance.

Hello,
in addition to Mahmood´s post, what do you have defined as the next hop for the default route to the secondary router ? If you use an interface on the 3550 as the next hop, make sure that whatever is connected is in the same subnet, otherwise use the IP address of the next hop. So, let´s say your remote network is 192.168.1.0, and the secondary router is connected to FastEthernet0/1, your default route should look like this if the secondary router is in the same subnet (in this example, the IP address of the secondary router would be 172.16.1.2):
interface FastEthernet0/1
no switchport
ip address 172.16.1.1 255.255.255.252
ip route 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255 FastEthernet0/0
Otherwise, try:
ip route 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255 172.16.1.2
where 172.16.1.2 would be the address of the secondary router.
Does that make sense ?
Regards,
GNT

No airtunes with pppoE due to routing issues?

I just switched to an optical fiber to the home internet connection (which is getting pretty popular here in Japan). Needless to say, the network is very fast, however, I can no longer use airtunes via my airport express network. The airport express stations (both of them) no longer show up in iTunes. My guess is that this is due to a routing issue and the same problem must have been encountered by others before and hopefully solved. The new internet connection uses pppoE to make a connection to the internet service provider. This gives me an internet address of the form 125.197.xx.yy. I still have my airport express set to get an address via dhcp (which the new optical fiber hub provides) and is of the typical private network form 192.168.1.4. When I am connected by pppoE to the internet, my iTunes cannot see my airport express due to routing issues I assume. Is there an elegant solution to this -- can I use my airtunes and the internet at the same time? Would modifying the internet routing help here (I have used this before when I have had multiple interfaces going (e.g. one in a secure local lan and the other supporting an internet connection via ssh to the outside world). Any advise would be much appreciated. I haven't tried asking my airport express to log in via pppoE -- is this the only solution?

Well as I have for my last several posts -- I solved the problem myself. I am pretty sure that the root cause was a routing problem (pretty obvious in fact). By have the airport express base station connect via pppoE itself (I have a remote relay airport express as well) and switching to NAT and DHCP distribution of addresses via the airport express, I can both see my airtunes as well as my ethernet connection. It is a non-ideal solution as I have a fixed IP which would have been convenient to log in from outside to, but I guess I can live with that.

Audio tracks playing different audio tracks - routing issue?

I'm having trouble with some routing issues I believe. Here's the deal:
Some audio tracks are playing different audio tracks, when that region is not even in it. For instance:
Track #2 is Soloed. Output is Output 1-2. I hear the audio file that is in Track #1, which is NOT Soloed and I shouldn't even hear. I don't hear anything from Track #2. The only way I can hear Track #2 is by playing it from the audio bin, which obviously isn't going to work out right.
If I drag the audio region of Track #2 to a brand new audio track, I still don't hear anything. Is it possible this audio file(s) got corrupted somehow?
Please help!

Chris Joye wrote:
I'm having trouble with some routing issues I believe. Here's the deal:
Some audio tracks are playing different audio tracks, when that region is not even in it. For instance:
Track #2 is Soloed. Output is Output 1-2. I hear the audio file that is in Track #1, which is NOT Soloed and I shouldn't even hear. I don't hear anything from Track #2. The only way I can hear Track #2 is by playing it from the audio bin, which obviously isn't going to work out right.
If I drag the audio region of Track #2 to a brand new audio track, I still don't hear anything. Is it possible this audio file(s) got corrupted somehow?
Please help!
Check the parameters, in the left side of the arrange page window.
To me, it sounds as if you have a bunch of arrange tracks, which are all playing back through audio track #1.
Cheers

Mac Mini vs router + server

Hi,
I'm doing some research about the benefits or the Mac Mini with server.
What im aiming for is buying a Mac mini, install OS X Server on it. Connect it directly to the modem and use the Mac mini as a wifi router with built in server options. Integrate it with a firewall and VPN with my devices.
Id like to have some opinion from the hardcore apple users.
Is the wireless card strong enough to compete with a router?
Would the security a router provides be stronger and safer than a server with additional firewall and antivirus software?
Is it possible to tunnel my VPN connection from my iDevices from outside the local network (like 4LTE, 3G, Wifi at a friends house) to my VPN server at home, continued by tunneling my VPN from the server at home (Mac Mini) to my paid VPN Server (company)
Would it be possible to connect with my iDevices to my Mac Mini and use it as a regular computer, even outside of the home network?
I assume that I can externally expand the storage capacity by plugging in an external HDD through USB or Thunderbolt, is this correct?
Can I setup Time Machine on the server to save backups from my MacBooks?
I want to setup my own cloud so I have all my photos, documents and videos in one place, compared to limited storage (unless paid) on Cloud companies. Is it possible to setup my iDevices so they store new pictures and videos in my cloud at home, instead of the iCloud Dive space
What I would like to accomplish with this is creating a single device that provides several purposes related with my iDevices, in and outside it's network.
Including:
Serve as a Wifi router to provide the SSID
VPN service (within and from outside the SSID)
Cloud Storage available to my iDevices (within and from outside the SSID)
Time Machine
Is all of this realistic? What are the downsides of setting it up like this, vs a router with a server connected to it.
Thanks in advance
Mark

I'll bite.
I will preface this by saying that I am not a fan of OS X as a NAT device. Apple removed all easy configuration back with the release of 10.7. While it still can be done, you really must have a passion for tinkering to make it work. Now, there is IceFloor. If you are considering using the Mac as the NAT device, then IceFloor can ease the pain of configuration. That being said, I still believe that it is best to isolate and separate your devices into distinct roles. A firewall is designed to be a firewall. It does that job and does it solely well. OS X Server is a general purpose server. It is capable of many things but it does not necessarily excel at being a NAT appliance. Also, firewalls are generally easier to setup and configure than OS X Server when considering NAT roles and policies.
All that being said, OS X Server is a capable and very affordable solution that works exceptionally well for all Apple environments.
Before continuing, I should point out that you should investigate your residential ISP's policies regarding hosting services. If you are in the US, there are many ISPs that block http and smtp on residential services. Some block additional ports. Plus, if you have a dynamic service then you likely should be looking at dynamic DNS to ensure that you can always reach your server. If you have a dynamic service, this is all the more reason to put OS X Server behind a firewall appliance. OS X, especially for services like Open Directory, Profile Manager, and others, really only work properly when the server has a fixed IP address. If this is not possible on primary route connection, you will struggle with certain services. Placing the device on a LAN and allowing a firewall to handle everything else is a much better solution.
1: Is the wireless card strong enough to compete with a router?
Get a $99 airport express. You will be happier.
2: Would the security a router provides be stronger and safer than a server with additional firewall and antivirus software?
This is arguing between 6 in one hand and a half dozen in the other. Two identically configured solutions result in the same level of security. Or lack thereof. The nice part about a firewall is that it assumes everything is bad unless you explicitly allow it. With OS X, it generally thinks everything is good unless you explicitly deny it. (this is a gross simplification of the situation so you weigh your options) A firewall appliance will likely provide additional services that are easy to configure and also provide more logging and reporting regarding what is happening. Again, I am partial to the firewall.
3: Is it possible to tunnel my VPN connection from my iDevices from outside the local network (like 4LTE, 3G, Wifi at a friends house) to my VPN server at home, continued by tunneling my VPN from the server at home (Mac Mini) to my paid VPN Server (company)
So, you want to be out of your house, create a VPN into your home network, and then be able to traverse to your office? Why not connect direct to the office? How does routing through your home benefit the situation? Regardless, anything is possible. But, the tunnel from your home to the office would need to be built and persistent. Thus, you can remote into your home network. Let's say your home network is 10.0.20.0/24 and your office is 172.16.0.1/24. Your home would build a tunnel to the office. Then the VPN service would advertise the 172.16.0.1/24 route (as well as the 10.0.20.0/24 network) to the client devices, allowing them to access resources on both networks. Then you can request resources on your company network because the route will be provided by the VPN connection.
4: Would it be possible to connect with my iDevices to my Mac Mini and use it as a regular computer, even outside of the home network?
This is another one of my dislikes. Everything has a role and a purpose. Your server is a server, not a workstations. Workstations get rebooted, generally are updated more frequently, run various software and perform varied tasks. Servers have a narrower purpose. I am not a fan of using a server as a workstation. This gets particularly muddy of you are doing file services or need services than must loop back to the server itself. Can you use the server as a workstation? Sure, what is stopping you. Should you? In my opinion, no. Let a Firewall be a firewall. Let a server be a server. Let a workstation be a workstation. Together, they will live in harmony.
5: I assume that I can externally expand the storage capacity by plugging in an external HDD through USB or Thunderbolt, is this correct?
Yes. Thunderbolt is fast. USB 3 is not terrible. Stay away from Firewire at this point. Get something that supports RAID. Remember, RAID is not backup. All it does is provide drive level redundancy.
6: Can I setup Time Machine on the server to save backups from my MacBooks?
Yes. OS X Server provides Time Machine server. Figure out what you want to backup (data only or the whole drive) and then calculate a capacity requirement. While not as critical as in the past, I still prefer isolating Time Machine backup volumes. I tend not to storage any other data there.
7: I want to setup my own cloud so I have all my photos, documents and videos in one place, compared to limited storage (unless paid) on Cloud companies. Is it possible to setup my iDevices so they store new pictures and videos in my cloud at home, instead of the iCloud Dive space
Hmm. So, ah. No. Yes. Well not really. Not easy like iCloud. That is integrated and generally "just works." There is nothing stopping you from manually storing all your content in this location and then sharing it out. But there is no way to redirect an image from your phone to magically appear on your own server. Unless you are using photo stream and you have iPhoto set up on the server. But then we get back to the workstation vs server argument I just had with myself and around I go in a circle. You can create your own storage. But there is effort here. You have WebDAV, Portfolio/Cumulus, and other services and solutions.
So to wrap up...
Serve as a Wifi router to provide the SSID
VPN service (within and from outside the SSID)
Cloud Storage available to my iDevices (within and from outside the SSID)
Time Machine
Using the internal WiFi will only frustrate you. Get an access point and you will get better coverage, better control, and more features. OS X supports two VPN types. PPTP and L2TP. Both will work through a NAT. Both are natively supported on OS X and iOS. Building your own Cloud is the most daunting and vague area. And Time Machine is cake.
Is all of this realistic? What are the downsides of setting it up like this, vs a router with a server connected to it.
Is building a server sitting on a LAN with a firewall realistic? It is done everyday and nearly every network is doing the same thing. All of the above is my take on the topic but I focus on businesses and organizations. These types of setups get a firewall. Then the server is protected behind an umbrella of protection. If you go the mini alone route, you have lower cost by higher difficulty. If you get the individual pieces then you have higher cost but simpler setup and management.
Hope this helps. Once again, too much information. Had a moment of quiet.
Reid
Apple Consultants Network
Author "Yosemite Server – Foundation Services" :: Exclusively available in Apple's iBooks Store
Author "Mavericks Server – Foundation Services" :: Exclusively available in Apple's iBooks Store
Author "Mavericks Server – Control and Collaboration" :: Exclusively available in Apple's iBooks Store

IB Routing issue. Unable to find routing to the corresponding incoming msg

Hi All,
We are facing a Routing issue. The flow of message across the DB is given below.
1) Message will be triggered from 3rd party application to PeopleSoft portal with Service Operation A
2) From portal one more service operation B will be invoked to communicate with CRM
Both the service operations are synchronous. I have tested the Service operation in CRM and I am able to get the results. But in Portal if I test, I am getting the error like
+"Unable to find routing corresponding to the incoming request message"+
I have checked the routing alias name between Portal and CRM data bases and Its same.
could you please give us a clue to debug this further?
Thanks,
Hari.A

You should check which permission list the service operation is attached to, and check if the user has been granted to, Something like the following from the backend :
SELECT   distinct c.roleuser
FROM     psclassdefn a, psroleclass b, psroleuser c
WHERE    a.classid = b.classid
AND      b.rolename = c.rolename
AND      a.classid = '<permission_list>' If nothing is returned for your user, then you could created a new role and give it to the user.
Also, since you are on Peopletools 8.52, all this configuration settings can be done through Integration Network WorkCenter. I wrote articles about that (and you can find something about permission list for a given service operation as well) :
http://gasparotto.blogspot.nl/2012/11/peopletools-852-integration-network.html
Nicolas.

NO HELP WITH ROUTING ISSUES FROM VERIZON

Spend 2 hours with technical support to no avail. Have routing issues where I can’t get from my FIOS residential account to remote web site abroad. Trace route fails at so-0-0-0.XT1.AMS2.ALTER.NET [146.188.14.209]. FIOS technical support is incapable of doing any troubleshooting beyond basic customer premises equipment, refusing to escalate the case to network engineering team. I was basically told by FIOS tech support supervisor {edited for privacy} that this is not Verizon’s problem and no help will be provided. What is even more frustrating that Verizon agents are not capable of receiving emails from customers with details such as trace route.
Is there anyone at Verizon monitoring this and able to help? Just in case, ticket number that I have with Verizon is {edited for privacy}
Here is trace route details.
tracert 212.44.136.226
Tracing route to brserv.bridgetour.ru [212.44.136.226]
over a maximum of 30 hops:
1     1 ms    <1 ms     1 ms Wireless_Broadband_Router.home [192.168.1.1]
2    12 ms     9 ms     9 ms L100.BSTNMA-VFTTP-71.verizon-gni.net [98.118.28
1]
3    16 ms    19 ms    19 ms G0-6-4-1.BSTNMA-LCR-21.verizon-gni.net [130.81.
75.132]
4    45 ms    15 ms     8 ms ae3-0.BOS-BB-RTR1.verizon-gni.net [130.81.151.6
5    19 ms    19 ms    19 ms 0.xe-3-2-0.IL1.NYC9.ALTER.NET [152.63.26.81]
6    21 ms    19 ms    19 ms 0.ge-1-2-0.IL1.NYC12.ALTER.NET [152.63.26.86]
7   107 ms   108 ms   107 ms so-0-0-0.XT1.AMS2.ALTER.NET [146.188.14.209]
8     *        *        *     Request timed out.
9     *        *        *     Request timed out.
10     *        *        *     Request timed out.
11     *        *        *     Request timed out.
12     *        *        *     Request timed out.
13     *        *        *     Request timed out.

BT help aren't always that helpful, but BT engineers claim that it is a BT sales issue and nothing to do with them seems a bit extreme.
Are you sure your daily speed is 8Mbits, not 8Mbytes? How are you measuring this? Is it the number coming from the BT speedtest?
If it really is 8Mb, then I think it's worth checking with the mods;  at: http://bt.custhelp.com/app/contact_email/c/4951 . But be aware they take 3 working days to reply: sometimes more if busy.

HELP! Mac Mini Server Journaling issue during reinstall

H E L P !
Mac Mini Server Journaling issue...
Hi there,
I have taken on a nearly new Mac Mini Server running Snow Leopard.
It has a RAID set up already.
When I try to reinstall the OS from the original disk the installation willl not let me select the drive as it says it is not journaled.
I have then opened Disk Utility and selected the main HD (there is one HD plus 2 Raid slices listed).
From this point on there are no options available:
The only 2 tabs above the right hand window are 'First Aid' and 'RAID'.
First Aid shows all 4 options greyed out.
Selecting the main HD and then going to File>Enable Journaling will not work as 'Enable Journaling' is greyed out.
Deleting the RAID does not work either, as the HD (mirrored RAID set) and both RAID sclices have the padlock icon next to them.
Can anyone help?
I really need to reinstall the OS and set the machine up with a TimeMachine Capsule asap!
Many thanks,
Haberdashery

Sorted!
All is good now : )

Verizon/Time Warner Routing Issue

I've been having trouble logging on to my email through Outlook, IPad, or IPhone. The service provider is Time Warner. Apparently the problem is a routing issue between Time Warner and Verizon and they've had the routing issues for over 2 months and have still not resolved the problem. Since no one at Verizon seems to know anything about this, does anyone have any information as to when the issue will be resolved?

I can sign in using webmail and see my email. But I can't use Outlook, my IPad or IPhone utilities to see my email using TW as a provider. If I'm anywhere else, using any other provider, I can use Outlook, my IPad and IPhone without any problems.
When I called TW, they told me the problem was a routing issue that both TW and Verizon were working on and had been working on for at least 2 months, but no solution yet. They were surprised that no one at Verizon knew this.
Since everything worked fine until a week ago and nothing changed in my settings and Verizon verified that everything was set up correctly, I'm satisfied that this is the issue. My concern is that not one Verizon representative has acknowledged that there is a routing problem between TW and Verizon; especially if the problem has existed well over 2 months. You would think that an issue like this should be shared among all their troubleshooting team.

Possible internet routing issues driving me crazy!

I've somehow hit a problem accessing a particular favourite website and it seems I may have a routing issue.
I've spoken with a friend who is fairly network savvy and he's suggested I raise a case \ complaint with BT. I thought I'd use this forum to test if I'm missing something I could be doing to fix it before logging a problem with BT Helpdesk!
I've a BT Homehub 2 (Current firmware   4.7.5.1.83.3.5 (Type B) and I can access pretty much all websites I care to look at without any issue at all, however the site I read most days is now no longer viewable on any of my 2 PC's nor my iPhone. When I try to access it I get no error messages at all just a blank white page.
Doesn't matter if I try using IE or Firefox or Chrome browers it's the same result - I just see a blank white page.
The site in question www.celticquicknews.co.uk (or www.celticquicknews.com) and is definitely available, as I can access it when using a site such as http://www.free-internet-organization.tk/ on both my PC's and iphone so I know the web site is up and running and available for browsing but since Thursday lunchtime I've had no joy in being to access that particular site directly wihout resorting to using another middleman site to let me view it.
I have tweeted the guy who hosts the www.celticquicknews.co.uk site and he's said his site is fine but has numerous similar queries around BTINTERNET folks having the same issue as I'm reporting.
I run McAfee Internet Security and having disabled the various firewall \secure browsing functions no improvement still no joy.
I did successfully somehow connect directy to the illusive web site this morning (Sunday 1st May) on my iphone at around 10am, but by the time I boiled the kettle to have a coffeee and sit and read the site it became inaccessable again on my iphone and both my PC's! So what's going on?
www.celticquicknews.co.uk [217.174.253.143]
www.celticquicknews.com [217.174.253.143]
Homehub TCP\IP info is as below which I suspect is of value to the more techincal on the forum:
Broadband network IP address   109.152.154.29
Default gateway   217.32.142.102
Primary DNS   194.72.0.114
Secondary DNS   62.6.40.162
ADSL line status
Connection Information
Line state   Connected
Connection time   0 days, 01:11:16
Downstream   15,978 Kbps
Upstream   1,144 Kbps
ADSL Settings
VPI/VCI   0/38
Type   PPPoA
Modulation   G.992.5 Annex A
Latency type   Interleaved
Noise margin (Down/Up)   5.2 dB / 6.0 dB
Line attenuation (Down/Up)   31.0 dB / 13.8 dB
Output power (Down/Up)   23.6 dBm / 1.7 dBm
C:\>tracert -d 217.174.253.143
Tracing route to 217.174.253.143 over a maximum of 30 hops
1    <1 ms    <1 ms    <1 ms 192.168.1.254
2    15 ms    15 ms    15 ms 217.32.142.102
3    18 ms    17 ms    16 ms 217.32.142.142
4    22 ms    22 ms    21 ms 213.120.163.26
5    22 ms    20 ms    21 ms 217.32.27.30
6    21 ms    21 ms    21 ms 217.32.27.178
7    22 ms    21 ms    21 ms 109.159.250.78
8    33 ms    35 ms    35 ms 109.159.250.13
9    28 ms    28 ms    29 ms 62.172.102.1
10    29 ms    28 ms    28 ms 195.66.224.98
11    33 ms    34 ms    33 ms 88.208.255.61
12    38 ms    32 ms    33 ms 88.208.255.102
13     *        *        *     Request timed out.
14     *        *        *     Request timed out.
15     *        *        *     Request timed out.
16     *        *        *     Request timed out.
17     *        *        *     Request timed out.
18     *        *        *     Request timed out.
19     *        *        *     Request timed out.
20     *        *        *     Request timed out.
21     *        *        *     Request timed out.
22     *        *        *     Request timed out.
23     *        *        *     Request timed out.
24     *        *        *     Request timed out.
25     *        *        *     Request timed out.
26     *        *        *     Request timed out.
27     *        *        *     Request timed out.
28     *        *        *     Request timed out.
29     *        *        *     Request timed out.
30     *        *        *     Request timed out.
Trace complete.
C:\>
I've reset my HH several times over the weekend and am baffled as to how I can somehow have 1 site excluded from my browsing options for no obvious reason other than a suspected internet routing issue.
My iPhone is on ORANGE and when disabling the wireless connection it too is unable to view the site in question so it's a real pain!
Not sure where to go to progress this so any help \ guidance is very much appreciated.......
Solved!
Go to Solution.

Appreciate the help....been out for most of the day and checked in to see if any additional posts.
I tried pinging the site and it does seem to resolve OK and also tried accessing site via IP but same issue - blank white page.
>ping www.celticquicknews.co.uk
Pinging www.celticquicknews.co.uk [217.174.253.143] with 32 bytes of data:
Request timed out.
Request timed out.
Request timed out.
Request timed out.
Then tried the telnet command "telnet 217.174.253.143 80" and I do not get any errors and as suggested the command prompt goes blank but no matter what I type I get no errors or response from server 217.174.253.143.
My IP address has changed from this morning and sadly still same issue for me.
Internet connection configuration
Connection Information
Connection time
0 days, 10:05:37
Data Transmitted/Received (MB)
10.8 / 29.4
Broadband username
[email protected]
Password
Not configured
TCP/IP settings
Broadband network IP address
86.147.168.198
Default gateway
217.32.142.102
Primary DNS
194.72.0.114
Secondary DNS
62.6.40.162
The tracert comments make sense so that's helped me understand, thanks for checking that out.
So what's the best option for me? Am I wasting BT and my own time logging a case?
I'd not usually bother pursuing this for the sake of a single web site but I'm bemused how this has happened since last week?
Thanks again for all help and guidance.
PJ

Will a 2 port LAG setup between 2 cisco 200-50s create routing issues?

I followed this guide. http://sbkb.cisco.com/CiscoSB/GetArticle.aspx?docid=caae365b755f46f5989177cb68216304_Link_Aggregation_on_Cisco_Series_Managed_Switches.xml&pid=2&converted=0 and linked ports 2 and 26 on both switches. Outside IT staff seems to think this will cause routing issues if multiple vlans are not involved.

Hello,
VLANs are not required for LAGs to function properly. Once you configure the LAG members you can configure the LAG as a trunk port with multiple VLANs, and access port with just one, or even a routed port with an IP address on it.
As long as both sides of the LAG are configured the same way there won't be an issue. Since these switches are Layer 2 only, they don't even do any kind of routing, so your outside IT may have meant a layer 2 loop, which will happen with multiple connections between the same switches. But when you configure them as a LAG is treats those links as the same connection, so there is no layer 2 loop either.
Hope that helps,
Christopher Ebert - Advanced Network Support Engineer
Cisco Small Business Support Center
*please rate helpful posts*

Routing Issue with 3550 Switch

I am having an issue with routing with one of my Cisco 3550 switches. I know the 3550s are EoL but some of us have to work with what we have.
I am using a 3550 on either side of a Layer 2 link. The Layer 2 link is 2 Extreme Summit X-440 switches with Microwave between the switches. I have a VLAN configured on both switches and tagged on the ports connected to the Microwave. The 3550 switch on each end is configured for IP routing but I cannot pass traffic between the switches. If I unplug the switch on the local end and plug in a laptop, I can ping the switch on the remote end and access devices at the remote end.
I know this should work because I am doing the same thing over another Microwave link and Layer 2 link using another 3550 and a HP ProCurve at the remote end.
Here are the configs for each 3550:
Local end; Port Fa0/23 goes to the Remote Side. Port Fa0/24 goes to the rest of the network
Current configuration : 5417 bytes
! No configuration change since last restart
version 12.2
no service pad
service timestamps debug datetime localtime show-timezone
service timestamps log datetime localtime show-timezone
no service password-encryption
service sequence-numbers
hostname Brindley3550
enable secret 5 $1$3A.n$lzBUQg.fn4hJ7f0jEOqe71
no aaa new-model
clock timezone UTC -6
clock summer-time UTC recurring 1 Sun Apr 2:00 1 Sun Nov 2:00
mls qos map cos-dscp 0 8 16 26 32 46 48 56
mls qos min-reserve 5 170
mls qos min-reserve 6 10
mls qos min-reserve 7 65
mls qos min-reserve 8 26
mls qos
ip subnet-zero
ip routing
ip domain-name morgan911.net
ip name-server 1.2.150.11
ip name-server 1.2.150.5
spanning-tree mode pvst
no spanning-tree optimize bpdu transmission
spanning-tree extend system-id
vlan internal allocation policy ascending
interface FastEthernet0/1
switchport access vlan 18
switchport mode dynamic desirable
spanning-tree portfast
{Removed for Brevity}
|
interface FastEthernet0/7
switchport access vlan 13
switchport mode dynamic desirable
spanning-tree portfast
interface FastEthernet0/8
switchport access vlan 13
switchport mode dynamic desirable
spanning-tree portfast
{Removed for Brevity}
interface FastEthernet0/23
description To Gum Springs via Extreme P10
no switchport
ip address 1.2.147.1 255.255.255.252
speed 100
duplex full
interface FastEthernet0/24
description To Flint via Ceragon Eth 2
switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
switchport mode trunk
speed 100
duplex full
mls qos trust cos
auto qos voip trust
wrr-queue bandwidth 20 1 80 1
wrr-queue min-reserve 1 5
wrr-queue min-reserve 2 6
wrr-queue min-reserve 3 7
wrr-queue min-reserve 4 8
wrr-queue cos-map 1 0 1 2 4
wrr-queue cos-map 3 3 6 7
wrr-queue cos-map 4 5
priority-queue out
spanning-tree link-type point-to-point
interface GigabitEthernet0/1
switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
switchport mode trunk
interface GigabitEthernet0/2
switchport access vlan 10
switchport trunk native vlan 50
switchport mode dynamic desirable
spanning-tree portfast trunk
interface Vlan1
ip address 1.2.145.2 255.255.255.0
ip default-gateway 1.2.145.1
ip classless
ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 1.2.145.1
ip route 1.2.165.0 255.255.255.240 1.2.147.2
ip route 1.2.166.0 255.255.255.240 1.2.147.2
ip http server
snmp-server community public RO
snmp-server community public/RO RO
snmp-server location Brindlee Mountain Tower Site
snmp-server contact Jamey Wright
snmp-server enable traps snmp authentication linkdown linkup coldstart warmstart
snmp-server enable traps cluster
snmp-server enable traps entity
snmp-server enable traps envmon fan shutdown supply temperature
snmp-server enable traps vtp
snmp-server enable traps vlancreate
snmp-server enable traps vlandelete
snmp-server enable traps flash insertion removal
snmp-server enable traps port-security
snmp-server enable traps config
snmp-server enable traps syslog
snmp-server enable traps mac-notification
snmp-server enable traps vlan-membership
snmp-server host 1.2.150.100 public tty envmon syslog snmp
control-plane
ntp clock-period 17180143
ntp server 1.2.150.21
end
And this is the config for the remote end. Port Fa0/24 is the port for the link back to the local end.
Current configuration : 5058 bytes
version 12.2
no service pad
service timestamps debug datetime localtime show-timezone
service timestamps log datetime localtime show-timezone
no service password-encryption
service sequence-numbers
hostname GS3550
enable secret 5 $1$3A.n$lzBUQg.fn4hJ7f0jEOqe71
no aaa new-model
clock timezone UTC -6
clock summer-time UTC recurring
mls qos map cos-dscp 0 8 16 24 32 46 46 56
udld aggressive
ip subnet-zero
ip routing
ip domain-name morgan911.net
ip name-server 1.2.150.11
spanning-tree mode pvst
spanning-tree extend system-id
vlan internal allocation policy ascending
interface FastEthernet0/1
switchport access vlan 21
switchport mode dynamic desirable
spanning-tree portfast
interface FastEthernet0/2
switchport access vlan 21
switchport mode dynamic desirable
power inline delay shutdown 20 initial 300
spanning-tree portfast
{Removed for Brevity}
interface FastEthernet0/23
switchport access vlan 22
switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
switchport mode trunk
speed 100
duplex full
spanning-tree portfast
interface FastEthernet0/24
description To Brindlee via Extreme P10
switchport mode dynamic desirable
(Is a member of VLAN 1)
speed 100
spanning-tree portfast
interface GigabitEthernet0/1
switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
switchport mode trunk
interface GigabitEthernet0/2
switchport mode dynamic desirable
spanning-tree portfast
interface Vlan1
ip address 1.2.147.2 255.255.255.252
interface Vlan21
ip address 1.2.165.1 255.255.255.240
ip helper-address 1.2.150.11
ip helper-address 1.2.150.5
interface Vlan22
ip address 1.2.166.1 255.255.255.240
ip helper-address 1.2.150.5
ip helper-address 1.2.150.11
ip default-gateway 1.2.147.1
ip classless
ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 1.2.147.1 10
ip http server
snmp-server community public RO
snmp-server enable traps snmp authentication linkdown linkup coldstart warmstart
snmp-server enable traps cluster
snmp-server enable traps entity
snmp-server enable traps envmon fan shutdown supply temperature
snmp-server enable traps vtp
snmp-server enable traps vlancreate
snmp-server enable traps vlandelete
snmp-server enable traps flash insertion removal
snmp-server enable traps port-security
snmp-server enable traps config
snmp-server enable traps hsrp
snmp-server enable traps bridge newroot topologychange
snmp-server enable traps syslog
snmp-server enable traps mac-notification
snmp-server enable traps vlan-membership
snmp-server host 1.2.150.100 public envmon syslog snmp
control-plane
ntp clock-period 17180192
ntp server 1.2.150.21 key 0 prefer
Ideas? Anything stand out as grossly wrong? I have worked on this for 2 days and am at a loss.
Thanks
Jamey

Sorry for the delay in replying. Other items at the office took priority over this project. I tried that and no change. I pulled the switch from the remote site and took it back to the local end and connected the switches with a crossover cable and everything works fine. I have pretty much determined that it is an issue with the config in one of the Extreme switches. The config in those look pretty normal but there are a few things I am unsure of. Guess I'll see if there is a similar site for Extreme gear.
Thanks
Jamey

Apogee Mini-Me Routing Issues

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for