Appearance in different browsers

My web pages look fine in Safari, but lose almost all
formatting in Firefox and Explorer. Is there a setting wrong that I
can adjust or do I have to live with it?
Thanks.

How are you designing your pages? There are a lot of reasons
why this could be happening. This doesn't sound like a Contribute
problem, but rather a problem with the markup of the pages
themselves. You could try the W3C HTML Validator for
starters.

Similar Messages

I can't install ADE on my PC, because as I try to open it a message of error appears to me: The application will be closed. I've already try with different browsers and also with the manual installation, but nothing..

I can't install ADE on my PC, because as I try to open it a message of error appears to me: The application will be closed. I've already try with different browsers and also with the manual installation, but nothing..

1
Close all iWork applications
2
Uninstall Keynote; this must be done with an application remover tool to delete the installation properly. Appcleaner is known to work correctly for this purpose, it is free and can be downloaded from here: Appcleaner Download
3
empty the trash
4
shutdown the Mac and restart. After the start up chime, hold down the shift key until the apple logo appears
let the Mac complete the start up procedure completely, it will take longer than usual as the hard drive is being repaired
5
Reinstall Keynote by logging into the Mac App Store using download / install

Quicktime movie looks different in different browsers. Is there a fix?

I have an H.264 Quicktime movie (and will be making versions with the Sorenson Video 3 codec, WMV compatible files, and FLV as well), and it looks the way I want it to look in Firefox for Mac and Firefox for Vista. In Safari and Internet Explorer, the blacks are washed out and it looks less saturated (though this is probably due to the image being washed out).
Is there anything I can do? I know Safari reads color profiles now, but I don't know how to add that to a Quicktime movie, and that wouldn't fix the problem with IE (or, curiously, Firefox on XP). If I drop the blacks enough to make it look good in Safari and IE, it will be too dark for Firefox users. Firefox appears to be the one displaying it "properly" (how it looks in FCP and the stand-alone Quicktime player).

It is indeed tricky. I've spent a lot of time over the last few months trying to figure it all out and still can't wrap my head around it all. That's due in large part because there's a lot of misinformation out there.
Thanks for the article. It's interesting because I too set my monitor to 2.2 gamma (sRGB) but for the purpose of working on this project had reverted it to 1.8 (Cinema Display default), and it's been there for a long time now. It is interesting, but it didn't solve my problem.
My problem is different browsers show a Quicktime differently. Now that I've switched to 2.2, Firefox looks too dark and Safari looks just right (where as before Firefox looked just right and Safari was washed out). Is there or is there not an option to include a color profile with Quicktimes? If not, I'll have to make a compromise, and I'd rather have one that looks great across all high-end monitors (meaning an expensive Dell or Apple monitor on OSX, WXP, and WV).
Does anyone know what in particular is making the two browsers display Quicktimes differently?

Circles vs. squares in different browsers... Help!

Hello,
My website-building skills are very basic, but I just finished revising my website: http://www.sharibeaubien.com.
When I check the site in different browsers, I notice a discrepancy. I have a row of dots or circles underneath the main navigation near the top of the page. In Firefox and Internet Explorer, it appears as I intend it. However, Safari and Opera browsers display this row as a line of squares.
Is there any way to fix this so that the dots appear correctly in all browsers?
Thank you so much for any help you can provide.
Shari

Thank you so much for taking the time to respond to me.
If I decide to include the image in the style rule, how would I do that?
My guess is this:
1. Create the image in Photoshop
2. Save it as a jpeg within my site's folder
3. Add the property "background-image"
4. Search/browse for the image and insert it there
Is that correct?
I know the table-based layout is archaic, but it's what I'm familiar with and I didn't have the time to learn the newer format right now. Within the table, would I need to create a second row to house the image or could I just include it within the current row and the navigation?
Thank you so much. I can't express how much I really, really appreciate your help.
Shari

Items in the shopping cart appear with different price than in the catalog

Hi All,
We are running SRM 5.0 (Classic Scenario) with external catalogues.
After selecting items from the external catalogue and transferring them to the shopping cart, the items appear with different price(the problem exists in the productive system)
The strange thing is that there is no dependence or sequence between the differences. For example, in one shopping cart, one item is with correct price, the price of the other item is not correct (when I click on the icon which is showing item details in the catalogue, the price is different than the one in the shopping cart). Sometimes the difference is significant, sometimes not - if the item price in the catalogue is 22.34 EUR, in the shopping cart is 21.22EUR or if the item is 45.62EUR in the shopping cart is 45.60 EUR. There is no logic.
I tried to create a shopping cart in the support system, with the same items from this catalogue, and they are sent back in SRM with the correct prices.
I traced all OCI parameters, sent from the supplier catalogue, and everything is correct.
At the example given below the price in the shopping cart ordered in the productive system is 69.00CZK, and after that during the test the correct price of 73.870CZK has appeared.
NEW_ITEM-DESCRIPTION==Durable-KeyClip-keytag%2C+black
NEW_ITEM-MATNR==
NEW_ITEM-MATGROUP==
NEW_ITEM-QUANTITY==10
NEW_ITEM-UNIT==EA
NEW_ITEM-PRICE==73.870
NEW_ITEM-PRICEUNIT==1
NEW_ITEM-CURRENCY==CZK
NEW_ITEM-NEW_ITEM-LEADTIME==1
NEW_ITEM-VENDOR==
NEW_ITEM-VENDORMAT==0176%2F1957001
NEW_ITEM-MANUFACTCODE==
NEW_ITEM-MANUFACTMAT==
NEW_ITEM-CONTRACT==
NEW_ITEM-CONTRACT_ITEM==
NEW_ITEM-SERVICE==
NEW_ITEM-EXT_QUOTE_ID==
NEW_ITEM-EXT_QUOTE_ITEM==
NEW_ITEM-EXT_PRODUCT_ID==23109
NEW_ITEM-EXT_SCHEMA_TYPE==UNSPSC
NEW_ITEM-EXT_CATEGORY_ID==55121504
NEW_ITEM-LONGTEXT_1%3A132==Durable-KeyClip%0D%0Akeytag%2Cblack%0D%0A%0D%0A6pc
I checked the error log in SLG1 for BBP_OCI, and no error message exists. In my opinion the problem can be in supplier system, because otherwise all items will be with wrong price. And at the moment, there are shopping carts in which all items are with the correct price!
It is not something in the user profile, because in one shopping cart created by one user some items are correct, some of them not.
I also checked with the supplier, they said that they haven't change the price, recently.
Has somebody of you met this problem?
In the IMG-> Define External Web Services (Catalogs, Vendor Lists etc.) I have set all parameters for the standard call structure: the URL of the supplier, our company ID and password for their catalogue.
In the Detail view for the catalogue, the following parameters are set
u201CAdditional functions in the product catalogueu201D field:
-     Display product data again in the catalogue
-     Validate product data from SAP Enterprise Buyer
-     Find supply sources
u201CTechnical Settingsu201D field
- Use Error Log
Thanks,
Desi

That means that we are not maintaining material numbers in SRM, so there are no predefined price or info records for that materials in R/3 system, or in SRM.
In the set up of external catalogues, validation of the price is set. Which means that, if a new shopping cart is created from already existing one, and meanwhile, a change of the price is done by the supplier in the catalogue, the new item price will be adopted in the shopping cart.
No prices are maintained in the SRM system, everything is from the supplier catalogue.
Desi

CSS problem with content in different browsers?

I've been revamping the CSS for a website and got most internal pages to display normally on different browsers. However, the site entry page is driving me nuts. I think I've been staring at the code so long that I've overlooked an obvious error. In Firefox, the paragraph of intro text lines up nicely to the right of the navigation panel. In Google Chrome (and IE of course), it pops down underneath the nav panel as shown in screen capture below. Even if I zoom out. Included a link so you can see it in real time. (Since the revamp is recent, the style sheet isn't pretty.)
http://www.keithpurtell.com/kthings/index.htm

Sorry for the slow reply. Thanksgiving and family in town and all that. No I didn't fix or change anything. And I'll make sure the percentage match in the morning. It's after midnight here.

Issue with images in different browsers

Having an issue with different browsers -- hoped someone
could help.
If I open my site with IE, everything looks as it does in
Dreamweaver -- there is no overlap of text and images/etc.
If I open my site with Mozilla or Safari, it seems to
arbitrarily move up some of the images over the top of text. Not
all of the images, mind you -- just a few random ones throughout
the page.
Opening the following link in both type of browsers may give
you a clue as to what is going on. What can I do to get it to look
like it does in IE?
http://www.centecsystems.com/centecexample/disanapplications.htm

LOL ahem, 'scuze me. :-)
-N
"Walt F. Schaefer" <[email protected]> wrote in
message
news:[email protected]...
> >>For that we rely on IE hacks
>
> In polite company we call those "conditional comments".
> --
>
> Walt
>
>
> "Nancy O" <[email protected]> wrote in
message
> news:[email protected]...
> > First off, you are assuming incorrectly that IE is
the good browser and
> > Mozilla is the bad browser. Actually, it's the
other way around. If
you
> > build your sites to perform well in Mozilla,
chances are your sites will
> > look good in all major browsers except IE. For that
we rely on IE hacks
> > or
> > workarounds.
> >
> > Learning html and CSS takes time and effort but
it's very doable. You
> > would
> > be doing yourself a big favor by learning to work
with code now. Design
> > view is fine for some things, like typing content
and adding a few
images.
> > But eventually you have to pop the hood to check
the oil. If hiring a
pro
> > isn't an option, I suggest you purchase a solid
template to work with.
> > Money well-spent IMHO.
> >
http://www.projectseven.com/products/templates/
> >
> >
> >
> > --Nancy O.
> > Alt-Web Design & Publishing
> > www.alt-web.com
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > "PunIntended" <[email protected]>
wrote in message
> > news:[email protected]...
> >> Unfortunately, hiring someone is not an option
for my friend -- the
> > recession
> >> has hit them hard -- etc.etc. I'm doing it as a
favor.
> >>
> >> One additional question -- Why are only some of
the image files moved
> > when
> >> viewing in mozilla? I dont understand how
Dreamweaver arbitrarily
> >> chooses
> >> which are moved and which are not.
> >>
> >> Also, is laying out your site in 'design' mode
simply a bad idea? It
> > seems
> >> like it looks / works fine with IE, and the
majority of the layers are
> > correct
> >> in mozilla -- it just doesn't deal well with a
few of the images.
> >>
> >> Thank you again for all your comments - - like
I said, am sort of a
> > beginner
> >> -- just looking for the best method to fix the
problem. If the best
> > method is
> >> explaing to the graphic designers their
'vision' can't be accomplished,
> >> so
> > be
> >> it. I just want to know how to go about
attacking the browser
> > compatibility.
> >>
> >
> >
>
>

Newly created images will not display in Firefox 8 for Mac. Same images appear in other browsers. Why?

1. Specific new images are uploaded but will not display in Firefox 8 on my Mac with OS 10.6.8. (Does appear in other browsers, e.g., Chrome and Opera, and appears on Firefox 8 for PC.) Also, other images on the page display.
2. I have cleared cache, cookies, etc., in Recent History, and restarted both application and computer.
3. I've tried creating GIF, JPG and PNG, but none show on the page in Firefox on my Mac. I can see the offending image in other browsers such as Chrome on the same computer, and on Firefox on PC. Offending pages are in both PHP and HTML: http://www.brookfieldcivic.org/advertisers.php and http://www.brookfieldcivic.org/advertising_freedom_montessori.html
Image links: http://www.brookfieldcivic.org/images/advertisers/freedom.png and http://www.brookfieldcivic.org/images/advertisers/Freedom_Montessori_bizcard.jpg

You can use these steps to check if images are blocked:
*Open the web page that has the images missing in a browser tab.
*Click the website favicon ([[Site Identity Button]]) on the left end of the location bar.
*Click the "More Information" button to open the "Page Info" window with the Security tab selected (also accessible via "Tools > Page Info").
*Go to the <i>Media</i> tab of the "Tools > Page Info" window.
*Select the first image link and scroll down through the list with the Down arrow key.
*If an image in the list is grayed and there is a check-mark in the box "<i>Block Images from...</i>" then remove that mark to unblock the images from that domain.

Download Issues With Different Browsers

I'm using a simple, simple download example app to fetch a
file from a tomcat server. It seems to work fine on Mozilla
fireFox, but when I use it with safari or opera I get the following
error;
quote:
Error #2044: Unhandled IOErrorEvent:. text=Error #2038: File
I/O Error.
at
flexDownloadExample/init()[/Applications/apache-tomcat-5.5.1/webapps/flexDownloadExample/ src/flexDownloadExample.mxml:40]
at
flexDownloadExample/___flexDownloadExample_Application1_creationComplete()[/Applications/ apache-tomcat-5.5.1/webapps/flexDownloadExample/src/flexDownloadExample.mxml:2]
at flash.events::EventDispatcher/dispatchEventFunction()
at flash.events::EventDispatcher/dispatchEvent()
at
mx.core::UIComponent/dispatchEvent()[E:\dev\3.0.x\frameworks\projects\framework\src\mx\co re\UIComponent.as:9051]
at mx.core::UIComponent/set
initialized()[E:\dev\3.0.x\frameworks\projects\framework\src\mx\core\UIComponent.as:1167]
at
mx.managers::LayoutManager/doPhasedInstantiation()[E:\dev\3.0.x\frameworks\projects\frame work\src\mx\managers\LayoutManager.as:698]
at Function/
http://adobe.com/AS3/2006/builtin::apply()
at
mx.core::UIComponent/callLaterDispatcher2()[E:\dev\3.0.x\frameworks\projects\framework\sr c\mx\core\UIComponent.as:8460]
at
mx.core::UIComponent/callLaterDispatcher()[E:\dev\3.0.x\frameworks\projects\framework\src \mx\core\UIComponent.as:8403]
I have absolutely no idea why this is. I havent been able to
test this in internet explorer, but i'm guessing it will show the
same error. My question then is, why is it that the code below
works for one browser and not for another?

Font Rendering
Every browser and operating system and browser and operating sytem version (just about) renders text differently. Chrome on Windows is currently the worst at rendering text, since it's using an old Windows API which uses an outdated anti-aliasing algorithm for the text. So text in Chrome on Windows generally looks worse that text drawn in other browser or on other operating systems. Typekit has a 7 part blog post here <http://blog.typekit.com/2010/10/05/type-rendering-on-the-web/> about all the ins and outs of font display in different browsers and operating systems.
Scroll Effects
Scroll effects are measured from the top of the browser window. Thus when the height of the browser window differs, even on the same computer, where the top of the browser window is relative to your objects when the page is scrolled all the way to the bottom will differ. Without the URL for your site/page, this is only a guess, but I suspect this is what you're encountering.
Several customers have asked for an option to set the key position as a distance from the bottom of the browser window rather than always being from the top in order to create items that have a specific final location when a page is scrolled all the way to the bottom, but Muse doesn't currently have that feature.

How do I make my animation look the same in different browsers?

Hi!
When I play my animation in different browsers it don't look the same as in the preview. In IE some of the parts of the animation have disappeared and in Chrome the pats are no longer in their right places. See picture below.
How do I do to make the animations look the same in different browsers?
(In the end I want to use the animations in my captivate 8 project. )
BR,
M

Ah, found the issue, the problem is with the name of the two images,
genomförande (instead you can use genomforande)
Grå bakgrund (instead you can use grabakgrund)
Seems like IE is having issue with those special characters.
hth,
Vivekuma

When duplicating a field, even when the original field is locked, the duplicated fields appear at different positions on pages that are the same size. How do I make them uniform?

I'm trying to put a hidden time stamp field on the bottom of all pages of a thousand page document, yet when I duplicate the field, the reproduced fields appear at different positions on different pages. Is there a way to make them all appear uniformly on each page. I've tried using the Lock function in the Properties menu before duplicating but to no avail. Please help.

I go to Tools>Forms> Edit...Do you want to detect...No. Add New Field>Text Field. I lay out my field at the bottom of the page, adjust the Properties (Hidden but printable, read only, font, alignment), Lock the Properties. Then I right-click and hit Duplicate.

Trying to download iTunes on my husband's windows vista laptop and we keep getting error messages that say error z, apple application support was not found, windows error 2. Tried 2 different browsers and it still would not work. Can you help? Thank you.

Trying to download iTunes on my husband' s windows vista laptop. Have tried 2 different browsers and it almost finishes the download process and we get error messages that say "error z, apple application was not found, windows error 2" Can you help? Thank you.

See Troubleshooting issues with iTunes for Windows updates.
tt2

Text in tables shifting in different browsers...

I have set up a page using tables.
In the middle of the page are 4 images pulled in and lined up
horizontally separated by table cells (for some space).
The tables immediately underneath the photos are for adding
text.
I center aligned the text and am controlling only the font
style (no colors, sizes, etc) from a separate external CSS file.
The first line of text is "paragraph" format, the second line
of text is bigger/different color and in "heading 1" format, the
third chunk of text is "paragraph" format also (it's an actual
paragraph).
When I view this page in the 4 main web browsers, this text
shifts up and down. In other words, all 4 photos underneath
descriptions are not aligned nicely horizontally. The tables are
perfectly aligned, so why is the text moving vertically inside when
previewed?
Here's a link to my site:
http://student.ccbcmd.edu/~rsmit459/playingthedrums/index.html
View it in different browsers and watch the copy under the
photos shift vertically (not lined up across the page).

*bump*

Help required to understand interactive SWF appearance on various browsers and pc's

I have created an interactive newsletter for global distribution.
My work machine uses a resolution of 1280 x 1024
However, my company uses different browsers and laptops globally, as we have approx 150,000 employees.
The Indesign pages are 1000 x 800 px
When I sent out a few test files, I received various issues from different people.
Some using IE6, IE7 and IE8 complained that although their resolutions were 1280 x 800, or 1280 x 1024, the top and bottom of the swf files were either cut off or the file was presented with text too small to read.
Using Firefox, some of the people also said that the file presented with the top and bottom cut off.
My own PC using either IE8 or Firefox @ 1280 x 1024 presents the file perfectly fine.
Now, with IE 8 and firefox, by either using the CTRL + middle mouse wheel, or CTRL and + or - the SWF file resized correctly by zooming in and out.
For IE6 the user would need to right click and choose Zoom in or Zoom out.
Most users are, and I am not being patronising here, not computer savvy, and would not generally know how to perform this option. They simply use the computers to do their job and panic if a java updated is presented.
I need to avoid this if I am to pursue the interactive SWF file approach.
Has anyone else experienced this and can you offer a solution that, no matter the resolution ot Browser used the SWF file will present correctly all the time?
thanks

The usual approach is to assume the smallest pixel dimension for a desktop is 1024x768, so you set the flash stage at around 900x650. If you are coding in Actionscript there is the option to listen for a browser resize and rearrange the objects on the stage to fit the space, but that's not an option saving out of ID. The best approach is to setup your ID page to 900x650, and make sure the text is readable at 100% view.

HT1338 I am trying to register my Appliances and when I try to click on "Save" or "Submit" I am unable on my MacBook pro. I have tried different browsers yet still same problem. Can anyone shed some light on this please.

I am trying to register my Appliances and when I try to click on "Save" or "Submit" I am unable on my MacBook pro. I have tried different browsers yet still same problem. Can anyone shed some light on this please.

Thanks for that 'sberman' - because my iPhone is backed-up to my work computer (only at this stage) I have had to call our IT Department in Adleaide. (4 times this morning). The last guy managed to get the phone into 'DFU Mode' - no more recovery mode screen - (kind of 'asleep' perhaps) from my understanding of same. I am awaiting a call again from IT so they can get my computer to actually recognise my iPhone on the C Drive. This also happened to one of my colleagues in Newman (WA). She got so frustrated with the whole process that she bought another phone the next time she was in 'civilisation.' She hasn't had any problems since. (Cross fingers).
Thanks again, Sandra2474.

Appearance in different browsers

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for