Applications Core and Applications Core(Attachments) library

Hi,
I have installed jdevstudio 11114 install .exe . I was trying to add - Applications Core and Applications Core(Attachments) library in Model but couldn't find in the "Add Library" list. So, wanted to know from which version and above these libraries are available?
Actually I want to use "Attachments feature" in ADF. So, Can we get these libraries externally and add it to JDEV 11.1.1.4 version or I will have to use different version to access Attachments feature?
Thanks in Advance.
Best Regards,
Shalini Jain

Hi,
Thanks for Replying. ADF InputFile Component is for uploading only. What I want to achieve is - I want to display Attachments for a particular Requistion_Header_Id in EBS. These attachments are stored in FND_ATTACH_DOCUMENTS and the other FND related tables. That is why I was looking for that particular library. In case you can guide me on some other way to achieve this functionality, then it will be really helpful.
Thanks in Advance.
Best Regards,
Shalini

Similar Messages

  • Is there any methods like application activated and application de-actived in windows app 8.1

    Hi,
    Is there any events such as on application loaded and application closed in windows store app 8.1
    Thanks,
    Alok

    Please see the application lifecycle page:
    https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/apps/hh464925.aspx
    Matt Small - Microsoft Escalation Engineer - Forum Moderator
    If my reply answers your question, please mark this post as answered.
    NOTE: If I ask for code, please provide something that I can drop directly into a project and run (including XAML), or an actual application project. I'm trying to help a lot of people, so I don't have time to figure out weird snippets with undefined
    objects and unknown namespaces.

  • Difference between application.cfm and application.cfc

    Hi,
    Can anybody explain the difference between Application.cfm
    and application.cfc?
    For example:
    I have Application.cfm and Application.cfc in the same
    folder.
    /folder/application.cfm
    /folder/application.cfc
    /folder /test.cfm
    …. And I run the test.cfm.
    Which one is executed first?
    Thanks,
    Krishna

    Your last question - Which one is executed first?
    The application.cfc will be executed first if you call the
    test.cfm. The application.cfm will not get executed.
    and, about ur first question... cfm and cfc are entirely
    different. You have onRequestStart, onRequestEnd and other events
    on cfc. cfc is powerful than cfm.

  • Difference between Application log and Application server

    Hello Friends,
            Could you plz explain difference between  Application log and Application server?
    Regards
    Kanth

    Application log is details about the business transaction,  ie status / error messages
    Application server is the system <hardware> on which application is running.
    Regards,
    Mahesh

  • Quad core and Four core cpu's

    Hi guys,
    i have a silly question my macbook pro of late 2011 has Intel i7 cpu runs at 2.2 GHz and has four cores ,now my question
    is Quad core and Four cores is one and the same.
    Please donot lough my question.
    prabh s

    Thank you very much.
    prabhi s

  • Deciding between a Quad-Core and 8-Core

    Hi, I am getting ready to purchase a new Mac Pro and trying to decide between a Quad-Core with 3.33 and 16 GB RAM or 8-Core with 2.26 and 32 MB RAM.
    I use Adobe CS4 Photoshop, Illustrator, Fireworks, Dreamweaver, Flash, InDesign, Quark 8, Parallels, MS Office and occasionally Final Cut Pro 5.
    My current machine is almost four years old. I keep my machines 3-4 years.
    Any advice or suggestions?

    Partitioning a boot drive helps... if the 2nd partition is just junk, clutter, static files, archived, or maybe those "Download" or updates you want to keep around for later.
    Another use, a small 30GB emergency-only boot volume to do repairs (but best to be on one of your other drives of course, using small portion.
    A 640GB WD Caviar Black is cheap and fast and nothing to sneeze at (stock OEM boot drive, doesn't hurt). A pair of 10K 300GB is nice, or two in RAID0.
    System - Data - Scratch - Backup is a good way to use the 4 drive bays.
    BUT! and HOWEVER! having at most 20GB (and probably less) is not a good idea. 10GB free minimum is cutting it close. Programs and the system like free space - unfragmented too. I try to keep 50% free, or at least 60GB. And find a 150GB is fine - for just the OS and applications (though apps can vary, X-Plane can take 60GB itself).
    So I'd pick up a drive today, whether $70 640GB or 10K 300GB $189 (try Newegg too).
    http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16822136555&Tpk=VelociRaptor %20600GB
    You can always add drives and use some for backups (2 for each volume you have at least). The main thing, to get the Mac you need or want.
    The 3.33's do show up on SPECIALS, and go even quicker
    http://store.apple.com/us/browse/home/specialdeals/mac/mac_pro
    edited

  • Content-type: application/xml and Application server 9

    I have a web service running on Application server 9, implemented using netbeans and JAX-WS.
    When a client sends a request to it with:
    Content-type: application/xml
    the request is rejected because the server does not recognise the mime type.
    Specifically, the response is:
    HTTP/1.1 415 Unsupported Media Type
    X-Powered-By: Servlet/2.5
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
    Date: Fri, 01 Sep 2006 14:49:04 GMT
    Server: Sun Java System Application Server Platform Edition 9.0
    Connection: close
    Everything works fine when the request has:
    Content-type: text/xml
    Is there a way to make my web service accept content type of 'application/xml'?
    -Tony Beaumont
    Aston University
    beaumoaj

    I have fixed this for myself, i.e. decompile, replace in jar.
    My problem was that most tools define the encoding but code was simply testing
    if( contentType.equalsIgnoreCase( "text/xml" ) )
    so sending xml from other tools that send contentType
    "text/xml;encoding=UTF-8" or some such, like soap tools, would mean no XML was seen.
    Is the proper source available for XSQL?

  • Licensing for Forms Application (Database and Application Server)

    I was going to give Oracle a call, but I wanted to run this buy you guys before I did so.
    I am a developer trying to find a niche creating a custom software application. I have two ideas (partially developed), but before I continue, I want to determine the costs to my target customer/audience.
    The application is Forms and Reports based (Oracle 6i). I can deploy the application as the 6i runtime clients, or I can migrate the application to Oracle Forms 10g. In both of those deployments, what would be the cost to me? From what I understand, please correct me if I am wrong, but it appears that I will have the following costs:
    Product (quantity) = Cost / ALS
    Oracle Developer license (1) = $460 / $102
    Oracle Database - standard edition one (5 users) = $900 / $200
    If web deployment:
    Oracle Application Server - standard edition one (5 users) = $900 / $200
    So $2260 for web deployment (5 users) and $1360 for client/server (5 user) application - Is that correct? I am trying to write customized applications for the mom and pop shops in my area. There is no way they will even consider paying that kind of money for my application (the above prices does not include any profit for me, either - ugh!).
    What options do I have (if any)?
    Thanks in advance for your feedback,
    Mike
    Edited by: user639843 on Oct 27, 2008 12:56 PM

    Hi Mike,
    Please call up the Oracle Embedded Business Unit or the associated rep in your area. They will help you with the right licensing options.
    If you let me know which country you are in, I can point you to the right person too.
    Regards
    BALAJI T

  • About Quad Core and Dual Core PowerMacG5

    Hi everyone,
    A guy is selling two Power Mac G5.
    I'm not so familiar with these G5 line-up, and i'm asking for help.
    He send me pictures, he took pictures of both Power Mac's from inside.
    In one of them was written only G5 (like this:   
    Another one was written G5 two times(like this:   
    So can anyone help me which one is the Quad Core 2.5GHz? And is this Two Processor one from Late 2005 or older?
    Respect, Leon.

    Hi Leon, if he doesn't know...
    Find the Serial# & use it on one of these sites, but don't post the Serial# here...
    http://www.chipmunk.nl/klantenservice/applemodel.html
    http://www.appleserialnumberinfo.com/Desktop/index.php
    How to find the serial number of your Apple hardware product...
    http://support.apple.com/kb/HT1349

  • What the heck is Single Core, Dual Core, and Quad Core Processor Configurat

    I am listing an eMac computer on ebay. I have all the information necessary except processor configuration. Do eMacs come with Single, Dual, or Quad processor configurations? Or does it vary? I don't even know what those are really.

    Make sure to follow these steps when selling*:
    http://www.macmaps.com/selling.html
    As was already indicated all eMacs were single core.
    Apple didn't start releasing multicore machines until the later G5s.
    - * Links to my pages may give me compensation.

  • Difference between Real Application Testing and Application Testing Suite?

    We need to find out average time to execute critical reports. Some reports takes about 24 hours to execute. We want to predict the times of future reports after benchmarking our current DB.
    (1.) Which of the 2 should we use (RAT or ATS)?
    (2.) What are the differences between the 2?
    (3.) Can these products be used in both 10g and 11g DBs?
    (4.) Are these 2 ''options'' that come with the DB? or
    (5.) Do we have to purchase them separately and install separately?
    (6.) Does these tools have Windows interfaces?

    Thanks aamat.
    Most of our DBs are and will be in 10g. I think it will take at least a year or two to move to 11g. So we are basically stuck with 10g.
    So you’re saying we need a 11g DB to run RAT. I.e. you have to install RAT in a 11g. That wont suite our requirements since our DBs are in 10g.
    About ATS: The most demanding/frequent requirement from our prospective customers is:
    > "We create an ad-hoc report query. How do we find out the time it will take to execute it?"In order to solve this we are hoping to suggest this to our customers:
    1.) Replicate the servers and DB (with real data) in another identical machine.
    2.) Select about 10 report queries which normally takes a long time to execute.
    3.) Execute them and get the times (For single and multiple users).
    4.) These will form the benchmark.
    *[Q1.]* Now, can our prospective users, use ATS do this. I.e. Can they, the users on their own operate ATS (of course after giving them training)?
    *[Q2.]* Can ATS use the output of the previous (i.e. benchmark) SQL queries (with live data) and if given another SQL, estimate the time it will take to execute it?
    -- i.e. can ATS compare the tables, SQL query and times of past results and give us an estimate for our new query?
    *[Q3.]* If this is not possible in ATS can it be done it RAT? In this case we will have to demand that they upgrade to 11g.
    Edited by: Channa on Aug 26, 2010 6:56 AM

  • This.name and application.name different?

    Hello,
    how come that, within the application.cfc file, this.name and application.name are different?
    Shouldn't this.name be inherited by the application? Isn't that confusing?
    Thanks for clarification

    If I recall correctly, you use this.name to set your application name in Application.cfc, and Application.applicationName to read it in other files. Application.name is just a variable you've created in the Application scope.
    Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software
    http://www.figleaf.com/
    http://training.figleaf.com/

  • 2014 Mac Pro, 12-core vs 8-core

    I regards to Adobe CC performance, I am weighing between Apple's new Mac Pro 8-core and 12-core options, with dual AMD Firepro d700 GPUs, without a red-rocket.  I would like this computer to be a 7-ish year computer, or longer.  I understand the 8-core is crazy powerful, and pretty darn future-proof.  Will there be a benefit to spending the extra $1500 on the 12-core or just calling-it at the 8? 
    My workflow is all Adobe, and I am shooting all projects in full 4k at lowest compression available (6:1 Redcode with the Scarlet?, 3:1 for a run-of-the-mill 5k timelapse?).  My projects range from 4-6-min highly polished and graphics-intensive sizzle reels or industrials, to 15-20 min presentation reels.  There will be OCCASIONAL, but not frequent, 23 or 48 min pilots on the order for 2014.  There are also occasional TV spots in the mix as well, for older clients.  All projects are completed soup-to-nuts by me, with very rare and limited exceptions.  Those exceptions being a rare Cinema 4D counterpart to a larger project.  For those instances, I WOULD want to be able to handle the projects delivered by a vendor working with 3D modeling, although that's rare, and for "special occasions only!" 
    I'm sure you don't have all of the answers, but I'd like to get your perspective on the whole 8-core vs. 12-core debate.  Thank you for your time!

    I regards to Adobe CC performance, I am weighing between Apple's new Mac Pro 8-core and 12-core options, with dual AMD Firepro d700 GPUs, without a red-rocket.  I would like this computer to be a 7-ish year computer, or longer.  I understand the 8-core is crazy powerful, and pretty darn future-proof.  Will there be a benefit to spending the extra $1500 on the 12-core or just calling-it at the 8? 
    My workflow is all Adobe, and I am shooting all projects in full 4k at lowest compression available (6:1 Redcode with the Scarlet?, 3:1 for a run-of-the-mill 5k timelapse?).  My projects range from 4-6-min highly polished and graphics-intensive sizzle reels or industrials, to 15-20 min presentation reels.  There will be OCCASIONAL, but not frequent, 23 or 48 min pilots on the order for 2014.  There are also occasional TV spots in the mix as well, for older clients.  All projects are completed soup-to-nuts by me, with very rare and limited exceptions.  Those exceptions being a rare Cinema 4D counterpart to a larger project.  For those instances, I WOULD want to be able to handle the projects delivered by a vendor working with 3D modeling, although that's rare, and for "special occasions only!" 
    I'm sure you don't have all of the answers, but I'd like to get your perspective on the whole 8-core vs. 12-core debate.  Thank you for your time!

  • Should i Take the more expensive Mac mini (quad core) or dual core

    Hey guys!
    I don't now if I should take the Mac mini with dual core or quad core
    I have never had a Mac so I don't now if the quad core (200$ more) is better than the dual core  :o
    I use it only for standard things (email, web, twitter Mac App Store games)
    But it also should not stuck at bit more powerful apps and run crystal clear !!!
    I want to have the Mac mini for few years !
    Thanks now!

    The difference in real performance between dual core
    and quad core machines is highly dependent on the
    apps one uses and how many at the same time.
    If you really only ever have one or perhaps two apps
    open at once and if these apps are like web browsers
    or email, you may never really notice a difference.
    However, if you have many apps open at once or use
    apps that can utilize many cores at the same time (typically
    imaging and video apps), then there will be a significant
    performance increase.
    As far as gaming, by and large the most significant impact
    on game performance is the graphics processing unit (GPU).
    The integrated Intel HD4000 GPU in the Minis can typically
    handle mid range games but will struggle on the very highend
    games.
    Also, if apps are not designed for mutiple core usage, there will be
    now real improvement between 2 or 4 core machines.  As a matter
    of fact, I have a few apps that are faster on my MBP 13" 2.7 GHz
    2 core i7 than on my quad core i7 2.0 GHz Mini Server for this
    very reason.
    So, the bottom line is that for some a quad core machine will
    blow away a dual core machine while for others, there will be
    no noticable difference.

  • New Mac-quad core or 8 core for youth club studio...

    Hi there.
    I have some money to kit out a studio in a youth club. I'm going the Mac route and Logic pro will be one of the programs we run. Once ive spent the cash thats it, so I'm hoping to go as powerful as possible.
    I am looking at the new Nehalem quad core and 8 core models. At first I was going to opt for the 8 core (this may seem like overkill for a youth club, but I have worked with them for some years and we finally have a chance to get some really tasty kit!), but then I read the following article that suggested on paper that the 2.66ghz quad core is actually faster than the 2.26ghz 8 core;
    http://www.macworld.com/article/139507/2009/03/macpro2009.html
    I have been trying to find out if Logic Pro is a program that can make use of the extra cores. I am guessing not, but have not been able to find confirmation on this.
    Question is, for longevity and a super fast machine, what would you recommend. I could get a slightly faster quad core than the base unit, but I am guessing in the future to go up to 8 core, you would need a completely new machine pretty much rather than upgradeing. I have mostly been a PC user, so these top end macs are a bit new to me.
    Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated
    Many thanks
    Smoulders

    I disagree that Logic fully uses all 8 cores (16 including the hyperthreading cores). Logic seems to max out at 8 threads, and it is able to take advantage of hyperthread cores. The result of this is that while it uses 8 cores on an octo machine, it also uses 8 cores on a quad machine (4 cores plus 4 HT cores), and the difference between the two is considerably less than it should be.
    Hopefully soon there will be a version of Logic that uses 16 threads and takes advantage of HT on the octo machines, but in the meantime, much of the available CPU power is going unused. An octo can max out at 1600% cpu use, but logic is lucky to make it to 400%. It can reach that same level on a quad core i7. Same goes for Logic benchmarks, the difference in actual processing power isn't much, especially if the quad is at a higher clock speed.
    Anyone who has an 8 core machine can test this, there's a Processor control panel that lets you disable cores (or hyperthreading). If you disable four cores, it will just use the hyperthreading cores instead with only a minimal loss of CPU power in Logic.

Maybe you are looking for