Applications Stuck at 0% Downloading in Software Center

I'm currently utilizing a SCCM 2012 R2 environment with roughly 100 Distribution Points.  The problem I'm running into is that random Applications will get stuck at 0% downloading at a location for all client PCs.  This same application will have
no problem at a different location using a different DP.  The only remediation I could find was to redistribute the application to the specific DP.  Once this is done, the application downloads and installs without a problem.
What is frustrating is the fact that this appears to be happening to random applications.  It's never for an application in which all distribution points need to redistribute, it's always one single DP.  It also appears to be happening for random
DPs, it hasn't been the same DP ever.
Any suggestions would be extremely helpful, and I could provide additional information if need be.

Hi,
I found several similar threads in this forum. And many reasons are causing the same symptom. Such as IIS permission on specific folder, device moving from a collection to
another.
Software
Center stuck on Downloading (0% complete) when trying to install an application
SCCM
2012 R2 Stuck at "Downloading (0% Complete)
Programmatically
Deployed TaskSequence getting Stuck in Software Center at Downloading(0%) of Resource.
In addition, logs are always helpful to the troubleshooting.
distmgr.log
Records details about package creation, compression, delta replication, and information updates.
execmgr.log
Records details about packages and task sequences that run on the client.

Similar Messages

  • Application stuck at "Content Downloaded"

    Hi..
    i'm pushing out Office 2013 and have had good results, however there are still a number of clients that have downloaded the application, but are not installing it.
    Admin console says:  Content Downloaded
    Client Software Center says:  Past Due - Will be retried.
    I setup the application deployment to be made available at 8PM last night, with a install deadline of 10PM, and for the most part it went fine.
    At 11PM I triggered the Application Deployment cycle on the targeted collection and all the clients that were stuck at "content downloaded" started the install.
    So my question is, what would cause this random group of clients to download the content, but not install it the deadline?

    Hi,
    Have you checked logs about application on the client? Such as AppIntentEval.log, AppEnforce.log? Any information? You could also check CAS.log, ContentTransferManager.log, DataTransferService.log and FileBITS.log.
    Best Regards,
    Joyce
    We
    are trying to better understand customer views on social support experience, so your participation in this
    interview project would be greatly appreciated if you have time.
    Thanks for helping make community forums a great place.

  • Software center downloading 0%

    I created my June update (14 updates) all but 4 are seem to be stuck when looking at the Software Center Downloading 0% , it's been like this for 2 days. 
    MSB

    Is this all clients or just the one client?
    What to the logs say on the client for contenttransfermanager, cas, and/or updatesdeployment.log?  (there are more logs that might have information, too, but those are some to start with).
    My guess is the content you want simply isn't on your distribution points, or that particular client can't find the content on your DPs, possibly you've protected your DPs and this client doesn't have rights to the DPs with that content. (?)
    Standardize. Simplify. Automate.

  • Applications Installed through task sequence not showing up in Software Center

    In the task sequence we use for our OSD Windows 7 machine build, we have Custom-Install Application steps which install a number of of our Applications.  Each of these Applications has the "Allow this application to be installed from the Install
    Application task sequence action without being deployed" checkbox checked.  All of the Applications have the following properties set:
    Installation behavior: Install for system
    Logon requirement: Whether or not a user is logged in
    Installation program visibility: Hidden
    When a machine is built using this task sequence, all of the Applications install successfully - they show up in Control Panel\Programs and Features, and they run correctly. However, none of them show up in the Software Center. I'm not seeing anything in
    any of the logs that indicates a problem, and the Software Center remains empty even after running all the client evaluation cycle actions  
    Interestingly, if I add a couple of the newly build machines to a collection, then target deployments for the already installed Applications to that collection, after running the Machine Policy Retrieval and Evaluation Cycle the Applications immediately
    show up in Software Center as installed.
    Does anyone know if Applications installed through a task sequence do not show up in the Software Center by default, or could you give me some troubleshooting tips if this is not normal?
    Thanks for any suggestions!
    SCCM 2012 SP1, Single site, W7 clients

    Why you deploy applications through task sequences? Task sequences are built and meant to be used with OSD, not application deployment.
    To my knowledge, if you have application install step in a task sequence and you deploy that task sequence to a collection of machines, the software center on those machines only sees the task sequence itself, not the applications inside the task sequence.
    If you want your applications to be shown in the software center, change the method of deploying stuff and deploy applications as they're are meant to.

  • Software Center application shows Installing after it's uninstalled.

    I have an odd situation.  I have an application which uninstalls from software center, gives and exit code of 0.  and is then not detected.  For all intents and purposes it should simply show available, but it shows installing, and it never
    stops.  THere is nothing in appenforce to show what it's doing.  It's been 3 days and I'm at a loss.  Any help would be great.

    So I've checked the following logs.
    AppIntentEval.log:
    Shows the application 
    Current State= Not Installed
    Applicability= Applicable
    ResolvedState= Available
    ConfigureState= NotNeeded
    AppEnforce.log:
    Shows the application
    exit code is 0
    Application has been set to force a reboot, and to not.
    If no reboot, then application is not deiscovered after uninstall
    Software Center is still showing the application as "Installing"  It's installing 2 MSIs in an install.cmd.  just FYI.  Any thoughts?

  • SCCM 2012 Software Center remembered user apps

    Hi
    Most of our packages are advertised to all users, only a few are advertised to machines. When a new user 'A' opens the Software Center only the packages advertised to the machine appear in the list with a status of available.
    When I login as a User 'B' that has previously installed packages they appear as installed in the Software Center list, as expected.
    When I re image the machine and reset the user B's profile and login as User B the applications appear in Software Center as available.
    User Affinity is turned off, How can I ensure these Applications don't re appear in Software Center?
    Thanks
    Ian

    I don't understand the behaviour you are referring to.
    AVAILABLE deployments to USERS can be seen in the application catalog. All other deployments will be shown in Software Center. That includes REQUIRED delpoyments to users, AVAILABLE & REQUIRED to devices.
    As far as I'm aware there are no exceptions
    http://blogs.technet.com/b/configmgrteam/archive/2012/03/31/introducing-the-application-catalog-and-software-center-in-system-center-2012-configuration-manager.aspx
    Gerry Hampson | Blog:
    www.gerryhampsoncm.blogspot.ie | LinkedIn:
    Gerry Hampson | Twitter:
    @gerryhampson

  • Software Center - Update stuck downloading

    Good morning
    We have pushed a few updates out to a number of clients via SCCM but for some reason we have an update (KB2962407) which appears to be stuck in the Downloading stage. It's stuck at 50%.
    I have manually downloaded this update and installed it to the clients but in Software Center it is still showing up 'Downloading (50%)
    I know this update has now been installed.
    Is there a way for me to make this disappear or see it as being installed?

    Hi,
    Are you sure that the update in questions is distributed to the DP that the client use? Normally these issues are related to content not beeing available, boundary / boundary groups noty configured correctly.
    Here is a blog post that explains log files and assists in the troubleshooting process.
    http://it.peikkoluola.net/2013/12/02/windows-update-sup-troubleshooting-in-sccm-2012/
    Regards,
    Jörgen
    -- My System Center blog ccmexec.com -- Twitter
    @ccmexec

  • Clients cant download application from software center [ error : 0x87d00607 ]

    I've got a small SCCM 2012 deployment with about 3 clients , these three clients cant download application available on software center!
    i checked out my boundries and boundries group and they are well configured .
    help plz

    i have just a subnet configuration in my boundary so there's no association against the site in AD
    Houda
    Subnet or IP ranges? Best to configure with IP ranges. 
    http://blog.configmgrftw.com/ip-subnet-boundaries-still-evil/
    Cheers Paul | http://sccmentor.wordpress.com

  • Applications not visible in Software Center

    Hello Guys,
    some Clients have Problems to show Application Deployments in Software Center. In Deployment Monitoring Tool I can see the Deployments. But if you select the Deployment I get the Error "DT cannot be empty". So I think the
    Policy isn't downloaded correctly.
    CIDownloader.log.
    CCIDownloadItem::AddToManifest - Starting download of DocumentType 2 for ModelName Windows/x64_Windows_Server_2008_R2_Core, Version 1 CIDownloader 24.01.2013 11:00:54 5068 (0x13CC)
    CCIDownloadItem::AddToManifest - Starting download of DocumentType 1 for ModelName Windows/x86_Embedded_Windows_7, Version 2 CIDownloader 24.01.2013 11:00:54 5068 (0x13CC)
    CCIDownloadItem::AddToManifest - Starting download of DocumentType 2 for ModelName Windows/x86_Embedded_Windows_7, Version 2 CIDownloader 24.01.2013 11:00:54 5068 (0x13CC)
    CCIDownloadItem::AddToManifest - Starting download of CI content document with DocumentName urn:policy-platform:policy.microsoft.com:smlif:ms.dcm.Windows.x86_Windows_7_Client:1:VL, DocumentVersion 1 (VL) CIDownloader 24.01.2013 11:00:54 5068 (0x13CC)
    CCIDownloader::ParseDtsMessage - Dts failed with error code: 0x80070002. CI Downloader will retry. CIDownloader 24.01.2013 11:00:54 4008 (0x0FA8)
    CIDownloaderJob({CFEBCEF0-7D16-421D-A53A-2A26F82CE5BF}): Received Dts failure message during CI download. CIDownloader 24.01.2013 11:00:54 4008 (0x0FA8)
    CIDownloaderJob({CFEBCEF0-7D16-421D-A53A-2A26F82CE5BF}): CCIDownloaderJob::QueueRetry - Consumed 5763 seconds of 172800 second download window. CIDownloader 24.01.2013 11:00:54 4008 (0x0FA8)
    CIDownloaderJob({CFEBCEF0-7D16-421D-A53A-2A26F82CE5BF}): CCIDownloaderJob::QueueRetry - Retrying package download in 2880 seconds... CIDownloader 24.01.2013 11:00:54 4008 (0x0FA8)
    CCIDownloader::CreateJob CIDownloader 24.01.2013 11:21:50 44 (0x002C)
    CCIDownloader::StartJob CIDownloader 24.01.2013 11:21:50 44 (0x002C)
    CIDownloader job empty. CIDownloader 24.01.2013 11:21:50 44 (0x002C)
    CCIDownloader::DeleteJob for job {D10C1E70-D480-4C05-9C95-D4BCBECFD4F1} CIDownloader 24.01.2013 11:21:50 44 (0x002C)
    CIDownloader job deleted. CIDownloader 24.01.2013 11:21:50 44 (0x002C)
    CIAgent.log
    CAgent::EvaluateCIs CIAgent 24.01.2013 11:21:50 44 (0x002C)
    CIAgentJob({5BCCC0E4-C16C-4F1D-85A7-F62515232072}): CAgentJob::QueueEvent - Queueing event and incrementing semaphore Transition CIAgent 24.01.2013 11:21:50 44 (0x002C)
    CIAgentJob({5BCCC0E4-C16C-4F1D-85A7-F62515232072}): CAgentJob::HandleEvent(Event=Transition, CurrentState=Init) CIAgent 24.01.2013 11:21:50 1336 (0x0538)
    CIAgentJob({5BCCC0E4-C16C-4F1D-85A7-F62515232072}): Client requesting CIAgentJob context info for key: StateMessagePriority CIAgent 24.01.2013 11:21:50 1336 (0x0538)
    CIAgentJob({5BCCC0E4-C16C-4F1D-85A7-F62515232072}): TransitionState(From=Init, To=WaitingForAssignedCI) for Event=Transition CIAgent 24.01.2013 11:21:50 1336 (0x0538)
    CIAgentJob({5BCCC0E4-C16C-4F1D-85A7-F62515232072}): CAgentJob::QueueEvent - Queueing event and incrementing semaphore Transition CIAgent 24.01.2013 11:21:50 1336 (0x0538)
    CIAgentJob({5BCCC0E4-C16C-4F1D-85A7-F62515232072}): QueueDebug - Executing Event. CIAgent 24.01.2013 11:21:50 1336 (0x0538)
    CIAgentJob({5BCCC0E4-C16C-4F1D-85A7-F62515232072}): CAgentJob::HandleEvent(Event=Transition, CurrentState=WaitingForAssignedCI) CIAgent 24.01.2013 11:21:50 44 (0x002C)
    CIAgentJob({5BCCC0E4-C16C-4F1D-85A7-F62515232072}): CAgentJob::QueueEvent - Queueing event and incrementing semaphore DownloadCIs CIAgent 24.01.2013 11:21:50 44 (0x002C)
    CIAgentJob({5BCCC0E4-C16C-4F1D-85A7-F62515232072}): QueueDebug - Executing Event. CIAgent 24.01.2013 11:21:50 44 (0x002C)
    CIAgentJob({5BCCC0E4-C16C-4F1D-85A7-F62515232072}): CAgentJob::HandleEvent(Event=DownloadCIs, CurrentState=WaitingForAssignedCI) CIAgent 24.01.2013 11:21:50 1336 (0x0538)
    CIAgentJob({5BCCC0E4-C16C-4F1D-85A7-F62515232072}): TransitionState(From=WaitingForAssignedCI, To=DownloadingCIs) for Event=Transition CIAgent 24.01.2013 11:21:50 1336 (0x0538)
    CIAgentJob({5BCCC0E4-C16C-4F1D-85A7-F62515232072}): CAgentJob::QueueEvent - Queueing event and incrementing semaphore Transition CIAgent 24.01.2013 11:21:50 1336 (0x0538)
    CIAgentJob({5BCCC0E4-C16C-4F1D-85A7-F62515232072}): QueueDebug - Executing Event. CIAgent 24.01.2013 11:21:50 1336 (0x0538)
    CIAgentJob({5BCCC0E4-C16C-4F1D-85A7-F62515232072}): CAgentJob::HandleEvent(Event=Transition, CurrentState=DownloadingCIs) CIAgent 24.01.2013 11:21:50 44 (0x002C)
    CIAgentJob({5BCCC0E4-C16C-4F1D-85A7-F62515232072}): Client requesting CIAgentJob context info for key: PostRebootDetect CIAgent 24.01.2013 11:21:50 44 (0x002C)
    CIAgentJob({5BCCC0E4-C16C-4F1D-85A7-F62515232072}): Nothing to be downloaded. CIAgent 24.01.2013 11:21:50 44 (0x002C)
    CIAgentJob({5BCCC0E4-C16C-4F1D-85A7-F62515232072}): CAgentJob::QueueEvent - Queueing event and incrementing semaphore PersistCIs CIAgent 24.01.2013 11:21:50 44 (0x002C)
    CIAgentJob({5BCCC0E4-C16C-4F1D-85A7-F62515232072}): QueueDebug - Executing Event. CIAgent 24.01.2013 11:21:50 44 (0x002C)
    CIAgentJob({5BCCC0E4-C16C-4F1D-85A7-F62515232072}): CAgentJob::HandleEvent(Event=PersistCIs, CurrentState=DownloadingCIs) CIAgent 24.01.2013 11:21:50 1336 (0x0538)
    CIAgentJob({5BCCC0E4-C16C-4F1D-85A7-F62515232072}): TransitionState(From=DownloadingCIs, To=PersistingCIModels) for Event=Transition CIAgent 24.01.2013 11:21:50 1336 (0x0538)
    CIAgentJob({5BCCC0E4-C16C-4F1D-85A7-F62515232072}): CAgentJob::Execute [GlobalSemaphore] Trying to aquire global semaphore CIAgent 24.01.2013 11:21:50 1336 (0x0538)
    CIAgentJob({5BCCC0E4-C16C-4F1D-85A7-F62515232072}): CAgentJob::Execute [GlobalSemaphore] Queued for global semaphore acquisition. CIAgent 24.01.2013 11:21:50 1336 (0x0538)
    CIAgentJob({5BCCC0E4-C16C-4F1D-85A7-F62515232072}): GlobalJobEvent() called [GlobalSemaphore] CIAgent 24.01.2013 11:21:50 44 (0x002C)
    CIAgentJob({5BCCC0E4-C16C-4F1D-85A7-F62515232072}): CAgentJob::Execute [GlobalSemaphore] Acquired global semaphore. CIAgent 24.01.2013 11:21:50 44 (0x002C)
    CIAgentJob({5BCCC0E4-C16C-4F1D-85A7-F62515232072}): CAgentJob::HandleEvent(Event=Transition, CurrentState=PersistingCIModels) CIAgent 24.01.2013 11:21:50 44 (0x002C)
    CIAgentJob({5BCCC0E4-C16C-4F1D-85A7-F62515232072}): [JOB SCOPE] Failed to get digest for ScopeId_CF43FADB-8569-46DF-ADB2-984C3AA1E7B1/Application_0ddc3eb7-5ee3-41eb-9fed-646d28a06bcf:11. App policy ScopeId_CF43FADB-8569-46DF-ADB2-984C3AA1E7B1/RequiredApplication_0ddc3eb7-5ee3-41eb-9fed-646d28a06bcf:11 chain will not be included in evaluation. CIAgent 24.01.2013 11:21:50 44 (0x002C)
    CIAgentJob({5BCCC0E4-C16C-4F1D-85A7-F62515232072}): [JOB SCOPE] Failed to get digest for ScopeId_CF43FADB-8569-46DF-ADB2-984C3AA1E7B1/Application_0e9a8348-0ad5-44ee-bf81-82dfd44f0699:11. App policy ScopeId_CF43FADB-8569-46DF-ADB2-984C3AA1E7B1/RequiredApplication_0e9a8348-0ad5-44ee-bf81-82dfd44f0699:11 chain will not be included in evaluation. CIAgent 24.01.2013 11:21:50 44 (0x002C)
    CIAgentJob({5BCCC0E4-C16C-4F1D-85A7-F62515232072}): [JOB SCOPE] Failed to get digest for ScopeId_CF43FADB-8569-46DF-ADB2-984C3AA1E7B1/Application_10203df1-4fe4-49ef-8ab3-e8030e6a2cef:22. App policy ScopeId_CF43FADB-8569-46DF-ADB2-984C3AA1E7B1/RequiredApplication_10203df1-4fe4-49ef-8ab3-e8030e6a2cef:22 chain will not be included in evaluation. CIAgent 24.01.2013 11:21:50 44 (0x002C)
    CIAgentJob({5BCCC0E4-C16C-4F1D-85A7-F62515232072}): [JOB SCOPE] Failed to get digest for ScopeId_CF43FADB-8569-46DF-ADB2-984C3AA1E7B1/Application_1fc34d72-440d-4f6f-9a50-604e421f3c04:13. App policy ScopeId_CF43FADB-8569-46DF-ADB2-984C3AA1E7B1/RequiredApplication_1fc34d72-440d-4f6f-9a50-604e421f3c04:13 chain will not be included in evaluation. CIAgent 24.01.2013 11:21:50 44 (0x002C)
    CIAgentJob({5BCCC0E4-C16C-4F1D-85A7-F62515232072}): [JOB SCOPE] Failed to get dependency chain for App policy ScopeId_CF43FADB-8569-46DF-ADB2-984C3AA1E7B1/RequiredApplication_2191a582-1987-40fd-b8ec-cbee1a2ba590:4, will not be included in evaluation. CIAgent 24.01.2013 11:21:50 44 (0x002C)
    CIAgentJob({5BCCC0E4-C16C-4F1D-85A7-F62515232072}): [JOB SCOPE] Failed to get digest for ScopeId_CF43FADB-8569-46DF-ADB2-984C3AA1E7B1/Application_22778347-5967-4ee1-bdc0-3fce578b7ee1:2. App policy ScopeId_CF43FADB-8569-46DF-ADB2-984C3AA1E7B1/RequiredApplication_22778347-5967-4ee1-bdc0-3fce578b7ee1:2 chain will not be included in evaluation. CIAgent 24.01.2013 11:21:50 44 (0x002C)
    CIAgentJob({5BCCC0E4-C16C-4F1D-85A7-F62515232072}): [JOB SCOPE] Failed to get digest for ScopeId_CF43FADB-8569-46DF-ADB2-984C3AA1E7B1/Application_278d8ebe-16bc-49b7-a806-42025d921f84:6. App policy ScopeId_CF43FADB-8569-46DF-ADB2-984C3AA1E7B1/RequiredApplication_278d8ebe-16bc-49b7-a806-42025d921f84:6 chain will not be included in evaluation. CIAgent 24.01.2013 11:21:50 44 (0x002C)
    CIAgentJob({5BCCC0E4-C16C-4F1D-85A7-F62515232072}): [JOB SCOPE] Failed to get digest for ScopeId_CF43FADB-8569-46DF-ADB2-984C3AA1E7B1/Application_27c341d0-a38e-43c9-aeef-a82be7e1f664:1. App policy ScopeId_CF43FADB-8569-46DF-ADB2-984C3AA1E7B1/RequiredApplication_27c341d0-a38e-43c9-aeef-a82be7e1f664:1 chain will not be included in evaluation. CIAgent 24.01.2013 11:21:50 44 (0x002C)
    CIAgentJob({5BCCC0E4-C16C-4F1D-85A7-F62515232072}): [JOB SCOPE] Failed to get dependency chain for App policy ScopeId_CF43FADB-8569-46DF-ADB2-984C3AA1E7B1/RequiredApplication_2bf3a7d7-27fc-4fe6-80ff-80c9adee89a8:5, will not be included in evaluation. CIAgent 24.01.2013 11:21:50 44 (0x002C)
    CIAgentJob({5BCCC0E4-C16C-4F1D-85A7-F62515232072}): [JOB SCOPE] Failed to get digest for ScopeId_CF43FADB-8569-46DF-ADB2-984C3AA1E7B1/Application_33aa078b-9afa-48b3-9550-8d926c07721e:5. App policy ScopeId_CF43FADB-8569-46DF-ADB2-984C3AA1E7B1/RequiredApplication_33aa078b-9afa-48b3-9550-8d926c07721e:5 chain will not be included in evaluation. CIAgent 24.01.2013 11:21:50 44 (0x002C)
    CIAgentJob({5BCCC0E4-C16C-4F1D-85A7-F62515232072}): [JOB SCOPE] Failed to get dependency chain for App policy ScopeId_CF43FADB-8569-46DF-ADB2-984C3AA1E7B1/RequiredApplication_3a41042c-4feb-421b-8b55-42334654681e:15, will not be included in evaluation. CIAgent 24.01.2013 11:21:50 44 (0x002C)
    CIAgentJob({5BCCC0E4-C16C-4F1D-85A7-F62515232072}): [JOB SCOPE] Failed to get digest for ScopeId_CF43FADB-8569-46DF-ADB2-984C3AA1E7B1/Application_3be6a762-f993-4fe5-aca5-1989551d5a88:5. App policy ScopeId_CF43FADB-8569-46DF-ADB2-984C3AA1E7B1/RequiredApplication_3be6a762-f993-4fe5-aca5-1989551d5a88:5 chain will not be included in evaluation. CIAgent 24.01.2013 11:21:50 44 (0x002C)
    CIAgentJob({5BCCC0E4-C16C-4F1D-85A7-F62515232072}): [JOB SCOPE] Failed to get digest for ScopeId_CF43FADB-8569-46DF-ADB2-984C3AA1E7B1/Application_3c0b214a-2258-4765-be5d-d2a9fd754bc6:2. App policy ScopeId_CF43FADB-8569-46DF-ADB2-984C3AA1E7B1/RequiredApplication_3c0b214a-2258-4765-be5d-d2a9fd754bc6:2 chain will not be included in evaluation. CIAgent 24.01.2013 11:21:50 44 (0x002C)
    CIAgentJob({5BCCC0E4-C16C-4F1D-85A7-F62515232072}): [JOB SCOPE] Failed to get dependency chain for App policy ScopeId_CF43FADB-8569-46DF-ADB2-984C3AA1E7B1/RequiredApplication_46f5d091-992c-4e24-b0a2-3de657c0b8c7:16, will not be included in evaluation. CIAgent 24.01.2013 11:21:50 44 (0x002C)
    CIAgentJob({5BCCC0E4-C16C-4F1D-85A7-F62515232072}): [JOB SCOPE] Failed to get digest for ScopeId_CF43FADB-8569-46DF-ADB2-984C3AA1E7B1/Application_49337598-4c68-401e-8c39-a415288cd7d6:11. App policy ScopeId_CF43FADB-8569-46DF-ADB2-984C3AA1E7B1/RequiredApplication_49337598-4c68-401e-8c39-a415288cd7d6:11 chain will not be included in evaluation. CIAgent 24.01.2013 11:21:50 44 (0x002C)
    CIAgentJob({5BCCC0E4-C16C-4F1D-85A7-F62515232072}): [JOB SCOPE] Failed to get dependency chain for App policy ScopeId_CF43FADB-8569-46DF-ADB2-984C3AA1E7B1/RequiredApplication_4da67baa-ac51-4327-bfdc-c8f81781ae62:20, will not be included in evaluation. CIAgent 24.01.2013 11:21:50 44 (0x002C)
    CIAgentJob({5BCCC0E4-C16C-4F1D-85A7-F62515232072}): [JOB SCOPE] Failed to get digest for ScopeId_CF43FADB-8569-46DF-ADB2-984C3AA1E7B1/Application_4f0df4d7-e1d0-4717-b9e2-5f9cb6f1dd9b:8. App policy ScopeId_CF43FADB-8569-46DF-ADB2-984C3AA1E7B1/RequiredApplication_4f0df4d7-e1d0-4717-b9e2-5f9cb6f1dd9b:8 chain will not be included in evaluation. CIAgent 24.01.2013 11:21:50 44 (0x002C)
    CIAgentJob({5BCCC0E4-C16C-4F1D-85A7-F62515232072}): [JOB SCOPE] Failed to get digest for ScopeId_CF43FADB-8569-46DF-ADB2-984C3AA1E7B1/Application_5d895d54-10ea-447d-8b45-123b77e89721:4. App policy ScopeId_CF43FADB-8569-46DF-ADB2-984C3AA1E7B1/RequiredApplication_5d895d54-10ea-447d-8b45-123b77e89721:4 chain will not be included in evaluation. CIAgent 24.01.2013 11:21:50 44 (0x002C)
    CIAgentJob({5BCCC0E4-C16C-4F1D-85A7-F62515232072}): [JOB SCOPE] Failed to get digest for ScopeId_CF43FADB-8569-46DF-ADB2-984C3AA1E7B1/Application_636ad5b2-da09-439b-ac7c-d7895d728131:2. App policy ScopeId_CF43FADB-8569-46DF-ADB2-984C3AA1E7B1/RequiredApplication_636ad5b2-da09-439b-ac7c-d7895d728131:2 chain will not be included in evaluation. CIAgent 24.01.2013 11:21:50 44 (0x002C)
    CIAgentJob({5BCCC0E4-C16C-4F1D-85A7-F62515232072}): [JOB SCOPE] Failed to get digest for ScopeId_CF43FADB-8569-46DF-ADB2-984C3AA1E7B1/Application_665c56e0-626a-4d8d-9378-48a8c8546846:1. App policy ScopeId_CF43FADB-8569-46DF-ADB2-984C3AA1E7B1/RequiredApplication_665c56e0-626a-4d8d-9378-48a8c8546846:1 chain will not be included in evaluation. CIAgent 24.01.2013 11:21:50 44 (0x002C)
    CIAgentJob({5BCCC0E4-C16C-4F1D-85A7-F62515232072}): [JOB SCOPE] Failed to get digest for ScopeId_CF43FADB-8569-46DF-ADB2-984C3AA1E7B1/Application_666d662e-66f7-4e53-b4fd-06ccd55239bf:4. App policy ScopeId_CF43FADB-8569-46DF-ADB2-984C3AA1E7B1/RequiredApplication_666d662e-66f7-4e53-b4fd-06ccd55239bf:4 chain will not be included in evaluation. CIAgent 24.01.2013 11:21:50 44 (0x002C)
    CIAgentJob({5BCCC0E4-C16C-4F1D-85A7-F62515232072}): [JOB SCOPE] Failed to get digest for ScopeId_CF43FADB-8569-46DF-ADB2-984C3AA1E7B1/Application_6a39d117-9e22-4e11-8fcd-ebbf35b00688:3. App policy ScopeId_CF43FADB-8569-46DF-ADB2-984C3AA1E7B1/RequiredApplication_6a39d117-9e22-4e11-8fcd-ebbf35b00688:3 chain will not be included in evaluation. CIAgent 24.01.2013 11:21:50 44 (0x002C)
    CIAgentJob({5BCCC0E4-C16C-4F1D-85A7-F62515232072}): [JOB SCOPE] Failed to get digest for ScopeId_CF43FADB-8569-46DF-ADB2-984C3AA1E7B1/Application_6da53bf1-ab56-4a96-9af8-6df6d4b9972e:10. App policy ScopeId_CF43FADB-8569-46DF-ADB2-984C3AA1E7B1/RequiredApplication_6da53bf1-ab56-4a96-9af8-6df6d4b9972e:10 chain will not be included in evaluation. CIAgent 24.01.2013 11:21:50 44 (0x002C)
    CIAgentJob({5BCCC0E4-C16C-4F1D-85A7-F62515232072}): [JOB SCOPE] Failed to get digest for ScopeId_CF43FADB-8569-46DF-ADB2-984C3AA1E7B1/Application_70d0451a-94c0-4372-b19b-dd9e4246788f:3. App policy ScopeId_CF43FADB-8569-46DF-ADB2-984C3AA1E7B1/RequiredApplication_70d0451a-94c0-4372-b19b-dd9e4246788f:3 chain will not be included in evaluation. CIAgent 24.01.2013 11:21:50 44 (0x002C)
    CIAgentJob({5BCCC0E4-C16C-4F1D-85A7-F62515232072}): [JOB SCOPE] Failed to get digest for ScopeId_CF43FADB-8569-46DF-ADB2-984C3AA1E7B1/Application_716e6646-2efd-4d3a-9441-5563de429a01:3. App policy ScopeId_CF43FADB-8569-46DF-ADB2-984C3AA1E7B1/RequiredApplication_716e6646-2efd-4d3a-9441-5563de429a01:3 chain will not be included in evaluation. CIAgent 24.01.2013 11:21:50 44 (0x002C)
    CIAgentJob({5BCCC0E4-C16C-4F1D-85A7-F62515232072}): [JOB SCOPE] Failed to get dependency chain for App policy ScopeId_CF43FADB-8569-46DF-ADB2-984C3AA1E7B1/RequiredApplication_77493905-3008-4862-bd89-d5fad3318cfc:41, will not be included in evaluation. CIAgent 24.01.2013 11:21:50 44 (0x002C)
    CIAgentJob({5BCCC0E4-C16C-4F1D-85A7-F62515232072}): [JOB SCOPE] Failed to get digest for ScopeId_CF43FADB-8569-46DF-ADB2-984C3AA1E7B1/Application_77c479ff-bef7-456d-9bae-47ea1513e56f:4. App policy ScopeId_CF43FADB-8569-46DF-ADB2-984C3AA1E7B1/RequiredApplication_77c479ff-bef7-456d-9bae-47ea1513e56f:4 chain will not be included in evaluation. CIAgent 24.01.2013 11:21:51 44 (0x002C)
    CIAgentJob({5BCCC0E4-C16C-4F1D-85A7-F62515232072}): [JOB SCOPE] Failed to get digest for ScopeId_CF43FADB-8569-46DF-ADB2-984C3AA1E7B1/Application_7925a429-49b4-4b04-8094-4987ca70a35b:7. App policy ScopeId_CF43FADB-8569-46DF-ADB2-984C3AA1E7B1/RequiredApplication_7925a429-49b4-4b04-8094-4987ca70a35b:7 chain will not be included in evaluation. CIAgent 24.01.2013 11:21:51 44 (0x002C)
    CIAgentJob({5BCCC0E4-C16C-4F1D-85A7-F62515232072}): [JOB SCOPE] Failed to get digest for ScopeId_CF43FADB-8569-46DF-ADB2-984C3AA1E7B1/Application_79516c6a-a815-4c31-99fe-9ab4e4024e4e:1. App policy ScopeId_CF43FADB-8569-46DF-ADB2-984C3AA1E7B1/RequiredApplication_79516c6a-a815-4c31-99fe-9ab4e4024e4e:1 chain will not be included in evaluation. CIAgent 24.01.2013 11:21:51 44 (0x002C)
    CIAgentJob({5BCCC0E4-C16C-4F1D-85A7-F62515232072}): [JOB SCOPE] Failed to get digest for ScopeId_CF43FADB-8569-46DF-ADB2-984C3AA1E7B1/Application_7af21e61-ffe4-4791-85ba-86d83cc9cf31:3. App policy ScopeId_CF43FADB-8569-46DF-ADB2-984C3AA1E7B1/RequiredApplication_7af21e61-ffe4-4791-85ba-86d83cc9cf31:3 chain will not be included in evaluation. CIAgent 24.01.2013 11:21:51 44 (0x002C)
    CIAgentJob({5BCCC0E4-C16C-4F1D-85A7-F62515232072}): [JOB SCOPE] Failed to get digest for ScopeId_CF43FADB-8569-46DF-ADB2-984C3AA1E7B1/Application_7d5204c1-26e4-489e-addb-1401d965153f:8. App policy ScopeId_CF43FADB-8569-46DF-ADB2-984C3AA1E7B1/RequiredApplication_7d5204c1-26e4-489e-addb-1401d965153f:8 chain will not be included in evaluation. CIAgent 24.01.2013 11:21:51 44 (0x002C)
    CIAgentJob({5BCCC0E4-C16C-4F1D-85A7-F62515232072}): [JOB SCOPE] Failed to get digest for ScopeId_CF43FADB-8569-46DF-ADB2-984C3AA1E7B1/Application_7e5660da-b7c7-49dd-8940-7c751389f61a:3. App policy ScopeId_CF43FADB-8569-46DF-ADB2-984C3AA1E7B1/RequiredApplication_7e5660da-b7c7-49dd-8940-7c751389f61a:3 chain will not be included in evaluation. CIAgent 24.01.2013 11:21:51 44 (0x002C)
    CIAgentJob({5BCCC0E4-C16C-4F1D-85A7-F62515232072}): [JOB SCOPE] Failed to get digest for ScopeId_CF43FADB-8569-46DF-ADB2-984C3AA1E7B1/Application_85f4af90-a3f1-4d7e-bb6a-b079c20fa2d5:14. App policy ScopeId_CF43FADB-8569-46DF-ADB2-984C3AA1E7B1/RequiredApplication_85f4af90-a3f1-4d7e-bb6a-b079c20fa2d5:14 chain will not be included in evaluation. CIAgent 24.01.2013 11:21:51 44 (0x002C)
    CIAgentJob({5BCCC0E4-C16C-4F1D-85A7-F62515232072}): [JOB SCOPE] Failed to get digest for ScopeId_CF43FADB-8569-46DF-ADB2-984C3AA1E7B1/Application_8908c4aa-5c4e-41fd-a111-e4be0780e6bb:2. App policy ScopeId_CF43FADB-8569-46DF-ADB2-984C3AA1E7B1/
    Is it possible to reset Software Center?

    This bug is still present in SCCM 2012 R2 CU3.
    Remediation script has been optimized and written in Powershell. It will trigger a refresh only if application is found in WMI class.
    If you deploy user-centric applications, you’ll need to change this code a little bit.
    # Machine
    $ErrorActionPreference = "Stop"
    try {
        [int]$countMissingDTs = 0
        $Applications = Get-WmiObject -namespace root\ccm\clientsdk -query "select * from ccm_application"
        $AppsTotal = $Applications.Length
        $missingIds = @()
        foreach($App in $Applications) {
            $AppDT = [wmi] $App.__Path
            if($AppDT.AppDTs.Name.Length -eq 0) {
                #Write-Host $($App.Id)
                $missingIds += $App.Id
                $countMissingDTs = $countMissingDTs + 1
        #Write-Host $countMissingDTs
        if ($countMissingDTs -gt 0) {
            foreach ($appId in $missingIds) {
                $assignments = Get-WmiObject -query "select AssignmentName, AssignmentId, AssignedCIs from CCM_ApplicationCIAssignment" -namespace "ROOT\ccm\policy\Machine"
                if ($assignments -ne $null) {
                    foreach ($assignment in $assignments) {
                        $assignedCI = $assignment.AssignedCIs[0]
                        #write-host "Processing Assignment $($assignment.AssignmentName) $($assignment.AssignmentId) $($assignedCI.CI.ID)"
                        $assignedCISplit = $assignedCI.CI.ID.Split("/")
                        #Write-Host $($assignedCISplit[0]+"/"+$assignedCISplit[1].replace("RequiredApplication", "Application"))
                        if ($($assignedCISplit[0]+"/"+$assignedCISplit[1].replace("RequiredApplication", "Application")) -eq $appId) {
                            #write-host "Processing Assignment $($assignment.AssignmentName) $($assignment.AssignmentId)"
                            $sched=([wmi]"root\ccm\Policy\machine\ActualConfig:CCM_Scheduler_ScheduledMessage.ScheduledMessageID='$($assignment.AssignmentId)'");
                            $sched.Triggers=@('SimpleInterval;Minutes=1;MaxRandomDelayMinutes=0');
                            $null = $sched.Put()
                            sleep -milliseconds 3000
                        } else {
                            #Write-Host "Skip assignment $($assignment.AssignmentName)"
                } else {
                    #Write-Host "$appId not found"
    } catch {
        #Write-Host $_.Exception
        return $false
    return $true
    User-centric application deployment:
    # User
    $ErrorActionPreference = "Stop"
    try {
        [int]$countMissingDTs = 0
        $Applications = Get-WmiObject -namespace root\ccm\clientsdk -query "select * from ccm_application"
        $AppsTotal = $Applications.Length
        $missingIds = @()
        foreach($App in $Applications) {
            $AppDT = [wmi] $App.__Path
            if($AppDT.AppDTs.Name.Length -eq 0) {
                #Write-Host $($App.Id)
                $missingIds += $App.Id
                $countMissingDTs = $countMissingDTs + 1
        #Write-Host $countMissingDTs
        if ($countMissingDTs -gt 0) {
            foreach ($appId in $missingIds) {
                $sidObjs = ( get-wmiobject -query "SELECT UserSID FROM CCM_UserLogonEvents WHERE LogoffTime = NULL" -namespace "ROOT\ccm")
                if ($sidObjs -ne $null) {
                    foreach ($sidObj in $sidObjs) {
                        $sid = $sidObj.UserSID.replace('-','_');
                        $assignments = Get-WmiObject -query "select AssignmentName, AssignmentId, AssignedCIs from CCM_ApplicationCIAssignment" -namespace "ROOT\ccm\policy\$($sid)"
                        if ($assignments -ne $null) {
                            foreach ($assignment in $assignments) {
                                $assignedCI = $assignment.AssignedCIs[0]
                                #write-host "Processing Assignment $($assignment.AssignmentName) $($assignment.AssignmentId) $($assignedCI.CI.ID)"
                                $assignedCISplit = $assignedCI.CI.ID.Split("/")
                                #Write-Host $($assignedCISplit[0]+"/"+$assignedCISplit[1].replace("RequiredApplication", "Application"))
                                if ($($assignedCISplit[0]+"/"+$assignedCISplit[1].replace("RequiredApplication", "Application")) -eq $appId) {
                                    #write-host "Processing Assignment $($assignment.AssignmentName) $($assignment.AssignmentId)"
                                    $sched=([wmi]"root\ccm\Policy\$sid\ActualConfig:CCM_Scheduler_ScheduledMessage.ScheduledMessageID='$($assignment.AssignmentId)'");
                                    $sched.Triggers=@('SimpleInterval;Minutes=1;MaxRandomDelayMinutes=0');
                                    $sched.Put()
                                    sleep -milliseconds 3000
                } else {
                    # Write-Host "$appId not found"
    } catch {
        # Write-Host $_.Exception
        return $false
    return $true

  • Software Center Application Uninstallation Button Greyed Out and Deploying an Application with Uninstall switch Fails

    Hi,
    I tried everything I could find on the internet but no luck so far. I can successfully deploy MS Visio 2013 to the clients. I also want to be able to uninstall it from the clients. On the client machine Uninstall button is greyed out. This deployment is
    installed as "Available" and there is only one deployment type within that MS Visio 2013 Application.
    I tried the following uninstall commands in my deployment:
    setup.exe /uninstall
    setup.exe /uninstall
    VisPro
    /config .\vispro.ww\uninstallvisio.xml
    “\\SRVSCCM2012\Sources\MSApplications\MSVisioPro_2013_64Bit_ENG\setup.exe” /uninstall VisPro /config "\\SRVSCCM2012\Sources\MSApplications\MSVisioPro_2013_64Bit_ENG\vispro.ww\uninstallvisio.xml"
    \\SRVSCCM2012\Sources\MSApplications\MSVisioPro_2013_64Bit_ENG\setup.exe /uninstall VisPro /config \\SRVSCCM2012\Sources\MSApplications\MSVisioPro_2013_64Bit_ENG\vispro.ww\uninstallvisio.xml
    I checked Product ID from Setup.xml and I know it is correct. My uninstallvisio.xml' content is below:
    <Configuration Product="VisPro">
    <Display Level="basic" CompletionNotice="yes" SuppressModal="yes" AcceptEula="yes" />
    <Setting Id="SETUP_REBOOT" Value="Never" />
    </Configuration>
    Last night, I downloaded and installed Cumulative Update 1 for SCCM 2012 R2 and I haven't tried the deployment after the update,yet. I will try it today but please let me know what else to check.
    Yavuz Selim Atmaca

    After I updated SCCM Server and test client pc with CU1 , I tried to deploy visio as Required. It installed successfully. Then I uninstalled visio by deploying the application with Uninstall Action.
    After that I tried to deploy visio as "Available" to see if Software Center Uninstall button works. However visio deployment does not come to Software Center's Available Applications List. I check the status of the deployment under the Deployments monitoring
    node and it says Success "Already Compliant". I dont know what it means. Does config manager thinks that visio already installed?
    Yavuz Selim Atmaca
    2 or 3 hours later that -Succes "Already Compliant"- status of the deployment under the Deployments monitoring node is vanished automatically and Software Center application list showed the new deployment. I installed it and  uninstalled it succesfully.
    So, you are right Solution is the CU1 but I am still wondering why my available deployment took so time to be visible in Software Center althought I didn't enter any schedule to be available.
    Yavuz Selim Atmaca

  • Orphaned Applications in software center

    I have seen this a few times but seems to be intermittent.  I created a query based user collection.  My test user account was part of that collection.  I deployed an app to the collection.  The user was able to see it in the app catalog
    and install it successfully.  The user then uninstalled the app successfully.  The app stills shows in Software Center as available (which appears to be normal although I wish the behavior would be that it would disappear).  But that's not the
    issue.  So I no longer wanted the user to be able to deploy this application that they previously installed and uninstalled.  Since it is a query based collection which the user should be in, I added an exclude collection that just had the user account
    in it  which seemed to work fine.  The exclusion collection caused my test user account to drop out of the collection.  After a few minutes, the app dropped out of the app catalog which is good and what I expected.  The problem here is
    that the app still remains in Software Center and shows as available and the user can still continue to install and uninstall this app.  I have forced user policy several times with no change and let it sit for a few hours with still no change.  As
    a test I then removed all membership from the collection so that it was completely empty.  Still no change.  I then deleted the collection and the deployment and still no change.  I have also forced machine policy and application deployment
    evaluation cycles and still no change. I have ensured that there are no other deployments of this app, it is not a dependent app of any other app either.  So I am left with an app that I can still install/uninstall from software center with no existing
    deployments of that app.  Other times I have done similar and the app does disappear from Software Center after updating user policy.  But definitely once or twice in the past I have seen this behavior as well.  In the past I believe I removed
    and re-installed the configmgr client to get rid of the orphaned apps.  I have not done that yet this time in the hopes of troubleshooting further.  Has anyone ran into anything like this? 

    Thanks, but I am the person that originally posted that issue.  This issue is similar but much worse.  That one was just a nuisance in that the apps remain available in software center after you have performed an uninstall.  But to workaround
    that problem I would have to somehow get the user out of the collection that was targeted with the deployment and that usually got the app to drop out of software center.  In this case however, the app remains even after deleting the collection and the
    deployment.  So this app is no longer deployed to anyone but the user with the app orphaned in software center can still install and uninstall it.  I even cleared the cache on the user machine thinking that would at least cause it to fail to install
    next time but the user was able to re-download content and install again.  So to me this one is much more serious than the first one.  I will have to file another case.  But curious if anyone else has seen this and for now if anyone has a workaround
    like perhaps finding the policy and deleting it or something that I can script.  Just started poking through policy spy but have not gotten far yet.

  • Unable to advertise software application via Software Center

    I have an issue of advertising my software application via software center. I doesn't matter if I set it to deploy as Required or Available, the deployment just could not get to install to my targeted machine or appear in my Software Center. In the
    deployment status, it also shows No Status even I have targeted since last week and the targeted machine is always connected.
    I have viewed the execmgr.log, but could not find the package id in the log. Could it be stuck somewhere that could cause it unable to complete the process of advertising it to the targeted machine, whether it is via Required or Available deployment?
    I am however able to deploy old/new the patch updates deployment and able to install the software package to my DP. However im still able to get OLD deployment of software apps or TS but not
    NEW deployment of any software apps or TS since the last 2 weeks. I am also able to mplist and mpcert from the targeted machine to my MP, so meaning it could communicate to get policies.
    Im stuck now. Any other logs in particular that could help me right now to determine the root cause?

    There is a constant error of
    1) CPolicySource::UpdateSoftwarePolicy: Failed to retrieve version for policy DEP-DE420076-DE4001C2-22DFAA8D from the Policy table
    2) Failed to update policy DEP-DE420076-DE4001C2-22DFAA8D and policy assignment {ecadc449-d862-4ad9-b75e-252d753ced8f} based on package DE4001C2, program Install (TS DC_Demo) and offer D
    3) CPolicySource::UpdateSoftwarePolicy: Failed to retrieve version for policy DEP-DE420081-DE4001C2-22DFAA8D from the Policy table
    4) Failed to update policy DEP-DE420081-DE4001C2-22DFAA8D and policy assignment {43af1ebc-32b5-459b-8749-573a87df22b8} based on package DE4001C2, program Install (TS DC_Demo) and offer D
    5) CPolicySource::UpdateSoftwarePolicy: Failed to retrieve version for policy DEP-DE420076-DE4001C2-01D4CDDC from the Policy table
    6) Failed to update policy DEP-DE420076-DE4001C2-01D4CDDC and policy assignment {f4041e0f-da02-4c6e-8a25-62e95a123abb} based on package DE4001C2, program Install (TS HR_FI) and offer D
    7) CPolicySource::UpdateSoftwarePolicy: Failed to retrieve version for policy DEP-DE420081-DE4001C2-01D4CDDC from the Policy table
    8) Failed to update policy DEP-DE420081-DE4001C2-01D4CDDC and policy assignment {d7884252-9e8b-4854-b175-a0c797130930} based on package DE4001C2, program Install (TS HR_FI) and offer D
    9) Failed to create policy and policy assignment based on package DE4003E6, program Install (TS) and offer DE420076
    10) Failed to create policy and policy assignment based on package DE4003E7, program Install (TS) and offer DE420076
    I don't understand why it keeps on saying "based on package DE4001C2". I don't have any package with this package ID.... Not sure why I am seeing this in my logs.

  • Applications with two deployment types makes uninstall button in software center "greyed" out.

    Hi
    SCCM 2012 R2 running on Windows server 2012 with Windows 7 clients.
    We are publishing applications to users that are available (not required), so that they can be downloaded from the application catalog web site. We have som applications that needs more then one deployment type (different pre requirements depending
    on OS architecture) and when I create two deployment types for one Application the uninstall button in Software center is greyed out? If i remove one of the deployment types so there is just one, well then the Uninstall button is available again.
    An example is Itunes. I publish one Itunes application to the store that has two deployment types, one for X86 and another for X64 with requirments on OS architetcure. the correct version gets installed but the uninstall button is not possible to use. If
    i remove one of the deployment types then the deployment button is not greyed out.
    Is this a bug?
    Thanks everyone. 

    We will be installing CU3 this Friday. During the next week or so, I will deploy the CU3 client to the workstations.
    I do not believe that the uninstall button issue will be addressed with this update either, according to what I have read so far.
    If, by some small yet profound miracle, my uninstall button regains full functionality, I will gladly let all of you know.
    I would hope that Microsoft would address this issue seriously, as I am sure the rumblings of dissatisfaction are beginning to grow louder with each passing CU that ignores the problem.

  • I downloaded the adobe XI software and it shows in my Adobe download assistant as downloaded but I can not open it and it is not a part of my applications. Very frustrating download process as I just want to convert a PDF file to an editable word document

    I downloaded the adobe XI software and it shows in my Adobe download assistant as downloaded but I can not open it and it is not a part of my applications. Very frustrating download process as I just want to convert a PDF file to an editable word document...

    Odonnells52 you will still need to install Adobe Acrobat Professional prior to being able to make edits to PDF or utilize Acrobat.   By default the installation files have been saved to your download folder.
    If you continue to face difficulties with the Adobe Download Assistant then please see Troubleshoot Adobe Download Assistant.
    You can also download the installation files directly from Download Acrobat products | Standard, Pro | XI, X if you are unable to locate the downloaded installation files.

  • 0x87D01280 "Virtual application is currently in use" error when uninstall App-V Office 2013 in Software Center

    Getting the above error message when attempting to uninstall Office 2013 App-V version (downloaded using ODT) in Software Center. There are no office 2013 or App-V processes showing as running in Task Manager. Nothing in event viewer to show what is running
    either. Any idea on what could be running and holding the uninstall from completing?

    Hello,
    These issues are caused if the virtual package is used during the attempt to uninstall.
    SFTMIME is a legacy command-line interface for App-V 4.6, not supported for usage with App-V 5 (which is the only version that supports Office 2013).
    App-V 5.0 SP2 has introduced the ability to divert required actions to next logoff / reboot depending on publishing, if the package is in use.
    See these articles;
    http://www.applepie.se/app-v-5-0-sp2-and-pending-removal-update
    http://blogs.technet.com/b/virtualvibes/archive/2013/12/03/pending-tasks-in-app-v-5-0-sp2.aspx
    Nicke Källén | The Knack| Twitter:
    @Znackattack

Maybe you are looking for

  • How can I retrieve my pages documents from another account in the iCloud

    I was using pages in my ipad. Then I bought a Mac Pro and signes with a new iCloud account. In order to sync it with my ipad I deleite the previous iCloud account from the divise and started it with the new account. I previously choose to keep all th

  • Business Transactions and Document type

    Hi eXperts ! Can anyone please explain these business transactions like when they are created, what is the document type related to these and which one should I use to see the Amount paid to the Vendor (Actual Payment) KOAE     Actual Settlement CO E

  • Express 8 on a G5 Dual 2.0,  7 gigs Ram, TIger

    I'm considering purchasing Express 8 to use on my G5..dual 2.0, 7 gigs RAM in Tiger 10.4.11. Currently using an Alesis io 14 interface without any problems into Cubase LE 4 Was wondering if anyone can provide some input as to performance issues? I've

  • Send and reply suddenly are very slow

    When I hit reply or send new message I get a spinning ball for several minutes before the new window to reply appears. Mail used to work rapidly and well for me, but in the last few days it has slowed to an unusable crawl. Any fixes?

  • Spawning another java process after System.exit(0);

    Hi everyone I have an application that Im trying to test. Unfortunately one of these tests requires me to spawn another java process after a System.exit(0); has executed. Since this exits the VM its proving very difficult. Does anyone know of a way t