Apply Smart object transformation to other layers

Is there a way to get the current transformation used on a Smart Object layer (scale/skew/rotat/perspective/warp/etc.), to allow applying it to other layer(s)? I've looked through the Javascript reference, and I haven't found anything that appears to allow this.

Thanks, that's what I thought. I have many scenarios which need this, and it's a real annoyance that it doesn't seem possible. Somewhere in the file are the coordinates and specs which are controlling the transformation, and no way to access them
Among the needs I have, I work with people who seem to think of Smart Objects as if they are folders - I sometimes have to dig thorugh 5 or 6 layers of smart objects to get to what needs editing, and at least one occasion, Photoshop has crashed as I was trying to save my way back to the original document, losing the changes that I had made. I was hoping to be able to make a script which would open the Smart Object, bring the layers therein into the current document and apply the same transformations. This would save me a LOT of time fixing these messy files. It would also allow me to match an existing Smart Object layer to different Smart Object layer. I sometimes need to do this, as I occasionally edit one smart object only to find that several others which are the same graphic, are actually separate Smart Objects.
Oh, well. Maybe CS6. ...or CS7... or...
Thanks again.

Similar Messages

  • Smart Object Transformation in CS5

    Has anyone noticed that when you scale down a smart object in Photoshop CS5, the transformation tool resets the dimensions to 100%? In CS4, you are able to see the transformation properties once you scale down (by option-Shift clicking on the bounding box). It would be helpful to retain the scaled dimensions of the transformed smart object in case you need to import other smart objects to rescale.

    Thanks. Here's a link to the video of me transforming in CS5:
    http://www.notchill.com/tmp/CS5_SmartObject_Transform.mov
    Please note: The smart object I imported was already scaled down from the original size, but the transform controls show it as 100%.
    In contrast, here is a screen cap of me doing the exact same process in CS4:
    http://www.notchill.com/tmp/CS4_SmartObject_Transform.mov
    As you can see, once I get into transform mode, it shows that the smart object has been scaled from its original. This data is very valuable.
    Hope this helps to clarify. Please note this applies to rotation as well.

  • How to copy a smart object transform in Photoshop

    Hello!
    Smart objects in photoshop is realy powerfull tool, i use it  in many different ways and create complicated web graphic. But many times i need to do one thing with them and always fail:
    If i have several different smart objects, and I do DIFFERENT  perspective transform to them (it means scaling distortion rotation etc)
    how can i apply the *same* transform that has one of my objects to another one smart objet that yet has no transformation (or it has some alrady dosn't matter)?
    In other words how can i copy the transformation in some way (as you might copy a layer style and apply the same one to a different layer)
    Is there any way? or i shoud look to scripting to do that?
    Is there real photoshop guru who knows how to do that?
    thanks in advance

    Thank you!
    Yes i know about this workaround but unfortunatly there will be immediatly other question raised :
    if i do this (replace content of my new smart object created by copying from original) then this new smart object will be disconnected from any other smart object, and there is no way how to restore this connection betwen smart objects after content replace operation. Or there is?
    This is important  for me cause in my work i have a lot of smart objects with different transformations but conneted to one source data object.
    So unfortunatly for me but this idea is not even workaround for my workflow? It's so pity

  • Smart objects transform&duplicate again

    I am on a windows xp system and using the ps cs3 extended 10.0.1 version.
    My question is about smart objects and their transformation capabilities.
    I have made some tests on 3 objects. I have created a vector object applied basic layer styles(shipped with photoshop) and duplicate it twice. Rasterized duplicated ones. Converted vector original and one of duplicated raster copy to smart object and leave one of the raster copy as normal object. Objects have given the same size information in the info palette. Aligned them vertically using a grid.
    I have tried some possibilities i have used ctrl+alt+T command transform and duplicate on one of the smart object. It was not working. So i have tried ctrl+shift+alt+T it was not working properly too.
    I have applied ctrl+alt+T to normal raster object to create a reference transformation it was working. But when i apply ctrl+alt+shift+T command to vector and raster smart object. I realized that command transforms duplicated copies completely different than the reference transformation applied to normal object.
    is it a bug or a normal behavior .

    I am on a windows xp system and using the ps cs3 extended 10.0.1 version.
    My question is about smart objects and their transformation capabilities.
    I have made some tests on 3 objects. I have created a vector object applied basic layer styles(shipped with photoshop) and duplicate it twice. Rasterized duplicated ones. Converted vector original and one of duplicated raster copy to smart object and leave one of the raster copy as normal object. Objects have given the same size information in the info palette. Aligned them vertically using a grid.
    I have tried some possibilities i have used ctrl+alt+T command transform and duplicate on one of the smart object. It was not working. So i have tried ctrl+shift+alt+T it was not working properly too.
    I have applied ctrl+alt+T to normal raster object to create a reference transformation it was working. But when i apply ctrl+alt+shift+T command to vector and raster smart object. I realized that command transforms duplicated copies completely different than the reference transformation applied to normal object.
    is it a bug or a normal behavior .

  • How do you apply the same transformation to multiple layers?

    I've been using PS for years and never had to do this before.
    I have a 3D image of a tradeshow exhibit and I want to drop in a lot of different mocks for backgrounds. The 3D is in a slight perspective and I need to transform all the mocks to fit that space.
    So how do I link my backgrounds and apply the same "skew" or free transform to all of the layers?
    PS version CC 14.2.1 x64

    What exactly am I alt+dragging?
    My mistake.  I was thinking about filters and alt-dragging them to a new layer.  For a transform, you most likely will want to make one master SO, apply the transformation, then make duplicates via copy from the layer flyout menu.  Then you can replace the content with the other layers.

  • How do I convert my smart object back into the layers I made it from?

    I was working with 100 layers or so and i converted it to a smart object to work with easier.  However some of the layers and layer modes don't interact properly with the background that is separate from the smart object.  There doesn't seem to be an option to release layers within the smart object.  I attempted to solve the problem by dragging the layers from the smart object editable file but it didn't line up within the original file...extremely frustrating.  Any solutions? PS6 BETA Lion OSX

    It was created inside the file.  They were differnt dimensions though because the layers selected to become a smart object had different bounds beyond the canvas.
    The issue was that once I dragged layers from the editable file that was the smart object I would attempt to realign them BUT I have so many adjustments with masks that we'ren't linked so they wouldn't move with my realignment move(even a control+t)...I ended up going back in and relinking them all(which took really long) in order to realign things. 
    But really it would be so much easier if i could have just clicked re-add layers to file or something.
    No problem Howard, thanks anyway.

  • Can't warp pasted AI vector Smart Object using Free Transform in PS CS6

    Hi
    I pasted a vector object into PS CS6 (13.0.1 x32) today directly from Illustrator CS6 (16.0.1 x32), and selected "Paste as Smart Object" (Windows XP Pro SP3).
    I then tried to warp the pasted object using the Free Transform tool by dragging one of the corner handles with CTRL held down (Windows).
    This usually warps\distorts the object, but instead, this launched a skew operation.
    If I paste as Shape Layer or as Pixels then apply Free Transform, <Ctrl + corner handle drag> performs a warp\distort operation.
    Also, if I rasterise the pasted AI object, and then convert to a Smart Object I can warp\distort.
    Is it not possible to paste an Illustrator vector in as a Smart Object, and then warp\distort it directly using this technique?
    Thanks for your help.
    Richard

    Your right in that on a pasted vector smart one can't warp, distort or perform perspective transforms.
    One workaround would be to right click on the vector smart object layer in the layers panel and
    choose convert to smart object.
    It depends on what your object is, but you'd probably get better quality from a pasted shape or path, but then you won't be able to open the object
    back in illustrator from photoshop.

  • Edits to a JPG Smart Object  in a layered TIFF file:  DOES NOT Save to the originally placed file?

    When placing a JPG as a Smart Object (and even multiples) into a layered TIFF file:  If I open each layered Smart Object JPG, make changes as a JPG and SAVE the file, I expect the ORIGINAL SOURCE JPG file that was placed to also be saved- I thought that is the file I was editing!
    This SUCKS!  To capture my edits to the original individual files:  I now have to open each layed TIF file, Edit each smart object JPG and SAVE AS to overwrite the original and capture my changes?  Is this the way its always been- I don't think it has.  How can I edit a Smart Object file in a layered document and ALSO update the SOURCE file?

    You should edit the original jpg, and then replace the smart object. There is a utility that makes this easier, if you do many of these. Looks liek this
    link_update.zip

  • Convert multiple layers into separate smart objects

    I have multiple layers in a document that I want to make into separate smart objects.
    If I select them and choose "convert to smart object" in the Layers Panel fly out, it flattens the layers into 1 smart object.
    Can it be done, or do I need to make each layer a smart object one at a time.
    OR... let me back up
    I have several files in Bridge, I want to "load into Photoshop layers" using the TOOLS > Batch Command BUT have each file load as a smart object.
    Either way would be great!

    While these don't use the batch command, take a look at
    from within photoshop, File>Scripts>Load Files into Stack.
    For bridge try Dr. Browns Services:
    http://www.russellbrown.com/scripts.html
    If you have cs5, you can drag files from mini bridge into an existing
    photoshop document, for smart object layers, provided you have
    your preferences under general to place or drag raster images as smart objects.
    MTSTUNER

  • Can I change what layer is used to name a Smart Object?

    I really love smart objects, and in particular I appreciate being able to combine a layer and its adjustment layers into a single smart object. However, when I create smart objects from multiple layers this way, I end up with names like "Hue/Saturation 31" and "Curves 16". Is there a way to set Photoshop to name the smart objects based on the primary layer, so I don't lose the layer names that actually indicate what's in the smart object?
    For example, I do a lot of editing and combining groups of "selfies" that people send me. Once I extract them from their backgrounds, I bring them into a single file, with each "selfie" named with the name of the person pictured. So, for example, I'd have a Jane Doe layer, a John Smith layer, etc. Then I add adjustment layers to each one, to match their exposure and color as much as possible. Then, if any of the adjustment layers are not applied evenly to the entire smart object, I combine the smart object and its adjustment layers into a new smart object, so I can move and scale it easily without messing up the alignment of the combined layers. However, then I have to go back to the original files to know who is who.
    Smart objects work much better than linked layers, but all the extra steps necessary to re-name them are driving me nuts. Does anyone have a solution?
    Paula

    When I know i'll be transforming or adding additional filters, I prefer to go directly to creating smart objects rather than grouping them first, since the relevant layers are automatically "grouped" by being pulled into the smart object. My thought is that the default name for a smart object (or a group, for that matter) should be the lowest layer on the selected stack that has a non-default name, since in most cases that's the one you'd want to use for the new smart object. I don't know exactly how Photoshop recognizes layer names, but since it knows what number to assign to new layers or individual types of adjustment layers, it should also be able to recognize when a layer name is not a default name.

  • Smart Objects Problem : Templates : CS3 : WIN

    Hello,
    I am trying to create some reusable templates in Photoshop CS3 using Smart
    Objects. Basically I want to layout the page with some place-holder photos
    that are smart objects and then when I need to create a page simply load the
    template PSD, right-click on the smart object layer in the layers palette
    and choose replace contents. This seems to be possible and even works
    sometimes. However, a lot of times the size of the smart object images
    change.
    For example I could set a smart object place-holder image to be 4 x 6 -
    inches at 300 dpi, replace the image with another image and the size will
    then jump to some odd size. I even had it once go to 2 x 10 inches. I
    thought the whole point of smart objects was that I could replace the
    contents and it would be sized, etc. the same. Well that is one point of
    smart objects.
    Is there a bug? Could the fact that I have layer styles and rotation and
    resize transformations applied to the smart object be creating the problem?
    Any way around this?
    This is Photoshop CS3, Windows Vista, Quad Core Processor, 4GB of RAM, 8 TB
    of hard drive space.

    Are you perhaps changing the layer order, grouping or some clipping masks? As usual I'm not working with these features a lot and probably shouldn't advise ;-), but I could imagine that this would affect rasterization and how PS may want to update info that no longer is in the place where it expects... I'd also check the "Temp" directory (Documents and Settings\Rachael\Local Settings\Temp). Perhaps it's simply full and the programs are not able to update the temporary files.
    Mylenium

  • Smart Object Sampling Technique.

    Hope I named this topic aptly. I'm pretty new to the whole up/downsampling technique thing. In years of web design, I just never had any real need of it.
    However, I ran into the following scenario:
    We have a big PS file full of pixel art & photographs, some of both are smart objects. We'd like to resize a bunch of them, but need bicubic for some, nearest-neighbor for others.
    Is there any way to set sampling techniques for each smart object?
    (If not, where does one post feature requests? ;D)
    Cheers!

    First you need to know th all smart objects are not created equal.  An embedded smart object is a copy of something "Photoshop" can be just about anything Photoshop supports.  A Raw with Raw settings,  A PSD file, A Layer, A layer set etc. Smart Objects can resized two ways. 
    The first way is the re adjust the transform associated with the Smart Object Layer (Ctrl/Command+T).  Transform I believe uses your user id Photoshop preference for interpolation. When a smart object is resized this way Photoshop first renders the pixels for the smart object the resize those pixels like a raster layer using your default interpolation method. Even if the embedded smart object is a vector or text graphic. I guess you could set your Photoshop preference interpolation before doing each transform.
    The second way to resize a smart object is by editing it in Photoshop and use Photoshop Tools.  You do this be double clicking on the smart object icon in the smart object layer in the layers palette. When you do this Photoshop or ACR will open the embedded smart object in Photoshop as a temp work document in ACR the raw file with its current ACR settings applied.   Use the tools approbate to resize.  For example if the embedded smart object was a PSD file use menu Image>Image Size. Check resample the size and interpolation.  Text and Vector layers will be resized using vector graphics or change font size raster layers will be resized using the method you set. When you commit the resize In ACR or use menu File>Save in Photoshop the embedded object in the smart object layer doubled clicked on will be update with the changes you made.

  • Smart Objects...changing canvas size problem

    When changing the canvas size of a smart object, the layer on the original document will distort visually since it doesn't update the size of the smart object.
    Is there a solution to this, or an easy way to quickly update every instance of the smart object on the original doc?
    To clarify: I know that you can change the dimensions of the smart object on the original doc and it'll fix it, my question is if there's a way to automatically have that happen and have the original doc smart objects respect your canvas size changes on the smart object doc.
    Reproduce:
    1) Draw a circle
    2) Turn it into a smart object
    3) Go into the smart object, change the canvas size by increasing the height of the canvas. The smart object should now have a circle with blank space above/below it.
    4) Save the smart object
    5) The circle on the original document will now be squished.
    I'm using Photoshop CS5

    xg3 wrote:
    When changing the canvas size of a smart object, the layer on the original document will distort visually since it doesn't update the size of the smart object.
    When you change the canvas size of a document the only layer that will change is a backgroung layer for it does not support transparency so its pixels will be changed.  However a background layer should not distort it may be cropped  and have canvas added in which case the color of the empty canvas can be set in the canvas size dialog.  All other layer including Smart Object layer should not chang at all.  Layer positioning in relationship to the canvas  and the new canvas size is set during the canvas size change.  Layers can be any size and have any aspect ratio. Their sizes can be smaller, the same or larger then the canvas size. Even layer that can fit  within a documents canvas size may be positioned so that all, some or none of the layer is over the documents canvas.
    I do not know what you mean when you write the original document chages. A smart object layer has an embedded copy of an object. The original document is not touched. You can open the smart object layer embedded object in  Photoshop by double clicking on the smart object icon in the layers palette smart object layer and change it size. And distort it f you wish. When you use Photoshop save. Photoshop will change the enbedded object in the smart object layer. You can also leave the embedded smaro object as is and change the smart object layer size and distort it using transform on the smart object layer itsself.
    I think what you did was to open the smart object in photoshop change its canvas saze then save it. The updated smart object is realy round but you dont see that it is becaue it is being transformec ti fit the original documents canvas. If you do a Canvas size on the codument you will see the original docyment canvas size is not change and thet your now squaching a now changed taller object into a shorter canvas.  With each Smart Obkect layer there is as associated transform.
    No I was wrong I just tried that and it looks like the transform was not the problem as yo can see I dir a Ctrl+T so you can see the size of the smart object layer is now biger then the original document and is positioned centered canvas is still 300x300 white area in image

  • Why do vector shapes in scaled smart objects blur?

    This remains a point of frustration.
    Why does converting a vector shape to a smart object in Photoshop mean that it's then treated as a bitmap and blurs when scaled up?
    If i paste the same vector shape into Illustrator and then back into Photoshop as a smart object it then behaves correctly, and remains sharp.
    See the image for example of what i mean. Left is the master shape, centre is it converted into a smart object in Photoshop, right pasted to and from Illustrator. These were then scaled 300% resulting in the centre one blurring.
    I don't really want to have to invovle Illustrator in this way and keep all my vector work in Photoshop now it has the tools to do so, but this issue creates me a lot of extra work.
    Or am i doing something wrong?
    Rob

    Smart Object layers are transform to other sizes through interpolating the pixels rendered for the embedded object not be using vector graphics on the embedded object.. If your resize resizes the pixel count way un the image will become soft.  Yoy can try seting your Photoshop Default interpolation setting to other setting then Adobe default Bicubic Automatic to something like plain bicubic which IMO is a better general purpose option then Bicubic Automatic.
    You can also open the embedded object by double clicking  the smart layers smart object icon in the layers palette. Once opened in Photoshop resize the vector graphic using Image size and save  the embedded vector object larger. Photoshop will update the smart object layers content then.

  • Refresh underlying image of smart object

    Hello,
    I made some basic adjustments in Lightroom and then opened the image as a smart object in Photoshop.
    If I decide to make more changes in Lightroom how do I tell Photoshop to 'refresh' the underlying image?
    Thanks,
    Will

    wjl11 wrote:
    Since the underlying file is a dng, when I 'replace contents' in photoshop, ACR pops up.
    I never used ACR to adjust the file, I used Lightroom.
    Do I just assume that the ACR settings are what I applied to the file in Lightroom?
    LR and ACR store settings for the Adobe Conversion Engine in vasious places File MetaData, Sidecar files and ACR database to name some. If an embedded smart object is a RAW file the smart object has it set of Raw conversion setting.  You can in Photoshop use menu Layers>Smart Objects>New Smart Object via Copy to create a independent new smart object layer. Once this is done in Photoshop if you double click on the copied layer leyer's smart object icon in the layers palette ACR will open on the new copy with its copied RAW Conversion settings. You can  change the setting an have ACR update the copy's RAW settings.  You will not have two different RAW conversions in Photoshop on layers you can blend together to bring out more detail. With Smart Objects you dealing with copies...

Maybe you are looking for

  • Why can't I open PDF's in my Gmail?

    I just removed google chrome from my Mac and wanted to start using Safari. When I am in my email on safari it will not let me open, preview, or download any PDF. When I click on the attachment it just keeps loading but nothing happens. Help please?

  • VL32N Zero Receiving or Setting Delivery Complete on Inbound Delivery

    ERP Retail Scenario: We receive ASN from vendor creating inbound delivery; however, some items are not received so we enter zero quantity for them into VL32N Zero quantity does not post to article document and invoice verification process (GR-IV)cann

  • MSE 7.0.220.0

                       Can MSE running software 7.0.220.0, work with WCS runing WCS-standard-K9-7.0.240.0 and WLC 5508 runing AIR-CT5500-K9-7-3-112.0 ?

  • Search TV guide options button now inoperable

    In addition to no longer having the ability to search within show descriptions for key words or guests on shows, the options button no longer brings up the choice of upcoming airings on TV vs. OnDemand content.  Using that button while searching now

  • How to use formula in enterprise custom field "Work" or "Cost"

    Hi there,I am using MS Project 2010 and I am looking for a way to customize enterprise custom field such as "Work" and "Cost" field where I was to use a formula (eg: Number1+Number2). I came to know I need to use VBA to perform that task.Could anyone