Applying Intel CPU microcode update

Hi,
after creating a virtual machine from OEL template, when the I connect to that virtual machine OEL booting process fail to Applying Intel CPU microcode update.
ghassan Hallaq

The same happens booting a xen linux kernel on original RHEL and derivatives (such has centos)
I just ignored it, and AFAIK there's no problem with xen.
Just my 2 cents.

Similar Messages

XEN VM - Applying Intel CPU microcode update fails

Hi,
I just installed OEL5 and I get the following message on boot:
Applying Intel CPU Microcode update: FATAL: Module microcode not found.
ERROR: Module microcode does not exist in /proc/modules [Failed]
From my quick Google search this is caused by the XEN virutualization. If you you get the [Failed] message then you have a serious problem.
Any ideas?
Thanks
David

The same happens booting a xen linux kernel on original RHEL and derivatives (such has centos)
I just ignored it, and AFAIK there's no problem with xen.
Just my 2 cents.

How do I update Intel CPU microcode.

I have got msi z77a gd65 motherboard. How do I update Intel CPU microcode.
01. Update CPU Microcode for Ivy Bridge E-1 and L-1(M12306A9_00000019).
&Update CPU Microcode for Sandy Bridge Q-0 and D-2(M12206A7_00000029).
Global Moderators help me.

Quote from: flobelix on 29-July-13, 05:33:53
What do you want to do? The 2500K is supported by the Z77A-GD65 out of the box no matter which bios version it is at.
You may look at this page http://www.station-drivers.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=32&t=4575

New bios for T420 Updated the CPU microcode

Hi,
Bios 1.46
(New) Updated the CPU microcode.
(Fix) Corrected the help message for enabling the microphone in the BIOS Setup.
The CPU microcode update: It will support Ivy Bridge?
Thanks
Solved!
Go to Solution.

Ivy and Sandy are compatible? I don't think so...
Maybe they just increased or blocked the amount of allowed CPU models.
I guess Mark has to step in and explain

New Bios Update. X220, X220i, X220 Tablet, X220i Version 1.39 Updated the CPU microcode

Hi,
What does Updated the CPU microcode mean, and how it improve performance or what kind of effect does this change have?
Thanks
X220, IPS, Intel Core i7-2620m, 8 gb, Samsung 840 pro 256 gb, eGPU + Zotac AMP GeForce GTX 670.

Well, first off, sorry to inform you, but in case you haven't noticed, the BIOS update does not solve the jumpy touchpad issue. In my opinion we are going to see some board swaps probably related to both the touchpad and CPU throttling issues, though I hope I am wrong.
Secondly, I haven't really noticed that, but then again, my power consumption has always been pretty spotty from day one. I'm not sure if it's USB devices to blame or possibly even Google Chrome, but I have been monitoring the possible culprits and haven't really reached any definitive conclusions.
You might try the following from a command prompt:
powercfg -energy
This will produce a report about power consumption after monitoring your laptop's idling over a 60-second period.
-Steve
Owner/Technology Specialist
Triple-S Computers - http://www.TripleSComputers.com

[SOLVED]Can the Intel microcode update(/non-update) brick my computer?

Ref news: https://www.archlinux.org/news/changes- … deupdates/
Related forum posts:
https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=188777
https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=188252
This news sounds quite scary to me. The big question is if anything I do can brick my computer.
Does doing this on kernels < 3.17.2 brick my computer?
Will upgrading to 3.17.2 without doing this brick my computer?
Last edited by simendsjo (2014-10-23 07:25:02)

Hi,
I have a rather silly question. I can't figure out if I have Intel microcode updates enabled. I have installed the intel-ucode package from [extra] (extra/intel-ucode 20140624-1), and I get this when I check dmesg:
prakhar@sim74stic ~ $ dmesg |grep microcode
[ 11.576665] microcode: CPU0 sig=0x306a9, pf=0x10, revision=0x15
[ 11.709317] microcode: CPU0 sig=0x306a9, pf=0x10, revision=0x15
[ 11.710515] microcode: CPU0 updated to revision 0x1b, date = 2014-05-29
[ 11.710545] microcode: CPU1 sig=0x306a9, pf=0x10, revision=0x15
[ 11.710602] microcode: CPU1 sig=0x306a9, pf=0x10, revision=0x15
[ 11.711282] microcode: CPU1 updated to revision 0x1b, date = 2014-05-29
[ 11.711296] microcode: CPU2 sig=0x306a9, pf=0x10, revision=0x15
[ 11.711341] microcode: CPU2 sig=0x306a9, pf=0x10, revision=0x15
[ 11.712068] microcode: CPU2 updated to revision 0x1b, date = 2014-05-29
[ 11.712080] microcode: CPU3 sig=0x306a9, pf=0x10, revision=0x15
[ 11.712134] microcode: CPU3 sig=0x306a9, pf=0x10, revision=0x15
[ 11.712859] microcode: CPU3 updated to revision 0x1b, date = 2014-05-29
[ 11.712897] microcode: CPU4 sig=0x306a9, pf=0x10, revision=0x15
[ 11.712972] microcode: CPU4 sig=0x306a9, pf=0x10, revision=0x15
[ 11.713683] microcode: CPU4 updated to revision 0x1b, date = 2014-05-29
[ 11.713698] microcode: CPU5 sig=0x306a9, pf=0x10, revision=0x15
[ 11.713736] microcode: CPU5 sig=0x306a9, pf=0x10, revision=0x15
[ 11.714451] microcode: CPU5 updated to revision 0x1b, date = 2014-05-29
[ 11.714469] microcode: CPU6 sig=0x306a9, pf=0x10, revision=0x15
[ 11.714503] microcode: CPU6 sig=0x306a9, pf=0x10, revision=0x15
[ 11.714878] microcode: CPU6 updated to revision 0x1b, date = 2014-05-29
[ 11.714888] microcode: CPU7 sig=0x306a9, pf=0x10, revision=0x15
[ 11.714907] microcode: CPU7 sig=0x306a9, pf=0x10, revision=0x15
[ 11.715282] microcode: CPU7 updated to revision 0x1b, date = 2014-05-29
[ 11.715322] microcode: Microcode Update Driver: v2.00 <[email protected]>, Peter Oruba
My question is, did the microcode update work? And should I add it to mkinitcpio to trigger it early? (sudo modprobe microcode doesn't change the output above).
Last edited by prakharsingh95 (2014-10-23 16:21:56)

02f0:cpu id: A7 no microcode update loaded for alternate processor

Dear Sir.. I am facing problem in my L420 model laptop.. that is the above mentioned 02f0:cpu id: A7 no microcode update loaded for alternate processor error code appearing.. the problem is i cant access any bootable device if i try to put new bios its not supporting os cd and any other bootable devices.. so kindly guide me to solve the issues.. how i can put new bios version or tell me the solution for login bios?

is your CPU the original one shipped with your ThinkPad?
Regards,
Jin Li
May this year, be the year of 'DO'!
I am a volunteer, and not a paid staff of Lenovo or Microsoft

I just applied an EFI firmware update to a intel core 2 duo macbook, now it won't boot up

After applying an EFI firmware update, the Macbook just spins the optical drive when I start it up! I didn't see any indication that the EFI firmware update had any problems, so I'm stumped!

And if you can't get in, you can't read the Boot Rom version…
I suspect the update may have been OK for the MB but not for the OS version.
Unfortunately I have no idea if it's even possible to roll back a firmware update, or to maybe install a later OS like 10.6 while it's in that condition.
Bigger guns than me needed here, I'm afraid.

Need help with CPU microcode for L410

I have been having some speed issues with my T3000 powered L410. I have friends with the same laptop, theirs have been upgraded with T6600 & a T6500 cpu with no issues.
As I had a spare T7500 laying around [that I know to be a good processor] I thought I'd do a swithout and swap them over....no issues doing that....turned it on and it started to boot up **SUCCESS HE THOUGHT !! ** then I got the following error message "02F0: CPU ID: FB No Microcode Update Loaded For Alternate Processor" Press <F1> to Setup. Following that procedure results in no way [I can see] to cure issue. Prior to changing the CPU I used System Update to check BIOS was the latest available; I used the Windows utility to upgrade the BIOS; BIOS report was successful update; and is reported as version 1.52 6JET94WW
Can anyone suggest a fix for this problem.....it seems weird that the PC recognises during the boot:
CPU = 1 Processors Detected, Cores per Processor = 2
Intel (R) Core(TM) 2 Duo CPU T7500 @ 2.2GHz

The T3000 is a Penryn class CPU and T7500 is Merom class. One uses digital sensors and one uses analog. I am not surprised it doesn't work, although they will fit in the same sockets, as you can see.

How can i fix "invalid processor microcode update" i have a compaq dc7600 cmt C2C6260Q93

My m/c is a HP Compaq dc7600 CC2C6260Q93).
I've replaced the 2.8 processor with INTEL(R) PENTIUM (R) D CPU 3.00 GHZ/4M , during start-up it gives the message "missing or invalid processor microcode update"
My motherboard is HP (C)2005 HP DC

Hi:
Please see my reply to your other post at the link below.
http://h30434.www3.hp.com/t5/Desktop-Operating-Systems-Software-Recovery/how-can-i-fix-quot-invalid-...

Atom PSE erratum detected, BIOS microcode update recommended

This is the information about my Netbook:
Lenovo Ideapad S10
Memory = 995,8 MiB
Processor = Intel® Atom™ CPU N270 @ 1.60GHz × 2
Graphics = Intel® 945GME x86/MMX/SSE2
System base = Arch Linux 32-bit
This is my journalctl:
[root@arch julio]# journalctl
-- Logs begin at jue 2013-09-26 14:43:49 COT, end at mié 2013-10-02 15:36:17 COT. --
sep 26 14:43:49 arch systemd-journal[103]: Runtime journal is using 184.0K (max 49.7M, leaving 74.6M of free 497.7M, current l
sep 26 14:43:49 arch systemd-journal[103]: Runtime journal is using 188.0K (max 49.7M, leaving 74.6M of free 497.7M, current l
sep 26 14:43:49 arch kernel: Initializing cgroup subsys cpuset
sep 26 14:43:49 arch kernel: Initializing cgroup subsys cpu
sep 26 14:43:49 arch kernel: Initializing cgroup subsys cpuacct
sep 26 14:43:49 arch kernel: Linux version 3.11.1-2-ARCH (tobias@testing-i686) (gcc version 4.8.1 20130725 (prerelease) (GCC)
sep 26 14:43:49 arch kernel: Atom PSE erratum detected, BIOS microcode update recommended
sep 26 14:43:49 arch kernel: e820: BIOS-provided physical RAM map:
sep 26 14:43:49 arch kernel: BIOS-e820: [mem 0x0000000000000000-0x000000000009f7ff] usable
sep 26 14:43:49 arch kernel: BIOS-e820: [mem 0x000000000009f800-0x000000000009ffff] reserved
sep 26 14:43:49 arch kernel: BIOS-e820: [mem 0x00000000000d2000-0x00000000000d3fff] reserved
sep 26 14:43:49 arch kernel: BIOS-e820: [mem 0x00000000000dc000-0x00000000000fffff] reserved
sep 26 14:43:49 arch kernel: BIOS-e820: [mem 0x0000000000100000-0x000000003f6cffff] usable
sep 26 14:43:49 arch kernel: BIOS-e820: [mem 0x000000003f6d0000-0x000000003f6e1fff] ACPI data
sep 26 14:43:49 arch kernel: BIOS-e820: [mem 0x000000003f6e2000-0x000000003f6e2fff] ACPI NVS
sep 26 14:43:49 arch kernel: BIOS-e820: [mem 0x000000003f6e3000-0x000000003fffffff] reserved
sep 26 14:43:49 arch kernel: BIOS-e820: [mem 0x00000000e0000000-0x00000000efffffff] reserved
sep 26 14:43:49 arch kernel: BIOS-e820: [mem 0x00000000fec00000-0x00000000fec0ffff] reserved
sep 26 14:43:49 arch kernel: BIOS-e820: [mem 0x00000000fed00000-0x00000000fed003ff] reserved
sep 26 14:43:49 arch kernel: BIOS-e820: [mem 0x00000000fed14000-0x00000000fed19fff] reserved
sep 26 14:43:49 arch kernel: BIOS-e820: [mem 0x00000000fed1c000-0x00000000fed8ffff] reserved
sep 26 14:43:49 arch kernel: BIOS-e820: [mem 0x00000000fee00000-0x00000000fee00fff] reserved
sep 26 14:43:49 arch kernel: BIOS-e820: [mem 0x00000000ff000000-0x00000000ffffffff] reserved
sep 26 14:43:49 arch kernel: Notice: NX (Execute Disable) protection cannot be enabled: non-PAE kernel!
sep 26 14:43:49 arch kernel: SMBIOS 2.5 present.
sep 26 14:43:49 arch kernel: DMI: LENOVO 433336U /Kuril , BIOS 14C
sep 26 14:43:49 arch kernel: e820: update [mem 0x00000000-0x00000fff] usable ==> reserved
sep 26 14:43:49 arch kernel: e820: remove [mem 0x000a0000-0x000fffff] usable
sep 26 14:43:49 arch kernel: e820: last_pfn = 0x3f6d0 max_arch_pfn = 0x100000
sep 26 14:43:49 arch kernel: MTRR default type: uncachable
lines 1-31
I did what you recommended and this product is the report
https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Microcode
Any idea?

progandy wrote:You'll have to update the bios or use the early microcode update as described here: https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentatio … rocode.txt
Interesting... perhaps this is handled some how by mkinitcpio? I didn't see anything obvious in the hooks section.
progandy wrote:Edit: You can download the microcode data here: https://downloadcenter.intel.com/Search … crocode%22
This gives the same file that [extra]/intel-ucode uses, but neither the source nor the package provides "GenuineIntel.bin" mentioned in the document.
EDIT: If the info contained in the blog post you referenced is indeed accurate, I fail to see what value the intel-ucore packages provides at all. In other words, it loads the updates after the kernel has already disabled the features the updates are fixing. Seems as though either:
1) The package provides superfluous files.
2) It needs to generate a modified initrc image as described in the early-microcode.txt file you referenced.
3) We are wrong and the package does indeed provide a solution.
EDIT2: http://lists.debian.org/debian-user/201 … 00395.html
Last edited by graysky (2013-10-03 18:27:03)

Xw6200 1801 microcode update error

Hi I have recently upgraded my xw6200 workstation cpu from 2 x intel xeon 2.8 ghz to 2 x inel xeon 3.6 ghz. the problem is when i but up my pc i get a error "1801 microcode update error" and give me the option to boot by pressing f1 and the it boots up no problem apart from the fans are a lot noisier. is there a way to solve this error every time i boot up. its not a massive problem as windows runs fine after i press F1 but any help would be appreciated thanks.

Unfortunately, the latest version of the installed BIOS version is as good as it gets.
The BIOS family 786B7, which your BIOS is a member of, was last updated in 2006.
Unless a microcode update can be found through Windows update or at Intel for the installed operating system, this may be an issue that I am unable to help you resolve.
Normally a BIOS update is the answer, but no more exist.
****Please click on Accept As Solution if a suggestion solves your problem. It helps others facing the same problem to find a solution easily****
2015 Microsoft MVP - Windows Experience Consumer

Flash player 10.3.181.14 requires intel pentium 4 2.33ghz,I have intel CPU T2080@1.73ghz processor

I am trying to use Adobe Flash player at home to simply surf the web. For a long time I've been getting prompts to update Flash Player and however much I updated it the prompts kept on poping up. This got so frustrating I decided i'd try to fix the problem once and for all. So I checked the system requirements Adobe recommend for the update I had been downloading and found one of the minimum requirements to be an intel pentium 4 2.33ghz processor. I checked my system and I have only an intel CPU [email protected] processor. My question is, does this explain why I am having so many problems? I've tried to download an earlier version of Flash Player but I always get redirected to the 10.3.181.14 version. How it has come to this I am not quite sure but I must admit I have removed the Flash Player from my computer at the moment and I'm worried that it was a mistake because will I ever get a working version again? I am running Windows Vista 32bit and Internet Explorer 8 32bit. I am out of my depth so please be gentle!

You might have better luck if you post your question in the Flash Player forum...
http://forums.adobe.com/community/webplayers/flash_player

How to fix "1801-Microcode Update Error" in HP Compaq dc7800 Convertible Minitower

I have Intel Core 2 Duo @ 2.93 Ghz. My operating system is Windows 7 Ultimate x64.
This question was solved.
View Solution.

Hi:
The E7500 processor is not supported in the dc7800, which is why you are getting the microcode error.
Below is the list of supported processors.
Intel Core 2 Duo Processors:
Intel Core 2 Duo E4500 Processor (2.20-GHz, 2 MB L2 cache, 800-MHz FSB)
Intel Core 2 Duo E4600 Processor (2.40-GHz, 2 MB L2 cache, 800-MHz FSB)
Intel Core 2 Duo E4700 Processor (2.6-GHz, 2 MB L2 cache, 800-MHz FSB)
Intel Core 2 Duo E6550 Processor (2.33-GHz, 4 MB L2 cache, 1333-MHz FSB)
Intel Core 2 Duo E6750 Processor (2.66-GHz, 4 MB L2 cache, 1333-MHz FSB)
Intel Core 2 Duo E6850 Processor (3.0-GHz, 4 MB L2 cache, 1333-MHz FSB)
Intel Core 2 Duo E7200 Processor (2.53 GHz, 3 MB L2 cache, 1066 MHz FSB)
Intel Core 2 Duo E7300 Processor (2.66 GHz, 3MB L2 cache, 1066 MHz FSB)
Intel Core 2 Duo E8200 Processor (2.66-GHz, 6 MB L2 cache, 1333-MHz FSB)
Intel Core 2 Duo E8300 Processor (2.83-GHz, 6 MB L2 cache, 1333-MHz FSB)
Intel Core 2 Duo E8400 Processor (3.00-GHz, 6 MB L2 cache, 1333-MHz FSB)
Intel Core 2 Duo E8500 Processor (3.16-GHz, 6 MB L2 cache, 1333-MHz FSB)
Inter Core 2 Duo E8600 Processor (3.33-GHz, 6 MB L2 Cache, 1333-MHz FSB)
As a long shot, you can try installing the latest microcode update. You need to use a bootable USB flash drive with dos files so you can run the flashbin.exe command after you copy the microcode update files to your bootable flash drive.
I can't get to the dc7800 support site. When you can, select the microcode update download from 2010 v1.14
If you are unfamiliar with how to make a flash drive bootable, here is a good "how to" article with the files you need.
http://www.techpowerup.com/forums/showthread.php?t=47812
Paul

[SOLVED] AMD Microcode update failed (on Xen host)

I have an Arch system running as a VM Host based on Xen 4.4.1
It is yet unclear to me why the VMHost (Dom0) cannot update the CPU microcode of the AMD Opteron 3365.
The following errors appear.
[ 9.664531] microcode: CPU0: patch_level=0x0600081c
[ 9.664548] microcode: CPU1: patch_level=0x0600081c
[ 9.664566] microcode: CPU2: patch_level=0x0600081c
[ 9.664580] microcode: CPU3: patch_level=0x0600081c
[ 9.664593] microcode: CPU4: patch_level=0x0600081c
[ 9.664607] microcode: CPU5: patch_level=0x0600081c
[ 9.664624] microcode: CPU6: patch_level=0x0600081c
[ 9.664639] microcode: CPU7: patch_level=0x0600081c
[ 9.664723] microcode: Microcode Update Driver: v2.00 <[email protected]>, Peter Oruba
[ 18.344286] microcode: CPU0: update failed for patch_level=0x06000832
[ 18.345579] microcode: CPU1: update failed for patch_level=0x06000832
[ 18.346899] microcode: CPU2: update failed for patch_level=0x06000832
[ 18.348202] microcode: CPU3: update failed for patch_level=0x06000832
[ 18.349488] microcode: CPU4: update failed for patch_level=0x06000832
[ 18.350776] microcode: CPU5: update failed for patch_level=0x06000832
[ 18.352063] microcode: CPU6: update failed for patch_level=0x06000832
[ 18.353352] microcode: CPU7: update failed for patch_level=0x06000832
I am aware that Xen can do some early loading of microcodes, since I have found clues in the Xen git logs.
But I guess Xen does not update the microcode, since the OS in Dom0 believes it is necessary to update the microcode.
Does anybody have a clue why updating the CPU microcode from within Dom0 fails?
Last edited by ArthurBorsboom (2015-01-10 12:45:29)

I have solved the issue by using the Xen early microcode loading with the following changes.
Copy the correct microcode binary to the boot folder.
sudo cp /lib/firmware/amd-ucode/microcode_amd_fam15h.bin /boot
Edit the Xen command line in /etc/xen/grub.conf from
XEN_HYPERVISOR_CMDLINE="dom0_mem=1024M,max:1024M xsave=1"
to
XEN_HYPERVISOR_CMDLINE="dom0_mem=1024M,max:1024M xsave=1 ucode=-1"
Hardcode the /etc/grub.d/09_xen configuration file to load the binary.
From
menuentry "Xen ${XEN_VERSION} / Arch Linux ${_KERNEL_PKG_} kernel" ${CLASS} {
$(save_default_entry)
if [ x\$feature_all_video_module = xy ]; then
insmod all_video
fi
set gfxpayload=keep
insmod ${BOOT_PART_FS}
if [ x\$feature_platform_search_hint = xy ]; then
search --no-floppy --fs-uuid --set=root ${BOOT_PART_HINTS_STRING} ${BOOT_PART_FS_UUID}
else
search --no-floppy --fs-uuid --set=root ${BOOT_PART_FS_UUID}
fi
echo '$(printf "Loading Xen %s ..." ${XEN_VERSION})'
multiboot ${REAL_DIR}/${XEN_BASENAME} ${REAL_DIR}/${XEN_BASENAME} ${XEN_HYPERVISOR_CMDLINE}
echo 'Loading Arch Linux ${_KERNEL_PKG_} kernel ...'
module ${REAL_DIR}/${_KERNEL_FILE_} ${REAL_DIR}/${_KERNEL_FILE_} root=${GRUB_LINUX_ROOT_DEVICE} rw ${GRUB_LINUX_PARAMS}
echo 'Loading Arch Linux ${_KERNEL_PKG_} kernel initramfs ...'
module ${REAL_DIR}/${_INITRAMFS_}
To
menuentry "Xen ${XEN_VERSION} / Arch Linux ${_KERNEL_PKG_} kernel" ${CLASS} {
$(save_default_entry)
if [ x\$feature_all_video_module = xy ]; then
insmod all_video
fi
set gfxpayload=keep
insmod ${BOOT_PART_FS}
if [ x\$feature_platform_search_hint = xy ]; then
search --no-floppy --fs-uuid --set=root ${BOOT_PART_HINTS_STRING} ${BOOT_PART_FS_UUID}
else
search --no-floppy --fs-uuid --set=root ${BOOT_PART_FS_UUID}
fi
echo '$(printf "Loading Xen %s ..." ${XEN_VERSION})'
multiboot ${REAL_DIR}/${XEN_BASENAME} ${REAL_DIR}/${XEN_BASENAME} ${XEN_HYPERVISOR_CMDLINE}
echo 'Loading Arch Linux ${_KERNEL_PKG_} kernel ...'
module ${REAL_DIR}/${_KERNEL_FILE_} ${REAL_DIR}/${_KERNEL_FILE_} root=${GRUB_LINUX_ROOT_DEVICE} rw ${GRUB_LINUX_PARAMS}
echo 'Loading Arch Linux ${_KERNEL_PKG_} kernel initramfs ...'
module ${REAL_DIR}/${_INITRAMFS_}
echo 'Loading AMD Microcode'
module ${REAL_DIR}/microcode_amd_fam15h.bin
Rebuild the grub configuration file
sudo grub-mkconfig -o /boot/grub/grub.cfg
And reboot
Check with the following command that Xen is running
dmesg | grep xen
Check with the following command that the microcode has the correct version
[arthur@orion1695 ~]$ dmesg | grep microcode
[ 9.379631] microcode: CPU0: patch_level=0x06000832
[ 9.379645] microcode: CPU1: patch_level=0x06000832
[ 9.379662] microcode: CPU2: patch_level=0x06000832
[ 9.379676] microcode: CPU3: patch_level=0x06000832
[ 9.379692] microcode: CPU4: patch_level=0x06000832
[ 9.379710] microcode: CPU5: patch_level=0x06000832
[ 9.379724] microcode: CPU6: patch_level=0x06000832
[ 9.379738] microcode: CPU7: patch_level=0x06000832
[ 9.379823] microcode: Microcode Update Driver: v2.00 <[email protected]>, Peter Oruba
[arthur@orion1695 ~]$
And as you see in this example, there is no attempt to update the microcode anymore, since it is already up-to-date.
I hope this helps other people facing this issue.

Applying Intel CPU microcode update

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for