Applying widescreen matte to still photos in motion

I shot some footage for a documentary using my Canon XL2, 16:9 format. I'm adding some still photos using motion. Is it possible to apply the Widescreen matte effect so the photos match the widescreen look of my footage? I can't figure out how.

Use the Photoshop preset for DV/D1 widescreen as a template and paste your photos into that.
You will need to use Photoshop's Transform controls to frame your photos and have to decide what part of the top and/or bottom gets cropped off.
If you want to zoom or pan, use the original photos in Motion and make sure the photo fills the screen at its smallest size. Again, you will have to sacrifice the top or bottom of the photo to some extent.
If you absolutely must see all of the photo's content, consider using a complimentary background fill, perhaps with some blurring. Place your photo on top and shrink it down to within the safe area.

Similar Messages

  • Acceptable File Size and Resolution for Still Photos in Keyframe Motion

    Hello Hello
    I know that FCE HD (as other Video Editors), will automatically fit a still photo's size to it's default capability of 720 x 480 Correct?
    Well, in regard to making the best possible ZOOMS, and Pans from Still Photos, is it neccessary to re-size all your photos (from an external editor like photoshop), to a specfic size?
    According to an older book for FCE, it sez that actually photos re-sized to 720x534 with a resolution of 72 are best. *The proper proportion for NTSC.
    And I noticed that when I inserted larger JPG still sizes (like about a meg), on the FCE timline, and when applying Panning, or Zooms, some of the rendered images with motion didn't pan or zoom smoothly.
    Is that because those file sizes were TOO large?
    Well I have soooo many stills that need to be imported into this particular project that it would be a lot easier for me to just generally reduce these stills (by percentage).
    And is the magic resolution amount supposed to be 72?
    Because if that's the case I can re-size all my photos to 72, and try to keep the file sizes down to say 300 KB's or so.
    Sound like a plan?

    Thank you guys
    "basically, you should try to make your images large enough so they never have to be scaled beyond 100% in the motion tab in fcp."
    Actually as I mentioned some of these file sizes are very large. About 800-900 KB's - and what as a result, what I've noticed is that I actually had to DECREASE the viewing area in both the Browser Window, and the Canvas Winbow just to be able to see the whole image.
    Ok - so the 72 DPI is not as important as the dimensions of the photo. But as I said I have soooooo many of these that it would take me forever to manually re-size them all not to mention the fact that re-sizing some of them (odd shapes),would throw the images out of balance.
    So again I ask - if there is NO motion applied to the photo, file sizes of about 200 to 350 KB's appear just beautifully ....
    BUT
    If I need to PAN or ZOOM, is it ok to laod a 1 MEG sized JPG onto the timeline and start working with Keyframe?????
    In fact in some cases I'm actually using these larger file JPS's (1 meg or more), so that they TOTALLLY fit the canvas window (cropping them by enlargment)
    *With some clipping of the original image of course ...
    Why do I do this?
    So that you don't see the usual border with horizontal images, or vertical images - know what I mean?
    Thanx

  • Still photo "zoom" through motion

    Hi,
    I'm trying to create a "memories slideshow" consisting of still photos that zoom in slowly. I'm encountering a couple problems that I'm hoping to get help with:
    1) When zooming in by setting keyframes in each clip's motion tab, I find that it's difficult to get each photo to zoom in at the same speed and direction. Is there a shortcut to doing this easily? I guess the effect I'm aiming for is similar to what iPhoto does automatically with an album slideshow, just more controlled. (Is there any way to just do this from iPhoto and adjust the settings for each clip's duration and zoom?)
    2) When I zoom in I find that the images become very blurry, although they are less so when viewed in the program I used to scan them (Lexmark Imaging Studio on a PC). I scanned the images at 300 DPI and saved them to JPEG. I realize these settings may not be optimal - what DPI and file format are recommended if I want to zoom in to, say, 5x?
    Thanks.

    1) When zooming in by setting keyframes in each
    clip's motion tab, I find that it's difficult to get
    each photo to zoom in at the same speed and
    direction. Is there a shortcut to doing this easily?
    I guess the effect I'm aiming for is similar to what
    iPhoto does automatically with an album slideshow,
    just more controlled. (Is there any way to just do
    this from iPhoto and adjust the settings for each
    clip's duration and zoom?)
    Speed of a move is dependent upon the length of of the move. A move set up to do the "same" thing will be faster if there is a shorter duration between the keyframes. if all of you photos are the same size and aspect ratio, set one up to your liking then save that as a Motion Favorite, then you can apply that to them all. And there is no way to take info from iPhoto and adjust in FCP.
    2) When I zoom in I find that the images become very
    blurry, although they are less so when viewed in the
    program I used to scan them (Lexmark Imaging Studio
    on a PC). I scanned the images at 300 DPI and saved
    them to JPEG. I realize these settings may not be
    optimal - what DPI and file format are recommended if
    I want to zoom in to, say, 5x?
    300dpi is high for video. Video is 72dpi. But a higher dpi scan means you can zoom further in without the image breaking up. If they are blurry... have you rendered the move? They should look better when rendered.
    Doing still moves is a difficult task. If you search the forum you will find many topics on the issue that will provide valuable tips.

  • Can't get still photos that have motion key frames to stop "shaking."

    Hi folks,
    I am currently trying to make a video comprised soley of still photos for a friend that has recently lost his 16 year old daughter to a tragic accident. I'm trying to get this done by Saturday June 13th. I'm setting motion keyframes throught the viewers "motion" tab and when I play the final result I see in almost every picture popping and shaking while in motion. Am I doing something wrong? Is there a specific way to upload the pics or format them so this doesn't happen? I'm using FCE 4 with an iMac G5 (pre-INTEL). If someone could help me with this I would really be grateful. Thanks again.
    Message was edited by: BudweiserDave
    Message was edited by: BudweiserDave

    Most of these errors are related to trying to view the results on a progressive computer monitor instead of an interlaced tv set.
    You could export the whole movie and reimport it as a single item. apply a 2 pixel vertical blur to the whole thing, render, print.
    bogiesan

  • I'm trying to make "Stop motion videos"  in Final Cut EXPRESS by using 100's of still photos and setting them to music.  They are coming out blurry if viewed larger than 4x6 in size

    I'm trying to make "Stop motion videos"  in Final Cut EXPRESS by using 100's of still photos and setting them to music.  They are coming out blurry if viewed larger than 4x6 in size.
    I don't understand why this is happening. 

    Quick follow up, since I was on my phone earlier and am back to a real keyboard.
    To access Easy Setup, hit Control Q.
    If you click on the blue discosure triangles, a dropdown menu with about a dozen different presets will be displayed. Select the one you want, (Here, I've selected 720P.)
    Whatever you select for a preset will not be applied until you make a new sequence. (I don't like to have sequences with different properties in the same project so I prefer to make a new project if I change the Easy Setup.)
    Because photo aspect ratios are different than video, I typically put a solid generator of some compatible color on the first track (v1) and put my photos on the track above (v2). Looks better, IMO, than black bars. There are other creative ways to display them. And of course, you could scale them up to fill the frame…but then you probably would have to re-position them.
    Good luck.
    Russ

  • How do i apply a widescreen matt to a rotated clip without the matt rotating too?

    Hi,
    I'm new to this.... but i have a problem...
    Basically some of my footage isn't straight and i rotate it a little but obviously i have the black in the gaps where the image has moved.... but to combat that i want to apply a widescreen matte (which is being applied to the rest of the film anyway)..
    BUT when i apply to matte it rotates to the image.... is there anyway to stop this?
    Thanks

    apply a matte to the layer above.
    You can create one in Photoshop,
    or download my Letterboxer Plugin (free, and I guess will not work in FCP X. :-(
    Or use the one Andy Mees has built. ( http://web.me.com/andymees/Free_and_Easy/main/Entries/2008/1/23_Andy%E2%80%99s_L etterbox_2.html )
    Rienk

  • How do I create motion for still photos/pictures. I'd like to pan/scan & zoom. Please help!

    How do I create motion for still photos/pictures. I'd like to pan/scan & zoom. Please help!

    You kind of answered your own question..
    Check out Motion in the FX Control Window and learn how keyframing works..

  • Motion unresponsive with many still photos

    I've read many posts dealing with Motion 3's slow performance - especially in projects with a lot of elements... but none of them have provided a solution that has worked for me.
    I have a project that is made of many still photos in jpeg format. In one scene I've built a 13 x 13 matrix of many still photos (169 total photos). It looks fantastic - too bad I can't manipulate the photos for editing since Motion just chokes on it.
    Is there any way I can do something to that scene so I don't have to wait 30 mins for it to load and another 30 mins after a single edit?
    Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated.
    Thanks

    Using a replicator was a thought I had initially - but the matrix of photos will be animated in such a way where I would want more control of every single photo going forward in the project. It's sorta like that old iPod/iTunes commercial they released a while back where a tower of album art gets sucked into an iPod (remember that one?).
    For this same reason I didn't want to shrink the photos before importing them into Motion - since I would be zooming in and out of certain photos of the matrix and I didn't want to lose image quality.
    but perhaps I could shrink them a bit more before importing - I just don't know how much that would help it.
    Message was edited by: yeequon

  • I have used still photos to make a Quick Time movie using FCE.  The DVD made using i-DVD looks somewhat grainy and the motion isn't smooth when played on my TV.  Other DVD's I have made play much better and I am wondering if the problem is my Quick Time m

    I have used still photos to make a Quick Time movie using FCE.  The DVD made using i-DVD looks somewhat grainy and the motion isn’t smooth when played on my TV.  Other DVD’s I have made play much better and I am wondering if the problem is my Quick Time movie settings.  The Dimensions and size of the problem movie are 1920X1080 and 584 MB respectively, while the movies that play better  have Dimensions of 853X480 and are about 1.3 GB in size.  Is this the source of my problem and how do I change things for the better. 

    Are you exporting to QuickTime Movie, or to QuickTime Conversion?   For iDVD, you need to export to QuickTime Movie.   Exporting to QT Conversion will kill the quality if you are moving the video from FCE to iDVD.
    The file size per se makes no difference.
    What size (pixel dimensions) are the photos that you put into your 1920x1080 sequence?  Also, exactly what are the sequence properties ... is it 1920x1080i60 ... or i50?  In North America it should be i60.
    853X480 is an odd frame size.  Where are you seeing this number?  It would appear to be DV-NTSC, which has a frame size of 720x480.  Your 1920x1080 frame size would not be DV-NTSC, it would be Apple Intermediate Codec.   DV and AIC will look different, for sure.
    Also, your quality setting in iDVD can affect the final video.  You may want to check that also (in iDVD Preferences > Projects).  Set it to Professional Quality if at all possible.

  • Can you make still photos have a 3D "look" in Motion 5?

    Hello All,
    I don't mean 3D like the kind you need to see with blue and red glasses, I mean that technique where you can make different objects in the still photo appear as if the camera is moving passed them.
    If this can be done in Motion 5 does anyone here know of a good tutorial?
    Thanks for your help.
    Mike

    Michael Ryan. wrote:
    … Can this be used on video?  (I have some old film I would like to touch up).…
    no, sorry, me lost in translation:
    I meant, if you have to do some graphics FOR, not with video (arrows, titles, UFOs, masks), Pixelmator is an excellent tool.
    spicing up old film ...
    a) it IS old … so, why not keeping it looking 'old'?
    b) I was lately allowed to use NEAT Video .... I had to use some badly worse compressed arial TV recordings.avi in a HDef project (LOL!) - and that Neat filter did marvel! it didn't only reduced 'noise', it made it vanish. ok, if you exaggerate, the picture gets a 'flat', posterized look. Neat is actually offering a Home edition for 49$ - that's a snap.
    c) usually, if you use M5, you're  using FCPX too - its filters and the Color-'board', wisely used, allow to push faded colors and contrasts very easy = I'm no professional color-grader, but the Color Correction tools are dead easy (deeper shadows? 'deepen'/lower low tones. less orange? drag 'pointer' to orange, low that … etc really 'real life logic', not some weird tech-lingo .... )
    for beginners like me, this is my source
    http://www.colorgradingcentral.com/final-cut-pro-x-color-grading-table-of-conten ts

  • Still photo scaling and motion

    I'm editing a series of still photos and can't figure out how to properly scale the photos and add zooms and other motions. Any advice??

    To do this in FCP, place the images in the order you want on the Timeline. Double-click one to load it into the Viewer window. Click on the Motion tab, then use the SCALE and CENTER controls to set the animation you want.
    Once you set the initial keyframe for an image, FCP will automatically add new keyframes for each change over the duration of the image. Setting the Canvas window to Image+Wireframe mode will allow you to scale and drag the image with the mouse.
    This book may help: http://tinyurl.com/5csyaw
    -DH

  • Widescreen Matte and Motion

    I have put a widescreen matte over my project and it looks great. The only problem is when I try to use motion (zoom in on a photograph for instance) the entire frame zooms, including the widescreen. So essentially the frame turns into fullscreen and it looks very awkward. I don't see a way to put the matte on a higher level than the motion. Does anyone know a way I can solve this? Thanks in advance for any help. -Pat

    here are two solutions for your problem:
    1) Make your own widescreen bars out of black mattes and place them in the tracks above your video.
    2) Nest your edited sequence (the one with the motion) into another sequence and put the widescreen matte on that one.
    #2 is the preferred route. #1 would just make for more rendering time.
    Worth remembering that when you letterbox a 4:3 movie, for the best result you need to assess each shot's composition as it stands after the letterbox has been added. Each shot may need to be reframed, perhaps a little resizing too to push out distracting edging from otherwise obscured elements. For this reason alone #1 is by far the better approach. As for rendering, you will need to do so regardless of method.
    Good luck
    Andy

  • Still Photo Aspect Ratio Confusion

    Apologize for asking a question on this topic as I have been through the forum and realize the topic of aspect ratio comes up often. I have not however seen this question answered. Quick background:
    -Working with HD Video footage imported as SD as I am burning non-HD dvd's and I have heard the conversion in IDVD and Toast from HD is not great;
    -Using photos imported from Aperture in FCE;
    -Sequence is NTSC anamorphic as I want 16:9 but without HD;
    My question is about the aspect ratio of still photos when I bring them into the timeline. I have experimented with saving photos in different aspect ratios: 853x480 and 720x480. When I import into FCE the 853 shows a square pixel and the 720 shows a NTSC pixel. From what I have read this is due to the way FCE interprets the aspect ratio and assigns an pixel aspect. When I view each in the viewer they both look correct when I click the corresponding pixel aspect from the top of the viewer. It is when I move these to the timeline that I get confused. The 853 gets an adjustment of 18.52 and the 720 gets an adjustment of 33.33. What do these adjustments actually represent? Is it a percentage, a number of pixels, something else? When I read about it in the Manual it seems to state that FCE adjusts for the difference between the still and sequence, but then why does it adjust the 720 since it has the same pixel aspect as the sequence? I then tried changing the Pixel aspect of the 853 in the browser to NTSC and moving it to the timeline. I get the same 33.33 adjustment. The 33.33 does not look correct in either of them, but when I change it to 18.52 it looks correct (with the pixel aspect at square, with it not checked it looks "skinny" or squished).
    Only thing I can think is that it has something to do with the anamorphic adjustment and the squeezing that goes on with it as 18.52 as 853 (widescreen) is 18.47 percent wider the 720.
    At this point I am really not sure how these will display when I make a dvd and display on a widescreen tv. I would prefer not to do this by guessing or looking at the picture, but instead by understanding what FCE is doing and making sure I have the settings and adjustments correct.
    Sorry for the long message, but would really appreciate any advice

    Michael,
    sorry to disagree, but for sure I was not clear, and the topic is quite complex. So I decided to provide an overview (as much as I can...) of the various combinations of clips inserted into various sequences with all settings - possibly on my web site (I'm afraid other posters are getting bored about all this math).
    But since this is taking quite a bit of time, let me just tell you now where I disagree about your findings. When I'll have my overview completed I hope that will better explain what I mean.
    _Your point 1_.
    I'm pretty sure you (unwillingly) are importing your 16:9 square pixel NTSC clip into a +4:3 CCIR pixel NTSC sequence+ (not your original 16:9 anamorphic NTSC sequence). Please check your sequence settings by selecting the sequence in the browser in list view and reading the Frame Size, Pixel Aspect, and Anamorphic fields.
    a. If your sequence is in fact +4:3 CCIR pixel NTSC sequence+, by applying the formulas you get:
    - PARclip for +16:9 square pixel NTSC+ clip = 853/853 = 1 (as for any square pixel clip)
    - but PARseq is not 1 (as you write) but 640/720 (square/actual pixels) = 0,8888
    - Adjust = PARseq/PARclip = 0,8888/1 = 0,8888.
    - Since Adjust is <1 Motion Aspect Ratio = - 100* (1/0,8888 -1) = -12,5 as you experienced on FCE. BTW this means that the imported clip has to be squeezed vertically by 12,5% (as opposite of horizontally).
    b. If your sequence instead really is +16:9 anamorphic NTSC+ as you seem to imply, then 18,52 is correct as you confirm yourself with "Agree that in the four cases you list it agrees...": it is in fact the 2nd case in my 4 cases list.
    _Your point 2_.
    Here I suppose the sequence is +16:9 CCIR pixel NTSC+ which has PARseq = 853/720 = 1,1852.
    But I'm not clear what you mean by "720/640 NTSC clip". My guess is that you mean a +4:3 CCIR pixel NTSC+ clip,
    then PARclip = 640/720 (square/actual pixels) = 0,8888
    then Adjust = PARseq/PARclip = 1,1852/0,8888 = 1,3333 and Motion Aspect Ratio = 100*(1,3333 - 1) = 33,33 as you experienced
    _Adjust formula_.
    I think this formula in your earlier message is incorrect: Aspect Ratio (in Motion/Distort) = - 100 * (1/Adjust-1) if Adjust ≤ 1; seems like the formula: Aspect Ratio (in Motion/Distort) = 100 * (Adjust-1) if Adjust ≥ 1 works at all times including <1 as follows 100*(.875-1)=-12.5.</div>
    This not true (well it is true only for Adjust = 1...). As an example if Adjust = 0,8888 then 100*(0,5-1) = -11,12 (wrong value for this pixel adjustment), while -100*(1/0,8888-1) = -12,51 which is the correct vertical squeeze !!
    Why 2 different formulas are needed ? because when Adjust is >1 a +horizontal squeeze+ by Adjust is necessary to fix the pixel aspect ratio misalignement, when Adjust is <1 a +vertical squeeze+ is necessary by 1/Adjust... (figures will help as soon as they are ready for... publishing).
    I'm sorry these posts are so long, I try to make them as clear as possible, but the topic is a bit messy and, even if only fractions are involved in this math, their actual meaning is not always intuitive...I'd really appreciate any comment also by more experienced users of FCE/FCP...
    Thanks
    Piero

  • Still photos in PRE 12 and output to HD DVD for TV

    Hi,
    I was using Final Cut Express 4 HD on my old iMac but bought a new late 2013 iMac and learned that FCE will not run on Mavericks (and if you install it you will destroy your OS X plugin manager without any chance to repair it)!
    Ok FC Pro X is far way to expensive for me right now, as I just use the app to build nicer photo slide shows. iMove has just a single track and therefore I'm already on the limits. Ok this is where PRE 12 comes into the game and so far I love what I see in the editor. But when it comes to exporting and sharing my work for Full HD TV I'm more than disappointed.
    Here is what I use. I exported all my images with 1920x1080 pixels as JPG, max quality with 72dpi and they are looking great on my iMac.
    When I import the stills into PRE they are OK when I see them in the editor. I switched off the still optimization feature and set the highest quality to render the preview.
    When looking at the clip on my iMac in the editor is ok so far, but at full screen the images are unsharp, blurry and have ghosting and artefacts. Well I could live with that when it would only be the preview but exporting the video a DVD with Full HD the result is as the preview, images are unsharp, blurry showing artefacts and ghosting. And I can't make it better by manipulating the settiings in the DVD dialog. Maybe I'm doing it wrong!?
    The only way to make my photos in the video looking tack sharp and brilliant as they are is when I use MPEG format with Full HD settings and look at the video with quick time.
    Why don't I get the same result when burning the video on DVD? Any hints?
    In regards to the DVD quality I had no problems with FCE 4 HD! And the images (still photos) are the same footage I used to compare the output!
    Secondly I just use the PRE 12 trial version, hope that this is not the reason? The annoying "always on" banner saying that it is a trial version is already something I dislike, but what I experience and makes it even worse is that PRE 12 is crashing again and again on different steps I take, sometimes when I change a setting, sometimes when I scrub, sometimes when selecting a fade, sometimes when importing footage and other step....
    With all this the disappointing quality on DVD's and the many crashes I can't find a lot of arguments right now to make the trial a full version?!
    Cheers and many thanks for help!
    Happy New Year!
    Yogie

    Yogi
    First, I want you to assure that you are not bothered by pile ups of preview files, conformed audio, and conformed video files. If these files are in the default location, please check wherever they may be in Premiere Elements 12 Mac (I am strictly an Elements Windows user)....
    Adobe Premiere Elements Preview Files Folder....preview files
    Media Cache Folder (cfa and pek files)....conformed audio
    Media Cache (.mcdb files)....conformed video
    Check Edit Menu/Preferences/Scratch Disks to assure that all the scratch disk categories are directed to a hard drive save location with adequate free space to accept them.
    Now for the project itself...set the Premiere Elements 12 project preset manually, using
    File Menu/New/Project
    PAL
    DSLR
    1080p
    DSLR 1080p25
    Before you close out of there, make sure that you have a check mark next to "Force Selected Project Setting on This Project". Then, when you enter the Premiere Elements workspace, import your source media into the project with Add Media/Files and Folders/Project Assets.
    Render the Timeline and then decide if the image quality is impoved. You might explore applying a very small Sharpen effect to the images. Have the others taken you through the drill of evaluating your computer video card and its driver version?
    ATR
    Let us determine what we have at this stage and then we can decide if any improvement on the path to PAL DVD-VIDEO Widescreen on DVD disc.
    Thank you.
    ATR

  • The editable rectangles of my still photos in the composition panel suddenly stopped showing up.

    Hi There, Adobe Community!
    I am relatively new to After Effects CC and am using it to create a stop motion film with a large amount of photos.
    Usually, when importing the individual images into my composition panel, a sequence of editable rectangles appears in the compostition panel allowing me to edit the frame length of the still photos.
    After around 950 imported images, the little rectangles suddenly stopped showing up. But when looking at a preview of the project, it's as if the photos are in there, in the sequence they should be. I'm just unable to edit them like the previous ones with recangles showing.
    I probably am not describing this too well, so here is a screen shot which hopefully makes my problem somewhat more clear. The area of issue is where you see the descending sequence of boxes in the comp panel. The red tracking bar is there to show that there are still photos continuing the sequence, I just can't see the boxes for em..
    thank you so much for any help in the matter!

    So I guess you are talking about the layers in the timeline go missing, not the handles in the Comp Window.
    I think you have run into a display bug. Try selecting the top hundred or so layers and pre-compose them. If the missing layers appear then that's the problem. I have had it happen a couple of times before in previous versions of AE..
    Here's a workflow hint for you, break your comps up into short sequences instead of trying to do a 4 or 5 minute piece with 900 layers in a single comp. You'll find editing and changing a lot easier.
    I would also pre-mix your music. AE is a really terrible music mixer....

Maybe you are looking for