ApplyVAT not working as expected with Incoming payment

Using SAP B1 v9 PL11
Following snippet:
            With oIncomingPayment
                .DocDate = Strings.Left(dr("DTStamp"), 10)
                .CardCode = dr("CardCode")
                .ApplyVAT = SAPbobsCOM.BoYesNoEnum.tNO
                .CashSum = totalPayment
                .TransferSum = 0
                    With .Invoices
                        .DocEntry = InvNum
                        .InvoiceType = SAPbobsCOM.BoRcptInvTypes.it_Invoice
                        .SumApplied = PaymentToApplyToInvoice 'SUM OF INVOICE
                        sumInvoices += PaymentToApplyToInvoice 'SUM OF INVOICE
                    End With
           End With
There is no error code when doing the .Add()
The Payment gets added (to ORCT) but ApplyVAT='Y" in the table even though CashSum and DocTotal are correct (i.e. same as the payment)
SumApplied in the table RCT2 includes VAt and the invoice also gets closed even with a partial payment (and SumApplied gets automatically set to the total of the underlying Invoice in OINV). When the next payment occurs then get error saying Invoice is closed.
What am I doing wrong?

Hi mixie,
I've not seen this problem before on Hudson, but I have on other CI servers - one thing to check is to make sure the date/time on the SVN server and on the Hudson server are in sync - the time I saw this problem is when the times were out of sync and when the CI server asked SVN, "tell me whether there have been any commits since <last_build_time>" the answer was "yes" because <last_build_time> was far in the past.
Otherwise, you might want to try asking on the [url http://wiki.hudson-ci.org/display/HUDSON/Mailing+List]Hudson Mailing List
John

Similar Messages

Read Key and Write Key not working as expected with paths on RT

The configuration file VIs Read Key (Path) and Write Key (Path) don't seem to work as expected (at least not as I was expecting them to) on an RT target.
When working on my WinXP PC with these two VIs, paths are translated to what looks like is supposed to be a device-independent format before being written to disk. The path C:\dir\file.txt becomes /C/dir/file.txt when writing and vice versa when reading. On my RT target, however, that same path is written to disk as C:\dir\file.txt, unchanged from the native format.
The translaton of a native path to and from the device-independent format appears to be the responsibility of Specific Path to Common Path and Common Path to Specific Path. These both use the App.TargetOS property to determine the operating system. In the case structure for these two VIs, however, there is no case for PharLap or RTX. (My RT hardware is runnng PharLap; I don't know enough about RTX to comment.) This means that the results of String to Path or Path to String are used without translating between the device-independent format to the native path format.
This isn't a problem if you create a configuration file on one machine and use it on that same machine. I noticed this only when tranferring a config file from my PC to the RT target, where the target would not open the file paths it loaded from the configuration file.
This occurs on 7.1.1 and 8.0. I don't have 8.20 to see if happens there, too.

In LV 8.2, this was fixed.
The problem is App.TargetOS returns "Pharlap" on RT systems, and "Pharlap" is handled by the default case ("invalid OS target") in LV 8.0. In LV 8.2 the default case is "Windows 95/NT", however. The reason you could write and read an .ini file on RT in LV 8.0 and earlier is because these two VIs (listed below) were both running the default case of "invalid OS target".
vi.lib\Utility\config.llb\Common Path to Specific Path.vi
vi.lib\Utility\config.llb\Specific Path to Common Path.vi
As you saw, this fails when you perform one operation in Pharlap but the other in Windows. You can fix this by modifying the two VIs listed above. Just go to the case structure and make "Windows 95/NT" the default case.

ServiceDesk software not working as expected with new Firefox version

After recently upgrading to Firefox 5.0, I have discovered that the ServiceDesk software I use with Firefox no longer works as expected. This software is ManageEngine ServiceDesk Plus 8.0. The problem is irratic but unique to Firefox. I don't have this problem with Chrome or IE.
The problem is this: When I open an issue, several fields become active, one of which is the description field where the user who sent the issue typed the description of their problem. When editing the issue and the active fields become active, sometimes this description field is completely blank, meaning their description is gone, but not really. I have to close the page and try to re-open hoping this time, the description will be shown. Also, there is a tab for me to enter a resolution when I want to close it. I cannot enter anything in this field, or rather I can, but when I save it, nothing gets saved to this field, so the user doesn't get to see my resolution. The default font for ServiceDesk is Arial, but I know something is amiss because the default font is Times. If the font shows as Arial, then I know everything will be okay.

I knew I would figure this out as soon as I posted it...
This is the behavior you see if the SamAccountName field is not included.

Search Results not working as expected with Site.URL Filter

I have a page (SharePoint 2013 - Foundation) with a search Results web part. In that web part I have added a filter to limit the results to the specific site (and it's children). So my Query text is:
{searchboxquery} Path:{Site.URL}*
This works.. except for one thing. I'm guessing here but I think the "Site.URL" is returning the site that contains the search results page and not the site that actually started the search!
What I'm trying to do is mimic the default search behavior where a search only contains results from the current site down. So for example
\sites\mySite\mySubSite
If I'm on mySite and search, I should get everything from mySite + mySubSite. However if I am in the mySubSite when I search, I should only get results from mySubSite and NOT the parent mySite.
Added info:
the actual 'search center' is at the \sites\mysite level. Per MS documentation it states that {Site.URL} is the site from where the query was issued. To me that means that if I am on \mysite\mySubSite and initiate the search there, that it should only include
results mySubSite which it is not doing
Here is a screen shot.. I should not be getting any hits

Hi,
In SharePoint 2013, we could configure Result source to limit searched to certain content or to a subset of search results. This would be equal to a new search scope in SharePoint 2010.
For your reference:
http://technet.microsoft.com/library/jj683115(v=office.15)
http://blogs.technet.com/b/tothesharepoint/archive/2012/10/09/build-a-specialized-search-experience-in-minutes-with-sharepoint-2013.aspx
Using sample below will limit search result in subsite:
{searchTerms} path:http://sp/sites/mysite/subsite
Regards,
Rebecca Tu
TechNet Community Support

Import-CSV | New-ADGroup not working as expected with Powershell

I've looked all over and I can't seem to find an explanation for why this command works perfectly with New-ADUser but not with New-ADGroup.
These are commands I'm using:
For Users:
Import-CSV C:\Imports\adusers.csv | New-ADUser
This works great. All 500+ users imported with all fields.
For Groups:
Import-CSV C:\Imports\adgroups.csv | New-ADGroup
Only the first line is run correctly. Then I get this error: The specified group already exists
Here is a snip of my CSV for Groups:
Name,DisplayName,Description,GroupCategory,GroupScope,Path
DB Users,DB Users,Group for DB users,Global,"OU=Security Groups,OU=ABC Users,DC=domain,DC=local"
Accounting,Accounting,Access to the Accounting folder,Security,Global,"OU=Security Groups,OU=ABC Users,DC=domain,DC=local"
Am I missing something here or is this not possible?
THanks.

I knew I would figure this out as soon as I posted it...
This is the behavior you see if the SamAccountName field is not included.

Tabs not working as expected with centred text

Hi,
I'm trying to make a contents page in Indesign but having trouble with aligning the text correctly.
I want the page titles to be centered but when I select the paragraph style onto centered the text moves away from the Tab stop keeping it in the right place - - the result of this is each page title in the column is in a slightly different place. If I leave the paragraph style on left align the page title stays by the tab stop where I expect it to but I don't like how it looks!
Note in the examples below how in the centered example the S has moved over to the right away from the Tab stop.
Any suggestions?
Many thanks,
Adrian
E.g. left aligned
e.g. 2 centered

My first thought is that tabs don't mix well with centered text and you should use one or more fixed-width spaces between the number and the title, but I'm not really sure what look you want.

Hudson not working as expected with Polling SVN Change

Hi John Stegeman,
Thanks for the great OTN ADF essentials series. It is easy to follow and everything is light weight and working great except part 7 (http://www.oracle.com/technology/pub/articles/adf-development-essentials/part7.html).
When I followed your setup with Poll SCM for once every minute for commits, the build is invoked once every minute even when no commits to SVN. The builds are all successful but in an infinite loop.
I am using latest Hudson 1.349.
How can I resolve this issue, i.e., to ensure that build only occurs when there is a commit?
Mingsheng
Edited by: mixie on Mar 10, 2010 7:48 AM

Hi mixie,
I've not seen this problem before on Hudson, but I have on other CI servers - one thing to check is to make sure the date/time on the SVN server and on the Hudson server are in sync - the time I saw this problem is when the times were out of sync and when the CI server asked SVN, "tell me whether there have been any commits since <last_build_time>" the answer was "yes" because <last_build_time> was far in the past.
Otherwise, you might want to try asking on the [url http://wiki.hudson-ci.org/display/HUDSON/Mailing+List]Hudson Mailing List
John

Xfa.host.print not working as expected with Reader8!?

Hello,
I have a two pages form created a while ago with Designer 7.1. When the Print button in the form is clicked, only the last page is printed. We now upgraded to Reader 8.0, and I tested my forms with it. All works fine except the print-out. It always prints both pages. It seems that the properties set in xfa.host.print are totally ignored. Any one having the same problem? Does somebody know the reason or a workaround for that?
Thanks!
Kind regards, Karin

Hello Ivan,
I got a response: It is a bug in Reader 8.0. It should be fixed in Reader 8.1
Regards, Karin

Silverlight 5 binding on a property with logic in its setter does not work as expected when debug is attached

My problem is pretty easy to reproduce.
I created a project from scratch with a view model.
As you can see in the setter of "Age" property I have a simple logic.
public class MainViewModel : INotifyPropertyChanged
public event PropertyChangedEventHandler PropertyChanged;
private int age;
public int Age
get
return age;
set
/*Age has to be over 18* - a simple condition in the setter*/
age = value;
if(age <= 18)
age = 18;
OnPropertyChanged("Age");
public MainViewModel(int age)
this.Age = age;
private void OnPropertyChanged(string propertyName)
if (this.PropertyChanged != null)
PropertyChanged(this, new PropertyChangedEventArgs(propertyName));
In the MainPage.xaml
<Grid x:Name="LayoutRoot" Background="White">
<TextBox
Text="{Binding Path=Age, Mode=TwoWay}"
HorizontalAlignment="Left"
Width="100"
Height="25"/>
<TextBlock
Text="{Binding Path=Age, Mode=OneWay}"
HorizontalAlignment="Right"
Width="100"
Height="25"/>
</Grid>
And MainPage.xaml.cs I simply instantiate the view model and set it as a DataContext.
public partial class MainPage : UserControl
private MainViewModel mvm;
public MainPage()
InitializeComponent();
mvm = new MainViewModel(20);
this.DataContext = mvm;
I expect that this code will limit set the Age to 18 if the value entered in the TextBox is lower than 18.
Scenario: Insert into TextBox the value "5" and press tab (for the binding the take effect, TextBox needs to lose the focus)
Case 1: Debugger is attached =>
TextBox value will be "5" and TextBlock value will be "18" as expected. - WRONG
Case 2: Debugger is NOT attached =>
TextBox value will be "18" and TextBlock value will be "18" - CORRECT
It seems that when debugger is attached the binding does not work as expected on the object that triggered the update of the property value. This happens only if the property to which we are binding has some logic into the setter or getter.
Has something changed in SL5 and logic in setters is not allowed anymore?
Configuration:
VisualStudio 2010 SP1
SL 5 Tools 5.1.30214.0
SL5 sdk 5.0.61118.0
IE 10
Thanks!

Inputting the value and changing it straight away is relatively rare.
Very few people are now using Silverlight because it's kind of deprecated...
This is why nobody has reported this.
I certainly never noticed this problem and I have a number of live Silverlight systems out there.
Some of which are huge.
If you want a "fix":
private void OnPropertyChanged(string propertyName)
if (this.PropertyChanged != null)
//PropertyChanged(this, new PropertyChangedEventArgs(propertyName));
Storyboard sb = new Storyboard();
sb.Duration = new Duration(new TimeSpan(0, 0, 0, 0, 100));
sb.Completed += delegate
PropertyChanged(this, new PropertyChangedEventArgs(propertyName));
sb.Begin();
The fact this works is interesting because (I think ) it means the textbox can't be updated at the point the propertychanged is raised.
Please don't forget to upvote posts which you like and mark those which answer your question.
My latest Technet article - Dynamic XAML

Subtraction of two key figures normalized to result not working as expected

Hello SAP Community!
I am having problems with getting the right result from a subtraction of two KFs which are "normalized to results" which means the KFs really have values expressed as percentages. The substraction that should be performed is of two percentages (e.g.: 87.298% - 85.527% = 1.77%) but my report prints out the result as "number of units" instead (e.g.: 87.298% - 85.527% = 71,514.00 EA). The two normalized KFs actually "point" to two stock KFs, hence the "number of units".
In order to explain the problem I am facing please analyze below text:
1) Let's assume I have below data:
LOAD MONTH PLANT    MATERIAL HORIZON MONTH     FORECAST UNITS
200805         PLANT-A MAT-1            200805         510,235.00
200805         PLANT-B MAT-1           200805          74,240.00
200805         PLANT-A MAT-1           200806         438,721.00
200805         PLANT-B MAT-1           200806          74,240.00
200805         PLANT-A MAT-1           200807         356,981.00
200805         PLANT-B MAT-1           200807          74,240.00
200806         PLANT-A MAT-1           200805               0.00
200806         PLANT-B MAT-1           200805               0.00
200806         PLANT-A MAT-1           200806         510,235.00
200806         PLANT-B MAT-1           200806          74,240.00
200806         PLANT-A MAT-1           200807         438,721.00
200806         PLANT-B MAT-1           200807          74,240.00
2) Then, assume I have a comparison report, restricted by load month for two months May and June 2008 (filter restricted by two month variables) with FORECAST units spread accross columns for whole horizon (two months also in this case).
Material Plant                                 2008/06     2008/07
===================================================================
MAT1      PLANT-A
                   Base Units (May 2008)        438,721.00 356,981.00
                   Comparison Units (June 2008) 510,235.00 438,721.00
          PLANT-B
                   Base Units (May 2008)         74,240.00   74,240.00
                   Comparison Units (June 2008) 74,240.00   74,240.00
          TOTALS   Base Units                   512,961.00 431,221.00
                   Comparison Units             584,475.00 512,961.00
3) Now, let's suppose we want to know the proportions (%) of Base vs Comparison units, so
we normalize forecats to results an we get the below report:
Material Plant                                 2008/06     2008/07
===================================================================
MAT1      PLANT-A
                   Base Units (May 2008)        438,721.00 356,981.00
                   Base Units % (May 2008)      85.527%     85.527%
                   Comparison Units (June 2008) 510,235.00 438,721.00
                   Comparison Units %(Jun 2008) 87.298%     82.784%
          PLANT-B
                   Base Units (May 2008)         74,240.00   74,240.00
                   Base Units % (May 2008)       14.473%     15.702%
                   Comparison Units (June 2008) 74,240.00   74,240.00
                   Comparison Units %(Jun 2008) 12.702%     17.216%
          TOTALS   Base Units                   512,961.00 431,221.00
                   Comparison Units             584,475.00 512,961.00
4) Finally, let's suppose we want to know the deltas (differences) of Base vs Comparison
units, for both number of units and %. The report now look as below:
Material Plant                                 2008/06     2008/07
===================================================================
MAT1      PLANT-A
                   Base Units (May 2008)        438,721.00 356,981.00
                   Base Units % (May 2008)      85.527%     85.527%
                   Comparison Units (June 2008) 510,235.00 438,721.00
                   Comparison Units %(Jun 2008) 87.298%     82.784%
                   Delta base vs. comp. units % 1.77%       2.74%
                   Delta base vs. comp. units    71,514.00 81,740.00
          PLANT-B
                   Base Units (May 2008)         74,240.00   74,240.00
                   Base Units % (May 2008)       14.473%     15.702%
                   Comparison Units (June 2008) 74,240.00   74,240.00
                   Comparison Units %(Jun 2008) 12.702%     17.216%
                   Delta base vs. comp. units % -1.77%      -2.74%
                   Delta base vs. comp. units         0.00        0.00
          TOTALS   Base Units                   512,961.00 431,221.00
                   Comparison Units             584,475.00 512,961.00
5) PROBLEM:
In my report, the "Delta base vs. comp. units %" is not working as expected and
calculates number of units just as "Delta base vs. comp. units" does instead of calculating the % difference.
So my report looks as follows:
Material Plant                                 2008/06     2008/07
===================================================================
MAT1      PLANT-A
                   Base Units (May 2008)        438,721.00 356,981.00
                   Base Units % (May 2008)      85.527%     85.527%
                   Comparison Units (June 2008) 510,235.00 438,721.00
                   Comparison Units %(Jun 2008) 87.298%     82.784%
                   Delta base vs. comp. units % 71,514.00 81,740.00 <<<WRONG!!
                   Delta base vs. comp. units    71,514.00 81,740.00
          PLANT-B
                   Base Units (May 2008)         74,240.00   74,240.00
                   Base Units % (May 2008)       14.473%     15.702%
                   Comparison Units (June 2008) 74,240.00   74,240.00
                   Comparison Units %(Jun 2008) 12.702%     17.216%
                   Delta base vs. comp. units %       0.00        0.00
                   Delta base vs. comp. units         0.00        0.00
          TOTALS   Base Units                   512,961.00 431,221.00
                   Comparison Units             584,475.00 512,961.00
The formulas are:
a) Delta base vs. comp. units %
Delta base vs. comp. units % = Comparison Units % - Base Units %
b) Delta base vs. comp. units
Delta base vs. comp. units = Comparison Units - Base Units
The KFs
- Comparison Units %
- Base Units %
Are RESTRICTED key figures (restricted to Base and comparison month variables) which
are setup as:
1) Calculate Result As: Summation of Rounded Values
2) Calculate Single Value as: Normalization of result
3) Calculate Along the Rows
The KFs
- Delta base vs. comp. units %
- Delta base vs. comp. units
are FORMULAS setup to:
1) Calculate Result As: Nothing defined
2) Calculate Single Value as: Nothing defined
3) Calculate Along the Rows: user default direction (grayed out)
Thanks for the time taken to read in detail all of this. Long text but necessary to understand what the problem is.
Any help is highly appreciated.
Thank you.
Mario

Hi,
The subraction will be carried out before doing the normalization of your KF's. So, it is displaying "number of units". Create a calculated keyfigure and subtract the KF's and in the properties of this calculated keyfigure, change the enhancement as "After Aggregation".
I hope this will solve your issue.
Regards,
S P.

Events in SubVi not working as expected

Hi, I am reposting this question as my previous one didn't resulted in any satisfactory conclusion.
I have attached my Vi's which are not working as expected. If I remove ONE subVi and its associated 3 controls and two indicators, the other one works just fine, but when I add two SUB Vis, it goes messy. I am trying to learn this way, I am sure it can be done many other ways, but please help me finding out the problem doing it this way as in my final MainVi, I would like to use 8 such sub Vis. Thanks.
Solved!
Go to Solution.
Attachments:
Main.vi ‏11 KB
SubVi.vi ‏12 KB
SubVi_2.vi ‏15 KB

Your main problem is DATA FLOW. A loop cannot iterate until EVERYTHING in it has completed. So, as you have it, you have to have both event structures execture before you can go back to look for the next event. So if you insist on having these subVIs, they need to be in seperate loops.
BTW, you can get away with a single subVI. Go into the VI properties and make it reentrant (preallocated clone). Then each call of your subVI will have its own memory space. A lot easier to maintain that way.
And I know you said you didn't want alternatives, but here's how you can do it all with a single event structure in your main loop.
There are only two ways to tell somebody thanks: Kudos and Marked Solutions
Unofficial Forum Rules and Guidelines
Attachments:
Main_MODTR.vi ‏10 KB

AFS ARUN Size Substitution Not Working As Expected

Hi All,
I need help with this. If any one of you have worked with AFS ARUN size substitution, kindly provide me with some details on how can I set it up. I am specially interested in setting up size substitution with two-dimensional grids.
I have setup some examples but it does not work as expected.
Here is a small example:
Say I have a size 28/30, 28/32 .........29/30....
What I want to achieve is that during ARUN if there is a shortage of stock in 28/30 then the remaining requirement qty should be confirmed from size 28/32.
with my setup after 28/30 it goes into looking for stock in 29/30, which is what I do not want.
Any inputs will be really appreciated.
Thanks!!

srdfrn wrote:
Hi YOS,
I tried importing a PCX image into CVI 2010 and then sizing the image to the control and didn't see the behavior you have been describing. Would you mind posting an example (alongside an image file) that demonstrates this?
Also, one thing I noticed is that PCX images appear to be quite dated. Could upgrading them to a JPEG or PNG format be an option for you?
Thanks,
Stephanie R.
National Instruments
Stephanie, thanks for the reply.
I am very sorry to state that I made a mistake.
VAL_SIZE_TO_IMAGE indeed works.
What fails to work is VAL_SIZE_TO_PICTURE. (Second option in Fit Mode attribute in control editing panel)
I tried with JPEG and it's the same.
I am attaching an example.(Load_Image.c & ONEP_3Trow_POS1.JPG)
A panel with two picture rings.
- SW_1 remains at the intended size and the loaded picture is not clear.
- SW_2 will fit to picture size and looks OK.
Appreciate your support,
YOSsi Seter
Attachments:
Load_Image.c ‏2 KB
ONEP_3Trow_POS1.JPG ‏4 KB

Notification "Launch the app and go to the library" not working as expected

Hello,
we are sending notification "Launch the app and go to the library" - but it's not working as expected, it's still just launching app with last open folio.
Whats wrong there? Do we need v30 app? We have V29, but this is not mentioned in documentation.
Thanks
Martin

Ah.
Ok, now it's clear.
Anyway i would appreciate possibility to force viewer to switch to library view after new issue is detected, even without notification. Quite often requested feature - "there is new cover in Newsstand, but customer don't know how to download new publication easily".
Martin

Container-Managed Transaction Type Attributes not working as expected

I am having a problem with the container-managed transactions not working as expected. I have 2 methods that work as follows:
MethodA{
for(a lot)
call MethodB;
@Transaction Type = RequiresNew
MethodB{
EntityManager Persist to database
I want the code in MethodB to be committed to the database when methodB returns. The problem is that I am running out of memory and MethodA is failing. When methodA fails after numerous calls to MethodB nothing is persisted to the database.
It is my understanding that when using requires new transactions that a new transaction is started for each call to the method and ends when the method returns while the calling method transaction is suspended.
How am I misunderstanding the requiresNew transaction attribute. What can I do to make a batch insert into my database that will not run out of memory (commit when a methodB returns)?
Thanks in advance.

The problem is that EJB invocation semantics for security, container-managed transactions, etc.
only apply when an invocation is made through an EJB reference. In your case, you are directly
invoking the implementation method from within the bean. The EJB container has no idea that's
happening. It's no different than invoking a utility method.
In order to get the behavior you'd like, you need to retrieve a reference to your own bean and invoke
through that. You can use SessionContext.getBusinessObject() to get the EJB reference for the
business interface through which the method in question is exposed.
--ken

Namespaces not working as expected

Hi, I've got problems with namespaces not working as expected. When I isolate a process into a new network and mount namespace, a newly mounted file system will be visible to all processes.
Steps to reproduce:
$ sudo unshare -mn bash
bash# mount -t sysfs sysfs /sys
bash# exit
$ cat /proc/mounts
Result:
/proc/mounts will contain a new line for sysfs. This means the /sys/fs/cgroups directory will appear to be empty as the new sysfs is mounted over the old However you can undo it by
sudo umount /sys
Expected result:
The /sys directory will only be new inside the bash process started using unshare and not anymore once you exit bash.
Did I understand something wrong? Or might this be a bug in the kernel?
Note that when using
unshare -m bash
without isolating the network namespace it will refuse to mount sysfs as it is already mounted or busy. Strange.

Hello, because sysfs is shared, see unshare(1) for more details.

ApplyVAT not working as expected with Incoming payment

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for