Approval Process For Journal Entries

We are increasingly being asked to configure approval process for Journal Entries, especially from our larger customers. A move in the right direction was the addition of Stock. However no such addition was mode for journals. Has anyone developed such a solution or can Development give some indication as to where or if this requirement is on the consideration list.
Responses would be appreciated.
Earl

No replies to closed.

Similar Messages

  • Approval Procedures for Journal Entry

    Hi all,
    My client requirement is that they want to have Approval procedures of Journal Entry. As i know we dont have approval procedures for JE so is there any work around for that. Please let me know waiting for your reply.
    Thanks & Regards,
    Murtuza Ahmed.

    hi murtaza,
    Apply Full Authorization to Journal Vouchers,
    Apply No Authorization to Journal entry for non super users.
    Journal Vouchers can be approved/posted by Super Users.
    Jeyakanthan

  • OIM: Error while deploying Custom Approval Process for Self-Register

    While deploying the Custom Approval Process for Self-Register, i am getting the following error in scac.log file
    Nov 16, 2011 2:48:58 PM oracle.fabric.common.wsdl.SchemaManager isIncrementalBuildSupported
    INFO: XMLSchema incremental build enabled.
    Nov 16, 2011 2:48:58 PM com.collaxa.cube.CubeLogger info
    INFO: validating "ApprovalProcess.bpel" ...
    oracle.jrf.UnknownPlatformException: JRF is unable to determine the current application server platform.
         at oracle.jrf.ServerPlatformSupportFactory.getInstance(ServerPlatformSupportFactory.java:79)
         at oracle.integration.platform.blocks.WLSPlatformConfigurationProvider.<clinit>(WLSPlatformConfigurationProvider.java:44)
         at oracle.integration.platform.blocks.FabricConfigManager.<clinit>(FabricConfigManager.java:155)
         at oracle.integration.platform.blocks.xpath.FabricXPathFunctionResolver.loadXpathFunctions(FabricXPathFunctionResolver.java:271)
         at oracle.integration.platform.blocks.xpath.FabricXPathFunctionResolver.loadXPathConfigFile(FabricXPathFunctionResolver.java:153)
         at oracle.integration.platform.blocks.xpath.FabricXPathFunctionResolver.init(FabricXPathFunctionResolver.java:51)
         at com.collaxa.cube.xml.xpath.BPELXPathFunctionNameResolver.loadFabricXpathFunctions(BPELXPathFunctionNameResolver.java:57)
         at com.collaxa.cube.xml.xpath.BPELXPathFunctionNameResolver.<init>(BPELXPathFunctionNameResolver.java:48)
         at com.collaxa.cube.xml.xpath.BPELXPathFunctionNameResolver.<clinit>(BPELXPathFunctionNameResolver.java:44)
         at com.collaxa.cube.lang.compiler.bpel.XPathExprValidatorVisitor.<init>(XPathExprValidatorVisitor.java:122)
         at com.collaxa.cube.lang.compiler.bpel.AssignValidator.<init>(AssignValidator.java:89)
         at com.collaxa.cube.lang.compiler.bpel.BpelParser.<init>(BpelParser.java:452)
         at com.collaxa.cube.lang.compiler.bpel.BPELValidator.validate(BPELValidator.java:60)
         at com.collaxa.cube.lang.compiler.BPEL1Processor.validate(BPEL1Processor.java:329)
         at com.collaxa.cube.lang.compiler.BPEL1Processor.process(BPEL1Processor.java:153)
         at com.collaxa.cube.lang.compiler.CubeParserHelper.compile(CubeParserHelper.java:47)
         at oracle.fabric.bpel.bpelc.BPELComponentValidator.validate(BPELComponentValidator.java:40)
         at oracle.soa.scac.ValidateComposite.validateComponentTypeServicesReferences(ValidateComposite.java:1117)
         at oracle.soa.scac.ValidateComposite.doValidation(ValidateComposite.java:500)
         at oracle.soa.scac.ValidateComposite.run(ValidateComposite.java:150)
         at oracle.soa.scac.ValidateComposite.main(ValidateComposite.java:135)
    Nov 16, 2011 2:49:00 PM CubeProcessGenerator compile
    WARNING: classpath is: D:\JDev11g\Middleware\jdeveloper\jdev\extensions\oracle.sca.modeler.jar;D:\JDev11g\Middleware\jdeveloper\soa\modules\oracle.soa.fabric_11.1.1\fabric-runtime.jar;D:\JDev11g\Middleware\jdeveloper\soa\modules\oracle.soa.mgmt_11.1.1\soa-infra-mgmt.jar;D:\JDev11g\Middleware\oracle_common\modules\oracle.fabriccommon_11.1.1\fabric-common.jar;D:\JDev11g\Middleware\jdeveloper\soa\modules\oracle.soa.bpel_11.1.1\orabpel.jar;D:\JDev11g\Middleware\jdeveloper\soa\modules\oracle.soa.mediator_11.1.1\mediator_client.jar;D:\JDev11g\Middleware\oracle_common\modules\oracle.mds_11.1.1\mdsrt.jar;D:\OIMPS1\Middleware\oracle_common\modules\oracle.jps_11.1.1\jps-manifest.jar;;D:\OIMPS1\Middleware\Oracle_IDM1\server\workflows\new-workflow\process-template\SelfRegistrationApprovalApp\SelfRegistrationApproval\SCA-INF\classes;D:\OIMPS1\Middleware\Oracle_IDM1\server\workflows\new-workflow\process-template\SelfRegistrationApprovalApp\SelfRegistrationApproval\SCA-INF\classes;D:\OIMPS1\Middleware\Oracle_IDM1\server\workflows\new-workflow\process-template\SelfRegistrationApprovalApp\SelfRegistrationApproval\SCA-INF\gen-classes;D:\OIMPS1\Middleware\Oracle_IDM1\server\workflows\new-workflow\process-template\SelfRegistrationApprovalApp\SelfRegistrationApproval\SCA-INF\lib\oimclient.jar;D:\JDev11g\Middleware\oracle_common\modules\commonj.sdo_2.1.0.jar;D:\JDev11g\Middleware\oracle_common\modules\oracle.fabriccommon_11.1.1\fabric-common.jar;D:\JDev11g\Middleware\oracle_common\modules\oracle.xdk_11.1.0\xmlparserv2.jar;D:\JDev11g\Middleware\jdeveloper\soa\modules\oracle.soa.bpel_11.1.1\bpel1-1-xbeans.jar;D:\JDev11g\Middleware\jdeveloper\soa\modules\oracle.soa.bpel_11.1.1\orabpel-common.jar;D:\JDev11g\Middleware\jdeveloper\soa\modules\oracle.soa.bpel_11.1.1\orabpel.jar;D:\JDev11g\Middleware\jdeveloper\soa\modules\oracle.soa.bpel_11.1.1\bpel_coherence_config.jar;D:\JDev11g\Middleware\jdeveloper\soa\modules\oracle.soa.bpel_11.1.1\orabpel-exts.jar;D:\JDev11g\Middleware\jdeveloper\soa\modules\oracle.soa.bpel_11.1.1\thirdparty.jar;D:\JDev11g\Middleware\jdeveloper\soa\modules\oracle.soa.bpel_11.1.1\bpm-analytics.jar;D:\JDev11g\Middleware\jdeveloper\soa\modules\oracle.soa.bpel_11.1.1\orabpel-thirdparty.jar;D:\JDev11g\Middleware\jdeveloper\soa\modules\oracle.soa.bpel_11.1.1\wsif-binding.jar;D:\JDev11g\Middleware\jdeveloper\soa\modules\oracle.soa.bpel_11.1.1\orabpel-validator.jar;D:\JDev11g\Middleware\jdeveloper\soa\modules\oracle.soa.bpel_11.1.1\monitor-rt-xbean.jar;D:\JDev11g\Middleware\jdeveloper\soa\modules\oracle.soa.bpel_11.1.1\oracle.soa.bpmn.jar;D:\JDev11g\Middleware\jdeveloper\soa\modules\user-patch.jar;D:\JDev11g\Middleware\jdeveloper\soa\modules\oracle.soa.thirdparty.jar;D:\JDev11g\Middleware\jdeveloper\uddi\lib\oracle.soa.uddi.jar;D:\JDev11g\Middleware\jdeveloper\soa\modules\oracle.soa.fabric_11.1.1\bpm-infra.jar;D:\JDev11g\Middleware\jdeveloper\soa\modules\oracle.soa.fabric_11.1.1\testfwk-xbeans.jar;D:\JDev11g\Middleware\jdeveloper\soa\modules\oracle.soa.fabric_11.1.1\fabric-ext.jar;D:\JDev11g\Middleware\jdeveloper\soa\modules\oracle.soa.fabric_11.1.1\soa-infra-scheduler.jar;D:\JDev11g\Middleware\jdeveloper\soa\modules\oracle.soa.fabric_11.1.1\xmlunit-1.1.jar;D:\JDev11g\Middleware\jdeveloper\soa\modules\oracle.soa.fabric_11.1.1\fabric-runtime.jar;D:\JDev11g\Middleware\jdeveloper\soa\modules\oracle.soa.fabric_11.1.1\soa-infra-tools.jar;D:\JDev11g\Middleware\jdeveloper\soa\modules\oracle.soa.fabric_11.1.1\soa-xpath-exts.jar;D:\JDev11g\Middleware\jdeveloper\soa\modules\oracle.soa.fabric_11.1.1\oracle-soa-client-api.jar;D:\JDev11g\Middleware\jdeveloper\soa\modules\oracle.soa.wls.jar;D:\JDev11g\Middleware\jdeveloper\soa\modules\oracle.soa.fabric_11.1.1\fabric-client.jar;D:\JDev11g\Middleware\jdeveloper\soa\modules\oracle.soa.fabric_11.1.1\fabric-runtime-ext-was.jar;D:\JDev11g\Middleware\jdeveloper\soa\modules\oracle.soa.fabric_11.1.1\fabric-runtime-ext-wls.jar;D:\JDev11g\Middleware\jdeveloper\soa\modules\oracle.soa.fabric_11.1.1\oracle.soa.fabric.jar;D:\JDev11g\Middleware\jdeveloper\soa\modules\oracle.soa.workflow_11.1.1\bpm-services.jar;D:\JDev11g\Middleware\jdeveloper\soa\modules\oracle.soa.ext_11.1.1\classes
    In scac_out.xml file following is the error message
    <Fault>
    <severity>error</severity>
    <loc>/ns:composite</loc>
    <line/>
    <col/>
    <file/>
    <msg>
    <![CDATA[SCAC-50012]]>
    </msg>
    </Fault>

    Hi,
    I have run into the same problem with SOA 11.1.1.5 version. In my case after fixing the following two errors it seems to work fine.
    If you have followed the guide, there must be some errors:
    First the java code if copied then contains an extra enter value:
    Instead of:
    "try {
    System.out.println("Prototype for invoking an OIM API from a SOA Composite");
    System.out.println("RTM Usecase: Self Registration Approval by Organization
    Administrator");"
    Use the following:
    "try {
    System.out.println("Prototype for invoking an OIM API from a SOA Composite");
    System.out.println("RTM Usecase: Self Registration Approval by Organization Administrator");"
    The other error is that you should not use <BEAHOME>/oracle_common/modules/oracle.jps_11.1.1/jps-manifest.jar, but the <BEAHOME>/oracle_common/modules/oracle.jps_11.1.1/jps-api.jar in jdeveloper. After these the deployment to the application server works fine for me.

  • Creating a file to be used by report ROIUH_LOAD_JEINTF for journal entry

    Hello everyone,
    My doubt is related to the PRA module -
    I have to create a file to be used by program ROiUH_LOAD_JEINTF for journal entry creation. There are other programs also creating a similar file to what I am expected to create.
    When I observe the existing programs, they have not used OPEN DATASET statement, instead directly used the TRANSFER dataset and then CLOSE DATASET.
    What that does is it creates a file on the app server in a different format with only 1 line even if there may be like 10 lines of journal entry. The file mainly contains # which seems like some internal coding by the system.
    When I tried using the OPEN DATASET statement, it wrote all the lines to the app server that were there in my internal table.
    However, when I do not use the OPEN DATASET statement, it creates a file with just one line and maily # instead of the actual data from internal table.
    Can any one explain what difference does it make to the system when we do not use the OPEN DATASET statement.
    You help would be highly appreciated.
    Thanks and Regards,
    Shipra.

    Hello Satish,
    Thank you for your response.
    I think I was not clear enough about my doubt. I do not have any confusion about what OPEN DATASET would do.
    In my case, there is a file being written to the app server without using an OPEN DATASET for OUTPUT statement. The Z program directly calls a TRANSFER statement.
    The file that is created on the app server looks like:
    7042008-11-01                   000200100840 ######RD##################203               #### #####10012888                #####RI01            MC3                                                                               
    This file is used by the program ROIUH_LOAD_JEINTF. There are several lines in the internal table for Journal Entry creation but only 1 line shows in the file. However, when you debug the program ROIUH_LOAD_JEINTF with the above filename, you would see that it takes up all the JE lines that were passed from the previous program (the Z program) which created this file.
    However, when I changed the Z program to have an OPEN DATASET statement, it had all the lines displayed in the file, the file was very readable.
    I just wanted to know how does the system write to app server when no OPEN DATASET statement is written in the program.
    Hope I am clear this time. Thanks again.
    Regards,
    Shipra.

  • Series not defined for journal entry

    Hello Sir
    I have defined two series namely "SCPL"  and "New1"
                    Start No    Last No
    SCPL        10001       3000
    New1         3001        30000  
    Now i have made "SCPL" series as default for A/R Invoices and "New1" series as default for rest of the documents like A/R Credit memo,Journal Entry  etc...  
    Now when I try to add an A/R Invoice , it gives me error message "Series not defined for journal entry"..??    But i have defined New1 series as default for Journal Entry

    Hi,
    In the series defined for journal entry,set document series as default for which default journal entries will be posted automatically.
    Ex.For delivey,return,invoice journal entry will be generated automatically,so if you a series like JESYS08 indicating system automated journal entry.This series should be set as default.
    If you have further issue let me know.

  • DTW - Series not deifned for Journal Entry

    2007B
    Importing AP invoices thru DTW.
    using Document Series
    The document series assigned for AP Invoice is "APINV" and the same document series is selected for JE also.
    The code for APINV is "7"
    The field in DTW to define the document series is "Series" and the series code is given (eg : "7")
    DTW gives error "series not defined for Journal Entry Application defined or object defined.."
    where as when tried to create an AP Invoice manually, it was successful.
    what could be the issue?
    vijay

    I managed to find the issue.
    IN the DTW template,
    the field, "handwritten' was tYES, which I changed to tNO as we follow document series and numbering series.
    nothing is entered in the  'docnum' field.
    now I get the error " to generate this document, first define document series'
    vijay

  • Approval-process for publishing documents in Collaboration-Room

    Hi @ all,
    is it possible to use a approval-process for publishing documents form the private document store of a collaboration room to the public one? I it is, how I have to do it, I have no idea?!?
    Or is there a way to give specific users the right to publish a document.
    Thanks for your response!
    Best regards
    Kai

    Kai -
    I'm not sure about publishing from private to public.  However, you can set-up folders in the Collaboration rooms to enable State Management.  To do this, you'll need to use a system principal to alter the permissions on the specific Collaboration room document folder.
    Regards,
    Kyle

  • Approval Process For MIRO

    Hi All,
    Can we have approval process for MIRO?
    I know that It can not be done through REL Strategy.
    I have come to know from some of the threads that it can be handled through work flow. KIndly provide the process how it is handled through workflow.
    Thanks
    Nitesh

    Hi Nitesh,
    Thro' MIR7, the invoice can be saved as complete (not parking) by the end user.
    Thro' MIRO, the same invoice can be pulled and save as completed again by the relevant authority.
    Unless it is confirmed in MIRO, MIR7 doc. can not be used for making payment.
    Please check whether this route can be of use.
    Regards,
    Siva

  • Approval process for Scrapping of asset

    Dear SAP Gurus,
    In our present client, there is a requirement is to have approval process for scrap inside SAP.  And only on receipt of proper approval, the  scrap should be posted and accounting should be generated.Please  advice if it is possible to do so in standard SAP.
    Many Thanks

    In standard asset accounting this is not available.  An option for this is to set-up a workflow for the appoval proces

  • How to set up approval process for test case in SAP solution manager?

    Hi Experts,
    We need to setup a 2 level approval process for test case documents in SAP Solution Manager.
    e.g. If test case document is uploaded for transaction "MM01" then first it will go to Reviewer1. Once Reviewer1 approves it , should go to Reviewer2.
    Adn finally once reviewer2 approves it , it will be complete.
    What are the required configurations and steps for approval process setup? It will be helpful if screenshots and detailed steps are provided.
    Thanks.
    regards,
    Sanjana

    Hi,
    the above requirement we are going develop add on.below code is there. in this code how we can set for line level amount instead of document total amount
    Private Function GetCondition(ByVal sCondition As String) As ApprovalTemplateConditionTypeEnum
            Try
                Select Case sCondition
                    Case "Deviation from Credit Limit"
                        Return (ApprovalTemplateConditionTypeEnum.atctDeviationFromCreditLine)
                    Case "Deviation from Commitment"
                        Return (ApprovalTemplateConditionTypeEnum.atctDeviationFromObligo)
                    Case "Gross Profit %"
                        Return (ApprovalTemplateConditionTypeEnum.atctGrossProfitPercent)
                    Case "Discount %"
                        Return (ApprovalTemplateConditionTypeEnum.atctDiscountPercent)
                    Case "Deviation from Budget"
                        Return (ApprovalTemplateConditionTypeEnum.atctDeviationFromBudget)
                    Case "Total Document"
                        Return (ApprovalTemplateConditionTypeEnum.atctTotalDocument)
                End Select
            Catch ex As Exception
                MsgBox(ex.Message())
            End Try
        End Function
    Please guide me.
    Regds,
    Samapth Kumar.

  • Approval for Journal Entries

    Hello Experts,
    Is it possible to apply approval templates for a journal entry??If yes how??

    Hi Divya..........
                Its not possible to have approval procedure for JEs
    For that you have to use journal vouchers where in you can save the JEs and get it approve from the authorised person.
    Regards,
    Rahul

  • Approval process for changes in BAsic infotype

    Dear Gurus,
    The customer wants approval process whenever hr changes BASIC infotype, a mail shpuld go to his superior, who will approve the request in the system.
    - We are not implementing Workflow, ESS.
    - Enqueue / Dequeue concept does not work with Time constraint 1.
    - We are not in favour of changing time constraint of BASIC infotype
    How can we handle this situation thru GUI client ?
    Regards,
    Vijay Badgeri

    Hi Kapil/Sikandar,
    Thank you for the reply.
    As per my understanding, the steps involved would be:
    1. The dynamic action will be triggered during "Change in Pay" action.
    2. HR executive will make necessary changes in IT0001, IT0008, IT0014.
    3. Dynamic action is triggered when IT0008 is updated.
    4  Current values & new values of IT0008 & IT0014 are moved to workflow container and create workflow request to the HR Manager.
    5. On approval of workflow request by HR Manager, the IT0008, IT0014 get updated.
    my doubts are :
    1. What would be the status of action till manager approves?
    2. Will HR Admin be able to see the entries made by him ?
           (In Finance we have PARK option, is there any such option in HR?)
    3. Would the dynamic action triggered if bulk "Change in Pay" actions are generated thru BDC/LSMW ?
    Pl let me know...
    Warm Regards,
    Vijay Badgeri

  • N-step approval process for PO in SRM 7

    Here are a couple of questions I have regarding N-Step approval configuration for PO in SRM 7 Process Controlled Workflow:
    1) It's our business requirement that the last-change person of the PO is defined as the first approver in the chain. I tested with RR_EMPLOYEE and a hard-coded user BP number (my own), but got error "Strategy RR_EMPLOYEE did not determine any approver". Changing to any other user's BP number worked. So I am guessing the buyer himself can not be an approver. Since this is a business requirement, we wouldn't mind developing enhancement to work around this restriction. If you could point me to the place where this is checked, that would help me.
    2) I have set up the process level configuration as such:
    100     ZEV_PO_SL_APPR_001     PO  approval level 1     RR_EMPLOYEE     Specify Employee for Approval
    200     ZEV_PO_SL_APPR_002     PO  approval level 2     RR_MANAGER     Get Creator's Line Manager for Approval
    300     ZEV_PO_SL_APPR_003     PO  approval level 3     RR_MANAGER     Get Creator's Line Manager for Approval
    The corresponding expressions are simply checking against the PO total value, such as -
    0V_PO_POTOTALVALUE >= 0 AND 0V_PO_POTOTALVALUE < 1,000
    0V_PO_POTOTALVALUE >= 1,000 AND 0V_PO_POTOTALVALUE < 25,000
    0V_PO_POTOTALVALUE >= 25,000
    But when I checked the Approver list with a PO with total value > 50,000, only the first level is triggered and listed. And once approved, the PO went into "Ordered" status. But it should have gone through 3 levels of approval. I'd greatly appreciate it if you could point out what might have been wrongly defined in my configuration.
    Thanks!

    Hi,
      1) It's our business requirement that the last-change person of the PO is defined as the first approver in the chain. I tested with RR_EMPLOYEE and a hard-coded user BP number (my own), but got error "Strategy RR_EMPLOYEE did not determine any approver". Changing to any other user's BP number worked. So I am guessing the buyer himself can not be an approver. Since this is a business requirement, we wouldn't mind developing enhancement to work around this restriction. If you could point me to the place where this is checked, that would help me.
    SAP recently released the consultant OSS note to handle this issue.. when the release the SRM 7.0 , SC requestor or PO creator ( Buyer ) cant be in the approval list.. later on they release a OSS note to handle this issue.. 1551561\
    2) I have set up the process level configuration as such:
    100     ZEV_PO_SL_APPR_001     PO  approval level 1     RR_EMPLOYEE     Specify Employee for Approval
    200     ZEV_PO_SL_APPR_002     PO  approval level 2     RR_MANAGER     Get Creator's Line Manager for Approval
    300     ZEV_PO_SL_APPR_003     PO  approval level 3     RR_MANAGER     Get Creator's Line Manager for Approval
    The corresponding expressions are simply checking against the PO total value, such as -
    0V_PO_POTOTALVALUE >= 0 AND 0V_PO_POTOTALVALUE < 1,000
    0V_PO_POTOTALVALUE >= 1,000 AND 0V_PO_POTOTALVALUE < 25,000
    0V_PO_POTOTALVALUE >= 25,000
    But when I checked the Approver list with a PO with total value > 50,000, only the first level is triggered and listed. And once approved, the PO went into "Ordered" status. But it should have gone through 3 levels of approval. I'd greatly appreciate it if you could point out what might have been wrongly defined in my configuration.
    once you implement the OSS note Q1, you can build the custom RR resolver to handle this issue with in one process level.. but you have to implement the process level BADI as well.. please refer /SAPSRM/BD_WF_PROCESS_PO badi for more details
    Saravanan

  • Creation of auto approval process for assigning role for a user in oim11g

    currently i'm doing a scenario like a user must be automatically assigned to a role by using approval policy where the user is already there in oim and then we use csv file in that we take 2 columns like userlogin and role name so by running this scheduled task user must be automatically approved to that role.But i have to use the default auto approve policy in oim without creating any bpel process for that so can any one suggest me how to proceed with this scenario.
    Thanks in Advance for quick response.

    If I understand correctly, You have users and their respective roles in csv file. Users are present in OIM. You want to assign those roles in csv file to respective users?
    If this is the scenario, you need to write a custom code for schedule task which will read data from your csv file, create roles and assign them to respective users.
    to create custom schedule task in OIM 11g, you may refer to:
    http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E21764_01/doc.1111/e14308/scheduler.htm
    regards,
    GP

  • Add-On connection for Journal Entry - Failed to Connect to SBO Common

    We have a customer (SAPBO 2005A SP01 PL29) with some specific requirements that required an add-on running in the background to monitor the addition of Goods Receipt PO's to the system. When the GRPO is successfully added, the Add-On will (behind the scenes) create an appropriate Journal Entry through the SAP DI. One of the issues that we encountered during the development of this functionality was that when it was tested by users, they weren't authorized to access the Financials module or the Journal Entry screen. What we ended up doing was creating a secondary connection (vCompany) in the DL pulling the information from the encrypted user information from SAP the Add-On used to connect, but utilizing a management level user ID and password. Once that connection has been made, the Journal Entry is added through the DI and that secondary connection is disconnected.
    The problem that we're encountering is this. When the users are logged into SAP Client with an regular user, and the GRPO adds, the secondary connection fails and returns a message of "Failed to Connect to SBO-Common". However, if the user is logged into SAP as an adminitrative level user and the GRPO is added, the secondary connection is successful and the Journal Entry is created. The secondary connection is strictly used for the JE. Here's the code (VS.Net 2005) for the secondary connection:
    vCompany = New SAPbobsCOM.Company
    vCompany.UseTrusted = True
    vCompany.language = SAPbobsCOM.BoSuppLangs.ln_English
    vCompany.CompanyDB = oCompany.CompanyDB
    vCompany.UserName = "XXXXX"
    vCompany.Password = "YYYYY"           
    vCompany.Server = oCompany.Server
    vCompany.DbServerType = SAPbobsCOM.BoDataServerTypes.dst_MSSQL2005
    lRetConnect = vCompany.Connect()
    Where "XXXXX" would be the appropriate management level SAP User Name and "YYYYY" would be that users password.
    Has anyone else had this kind of issue where you needed a secondary connection with management level access behind the scenes to accomplish something in SAP and had problems getting it to connect? Any thoughts or ideas would be greatly appreciated.

    Hi Dennis,
    what you can try is to make a untrusted connection
    oCompany.UseTrusted = False
    and set the DBUser and Pwd
    oCompany.DbUserName = "sa"
    oCompany.DbPassword = "insertpwd"
    lg David

Maybe you are looking for