Approval tasks showing incorrect approval by xelsysadm

Hi!
We discovered a strange behaviour with approval tasks and assignment adapters.
We configured an Approval Process with three approval tasks. The first one is approved by the target user's manager. The second one is approved by a group, determined by the Assignment Adapter. And the third is approved by a fixed group.
When the requester starts the request, chooses three or four Resources, that uses these Approval Processes. If the manager, in the first approval step, chooses to approve all tasks simultaneously (checkbox Select All, and Approve button), then one of the task is showed as being approved by the manager, while the remaining are showed as being approved by Xelsysadm, which is not the target user's manager, ofcourse. Then, the worflow continues normally.
Curious thing is that, if we replace the Assignment Adapter in the second approval with a fixed group or user, then the first approval always is correctly recorded as approved by the manager.
We also tried with different Assignment Adapters, but always with the same result.
Has anyone stepped with this issue already?
We are using OIM 9.1.0, BP02.
Thanks!
Please, any suggestions to eliminate this problem?
Edited by: Bleid on Aug 19, 2009 10:14 AM

The statuses shown are sometimes misleeding. There is a status for when the approval starts. There is a status when the Standard Approval process completes (this is normally set to auto complete). There there is a status for when the object specific approval starts, a status for if any of the approvals have been completed, and then one for when the whole request is completed. These don't neccessarily provide you with a sure answer to the status of the request.
I think you need to disregard the statuses for now, and just configure the approval tasks as you intend to do so. If you do not want the standard approval to be required, set the Approve task to use the auto complete adapter. Then create an approval process specific to your resource object, and set it to the default. Then create an approval task and make to uncheck the "conditional" checkbox so that it always runs. Set your assignments appropriately, and you will be done. The provisioning will not start until all tasks are completed with a complete status for the tasks within.
If you want to know the statuses between steps, then check those between all of the steps.
-Kevin

Similar Messages

  • Creative Zen (16GB Model) showing incorrect song information

    <Creative Zen (6GB Model) showing incorrect song information I was given a Creative Zen for christmas, and I'm very happy with it.
    The only thing is, I've noticed that it seems to occasionally display the wrong title for the song it's playing. I have a playlist called RandomAll which I created using the Media Explorer software. Sometimes, when I look down at the player, I'll notice the wrong song information on screen. Not just the title or anything, but completely wrong information. For example, right now, my player is telling my that a Rihanna song is playing, and gives me all the details for that song (including the extended details if I go into the menu). But the song that's actually playing is a cover of Fraggle Rock by Me First & The Gimme Gimmes. It doesn't seem to be the same songs every time or anything like that, so I don't think it's a problem with the files.
    Is this an issue that has been noticed by anyone else? Is there anything I can do to fix it's And if not, is it the kind of thing I need to send my player back for?

    @ It could be incorrect ID3 tags on your .mp3s, if the source for your music had the wrong ID3 information, your Zen won't show the correct information unless you use an? ID3 Tag Editor to correct the source.

  • Project Server 2010 - task shows NA as actual finish but zero work remaining?

    So, here's the problem:
    We are running Server 2010, SP1 I believe (Can check this tomorrow when back in the office)
    Users update tasks via PWA but have various options around how they do these updates:
    they are able to update %complete (as a %age of duration)
    they are able to amend task start/finish dates
    they can update no. of work hours remaining
    I believe (based on early testing/investigation) that users are updating an assignment (in PWA) to, say 1% complete (to indicate misguidedly that they are aware of the task and then moving the end date, this then splits the remaining work) and extends the
    duration
    Somehow, what then happens is they update the task (possibly prior to the new end date they have put in) to show zero remaining work but when the schedule is reviewed in MS Project 2010, the Actual Finish Field shows "NA" yet the remaining work
    is zero and the overall task shows not complete.
    I've been investigating this for some time and it's incredibly frustrating. I'm of the opinion that we need to restrict the way our users are able to update assignments and make the view in PWA force them to update  either
    remaining hours or % complete but would really, really appreciate any guidance or other avenues I should investigate?
    Thanks in advance 

    DizietSma,
    Are these tasks of type "Fixed Duration". In that case please check if there is remaining duration on these tasks. I believe that's the root cause. In this scenario the work being completed does not trigger the task to be complete, even if the
    assignment is complete. The only way to mark the task complete, is to incorporate into your task update process, to zero out the remaining duration at the task level.
    As far as the tracking method, looks like you have 'freeform' enabled. I suggest that you change it to one of the methods you listed above, which will help stereamline
    Prasanna Adavi,PMP,MCTS,MCITP,MCT TWitter: @prasannaadavi Blog: http://www.prasannaadavi.com
    The tasks are fixed duration, is "remaining duration" a field I can include in MS Project? Or otherwise include it in the task update view in PWA? Views in PWA are somewhat inconsistent in terms of what can be included for update purposes
    and what cannot.
    Many thanks for your help so far Prasanna

  • From line on emails shows incorrectly

    i belong to a group where i must send an email to the entire group at once, because it is a group mail it will also come to my inbox. the problem is the "from" line shows someone else's email, when i send the same email from my other email client the "from" line shows my email as it should... i have screenshots of both clients... the thunderbird one shows incorrectly. i have contacted the group owner and my emails are not moderated and my email shows as sender on her end.
    why is my thunderbird showing the incorrect email in the "from" line... it is a valid email but it is not mine
    is there a way for me to post screenshots to explain better?

    lets test that shall we.
    Tools menu > options > Advanced > Reading and display and uncheck the "Show only display name for people in my address book" restart Thunderbird
    Does that fix the display issue?

  • Macbook pro shows incorrect storage information on SSD.

    I am using a macbook pro. The storage information is shown wrongly. Control I shows the correct information but finder and space bar on the hard disk show incorrect storage information. Used space is actually 122 GB which is shown as 140 GB. Even omnidiskkeeper shows the breakup of 122 GB but the storage information summary shows 140GB.

       Re-index Macintosh HD.
       Spotlight reindexing will take a while to finish.
       System Preferences > Spotlight > Privacy
       http://support.apple.com/kb/ht2409

  • Crystal report showing Incorrect data against Bex Query

    I have created Crystal report on top of Bex Query, I have not done any calculations in the report, just dragging structure and key figure in the report, ran for one month, when I compare with Bex Query with same period, it is showing incorrect data.
    I don't know what can be wrong here?
    We are Business Objects 3.1 SP3.
    Thanks,
    Ravi

    HI,
    I would suggest you trace the workflow in Web INtelligence according to these notes:
    Tracing:
    Unix : Note 1235111
    Windows : Note 1260004
    and then post a link for downloading the trace files here.
    regards
    Ingo

  • Customer age analysis showing incorrect aging

    Hi All
    We have a rather complicated scenario, we captured journals for customers some of the journals are back dated , so when we check the aging it  has incorrect info on some of the suppliers and others are showing correct info.
    I've checked the payment terms and they are set to 30 days (start from month end + 1 Month)
    Others are showing correct figures under correct columns and others are showing incorrect instead of showing under 0 -30 (correct) and then the others are showing 31 - 60..(incorrect)... they both belong to the same posting month.
    Regards
    Bongani Dlamini

    Hi Bongani Dlamini,
    Your question is not very clear to me.  Which customers are showing incorrect figures?  Any patterns have you notices?  What are the differences you could find it out?
    Thanks,
    Gordon

  • T42 Showing Incorrect Adapter Name in Access Connections

    I am working on a T42 laptop and installed Access Connections 5.12.  I have gone through and did all the prerequisites prior to installation of Access Connections (wireless driver update, UltraNav Driver upgrade, Video Upgrade, BIOS upgrade, LAN driver update, etc).  I have created a profile for a wireless network that is in range and operational.  My problem is the adapter is showing incorrectly within Access Connections.  This wireless adapter is identified correctly in device manager as "11b/g Wireless LAN Mini PCI Adapter".  But in Access Connections, it is showing as "Intel(R) WiFi Link 5300 AGN".  I am needing this to identify the correct adapter to get Access Connections to work.  Any ideas?

    Hi jeremieolson,
    Unless you need to use Access Connections to switch among multiple *wired* networks, I'd suggest simply un-installing Access Connections and using the built-in Windows tools for establishing your wireless connection. Windows will let you establish wireless profiles just like Access Connections does. AFAIK Access Connections doesn't add anything to the built-in Windows wireless networking, and in your case it's misbehaving, so...
    Results of Your Ideal Business-Class Laptop survey, concluded 2009-07-29.
    Did someone help you?
    Say thanks! with a kudo.
    Even better: Pay it forward, help someone else.

  • Widget world clock shows incorrect time

    widget world clock shows incorrect time.. how can i fix this?

    There are two possibilities: (1) your computer's time is wrong. Open System Preferences, select the Date & Time tab, and either set the time manually or select a time server. If you choose the time server click on the Time Zone tab and choose your correct time zone. (2) click on the i on the World Clock widget and select a city near you (that's in the same time zone as yours.)

  • Report Viewer shows incorrect data when viewing pages from last to first

    Post Author: Fmorales
    CA Forum: .NET
    Hello.
    I've made a huge report with Crystal Reports for Visual Studio 2005, and sometimes the Report Viewer show data with errors.
    If I see all pages of my report in order, 1 first, then 2nd, 3, 4... until the last one.... The report is always correct.
    If I see all pages in reverse order, 1 first (shown by default), then last one, then last one-1.... until 2nd.. All years show incorrect, except first one... 
    In an outer section, for every year, there is a final row which shows summarize calculated data. The error consists in that every value of the row is 0.
    It seems that Crystal Report calculates while showing, that's good.. but... Why does it ignore the data before when I see directly the last page?? It forces me to see all pages one by one in ascendant order to ensure data is correct.. I must fix that error.
    The way I calculate data in the problematic summarize row is a bit complicated, but I'll try... Let's focus in one only column (the other ones are similar). The summarize value is a formula which simply show a global value :
    WhilePrintingRecords;
    CurrencyVar margenActual;
    which is being increasing or decreasing along the group:
    WhilePrintingRecords;
    CurrencyVar actual:=actual+CurrentFieldValue; 
    if {PresupPeriodifMesesAux_DS.TIPO} = 'PAGOS' then         CurrencyVar margenActual:=margenActual-CurrentFieldValueelse    CurrencyVar margenActual:=margenActual+CurrentFieldValue;
    DefaultAttribute
    It is placed in the backgrond property of a CrossTab cell in a hidden pre-section... Well.. I know it's a bit complicated, but I have to do that way because it was the only trick I found to make a summarize file before printing data summarized (that's why the line "CurrencyVar actual:=actual+CurrentFieldValue;" appeared in formula). So I also wanted to use this formula to acummulate "margenActual".
    In the inner section I reset the actual value (this value always go fine):
    WhilePrintingRecords;
    CurrencyVar actual:=0; 
    Before end of year I reset the margenActual value:
    WhilePrintingRecords;
    CurrencyVar margenActual:=0; 
    I've tried multiple combinations (using WhileReadingRecords instead WhilePrintingRecords) but data is incorrect or I cannot get rid of visualization page's problem....
    Any idea?
    Thanks a lot

    quote:
    Originally posted by:
    ntsiii
    If you were previously using <mxXML> you WERE using
    e4x.
    So remove that tag, create an instance variable of the same
    name, typed as xml, and in your result handler, do as VarioPegged
    suggests, though I would cast/convert to xml first:
    companies = XML(event.result);
    trace(companies.toXMLString()); to look at your xml
    var xlCompanies:XMLList = xmlCompanies..company; //all such
    expressions return XMLList, never XML
    trace(xmlCompanies.length()); //
    Tracy
    Ok so the ID of the mxXML was being interpreted as an E4X
    variable at compile time?
    I tried changing the name of the ID of the HTTPService call
    from "marketData" to "MDATA" and assigning the variable marketData
    to the result of the HTTPService query, which if I understand you
    correctly should basically make everything work as it was before,
    but it seems to be a problem.
    when I try to run it puts an exclamation point on this line
    <toolbox:TreeMap id="treeMap" width="1200" height="800"
    dataProvider="{marketData}"
    labelField="@cname" weightField="@amount"
    colorFunction="{itemToColor}"
    toolTipFunction="{itemToToolTip}"/>
    That code refers to a SWC file. Apparently it wants
    marketData to be a data provider. If I change the dataProvider
    reference above to "MDATA" (the ID of the HTTPService) the App
    compiles, but I get two errors at runtime:
    TypeError: Error #1009: Cannot access a property or method of
    a null object reference.
    ReferenceError: Error #1081: Property @age1 not found on
    mx.rpc.http.mxml.HTTPService and there is no default value.
    What should I change this reference to? It won't compile if I
    use the variable I made for the e4x results and it is reading
    gibberish if I have it read directly from the
    HTTPService....?

  • Ix2 shows incorrect file size

    The file system appears to report the incorrect file size for files >4g.
    sftp> ls -la
    drwxrwxrwx    2 shane    users          61 Sep  7 12:29 .
    drwxrwxrwx    8 99       users        4096 Sep  6 23:33 ..
    -rw-rw-rw-    1 shane    users    284716889 Sep  7 13:02 KIdsFirstVacation2007.mp4
    If you use a ls -lah command it shows correctly
    sftp> ls -lah
    drwxrwxrwx    0 1000     100           61B Sep  7 07:29 .
    drwxrwxrwx    0 99       100          4.0K Sep  6 18:33 ..
    -rw-rw-rw-    0 1000     100          4.3G Sep  7 08:02 KIdsFirstVacation2007.mp4
    it also shows incorrectly from Filezilla, and from the web browser interface on the NAS

    Hi
    Today is your lucky day dude. Seems I found a solution :D
    Pelase take a look into this forum thread:
    http://forums.computers.toshiba-europe.com/forums/thread.jspa?threadID=19974&messageID=73284
    The user JayJay has provided a link to the Toshiba document which helps to clear this issue.
    This is the original document;
    http://support.toshiba-tro.de/kb0/TSB59014X0000R01.htm
    Please try it and post back if it was the key or not. Good luck

  • ITunes 6.0.2 shows incorrect track lengths, clips track when playing

    I just upgraded to iTunes 6.0.2. In previous versions, iTunes would often show incorrect track lengths on longer tracks, but would play them all the way through, with the time remaining staying at 0:00 until the track finished playing. This new version simply cuts the track off at the incorrect endtime. For example, I have a track with a length of 17:33, but iTunes has always shown it as 17:28. No big deal, it would always play to the end. Now, the new version cuts it off abruptly at 17:28. There seems to be no way to correct the track length. Is there any way to fix the track lengths to their correct times, or get them to at least play all the way through?? These are custom mixes and not from commercial CDs, so simply re-ripping isn't an option.
    Snow iMac G3 500 MHz   Mac OS X (10.4.4)   384 MB RAM

    I have recently accused Emusic.com of supplying truncated tracks only to find that Itunes 6.02 and 6.03 (Mac) is clipping the start and end of the tracks. The counter gives the correct length but the playing is not correct. Fade out / in are off. Playing the offending tracks in quicktime or any other player gives all the track music.
    Looking deeper shows that the tracks in question are all VBR .mp3 tracks (Variable Bit Rate).
    Solutions to date are to either play in another player (not ideal).
    Convert the tracks to fixed bit rate .mp3 using the setting nearest to the highest variable bit rate. Amazingly this works even when the conversion is done in Itunes. Your file size should be same or larger to avoid quality loss.
    On playing the tracks I have converted the counter in Itunes gives the same reading but the tacks are not truncated.
    Some VBR tracks do not seem to have the problem but that is usually because the nature of the track makes it less obvious.
    G4 power mac   Mac OS X (10.4.5)  
    G4 power mac   Mac OS X (10.4.5)  

  • 0weekday1 is showing incorrect values

    Hi,
    After the upgrade it has been noticed that the Time characteristic 0weekday1 is showing incorrect text mapping in Bex Reports reports.
    After analysis and Investigation I found that
    In master data it is maintained as follows which is correct
    1 - Sunday
    2 - Monday
    3 - Tuesday
    4 - Wednesday
    5 - Thursday
    6 - Friday
    7 - Saturday
    But In the multiprovider, when I do F4 on the filed 0weekday1 it is showing the following values
    1 - Monday
    2 - Tuesday
    3 - Wednesday
    4 - Thursday
    5 - Friday
    6 - Saturday
    7 - Sunday.
    In RSRV it is showing inconsistencies but when I tried to do the correction it is failing.
    I have done the info Object repair for 0weekday1 in RSD1. but still the values have not changed.
    Please suggest resolutions to this !!!
    Thanks,
    Shantanu.

    Hi,
    When I see the master data it is maintained properly as stated above.
    But, when I checked the Master Data Read class, it is found that the data is coming from T246 table which is SAP maintained table. And the entries made in T246 table are the one which are incorrectly mapped.
    So, my questions are:
    1. Can we change the values directly in T246 table.
    2. What other programs/objects, etc will be impacted.
    3. Do we have something as "Where used list" for the Tables.
    Thanks,
    Shantanu.

  • Logviewer 1.14 showing incorrect times, and other issues.

    Couple of issues with running LogViewer, wondering if anyone can help.
    First, and seems to be the most frustrating, is that the LogViewer screen is showing incorrect times for the events. I am in Mountain Time zone in the US, which is GMT-7. When looking at the log from a web browser, my router is displaying the correct time. The text file that LogViewer saves on the local computer shows the same correct time. The LogViewer screen, however, shows a time 7 hours into the future. IE, if I type out the log from a DOS window, the last event will say something like "Mar 28 1:15:05 2008", but that same event number will be listed on the logviewer screen as "Mar 28 8:15:05" Any ideas on what may be wrong and how to correct it?
    Second, all events seem to be grouped exactly 3 minutes apart. I realize this is probably an effect of the router sending the information every three minutes. Anyone know of a way of changing that period?
    Hm, just noticed a third, but very minor issue. The text file written has the wrong day of week on it. It's listing Mar 28 2008 as a Wednesday...
    Thanks in advance for any advice.
    OK, the tech info. I am running LogViewer 1.14 on a Windows XP machine, contacting an WRT55AG with firmware 1.20. The connection is through a Cat 5 cable, not through the wireless.

    Couple of issues with running LogViewer, wondering if anyone can help.
    First, and seems to be the most frustrating, is that the LogViewer screen is showing incorrect times for the events. I am in Mountain Time zone in the US, which is GMT-7. When looking at the log from a web browser, my router is displaying the correct time. The text file that LogViewer saves on the local computer shows the same correct time. The LogViewer screen, however, shows a time 7 hours into the future. IE, if I type out the log from a DOS window, the last event will say something like "Mar 28 1:15:05 2008", but that same event number will be listed on the logviewer screen as "Mar 28 8:15:05" Any ideas on what may be wrong and how to correct it?
    Second, all events seem to be grouped exactly 3 minutes apart. I realize this is probably an effect of the router sending the information every three minutes. Anyone know of a way of changing that period?
    Hm, just noticed a third, but very minor issue. The text file written has the wrong day of week on it. It's listing Mar 28 2008 as a Wednesday...
    Thanks in advance for any advice.
    OK, the tech info. I am running LogViewer 1.14 on a Windows XP machine, contacting an WRT55AG with firmware 1.20. The connection is through a Cat 5 cable, not through the wireless.

  • Search results showing incorrect modified date

    Hi All,
    I have a one difficulty in search results.
    Document showing incorrect modified date in search results. And this happens for one document only.
    We have customized the search/results.aspx page, Our document is showing correct modified date in document properties,All Items.aspx like 31/4/2013.
    But when i search with document name in search, result showing incorrect modified date like 24/6/2004.
    I checked with database in SQL, every thing is fine.
    I have updated the Modified date through powershell script for one document and after that this recent modified date is showing in search results.
    But after updating the Modified date through powershell, issued document not showing the recent modified date in search results. still showing as 24/6/2004.
    I should not do edit property and save, to create new version.
    I don't know what is happening in search crawl. All ready full crawl running daily basis.
    I want to check whether this issued document is crawling or not. Could anybody help me to get out of this. what is the main cause of this issue.
    Thanks & Regards
    MD.Liakath ali

    Hi,
    I'm seeing the same issue after upgrading the SharePoint 2010 to SharePoint 2013.
    When I search any upgraded document in SharePoint 2013, the document's "Last Modified Date" was showing an incorrect value in Search Results page but other metadata of document like "Last Modified User" is showing the correct
    value so the problem is not with document crawl, something wrong with Last Modified Date property in Search results.
    I have seen below comment as answer but I didn't understand the solution to fix this issue for all upgraded documents.
    The most likely cause is that there is metadata on the documents that is set to that date which is overriding the other dates in the search result. SharePoint isn't particulary imaginative so it's got to be finding that date from somewhere.
    Do we have any solution for this issue? Is this issue will be addressed in SharePoint 2013 SP1?
    Note: No issues with documents, which uploaded after upgrade.

Maybe you are looking for