Approvals performed through Vacation Rules

Hi there,
I'm trying to build a query report to show same data as PO Action History does but need to add or show user name that had performed any approval as a delegated of main approval user. Which table or view has these data?
Thank you for your help
Regards,

Hi Sudhakar,
It's a application standard functionality. You need to enable the worklist personalization. Do the following steps to enable the worklist.
1. Log in to the application.
2. Click on the Personalization link( before this you need to enable the 1. Personalize Self Service Definition – Yes 2. FND: Personalization Region Link – Yes profile options for your user).
3. Click on the Complete view and then Expand all then search for the "Row Layout: Home Content Row" and click on the personalization torch.
4. Make this rendered at the site level and click apply.
5. Navigate back to the application, now you can view the Worklist in the application.
I hope this will help you to enable the Worlist access and vacation rules.
Thanks and Regards,
Joshna.

Similar Messages

  • Why the PO action history is not updating when i perform the vacation rules

    Hi,
    Can any one explain why the action history is not updating when performed the vacation rules using the below example
    Example: A >B>C>D are in the approval hierarchy here I have defined the vacation rules by login to the user C here I selected the item type as “All” and delegated to D.
    Now the buyer “A” has sent the document for approval. The user “B” can successfully reserve funds and approved the document. Now the document is automatically delegated to D. Here D can open the document from open notifications and approved the document. Now when I checked the Action history here I cannot find the performed name D who has actually approved the document.
    Note:we are using the 11.5.10.2 version.
    The Action History in the following manner
    Seq Action Performed By
    ================================
    4 Approve C
    3 Forward B
    2 Reserved B
    1 Forward A
    0 Submit A
    From the above action history why the user D name is not showing. Can any one let me know ASAP?
    Regards,
    Keivn.
    Edited by: user10960960 on May 5, 2009 3:36 AM

    When you set up the vacation rule, if you simply delegate the ownership to D, then C retains the ownership and the approval occurs with C's limits. And hence D is treated as the approver.
    If you transfer the ownership, then C is out of the picture. The notification goes to D and when he/she approves, D's limits kick in and he will be seen as approver.
    Hope this helps,
    Sandeep Gandhi

  • Webmail Vacation Rule - Mass spam

    We have seen this issue several times now if one of our users enables an existing vacation rule (created in the client) in webmail it will go through and send an email to several (if not hundreds/thousands) of people they have corresponded with within the last month or so. These are not new conversations that are coming in. I can't pinpoint exactly how far back it goes. When we get notified we go in and remove the rule in web access and retract at least all of the internal emails that have gone out. Has anyone else seen this issue before? Is there a way to disable enabling rules in webmail till this gets addressed? Seems if they enable the rule in the client it works properly.
    Thanks,
    Nathan

    Hi Nathan,
    Unfortunately this has been reported before. I believe, but stand to be corrected, this happens when the customer clicks on the "Run" button. I'm not sure if there is a fix for this, but it might be worth contacting Novell Technical Support.
    Let us know how it goes.
    Cheers,

  • Automatic Tasks are assigning to the user even the Vacation rule Enabled

    Hi Experts,
    I have enabled a Vacation rule in bpm/workspace.
    But I can see all the tasks assigned in the inbox for that user.
    Then I have enabled the Customized rule as the vacation rule and tried to reassign the tasks to an another user.
    That is also not happening. Tasks are assigning to the other user.
    Our ECM version is 11.1.1.6.0
    Went through all the documentations and couldn't find the solution..
    Thanks,
    Nir

    Hi Nir,
    When you said
    But I can see all the tasks assigned in the inbox for that user.
    do you mean the instances that were previously assigned to the user are still there in the user's queue?
    Vacation rules let you reassign or delegate tasks assigned to a user once the vacation period begins.  If work items are already in their queue before the vacation rule goes into effect, they remain in the person's queue.  It's up to the user to reassign or delegate the existing work item instances that were already in their queue.
    New instances that arrive once the rule goes into effect however, should be automatically reassigned (or delegated depending on the vacation rule's radio button selected) to the other person.
    Dan Atwood

  • Reg: Vacation rule

    Hi Frnds,
    In vacation rule transfer ownership is working fine for expense report notification but for purchasing approvals it is throwing an error as ORA:20001. Here in this case we should only use delegate that is fine. But, Can anyone suggest that what would be the exact reason why it is working fine for expense report and not for purchasing approvals.
    Regards
    SP

    Please see if these docs help.
    Vacation Rule Is Not Working In Expense Report - Error: "ORA-20001: Exactly one of an approverRecord's person_id and user_id fields must be null." [ID 1299908.1]
    Expense Reports Failing With Ora-06533 Error [ID 1151724.1]
    Unable To Approve An In Process Expense Report After Terminating Employee [ID 782654.1]
    Thanks,
    Hussein

  • Any report to check vacation rule for users?

    any report to check vacation rule for users?

    Hello Anand,
    there is no report but you may use the production order info system with list "components" and create a layout contaning the issued quantity and/or the final issue indicator. With a correct sorting, the list should show all orders with non-issued components at the top.
    Regards, Andreas

  • Slow Performance with Business Rules

    Hello,
    Has anyone ever had slow performance with business rules? For example, I attached a calc script to a form and it ran for 20 seconds. I made an exact replica of the calc script in a business rules and it took 30 seconds to run. Also, when creating / modifying business rules in EAS it takes a long time to open or save or attach security - any ideas on things to improve this performance?
    Thanks!

    If you are having issues with performance of assigning access then I am sure there was patch available, it was either a HSS patch or planning patch.
    Cheers
    John
    http://john-goodwin.blogspot.com/

  • Vacation Rule not working as expected

       In Oracle business process workspace(PS5) the Vacation Rule is not properly working. Even vacation Rule has been activated to delegate the process instances to another user the process instances are being send to that user.  Has anybody able to define vacation rules successfully.. If so could u please share the steps? Thanks.

    Any help please ?

  • Vacation Rule works for ALL but not for particular notification in Item typ

    Hi,
    I have a situation where Vacation Rule is Ignored when choose the select option in notification page of vacation rule and notifications were being sent to Original Approver (who created the vacation Rule) instead of delegate.
    Vacation rule is working perfectly when choose the notification as ALL but is not working when given a particular message(Timecard Approved,Approve Requisition).
    Below is some example of this inconsistent behavior:
    1. Selected Item type as OTL Workflows for Employees, For this Item Type there are 3 Notifications as
    TIMECARD_APPROVED,ERROR_MESSAGE,TIMECARD_APPROVAL_INLINE in select opition.
    If i select the TIMECARD_APPROVAL_INLINE notifications are going to delegate, and for TIMECARD_APPROVED not going to delegate.
    2. Selected PO Approval, It contains only one Notification(PO_PO_APPROVE). So it is working fine.
    3 Selected PO Requisition Approval,it contains the 4 notifications.
    PO_REQ_APPROVE_SIMPLE_JRAD, PO_REQ_APPROVE,PO_REQ_INVALID_FORWARD,PO_REQ_NO_APPROVER.
    If i select the PO_REQ_APPROVE_SIMPLE_JRAD notifications are going to delegate, and for PO_REQ_APPROVE not going to delegate.
    Any inputs on this.
    Version 11.5.10.2 RUP 6.
    Regards,
    Ajith

    Hi,
    on problem I spot is that all your components created by the forEach loop have the same ID value. I suggest you change the ID to e.g. id="soc_#{item.index}" for zhe select one choices. In addition, I don't see where you refresh components after the change
    Frank

  • How to know whether a vacation rule is set for a user

    Hi,
    How to know whether a vacation rule is set for a user or not in the BPM process. Can anyone help me in this.
    Thanks,

    In Linux a user has to have read permission on a file to even see that it exists. As a result, if a user (or a group to which they belong) doesn't have read access to the file File.exists() will return false. Windows which doesn't have as tightly controlled access to files will admit that a file exists whether it can be read or not.
    PS.
    This is proof that I should never answer a question off the top of my head when I haven't had my red bull yet. This is wrong. You will be able to see it if you have read and execute on the directory.
    thumps self in head
    Message was edited by:
    puckstopper31

  • Vacation rule   - Timesheet approval for a specific project

    Problem Description: Would like to know how to set the vacation rule for a specific project.
    My requirement is to create vacation rule for a timesheet approval for a specific project. I do see option in vacation rules but there is no option to select specific project.
    Can you please help me out on this?
    ======================================================
    Transfer notification ownership
    A manager may transfer a notification for a specific project to the new manager of that project.
    Regards
    Umeshwar Thakur
    91-9766616912

    Hi Dina, thx for your response
    I have error "Rejection Error : Auto Accouting Error"
    There is Output :
    Project Num Revenue(Credited) Customer Agreement Rejection Reason
    DP700150.01 1 NOKIA SI( 1058) PKS-01/NSN/09 AutoAccounting Error

  • Vacation Rules for PO Approval

    Hi,
    We are using Position Hierarchy where an employee1 with limits over 1 million(USD) goes on vacation and he is delegating his authority to another employee2 who has limit of 50,000USD.
    Now, if the PO is raised above 50,000 USD it would go to employee1 but he has Delegated his Response to employee2. Also the employee2 is not a part of that Approval Path. In this case, the PO goes to employee2 for Approval and is returned to the Buyer as No Approver Found.
    This is because the employee2 is not a Part of that Hierarchy.
    But even if we add him into the Hierarchy, the PO ciruclates within employee1 & employee2.
    Is there anyway in Oracle where the employee Who is Delegating his response to another employee and the delegated employee should also be given the same position & Approval limits of the earlier one?
    Thanks
    Dinesh

    You need to setup appropriate hierarchy for the employee2 and run the "Fill Employee Hiererchy" program.
    There is no automated way to update the position and approval limits based on vacation rule setup.

  • Setting up vacation rules from Mass Timecard Approval Responsibilty.

    Our users are using the Mass Timecard Approval for Oracle OTL to approve timecards. This does not however seem to have a link to set up vacation rules. It seems they can only do this from their workflow homepage however we don't want to have to re-assign everyone a different responsibility.
    I tried just adding the workflow function to the Mass Timecard Approval menu however when I tried to access it says not available from this responsibility (or something similar) - I think this is because it is a self service responsibility.
    Anyone any ideas?
    Thanks

    Hi,
    Are you using OTL Approval Formulas?
    If not, you can shift to this style.
    In your OTL Approval Formula, you can check, if person has any vacation rule set, if so you can redirect approval notification based on the rule set.
    Regards,
    Ashish Shah

  • When Role is assigned to User through membership rule then it's membership is not added to OID ?

    Hi All,
          I have OIM 11gR2 installed with  LDAPSync enabled.
    When tried to assign Role to User through membership rule, Role is successfully assigned to User in OIM, but it is not added in OID.
    Role membership is added in OID when User requests Role through Catalog search. Also, Role membership is added in OID after running job 'LDAPSync Post Enable Provision Role Memberships to LDAP '.
    How can I add Role membership in OID  as soon as Role is assigned to User  through membership rule in OIM ?

    Hi
    It sounds like you have not selected anything on the Presentation & Data tab of the Workspace Startpoint/User Service.
    You need to specify:
    Your Asset (the form you want to present to the user)
    An associated Action Profile (tells the server how you want the form rendered...typically it is set to Default which uses the Render PDF Form process)
    The variable to hold your data(typically an xml variable)
    Make sure these are set.
    Diana

  • Undeliverable Vacation Rule Messages

    We setup the Groupwise system at the end of 2011, and I have to say it is really great.
    In a daily review of the log files, I have been noticing that when people turn on their vacation rule messages, they seem to be undeliverable. Finally one user has come to me saying the messages come back with something like this (actual user and domain names changed)
    ================================================== ===
    The attached file had the following undeliverable recipient(s):
    [email protected]
    Information about your message:
    Subject: RE: payment request (Harry--out)
    GroupWise Message Id: 4F845875.AA3:77:28100
    Message log tag: 81251
    Number of send attempts: 1
    Time of initial send attempt: 04-10-12 12:05:04
    Transcript of session follows:
    Command: MAIL FROM:<[email protected]>
    Response: 553 5.1.8 <[email protected]>... Domain of sender address [email protected]
    Received: from inltweb-MTA by linux-gwia.domain.com
    with Novell_GroupWise; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 12:05:04 -0400
    Message-Id: <[email protected]>
    X-Mailer: Novell GroupWise Internet Agent 8.0.2
    Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 11:57:41 -0400
    From: "Harry Walters" <[email protected]>
    To: "Lisa Smith" <[email protected]>
    Subject: RE: payment request (Harry--out)
    Mime-Version: 1.0
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
    Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
    Content-Disposition: inline
    message body follows.....
    ================================================== ==
    What is causing this to occur? I have no idea.
    Thanks in advance,
    Val

    On 10.04.2012 20:46, iliadmin wrote:
    >
    > We setup the Groupwise system at the end of 2011, and I have to say it
    > is really great.
    >
    > In a daily review of the log files, I have been noticing that when
    > people turn on their vacation rule messages, they seem to be
    > undeliverable. Finally one user has come to me saying the messages come
    > back with something like this (actual user and domain names changed)
    > ================================================== ===
    > The attached file had the following undeliverable recipient(s):
    > [email protected]
    >
    >
    > Information about your message:
    > Subject: RE: payment request (Harry--out)
    > GroupWise Message Id: 4F845875.AA3:77:28100
    > Message log tag: 81251
    > Number of send attempts: 1
    > Time of initial send attempt: 04-10-12 12:05:04
    >
    > Transcript of session follows:
    > Command: MAIL FROM:<[email protected]>
    > Response: 553 5.1.8<[email protected]>... Domain
    > of sender address [email protected]
    >
    > Received: from inltweb-MTA by linux-gwia.domain.com
    > with Novell_GroupWise; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 12:05:04 -0400
    > Message-Id:<[email protected]>
    > X-Mailer: Novell GroupWise Internet Agent 8.0.2
    > Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 11:57:41 -0400
    > From: "Harry Walters"<[email protected]>
    > To: "Lisa Smith"<[email protected]>
    > Subject: RE: payment request (Harry--out)
    > Mime-Version: 1.0
    > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
    > Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
    > Content-Disposition: inline
    >
    > message body follows.....
    > ================================================== ==
    > What is causing this to occur? I have no idea.
    Your "DNS Hostname/A Record" setting in GWIA is wrong. It must be an
    *official, real, existing* internet resolveable DNS hostname. Like
    usually something like "mail.yourdomain.com". Again, what you enter
    there *must* exist for real in the internets DNS.
    CU,
    Massimo Rosen
    Novell Knowledge Partner
    No emails please!
    http://www.cfc-it.de

Maybe you are looking for