Approvals Process: Cannot promote a Planning Unit

Hi, Am new to the Approvals process in Planning 11.1.2.2
Have set up a Planning unit and assigned owner and reviewers to entities. Approvals template is set to "Bottom Up". Have also assigned a version and scenario to the Planning Unit H. When the Planning Unit is Started , the current owner changes to the user assigned as the owner and all is good. However when the owner attemptes to promote the planning unit to the next reviewer the promotion action fails with the message "Change status cannot change ownership to the new owner due to insufficient access". For my testing, have assigned the owner and all reviewers "Approvals Administrator" access to the planning application.
Any ideas as to what access the error message is talking about ?
Thanks !

Dear,
-Please check with the Provision that you have given to the USER,
-Use file based export and checke wheater you missed any user to mention that hierarchy.
-IN the approval hierarchy check every node weather you have given the user there or not, chances are that even if you miss one member you will get
this error.
-We faced the same issue and we got resolved it by checking the Provision of the User and following the above steps
Thanks
Bejagam Naveen

Similar Messages

Users having access can't promote planning units during First pass state

Hi,
There is something I do not understand using the workflow in Hyperion Planning 11.1.2 : on first pass state, users having access can not promote a planning unit.
Only the owner can promote... to himself !
I'm lost !
Please help.
Thanks.
Virgile.
Edited by: 808808 on 7 déc. 2010 06:19
Edited by: 808808 on 7 déc. 2010 06:22

Hi,
I tried first with a Planner user, and then with a Interactive user, and there is no difference.
When I try to change the status, I have an error message that tells me that I can't change status of the planning unit.

User In Planning unit Hierarchy unable to see data form in editable mode

hi all,
we are facing a problem in planning unit hierarchy in Hyperion planning, where we have 4 users, Hierarchy is define as
hierarchy: budget approved
version: approved
Entity: Finance
Senario:Budget
haroon asghar ( owner)
adeel javid (Reviewer)
Naeem asghar (Reviewer)
Imtiaz (Reviewer)
Issue is that,after start the budget activity (promotional path) by Admin, the data form editable to Owner haroon asghar
but after completing his work by haroon,when he promote the planning unit ,the next user in Hierarchy "Adeel javid" unable to see data form in respective planning unit in uneditable data form not only for this user but all rest of the users as well,while i think data form should only uneditable(grayed) for user Haroon Asghar who promote the planning unit.
we have checked all security rights to the users those are "Write access" but still Adeel javid is unable to enter data,so the budget activity is stop due to this problem.
when i remove the planning unit then i log in with all user one by one and see all data form required version,scenario and entity were editable to all users mention above
we want to run budget activity with the above planning unit hierarchy.
plz any one provide the proposed solution of the said issue
we are using Product Version 11.1.2.0.00
Regards
Anwar

Reviewers will not be able to write data to the intersection. Reviewers can only review the data and follow-up with a Reject, Promote, Sign off, Delegate, Originate or Freeze.
Please refer Article ID 1226783.1 in MOS.
HTH-
Jasmine.

How does the Approvals process work in Oracle Hyperion Planning v 11.1.2

Hi,
I have recently upgraded to Oracle Hyperion Planning v 11.1.2 and the way that the application handles budget / Forecast approvals appears to have changed.
Is anyone able to direct me to a user manual or provide me with some guidance on how to set up the approvals process in the upgrade Oracle Hyperion Planning v 11.1.2.
Currently I have the approvals hierarchy set to allow all approvals and have the approvals template set to bottom up, I have not put any values on the hierarchy and sub hierarchy tab as I want to drive approvals by entity only. I have set the correct Scenario and assigned the owners/approvers however when I start the approvals process the current owner is let sitting at no owner? Should this not pull though the owner set up under assign owners.
When I log in as the owner of the planning unit I do get the option to promote the unit as set out in the assign owner hierarchy however when I attempt to do this I get the following error:
Failed: Unauthorized New Owner
I am relatively new to planning so any help you can provide me with would be much appreciated.
Edited by: Bestie 279 on Aug 9, 2011 4:16 PM

You might want to have a look at "Hyperion Planning Process Management Features explained By Example [Document 1226783.1]" in MOS.
HTH-
Jasmine.

Planning approvals process in 11.1.2.2 - "approved" to "Not started"

Hi
We are on Planning 11.1.2.2.Last year we have used a planning unit hiearchy with "Custom" for Enable approvals and "Free form" template options. Now the planning unit is in "approved" status as budget process is completed last year.We are planning to kick off our next year budget.
How can i change the workflow status to "Not Started".
Please suggest
Thank you

You will be using the same planning units and same approval process, wont you? all you need to do is to start them again.
Remember: Once an administrator excludes a Planning Unit, all annotations and history associated with the Planning Unit are discarded. The Planning Unit's status is returned to Not Started and the owner is set to No Owner. However, the data values are retained. The data retained will include the Supporting Detail.
Cheers..!!
Rahul S.

Workflow Planning Unit Ownership - Begin the budget review process

As an Admin, is there a way to assign multiple planning units with an import option or something like that? Right now the only option I see is to go in one-by-one and start the fcst cycle and then assign the ownership to the person who is entering the budget information. I have 150 Entity members to assign for one forecast cycle and was wondering if there was a "smarter" way to do this.

Hi!
We are referring to the same example of wf for which you answered some time ago. But we need to extend the process to the whole entity dimension. Thus we have this situation.
our entity dimension: --> http://postimage.org/image/d3utdauzn/
Our wf process:
free format wf. (since the entity hierarchy does not follow a linear path: bottom-up or top-down)
1.ENTITY 1 inserts data and submits them to a reviewer.
2.the reviewer approves or rejects data.
3.then the process should be sent to ENTITY 2,3,4 (lower levels of ENTITY 1) to start to modify/adjust data that ENTITY 1 has imputed and distributed to their levels trough a rule.
the problem is at the 3rd point. How could ENTITY 1 or the REVIEWER pass the process to ENTITY 2,3, and 4 at the same time? I see that I cannot make a group of users owner of one PU, and then limit their level trough the provisioning. The only solution that I have found for this is to send an e mail to ENTITY 2,3,4 and then let them start to input their data (the drawback in this case is that they can always modify data in cells for which they have the write provisioning , and not only when the reviewer has approved data.
moreover in the case the reviewer approves data sent by ENTITY1 he becomes the new owner of the PU, that is the only way trough which ENTITY 1 cannot modified them after the approvation)).
Thank you very much.
Edited by: user648334 on Jun 6, 2012 2:51 AM

Planning Process Mgmt/Workflow function - Reset Planning Units

We are rolling forward our Planning application for a new budget year. I changed the Budget scenario start and end years, but I cannot recall how to reset the Planning units for Process Mgmt/Workflow. BTW: All the units are currently designated "Under Review", but they were actually finalized last summer. Any help would be appreciated.
Thanks in advance!

Hi,
You can reset them by taking the same route you did to start them.
Log in as an admin
Select File, then Process Management, then Manage Process.
select a scenario.
select a version.
select the top entity > and choose cycle exclude.
This will reset all process management for the scenario/version combination
Ok?
Cheers
John
http://john-goodwin.blogspot.com/

Running Rules on "Locked"/Promoted Planning Units

Hi All,
I'm using Hyperion Planning and Smart View Version 11.1.2.2.
Does anyone know if it is possible to prevent users from being able to run rules on data that is supposedly "locked out" by virtue of a Planning Unit? I was under the impression that Planning Units were supposed to control who could change the data rather than simply who could type numbers into forms, maybe I had this wrong? It seems a bit of a transparent piece of functionality if users can still change numbers after they've passed ownership to someone else.
A working Example:
A user can promote their data, but is still able to go back to a form where that data sits and run Rules on-Save, through Right-click menus or through Smart View.
I'm worried about someone accidentally interfering with data whilst another user is analysing it etc.
Am I missing something here?
Regards
Ed

Hi, Ed.
You're right, Planning has so many parts to be developed. PU promotion doesn't prevent users from running BR's
If you're really worry about it you can think up a workaround.
You have to create a new form having design simular to a PU hierarchy. User have to enter data (suppose 1) in intersection of Scenario, Version, Entity and Account (if used in PUH) All others dims member should be Begbalance, Product n/a etc.
All BR's you need to prevent from executing while PU is approved, freezed or just owned by the reviewer or in other cases you think about should include extra code before original calculation takes place. You simply check the value of 1 in all calculated PUs in current BR and throw an error if meet it (@RETURN with some justified text message)
So when one user (lets say first owner) has finished entering data he goes to the form discussed above and enters 1 for related PU. You can build a task list having such steps After that no one can execute BR successfuly
Try this maybe it helps you
Vladimir

Planning Units issues in Hyperion Planning 11.1.2

Hi, experts.
I'm new in HP, so needed some help with misunderstanding of how PU&proccess management normally works.
More detailed I interested at the area of Validation rules.
I have to give an example of few problems I met during my try to implement this functionality.
Firstly, it's a newest version of EPM 11.1.2 installed and supported by the vendor's professionals
I have Planning app deployed in EPMA with 14 dims. I didn't drop any standard planning dimensions, all are present
There is the only PU hierarchy to test how approvals works. It has 3 entities and 12 elements of additional dimension - functional group. Hence, there are 36 level zero members in PU hierarchy.
Form1 consists of 36 rows according to PUH, columns are Period (17) and one custom dim for the target, plan values, it's diff etc. Validation rule VR1 on Form1 check negative values of target minus plan (I plan expences) VR1 has "No Promote" flag. Then I start 2 level0 planning units (entity1-FuncGroup1 and entity1-FuncGroup2). I try to promote these PU1&PU2. It's Ok only if negative exists I get an data error links drilling down into my form1. So user can see the error and all happy.
Problem actually with form2 that has Region Dim in page. Entity,Functional Group,Account in rows and Plan value,Year,Period in columns. It also has VR2 for testing plan values greater than 1000 with No Promote option. Another VR3 checks values greater than 100 to add new approver, reviewer (no matter) to the approvals process management.
Both VR2 and VR3 don't work accurately. They fired only for the first member in page (Region), hence any data validation for other regions except first skipped. In addition VR3 when triggered for Region1 always circles (between new and previous approver). It meens there is no way to finish this proccess using the promote option. Anyway you can approve PU, but all steps after current Aprover will be skipped in promotional path.
Maybe I can't work with Proccess managment in the right way? So could anybody give me an idea what's wrong. I've spent much time googling any issues like me have
Many thanks in advance,
Vladimir

Hi, Theresia
Yes you're absolutely right, I created VR from the manage form's menu. So I use standard HP 11.1.2 functionality. I've seen it in new features while read Oracle documentation. Also with testing of approvals in Proccess managment I use distinct colours for negatives and diff values (greater 1000 and 100 in my example). Colours work fine, but i can't say it about aprovals :). And all these examples of using planning form VR's i've taken from oracle administrators&user guiide and from presentations of EPM 11.1.2
In addition I've started work with Hyperion products 2-3 month ago. Hence I have to read a lot of information because my previous experience was OLTP, RDBMS not OLAP.
As a first step i wanna know all standard possibilities of product i use. And also best practice and some often used technics. Many thanks for your idea with Smart list and BR i'll try it (though i use EMPA and Calc Manager rules). I know that soon I have to use Java API's, so I might read and learn Java to write the simplest code first. But for me it's too much info i have to load into my brain in such short period :)
As a resume, my opinion it's a bug of new features EPM 11.1.2. But maybe I'm wrong cause none has said the same
Anyway thanks, Theresia, for your help. If you know or will some new additional info i'll say you thanks again
Best regards,
Vladimir

Hyperion Planning reject a Planning Unit question

From HP user guide, it said that when rejecting a planning unit, by default, Reject returns the planning unit's ownership to the previous owner, but you may select the next owner. But when I try to reject, there is always a list of allowed users in the list box and I have to select one. How can I reject to previous owners instead of selecting a specific user? Thanks a lot.

Hi,
I am not sure if you will be able to do exactly what you want to do but you can customize process status actions.
Have a read of :- http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/E12825_01/epm.111/hp_admin/ch11s06s03.html
Also here is some extra information about the table :_ HSP_PM_ACTIONS
The table has the following structure
from_state_id column e.g 0 Not Started, 1 First Pass (these are defined in HSP_PM_STATES)
changable_by column defines who can it (0=Owner, 1=anyone with access, 2=admin, 3=no one)
action_id column - defined in HSP_PM_ACTIONS (1 = Reject, 2= Approve, 3=Sign Off, 4 =Start, 5 =exclude, 6 = Promote)
new_owner column (0=Owner, 1=anyone with access, 2=admin, 3=no one)
Cheers
John
http://john-goodwin.blogspot.com/

Report Painter - Use SKF to calc act/plan unit costs in CCtr report

Hi Report Painter Gurus,
I am an end user working with our Report Painter consultant and I have asked for a Cost Centre report with columns for Actual Costs, Actual Unit costs, Plan costs, Plan Unit costs for Month and Cumulative. I have seen this report in my previous business so I know it can be done but consultant says it's impossible.
The report I previously used had the SKF values at the bottom of the cost centre report and then the unit costs columns (both actual and plan) referenced these SKF cells in the formula which divided Cost by SKF.
We have created the SKF using KK01 and posted dummy amounts in KB31N but consultant says he cannot reference the SKF values in the formlas.
If you can spell it out to me (I have dabbled in Report Painter myself), then I am sure I can explain it to consultant.
Any help gratefully appreciated!
Cheers,
Matthew.

Matthew,
I think it is quiet simple. When you add a column to the report painter report you can choose from the drop down menu for 'Basic Key figure' whether it is Costs, Activity quantity, Statistical quantities, etc.
So if you have a column with Costs (X1) and one more column with quantities (X2), you can easily come up with another 'formula' column and use the equation (X1/X2).
I think this should serve your purpose.
Best regards,
Vishal Thakur.
Edited by: Vishal Thakur on Mar 2, 2010 11:08 AM

Three owners of one planning unit in EPM 11.1.2.1

Hello!
I building the budget block hierarchy and I've the situation:
I have three owners of one planning unit (three planners with the same access to data forms, bus. rules and so on, 3 planners in one entity), but more than one owner can't be.
How can I solve this situation without changing the hierarchy of Entity dimension?
Big thx.
Edited by: Zhura on Apr 28, 2012 12:12 PM

Hi. If I've understood your question well you want to assign 3 users as owners of 1 planning unit at the same time. So any of them can submit data and promote it to the next user (reviewers)
It works in 11.1.2.2 and 3 users have to be included into group. The group is assinged as an onwer of such planning unit.

Planning units LCM migration error

our LCM migration 11.1.3 from one app to another (same SS environment) have failed on the planning units - any ideas on why and how to resolve this would be appreciated thx

hi Nick
here is a sample from the LCM log ...
2011-01-22 10:26:55,183 DEBUG - BEGIN : PackageHandler.initialize for package file - E:/Hyperion/common/import_export/msr/PKG_219.xml
2011-01-22 10:26:55,183 INFO - Executing package file - E:/Hyperion/common/import_export/msr/PKG_219.xml
2011-01-22 10:26:56,012 DEBUG - Encrypting password before saving in the Package File
2011-01-22 10:26:56,012 DEBUG - Package file details -
2011-01-22 10:26:56,012 DEBUG - User name - CSSTOKEN
2011-01-22 10:26:56,012 DEBUG - Connection details -
2011-01-22 10:26:56,012 DEBUG - Connection#0-
2011-01-22 10:26:56,012 DEBUG - Connection type-HSS
2011-01-22 10:26:56,012 INFO - Reading HSS URL from command line
2011-01-22 10:26:56,012 INFO - HSS URL could not be read from command line. Reading from registry.
2011-01-22 10:26:56,012 DEBUG - Getting HSS URL from Registry
2011-01-22 10:26:57,387 DEBUG - 20:3502:Missing file HSSLogger.properties.
2011-01-22 10:26:58,527 INFO - Audit Client has been created for the server http://server:28080/interop/Audit
2011-01-22 10:26:58,621 DEBUG - Validated LCM manager ...
2011-01-22 10:26:58,652 DEBUG - BEGIN : MSRHandler.getHelper()
2011-01-22 10:26:58,683 DEBUG - END : MSRHandler.getHelper()
2011-01-22 10:26:58,683 DEBUG - PROCESSING REQUEST beginMigrationReport
2011-01-22 10:26:59,558 DEBUG - Connection#1-
2011-01-22 10:26:59,558 DEBUG - Connection type-Application
2011-01-22 10:26:59,558 DEBUG - Connection#2-
2011-01-22 10:26:59,558 DEBUG - Connection type-FileSystem
2011-01-22 10:26:59,558 DEBUG - Connection type-Application
2011-01-22 10:27:00,324 INFO - Client Enable Status false
2011-01-22 10:27:02,355 INFO - Client Enable Status false
2011-01-22 10:27:23,355 DEBUG - Getting LCM callback info from Registry for product: HP
2011-01-22 10:27:24,011 DEBUG - LCM callback : http://server:8300/HyperionPlanning/servlet/HspLCMServlet
2011-01-22 10:27:24,871 DEBUG - Application name -newapp
2011-01-22 10:27:24,871 DEBUG - Product name -HP
2011-01-22 10:27:24,871 DEBUG - Project name -Planning
2011-01-22 10:27:24,871 DEBUG - Connection name -AppConnection1
2011-01-22 10:27:24,871 DEBUG - Connection type-FileSystem
2011-01-22 10:27:24,886 DEBUG - Connection name -FileSystem-Connection2
2011-01-22 10:27:24,886 DEBUG - File path -/PlnUnits
2011-01-22 10:27:24,886 DEBUG - Task details -
2011-01-22 10:27:24,917 DEBUG - Processing source options -
2011-01-22 10:27:24,917 DEBUG - Processing source filters -
2011-01-22 10:27:24,917 DEBUG - BEGIN : MSRHandler.getHelper()
2011-01-22 10:27:24,917 DEBUG - END : MSRHandler.getHelper()
2011-01-22 10:27:24,917 DEBUG - PROCESSING REQUEST initializeMigrationTask
2011-01-22 10:27:24,933 DEBUG - path - /Relational Data,type=,pattern - *,recursive - true,modifiedBy - null,startDate - null,endDate - null
2011-01-22 10:27:24,933 DEBUG - Processing target options -
2011-01-22 10:27:24,933 DEBUG - Completed processing Task#1-
2011-01-22 10:27:24,933 DEBUG - END : PackageHandler.initialize()
2011-01-22 10:27:25,324 INFO - Client Enable Status false
2011-01-22 10:27:25,324 INFO - Audit Client has been created for the server http://server:28080/interop/Audit
2011-01-22 10:27:25,324 DEBUG - BEGIN : TaskHandler.run for thread with identity
2011-01-22 10:27:25,324 DEBUG - COMPLETED VALIDATING ALL TASKS !
2011-01-22 10:27:25,324 DEBUG - Running tasks for batch (sequence id) #1
2011-01-22 10:27:25,324 DEBUG - MIGRATING ARTIFACTS FROM "/PlnUnits" TO "Planning/newapp"
2011-01-22 10:27:25,339 DEBUG - Processing task 1...
2011-01-22 10:27:26,042 DEBUG - BEGIN : TaskHandler.getExecutor
2011-01-22 10:27:26,042 DEBUG - END : TaskHandler.getExecutor
2011-01-22 10:27:26,058 DEBUG - AWAITING FOR 1 PERMITS
2011-01-22 10:27:26,058 DEBUG - AWAITING FOR 1 PERMITS
2011-01-22 10:27:26,058 DEBUG - Migrating 1 artifacts in group for thread -1
2011-01-22 10:27:26,167 DEBUG - ZIPPING ARTIFACT E:\Hyperion\common\import_export\lcmadmin@Native Directory\PlnUnits\resource\Relational Data\Planning Units.xml
2011-01-22 10:27:54,667 DEBUG - BEGIN : MSRHandler.getHelper()
2011-01-22 10:27:54,667 DEBUG - END : MSRHandler.getHelper()
2011-01-22 10:28:54,666 DEBUG - BEGIN : MSRHandler.getHelper()
2011-01-22 10:28:54,666 DEBUG - END : MSRHandler.getHelper()
2011-01-22 10:28:54,666 DEBUG - BEGIN : MSRHandler.getHelper()
2011-01-22 10:28:54,666 DEBUG - END : MSRHandler.getHelper()
2011-01-22 10:28:54,666 DEBUG - PROCESSING REQUEST KeepAlive
2011-01-22 10:23:43,494 ERROR - error /Relational Data/Planning Units - Import failed. Total - 3000, Success - 1032
2011-01-22 10:23:43,494 DEBUG - LAST IMPORTED GROUP EVENT
2011-01-22 10:23:43,494 DEBUG - LAST EXPORTED GROUP EVENT
2011-01-22 10:23:43,494 DEBUG - BEGIN : MSRHandler.getHelper()
2011-01-22 10:23:43,494 DEBUG - END : MSRHandler.getHelper()
2011-01-22 10:23:43,494 DEBUG - PROCESSING REQUEST updateMigrationInfo
2011-01-22 10:23:43,494 DEBUG - COMPLETED PROCESSING SEQUENCED TASKS !
2011-01-22 10:23:43,494 DEBUG - AWAITING FOR 0 PERMITS
2011-01-22 10:23:43,494 DEBUG - BEGIN : MSRHandler.getHelper()
2011-01-22 10:23:43,494 DEBUG - END : MSRHandler.getHelper()
2011-01-22 10:23:43,494 DEBUG - BEGIN : MSRHandler.getHelper()
2011-01-22 10:23:43,494 DEBUG - END : MSRHandler.getHelper()
2011-01-22 10:23:43,838 DEBUG - BEGIN : MSRHandler.getHelper()
2011-01-22 10:23:43,838 DEBUG - END : MSRHandler.getHelper()
2011-01-22 10:23:43,838 DEBUG - PROCESSING REQUEST postFinalStatus
2011-01-22 10:23:44,056 DEBUG - Writing Migration Status to Shared Services ...
2011-01-22 10:23:44,056 DEBUG - BEGIN : MSRHandler.getHelper()
2011-01-22 10:23:44,056 DEBUG - END : MSRHandler.getHelper()
2011-01-22 10:23:44,056 DEBUG - PROCESSING REQUEST endMigrationTask
2011-01-22 10:23:44,291 DEBUG - BEGIN : MSRHandler.getHelper()
2011-01-22 10:23:44,291 DEBUG - END : MSRHandler.getHelper()
2011-01-22 10:23:44,291 DEBUG - PROCESSING REQUEST endMigrationReport
2011-01-22 10:23:44,603 DEBUG - MSR STATUS MESSAGES FLUSH SUCCESSFUL
2011-01-22 10:23:44,603 DEBUG - COMPLETED PROCESSING. CLU EXITED !
2011-01-22 10:23:44,603 DEBUG - PROCESSING COMPLETED !
Please advise ! thx

LCM migration error - Planning units

our LCM migration 11.1.1.3 from one app to another (same SS environment) have failed on the planning units - any ideas on why and how to resolve this would be appreciated thx

Hi Bob,
the account has admin rights to the source and target Planning apps ...
Have you tried to export the Planning Units to a file to see if it can do that successfully? yes and it has failed - only 50% out of 3000 units were exported
here is a sample from the LCM log ...
2011-01-22 10:26:55,183 DEBUG - BEGIN : PackageHandler.initialize for package file - E:/Hyperion/common/import_export/msr/PKG_219.xml
2011-01-22 10:26:55,183 INFO - Executing package file - E:/Hyperion/common/import_export/msr/PKG_219.xml
2011-01-22 10:26:56,012 DEBUG - Encrypting password before saving in the Package File
2011-01-22 10:26:56,012 DEBUG - Package file details -
2011-01-22 10:26:56,012 DEBUG -      User name - CSSTOKEN
2011-01-22 10:26:56,012 DEBUG -      Connection details -
2011-01-22 10:26:56,012 DEBUG -           Connection#0-
2011-01-22 10:26:56,012 DEBUG -                Connection type-HSS
2011-01-22 10:26:56,012 INFO - Reading HSS URL from command line
2011-01-22 10:26:56,012 INFO - HSS URL could not be read from command line. Reading from registry.
2011-01-22 10:26:56,012 DEBUG - Getting HSS URL from Registry
2011-01-22 10:26:57,387 DEBUG - 20:3502:Missing file HSSLogger.properties.
2011-01-22 10:26:58,527 INFO - Audit Client has been created for the server http://server:28080/interop/Audit
2011-01-22 10:26:58,621 DEBUG -                Validated LCM manager ...
2011-01-22 10:26:58,652 DEBUG - BEGIN : MSRHandler.getHelper()
2011-01-22 10:26:58,683 DEBUG - END : MSRHandler.getHelper()
2011-01-22 10:26:58,683 DEBUG - PROCESSING REQUEST beginMigrationReport
2011-01-22 10:26:59,558 DEBUG -           Connection#1-
2011-01-22 10:26:59,558 DEBUG -                Connection type-Application
2011-01-22 10:26:59,558 DEBUG -           Connection#2-
2011-01-22 10:26:59,558 DEBUG -                Connection type-FileSystem
2011-01-22 10:26:59,558 DEBUG -                Connection type-Application
2011-01-22 10:27:00,324 INFO - Client Enable Status false
2011-01-22 10:27:02,355 INFO - Client Enable Status false
2011-01-22 10:27:23,355 DEBUG - Getting LCM callback info from Registry for product: HP
2011-01-22 10:27:24,011 DEBUG - LCM callback : http://server:8300/HyperionPlanning/servlet/HspLCMServlet
2011-01-22 10:27:24,871 DEBUG -                Application name -newapp
2011-01-22 10:27:24,871 DEBUG -                Product name -HP
2011-01-22 10:27:24,871 DEBUG -                Project name -Planning
2011-01-22 10:27:24,871 DEBUG -                Connection name -AppConnection1
2011-01-22 10:27:24,871 DEBUG -                Connection type-FileSystem
2011-01-22 10:27:24,886 DEBUG -                Connection name -FileSystem-Connection2
2011-01-22 10:27:24,886 DEBUG -                File path -/PlnUnits
2011-01-22 10:27:24,886 DEBUG -      Task details -
2011-01-22 10:27:24,917 DEBUG -           Processing source options -
2011-01-22 10:27:24,917 DEBUG -           Processing source filters -
2011-01-22 10:27:24,917 DEBUG - BEGIN : MSRHandler.getHelper()
2011-01-22 10:27:24,917 DEBUG - END : MSRHandler.getHelper()
2011-01-22 10:27:24,917 DEBUG - PROCESSING REQUEST initializeMigrationTask
2011-01-22 10:27:24,933 DEBUG -                path - /Relational Data,type=,pattern - *,recursive - true,modifiedBy - null,startDate - null,endDate - null
2011-01-22 10:27:24,933 DEBUG -           Processing target options -
2011-01-22 10:27:24,933 DEBUG -           Completed processing Task#1-
2011-01-22 10:27:24,933 DEBUG - END : PackageHandler.initialize()
2011-01-22 10:27:25,324 INFO - Client Enable Status false
2011-01-22 10:27:25,324 INFO - Audit Client has been created for the server http://server:28080/interop/Audit
2011-01-22 10:27:25,324 DEBUG - BEGIN : TaskHandler.run for thread with identity
2011-01-22 10:27:25,324 DEBUG - COMPLETED VALIDATING ALL TASKS !
2011-01-22 10:27:25,324 DEBUG - Running tasks for batch (sequence id) #1
2011-01-22 10:27:25,324 DEBUG - MIGRATING ARTIFACTS FROM "/PlnUnits" TO "Planning/newapp"
2011-01-22 10:27:25,339 DEBUG - Processing task 1...
2011-01-22 10:27:26,042 DEBUG - BEGIN : TaskHandler.getExecutor
2011-01-22 10:27:26,042 DEBUG - END : TaskHandler.getExecutor
2011-01-22 10:27:26,058 DEBUG - AWAITING FOR 1 PERMITS
2011-01-22 10:27:26,058 DEBUG - AWAITING FOR 1 PERMITS
2011-01-22 10:27:26,058 DEBUG - Migrating 1 artifacts in group for thread -1
2011-01-22 10:27:26,167 DEBUG - ZIPPING ARTIFACT E:\Hyperion\common\import_export\lcmadmin@Native Directory\PlnUnits\resource\Relational Data\Planning Units.xml
2011-01-22 10:27:54,667 DEBUG - BEGIN : MSRHandler.getHelper()
2011-01-22 10:27:54,667 DEBUG - END : MSRHandler.getHelper()
2011-01-22 10:28:54,666 DEBUG - BEGIN : MSRHandler.getHelper()
2011-01-22 10:28:54,666 DEBUG - END : MSRHandler.getHelper()
2011-01-22 10:28:54,666 DEBUG - BEGIN : MSRHandler.getHelper()
2011-01-22 10:28:54,666 DEBUG - END : MSRHandler.getHelper()
2011-01-22 10:28:54,666 DEBUG - PROCESSING REQUEST KeepAlive
2011-01-22 10:23:43,494 ERROR - error /Relational Data/Planning Units - Import failed. Total - 3000, Success - 1032
2011-01-22 10:23:43,494 DEBUG - LAST IMPORTED GROUP EVENT
2011-01-22 10:23:43,494 DEBUG - LAST EXPORTED GROUP EVENT
2011-01-22 10:23:43,494 DEBUG - BEGIN : MSRHandler.getHelper()
2011-01-22 10:23:43,494 DEBUG - END : MSRHandler.getHelper()
2011-01-22 10:23:43,494 DEBUG - PROCESSING REQUEST updateMigrationInfo
2011-01-22 10:23:43,494 DEBUG - COMPLETED PROCESSING SEQUENCED TASKS !
2011-01-22 10:23:43,494 DEBUG - AWAITING FOR 0 PERMITS
2011-01-22 10:23:43,494 DEBUG - BEGIN : MSRHandler.getHelper()
2011-01-22 10:23:43,494 DEBUG - END : MSRHandler.getHelper()
2011-01-22 10:23:43,494 DEBUG - BEGIN : MSRHandler.getHelper()
2011-01-22 10:23:43,494 DEBUG - END : MSRHandler.getHelper()
2011-01-22 10:23:43,838 DEBUG - BEGIN : MSRHandler.getHelper()
2011-01-22 10:23:43,838 DEBUG - END : MSRHandler.getHelper()
2011-01-22 10:23:43,838 DEBUG - PROCESSING REQUEST postFinalStatus
2011-01-22 10:23:44,056 DEBUG - Writing Migration Status to Shared Services ...
2011-01-22 10:23:44,056 DEBUG - BEGIN : MSRHandler.getHelper()
2011-01-22 10:23:44,056 DEBUG - END : MSRHandler.getHelper()
2011-01-22 10:23:44,056 DEBUG - PROCESSING REQUEST endMigrationTask
2011-01-22 10:23:44,291 DEBUG - BEGIN : MSRHandler.getHelper()
2011-01-22 10:23:44,291 DEBUG - END : MSRHandler.getHelper()
2011-01-22 10:23:44,291 DEBUG - PROCESSING REQUEST endMigrationReport
2011-01-22 10:23:44,603 DEBUG - MSR STATUS MESSAGES FLUSH SUCCESSFUL
2011-01-22 10:23:44,603 DEBUG - COMPLETED PROCESSING. CLU EXITED !
2011-01-22 10:23:44,603 DEBUG - PROCESSING COMPLETED !
Please advise ! thx

Calcmgr rules circumvent planning unit ownership read/write restriction?

Hi All.
Planning 11.1.2.2
I have obsaerved that a rule set up to allow writing a value on a database intersection, circumvents the planning unit ownership allowing users to write to an intersection in a unit that is not in their ownership and where they are not able to write from the UI.
Is this expected/has it always been this way?
I have a requirement that the user should not see the full account tree when loading a form, as not all accounts are relevant for all entities. Therefore missing rows are suppressed. In order for a missing row to become visible on the form I implemented a rule which allows to enter the value for the account, which then becomes visible on the form. However this same rule when run by a user on a planning unit they are not owning can still change values that the user cannot change in the UI as he is not a planning unit owner.
I assume this is due to the fact that the planning unit ownership restrictions don't apply in essbase and the rule goes directly there, but I want to know if it is expected that business rules fail to honor ownership restrictions on planning units.
Agnete
Edited by: Agnete on Aug 23, 2012 3:23 PM

These are correct, the calc will run whatever you tell it to run. If you use a business rule, it will still run the calc on what you tell it to run on, but you can prompt for a member (or take it from the form), and right your fix statement so that the calc only runs on the prompt. The prompt is related to security and a user can't select a member they don't have access to. That might help with your issue.
Kyle Goodfriend
www.In2Hyperion.com

Approvals Process: Cannot promote a Planning Unit

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for