Approvers Comment after 1st Level release

During PO release - Can second/ Third level approver pur comment in the "Approvers Comments" field.
Normally this field is disabled after first level release and 2/3 level approver cannot put any comments if necessary.
Is there a solution for this.
Ninad Patil

HI,
SPRO>Material Management>Purcahsing->Purchase order->Release procedure for purchase order--->Define release Procedure for the PO
In this Release Stategy config there is option called Release indicator
where in we have to define a release ID and this release ID has to be given 4 or 5 changeable for the value or price updation and then we have to go to release Strategy option we can select the release strategy we want the change and in the Strategy
click on the release status and in this status we can give the ID defined earlier ( at which level what effect should come)
hope so it helps
regards
Anjanna.

Similar Messages

  • PR Item Level Release WF not working after Release Strategy change

    Hi Experts,
               I did PR item Level Release Standard Work flow and it was working fine now due to client requirement we changed the release strategy and now when the PR workflow triggers it gives the Below mentioned error.
    I really don't understand y after changing the release strategy workflow is not working and giving the following error.
    Even if i restart the workflow in SWPR the same error is occuring.
    Exception occurred    - Error when starting work item 000000390118
    PROCESS_NODE     - Error when processing node '0000000003' (ParForEach index 000000)
    CREATE                   -  Error when creating a component of type 'Step'
    CREATE_VIA_WFM  -  Agent determination for step '0000000003' failed
    EVALUATE_AGENT_VIA_RULE - Error in resolution of rule 'AC00000148' for step '0000000003'
    AC00000148             -  Object type 'TS' not valid
    Executing flow work item   - Work item 000000390118: Object FLOWITEM method EXECUTE cannot        be executed
    Executing flow work item   - Error when processing node '0000000003' (ParForEach index 000000)
    Regards,
    Hari

    Hello Hari,
    please set a breakpoint at function module
    ME_REL_GET_RESPONSIBLE
    and see what happends in section
        CASE t16fc-frgwf.
    * keine Ermittlung
          WHEN space.
            RAISE nobody_found.
    * Ermittlung über T16fW
          WHEN '1'.
    If using the T16FW-table, it should go to '1', otherwise it may that a user exit under '9' is used. So please check this.
    Best wishes,
    Florin

  • Not to cancel whole release with 1st level without cancel with higher level

    Hi
    In case of release of PR or PO I have maintained Release Prerequisite. So I can't release with 2nd level of release code without releasing with 1st level of release code. In case of cancelling release reverse should happen. i.e. I can't cancel release with 1st level of release code without cancelling with 2nd level of release code. But I am able to cancel the whole release with 1st level of release code irrespective of whether I have cancelled release with higher level of release codes or not.
    I want this not to happen.
    Any suggestion ? Is there any customizing seting to be maintained.
    Points assured.
    Regds
    Amitava

    Hi,
    My question is still unanswered. Can anybody give any idea? this is urgent.

  • PR item level Release WorkFlow

    Hi Experts,
                      I have activated PR item level release WorkFlow  WS00000038. My MM consultant has configured release strategy with ME51N. The Work flow works fine On releasing it sends notification work item to initator but on release Refusal it don't send notification work item to initator. Can anyone guide me how to resolve this issue.
    TS00007986 SINGLERELEASE
    4 Outcomes of release
    1) Positive Confirmation
    2) Negative Confirmation
    3) Confirmation Release Cancelled
    4) Purchase requisition item significantly changed
    Now 1) posative confirmation is working fine.
    but when we reject release then in that case also the workflow log it is going in undefined output that is significantly changed.
    can anyone help me to resolve this issue.
    Regards,
    Hari

    Hi Hari,
    When you reject a PR, 2 events are getting triggered (Significantly changed and rejection_started). You check this in Transaction SWEL by rejecting PR.
    The reason why output is going to Significantly changed branch is in SWEL you can see that 1st Significantly changed  event is getting triggered and then Rejection_started.
    Solution1: Deactivate the Significantly changed event in termination events tab.
    Solution2: Create an attribute(Database object) for your business object. This attribute should be of type EBAN-BANPR. Check if BANPR = 08 and then send the rejection mail.
    I hope this clears your doubt.
    Please Revert back to me if you have any queries.
    Regards,
    Gautham Paspala

  • CST - escalated support role replacing 1st level only when needed?

    Hi,
    I'm setting up a CST system with one 1st level CSR and 2 in the escalated role.
    Per the CST doc in the KB here: http://kb.worldsecuresystems.com/kb/customer-service-ticketing.html, you can't have the same person in both levels. But I want to set it up so that the person in level two can uncheck herself from that level and check herself as available in level 1 when the designated CSR is away.
    Will this cause problems?

    I had to laugh when reading your post. I wasn’t laughing at you, and clearly not laughing with you. However, I do empathize and after my first experience of cashing in on my “Pro” Care investment, question whether the move to Mac was a wise one.
    I have decided to continue with Apple products in hope that they are simply going through growing pains; and will recognize they are failing in certain customer service areas and will endeavor to improve. However, my patience is growing thin.
    Thanks for the post, it was well done.

  • Expeditors in PO u2013 need to understand if we can stop after 1st 3 expeditors

    Dear Experts,
    For a PO, I have 1st, 2nd, 3rd   Expeditors as 1, 3 and 5 days respectively.
    Delivery date as per PO is 23.03.2011.  So, as expected, 1st, 2nd, 3rd expeditors were sent on 24/25/27th March Respectively.  So far its ok.
    Since, the GR is done on 17.04.2011, a total of  7 expediters have been sent (1 each for 1st, 2nd and 3rd and then afterwards, 1 expeditor per every 5 days).
    My question is, is this the standard behavior of SAP to send expeditor after every 5 days once the first 3 expeditors have been sent until GR is done?
    Where exactly is this configured in SAP? 
    Suppose if I want to send no reminders after 1st 3 reminders, can we achieve this?
    Please suggest me your valuable inputs
    Regards,
    Shetty

    Hi,
    At PO Item Level >>Delivery Tab >> Expeditors Days are mentioned for sending 1st three Expediators ,Below this field "No. Exped " Consist of the Number of Expeditors to be send for the particular line Item.
    Check these field for the value. The field Value should be blank , if only 3 Expeditors are to be sent.
    "Number of Reminders/Expediters :
    Number of reminders or urging messages issued to a vendor with respect to a certain item.
    In the SAP System, a distinction is sometimes made between reminders (issued prior to the due date) and urging messages (issued after the due date and also referred to as "expediters" or "follow-up" letters).
    Use :
    This field shows the total number of reminders and urging messages (expediters) for all schedule lines relating to this item.
    Regards
    Mascot.
    Edited by: Manish Kumar on May 2, 2011 1:07 PM

  • Auto comments after end of div tags

    Hi I like to include a comment to mark the end of each div tag, like so:
    <div id="mainContent">
    </div> <!-- end mainContent -->
    Is it possible to set Dreamweaver to automatically add that comment after each div ending? Thanks

    DW has no such capability, although many of us have been asking for it each new release!
    Please use the wish form to let Adobe know your suggestions!
    http://www.adobe.com/cfusion/mmform/index.cfm?name=wishform

  • Can you create apps after 1st May 2015 using Adobe DPS single edition?

    Can you create apps after 1st May 2015 using Adobe DPS single edition?
    I currently have SE via creatieve cloud - one of the only reasons we switched to CC was for the DPS SE.
    Does anyone know if this capability will just be 'switched off' at midnight 1st May 2015?? There are huge costs for going the enterprise route but with no date in sight for Publish to be launched I am not sure I can wait for this, or should I???

    Adobe states: Please note that the Digital Publishing Suite, Single Edition, service will be available for use until May 1, 2015, but beyond that date the service will no longer be available.
    So essentially my licence will expire on 1st May - Adobe's note just mentions 'service' -  even though part of CC and I will not be able to maintain my app or create any more IPA's after 1st May. I can't beleive there is nothing to switch over to other than paying thousands of pounds for enterprise??
    Just all so vauge, feels like a plug is going to be pulled and thats it??? Maybe I am missing something?

  • Buffer busy wait, 1st level bmp

    Hi All !
    OS: Linux redhat 5
    DB: 11gr2
    Block size: 8K
    In an application we use I can see high buffer busy waits over a various periods.
    I collect some info during this event.
    SQL_HASH_VALUE FILE# BLOCK# REASON
    769132182 6 17512 8
    3983195767 6 17512 8
    769132182 6 17512 8
    3240261994 6 17512 8
    3240261994 6 17512 8
    3240261994 6 17512 8
    769132182 6 17512 8
    ... I have total 35 sessions
    File6 / block 17512 =
    TABLESPACE_NAME SEGMENT_TYPE OWNER SEGMENT_NAME
    GBSLOB LOBSEGMENT GBSASP SYS_LOB0000017961C00006$$
    The sql are both inserts and updates to the same large table, blobs are involved (insert/update)
    blobs using securefile
    AWR reports this for a short period
    Buffer busy waits is the top wait event
    Buffer Wait Statistics DB/Inst: GGBISP01/ggbisp01 Snaps: 20925-20926
    -> ordered by wait time desc, waits desc
    Class Waits Total Wait Time (s) Avg Time (ms)
    1st level bmb 574,636 17,118 30
    free list 20,538 70 3
    undo header 41,150 7 0
    data block 263 1 3
    undo block 18 0 0
    I'm trying to find more details about this wait event, I believe it is related to usage of ASSM.
    Can anyone explain more when 1st level bmp is seen ?
    Thank you !
    Best regards
    Magnus Johansson

    MaJo wrote:
    SQL_HASH_VALUE      FILE#     BLOCK#     REASON
    769132182          6      17512          8
    3983195767          6      17512          8
    769132182          6      17512          8
    3240261994          6      17512          8
    3240261994          6      17512          8
    3240261994          6      17512          8
    769132182          6      17512          8
    ... I have total 35 sessions
    File6 / block 17512 =
    TABLESPACE_NAME                SEGMENT_TYPE       OWNER                          SEGMENT_NAME
    GBSLOB                         LOBSEGMENT         GBSASP                         SYS_LOB0000017961C00006$$The sql are both inserts and updates to the same large table, blobs are involved (insert/update)
    blobs using securefile
    AWR reports this for a short period
    Buffer busy waits is the top wait event
    Buffer Wait Statistics          DB/Inst: GGBISP01/ggbisp01  Snaps: 20925-20926
    -> ordered by wait time desc, waits desc
    Class                    Waits Total Wait Time (s)  Avg Time (ms)
    1st level bmb          574,636              17,118             30
    free list               20,538                  70              3
    undo header             41,150                   7              0
    data block                 263                   1              3
    undo block                  18                   0              0
    -------------------------------------------------------------I'm trying to find more details about this wait event, I believe it is related to usage of ASSM.
    Can anyone explain more when 1st level bmp is seen ?
    Your AWR shows an interesting mix of ASSM and freelist group blocks - are you running ASSM ?
    1st level bitmap blocks (bmb) are the blocks in a segment (usually the first one or two of each extent) that show the availability of free space in the other data blocks. Each bitmap block can identify up to 256 other blocks (the last time I checked), although you have to have a fairly large data segment before you reach this level of mapping.
    If you have a high rate of concurrent inserts and updates on a LOB column then you may be running into code that frequently updates bitmap blocks to show that data blocks have changed from empty to full. It's also possible that you've run into one of the many bugs that appeared when you mixed ASSM with LOB segments - you haven't given the exact version of 11.2, but you might want to check the latest versions and any bug reports for patches to your version.
    Regards
    Jonathan Lewis

  • Document Parking Workflow Responsible Agent for Two level release

    Respected Members,
    I have done all the configuration for document parking workflow.
    i had said if the amount is greater than one lakh it should go two-level amount release.
    My organisation hierarchy includes two positions,
    SUB_HEAD with user xyz
    HEAD with user ABC.
    i have assigned the position HEAD with two level release workflow in spro.
    When i am creating a parking document above one lakh, the work items are generating and it is coming
    in the inbox for the both users ie xyz and abc.
    MY requirement is that when xyz user execute the work item then only it should go to abc user inbox.
    it should not go to abc inbox as soon as document is created.
    Please give me the answer as soon as possible,
    Thanks a lot.
    Manish

    Hi,
    Have you checked out SAP help file for this workflow?
    [http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_04/helpdata/EN/0e/0e3b00b84111d3b5b2006094192bbb/frameset.htm]
    Regards,
    Lim...

  • Rant: can't get past external 1st level support

    I have been repeatedly told by SAP SMP 1st level support to use SCN for a kernel problem, so I guess next best forum is the local pub to discuss kernel level task handlers...
    Perhaps you have also noticed that sometimes you cannot terminate sessions in SM04? Sometimes when ending a login session with /nex some sessions dont close as expected? Behind these are the function module TH_DELETE_USER which is a wrapper for a kernel function from the task handler family. So I opened a customer message as this is now a problem for me (to ensure that logoff is completed).
    So 1st level support from an external service partner (?) pick up the ticket and for the past month the following game has been going on:
    of course, want to logon to my system... (makes no sense for a kernel function anyway..)
    tell me to upgrade and try again, it might work... (but cannot say why they are feeling lucky today)
    tell me that the FM is not supported (so I should never logoff again...)
    tell me that kernel task handlers is a consulting issue so use SCN...
    So... now I am here and post a link to it in the customer message and would like some help to get past this 1st level external support blockade. Or by some miracle an SCN kernel consultant ninja shows up and explains to me how I should logoff correctly?
    I will post a link to this in the message which I dont see the point in closing, despite 1st level getting worried about their statistics...
    Cheers,
    Julius

    Hi Kristen
    Does SAP support have some way to analyse the free text (maybe HANA comes into play) or the incident attributes to find stats on
    Number of times incident sent back to customer
    Delay between returned by customer/sent first time and responded to
    Free text for phrases like "please escalate"; "As mentioned previously; "Stop telling me to apply notes; "I already tried that" - I'm sure a list of common phrases could be supplied by Coffee Corner
    Search where customer provided system connection details and SAP support person sends call back to request system connections
    Analyse the history to see the common themes on the customer support side. Most of what we raise in SCN discussions like these are documented in the Incident.
    My first time raising support messages (now incidents) had my colleagues tell me not to get my hopes up that my issue will get resolved and to expect my incident sent back to me. Even grabbing facts and data of how many calls are sent for "Rework" might help understand what is an issue that can be fixed versus what is the customer perception.
    In short - maybe SAP support needs to look at changes to their metrics on how they identify issues and then use them as their KPIs to improve their services.
    Unrelated, I wish our SCN reputations could be linked to SAP Marketplace incidents - if someone high up in a space raises a questions and also links the SCN discussion in then it might deserve immediate escalation past level 1. This one here might be wishful thinking
    Regards
    Colleen

  • AddOn O.S. error after updating new release and/or patches

    I have had some problems after installing new release or patches on existing SAP B1 installation.
    A system error message is shown while attempting to starting SAP B1 AddOns.
    The problem occurs on several clients but not with a specific rule.
    Some SAP B1 clients continue working well like i expected.
    In order to fix this error i have already tried:
    - to reinstall DI API
    - to reinstall third party components required by my AddOn
    - to reinstall AddOn
    - to reinstall SAP B1 Client
    - to delete/rename SM_OBS_DLL folder in local temporary folder
    - hope and pray
    I have the same problems with VB6 and VB.NET AddOns, using UI and DI API.
    This error has been issued since SAP B1 2005 SP01 PL09 installation.
    Thanks in advance for any kind of help provided.

    Thank you for your help.
    I solved the problem with VB6 AddOn using only a DI.
    Next days I will be able to try with VB.NET 2003 projecy using both DI and UI API.
    I hope i won't have any further problem...
    Here is a newer question:
    Is it possible i have to recompile the AddOn every time i install new patches on existing installation on which i have already developed AddOns?
    This is not a good news because there are several patches issued and if i have to recompile the program i must generate new ARD file and install the new AddOn release...
    I hope this error won't be shown with next release or patch even if you gave me a very helpful solution.
    Many thanks
    Marcello Bordiga

  • WEB BEx Analyzer Comments on Query level

    I would like to enable BW users to create comments for some queries an enable other user to read them. System BW 7.01.
    Issues and questions:
    -how to create comment on query level - it's always on data (KYF), Metadata or Master data level
    -I would like to show the document icon - next to the query title (it's relevant for the query)
    -when I create Comments (with the button in the standard template), it's on the data level (combination of KYF) - and when I
    switch to icon display (settings) I get icons in every line. If this would be just at KYF header??
    -where can I edit, delete, ... recorded comments
    Thanks, Tom

    Hi Tom,
    1) If you want to create comments on query level, you need to create metadata documents, object type 'ELEM', object name is the technical name of the query.
    2) Document icons are always shown in the data table. Thus it will be hard to show a document icon for a document on query level. If you are using web templates, you can insert a single document item on metadata documents to display the comment on the query.
    3) Where the document is displayed depends on the document properties. If a characteristic is document property depends on the infoobject setting -> transaction RSD1 -> enter the characteristic -> tab 'general'.
    To see the document properties you can execute the query for example in RSRT (html mode) -> create a new document on any cell. On the bottom you will see the document assignment. Compare this assignment with the cell next to it. If its the same the document will be displayed in both cells. The same can be done for example in java web -> create a new document and switch to the second tab ('BI').
    4) Documents can be edited and deleted in the document browser itself, when you open the document in the executed query or in transaction RSA1 -> documents.
    Best regards,
    Janine

  • Whether Item Level release is possible in PO [Purchase Order] ?

    Hai SAP Gurus,
                             Whether Item Level release is possible in PO [Purchase Order] ?
                              Guide me..

    Hi,
    In std sap system its not possible...
    You can release at header level only..
    Recheck it from here:
    SPRO >> MM >> Purchasing >> PO >> release procedure...
    Here there is no option provided for item wise release,...
    Regards
    Priyanka.P

  • Just I want to know  What is 1st level & 2nd level support

    At client place on shore in production support project in as What is 1st level & 2nd level support?
    and  Nature of work
    Thanks in advance
    Edited by: Arun Varadarajan on Feb 5, 2009 2:34 PM
    Edited by: Arun Varadarajan on Feb 5, 2009 2:37 PM

    I would still defend myself saying that this has already been answered...
    I just did a search on SDN and found a post that would answer your question....
    Re: Help desk& rollup
    you are looking at L1 and L2 support....
    The thread was locked because the question is already answered ( or discussed about  ) in another post and you can get your answers faster by just searching....
    Also if you do find the answers fetched as not being correct or accurate enough - you would need to mention that you did search the forums before posting. This way questions which have already been answered are not brought up again and it ends up with others doing the searching for you which paints a wrong picture...
    Also in some cases L1 teams are merged with the company's existing L1 support desk to avoid confusion but follow similar rules as mentioned in the link and simlarly L2 - when you have multiple systems being supported by a central support team you get such scenarios where L1 and L2 are on-shore.
    My 0.02
    Arun Varadarajan
    P.S I am removing the reference to my name in the title... and BTW the search took me less than 2 minutes ... which is why we want people to use the search functionality more than raising duplicate posts....
    Edited by: Arun Varadarajan on Feb 5, 2009 2:35 PM
    Edited by: Arun Varadarajan on Feb 5, 2009 2:36 PM

Maybe you are looking for