Aps for processing RAW or DNG picture files

Are there any aps for processing RAW and or DNG files on ad iPad?

In the normal situation, LR needs to see a PS installed for it to detect the Edit In PS option is possible, so if you uninstall both, then install PS, first, then LR.  Of course with this release there may be some hiccup that requires installing either one or the other, again, but if you've uninstalled both and are reinstalling both, then install PS, first.

Similar Messages

  • Preference for Processing RAW in LR or PS Camera Raw

    I'm not finding this setting anywhere, and it seems to arbitrarily go back and forth, after updating software or installing software. Hoping someone can help.
    When using an external editor (PS CS5) to edit photos from Lightroom 3, there is an inital preference to select whether to use ACR in PS to process the raw file, or to use LR.  I always want to do this in PS.  There's often times where I'm compositing multiple photos.  I only need to open up that raw file to quickly grab a section of it to move into another file.  I don't want to save the raw file as a psd, tif or whatever, just select, copy and move that section of the file and then close it.
    The problem is that preference setting is only when you first set up the Lightroom, I'm not seeing it anywhere on any of the preference menus.  And for some reason, it has switched to processing the raw in Lightroom.  So now i'm ending up with useless psd files.  That takes up space on my hard drive, takes longer to archive on to external hard drives, and is slower to open the files into PS.  It may seem like a small inconvenience, but when shooting 1000s, or 10000s of images a week it adds up quickly.  And to get rid of them, i have to reveal in finder, then delete, then remove from catalog in LR - which just wastes time.
    Am i missing something? If anyone knows how to set this or a workaround i'd love to hear it.
    Sys specs, if it matters
    Mac Pro, dual quad-core, 16gb ram, GeFOrce 8800 GT 512mb graphics card
    OS X Snow Leopard
    LR 3.6
    5d Mk II CR2 files
    PS CS5 (12.0.4) and also the newest prerelease (can't disclose much on this)
    LR and PS are both great in their own right, and do things better than the other in some situations, I wish Adobe would make them play nicer together.

    7. Feb 16, 2012 6:05 PM (in response to b_gossweiler) 
    Re: Preference for Processing RAW in LR or PS Camera Raw
    In any event even if you choose to edit the original in PS, as I believe you should be able to do you will still end up with a Tiff, PSD or jpeg file when you have finished your work in PS. Then why are you using Lightroom? This will have a bearing on the advice you will get.
    Like I said above, LR and PS both serve specific functions, and yes they do overlap in some areas, and I yes do use both in my workflow.  PS isn't a cataloging program.  LR doens't have layers and sucks at complex editing tasks.  There's 2 reasons i use both, amoung many many others. 
    The point of my question is that i don't want LR creating and saving PSD files on my hard drive when i don't need a PSD of that specific photo.  You use to be able to make LR open a raw file in PS and use ACR to processs it.  That meant you could close the raw file in Photoshop, and nowhere along the way was a PSD file, or any other file saved.

  • Universal Binary programs for processing RAW images

    Hi,
    Are there any universal binary programs for processing RAW files (from my Nikon D200)?

    I currently use a D-70 and have had no problems importing and manipulating NEF files with iPhoto 6.0.1. I would assume that the D-200 uses the same file structure as the D-70, doesn't it?
    intel iMac 20"; 1.67 GHz PB G4; Dual 2.3 GHz PowerPC G5   Mac OS X (10.4.5)  

  • Can I download Elements plugin for Processing RAW images from Sony ILCE6000?

    Can I download Elements plugin for Processing RAW images from Sony ILCE6000?

    If you are using PSE 12 or 13, just go to Help>Updates in the editor.

  • Import RAW images to Pictures file instead of iphoto

    I am trying to import my RAW image files onto my MacBookPro, but they go directly into iphoto and only display as small file JPGs. How can I get them to import into a Pictures file or Desktop?

    Not sure if this is what you're looking for but lets see if I cannot give you some idea.
    If you got to \User\yourname\Pictures\iPhoto Library\ Right click iPhoto Library and select Show Package Contents.
    In there, you will probably see 2 folders titled "Modified" and "Original"
    In those folders, you will see your pictures categorized into Years.
    Good luck. Hope thats what you were looking for.

  • Unable to process RAW .PEF .DNG from Pentax K-7

    I have the latest updates. Camera Raw 3.1, Aperture 3.0.2, OS 10.6.3... when i first import the images I can process them as normal. My RAW adjustments are available. But then after a few minutes aperture will update them and it will say the file has been processed by an earlier version (which is a lie because I have never processed them before) and there's a button to "reprocess". The images will lose all adjustments and have a green hue... no boost or anything. This is happening with both .PEF and .DNG from my Pentax K-7... which is running firmware 1.3
    I've tried reinstalling aperture 3.0 but it's the same. I've also deleted raw camera 3.1 by:
    sudo rm -rf /System/Library/CoreServices/RawCamera.bundle
    and reinstalled... it's still the same.
    what gives?

    Hi, i have exactly the same issue on my computer, but with a Nikon D90. I just completely reinstalled system (OS, Aperture, Camera Raw) from scratch on new harddisk, no avail. Really mysterious, get indeed a weird green hue, and once image goes like this, there is no turning back. Still looking for solution as well - sorry!

  • BPM for Processing Multiple records in a file

    Hello All:
    I using BPM to process Goods issue using BAPI BAPI_GOODSMVT_CREATE. The BPM setps are as
    Step 1  Receive Request from Asyn File Interface
    Step 2  Transformation Map to Bapi request Structure
    Step 3  Send Sync Request to Bapi
    Step 4  Transformation Map Bapi Response to file
    Step 5  Send Asyn Message to File
    My input file  is as fallows
    H,20050613,20050613,9999,HEAD TXT,03,
    P,000001000108,0001,COMMON,2,EA,1000,1011,261,ITM TXT,
    H,20050613,20050613,9999,HEAD TXT,03,
    P,000001000108,0001,COMMON,3,EA,1000,1011,261,ITM TXT,
    The output file is as fallows
      <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
    - <ns1:MT_SAP_RESPONSE_ITMS_DATA xmlns:ns1="http://testcompany.com/xi/ITMS">
    - <BAPI_STR>
    - <HEADER>
      <MAT_DOC>4900000696</MAT_DOC>
      </HEADER>
      </BAPI_STR>
      </ns1:MT_SAP_RESPONSE_ITMS_DATA>
    The problem I am facing is although my file has 2 records of goods issue data (Header and Item data) , the BPM processes only one record (Header and Item) and creates a material doc in SAP and outputs a file with the material doc number as above. Ideally I would like the XI system to process both the records and produce 2 material docs as output .
    Also my input file adapter has been picking up both the records as this is visible in the SXMB_MONITOR logs.
    Do I need to introduce a loop in the BPM ?. If so can any can any body give me an example or point me in the right direction.
    Many Thanks
    TBH

    Udo:
    <b>you need a mapping splitting one message with multiple entries into multiple messages with one entry, which you put into a multiple line BPM container.</b>
       Are you implying loop Step 1 Receive Request from Asyn File Interface and collect them into a multiline container ?. How does the loop know how many times to loop.
    Would appreciate your comments
    Thorsten

  • KonicaMinolta D7 - no support for ".MRW" raw

    There does not appear to be any support for the KonicaMinolta D7 ".MRW" raw format. Support is available in iPhoto.
    Does Apple intend to provide support for this product in Aperture?
    PM

    This is more of a reply to the thread then just the first poster.
    First, the D7 is a different camera then the 7D, confusing isn't it.
    Further more their is also the newer 5D.
    All have the .MRW format.
    Pre 10.4.3 OSX supported .MRW files from on of minoltas non-SLR cameras. 10.4.3 added the 7D support.
    The problem with OSX is it doesn't support formats in a logical way. The problem here is the same as the problem with the Canon Rebel XT/350D . Basically instead of seeing it as a .MRW and giving it a go. It looks to see what camera it came from in the meta data, if not on it's pre-selected list, OSX rejects the file, even if in reality if it tried, it would open it right up. Also not unlike how Aperture won't run on lots of hardware, but it's just because the app has a list saying what it will and won't run on, not anything based on actually trying to run. Thus why aperture is locked out of FX5200 video cards and power mac G4s for no real reason.
    Anyways, you can go in and find the Raw.plst and add a entry for some cameras not supported and poof, they work.
    If you own a KM 5D, which is just a smaller cheaper re-package of the 7D, by default OSX won't work with it, or DNG files made from it. But if you go in and add a entry for a 5D, (just copy the 7D entry and change the name) poof, things start working. I was able to get it to at least open DNG files made from 5D files by doing this. No luck with the MRW files yet. I don't have aperture to see if for some reason they will work there. Aperture uses the same foundation as the rest of the OS for open raw and dng files.
    With some luck in the future apple will change this practice and just have OSX see a file as its raw format, not as what device if came from, and give it a honest effort to try and open it, not just ignore it because it's not on the magical list.

  • Solutions for processing images in LR, then printing as cards through ID?

    Hello,
    Might anyone have experience with processing photographs in LR CC, then printing from ID CC through an inkjet printer? I thought it wouldn't be such a big deal, but am finding my colors are not holding true. What I see in Lightroom is nice on screen and if I print a single card through LR it looks nice. Export the same image as a tif or jpg and print it on the same paper stock through InDesign and the image is not correct. I am selecting the same color profile for the paper stock in each program. Somewhere I am overlooking a detail or two that really matters. Might anyone have a short list of items I must coordinate or synchronize between the two applications?
    John

    7. Feb 16, 2012 6:05 PM (in response to b_gossweiler) 
    Re: Preference for Processing RAW in LR or PS Camera Raw
    In any event even if you choose to edit the original in PS, as I believe you should be able to do you will still end up with a Tiff, PSD or jpeg file when you have finished your work in PS. Then why are you using Lightroom? This will have a bearing on the advice you will get.
    Like I said above, LR and PS both serve specific functions, and yes they do overlap in some areas, and I yes do use both in my workflow.  PS isn't a cataloging program.  LR doens't have layers and sucks at complex editing tasks.  There's 2 reasons i use both, amoung many many others. 
    The point of my question is that i don't want LR creating and saving PSD files on my hard drive when i don't need a PSD of that specific photo.  You use to be able to make LR open a raw file in PS and use ACR to processs it.  That meant you could close the raw file in Photoshop, and nowhere along the way was a PSD file, or any other file saved.

  • I have a Nikon D600 and D800 and I shoot everything in Raw. I use Photoshop Elements 9 for processing but I have been unable to convert any RAW files to open in PSE. Says unable to parse the file. What does this mean and how do I fix it?

    I have a Nikon D600 and D800 and I shoot everything in Raw. I use Photoshop Elements 9 for processing but I have been unable to convert any RAW files to open in PSE. Says unable to parse the file. What does this mean and how do I fix it?

    Since pse 9 can only use up to camera raw 6.5 and the d600 needs at least 7.3 and the d800 needs at least 6.7, you can use the
    8.6 adobe dng converter to convert those files to dng copies, which then pse 9 should open.
    8.6 dng converter
    windows
    Adobe - Adobe Camera Raw and DNG Converter : For Windows : Adobe DNG Converter 8.6
    mac
    Adobe - Adobe Camera Raw and DNG Converter : For Macintosh : Adobe DNG Converter 8.6
    Note:
    If you have windows xp or vista or mac os x 10.6, then you'll need to use the 8.3 dng converter instead
    windows
    Adobe - Adobe Camera Raw and DNG Converter : For Windows : Adobe DNG Converter 8.3
    mac
    Adobe - Adobe Camera Raw and DNG Converter : For Macintosh : Adobe DNG Converter 8.3
    how to use the dng converter
    Camera Raw: How to use Adobe DNG Converter - YouTube
    more info on supported cameras and camera raw plugins required
    Camera Raw plug-in | Supported cameras
    Camera Raw-compatible Adobe applications

  • Saving processed files in original raw (or DNG?) format

    Hello. I'm new to Lightroom, so although I've spent a day or so ploughing through the tutorials, please accept my apologies if my question seems dumb.
    However I can't see an answer to my problem so far.
    It is this: after importing my raw files (CR2) into Lightroom and processing them etc to get them to a result I'm happy with, I'd now like to be able to keep the new, processed version of my images somewhere in Lightroom in the original raw format so that I can quickly access those processed images again in the future and then export in  appropriate formats as I choose, which might be screen jpegs or prints or whatever – different from my first export.
    In other words, I know I can 'save' (export) files to a folder as jpegs etc, but if I subsequently decide to export those same files in a different format (e.g prints), I don't want to have to go back to the original raw files and start the processing all over again to arrive at what I'd already been happy with, in order to re-export.
    I suspect I'm missing something really basic here, but it's so basic I can't work out what it is!
    I suppose another way of reframing the question might be: is there a way I can save and store my processed raw images in Lightroom so that I can access them easily, and not have to re-process them unless I want to?
    I haven't yet got my head around DNG files. Is this part of the solution perhaps?
    Lightroom is incredibly fantastic, but now that I've managed to get my images to where I want them, I don't want to re-visit the processing on them un-necessarily, which is what I seem to be doing at the moment...
    I have Lightroom 5.4 on a Macbook Air running Mavericks OSX 10.9.2 if it makes any difference.
    Thank you, I would be very grateful for your advice.

    While the advice to read Victoria bampton's Quick Start Guide is excellent, I'd like to provide a little shorter piece of philosphy that might help
    Lightroom works differenlty than any other software you may have used in the past. You would be wise to eliminate from your brain your ideas about how to manage files and edits that might have been present in your mind from your use of other photo editing software. You would be wise to start using Lightroom with a clean slate in your mind about how things work. Your statements above show clearly that you are thinking that Lightroom works the same as other photo managing/editing software, and this will lead you/already has lead you in the wrong direction, and in harmful directions.
    So wipe the slate clean. Prepare to learn how to manage files and manage edits from a clean slate.
    Things that are different about Lightroom
    Lightroom is completely non-destructive editing. This means that the pixels in your original photos are NEVER (that's NEVER, a very strong word, chosen intentionally to mean, well it means NEVER) changed by Lightroom. This implies that you do NOT need to make a copy of a photo before you start editing it. Making a copy of a photo before you start editing it is a complete waste of time and disk space. (Also see side comment below)
    Edits are not stored by saving a copy of the edited photo on your hard disk, as Photoshop or Photoshop Elements would do. Edits are not, by default, stored in the photo file itself. Edits are stored in the Lightroom catalog, which is a database file. The edits are essentially stored as numbers (example: Exposure +0.5, contrast +20, Highlights –15) in the catalog. You cannot turn this method of saving edits in the catalog off. As a result, if you close Lightroom after you perform some edits, and then open Lightroom again at some later time, your edits will be in the catalog, and displayed for you automatically, without you taking any specific "save" action or without you taking any specific action to tell Lightroom to display the edits.
    However, some people make the critical mistake of removing the photos from Lightroom after the edits are completed ... this also removes the edits from Lightroom and (in Lightroom's default mode of operation) the edits are now lost forever. Even if you use an option in Lightroom to store the edits with the file, this mode of operation requires you to do more work and you recieve less benefits from Lightroom, than simply leaving the photos in Lightroom. Removing photos from Lightroom after the edits are completed is highly unrecommended.
    Photos are never stored in Lightroom. Photos are always stored on your hard disk. They are stored wherever you put them, or where you instruct Lightroom to put them on your hard disk during Import. Lightroom maintains a link in its database to the file's location on disk. As a result, if you move or rename or delete your photos (or the folders that contain them) outside of Lightroom, then Lightroom cannot find the photos and you can no longer work with them in Lightroom. There are ways to fix this, but the best solution IN MY OPINION, is to no longer manage/organize your photos via operating system/folders/file names and to no longer manage/organize your photos by moving them from here to there after importing them; rather you should manage/organize your photos using Lightroom tools such as keywords and other metadata and then you not only have more powerful tools for managing/organizing than you have in your operating system, but the issue regarding Lightroom not being able to find your photos goes away
    Side comment: in item 1 I said you don't have to make a copy before you edit the photos. However you do need to make backups (identical copies) of your original photos and catalog file on a different hard disk. This is to protect against the future situation where your hard disk will fail, resulting in the loss of your photos, and to protect against accidental erasure of your original photos. It is not to protect against Lightroom changing the pixels of your original photos, which as I said, Lightroom does not do.

  • What do I need to process raw files in Photoshop CS5 for a Canon Rebel EOS t4i?

    What do I need to process raw files in Photoshop CS5 for a Canon Rebel EOS t4i?

    You would need ACR 7.x which is available in CS6.  Or as ertho said you can get the free DNG 7.3 converter and convert raw to a DNG.

  • Just bought a Nikon d750 and confused about adobe LR4 and PS6 support for the RAW files. I have DNG 8.7 but wondering if LR and PS will import direct soon Thanks for any advice

    Just bought a Nikon d750 and confused about adobe LR4 and PS6 support for the RAW files. I have DNG 8.7 but wondering if LR and PS will import direct soon Thanks for any advice

    Support for the Nikon D750 was introduced in the latest version of LR 5.7 and ACR 8.7 on Novemder 18th 2014.
    Further updates to LR 4 were stopped when LR 5 was released on June 9th 2013. No further updates for bug fixes and new camera support.
    Nada, LR 4 will never support Nikon D750. The Nikon D750 was introduced into the market in September 2014 some 15 months after further development of LR 4 was discontinued.
    You can use the Adobe DNG program (free download for the package) to convert the Nef (raw) files from your Nikon D750 to the Adobe DNG format which will permit you to import those into LR 4. This is the crutch provided by Adobe to allow for the processing of raw files with outdated versions of LR and ACR.
    You can also update the ACR plugin for PS CS6 to version 8.7 which can also work with the raw files from the D750. For direct support in Lightroom you will need to upgrade (paid) to version 5.7.

  • Will PSE10 process raw/nef files for the nikon D800

    Will PSE10 process raw/nef files for the nikon D800

    Not directly.
    You have to download the FREE Adobe DNG Converter (version 7.3) and convert your NEFs to DNG, then PSE10 can make use of them

  • "Edit In" Photoshop CC not working for RAW or DNG files after applying LR 5.3 and Camera Raw 8.3

    I just applied the Lightroom 5.3 and Camera Raw 8.3 updates and now am no longer able to open RAW or DNG files into Photoshop CC. When I select a file and choose "Edit In" Photoshop, photoshop will launch, then nothing will happen. After 2 to 5 minutes, an error will popup in Lightroom saying "The file could not be edited because Adobe Photoshop CC could not be launched." An error I've never seen before. When I click "Ok", Lightroom will show that it's "preparing a file for editing" in the upper left, it will create and save a psd to disk and in the catalog (another new behavior), then it will open in photoshop. All other file types (jpgs, tiff, psd) seem to work/open fine between applications. No difference if I open photoshop prior to selecting "Edit In". Selecting "Edit In" other applications, like Viveza, work fine.
    I tried first deleting preference files in both applications. No luck. Ditto for plugins. Notta. Eventually I completely uninstalled and fresh installed Photoshop, Lightroom, and Bridge from the cloud. Same deal...can't open raw/dng files into Photoshop.
    I'm at a complete loss, dead in the water, with a mountain of editing work piling on top of me. Kicking myself for applying the upgrades, which I had been delaying for some time to avoid just such a cluster%#$. Ugh.
    I'm on a PC running Windows 7 64bit.
    Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated.

    In the normal situation, LR needs to see a PS installed for it to detect the Edit In PS option is possible, so if you uninstall both, then install PS, first, then LR.  Of course with this release there may be some hiccup that requires installing either one or the other, again, but if you've uninstalled both and are reinstalling both, then install PS, first.

Maybe you are looking for